Category Archives: Fundraising Fundamentals

Nonprofit Radio for February 13, 2015: Design Strategy & Digital Strategy

Big Nonprofit Ideas for the Other 95%

I Love Our Sponsor!

Sponsored by Generosity Series, a nationwide series of multi-charity 5K events that provide a proven peer-to-peer fundraising platform to charities and an amazing experience for their participants.

Sign-up for show alerts!

Listen Live or Archive:

My Guests:

Matthew ScharpnickDesign Strategy

Matthew Scharpnick has thoughts on what good design is, why it’s important and how to achieve it. What is design strategy and why the heck is Charity Water talked about so much? Matthew is co-founder and chief strategy officer of Elefint Designs.

 

 

 

Amy Sample WardDigital Strategy

Picture of Amy Sample Ward

Highlights of the 2015 Digital Integration & Outlook Report, released this week. We’ll look at trends in staffing, strategy, engagement and more. Amy Sample Ward is our social media contributor and CEO of NTEN, the Nonprofit Technology Network.

 

 

 


Top Trends. Sound Advice. Lively Conversation.

You’re on the air and on target as I delve into the big issues facing your nonprofit—and your career.

If you have big dreams but an average budget, tune in to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.

I interview the best in the business on every topic from board relations, fundraising, social media and compliance, to technology, accounting, volunteer management, finance, marketing and beyond. Always with you in mind.

Sign-up for show alerts!

Sponsored by: GenEvents logo
View Full Transcript

Transcript for 227_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150213.mp3

Processed on: 2018-11-11T23:15:11.827Z
S3 bucket containing transcription results: transcript.results
Link to bucket: s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/transcript.results
Path to JSON: 2015…02…227_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150213.mp3.585784491.json
Path to text: transcripts/2015/02/227_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150213.txt

Hello and welcome to tony martignetti non-profit radio big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent i’m your aptly named host it’s the valentine’s edition happy valentine’s day! I’m going to shout out np valentine’s throughout the show and here is the first one roses are red, sunshine is warm, mayor love go on forever like a nine, ninety form look, i love that one that’s jesse anna, born eamon in suwannee, tennessee and she’s at rhymes with messy on twitter at rhymes with messy love it we have a listener of the week oh my goodness! They are incredible fans of non-profit radio why? W c of monterey county, california eliminating racism, empowering women they love the show today they just tweeted, how do we love non-profit radio and tony m let us count the ways and they’re all listening today. Each of them is listening today. Sam, should i do it? I got the list. Who? Who cares what sam says? It’s, my show. I’ll do whatever the hell i want. Shut up, sam. What do you see? A monterey county, of course. The administration staff germaine patricia chelsea. Hello, chelsea. Fabiola! Danielle! Leon! Ella! Danielle! No! One was daniel danielle rosa, cheryl hello, cheryl mccormick, molly sikora. Emanuel got to get the clinical supervisors rosa and lose have tohave the pre licensed therapists in there brenda leigh, anne marie, tsa, enrique, carmen, ana, christina marie, tsa, maria elizabeth and mary ann. And, of course, where would wide wch monterey be without the domestic violence advocates? They’d be nowhere. Diana, angie, maria, ludmila, lucinda, rachel and of course, can’t forget marissa robe lace the y w c a of monterey county, our listener of the week congratulations! Thank you so so much for loving non-profit radio i’m glad you’re all with me. I’d suffer the embarrassment of triskaidekaphobia if i came to learn that you missed today’s show it’s d s day that’s not domination and submission it’s designed strategy and digital strategy design strategy. Matthew scharpnick has thoughts on what good design is, why it’s important and how to achieve it? What is designed strategy and why is charity water talked about so much? Matthew is co founder and chief strategy officer of elephant designs digital strategy highlights of the twenty fifteen digital integration and outlook report released just yesterday it’s cutting edge we’re gonna look at trends in staffing, strategy, engagement and more, amy sample ward is our social media contributor and ceo of inten, the non-profit technology network between the guests on tony’s take to have mohr and p valentine’s and my latest standup comedy gig responsive by generosity siri’s they host multi charity five k runs and walks very glad that master scharpnick matthew scharpnick can be with me today. He’s, a design strategist and researcher, as well as user experience and information designer he’s, co founder and chief strategy officer of elephant designs. He runs the design blawg redesigning good for the chronicle of philanthropy, and he has written for stanford social innovation review dot net magazine and others on twitter he’s at mat sharp a ch aarp and his company is at elefant designs dot com that’s e l e f i n t matthew scharpnick welcome to the show. Hey, tony, thanks for having me. My pleasure. I’m glad you’re with us. Why is designed? Oh, thank you. Why is designed so important, matthew, i think this side is important for a lot of reasons. I think it might be important to think about what design is when we answer. That question, you know, a lot of people when they think of design think of visual design, and that is certainly a critical, important part of a lot of things, and we can talk about that. But design, in a broader sense, could be thought of as just the intentional act of creating things and really understanding how everyone’s going to consume that product or service, and putting a lot of intentionality and effort and energy into crafting that experience for people. So i think with that broader definition, it’s really the ability to create things that are going to work really well for different audience. And so what we do specifically at elephant is look at how design can play out across a number of different things that non-profit organizations and ngos and other good causes they’re trying to do so there’s things like service design, which can be actually crafting the processes and services that people use, whether it could be a branding, which is something that i think a lot of organizations and the social sector are now really paying a lot more attention to basic information design obviously went designed so it’s a broad category and you specifically say, you know, doing this with intentionality and effort, so we’re talking about more than a new logo or a new tagline or new colors on the website? Yeah, that’s, right? I think you know, those are all the deliverables. Yeah, those are small pieces, right? Exactly. And so it’s not uncommon that people come to our design studio and they’re thinking directly about the deliverables. So maybe they wanted info graphic or maybe they want a logo, and what we always encouraged people to do is to take a step back and that’s what we call ourselves the strategic design studio because our approach to things it’s really to say okay, well, let’s, look at, you know, what is the goal of this? Why do we want an intro graphic? Maybe an infographic isn’t actually the best way for us to achieve the goal that we’re trying to achieve, or even if it is let’s really think critically about who these audiences are, what we need to create them. And how would you describe this is this is very ethereal stuff, and this is, you know, it’s, a highly skilled profession, i know, but you know you’re you’re best shot. How would you describe good design? Um, i think good design is designed that is effective designed that really delights people that helps people understand what the goals are behind that designed without having to pay a lot of effort into it. So where i see designed being this amazing compliment strategy is probably a lot of listeners, if they’ve been involved in any kind of consulting project, would have seen the deliver bowl at the end of that as some kind of long report. I know when i was a director of marketing for non-profit we often have fund-raising consultant, consultant, different people that would come in, and they would deliver something like that, and it was really great information. These were experts that really knew what they were talking about, but i think the unfortunate side that i saw was that very few people would ever access this information. They might deliver a report that the ceo and i were the only ones who saw it, and it would be something that i would maybe review a couple of times a year, and what i realized was that when you took the strategic insights and you bake them into a design, then people just get it? So i think, really effective design and you’re right, it it isn’t a serial question we could we could probably spend a lot of time just exploring that one question, but i think on a high level, if you just get what an organization is about, what it’s trying to do, what values are without really having to think about it too much, then they’ve probably done a good job of crafting their brand and creating really quality design, and you should be able to get that from just your your first moments. Looking at their sight? Yeah, i mean, i think you know again website is a very common touchpoint most people you know, when you hear about an organization of any kind, the station very likely to hop onto their website, and so that’s obviously one of the most important pieces tow any organizations brand but a brand extends obviously much more than just its website and there’s other visual deliverables know there’s collateral materials there’s alone, though there’s all these other things that people touch, but a brand is really this summation of feelings that people have about an organization. So it’s your website talks about how you’re a very caring organization and that when people go to interact with your staff, they find them to be a little bit of luke or they don’t give them very good service. Then you’re telling two contradictory stories and eventually that starts to fall apart. So i think one of the things where, you know, someone might just be going into it thinking, oh, brand, we need to design our logo on our website, but when you start to expand these questions of what your values are and looking at all the different places where people interact with your organization, it really opens up the opportunity for organizations to think about this in a broader way, and you obviously want to build a brand that’s very authentic to who you are is an organization because if you’re trying to make claims that don’t really resonate with the experience that people having out world and eventually it’s gonna fall apart on you know who you are and what your work is, what your mission is, we’re going, we’re going to go out for a break a couple seconds, we come back, of course, matthew scharpnick and i’m going to keep talking about this, including, bring in your mission and how do boardmember sze sometimes get in the way of good design? Stay with us, you’re tuned to non-profit radio. Tony martignetti also hosts a podcast for the chronicle of philanthropy. Fund-raising fundamentals is a quick ten minute burst of fund-raising insights, published once a month. Tony’s guests are expert in crowdfunding, mobile giving event fund-raising direct mail and donor cultivation. Really, all the fund-raising issues that make you wonder, am i doing this right? Is there a better way there is? Find the fund-raising fundamentals archive it. Tony martignetti dot com that’s marketmesuite n e t t i remember there’s, a g before the end, thousands of listeners have subscribed on itunes. You can also learn maura, the chronicle website, philanthropy dot com fund-raising fundamentals the better way. Welcome back to big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent. We’re watching the hashtag non-profit radio of course in the studio give local america hope you joined in said you were going to be joining us. I hope you’re with us. Oh my gosh, live listener love falls church, virginia salinas, california or we know who that is. That’s the y w c a of monterey county. Glad you’re with us. Congratulations again, locust grove, virginia i’m a nominee. Wisconsin, bellevue, washington love it up in the pacific northwest and all the way down here to hicksville, new york on long island. Lots more live listener loved to come. Lots more here’s, another mp valentine that i love. My database was pierced by cupid’s love dark you caught my eye when you wealth screened my heart heimans that’s fabulous that is ah, we did it there at we did it. And why? See on twitter love that we’ll screen to my heart matthew let’s let’s talk about mission and and design is that is that’s the place to start o r now? Yeah, sure. Okay. Thanks. Yes, s so how do we how do we how do we? Convey our mission through good design in this i think this is what we’re talking about strategic design strategy and strategic design. Yeah, for sure. Um, i think there’s a few components to you, no one is obviously met judy, so a lot of the work we’re doing with people is crafting a really clear and concise message elearning before, for example, designing somebody’s website will almost always be involved in writing the copy on the home page and a few of the other key pages and there’s, just ways that design plays into your messaging. So if you’re showing something visually, perhaps with a picture or even just feelings and values that you’re trying to communicate, then that doesn’t always have to be communicated through text as well. Your copy so a classic example that i probably used way too much, but i think they do an amazing job of it that everyone’s familiar with his apple. You know you don’t have on apple’s website, and they have to tell you again and again about you know, how they care about design and how they build really quality products that delight people. They will mention things like that for. Sure in there, copy, but it’s also just built into everything that they do and all you know you’ll see billboard ads that apple does and it’s just a picture of the newest vote. There’s actually absolutely no messaging it’s pretty remarkable that you’ve been able to build a brand where all you have to do is show a picture of your product at a certain angle, and we’ve all seen how successful they’ve been by really integrating design and i think and a lot of ways, steve jobs was ahead of his time and now, and he unfortunately doesn’t even get to see this there now by far the largest company by market capitalization, and i think you’re starting to see more and more companies who are getting this the private sector and indefinitely this is moving over into the social sector where really crafting powerful variances for your customers is important more than anything else. And there’s actually a big pushed back by a lot of larger companies now towards focusing on shareholder value and there’s a lot of people out there marc benioff just wrote a piece on it he’s obviously doing a lot of work with his foundation of how we really need to focus on the individual, and so i think we can sometimes fall into the same trap two in the social sector, i’m getting a little bit off track here, but of course, your mission at the end of the day is teo reach out to the clients that you’re trying to serve and to create a better world but there’s a lot of pressures, you’re also running an organisation that requires donors to fund that organization, have the resources you need to do your job, so a lot of attention gets put on that. And so i think one of the things that we stumbled into and elephant was multiple audiences coming from two very different directions and having to understand your mission that way, you typically see in an organization that it has a board of directors which usually in most cases, lives a little bit a little bit different lifestyle comes from a different place than the clients that you’re trying to serve. Both of those might be different from the staff so it’s just understanding that your organization is really serving multiple types of people and making sure that you’re accomplishing not and communicating that all the time, something that i think design is a great reminder of and the process of designing great exploration you led us into that exactly led us into that process a little bit. This is so really it’s fascinating to me. You’re you’re starting with an organization’s mission and that may be, you know, expressed in seventy five hundred words, and then what’s the what’s, the creative process too translate that into identity on on websites, facebook pages, collateral materials and all that stuff you mentioned help us help us see into that your mind that that process? Yeah, sure, i think for us, it’s really depends on the project and the resources were dedicating to it. If we’re doing something that’s small for us, maybe one of the simplest projects will work on it like a static prince, one page piece or even an infographic or something like that. And on every project, even on those kind of simpler, smaller projects will do something with a strategy and branding document that’s our peace that we send out to our clients have him fill out and it asked questions like, why does your organization exists what was missing from the world, the new guy’s felt this organization had to be created woman that need that you were trying to fill its rhythm, and then we go into things like who you’re different audiences, and we have people rank them, and we have people talk about what are the specific things you want to do with each of those audiences? So it’s really an exploration of where they’re trying to go with all of those things? And once we get that information back from them, then we start thinking about okay, what are the messages that are going to resonate with these people, what’s going on in their life that matters to them? And how is this organization an important part of their life? And then that that sort of in between today that leaves us with things like interaction design, so on print piece that might be sketching things out, she kind of see where pieces go before you worry too much about the polish of visual design, but if you’re looking at things like a website, obviously user experience design is its own field and latto complexities to it, but understanding how. People move through side understanding the hierarchy of information what’s most important, trying to create experiences that are going to leave different types of people, that information, you know, some people are gonna want to watch a video that’s going to be the first thing they go toe on site. Other people will never watch a video just because they don’t like interacting with websites in that way. So we kind of look at all that stuff, and then it eventually moved into visual design, and when we’re looking at larger project, maybe it’s renaming an organization or maybe an organisation is trying to be the leader in their space about changing the way an entire population thinks about a particular issue, then we’ll often go out and well meet with many, many constituents of that organization, so we might spend a day or multiple days meeting with staff with clients, with partner organizations with a wide variety of people and understanding what their current perception of the organization is, what the ideal organization would look like to them and it’s very interesting, because you often find that there’s contradictions, or you find that there’s a lot of overlap that everybody’s seeing. And you kind of learn where you need to put your energy after that. As you do, these redesign projects, buy-in boardmember sze can sometimes be an obstacle. And you have an article in the chronicle of philanthropy from just last month. On this subject, you, uh, you’re concerned that redesign projects get cem. Participation from people aren’t really qualified. Tio teo comment to the degree they do. Yeah, this is something that we’ve seen, and i hope that, you know, the board members out there don’t don’t feel unappreciated and feel like they’re getting picked on for this and it’s certainly not that way and there’s a lot of great board members who are contributing so much to organizations, but for some reason, what we’ve seen a number of times is that i think because design doesn’t always feel as technical, and i think this is changing as people see how sophisticated design is becoming and hope coming so much, you know, more widespread, i think people views on this air changing, but i think, you know, people have designed opinions that they make every day they have, they’re different some people want this color shoe or that colored clothing or this color car, or they liked the design of this house or not this house. And so as people who have subjective opinions, i think sometimes we feel that, you know, yeah, i i weigh on on on on this logo just like i would weigh in on which car i want to buy, and maybe they don’t always realize that there’s a lot of thought. That goes into that, and so some of the things i was touching on in that article was that we’ve seen processes get derailed at the end, where we’ve put a lot of time and energy working with an organization, they’ve had a team from the beginning, we’ve really gone through this process that we just described of understanding the goals and the audiences, and then toward the end of that time, someone might jump in and just thrown opinion out there that they don’t like a particular color or style without really understanding where we’re trying to go. And, you know, there’s a lot of other psychological factors in there, too, and i don’t know we have a lot of time to get into all of them, but some things just like, you know, people, sometimes i feel like they want something new, and then when it actually comes time to get something new, they’re a little worried what they’re going to lose because there’s a lot of equity and history and what in their existing brand, no fear is like that, and you have an interesting analogy that you wouldn’t find this level of interference if it was. A financial consultant and financial advisor and a ah ah financial plan was being presented to the board. Yeah, i think that’s, right? And i think that something like finances seem very technical and tender, not get the same issue. Hopefully, hopefully, this is changing. I don’t. Do you believe it is? Do you see this? Changing that design is getting more respect and for the art and science that it is? Absolutely. When we started our company just about five years ago, our conversations were always having to convince the social sector organizations why design was so important and show them how the private sector is using it. Why it matters. And we rarely have to have that conversation anymore. We see that people just get that designed the critical part of the successful organization. And what what can we suggest that could help overcome the the obstacles of last minute changes in criticisms, et cetera from the board? Well, they approached that we usually take is we try to create a framework, especially on larger design projects on smaller ones. You sometimes don’t get this much. But when you’re doing something like renaming an organization or changing its logo things that are i feel very foundational people are very attached to it. We like to create a framework where we say here’s our goals and here’s what we’re trying to do in any designs could go through that. So if someone suggests the change, we should say, okay, well, let us know how that change is going to help us achieve our goals, and sometimes that will help that person articulate why they’re change is important, and everyone else will get to see why they should listen to them, and other times the person will say, well, you know what? This was actually just an opinion of mine, and i can’t really just buy-in might say, well, maybe maybe we don’t need to make that change that, and it gives them a little better way to have that conversation. And if that person had been involved early in the process, their opinion could have been assimilated in yeah, exactly. And that’s, one of the things we say in the article, you know, if you can figure out who our decision makers who are going to be weighing in who have the power to derail something if they’re not involved certainly try to involve that as early as possible, so their concerns could be built into the process that address, if we have a limited budget, which a lot of non-profits do, how can we prioritised what, what, where we should spend our money in in design? Durney yeah, i get this question a lot on dh it’s either that question or more one which is, you know, with our limited budget where’s, the best place we can go to for design, and i think, you know, there’s always going to be certain things like you get what you pay for, and i think there’s other areas where you can cut some corners and still have a pretty good job, so there’s product tie solutions that are out there, so when we have organizations that come to us and their budget is nowhere near what we tend to work with, we point them towards something like a a template for a sight like square space where they’ve got pre built websites for somebody and that’s something it’s not going to be incredibly unique, you can’t do everything you want with it, but if you’re just starting out, if i not be the best idea to invest your entire budget into building the most beautiful worksite ever as much as we like doing that work and wanted to see that that’s not necessarily where you need to go. And i think in terms of prioritizing which kind of designed, it goes back to strategy for me, it’s understanding, you know, where are the points that really matter for some organization? If going after their clients rarely involves any kind of digital interaction, and they get most of their money from a single foundation that they apply for through a grant or they get it through high net worth individuals that they go and talk to in person, then they probably don’t need to be spending all of their money on the website when they really is not responsible for them to do that, but they don’t have the funds. So i think, it’s just understanding, you know, just asking those questions about what really matters. Where do people get that information? And then that will hopefully guide them to make those choices is obviously a little bit hard to answer general question like that specifically, but i think, you know there’s a lot of ways to think about that. You gave it your best shot. It was admirable on dh valuable. We just have a couple of minutes left about a minute and a half or so you have a theory about why charity water is gets so much attention is talked about so much. Yeah, it’s really funny almost every non-profit conference to go to our design is mentioned, they’re brought up. I think they’ve made design of priority from day one and they’ve really invested in it, and all of their materials was really beautiful and they just create really great work. And unfortunately, and this is, you know, one of the things we try to address every day the social sector has been a little bit behind some other things were maybe there’s more resource is there may be people have understood the importance of design a little bit earlier, you know, i think when people look for really great examples of design, charity water is one of the ones that they are able to find that consistently does a good job. Matthew, just about a minute we have left would you tell me what it is? That you love about the work that you do. Yeah, i mean, great to do work where you feel like you’re making a difference in the world, and i think we have a skill our team does that so many organizations need and it’s just a great environment to get to be around people every day who are doing this kind of work, and then for us internally to get to be around people who want to put their energy and disporting these kind of organizations and it’s great to see that that’s what people have chosen to investor energy mathos scharpnick you’ll find him on twitter at mat sharp s ch aarp and the company is elephant e l e f i nt designs matthew. Thank you so, so much. Thank you. My pleasure. Have you, tony, take two and amy sample ward on design strategy are next. First generosity siri’s you know them? They talk about well, i talk about them. They host multi charity five k runs and walks. That means if you’re small, shop isn’t going to get enough runners. Tau host your own event because you can’t have twenty, twenty five people on ghost. Ah ah! Run around that you work with generosity, siri’s. And they bring a bunch of small and midsize shops together, and then you have three hundred fifty or four hundred runners and walkers and you have a great event. You have fun, yeah fund-raising you have community small shops coming together, i’ve hosted a couple of their rmc together, i should say a couple of their runs and i’m doing another one that’s coming up in brooklyn in a month or so, and besides brooklyn, they have one coming up in northern new jersey and also miami, florida talk to dave lin. You know, i like to pick up the phone and talk to people. Pick up the phone. He’s the c e o tell him you’re from non-profit radio seven one eight five o six. Nine triple seven yes, they have a beautifully strategically designed website. Also, of course generosity. Siri’s dot com. I did a stand up comedy gig last month in new york city. Your basic stories of unrequited to seventh grade love and revenge and dating and law school. The video is at tony martignetti dot com couple more np valentine’s that i saw this morning from past guest professor brian mittendorf at binghamton university. In upstate new york, which is not far from our affiliate, geneva community radio on seneca lake, brian writes, dear valentine with you, i always have donorsearch vise dh fun. All right, professor mittendorf that’s like that’s like a b plus or so it’s. Probably only a b but there’s a lot of subjectivity in greeting. So go for the b plus i saw one from suzanne perry the very instant that i saw you. My heart. Oh, sorry. The very instant that i saw you. Did my heart want to do a randomized controlled trial to show our love would be effective? The’s mp valentine’s are the brainchild of the chronicle of philanthropy. They are at philanthropy on twitter. Of course, lots of people know that, and i think amy sample word is going to share a couple of mp valentine’s. Also, that is tony’s take two for friday, thirteenth of february sixth show of this year. Amy sample ward you know her she’s with us often because she’s, our social media contributor, and she’s also the ceo of intend the non-profit technology network, our most recent co authored book is social change anytime everywhere about online multi-channel engagement. Her blob is amy sample, war dot or ge, and on twitter she’s at amy r s ward the arm’s for rene welcome back, amy sample ward, thank you for having me happy friday the thirteenth thank you. Happy friday to you and happy valentine’s day. You don’t want to get a shot of valentine’s day is also oregon’s birthday is it really organs birthday? Oh, how cool, then why don’t you give a special shout out to our new affiliate? Km jozy down in salem and kaiser awesome! I am so excited about that. I’m going to send them on twitter, valentine actually very thoughtful because you’re in portland and they’re in there and down in the mid willamette valley. How far is that from you? Well, lam it lam it. Oh, thank you very much. You corrected me on oregon years ago. I know now. It’s, oregon. We’ll lam it there in the mid well, willamette valley. How far is that from you in in portland, portland’s? Kind of the top of the willamette corridor. So the kind of the next three hour drive south. Okay, they’re in the mid well amit corridor talking like an oregonian. We’re going to do my best anyway, you have this little report that you intend was involved with on on digital strategy. Once you acquaint us with this twenty fifteen digital integration and outlook report, sure. So this just launch publicly yesterday. Twenty fifteen digital outlook report and folks can download it from the web for free. We partnered with care too, and h j c and it was a bit of a balding conversation is all research projects are. But the original impetus was trying to figure out as this conversation even the conversation with matt, the first half of the show around digital strategies and multi-channel campaigns and all those things, they really they really require people from all across an organization. Often they tackle all different channels there. Normally, you know, a big strategy and lots of tactics to get there. And we wanted to figure out what that looked like in practice in organizations. What is it? What does it mean to staff and train your staff for that kind of approach? So from there we created this survey, like i said would care to an h j c looking at staffing, looking at what? Those strategies. Are but then also, you know, what are your challenge is to doing this well, or to prioritizing this kind of, you know approach. And there are some things that i thought, you know, i totally would have bet on those being the answers, and they came out that way. And there are other things that i was surprised by. So it’s it’s, a pretty interesting report will, of course, have ah, webinar and other opportunities to discuss the report, but excited to share it first. Here. Thank you very much. Cool. Um, what was the was the report proofread? Yes, it was ok. Well, by about six people. Two times. Okay, well, that’s, you have edit well, there’s a there’s. A spelling mistake on page twenty three. I feel obliged to point that out, even though so even though we have a flawed report here. Well, i guess you and i will still spend time talking about it. But check page twenty three year okay, what’s the spelling mistake. Oh, you want the exact let’s? See it’s? Ah, the word constraints is misspelled in the graphic. I’m sorry. We’ll continue anyway. Well, i like it, okay, i don’t think that i don’t think it impacts the overarching messages of the report, but i don’t know. I feel compelled to point that out. Let’s. See you. Staffing is staffing is very interesting. What the positions that people had, who filled out the survey, meaning they’re the ones who were involved in the digital work of the organization. Yeah, i mean, i think that first, you know, at inten, we always talk about how technology in the most general sense is used by every person in the organization, right? Every every team, every individual has certain tools that they need to do their job, and we want technology training and recognition, you know, to be all the way across an organization on something that i thought was interesting about this is we do see, you know, different departments and different teams responding that they’re managing in this work, but that seventy percent were what what normally i would consider to be a leadership level staff percent on executive director or a director manager, you know, of a team seventy percent of the folks who are responsible for this work are that leadership level, which i think reinforces that it’s not about the tactical decisions of what do we post on facebook, but really trying to bring that hyre strategic perspective and, you know, kind of umbrella plan geever says getting deep in the weeds of of twitter, facebook or email marketing, so i thought that was a really positive sign, okay? And it’s ah, cuts across lots of different fields are positions. I guess directors and managers and and and specialists is actually just kind of small. It’s like only eleven. Roughly eleven percent specializing? Yeah, and consultants is the smallest, just under four percent. Yes, yes. Interesting. All right, yeah. I think that’s definitely been a shift it’s something that i saw, you know, maybe ten, fifteen years ago, as the kind of traditional department was an outsourced consultant roll. Someone would come in and make sure the servers were running and the website was up and that kind of thing. And over time, of course, organizations recognized how much work there was in that, and it made those official staff rolls. And now we’re seeing that with more of the digital strategy worked as well, that that may be used to be handed off to an outside consultant. And now we’re realizing that we’re doing it every day, and it needs to be part of staff. I saw that a lot of organizations that i participated or under a million dollars in in operating budget, thirty seven percent. You are up to two million dollars. So yeah, i mean most. I mean, many organizations are under five hundred thousand? I mean, just in the us. At least this report went to canadian organizations and tio us organizations. But that kind of distribution of the sector is that of course, most are smaller, right? And i wantto make make sure people understand that this is not, you know, done by large organizations. In fact, the you know, the like, the five million to ten million dollars category is only is even under twelve percent. So yep. Okay, what else did you see that it’s interesting in this in the report? Well, one thing that is just it touch a little bit more on the staffing piece that there’s. Um, well, we’ll kind of touch on this later too, but there’s a note about someone being completely focused, someone that’s, a dedicated staff person managing the digital strategy for the organisation versus that maybe being a distributed role depending on what the campaign is are, you know what work needs to be done? And the correlation there is that the more total staff you have an organization, the hyre the probability that there is a dedicated person for digital strategy, which i think way could’ve all you know made that logical step so less than a quarter’s twenty four percent of organizations that have ten, staff, people or fewer have a dedicated person managing the digital strategy, but when you go to that next kind of braque and eleven eleven staff to fifty staff, a little bit more of a medium sized organization, that twenty four percent jumps up to fifty eight percent and, you know, going over fifty staff, it goes up even higher. Andi, i offer that up as a reminder that, you know, a lot of organizations don’t have a dedicated person managing digital strategy, which we could talk about challenges about later, but i think at least it and ten, i hear that a lot people saying, well, we don’t have someone that, you know, it’s their job to manage this, so we can’t be expected to do it. Well, i think a lot of organizations are in that boat where they don’t have a staff person managing the digital strategy, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have a digital strategy. It just means that it needs maybe to be a more collaborative process to manage. Okay. Excellent. Is this an annual report? Uh this is the first time we’ve done it, but we do hope to do it at the beginning of each year going forward so we can try and see if there’s trends especially around, you know, emerging channels that people may be focused on for the year. Okay, seems like a pretty serious undertaking do annually. Okay. Yeah, well, and ten is a serious organization e on and i think there’s e i mean it’s. Why we do many of our reports every year. Because even if it’s not the same exact respondents and of course wait tried leah’s clears, we can that this is a snapshot. It’s not a scientific reports, of course, based on who responds each year. But there is there is value in being able to ask the same questions publicly year over year and see how responses change. You asked a bunch of questions about what, what organization is going to be focusing on in twenty fifteen and lots of lots of visual answers? Yeah, i thought it was, um i thought there were some answers here that were surprising and some here that we’re not surprising at all. So we asked folks, what content? Types or channels, they may be increasing their focus on or keeping the same focus or decreasing focus on and the top three that it counts. You know, if you count increasing, or at least stay in the same with focus are, you know, in the ninety five percent or hyre range are all rich media. So their videos, their images and their infographics, which i think i mean again, i know that those are really compelling content types and, you know, people really love to be able to share that kind of content, but i was surprised that it was, you know, ninety five percent or hyre that people were going to maintain or increase their focus on those and tio emphasize something that matthew made clear and that you have made clear many, many times before you embark on something like this, you need to have your strategy in place. Why are you? Why are you in? Why do you want to do an infographic? What right? I mean, what what can we do with video that we’re not? We’re not currently doing and how does it how does it serve our constituents? Exactly? And what? What is that video going to do for you, i mean a video in and of itself isn’t reason to create one. So video images infographics, even though those air the three highest as faras maintainer increase our focus on the peace is right behind that include email marketing, blog’s guest articles on your ah, you know website or blogged etcetera. So i think those pieces serve as the kind of channel or or reinforcement for those three top piece is the videos and images and infographics so that you’re creating that rich super share a ble content, right. Everybody wants to share that info graphic on facebook or or whatever, and you’re going to be sharing embedding those in email marketing in your blog’s in guest articles that you’re, you know, posting on other people’s websites. So i thought that made sense that those followed right behind. I have to go away for a couple minutes. When we come back, amy and i are going to keep talking about the twenty fifteen digital integration and outlook report. Be with us. Like what you’re hearing a non-profit radio tony’s got more on youtube, you’ll find clips from stand up comedy tv spots and exclusive interviews catch guests like seth gordon. Craig newmark, the founder of craigslist marquis of eco enterprises, charles best from donors choose dot org’s aria finger, do something that worked neo-sage levine from new york universities heimans center on philantech tony tweets to he finds the best content from the most knowledgeable, interesting people in and around non-profits to share on his stream. If you have valuable info, he wants to re tweet you during the show. You can join the conversation on twitter using hashtag non-profit radio twitter is an easy way to reach tony he’s at tony martignetti narasimhan t i g e n e t t i remember there’s a g before the end he hosts a podcast for the chronicle of philanthropy fund-raising fundamentals is a short monthly show devoted to getting over your fund-raising hartals just like non-profit radio, toni talks to leading thinkers, experts and cool people with great ideas. As one fan said, tony picks their brains and i don’t have to leave my office fund-raising fundamentals was recently dubbed the most helpful non-profit podcast you have ever heard. You can also join the conversation on facebook, where you can ask questions before or after the show. The guests were there, too. Get insider show alerts by email, tony tells you who’s on each week and always includes link so that you can contact guest directly. To sign up, visit the facebook page for tony martignetti dot com. Duitz we will update that drop because jan eggers hasn’t been with blackbaud for a long, long time, but when she was, she was obviously a non-profit radio fan and i interviewed her let’s, go abroad with live listener love seoul, south korea anya haserot beijing, china is with us ni hao and mishima japan konnichi wa bringing it back to the u s falls church, virginia, locust grove, virginia, new york, new york woodbridge, new jersey. Thank you, woodbridge, devon, pennsylvania, potomac, marilyn st louis, missouri couple in south san francisco, california more than one thank you let’s cruise s new mexico welcome! I’ve listened to you last cruises that was but that’s that’s, one of our listeners of the weak and i’m sorry, i can’t remember which one which one of our live listeners from las cruzes tweet me and i’ll shut you out! Use the hashtag non-profit radio, honolulu, hawaii, ellicott city, maryland, los angeles, california and we have a bunch of masked us listeners also, i don’t know if that’s intentional or unintentional. I watched the movie screening citizenfour last night about the edward snowden story so it could be unintentional masking that’s a very good film. By the way, citizenfour? Any sample ward? You’re still with us, right? Even though i’m chattering away? Of course i am. I’m i was actually thinking of citizen for when you announced that there are a number of folks masking and call listening into the show on dh then you set it. We’re having a brunch, a brain melt. Ah, exactly. And so have you seen citizen for i have. Yeah. You know, i have a very poignant story about that. The scanning the screening i went to last night was that here in new york city, the i f c and by much independent channel’s studio or something down on sixth have and it was with edward snow. We had edward snowden in bye bye video and also allow laura poitras, the director of the film, and glenn greenwald. The journalist obviously was working so closely with glen, and it was all hosted by david carr, the new york times media media journalists. And then he went to the new york times office last night after this live panel and he died. I saw it on. I saw i got i got an alert. Yeah, he died right after. He died in the new york times office. It’s incredible. Oh, my god. Yeah, yeah. David carr c a r r xero obituary in the times today, right after he hosted this, he went back to the office, and then he was found there last last night. Like the nine o’clock tonight. I know it was really it was really chilling. Oh, my. I was so sorry, andi. I saw him at his last live appearance hosting this panel around the citizen for on and how was that panel? So david was there in person, but other people were on skype for only only on ly. Edward snowden was remote. Glenn greenwald and laura poitras. She’s a director. The film. They were both live with him. It we roll in the theater at the i f c center. Yeah, it was very, very good. How is the discussion? Oh, excellent. You know, people are concerned about asking laura and glenn about their their own feelings about being back in the u s and their reluctance to come back. Uh, after all this broke, this all broke around. It was june twenty thirteen that’s with the three of them. Poitras. Greenwald. And snowden had a week in hong kong, which is when the story’s first came out. They first met him. Face-to-face. Right. Then, june twenty third, june thirteen. So they were talking about what was it like to come back to the us after that? What she has planned. There’s, another film planned about other whistle blowers. That’s, the films she was working on when this one broke, and she she put citizenfour ahead of it. Yeah, really. It’s it’s ah, it’s, really very good. And who? The thing last night, i just couldn’t get over when i woke up this morning and saw the obituary. Um, yeah, that’s, just incredible. Let’s, let’s talk about some of the other things where people are focusing in twenty fifteen also ranked high were case studies, twitter chats and marketing automation. What what does that one mean? Marketing automation? Oh, well, it can mean, you know, different things. Oh, of course, every organization brings its own understanding that definition to automation, but i’ll share some examples from antenna, so they’re rooted, at least in reality, that i can talk about. And for us, marketing automation means ah, focus on or a lot of trust in data that we can use to welcome new people to the community, to encourage communication to encourage, you know, joining or renewing all of those pieces. So when i say trusting and relying on data, i mean that we have set up our systems so that say, tony, you come to the website and you decide to sign up for one of our webinars are online education programs and it’s the first time you’ve ever come to intend so we see in the database here’s this new contact tony martignetti and we also see that the way you came in, the way you became a new contact is by registering for an event. So that kicks you in essentially to an automated marketing kind of system. So instead of getting eso se damn your host for the show, sam also come wait. Hold on comes in because he joined an online community group. Hold on, hold on. Tony martignetti is the host of the show. Sam sam is our producer, our line producer. Sorry, producer recording. Martignetti is the host. What? I don’t believe it buy-in i mean that he’s physically your host. You are teo that’s. What? You are you sure? Okay. So? So you and sam come down on the same day, entered the database the same day, but but tony’s record says you came for educational program and sam’s records says he came for a community group. So you each start getting messages that are you? No one is right away. Message one is about a week later. One is after that etcetera that are tailored on that entry point. So, tony, your follow-up message is going to say, you know, oh, my gosh, we know that you’re here to learn. And here are more ways that you can keep learning with an ten whereas sam’s isn’t goingto make that assumption because he didn’t sign up for an educational program instead, his is going to say, oh, wow, you’re here to meet people and network and find a community. Here are more ways you can do that on dh towards the end of that series. Of course, you can start broadening what you’re showcasing, you know? Hey, if if you want to do something more than learned tony here, all different things we have and sam here, if you want to do more than join a community group, here are other ways that you can get involved, but that way staff are not storming through the database every single day. Okay, who’s, a new education contact who’s, a new newsletter contact but the system is set up with those messages crafted dynamically to just go out on their own. All right, amy, unfortunately have to leave it there. The the full report is the twenty fifteen digital integration and outlook report our social media manager, susan chavez tweeted out where you can find the report and there’s obviously a lot more there and final message just because something is a strategic focus area for other non-profits doesn’t mean it’s right? For you, you’ve got to think about the strategy and how whether it really makes sense for you. Amy sabat what? I’m going to see you. It non-profit technology conference. I can’t wait. I know people should goto n ten dot or ge go to the non-profit technology conference ntcdinosaur b on the science fair floor, interviewing lots and lots of the speakers from that conference at that conference and i will see you there, amy next week. Gene takagi are legal contributor returns. Very smart guy. Why w c a monterey county our listeners of the week thank you so, so much. If you missed anything on today’s show finding at tony martignetti dotcom are creative producer is claire meyerhoff. Sam liebowitz is our line producer. Sam is the line producer of the show, not the host shows social media’s by susan chavez. Susan chavez dot com on our music is by scott stein. I hope you’ll be with me next week for big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent go out and be great. What’s not to love about non-profit radio tony gets the best guests check this out from seth godin this’s the first revolution since tv nineteen fifty and henry ford nineteen twenty it’s the revolution of our lifetime here’s a smart, simple idea from craigslist founder craig newmark yeah insights, orn presentation or anything? People don’t really need the fancy stuff they need something which is simple and fast. When’s the best time to post on facebook facebook’s andrew noise nose at traffic is at an all time hyre on nine a m or eight pm so that’s, when you should be posting your most meaningful post here’s aria finger ceo of do something dot or ge young people are not going to be involved in social change if it’s boring and they don’t see the impact of what they’re doing. So you got to make it fun and applicable to these young people look so otherwise a fifteen and sixteen year old they have better things to do if they have xbox, they have tv, they have their cell phones. Me dar is the founder of idealist took two or three years for foundation staff to sort of dane toe. Add an email address their card it was like it was phone. This email thing is fired-up that’s why should i give it away? Charles best founded donors choose dot or ge somehow they’ve gotten in touch kind of off line as it were on dno, two exchanges of brownies and visits and physical gift mark echo is the founder and ceo of eco enterprises. You may be wearing his hoodies and shirts. Tony talked to him. Yeah, you know, i just i’m a big believer that’s not what you make in life. It sze, you know, tell you make people feel this is public radio host majora carter. Innovation is in the power of understanding that you don’t just do it. You put money on a situation expected to hell. You put money in a situation and invested and expected to grow and savvy advice for success from eric sabiston. What separates those who achieve from those who do not is in direct proportion to one’s ability to ask others for help. The smartest experts and leading thinkers air on tony martignetti non-profit radio big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent.

Nonprofit Radio for February 6, 2015: Corporate Coffers & Committee Confab

Big Nonprofit Ideas for the Other 95%

I Love Our Sponsor!

Sponsored by Generosity Series, a nationwide series of multi-charity 5K events that provide a proven peer-to-peer fundraising platform to charities and an amazing experience for their participants.

Sign-up for show alerts!

Listen Live or Archive:

My Guests:

Linda LysakowskiCorporate Coffers

Linda Lysakowski smallLinda Lysakowski, ACFRE, is a development consultant with nearly 30 years of experience. She wants you to systematize and formalize your corporate appeals; pay attention to small companies; and be more strategic with cultivation.

 

 

 

Gene TakagiCommittee Confab

Gene TakagiGene Takagi returns. He’s our legal contributor and principal of the Nonprofit & Exempt Organizations law group (NEO). He’s all about committees this month! How are board committees different than advisory committees? How much authority should be delegated to them? What are the pros and cons of executive committees?

 

 


Top Trends. Sound Advice. Lively Conversation.

You’re on the air and on target as I delve into the big issues facing your nonprofit—and your career.

If you have big dreams but an average budget, tune in to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.

I interview the best in the business on every topic from board relations, fundraising, social media and compliance, to technology, accounting, volunteer management, finance, marketing and beyond. Always with you in mind.

Sign-up for show alerts!

Sponsored by: GenEvents logo
View Full Transcript

Transcript for 226_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150206.mp3

Processed on: 2018-11-11T23:27:16.751Z
S3 bucket containing transcription results: transcript.results
Link to bucket: s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/transcript.results
Path to JSON: 2015…02…226_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150206.mp3.251913321.json
Path to text: transcripts/2015/02/226_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150206.txt

Hello and welcome to tony martignetti non-profit radio big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent. I’m your aptly named host. Welcome again to our new affiliate km use e eighty eight point five and one hundred point seven fm in salem and keizer, oregon non-profit radio for the capital and kaiser km jozy, thank you very much for being with us. We’ve got a listener of the week. Jenny are nez she’s, a huge supporter of non-profit radio on twitter, always recommending the show and sharing our tweets she’s at jenny or nez jenny, i’ll send you a video of the non-profit radio library. You pick a book and it’s yours. Congratulations on being our listener of the week jenny are nez which it’s kind of reminds me of dizzy yarn is from the i love lucy show. I don’t know. I wonder if that’s a granddaughter are you are you the granddaughter of dizzy? Have a show from the archive today? And a rich archive. It is here’s our february seventh twenty fourteen show i’ll be back at the end. Hello and welcome to tony martignetti non-profit radio big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent. I’m your aptly named host. Oh, i’m very glad you’re with me. I’d suffer the embarrassment of a calcula if i had to shoulder the burden of knowing that you were going to miss this week’s show corporate coffers. Linda, listen kowski a c f r ee is a development consultant with nearly thirty years of experience. She wants you to systematize and formalize your corporate appeals. Pay attention to small companies and be more strategic with cultivation and committee. Khanfar ab jean takagi is back he’s, our legal contributor and principal of the non-profit and exempt organizations law group neo is all about committees this month. How are bored? Tum it he’s different than advisory committees. How much authority should be delegated to them? And what are the pros and cons of executive committees between the guests? Antony’s, take two. I have an abundance of alliteration were brought to you by rally bound peer-to-peer fund-raising and by telephone bill reduction consulting t brc. Getting your money back from phone bill screwups. My pleasure to welcome to the show, linda. Like kowski, she is one of one hundred professionals worldwide. Toe hold the advanced certified fund-raising executive designation. She has thirty years in non-profit development and one of her many books is raised more money from your business community. She’s at linda lissa kowski dot com you could follow her on twitter where she’s at l listen, kowski llc linda lisa caskey, welcome thanks, tony it’s. Glad i’m glad to be here happy to be with your audience today. Thank you very much. I’m glad you are too, and i i think it’s safe for me to speak for them to them, for them that that they’re glad you’re here too. Tell me about this cfr lots of lots of people are cf ari’s certified fund-raising executive, but you’re in advanced certified fund-raising executive, right and the uncertified fund-raising executive i used to be able to say i was one of fewer than one hundred, but just recently, within the last couple of months, we accepted number ninety nine and number one hundred into the fold um and it’s really an honor to be counted among the cfr ese it’s, a long, grueling process, but i think it’s well worth it in the end, it’s it’s a process that you go through if you’re really dedicated to this profession and one hundred of us at least are. And you have to be invited. Teo too do the work to get the a before your cf, ari. Well, the process is that you have to be a c f ar e already. Andi, i have been in the profession ten years or more. And then what makes us a little bit different from the cfr e to see if our reprocesses you take an exam and the review committee looks at your exam and make sure there’s no ethical violations on your record and then you’re automatically approved with e f r ee it’s really a four step process? It’s the application itself, and then you do take a written exam, which is obviously a little bit harder than the cfr e exam. And then you put together a portfolio showing your work and at least two a p f r ee piers will review that portfolio and then the third part of the fourth part of the process is on aural exam. Where again, about three, of your peers will take you through about a three hour process where you give your oral answers to questions that are thrown at. You by this group sametz pretty grueling process. Ok, i happen to be a u a c f r ee ultra advanced there’s there’s. Only one of us, though. I know that that’s. Pretty cool. I guess i’m gonna have to try to get to be number two in that group. Well, i don’t think you’re qualified. I’m sorry. Probably not. It’s the next level up, but it sze very secretive, like the masons for, like free masons. Usc fr ee. Okay, so i have to learn a secret handshake that well, if you’re qualified, but i don’t believe that you are. I’m sorry. Okay, okay. We’re talking about corporate giving. And specifically, i think small companies, but but before we get into big versus small there’s lots of forms of corporate giving, right, but it’s way beyond just just money. Yes, yes, there is. You know? And i think sometimes we kind of forget the many ways that corporations who contribute to the non-profit world besides e-giving cash, which most of us are familiar with cash or grant there is in-kind there’s corporate volunteer programs, which can be really magnificent for a lot of organizations. And some corporations like to do sponsorship? Not so much of sponsorship of events, but other sponsorship may be sponsoring one of your program. Something like that. So there’s a whole variety of pockets you khun delve into? Yeah, there’s also giving of inventory, right? Gif ts in-kind right. Right. Ok. And i’ve had some clients really be very successful with gifts. In-kind i could also tell you a bunch of horror stories about gifts and well, okay, we’ll hold the heart stories, but just, uh well, maybe, but we know that just want to set the ground work. We know there’s lots of different ways that we could be approaching cos on dh. You also want people to think broadly about the kinds of companies they approach you. We’ll identify a lot of under the radar businesses, right? Right. And i think a lot of times we tend to always look at those the company’s in our community whether their banks are hi tech companies. But there’s, every community has a couple companies that everybody thinks someone that’s like. Okay, how can we raise some money from the business sector? And they all tend to think of a big company. I called the willie sutton theory that’s probably because i spent a lot of years in banking before i was involved in the nonprofit world, but, you know, they one day it’s really sudden white, he robbed banks, and he said, because that’s, where the money is and sometimes that’s the impression that we get some of those big companies but us for all the money is i am to live near las vegas and in our community, it’s, let’s go after the big casinos because, look, i have all this money, and we just kind of roll up with our little plastic cup and asked him to fill it with money, and it doesn’t always work that easy, right? So let’s, identify some of the, uh, the under under the radars and you like your name, like pest control movers, landscapers, right? Small, small companies that are often get overlooked by the way that that willie sutton story according to wikipedia, he didn’t really say that. That’s a pocketful. You know, i just heard that recently to that it was actually a reporter who described that statement to him, but by still called the willie sutton xero describe doing me, whether he said it or not, that’s hard. I don’t think we’ll take away your cfr designation because i hope not it’s, not that that’s not really an ethical breach. It’s, just a little fib a little fairy town not doesn’t reach the eye to the level of ethical oversight, i guess in the next edition of the book will have to say that statement was described to willie said it or not, ok, let’s, talk about some of that well, how to get started with this. I mean, i would think now we have lots of different sized companies on. We have lots of different ways that we can approach various sized companies, so that creates a lot of variables. Should we be starting with what our goals are? Starting with goals is always important. Looking at how many companies, realistically or in your community, how many you think you might be able to reach and that’s going to be based a lot on how many staff and or volunteers you have to reach out to the business community. And i really stressed the word volunteers because sometimes staff people think they have to do this all by themselves and i have found that the best way to reach the corporate sector is tohave appear make that peer-to-peer solicitation. So if you have volunteers on your board, your development committee, ah, a special committee that set up just to do a corporate animal appeal, you’ll be able to use what i call the five to one rule, and this is a pretty common thing and fund-raising that no one volunteer is to make more than five calls when you’re talking about going out, personally visiting with someone and that’s what we’re talking about because personal solicitation is really the only way to get to the corporate community. I find direct mail doesn’t work, and most of the time, phone calls don’t work because the decision makers don’t take phone calls or open mail, okay, you through a lot of stare in terms of volunteers and how to approach and whether events versus one on one is best, so we’re gonna unpack that we’re going to take a break for a couple minutes when we come back. Linda and i well, keep talking about corporate coffers, stay with us. You’re tuned to non-profit radio. Tony martignetti also hosts a podcast for the chronicle of philanthropy fund-raising fundamentals is a quick ten minute burst of fund-raising insights, published once a month. Tony’s guests are expert in crowdfunding, mobile giving event fund-raising direct mail and donor cultivation. Really, all the fund-raising issues that make you wonder, am i doing this right? Is there a better way there is? Find the fund-raising fundamentals archive it. Tony martignetti dot com that’s marketmesuite n e t t i remember there’s, a g before the end, thousands of listeners have subscribed on itunes. You can also learn maura, the chronicle website philanthropy dot com fund-raising fundamentals the better way. Welcome back to big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent. Time to send some live listener love stew start domestic new york, new york, minneapolis, minnesota, new bern, north carolina live listener love to you, seoul, korea got many people in seoul and others that are whose city is masked. So soul i wonder if you know the three or four people in seoul who are listening. Or do you ah, do you all know each other? I wonder. Can non-profit radio bring you together in soul? And of course, for our korean listeners on your haserot many in japan, tokyo, ujiie and one or two others were not sure who are who are masked japanese sorry to our japanese listeners. Konnichi wa ok, linda, listen kowski let’s, unpack some of that stuff that you let us into let’s begin with how to approach the companies you you suggest in in your book a cultivation event? Yes, i think cultivation events are a great way to get to know the business leaders and have them get to know you. Lots of times. The organizations think they just go knock on the door or send a letter and suddenly they’re going to raise all this money from the business sector, but these businesses a run by people, we have to remember that, and people need to get to know your organization before they’re going to support it. So i’ve had some very successful cultivation events were business leaders are invited in, always hosted by another business leader not hosted by your executive director or someone within your organization, and i think that’s one of the keys to success here is who does the inviting? I remember one working with the homeless shelter group, and they had a key business leader in their community invite other business leaders in they thought they’d get about twenty, some people, they sent out seventy five invitations, and just about everybody they invited showed up mainly because of the host so that’s a big key teo successful cultivation event. You profile that example in the book and then go a little further and talk about how how moved the breakfast attendees were yes, what we did was we started this it’s seven thirty in the morning and on the east coast, especially of the united states, i think you know, if you want to. Get business leaders have it first thing in the morning because they want to come in, get out there and get back to their office before the day gets away from them. So we had a seven thirty eight, fifty eight, fifteen very brief agenda. We just kind of explained a little bit about what the shelter was homeless shelter, what they did, the thing that really sold these people wasa tour, which was led by a former guest of the shelter who was now gainfully employed at his own apartment. And when he took these business leaders around and show them the shelter and said, i sleep over there in the corner, it really hit home that this organization was doing something valuable for its community, that it was turning people’s lives around, then it was making the business environment better. So of course they were really eager to support the organization, and some of them wanted to write out checks immediately, even though we had said to them, we’re not asking you for money at this event, and we actually didn’t take their money. We said, no, we’re going to come back to you later, but you know we just want you to see the shelter and see what we’re doing here, and it really made a huge impact on that community talking about business leaders, companies, what’s your experience with professional practices like lawyers, maybe dentists, orthodontists i think that’s another category i usually often call it business and professional again. I think the best way to get to doctors is through another doctor in the best way to get the lawyers is through another lawyer. These are all really busy professional people, and they don’t often have a lot of time, but they will make time to speak with a calling. So they the key is getting your volunteers who can open the doors to these people and that’s, how you’re going to be successful and what’s our next step then after this cultivation event, which moves people i love the idea of hosting it on site that’s, that’s just so brilliant instead of having it at a restaurant or a hotel or something, have it. If you have a facility where you can tour people around, i just think that’s a very as is you cited that could be really moving what’s the next step. After the after the event, the events over now, okay, after the event, then one of the things that i suggest people is that they hold an annual corporate appeal involving volunteers, and what we did, for example, with that shelter is the volunteers who were so excited about it a z i said some of them wanted to write out a check, but a lot of them said, hey, when you’re ready to go out and talk to people about contributing to the shelter, count me in. I’m ready. Teo, help you with this project. So we developed a list of volunteers based on that cultivation breakfast and those volunteers all set. Okay, i’ll see these five people. I’ll see those five people. And we organized a really well honed annual corporate appeal and there’s a whole chapter in my book outlined how you go about doing that. It would probably be take up the rest of your show. And maybe the next three shows teo, tell everyone how it worked. But the key is involving volunteers letting them choose who they want to go see and seeing their peers. Because that’s, what gets you in the door and that’s what’s going to get you the money and need a long run? I would like people to know, too, that the book is very detailed in terms of how to go about these steps that has a planning timeline and a sample invitation and a questionnaire for after the after the event. So there’s there’s a lot of good advice in the book and detailed advice and linda, i think, did you wantto offer a listener discount? Tio anyone who’s interested in in the book raised more money from your business community and within the next couple of weeks also have an accompanying workbook being released. Raised more money from your business community this year that gives you step by step directions on and that code. If you go to charity channel dot com and look at the bookstore you just put in the code all lower case linda al i n d a twenty fourteen books and you’ll automatically get a fifteen percent discount not only on that book, but on any other books that you order at the same time. So okay, so you go to charity channel dot com and the code is linda twenty fourteen. Books, right? Okay, usually i like to see that could be non-profit radio or tony rocks or something. But linda, i think of that, linda twenty fourteen books. We’ll work, it’ll get you the fifteen percent. Of course, if used tony rocks, you get thirty five percent, but in, but not this. Not this time around. All right, so we’re talking about volunteers. Volunteers are critical to the success of this. Do we need to train these volunteers? Oh, absolutely. Even though volunteers, maybe sadio i’ve done this a zillion times you went, i sort hesitate to use the word training sometimes because nobody thinks they need training. But we always had a kickoff celebration where we invited all the volunteers to come in. Somebody in the organization made a compelling case for support. And when i worked in the university, for example, we would have a student come in and talk about the fact that they were not there on scholarship. They wouldn’t be able to afford the university. So we have somebody that makes a compelling story for why we’re doing this. Why we’re raising money and then you do need to give people some basic guidelines about you know how to make the call and how to fill out the pledge forms and when to make a report back to you. So it is there’s some work involved in it, but i think it really can be very, very helpful if you can get these volunteers in twos and excited just again remember that these are business people, they don’t want toe meat for three hours at a time, they want to come in, probably first thing in the morning and have a meeting that’s over within about an hour to one hour and a half and make it is easiest possible and keep your timeline short don’t give people a six month time frame. They’re only making five calls, and they should be able to do that and about a six week time frame you recommend ah five call limit because i presume you don’t want people to be overwhelmed by a list of twenty or twenty five names or something. Exactly what happens is some annual we have some over enthusiastic volunteers payable. I know this person and i know that person and give me fifteen or twenty calls, and what happens is they never make any calls because fifteen or twenty just too intimidating, they pull out their list and they say i’ll work on that tomorrow. I don’t have time to think about it today, so give them five it’s a very manageable number. Now i wouldn’t say we never she sometimes we have somebody only make three and that’s fine. If they’re three quality calls, sometimes we have somebody who could do six or seven. But i try to keep it to five to one because that’s a pretty realistic number and it’s proven to work. What if the person comes back and says, i’ve done my five tonight? Can i have five? Five more ready todo eso you will give the more after that don’t always give him five to start with, okay? After they’ve done their initial, they can they can come back for more. Okay. And, uh, and what are they asking in these calls? Well, there you are again, presenting a case for support, which shows that you have various ways that businesses can support you. They can give a gift. They can restrict a gift. Maybe, for example, to scholarships for school. Something like that, they could. Give a gift. In-kind i’ve had some organizations that have been ableto build about a third of their building because they had everything donated from landscaping to excavation to furniture, toe windows to cement so you could get gifts in-kind you can get cash, you can get other volunteer support, but primarily we’re looking at things in effect, the bottom line, so we’re looking at cash and give in-kind mostly. All right, why did you tell one of your gift in-kind disaster stories? If if it’s not too long, well, i could give you a couple of them, just one one took one pick, the most of it was that i think is probably the most interesting one because i live in the state of nevada, i had someone offer, give this wasn’t really a gift. In-kind it was a cash gift, but they had a real struggle was trying to determine if they should take a gift in-kind from a brothel because here, it’s illegal business in many counties so that they’re not offering the gift in-kind are they way? That would really be quite interesting? Yeah, i mean, but gives in-kind i’ve had gifts of land offered which needed a half a million dollars worth of oil remediation that’s a gift in-kind you probably don’t want to take well, yeah, because you don’t want to have contaminated soil. Tohave teo remediated, but you’re glossing over the brothel example, but i we’re going to linger on this for a couple moments. I thought you might find that one interesting. Well, you were right because i go to the lowest common denominator, you know, mike sense of humor’s generally basin lowbrow in the gutter on dh i’m proud of that s o have have you had clients offered gifts from from brothels? I have and some have taken them, and some haven’t, because they said they’re not doing anything illegal in that particular county, but others don’t take them because they feel like it flaunts the mission of their organization. But the key teo give in-kind and unusual gifts like that are you have tohave gift acceptance policies in place that say what you’re going to accept and what you’re not going to accept. Interesting right there is the issue is do we want to take money from organizations that are contrary to what are companies that are contrary to? What our beliefs are, what our mission is about that could apply for, well, really could apply and just about any circumstances, but i’m thinking, particularly of, like domestic violence, possibly or health related charity’s certainly any of the faith based religious charities and that’s where, you know, you really need to be careful about what you’re going tio except and the things that volunteers need to have before they’re asked to go out, make calls, they need to know what kind of gifts you’re going to accept. What other kind of support does the organization have to give? Two volunteers that are making these five calls? Well, i think they need to have some staff that’s going to support these volunteers because volunteers are going to i guarantee there’s a volunteer they’re going to call you. Oh, i’m supposed to make this call today, but i lost my my information that i was because the handout can you send me another fact sheet, or can you send me another pledge card? I don’t have one and i have an appointment this afternoon, those of the kind of things that staff need to be there to support people and i think most importantly what you need to give volunteers as a program that’s worthy of support. If they feel in food that your program is really doing a lot of good in the community, they will be proud to be part of your team that’s going out asking for money so that to me is the most important thing that you need to provide volunteers. How about the chair of this annual business appeal? How do we how do we make sure we have the right chair person? Well, that’s a really important that because you wanna have a chair person that is well respected, well known in the community can command respect is enthusiastic themselves. I had one gentleman wants to volunteer for a volunteer firefighters group, and he showed up at a meeting with and this is a top ceo in the county. He showed up with a fire helmet and red suspenders because he was so into what this would do it. He didn’t even take the time to change that e one to make his commitment well known that he supported the volunteer firefighters. He thought they were doing fantastic work, which they were and his enthusiasm was contagious. Everybody else got excited about the campaign because he was excited about it. Outstanding. Okay, um, we have just a couple minutes left. Linda, tell me what it is that you love about the work that you do and you’ve been doing for for thirty years. I think what i really love the most is being able to help people fulfill their missions and so many of the things that, you know, i can’t just take off and run to africa and help dig wells or do a lot of different things, but i can help people raise the money to do those wonderful things. That’s what i enjoy about it the most. Because when charities come together, they can do when people come together should say into charities they can do enormously good work, that individuals can’t do that government and corporations aren’t suited for right? Absolutely. Ok, linda, listen kowski i want to thank you very much. Why don’t you, uh, remind people how they can get the discount on the book, go to charity channel, dot com and then put in the when you look at the book list, just put it in it’ll ask you if you have a discount code and you put in l i n d a all lower case l i n d a twenty fourteen. Okay, linda, on the strength of this conversation we had, i’m going to promote you to ultra cfr, so you are now right? Well, thank you. I’m going to put that in front of my initial see if anybody recognizes thie organization is small but distinguished, you’re now you’re now using new a c f o r e. You will find linda, listen kowski at linda lacey kowski dot com, and on twitter she’s at l lacey kowski llc, thanks so much for sharing your expertise, linda. Thank you, tony, for having me, it’s been a pleasure. Okay, bye! So long. We are sponsored by rally bound. You know them? You’ve heard me talk about them. They do software for peer-to-peer fund-raising at rally bound dot com. And we’re also sponsored by t b r c telephone bill reduction consulting. And they find errors in phone bills when ah, the phone company has charged you for things that you didn’t ask for or overcharged you from what you were quoted, they will find those errors and ah, get reparation. Get money back for you. Who needs that fancy word? Reparation that’s not it’s. Not really. Even a reparation. They get your money back from the from the greedy phone company that miss build you and they’re being they’re at t brc dot com the the show segments today corporate coffers and committee conned fab remind me of a ah, a bit. That was on the johnny carson show in nineteen sixty eight and johnny’s guest was jack webb. He was the star in creator, a creator of the nineteen fifties and sixties tv show dragnet and his character on the show was lieutenant joe friday. So i want to play this for you from johnny carson show nineteen sixty eight my name’s. Friday. I’m a cop. I was working general robbery when i got a call from the acme school bell company. They’re gonna rob, been a robbery. Guess what, my clappers. Yeah, your flowers. Yeah, you know, sings inside of falik makes a claim. The players that’s, right? We got on clappers in business, okay, hyre what’s that things are not going back. What kind of plans were stolen on this case or copper clappers? Where were they? Osili you have any ideas who might have taken the copper clappers from the plaza? Well, there’s one, i fired-up manage where he’d get even. What was his name? Latto cooper. You think that’s, right? I think what? Cooper got my cover. You know, with his plot, cooper is from, yeah, cleveland. Yeah, things. What makes it worse. They were clean, clean, copper clappers, right, what do you think? Cleveland’s plug cooper would come pure clean cover covers. Only one reason. What’s that. He’s a kleptomaniac. Over discovered the copper clappers were coming. My cleaning woman, clifford. That figures see if i got the facts straight here. Player clipper discovered your old copper clappers kept in a closet. We’re coming by. Clark cooper. The kleptomaniac from upleaf kayman now is that about. Latto what’s that fiver text. But romania. Claude hooper, from cleveland kopperman clean copper clappers, were kept in the closet. Yes, back-up clobbering. Excellent. Nineteen. Sixty eight. Johnny carson and jack webb. That is tony’s take two for friday, seventeenth of february sixth show of the year. Jean takagi is back. He’s a manager. Tony, you know what to say. Hello, eugene. Look, the guy doesn’t even know the protocol has done this. I don’t know forty times or something. Hang on there, gene. But hello, gina’s managing attorney of neo the non-profit and exempt organizations law group in san francisco. He edits the popular non-profit law blawg dot com and is gi tak at g tack on twitter hello jean takagi it’s been nearly that’s, right? Your it’s, your excitement, enthusiasm i it’s exudes the audience and the and the guests. We can’t help it. Okay, we’re talking about committees this week. You are concerned that whether where you’re questioning whether there should even be bored committees right aboard doesn’t necessarily have tohave committees. I’m just questioning the concept of whether every non-profit should have committees, and particularly for small non-profits with small boards of directors, committee’s may make sense, and sometimes they may not make sense, but there are a lot of kind of misconceptions about whether you have tohave committees. Okay. And what what is what governs? Whether you, whether you have to or not, basically, i mean, you know, the usefulness of a committee is where aboard has got a lot to two, got a lot of governance responsibilities, and they may want to delegate some of those off two smaller groups that might be able to address the civic issues with more focused expert teeth. And, you know, it may be particularly helpful to be able to recruit persons outside of the board, to participate in committees as well. So those are good reasons for having committees but it’s not a good reason to have a committee if you largely just bring people in without much direction. They sit around talking, you know, come up with a few pieces of advice and share it with the board, who sort of disregard that advice and decides on their own what to do. And a lot of committee members feel very disempowered and not very productive or feel that it’s not a very productive use of their time to participate on committees, and they largely become ineffective. Yes. So there are clearly issues of efficiency on dh or inefficiency, let’s. Get some some terms down. We could have standing committees. We could have ad hoc committees. We can have a task force. Can you help explain these? Sure. Well, typically, you know, standing committee, the committee that has a perpetual existence until you know the board or some body decides that that committee doesn’t need to exist anymore but talking generally perpetually existence and ad hoc committee is usually organized to address a specific task on dh at hot committees are often referred to his task. Of course, taskforce is, although i don’t really see the difference between the two. They have defined life spans, and usually, when the assigned task is completed or can’t be furthered anymore that’s when when that committee saw what would be an example of something that an ad hoc committee would would be working on, they might work on the capital campaign or ah, particular event, for example. Okay, i saw some examples of leadership transition to if they’re if we’re in search of a new ceo. Yeah, absolutely. That’s. Another great example. Okay, it was just a good but now it’s just it’s. Just a good one on important. Well, thank you. Okay. Let’s, see, eso now weaken also have board committees and advisory committees. And you mentioned having people outside the board on committees. So can you help us understand this? This distinction? Sure. You know, i think it’s a really common misconception that you can have somebody that’s not on the board served on a board committee. First distinction is that a board committee is made up of on ly board members and nobody else you can have other committees that are not bored committees. And they could be delegated with authority to andi, those other committees non board committees order for them to right now, khun b, composed of both directors and bond directors or simply just non directors. People from the outside and why i actually prefer the term non board committee latto advisory committee is that these committees could be delegated with management authority and they can have significant authority. But the difference between the board committee and these non board committees is that only a board committee can be delegated toe act with all of the power of the board and there’s certain limitations to that authority as well. But boredom it ease can act in place. Of the board, in many, many circumstances where as a non board committee could not actually do that for pete’s sake. Okay, so non board committees, though, can be can be authorized by the board. Teo, do some narrow function or something, right, but not but not be delegated all the responsibilities of the board is that is that is that correct? Yeah, so they can actually have substantial authority, but they can’t act in place of the board. So where aboard action is necessary. Often times it will say a board or a board committee can take this action, but a non board committee would not be able to do that. What a non board committee might be able to do, though, is tio make decisions on fund-raising or on policy advocacy or program decisions, they might be able to approve a lease or something else. The board may wantto ratify those actions later and board oversight over committee actions is really an important part of governance, too, okay, and all the authority given a committee, whether it’s, a board committee or non board and i guess even whether it’s standing or ad hoc all is given from the full board. Is that right? Yeah. Generally that’s, right? So so the board of directors is going to delegate certain authority to to these committees, and they’re going to want to get some sort of report back from what these committees, if they’ve been given any sort of authority to take action so that the board khun khun, monitor and provide oversight over those committee actions. Now, i think the standing committees aren’t those aren’t those fairly common. Yeah, i think it’s it’s very common for organizations dafs standing committees, although, you know, i might venture a pretty aggressive guess and say that a lot of standing committee’s it’s not the majority of standing committees are pretty useless. Uh, okay, be careful for a lot of smaller organizations. A lot of standing committees are again not very useful in acting in place of the board, and they might be good for giving advice. But then there there might not be a need for perpetual existence on dh they’re off. They’re obviously going to be many, many exceptions to that, i would say generally, boards have to be very careful about having standing committees that are not active and that air not tasked with specific duties that feels very, very empowered to carry out the duties and provide recommendations to the board or take actions in place of the board if they’re bored. Committees or take management actions have there been delegated without authority? Yeah, otherwise, if these committees become ineffective and boardmember start to feel their time is being wasted, you’ve got a big donor relations problem among your most committed or formerly most committed volunteers. Yeah, absolutely. That’s. I mean, if you’re a boardmember tony, would you like to sit around at a committee meeting for two hours and then report back to the board and the board just listens to the report and then just move on carrying on businesses normal without taking any action on those? You know that reporter recommendations let’s, let’s, talk about the executive committee on di. We pulled listeners and you helped pole gene before the show. Thank you very much. One of the questions was, do you have an executive committee of your board? And ninety percent looks like maybe a little more than ninety percent said yes, and and the remainder said no? Nobody said not sure. So thes executive committees at least for listeners of non-profit radio are very common, but there’s pros and cons yeah, absolutely on dh. So, yes, i think executive committees, they’re probably the most common form of committee on dh they may make a lot of sense for a larger organizations, especially if they’ve got boards that have difficulty meeting on a relatively frequent basis and executive committee is a good way to continue to provide oversight over the organization in between boardmember ings and executive committee may be ableto act in place of the board. Teo, you know, pass like bank resolutions to open up a bank account and do some of the sort of ministerial duties that that boards need to do some time. So for those reasons, executive committee’s could be very valuable the danger or the primary danger. I think with executive committee, that if you over delegate authority to the executive committee, you could disempower the board so the executive committee could be the core leadership group that sort of takes hold of the organization and just creates a power discrepancy between the executive committee, board members and all the other board members so that the executive committee pushes through. Its agenda and takes all the action’s necessary to push through its agenda, leaving the rest of the board disempowered and feeling inactive and not very helpful to the organization at all. And just as he said before with back-up disengaging your your your biggest donors, which typically include includes many of your board members, you could do the same thing by giving too much power to an executive committee than this enchanting those boardmember donors who are not part of that committee, where do you draw the line? Well, not where? How do you draw the line about? If we are going to have an executive committee, how much authority that committee should have versus the full board or other committees who decides this well, it should be the board and that’s where way commonly don’t see anything defined in terms of limiting the executive committee’s authority and that’s, one of the sources of problems often by-laws say that the executive committee just can act in place of the board. Um, in between board meetings and that’s, the limit of the authority that’s been given to the executive committee, so they’ve got almost blanket authority to do almost anything. In between board meetings and that’s, not a good governance structure so e-giving specific tasks or limiting executive committee, too, performing only certain tasks, and maybe acting maura’s a reporting body to the rest of the board. Maybe the way too structured for most organizations, there are some organizations where the executive committee needs to be given a little bit more authority, but the board has gotta be ableto exercise oversight over those executive committee actions as well. So getting reports back at the next board meeting ratifying perhaps the most important executive committee actions taken after vetting the supporting information is really part of a board studio. All right, we’re going toe go out for a break. I want to send some live listener love, too. San francisco, california, rockland, california state college, pennsylvania and at least one person is masked in the u s so if i haven’t sent live listener love to you, you’re you’re masking yourself, and we know that you are the national security agency in in in suburban washington, in virginia, stay with us, jean, and i’m going to keep having our committee confab. Like what you’re hearing a non-profit radio tony’s got more on youtube, you’ll find clips from stand up comedy tv spots and exclusive interviews catch guests like seth gordon. Craig newmark, the founder of craigslist marquis of eco enterprises, charles best from donors choose dot org’s aria finger, do something that worked neo-sage levine from new york universities heimans center on philantech tony tweets to he finds the best content from the most knowledgeable, interesting people in and around non-profits to share on his stream. If you have valuable info, he wants to re tweet you during the show. You can join the conversation on twitter using hashtag non-profit radio twitter is an easy way to reach tony he’s at tony martignetti narasimhan t i g e n e t t i remember there’s a g before the end he hosts a podcast for the chronicle of philanthropy fund-raising fundamentals is a short monthly show devoted to getting over your fund-raising hartals just like non-profit radio, toni talks to leading thinkers, experts and cool people with great ideas. As one fan said, tony picks their brains and i don’t have to leave my office fund-raising fundamentals was recently dubbed the most helpful non-profit podcast you have ever heard. You can also join the conversation on facebook, where you can ask questions before or after the show. The guests were there, too. Get insider show alerts by email, tony tells you who’s on each week and always includes link so that you can contact guests directly. To sign up, visit the facebook page for tony martignetti dot com. Podcast pleasantries out to everybody lift, listening on the time shift and especially listening. Not now, but he will be on twitter at counting charity. Brian, thank you very much. I’m glad your morning commute is so much better now because you listen to non-profit radio while you’re driving carefully, i hope you’re listening. You driving carefully? Are you? Are you at the speed limit or below? This is critical, brian. Thank you very much. We have listeners in iran. We have lots of listeners in china shen jin, non jing and others in china wishing you happy. New year cerini inquire chaillou. Okay, jean takagi. Um let’s say there’s a woman who wants tio these heir, not her words. These air. These are my words. There’s, a consultant who wants to basically kill executive committee’s. Eliminate them in all cases. Simone joyo. Do you are you familiar with her work? Or have you seen her around? You know, i think she writes for the non-profit quarterly. I believe that’s where i saw it on, by the way. She’s a safari also not a u f o r e. She has not attained the ultra designation yet. I have not. Bestowed it upon her, but i don’t know her that drug in jail for you, tony. I know you, weren’t you, jeanne. Now you were not listening in the first half of the show, jean you, if you were, i snagged you. If you were listening the first half of the show, you would know that the ufc ari, is something that i hold, which is an ultra advanced certified fund-raising executive. I hold it. And now, in the first half of the show, i bestowed it upon guest linda lacey kowski, but i have not bestowed it upon anyone else but that’s. Okay, gene, i’m sure you were prepping for the show. I know you were. I know you were busy thinking about our our committee conned fab conversation. So there are people who, well, simone, anyway, she feels very strongly about there should not be executive committee’s at all. I think it’s ah, great discussion, tohave for some boards. But, yeah, i think that’s, really just being provocative and stimulating, whether executive committee’s should really be granted with broad authority. I think, for the most part, especially with larger boards and boards that may be spread throughout the state or throughout the country. Executive committee’s still can be very useful, okay? But it’s a worthwhile discussion to have and your point earlier was that it’s the full board that should be deciding this, not just the chair and the and the ceo, right? And it should be in a good note that only the board can create a board committee and executive committee should be aboard committee. So executive committee should be a committee that’s composed of only board members. And if that that’s the case again, the board is the only body that can create an executive committee. The chair, the executive director they can’t commit. Create the committee themselves. Okay, how about staff support for board committees? What should that look like? Well, first reference, there’s. A great article in blue avocado that came out recently on staffing committees. And i recommend that all your listeners staff support of committees is just so crucial. It’s really important to make sure that the committees are well equipped with the information they need to carry on their duties and connected to what the organization is actually doing on the ground, and not just in theory and in documents so providing that support understanding for it, for the staff that better involved. In providing support to the committee’s understanding why the committee members are there and are looking to help the organization and understanding how to best communicate information to them and facilitate the way for the community committees toe act including, you know, figuring out how to get the information to them in the right form, within the right amount of time in advance of a meeting or an action that needs to be taken, providing them with the right facilities and, you know, even providing the right food and drinks that that’s the incentive to bring the committee together, all of those things could be tremendously helpful. We talked earlier about the advisory committees on another poll question for listeners was, do you have advisory committee or committees? And about sixty three percent said they do and the remainder well, about thirty, thirty percent said no, and then the rest weren’t weren’t quite sure so, like two thirds do have advisory committees let’s explore this little deeper than they could be valuable, you suggested it, but let’s go deeper in bringing outside expertise into the into the into the organization and supporting the board. Yeah, and i can’t emphasize enough. That i think an advisory committee and non board i’m sorry, non board. I meant non board. I know you. You prefer non board, i said, screwed that up non-profit ese well, and advisory committee can be okay for the bomb for committees that are delegated with management power. So if they’re going to strictly have advisory privileges, i like advisory committee. I don’t particularly like advisory board because board suggests that their board members with fiduciary duties, if you have fiduciary duties, you have potential exposure to personal liabilities for failing to live up to those duties. And we’ve talked about that. Yeah. So the great thing about being an advisory committee members if it’s truly advisory, you don’t have any fiduciary duty, and that makes it much easier to recruit individuals who might not have the time or it might not have the desire. Teo sort of meet all of the fiduciary duties of being a boardmember, but really, like the organization. Which case, you know, you can recruit them on an advisory committee. That committee might just meet once every six months. Or it might meet even less than that. Or it might just be a body. Of people who executive director can phone, you know, phone every once in a while just to bounce ideas off of on get they’re a pain in perspective, so in that way you could just really widen your resource pool, forgetting expertise and experience and perspective that might be missing from the board. And i just think it’s such a valuable tool that many organizations are able teo utilize, but a lot of organizations are really not taking advantage of the ability to do that. I think that’s a shame if they’re not it’s, not utilizing that that very valuable cool. It sounds very valuable for the, uh well, here we go. Very valuable. Yes, it sounds really useful for the for the ceo tohave that that list of advisors that he or she can call and pick their brains and, you know, sort of be even in, like, an off the record discussion because we’re not in a board meeting and we’re not talking to someone who has the fiduciary duties. Yeah, i think it’s so valuable to be ableto have that for for the executive director and the executive director might have know their own sort of clos. Closely held advisory body and the board might actually have its own advisory body as well on dh it’s, nice for the board to be able to participate and network amongst themselves. And, you know, boards have fund-raising responsibilities, as you often discuss with some of your gas. But acting is ambassadors to the organization and bringing in not just financial support but expertise to the organization and introducing them to people who might be interested. It can also result in future donors as well. And so i think advisory committees are just fabulous ways too. Teo grow the resources of an organisation. Just about a minute or so left jean i think i saw on your blogged link to a site called board cafe. Yeah. Are you familiar with that? Is that that? I presume? I’m pretty sure it was your board. Your your block. Right. So is that a resource that you’d recommend? Yeah, i think. Bored cafe was adventure. Initially launched by compass point non-profits services, based in san francisco. It’s, a management support organization that’s recognized widely is is one of the best in the country on dh. It may have been taken over by the the online magazine blue avocado i mentioned earlier i’m not sure that board cap they still exist. The blue avocado doesn’t that some edited by jan mathos oak of the california association of non-profits and is a fantastic online journal highly recommended for a number of non-profit issues, including h r and committees and what’s the name of that site again that she had it at blue avocados. It’ll be on, i think, blue avocado dot org’s okay, we have to leave it there, gene, thank you very much. Great, thanks always a pleasure. Jean takagi, managing attorney at neo non-profit and exempt organizations law group in san francisco, you’ll find him at non-profit law blawg dot com, and on twitter at g tak i’m back next week. Friday the thirteenth matt scharpnick explains elegant and strategic design what is it? How do you achieve it? And why is charity water so talked about also amy sample ward returns she’s, our social media contributor, ceo of n ten non-profit technology network and based in portland, oregon. If you missed any part of today’s show, find it on tony martignetti dot com remember there’s a g? Never mind we’ve heard enough. Of that. K m, u z eighty eight point five and one hundred point seven fm in oregon, salem, kaiser and the mid willamette valley. Welcome again, thanks so much for being with us. I do stand up comedy. I did a set last month, and the video is up at tony martignetti dot com. Check it out. Our creative producers, claire meyerhoff. Sam liebowitz is our line producer. The show’s social media is by susan chavez. Susan chavez. Dot com on the remote producer of tony martignetti non-profit radio is john federico. Of the new rules on music is by scott stein, with me next week for non-profit radio. Big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent. Go out and be going duitz what’s not to love about non-profit radio tony gets the best guests check this out from seth godin this’s the first revolution since tv nineteen fifty and henry ford nineteen twenty it’s the revolution of our lifetime here’s a smart, simple idea from craigslist founder craig newmark yeah insights, orn presentation or anything people don’t really need the fancy stuff they need something which is simple and fast. When’s the best time to post on facebook facebook’s andrew noise nose at traffic is at an all time hyre on nine am or eight pm so that’s when you should be posting your most meaningful post here’s aria finger ceo of do something dot or ge young people are not going to be involved in social change if it’s boring and they don’t see the impact of what they’re doing so you gotta make it fun and applicable to these young people look so otherwise a fifteen and sixteen year old they have better things to dio they have xbox, they have tv, they have their cell phones me dar is the founder of idealised took two or three years for foundation staff to sort of dane toe add an email address card. It was like it was phone. This email thing is right and that’s, why should i give it away? Charles best founded donors choose dot or ge somehow they’ve gotten in touch kind of off line as it were on dh and no two exchanges of brownies and visits and physical gifts. Mark echo is the founder and ceo of eco enterprises. You may be wearing his hoodies and shirts. Tony talked to him. Yeah, you know, i just i’m a big believer that’s not what you make in life. It sze, you know, tell you make people feel this is public radio host majora carter. Innovation is in the power of understanding that you don’t just do it. You put money on a situation expected to hell. You put money in a situation and invested and expect it to grow and savvy advice for success from eric sacristan. What separates those who achieve from those who do not is in direct proportion to one’s ability to ask others for help. The smartest experts and leading thinkers air on tony martignetti non-profit radio big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five.

Nonprofit Radio for January 30, 2015: 2014 Fundraising Report & 2015 Forecast

Big Nonprofit Ideas for the Other 95%

I Love Our Sponsor!

Sponsored by Generosity Series, a nationwide series of multi-charity 5K events that provide a proven peer-to-peer fundraising platform to charities and an amazing experience for their participants.

Sign-up for show alerts!

Listen Live or Archive:

My Guests:

Rob Mitchell, Doug White & Paul Schervish2014 Fundraising Report & 2015 Forecast

The Atlas of Giving released its fundraising review for last year and initial forecast for this year. How’d we do in 2014? Plus, you need to hear the 2015 prognosis. Atlas CEO Rob Mitchell reveals the numbers. Professors Doug White and Paul Schervish opine.

 


Top Trends. Sound Advice. Lively Conversation.

You’re on the air and on target as I delve into the big issues facing your nonprofit—and your career.

If you have big dreams but an average budget, tune in to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.

I interview the best in the business on every topic from board relations, fundraising, social media and compliance, to technology, accounting, volunteer management, finance, marketing and beyond. Always with you in mind.

Sign-up for show alerts!

Sponsored by: GenEvents logo
View Full Transcript

Transcript for 225_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150130.mp3

Processed on: 2018-11-11T23:14:57.153Z
S3 bucket containing transcription results: transcript.results
Link to bucket: s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/transcript.results
Path to JSON: 2015…01…225_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150130.mp3.173011553.json
Path to text: transcripts/2015/01/225_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150130.txt

Hello and welcome to tony martignetti non-profit radio. Big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent. I’m your aptly named host. We’ve got a new affiliate, very excited. Km you z one hundred point seven fm in salem and keizer, oregon non-profit radio for the capital, and kaiser and other parts of the mid willamette valley. Welcome km, jozy very, very glad to have you with us. I got a listener of the week, bobby de l’art, the auctioneer in tempe, arizona. You’ve got to hear this, wait. That’s all this is for the weak bobby ellard auctioneer he heard the show on auctions and did a valuable video with more ideas. He blogged the show and he sent me a really thoughtful personal video, which was not that personal is g g rated personal video, and he loves non-profit radio he’s at bobby d auctions and bobby de auctions dot com i’ll send you a video of the non-profit radio library you pick a book and i’ll send it to you. Congratulations, bobby de l’art, our listener of the week i’m glad you’re with me i’d come down with a bad case of order, correa if i rubbed up against the idea that you missed today’s show twenty fourteen fund-raising review and twenty fifteen forecast. Yeah, lots of giving released its fund-raising review for last year and initial forecast for this year. How’d we do in twenty fourteen plus, you need to hear the twenty fifteen prognosis atlas ceo rob mitchell reveals the numbers professor’s doug white and paul schervish opine on tony’s take two your best bequest prospects responsive today by fund-raising from the heart a workshop with lin twist right before valentine’s day in new york city i’m very pleased that the twenty fourteen review and twenty fifteen forecast bye atlas of giving bring rob mitchell back to the show. He’s, the ceo of the atlas he’s at philanthropy man or philantech roman, if you prefer. I liked it that way. On twitter and also at atlas of giving, you’ll find them at atlas of giving dot com rob mitchell, ceo welcome back to the show, tony it’s, great to be with you. Pleasure what let’s let’s acquaint listeners before we get to the headline let’s acquaint listeners with what this atlas is all about. Sure, the alice of giving at the alice of giving we measure the velocity and trajectory of charitable giving in the united states. We do it monthly we so each month we produce a free monthly report that shows e-giving by nine sectors health, education, religion, the arts, environment, etcetera, four sources, individuals, foundations, corporations and bequest, and then by all fifty states in the district of columbia. And what are these numbers based on what we what we did, tony, was we originally back in two thousand ten, we took forty two years worth of published e-giving data and the hypothesis wass that giving in the united states it correlates it’s, a specific economic demographic and event factors. So we hired a team of twenty five phd level analysts and statisticians toe look at this, they examined more than seventy five different factors, and they were able to come back and identify indeed what factors our have strong correlation with charitable giving in the united states. And then we were able to build our first algorithm, which corresponds with the national giving total based on those factors and the strength of the correlation and each of those things. So it would include things like unemployment, interest rates, values of the stock market, etcetera and each of those each of those things that correlates to charitable giving has a relative strength. And so those strengths were built into the algorithm, and what we were able to come up with was an algorithm when matched up with those forty two years of previously published annual giving numbers matched at a rate of over ninety eight percent. So it’s it’s a fantastic thing. Since then, we’ve developed six sixty for additional algorithms, one for each of the nine sectors one free to the four sources and one for each of fifty states plus dc. And interestingly, the factors that are involved let’s say an individual giving are different than the factors that are involved in corporate giving or foundation giving. Similarly, how organizations raised money and who they raised it from makes a difference, and so sectors are different. The factors that affect those sectors are different, so the factors that affect gifts toe education are different from the from the factors that affect gifts to churches as an example. Okay, and we’re going toe. Hopefully we’ll have some time to talk about different macro economic factors with with our two professors that will join us shortly. Um okay, let’s. Um, thank you for explaining what? What the basis of the the review for twenty fourteen and the beginning, of course. Get to the twenty fifteen forecast. Thanks for explaining what, what they’re from and how they’re derived. Um, let’s, get to the headline. What is, uh what? What is the e-giving number for twenty fourteen? Twenty. Fourteen was a great year for giving tony ah us charitable giving in our estimate top four hundred and fifty billion. In fact, the total was four hundred fifty six point seven. Three billion, and that is a nine point, three percent increase over two thousand thirteen, and this this extraordinary number was fueled by a verona by several favorable economic factors that dr e-giving yeah, okay, now we’re not we will be able to go into all the factors, but i know you have no employment and the stock market had to have been influential. The stock market has been great since the recession, and unfortunately, the value of the stock market for some sectors is very good, while in other sectors not so good. So organizations like churches, like large national charities that rely on lots of small gifts from lots of donors, those organizations air greatly impacted by high unemployment and those organizations have not fared as well since since the recession, as organizations like colleges and universities where donors aaron campaign are the organization’s air in campaign mode or they’re they’re receiving gifts that air based in stock real estate and ask kinds of e-giving those organizations, because of the stock market increases over the last few years, have done quite well. Okay, let’s, let’s look att donor advised funds to had how as a source of giving, how influential were they this year or last year? Well, donorsearch vice funds since the recession have been, i would say, the biggest story and charitable giving in the united states donorsearch advised funds have done extremely well, and that is that’s in large measure due to the ramp up in stock values. In two thousand fourteen donorsearch advised funds accounted for twenty nine point four billion and giving, and if you think about the total e-giving over four hundred fifty billion donorsearch advised funds, now this is gifts going into the funds and grants coming out of the funds to other organizations, but donorsearch advised funds accounted for six point, four percent of all giving in the u s in two thousand fourteen. Okay. Oh, but that’s that you’re counting giving into funds and also out from funds. But to give the money into the funds doesn’t necessarily make it to a charity in twenty fourteen. No. But you remember a donor advised funds like a fidelity of vanguard charitable are schwab charitable those air five? Oh, one c three organizations on their own. Okay, okay, not were we not your typical? Charity okay, let’s, go out for a break a little early, and of course, when we come back, rob and i are going to keep talking about twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen forecast, and we’ll be joined by professors doug white and paul schervish. Stay with us, you’re tuned to non-profit radio. Tony martignetti also hosts a podcast for the chronicle of philanthropy fund-raising fundamentals is a quick ten minute burst of fund-raising insights published once a month. Tony’s guests are expert in crowdfunding, mobile giving event fund-raising direct mail and donor cultivation. Really, all the fund-raising issues that make you wonder, am i doing this right? Is there a better way there is? Find the fund-raising fundamentals archive it. Tony martignetti dot com that’s marketmesuite n e t t i remember there’s, a g before the end, thousands of listeners have subscribed on itunes. You can also learn maura, the chronicle website philanthropy dot com fund-raising fundamentals the better way. Welcome back to big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent. I’m going to send podcast pleasantries first for everybody listens in the time shift. Very, very grateful to have you over ten thousand of you. Thank you so much. Live listener love. Oh, my goodness, we’re exploding. This is a very, very popular, very, very popular live show. San jose, california. Shakopee, minnesota. Korbel, indiana live. Listen. Love maspeth, new york land o’lakes, florida, dallas, texas campbell, california, atlanta, georgia live listener love to each of you and there’s more. We have a lot of live. Listen, love. Okay. Um, let’s. Bring in let’s. Bring on our one of our professors. Pull schervish he’s, the professor of sociology and director of the center on wealth and philanthropy at boston college he’s been selected five times to the non-profit times, power and influence top fifty. We got lots of somebody else just a couple weeks ago, henry tim’s lots of power and influence on non-profit radio with john havens. Professor of service co authored the nineteen, ninety eight report millionaires and the millennium, which predicted the now well known forty one billion trillion trillion dollar transfer of wealth and got enormous popular press. His next book will be aristotle’s legacy, the moral biography of wealth and the new physics of philanthropy. Paul service. Welcome to non-profit radio. Pompel e-giving this great intro when he’s not there. Let’s, go to doug white. He’s, also a professor. I am here. I am here. Okay. That’s. Okay. You muted your phone. What kind of inauspicious entrances? That’s a non-profit radio let’s. Do it again. Yeah, i hardly ever muted and it’s hard to mute me. You’re a professor it’s, not it’s. Understood. Welcome to non-profit radio. Thank you very much. Pleasure to have you do it. You, tony. Thank you. Hello, doug. And rob. Hello to you too, it’s. Good to talk about football now we all know each other. Hello, paul. What stood out for you in the twenty fourteen fund-raising numbers from atlas of giving hyre the question i have for rob because and what stuck out is nothing new. But is a question that he’s going to be asked him? It needs to explained because back-up our institute also tends to get hyre increases in giving, eh, dahna e-giving yusa does. But i wanted to ask robin what struck me. Rob was, um no. Why is that one hundred billion dollars larger? Not only a larger trend, but a hundred billion dollars larger. Uh then e-giving usa. And where is that money coming from? I know you asked me a question, and i’m not supposed to answer a question with a question, but rob, i i think that would be informative where’s that money coming from and why is that one hundred billion more, according to what we’re finding with the atlas? Sure, it’s a great question, paul, and the the answer, but in large measure is due to a couple of things. One is that to build the alice of giving to build the out now sixty five algorithms that we have, at least initially, we relied on forty two years of published data from e-giving yusa, and what we relied it relied on it for was to determine what factors actually correlate. Teo e-giving and once we determine those factors we no longer needed e-giving use a data, and so the the atlas numbers took on a life of their own, so to speak, right there, some things that that giving yusa, uh there, there, in my opinion, there’s, some there’s, some things that that need to be asked of giving yusa and our current giving environment that i don’t think that they’re keeping up. With one is donor advised funds, they make no estimate on donor advised funds, and we’re estimating that in two thousand fourteen dahna advised funds were over six percent of the giving total. The other thing is that e-giving yusa is relying on tax data that is more than two years old to make a determination about the year that they’re measuring. And as you well know, the year two thousand nine in terms of tax data very, very different from the year two thousand eleven. So, uh, tryingto trying to use tax data from two years ago to make a determination about about the year you’re measuring isa bit like reading a newspaper from this day two years ago and trying to determine what happened in the news today. Another thing that another weakness is that there is no and giving us a will say in fact they did on this show last year, they said they don’t use surveys dahna they use tax data. Unfortunately for churches, churches are not required to file any tax data, and if they’re not using surveys, we’re talking about a third of the charitable giving total, and i’m not sure where they’re extrapolating their number from but if it isn’t from a survey, it can’t be from tax data and that’s that is a huge difference. That’s uh, that’s a third of the charitable giving economy right there. All right? Uh, yeah, i think it is important to look at these trends and donor invites fundez they’re huge, and i think the listeners should know that they banned foundations that don’t give directly to charity. That was tony’s initial question when people give to a foundation that’s when the charitable gift this registered it’s a charitable gift when a foundation that gives it to a active on direct line charity, it doesn’t show up in these statistics again, same with donor advice once when you give to the donor advice once the atlas, other groups have nicer charitable giving count that it’s the gift they don’t double count the gift to what’s going on out in the world, but the growths and donor advice hyre and foundations our huge over the last ten years, and they project to be continued to be huge, as people, um, give while living can ah lot of foundation formation or a lot of the money that went into force that goes into from patients is actually showing up there earlier. Our research shows instead of waiting for the final estate when of bequests to charitable bequests creates or leads to the largest amount of money for a foundation. No, the debate that’s going on in your listeners are probably well aware of this is are these donorsearch vice funds and foundations housing too much money that he oughta be passing forward more quickly and in larger amounts to today’s needs. And that’s also been debated in congress. Yeah, you have. Yeah. I want to bring in. I want to bring in that one of the points that i think is very important as we see foundation e-giving e-giving two foundations e-giving two donor advised funds increasing as part of this package of growth in philanthropy. Go ahead. Yeah, i want to thank you. I know this guy’s a professor. Go ahead, but the anarchist anarchist is what he is. You have anarchist after your name? No. Just only know only phd. All right, i want to bring doug white. Is that okay? If we bring doug white and paul right now? I’m kidding with you all. Right. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Know, yeah. You should know. I’m joking with you while you have been on before, so maybe you don’t know. That’s. Good. Okay. Doug white, director of the master of science in fund-raising management program at columbia university. He’s been responsible for efforts that have raised more than eight hundred million dollars and he’s written four books. His latest is abusing donorsearch tent. The robertson family’s epic lawsuit against princeton university. We talked about that on non-profit radio last may. Dog. Right. Welcome back to the show in the studio. Thank you for having me, it’s. Good to be here. And it’s. Good to see you again. And it’s. Really good to be on with these two guests that you have. Not really a lot of fun. I agree. Cold. I’m glad you shared that. What? What is significant for you in the twenty fourteen fund-raising review? Well, i was glad to hear the explanation of what the difference is between giving yusa and the atlas. I still would like to know more about how that comes about because it is such a huge amount that and i know that everyone down dallas is going. To have to talk about this a lot, but it is such a huge amount that it almost challenges indiana university to its own methodology, and i think you were saying that earlier, rob and so i’m wondering if at some point there’s going to be some sort of ah, revelation is tow the specifics about how this is really done. For the record, i’ve always been wondering about tthe e-giving yusa numbers anyway, i think that did the d a f the dafs money going in, and also the church estimates are really suspect, and so i’m glad to see other factors being brought into that algorithm, and if it really does mean that we’re raising more than about one hundred billion dollars more per year than we’re being told otherwise. That’s good what i also note is and i think you also mentioned this earlier up, is that education e-giving is increasing, and that would be one of the areas where the stock market is helping. There was a report out this past week about the top ten universities in the united states and how they have increased their giving by about twenty percent has a portion of all of the university e-giving so what that tells me is that more and more wealthy donors are giving to to the larger universities, the wealthy universities, the wealthy organizations and my question or my concern it’s not a question for now, although i’d love to hear anybody’s response to this, but my concern is that a cz we as i look at our program and we’re educating people to go out into the non-profit world to become leaders and fund-raising and leaders and non-profits i’m wondering if we’re seeing a forgive the phrase a de democratization of fund-raising in other words, we usedto work on ah, system, where eighty percent of the people gave twenty percent of the money and vice versa, and so we would spend more and more of our time on that twenty percent of the larger donors i’m afraid that number is closer to ninety or even hyre and ten percent, in other words, what i’m worried about is that as we look for these larger and larger and larger gifts from seoul individuals, are we starting to lose the idea that philanthropy is for everyone and the e-giving report in the atlas strikes me. As being a continuation of that issue, i don’t know that that’s a bad thing in terms of the money going to the charity, i think that’s that’s a separate question what i do wonder about is how charities are reaching a sze yu would say on your show here, tony, the other ninety five percent and how do we make them feel included? And our philanthropic objectives so you’re concerned about either call it a deed, democratization or concentration on the on the flip side of e-giving yeah, i would actually prefer de democratization because i think it is a negative trend, okay, i’ll take i’ll take a bit of a stab at that, doug, i think they’re and this also gets to the question of why the big difference in giving us an estimate and ours, and that is one of the things that’s happened over the past twelve years, that’s the number of non-profits in the u s has grown fifty percent and that that is a huge number because those non-profits regardless of whether they’re you know what their expenses are, they’re raising money and that that is a that’s, a gigantic number of new non-profits entering that, the fund-raising marketplace and then technology has been super fantastic. The effectiveness and efficiency of fund-raising techniques is increasing every day, and to your point about the democratization of charitable giving. There are some great signs of things like bonem well, crowdfunding is one example prize for philanthropy is another example where, where grassroots donors are getting involved online to make significant contributions, and i don’t mean by that major gifts, but make contributions to charitable organizations at the grassroots level. Well, that’s a good point, and i just wanted to ask you, when you say the fifty percent number and no it’s for five months say three’s, did you mean all five a onesie? Threes you’re talking about public charities within that i am talking about five o one c three specifically, ok, so that would include the foundations as well as because there’s been a growth and family foundations to over the years that makes sense. And and i i’m sorry. Good look like talking about okay top heaviness pompel a terrible giving, depending on whether you do it according to federal reserve numbers, by income or by wealth is very topic just to give you an idea back-up about four hundred eighty six thousand household of a million that they have a million dollars in income each year. Bonem they make eleven percent. Hyre excuse me, twenty one percent of all the charitable giving. And when you get to five hundred thousand or more and income for a household, not for individuals, you get thirty percent of the charitable giving. So it’s, very top eddie. But let’s say ninety five percent of the giving is done by households under two thousand two hundred thousand dollars just because of that numbers to those people. So while there is this question of democratization of charitable giving, ninety five percent of terrible giving is still done by households under two hundred thousand and income. Now, if you want to go to back-up one hundred twenty five alison, then it’s, about ninety percent is given by people under one hundred twenty five thousand. So a lot of still going on it’s going on in the church’s, everybody would say that’s, where a large proportion of the church money comes from. But it’s important to understand that there is a vibrant, charitable life that is lower than that, and it is a risk. I think we have to be very careful that we allow people, and this is one of my cases were donorsearch advice, so that the upper affluent can’t put money aside over a period of time to make larger contributions and concentrate on impact for an organisation for which that will make a larger difference than simply a five hundred dollar gift for one hundred dollars. Give teacher paul, we have to. We have to take a break. We’re going to come back. We’ll continue the conversation. Of course, we’ll get to the twenty fifteen forecast. Also. Well, it, uh, doug white, think about what paul just said, and we’ll return to the doug white and paul schervish non-profit radio very shortly. Stay with us. Uh, thank you. We don’t go away for break. I keep talking. Um, fund-raising fund-raising from the heart. It is a workshop in new york city, coming up on february twelfth and thirteenth, right before valentine’s day, lin twist. She used to head fund-raising at the hunger project for twenty years. Her book is the soul of money, and now she coaches and trains fundraisers around the world and she’s doing the teaching at fund-raising from the heart. There’s quite a bit. To learn from her. You can get more information and register at t h p dot or ge slash f, f, th that’s, foxtrot, foxtrot, tango, hotel, lin twist and fund-raising from the heart. Tony steak to my video this week is your best bequest prospects. There are two very simple criteria for identifying the best potential donors for gift by will and ah, i walk you through them by candlelight it’s a candlelight video, not a candlelight vigil, candlelight video and you’ll find that at tony martignetti dot com and that is tony’s take two for friday, thirtieth of january fourth show of twenty fifteen doug, wait, you, uh you wanna respond? Teo paul’s ah, response about your your concern about de democratization? Well, i’m thinking of a more from the perspective of the alumni or the development office, and i think that paul’s, right? In fact, i am sure that the numbers bear out because i’ve seen those as well, that there is a very vibrant e-giving culture going on in the lower economic levels. In fact, the poorest people in the united states tend to give more of their income than the richest people do. S o in terms of people being associated or attracted to charity that’s not my concern so much, i think we’ll always have people who will be i’m thinking of it more from the other direction. From the development office and why we need to continue to pay attention to those smaller donors and not pay all of our attention, although certainly a lot of it is deserved for the larger donors. So, paul, i take your point, and i appreciate your putting it into perspective, i really do. And so i just clarify what i was thinking about from from the fund-raising perspective, not so much the fund, the donor result where the fund-raising result perspective, i’d like to take off my atlas hat and put on my practitioner hat as a fund-raising practitioner for more than thirty years, and doug’s point is a great one it’s about type line it’s the small gifts and small givers are very, very important to the pipeline because the twenty six year old individual who’s giving you, uh, ten or twenty five or fifty dollars, a year now could very easily be the next richard branson in a few years. And you’ve got to keep the pipeline stuffed so that the major gift opportunities and planned giving opportunities come up later. Now, of course, not everybody becomes richard branson, but assed people as people grow and mature and their economic conditions change it’s it is imperative for organizations to keep acquiring new donors at all age levels and and at all income levels as they go forward, because those are your prospects for the future. And, as i say, mostly major gifts and planned gifts or campaign gifts in the future, rob i’d like to i’d like to focus a lot more on the on the review before we get to the twenty fifteen forecast. Can you just run us through a couple of the sectors? How religion, education, environment does have some of those sectors fared in twenty fourteen? Sure, the sectors that did the best tony are those sectors that rely on people who are giving out out of assets rather than out of income or both. And so the the sectors that did particularly well in two thousand fourteen worthy human needs disaster services sector was up twelve point seven percent the environmental sector, which is still a very small sector of the e-giving pie, but that was up eleven point eight percent, and gifts to education were up eleven point five percent. On the downside, though nothing no sector lost ground in two thousand. Fourteen religion or gifts to churches is on ly growing at half the rate of gifts to things like education and the environment, and that the principal reason for that as fewer and fewer americans heir identifying themselves as church members and participating regularly in church activities didn’t know them it’s more of a demographic issue than it is a financial issue. So so religion didn’t lose any market share from twenty thirteen to twenty fourteen, we have religion losing one percent of market share twenty thirteen, twenty four and as i recall that there was also twenty twelve to twenty thirteen yes reported the same thing this time last year, okay, yeah, and, you know, the double whammy for church e-giving also was that when you wrote that in the environment that we’ve been in for the last few years with high unemployment, churches rely on lots of those small gifts from individuals, and when individuals fear becoming unemployed, they are unemployed are only recently employed reemployed they don’t give and that that is a that is a that’s been troubling part of church, giving a troubling part of church e-giving reality for the last couple of years, doug white that does that sound accurate to you? It sounds totally accurate. In fact, the trend is even more dramatic when you look at it. Over the last thirty years, there was a time when church giving constituted about fifty percent of that more than fifty. When was that back in the nineteen eighties, see that’s what is a result of the growing level of wealth and the e-giving areas that wealth holders tend to give to they don’t give the same proportion to their churches because they’re in churches with people like themselves. Once their churches built, they’re not making large contributions to their congregation. And so what duck pointed out earlier about education being more affected by the stock market and growth in the stock market is also a proxy war wealth holders making those large gifts to education bonem and i think that i would agree with that, but rob would agree with it. And, doug, i have to go back on one thing because we won our first research award on showing that the lower income groups do not give a greater proportion of their income than hyre income groups, that is a myth that was recently spread again by the false study in the chronicle of philanthropy. How america gives yes, yes, and when the federal reserve started asking about wealth and income, you’re able to show that at the low end what’s going on is that people are who are giving larger amounts to charity. Our retirees go to church and are giving from their wealth, and so when you look at percentage of income, you could have very low income people making continued substantial gifts, especially to religion. And so behind those numbers is the problem of how you have a very well income denominator and a large charitable gift, and you really don’t have a growth. Well, people slash little income people at that end, boosting that percentage so that’s important to realize that once you conceive of people’s, wealth and income and age at that lower end, the lower and does not give a greater percentage of income except for retirees, they’re well. So the study in the chronicle was faulty in the sense that it didn’t incorporate the study was a a master shame, and we got to do a program on it. They missed twenty percent of all the e-giving by the upper end by the methods that they used that we warned him against you, there was another story. Yeah, and that is another story, it’s a great one, but just one last comment on that there was a great book about twenty five or thirty years ago called wealthy and wise and for the first time, and i forget the author right now, but he did a fabulous job, yes, thank you, claude rosenberg and he did a fabulous job of explaining what you just said in a moment a moment ago and it’s something we need to take into account when we look at e-giving more than we do, we’re going to move to the twenty fifteen forecast from the atlas. Rob, why don’t you acquaint us with what you what you’re seeing for the future? Well, the first i’ll give a caveat and that is that what i’m about, what i’m about to give you as the initial twelve month forecast for twenty fifteen, i will change it always does that’s why we update each month, but our initial forecast for twenty fifteen is particularly bleak. The forecast suggests that giving could drop more than three percent in two thousand fifteen to four hundred forty two billion dollars. You know the projected decrease is largely function of unexpected correction in the stock market and we’ve seen some way have we have not yet we’re not in a bear market we haven’t experienced to correction, but we are seeing some weaknesses in the current bull market on expected increase in interest rates in the second half of twenty fifteen when interest rates go up, it puts pressure on discretionary income on the part of all donors, be the individuals, corporations, foundations, et cetera. Um, the eurozone trouble in weakening economies in germany, france and italy, particularly forty percent of all publicly traded stock company sales are to the eurozone in a weak eurozone economy is going to negatively affect the ability of u s corporations to make charitable gifts at the level they’ve been making them and then the unemployment has improved and is improving. There’s a problem of compensation compensation levels today for people who are in employed have not yet returned to pre recession levels and there are a huge number of americans who are still under employed. That’s that’s a problem as is rising competition, particularly from asia, for us companies, so i i would i would hope though this forecast this initial forecast is bleak our for our initial forecast for twenty fortin was not not so strong as what we ended up experiencing and that’s good news so we can hope for that again this year and perhaps the stock market won’t correct that’ll make a huge difference and some of these other things can be resolved and we’ll have another great e-giving year in twenty fifteen but right now it is it doesn’t look good for twenty fifteen help me explain something, rob, how is it that unemployment helped the twenty fourteen numbers because it had risen, but in twenty fifteen that increased employment is going to hurt the terms of what you think so far? I understand compensation is low, but compensation was low in twenty fourteen also, and we had under employment in twenty fourteen. So how does it cut upward in twenty fourteen and downward in twenty fifteen? The gains that were made in in employment in twenty fourteen were dramatic, and they won’t be so dramatic in twenty fifteen, and so the under compensation problem will be more will be more pronounced in twenty fifteen than it was in twenty fourteen. Let me just say about unemployment again, when people fear becoming unemployed or they’re unemployed, or they’re just recently re employed, they don’t give, typically and, uh, but when someone become what we have, what we’ve been able to observe is that when someone becomes reemployed after a period of unemployment, it takes a cz many as two years before they resume their previous levels of giving before they became unemployed. All right, we’re going to ponder that for a couple minutes. We have to do have to go away. This time. We do stop talking this time, and we’ll come back and continue the conversation. Stay with us. Like what you’re hearing a non-profit radio tony’s got more on youtube, you’ll find clips from stand up comedy tv spots and exclusive interviews catch guests like seth gordon. Craig newmark, the founder of craigslist marquis of eco enterprises, charles best from donors choose dot org’s aria finger do something that worked neo-sage levine from new york universities heimans center on philanthropy tony tweets to he finds the best content from the most knowledgeable, interesting people in and around non-profits to share on his stream. If you have valuable info, he wants to re tweet you during the show. You can join the conversation on twitter using hashtag non-profit radio twitter is an easy way to reach tony he’s at tony martignetti narasimhan t i g e n e t t i remember there’s a g before the end he hosts a podcast for the chronicle of philanthropy fund-raising fundamentals is a short monthly show devoted to getting over your fund-raising hartals just like non-profit radio, toni talks to leading thinkers, experts and cool people with great ideas. As one fan said, tony picks their brains and i don’t have to leave my office fund-raising fundamentals was recently dubbed the most helpful non-profit podcast you have ever heard. You can also join the conversation on facebook, where you can ask questions before or after the show. The guests are there, too. Get insider show alerts by email, tony tells you who’s on each week and always includes link so that you can contact guess directly. To sign up, visit the facebook page for tony martignetti dot com. Hi, this is claire meyerhoff from the plan giving agency. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at tony martignetti non-profit radio. In south korea, we have sole and an young listening on your haserot in the netherlands, we have new coupe, we have our bill, iraq and suruga. Shima, japan, konnichiwa, live listener love going to all those countries abroad. I’m sorry barcelona, spain and also turkey, but we can’t see which city you’re you’re masked in turkey, but we know you’re with us live, listener, love, bring it back to the u s quarters villa, georgia, atlanta, georgia. Lancaster, ohio. Lynchburg, virginia live listener loved to you also mass with new york. New bern, north carolina. Bethlehem, pennsylvania. St louis, missouri. Tyler, texas. Los angeles, california, honolulu and washington, d c it’s remarkable that’s a lot of live listeners. We usually get roughly half that live, but that podcast audience never forget the podcast pleasantries because they are critical for us as well. Pleasantries to those listening at other times. Paul service how does that twenty fifteen forecast strike you? I wouldn’t have you said it was bleak? I think that’s too strong a word i might have said. A challenge, you see, because what rob is talking about is twelve percent ship from a nine point something up to a three point something down, and i think that, yes, a huge crisis, but the variables at each site on ly, if they all accumulate, might we have the twelve percent ships that he’s talking about? I would have probably, uh, sighted all of the influences, he indicated. I would have sighted some positive ones. As well. But i might have talked about a chance that instead of a nine percent growth, we might be between a two and a five percent growth, given the same data. You mean to five percent growth from twenty thirteen to twenty fourteen? Yes. Yeah. Okay. Now, if we have the perfect storm dahna and bleak might be the right word. But we only have some clouds on the horizon and some insecurities. And we’re far out at sea, given everything from terrorism. And we do know that economic information and data and growth in the economy is hurt by insecurity and and worry and that we do have all right, let’s, bring if you ever look up the wall of worry about all the things that could go wrong for the economy that is listed a good number from but i think there’s some positive influences, and i think we may be too strong until we know more outwards. Okay, uh, i might have said, uh, challenging all right, rob mitchell. Paul service doesn’t see nine point three percent growth from twenty thirteen to fourteen. He says more like two to five percent. No, no, no. I see. That i don’t see it reversing in twenty fifteen. Okay. Percent. Okay. Okay. What could you could you, briefly, paul, police be brief. What are a couple of positive factors that you see for twenty fifteen? Well, it’s, what you hear on the news something’s cut both ways. One is will we have? We already incorporated the higher interest rates into bilich into the stock market and its expectation, have we found that the oil price reductions bonem are going to encourage consumer spending and standard of living united states? Are we going to find that even though we hear continuously about bob dahna wages and so on, total compensation has gone up when you put into the mix tensions and health care as part of a total compensation? That doesn’t mean people have the money to expend, but it doesn’t mean that they are the enforced to spend it all out of their pockets. Coming from companies lousy thie obama around buy-in assurance program has helped some people with their discretionary income in solo those air some positive things that i think may be up doug, right? Twenty fifteen doug white well, i tend to agree with both people. I know that rob said something, and paul is being a little bit more optimistic, and i think either way, it’s, good news and rob is also very clear about saying, look, this is just a snapshot, and so next month we’ll have more experience and we’ll have debt, better data for the predictions, and so we were kind of nurture that through the year and given both, even if it were to be a perfect storm, and we had a drop over the next year. I don’t think that’d be the end of the world. I mean, we still have a very, very strong philanthropic society, so three percent or four percent drop over what would be this this year, which was a huge increase, i think would not be the end of the world that we should stay on top of it. We should follow this and we should analyze it and dissected, but i’m not worried. Rob and doug just made this point, you know, you have the atlas will have monthly. Is that right? Monthly revisions, teo forecast we update we update the forecasts. First of all, we provide a free report updated each months and it’s usually comes out around the twenty fifth of the month. It’s it is e-giving it’s it’s an estimate of giving for the current giving year the calendar year um and it’s a look forward as much as twelve months and the further we go along and and we’re like any forecast, the the nearer we are a month to month r r our accuracy rate is nearly one hundred percent. The further out you get, the less accurate it becomes. But all of that being said, i think both paul and make some great points. I especially like calls comment about oil prices and the effect on americans at the pump it’s like giving everyone in america and including corporations, by the way, a tax cut and sew it frees up more discretionary income, and we can only hope that that will continue. So i think i appreciate the the advice that bleep maybe too big a word also like doug’s doug’s analysis that, hey, when you’re coming off a four hundred and fifty billion dollars e-giving record giving year, and to have even a modest decline is not the end to the world, i think that’s really important. And the last thing i’d say on this subject is that the importance of keeping up with the the forecast monthly i take you back to two thousand, won two thousand one was shaping up to be are really was shaping up to be a good giving here. And then the events of nine eleven occurred. And we know now that e-giving for naan. Disaster charities basically dried up for six months, so it had a huge impact on giving for the calendar year of two thousand won and also in effect on giving in two thousand two. So it was so that those are reasons why events can make a huge difference. And why we why we like to say we’re trying to keep our finger on the pulse of american philanthropy. We have to leave it there. Rob mitchell, ceo of atlas of giving. You’ll find them at atlas of giving dot com doug white, director for the master of science in fund-raising management program at columbia university. And pull schervish professor of sociology and director of the center on wealth and philanthropy at bc boston college gentlemen. Thank you all very much. Thank you. Thank you. Pleasure. Thanks, tony. Thanks, paul. Thanks, doug it’s. Been a great pleasure. Yes, next week, a show from the archive and a rich archive it is today is our two hundred twenty fifth show, but doing this since july two thousand ten once a week. If you got a favorite, let me know what it is. Tony at tony martignetti dot com. If you missed any part of today’s show, find it at tony martignetti dot com. Fund-raising from the heart, february twelfth and thirteenth, taught by the very smart lin twist information in registration at thp dot or ge slash ff, th foxtrot foxtrot tango hotel km, jozy salem, keizer, oregon. Welcome again, our creative producer is claire meyerhoff. Sam liebowitz is our line producer shows social media is by susan chavez, susan chavez, dot com and the remote producer of tony martignetti non-profit radio is john federico of the new rules. This terrific music is by scott stein of brooklyn. You’re with me next week for non-profit radio. Big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent. Go out and be great. What’s not to love about non-profit radio tony gets the best guests check this out from seth godin this’s the first revolution since tv nineteen fifty and henry ford nineteen twenty it’s the revolution of our lifetime here’s a smart, simple idea from craigslist founder craig newmark yeah insights, orn presentation or anything? People don’t really need the fancy stuff they need something which is simple and fast. When’s the best time to post on facebook facebook’s andrew noise nose at traffic is at an all time hyre on nine a m or eight pm so that’s, when you should be posting your most meaningful post here’s aria finger ceo of do something dot or ge young people are not going to be involved in social change if it’s boring and they don’t see the impact of what they’re doing. So you got to make it fun and applicable to these young people look so otherwise a fifteen and sixteen year old they have better things to do if they have xbox, they have tv, they have their cell phones. Me dar is the founder of idealist. I took two or three years for foundation staff, sort of dane toe. Add an email address their card it was like it was phone. This email thing is fired-up that’s why should i give it away? Charles best founded donors choose dot or ge somehow they’ve gotten in touch kind of off line as it were on dno, two exchanges of brownies and visits and physical gifts. Mark echo is the founder and ceo of eco enterprises. You may be wearing his hoodies and shirts. Tony talked to him. Yeah, you know, i just i i’m a big believer that’s not what you make in life. It sze you know, tell you make people feel this is public radio host majora carter. Innovation is in the power of understanding that you don’t just do you put money on a situation expected to hell. You put money in a situation and invested and expected to grow and savvy advice for success from eric sacristan. What separates those who achieve from those who do not is in direct proportion to one’s ability to ask others for help. The smartest experts and leading thinkers air on tony martignetti non-profit radio big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent.

Nonprofit Radio for January 23, 2015: Five Words To Better Fundraising & Giving Circles

Big Nonprofit Ideas for the Other 95%

I Love Our Sponsor!

Sponsored by Generosity Series, a nationwide series of multi-charity 5K events that provide a proven peer-to-peer fundraising platform to charities and an amazing experience for their participants.

Sign-up for show alerts!

Listen Live or Archive:

My Guests:

Jen ShangFive Words To Better Fundraising

Jen Shang

Jen Shang is a professor at the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. She’s a philanthropic psychologist. Her research found five words that can raise your telemarketing revenue.

 

 

 

Maria SempleGiving Circles

Maria Semple

How do you find giving circles in your community and connect with them? Maria Semple is our prospect research contributor and The Prospect Finder.

 

 

 


Top Trends. Sound Advice. Lively Conversation.

You’re on the air and on target as I delve into the big issues facing your nonprofit—and your career.

If you have big dreams but an average budget, tune in to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.

I interview the best in the business on every topic from board relations, fundraising, social media and compliance, to technology, accounting, volunteer management, finance, marketing and beyond. Always with you in mind.

Sign-up for show alerts!

Sponsored by: GenEvents logo
View Full Transcript

Transcript for 224_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150123.mp3

Processed on: 2018-11-11T23:14:53.343Z
S3 bucket containing transcription results: transcript.results
Link to bucket: s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/transcript.results
Path to JSON: 2015…01…224_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150123.mp3.563951780.json
Path to text: transcripts/2015/01/224_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20150123.txt

Hello and welcome to tony martignetti non-profit radio big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent. I’m your aptly named host. Oh, i’m glad you’re with me. I’d suffer with glamour. You alone? Afraid this? If i was forced to filter the concept that you missed today’s show five words to better fund-raising gen shang is a professor at the centre on philanthropy at indiana university. She’s, a philanthropic psychologist. Her research found five words that can raise your telemarketing revenue that originally aired on may eighteenth twenty twelve and giving circles how do you find e-giving circles in your community and connect with them? Maria simple is our prospect research contributor and the prospect finder on tony’s. Take two. I’m a thought leader. We’re sponsored by generosity. Siri’s hosting multi charity five k runs and walks. Here is my interview with professor gen shang from may twenty twelve. Wish with me now is dr gen shang. Hello, jan. How are you? Good. How are you? I’m very well. Jen is an assistant professor at the centre on philanthropy at indiana university. She is a philanthropic psychologist. She’s been published in many journals, including experimental economics, economic journal journal. Of marketing, research and marketing science. Her work has also been covered in the new york times and the chronicle of philanthropy, and she is the author of the book fund-raising principles and practice, which is available at amazon dot com. And i’m very pleased that her research in her work brings to the show welcome, jim. Thank you. We’re talking about five words to better fund-raising what was the research that we’re talking about it? So when we study how prime ing people’s idea of more identity come potentially influence, how they give andi when we say more identity, really, what we mend is how carrying kind, compassionate, helpful and friendly people think they are okay, there that’s interesting their moral identity. Yeah. Okay. That’s the that’s. The research will let, uh, what was specifically how did you conduct the research? So this is when during public radio stations on air front drive. I’m sure your listeners are quite familiar with this form of fund-raising this was bloomington bloomington public radio in indiana, right? Yeah, yeah, that steering our bling on radio on their front drive in ah, november, where they’re deejays kind of inter. Interrupt the programming and say things like, you know, here is that i remember and if you could give us this amount and here’s the thing you give, some people call in, and then half of the people who call in they are asked, you know, how are you, anouar renew a member of the station, and then there are thanked for either becoming or being a member of the station and the other half of the donors when they call in there asked exactly the same question, but when there are thanked there think for being kind and carrying member of the station were becoming a helpful and friendly member of the station. Okay, so what we found is that when people are think with those moral adjectives, then they increase their giving, but this is only significant with female, but not mayo donorsearch okay, let’s, let’s, be very clear. What are the five words that you used in your research is caring, compassionate, in-kind friendly and helpful. Okay, that actually reminds me of the used to be a boy scout. I still have an eagle scout kayman eagle scout that just reminds me of if i didn’t mention i’m an eagle scout. Thiss reminds me of the scout law you didn’t know the boy scout law, probably unless you have boys trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent. So you’ve got you’ve got two or three of those in there. Yeah, that did. You did you derive your your moral adjectives from the boy scout oath? I scott law no law, not the oath. That’s, this is the law. Pardon me. This? Sure. Some off of the participants that participated in the orange inal study where these adjectives war generated they were members of the boy scout. Ok, well, there’s a it could be some overlap, but we don’t know if that’s cause and effect that’s just that could just be coincidental. There were hundreds of people who were asked to list all possible adjectives they can possibly use to describe any moral person. And then we could. And the researchers off that really orange? No study collected the most often used adjectives by most people. Okay, i see. Those are the adjective that’s. How you came up with your caring, compassionate, friendly kind and helpful. Okay, let’s. See, the the research is on ly but only impacts females. Not so. Men are not influenced by the moral adjectives, not the set that we not these five. Hopefully, they’re influenced by the scout law, if their boy scouts, because otherwise, it’s, don’t be a scout if you’re not going. Teo, reverent and helpful and courteous and kind and cheerful, cheerful so. But women are the majority of donors, isn’t that right? Yes. Two thirds ofthe most non-profit donors are female donors. Okay, so so using your research, we can impact two thirds of the giving population. Yeah. Okay, so these people were thanked using one of the moral adjectives, but they hadn’t, but they hadn’t made their gift yet. So what were they thanked for? They were thanks for calling. Uh, as soon as they were called in. As soon as they call in there. Asked whether they want to be a new member of the station or their existing member station. And there are thanked for either becoming a new member or being a member. Okay, so you thank for either being becoming or being a member or you. Thanks for being our becoming a caring, compassionate, etcetera member. O okay, yeah. So do we know whether this applies to written solicitations? Well, we’re we’re currently testing different forms of recon communication. And what we do there is, you know, you mean one of the key things if people were to apply. This technique is not the fact that, you know, they need to write down this five wars, but they need to engage people in thinking about these words, and i think one of the main reasons why our research turned out in the way that it did is because people were asked to answer a question first and that they’re thinking in response to what they think they are already. So when we apply these techniques in return context, what we had to ask people to do is not just to have kind carrying floating everywhere in the letter, but instead only on the renewal forms we want people to say i and then people find their name like gen shang, i wanted to give this much right. And then when i signed my gen shang am fining on those words you’re signing on those words what you mean, like they’re the words are below the below the line where you put your name, the words are actually in the in the box, in the background of that box where i started durney oh, so there’s sort of shaded in the background exact, like a like a watermark. That’s, right? Okay, but this is research you’re just testing this. You don’t have results from from this written written. Test yet? Well, actually, we we dio look at me. I’m way behind. Okay, but the result is that you know, people see exactly the same thing. And half of the people are asked to print their name almost worse. And the other half are asked to sign their name on those words. And we found a marginally statistically significant results. Where if people signed their name, they give more than if they printed their name on those words. Very interesting. But did you also did you also test that against there? Not being any words. Yes, it’s hyre than not having anyone. Okay, definite. Alright, just making that clear. Okay? Yeah. Okay. Yeah, but what’s important there is that when people sign their names, they’re more active in thinking about their identity, who they are. But when they simply print, they don’t think about being both kind and caring compassion. People ask much as if they signed the stamp, their own it and the answer. Those were very interesting. That is very interesting. So, so what’s really driving the effect we think at this point it’s. Not necessarily that non-profit professionals know about those words, but they have to. Think of ways to tap into people’s sense of who they are. And the link those central sons of who they are into those morally, you know, promoted kind of product. What kind of increase in fund-raising did you see in your research? Well, in the first study, it was a ten percent increase in, uh, female donors, um and that’s average give, say about huh? Eighty seven dollars, in the control group where people are simply think and is about one hundred when people think us moral towards okay. And in this direct meaning that we just had it tested it’s about, like, a five percent increase, they’re the average e-giving is much smaller because his christmas appeal so the average amount is, like thirteen pounds and, um, you know, eighteen dollars. But then the effect is about fifty piela it’s about twenty dollars. Okay. And also with women in the only only only an increase for women in the in the writing, or that does that apply to men also in the written form that that that that’s okay, so men are not immoral? No, no. At least not in a written sounds. Yeah, by no means that i think i’m just extrapolated i’m just taking a natural sametz seems like a natural conclusion for your research is that men in conversation are immoral. Well, not that that wouldn’t be how i know i know what i hope not know you’re using more different it’s a very different sense of saying something versus we were just not successful in bringing their own sense of morality to the front, so diplomats make a decision such a diplomatic, academic that’s beautiful, but really mentally moral no, of course, that’s an irrational conclusion, i really i think it is our failure on our part, so what we actually would like to test in the future is to tap into moral values that male might be more likely to engage in, like, responsible loyals strong take leadership pride, yeah, i think you’re i think you’re wasting your time with those just bein sports and cars i think is and booze, i think that’s where you really should be starting, you know, have a little budweiser icon that people sign and watermark that people sign over that will that’s going to get that anheuser busch logo. You know those of this? Where you want to be a corvette? You know, sign your name over this watermark of a corvette that will, i think that’s, where you’re going to see market market change in mark changing giving, we need to take a break right now. Gen shang, assistant professor at the centre on philanthropy at indiana university, is going to stay with me. We’re going to keep talking about five words to better fund-raising stay with us, you’re tuned to non-profit radio tony martignetti also hosts a podcast for the chronicle of philanthropy fund-raising fundamentals is a quick ten minute burst of fund-raising insights published once a month. Tony’s guests are expert in crowdfunding, mobile giving event fund-raising direct mail and donor cultivation really all the fund-raising issues that make you wonder, am i doing this right? Is there a better way there is? Find the fund-raising fundamentals archive it. Tony martignetti dot com that’s marketmesuite n e t t i remember there’s a g before the end, thousands of listeners have subscribed on itunes. You can also learn maura, the chronicle website philanthropy dot com fund-raising fundamentals the better way professor gen shang is with me. Jenn, you are a philanthropic psychologist. What is that here? Well, it’s, i’m interested in studying why people do philanthropy and what, uh, the doing of philosophy might do to their own life. Nasco what it might do to their own, like how it makes them feel how it makes them feel. How does that help them discover who they are defined their meaning in life and it’s, not a field i’m acquainted with. So how many philanthropic psychologists are there? Well, i only know one of me, but i’m sure they’re so yeah, you had some of these. Have you had some campaign to systematically eliminate all the other philanthropic psychologists? Well, actually, i haven’t done so because i would rather their mohr. Okay, you not the violent academic that’s a maybe you were the the that one percent violence academic, but that’s, not you. No, i was just, um, you know, i was the first graduated philanthropic phd from the canal philanthropy. In that sense, it’s, because the field didn’t exist aren’t annoying. Okay, out of the five people that we graduated already from that program, i was the only one who had a psychology background. Okay, there’s running through your research and you’ve mentioned it just obliquely a few times i want to spend a little time on it is feeling better, feeling better about giving and and reinforcing one’s beliefs about themselves. So say, say so let’s. Talk about that. Yeah. So, for example, in this some more identity e-giving research what we did after we did the experiment on the air it’s we send donorsearch survey and we asked them on the scale one tonight. How? Carrying. Actually, you think you are and then people silk road number like seven. And then we ask them on a scale of one tonight, how ideally would you like to become caring? And then people probably circle my i really, really want to become really, really caring. And then what we did is we calculate the difference between the two each we call more identities discrepancy. And then we link this number to the same person’s contribution history to the same radio station. And what we found is that the more females give the smaller. This gap is between their actual and their ideal morally identity. But this relationship does not exist. For males. So what this means is that the act of giving itself actually can potentially help female donors to rich. They’re more ideals and that’s. Great. Yes. To teo, get closer to what they believe of themselves already. Right? Exactly. Okay, yeah. Um, again, men out. Liars. You know, they don’t care how they feel. They don’t. They don’t have feelings. I don’t know what they’re thinking. They don’t know what they’re not giving that it’s. Unbelievable. What? What a disappointing gender. Well, what they’re thinking, what they’re giving couldn’t really be measured with the set for measurements we have. So i think the next step in my research is trying to find ways where we can find what men are thinking. Right? Well, there’s the cars and sports and booze that you know it’s. Okay, um, let’s. See? So this is academic research that can be immediately applied. And tha the telemarketing part, right? I mean, so is there any reason to think that if if the organization is calling out that there would be any different result? Uh, no, actually, we way are currently conducting any marketing. I don’t have the results yet. Okay, but because we don’t think there’s any reason why it wouldn’t work so you could be calling out and thanking someone for and thank someone for having been a a friendly or kind or helpful donorsearch the past and would you consider giving this year? Is that does that? Does that sound right to you? Yeah. Yeah, but what they need to do is they make sure that thing is somehow linked two people sense of their donation or they’re being a donor and that, i think, needs to be set right before they asked people to give again. Oh, right before okay. All right. Before you right at the beginning of the park. Or, you know, without knowing anything about the donor without asking them to at least answer one question to engage. Ok. Ok. So a little engagement, but then right before the ass. This this thanking right? Using one of the five moral adjectives two out of using to okayo. Excellent. All right, so you have to use two of the five? Yeah. We never has to. Just one because we’d be bilich virality is a complicated constructs he need, you know, multiple kind of ways to get to it. Excellent. Okay, so it’s friendly and kind or whatever. Yeah, any two out of five, you know, to avoid driving, fund-raising okay, and i’m going to say them again. Okay, i understand i’m going to say them again one more time. Caring, compassionate, friendly, kind, helpful. Do not do not go to the scout law, because it will lead you astray. They’ll beam, or that aren’t on the list that then then r this is sort of suggesting that, you know, we should be not so reliant on anecdotes and tales of what good fund-raising is. But try to rely on hard research as much as possible. Yes, definitely. Absolutely. Teo, any coat? Don’t make a piece of research. Okay. Okay. Where can people learn more about your research? Well, they can first search jin xiang on the web, and the first link comes up. Should be my website. All my published papers are on there. Okay, let me let me just tell people you’re last name is spelled s h a n g, right, gen shang. Okay, god, please. And then we my collaborator adrian. Sergeant who is the only chair anywhere on fund-raising we collaborative, lee maintain a public information website and it’s called www dot study fund-raising dot info. Okay, study fund-raising dot info. Exactly. So if if people just go there, we provide updated information about what research is is relevant in what domain. And, you know, we update that pure ops degree, and there we try to change all the academic language to a way that it’s more easily accessible. Gen shang is an assistant professor at the centre on philanthropy at indiana university jen, thank you so much for being a guest. Definitely. Thank you, it’s. Been a real pleasure. Thank you, thank you live. Listen to love. I am a p recorded today, so i can’t send actual live listen lover doing pre recorded live. Listen, love, live listeners. You know who you are, you’re the one’s, listening live, and i’m very, very grateful. Thank you very much for all the listeners and all the country’s checking in today podcast pleasantries to everybody listening every other time on whatever device you are, pleasantries to the ten thousand of you. Have tony’s take two and maria simple are next first generosity siri’s, the host, multi charity five k runs and walks. They have a charity support team, which is a team of people actual people that you talk to. This is not a bad team, but they help you in real time with your fund-raising you call them up and you talk to them on the phone and of course generosity siri’s has ah, online tools, a dashboard and all the management tools that you need online. But there’s this charity support team people you talk to to help you engage all the runners and walkers that you’re going to have helped to motivate them to that they’re asking all their networks, teo sponsor them, which all improves your fund-raising the charity support team generosity siri’s has events coming up in northern new jersey and miami. Talk to dave lynn, pick up the phone, talk he’s the c e o tell him from your your from non-profit radio. You’ll find him at seven one eight five o six. Nine, triple seven and of course, if you prefer, they are on the web. Naturally, everybody is generosity. Siri’s dot com i was dubbed a thought leader last week. Bye causevox the article is six dot leaders you need to follow, and the others are damp. A lotta sashadichter who’s been a guest on non-profit radio ken berger has also been a guest. Susan mcpherson and our own amy sample word, social media contributor here and ceo of inten so two thirds of us have been on and ah, a couple of us regularly are non-profit radio two thirds we got the article is six thought leaders you need to follow and it’s on the blogger at causevox cia, usc vox dot com very grateful to them, and i appreciate their support of non-profit radio they didn’t even know it and they were supporting non-profit radio where ubiquitous that’s tony’s take two for friday, twenty third of january show number three of the year. Maria semple is with me you know her she’s, the prospect finder, a trainer and speaker on prospect research. Our website is the prospect finder dot com and her book is panning for gold. Find your best donorsearch prospects now she’s our doi end of dirt cheap and free ideas you can follow her on twitter at maria simple fremery a simple how are you? I’m doing very well. How are you today? Very well to its happy new year for you and me. Because we haven’t talked in the new year. Yes, yes, i’ll tell you, i’m having a little trouble hearing you. Okay, well, trouble hearing me, uh, is it gonna work or you want to call back, or can you hear? Ok, well enough. I can hear you well enough. Okay, well enough will have to suffice. Sorry about that. You’re not on any unusual phone device, are you? Had said or anything? I am on the usual usual. Okay. Okay. I’m on the usual two. I’m here. Okay. All right. Uh, let’s. See about these, uh, e-giving circles. Well, let’s, let’s. Make sure everybody knows. I think i think these air pretty commonly understood, but let’s, make sure just in case what what’s e-giving circle. You know, tony basically e-giving circles really just a philanthropic vehicle where individual donors can pool their money and perhaps other resource is and really decide together where to give that pool of money away, too. So it’s a way for people to, um, to amplify their giving and really feel like even though they don’t consider themselves perhaps to be a major gift donor-centric sables them to feel like they can have a much stronger impact with their dollars in the community, and we could be talking about hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants. This is not like people chipping in five or ten bucks, but some of the giving circle gifts that i saw are really well into six figures. Oh, yes, absolutely. You know, they really do vary in size, but i would say kind of for the most part, they seem to have a minimum what i want to call entry level to be in that circle and the e-giving circles all themselves can decide what that e-giving level will be. But it is definitely, you know, an amount that’s much higher than a five or ten dollars gift level that’s for sure. Yeah, way looking into this and thinking about it makes me think of knitting circles. But it’s ah it’s different than knitting circles where well, they may be knitting things of great value, but just kind of seemed to me like, you know, the entry level would be like we said five or ten dollars. But and then some of the some of the e-giving circles, the people are quite wealthy, and they themselves are donating six figures to the circle. And then the circle is making million dollars grants. Yes, it really is fascinating. I mean, when even, you know, with the research that i did to prepare for this article, um, you know, i was looking at various places like new york times is even written on this back in november of twenty thirteen and so there’s a lot of people just google e-giving circles so they’ll find ah lot of articles have been written not only through the new york times, but the chronicle has had quite a number of articles where they focused but on this idea of e-giving circles. And so i just thought it would make an interesting discussion for ah topic for your show, because, of course, non-profits you know, they need to be aware that the circles exist and how do you come to the attention of the circles? Okay, we’re going. We’re going to come to that. And i know you’re in e-giving circle and we, um, actually i know. So we have a little extra time more than usual today, so we’re going we’ll have a chance to talk about your own experience in your giving circle. I see it looks like these air, mostly for women, not exclusively, but mostly women’s circles. They are very popular amongst women and, you know, of course, because of my own association to a group of women in a giving circle, you know, i really thought that that was just, you know, the predominance of it. But then i came across an article in the chronicle that was only done within the last year, back in july of twenty fourteen, and the article talked about how they’re also very popular amongst minorities and younger donors, so that was intriguing, you know, that goes my knitting circle analogy, right? And, you know, non-profits are forever trying to figure out how do we engage that next level of generation of donors? And how do we engage a younger pool of donors might really be a great way to do that. So you’re s o there are circles of women who are younger and guys who are younger, too. Yeah, okay, we’ll get we’ll get to that. To, um and also these circles are not onl e-giving cash there’s other levels of participation. Yeah, i mean, you know, you can decide how how in depth you want to participate in the circle. Some people would really prefer just to write their check annually and really have very little interaction with the circle. Other people want to be much more engaged in deciding how the funds will be dispersed and again e-giving circles have various ways that they decide how that’s going to happen from perhaps an annual gathering where there’s a vote taken on a very select pool of non-profits that have been filtered out bye, perhaps more of an executive committee of that e-giving circle. Or they might be coming together and meeting quarterly to try and decide on looking to fix certain things that are going wrong in their community and trying to identify well what are their non-profits that are actually addressing these issues and what seek them out and actually contribute to those organizations, and then also in terms of support to the organization, going beyond money, the mentor ship is a possibility volunteering at an organization that the circle is supporting, yes. Absolutely so. So think about, you know, the level of engagement. And perhaps the gift amounts to those circles might increase the more engaged you have that person as a volunteer within the giving circle and perhaps volunteering then for the organizations to whom wth e-giving circle contribute. So there’s, i was reading something about managerial support. Basically the the executive director of ah small non-profit that initially got a grant of fifteen thousand dollars. Then she was going on to a a larger grantcraft petition which got it, which she won for over two hundred thousand dollars and the giving circle that had initially supported her. I was giving her marketing and presentation advice for the for the pitch to the larger foundation. Yes, yes, i saw that same article. I mean, it really is fascinating how the whole thing khun really continue to have this this ripple effect. And you know, when you think about circles and then you think about the ripple effect right of ah, concentric circle. If you if you throw a a pebble into a pond, you can really see how it can have so many different ways of impacting the community and the e-giving circle itself. Yeah. It’s, it’s really interesting people are getting more involved through giving circles than just giving money and and often it’s smaller. Very often, it seems like smaller organizations that can use that extra level of help beyond just cash. Yes, absolutely. All right. Um, well, that’s that’s diving a little bit, too. What a non-profit could be doing tio discover local giving circles well, you know, certainly networking within their own communities. I think we’ve talked about this before on the show in terms of china identify major gift prospects. It’s it’s kind of that same process if you’re not out there and attending perhaps local chamber events and other events, maybe even meet up, look for meet ups where you’re going tohave on meetup dot com where you’re going tohave ah ah gathering of people like minded people around, maybe high tech ventures or real estate investors, things like that, you know, you you might come across somebody who is then, you know, talking about ah particular e-giving circle in the community. So i think you just have to get yourself out in the community and literally in front of and shaking hands with some. Of the people who are probably in these e-giving circles and without getting out there and learning about them, um, it’s going to be more difficult to find them? Of course, you know, we’ll talk during this interview about some ways to find them online as well, but there is just there’s nothing to substitute that getting out there and shaking hands and meeting people to find out who the movers and shakers are don’t think this is an interview. That’s so formal is it’s a conversation? We’re friend okay? Yeah, as our diane of dirt cheap and free, you’re a very big advocate of the local chambers of commerce groups and meetings, right? Yes, absolutely. You know, it’s it’s that that shoestring budget mentality, i suppose, um and, you know, trying to figure out how do you make the most of your time and the resources that you have available to you? Yeah. Okay, on da. All right, so you need to be out in the community. You couldn’t even be asking your existing donor and volunteer base. I mean, start with start with the people. You know, a swell is going to the broader community. But start with people who, you know, are close to the organization already asked them if they know of e-giving circles in the community, whether they remember or not. Yeah, i think this would make a great discussion as part of a board meeting. Or perhaps, why don’t you take a look at some of the websites that we’re going to be discussing today and maybe bookmarking some of them and sending them along to your board and keep volunteers and asking them if they’re aware of any e-giving circle? So not only are you going to keep your antenna up for them, but you’re going to want to, you know, bring this to the attention of of your board, um, so that they’re aware that they should be looking for these. They’re out networking in the community? Yes. Excellent. Okay, what do we have online? Wise online? Why say i found a number of things. So i found out that there was a report called connected teo give. That was done by a new organization called jump start lab. And what they were doing was they were looking to do research about giving circles and in particular, within the jewish community and as a result, they actually launched a website uh, which is called when they make sure i get the name of the website correct. And while maria simple searches for the website, well, ah, we’ll do a little tap dance on dh hope that she finds her notes very quickly on giving circles, and this is connected to give this is a place to find the connected to give report, is that right, maria? Yes, so it is. It is connected to give report, but the website itself and i’m almost there hang on one moment, though it’s called amplifier. Um, so the website is amplifier giving dot or gq, and so if we’ve got any jewish charities who are listening in on this call, this is a web site they’ll definitely want to go to because it hasn’t you have an opportunity not on ly too learn about giving circles, but there are ways to figure out how to be, how to come to the attention of them through this particular website. So again, i think it’s kind of interesting that this has this has come about for the jewish community, and i wouldn’t be surprised if we’re now going to start seeing other web sights. And this again came to my my attention through an article that i found in the chronicle. Okay, but so are you saying that site is devoted to e-giving circles for the jewish non-profits and communities? Yes, exactly. Okay, specifically. All right. Do we have one for the for the catholics? I you know what martignetti martignetti martignetti here. If i was anything, i would e should be guys like i would be eyes or anything for them. I haven’t delved into id. Let’s, let’s put it this way. I haven’t actually come across any articles that deal with this particular topic, but that would be something interesting research whether we have any more secular. Well, i’m sure you have some secular websites. Um, no, that would be the one that i would say would be most secular. But there are a number that have to do more with women’s collective e-giving. In fact, one of them is called the women’s collective e-giving grantmaker sze network. And that website is double u c g n dash network dot org’s. And they are all about women powered philanthropy. And so you actually can go. Too there’s. They actually have a map of the united states, and they actually outline, you know that the thirty eight, they call them independent collective e-giving groups, and they say that they over have over seventy, six hundred women in those particular groups. Okay, that would be an interesting website. Check out and again, that was w, c, g and hyphen, network dot or ge. Okay, let’s. Ah, marie, let’s, go out for a break. I just got a correct you on one thing. Secular, secular means it’s, it’s, not religious. So i was asking if you had other nonreligious ones, which you just get very about that’s. Okay, that’s. Okay, uh, we’ll go out for break maria semple, and i’ll continue our talk on giving circles and also going to hear about her personal experience in one stay with us. Like what you’re hearing a non-profit radio tony’s got more on youtube, you’ll find clips from stand up comedy tv spots and exclusive interviews catch guests like seth gordon. Craig newmark, the founder of craigslist marquis of eco enterprises, charles best from donors choose dot org’s aria finger, do something that worked neo-sage levine from new york universities heimans center on philantech tony tweets to he finds the best content from the most knowledgeable, interesting people in and around non-profits to share on his stream. If you have valuable info, he wants to re tweet you during the show. You can join the conversation on twitter using hashtag non-profit radio twitter is an easy way to reach tony he’s at tony martignetti narasimhan t i g e n e t t i remember there’s a g before the end he hosts a podcast for the chronicle of philanthropy fund-raising fundamentals is a short monthly show devoted to getting over your fund-raising hartals just like non-profit radio, toni talks to leading thinkers, experts and cool people with great ideas. As one fan said, tony picks their brains and i don’t have to leave my office fund-raising fundamentals was recently dubbed the most helpful non-profit podcast you have ever heard. You can also join the conversation on facebook, where you can ask questions before or after the show. The guests were there, too. Get insider show alerts by email, tony tells you who’s on each week and always includes link so that you can contact guests directly. To sign up, visit the facebook page for tony martignetti dot com. Oppcoll rob mitchell is going to be a guest next week when we’re talking about thea atlas of giving twenty fourteen fund-raising analysis and their twenty fifteen forecast. So see, the show is the show, it does not just fall together contrary to belief, the things things are actually planned out here, okay? Because it’s not seen mario so morris amore websites for ah, from our doi end of dirt cheap. Okay, sure. So one of the other things that i came across was a report that was done in two thousand seven. Tony, i know one of the questions that you had for me and preparing for this show was, well, exactly how many e-giving circles are there in the united states and or perhaps internationally, and you know what? How much money are they giving away? Um, so i tried to dig deep and hard to find the answer to that, and of course, it was kind of heart to catalogue all of them. But there was a study called more giving together the growth and impact of e-giving circles and shared e-giving and it was released in two thousand seven, and what they said was that as of two thousand six so you can imagine that was a number of years ago. There were four hundred catalog e-giving circles in forty four states, and ah, a lot of them had raised, you know, a lot of money they had raised at that point over eighty eight million dollars since their inception. That was nine. And that was nine years ago. Yeah, cells, i’m quite certain that it has probably grown quite a bit, but one of the sights that i was able to find that actually had giving circles listed by state is called e-giving circles dot or ge so that’s an easy one to remember. Okay? And you can actually look state by state and try and find those particular e-giving circles. So i think it be great for the non-profits listening on this tio two checks us out because not only do they list, um, state by state, but they do have a couple of global e-giving circles listed here as well. Um, a lot of them are actually based in the u s, but they’re e-giving they’re focused on giving is international. Yeah, okay, excellent for international. But but you also want to be paying attention to the ones that maybe in your own, much closer to you in your own community vicinity with e-giving exactly e-giving circle e-giving circles dunaj i’m based in new jersey, for example, and i see that there are three listed here, the one that i’m part of is not even listed on here. So mom it’s the one that i’m part of it not listed on here, you can imagine there are probably, you know, a number of others that aren’t listed here as well. I can’t imagine that i and i know for sure that there are at least there’s mine and another chapter called i think it’s called impact one hundred, based in new jersey that are not even listed on here, so they probably have not even been able to compile every single one of them, even on this website. Either that or you’re living in some kind of a fantasy world, some kind of e-giving circle fantasy world where you imagine these circles around you, but they don’t really exist, and sometimes they overlap. But you wouldn’t know if you were in that fantasy world, so well, i’ll give you the benefit of doubt since i know you will presume that that’s, not the case. I will assume i should say we’ll assume that that’s not the case. Uh, all right. So so it’s even more than they list, but they’re not keeping up. They’re not keeping up to date. You got to get your own circle listed. Well, that that’s? Yeah. That’s part of my purpose. And i came across this research i thought always gotta get are listed here. Um, how would you recommend approaching? And we’ll get a yeah. You know, you could bring in some of your own experience to, but how would you recommend approaching these giving circles? They may and may not have websites or, you know, they don’t have program officers. How do you, uh, how you gonna get in there once you find them? I think. It’s, you know, it depends on the e-giving circle itself. Some might have a more formal website and process maybe even a grant application process for approaching them. Others, if you can at least find out who perhaps some of the people are that are kind of heading up. That e-giving circle. You can go the lincoln route, right? Why not? Try and make a connection with them on lincoln and have that turn into a cup of coffee to discuss you know what your non-profit is doing and letting that giving circle know that their particular mission that they’ve outlined happens to coincide with thie services and programs that your particular non-profit provides. How would you get to the membership? The names? How how is that possible? Well, some of them actually will have website, and then through that they’ll be usually in about us link so so think of it is researching a foundation, for example, where you confined, you know who the contact person is to reach out to if you were going to be submitting a grant application and so forth. But if they don’t have any way to contact through the website, i’m sure you could probably at least find a name of a person connected and again, just google that name, and you’re very likely to come up to, at minimum there lengthen profile, okay? And then this is where the board could be helpful, too. Even if you’re not able to find a name of a member, if you can least find the name. Of the circle, as you suggested earlier, you could float that to your board say, you know not just do you know of any circles in the area, but we’ve identified a couple here’s the ones we can’t find any of the members or here’s a couple member names we did find, you know, can you help us out in any other case? Yeah, yeah, you got a cz you’ve suggested before with with prospect research using using your boards networks? Absolutely. And, you know, one of the other things that i thought would be interesting because one of the reports that i read actually alluded to this is why not have as a non-profit why not launch your own e-giving circle, right? So you probably have somewhat of a form of this already, but this could be another interesting e-giving vehicle for your non-profit so you might be calling it something like a e-giving society right now, and you know it, maybe just changing the language around it. Um, do people want to belong to societies? Where do they want to belong to circles? There’s, there’s definitely a different connotation, i think. And and maybe you want to have both i don’t know, but i think it be kind of interesting for a non-profit to se gi, you know, i’ve done some research, i’m not finding any e-giving circles that we can approach in our community, so, you know, let’s, consider launching our own and coming up with that minimum gift amount that it would take to join that giving circle, and then what are the parameters around? What will membership in that giving circle include if we start this at our organization, i think that could be on effective way to start a new, major gift giving level in the year twenty fifteen for the non-profits on the call, okay? Ah, well, you and i are calling you know, they’re listening all different methods, but i’m, um i’m mincing, i’m being quibbling with you? Um, yeah, now interesting. Ah, okay, you’re kind of conflating what are typically called recognition societies with what we’re talking about giving circles that is that that’s sort of what you’re doing? Yeah, i mean, you could certainly start your own and, you know, try and find out well, what are some of what they’re actually guide? Um, that particular website that i mentioned amplifier they’ve actually got some really terrific resource is on there, even though this is meant for the jewish community. There’s still a lot of great resource is on that site that i came across a lot of great downloads that talk about how to start e-giving circle, what are some of the, you know, guidelines that you want to put around the circle? Here’s a sample letter that you can send out letting people know that e-giving circle has been started, so they did. I would say that that is going to be a really good resource, regardless of whether you’re in the jewish e-giving space, because you’re going to be able to garner a lot of free resource is right there in creating your own giving circle through your non-profit let’s, let’s, talk a little about your own experience what’s the name of your new jersey e-giving circle so i’m part of one that is part of united way of northern new jersey. They have women’s leadership council, and through that we have the leadership e-giving circle, which entails a one thousand dollars annual commitment tooth e-giving circle and like any good major gift level. Ah, uh, donation. You can actually spread that out throughout the year. You can attach it to a credit card and so forth. So it is definitely a way to get people in the circle if you can break it down for them in that way. Because you said and that’s the one part of you said yours is a women’s only circle. Is that right? Yes. That’s correct. Why’s. That why’s that, i suppose, uh, i mean, i was born in new jersey. Suppose i wanted to join that or some other man, but i like to use me as an example. Center of the universe. Um, suppose i wanted to join what? On what basis would you reject me? You know what? We probably wouldn’t reject any man. Now i need it just happens to be the name of of the order. You know, the organization and that that united way it’s set up. They have women’s leadership councils all across the united states. Um, i have not attended any of the events and so forth outside of my own region, but i’m quite certain they probably do have some men connected, you know, at various levels. Um, i know that. We had an event recently where we did have and very much welcomed a man teo, join us in a small event that we had to go and, um all right, well, that’s encouraging, i’m glad i’m glad he was very much welcomed. Also, uh, how does your circle decide what organization organizations it’s going to support each year? So when we launched, it was about it was just under five years ago, we decided that we would focus on getting women more financially stable and an education being a way to do this, but we’re actually partnering up with the local community college here, the raritan valley community college and their educational foundation, so through that were able to help what we’re calling the nontraditional student with some gap funding. So the colleges, perhaps providing the scholarship assistance and so forth, and we’re providing some of the gaps funding needs that that particular student might have that’s going to hamper their ability to complete that educational process. So it’s typically in a lot of cases, it’s, the single mother returning to school for education and looking and has perhaps, you know, want at least one child at home and is looking to yet get some additional funding in place to make that education happens. No might might mean child care or whatever, whatever it takes. Your circle then is only supporting the raritan valley community college well within win women’s leadership council in northern new jersey were connected with a number of community colleges. Also centenary college in north west new jersey. So that’s, the way that were structured is is partnering up with a community college and college is focused around the topic of education, economic, that specific, that specific issue. Now we have just like a minute and a half left or so. How often does your circle meat we meet? Probably on average quarterly throughout the year, and then we stay in touch through email the rest of the time. How do you decide which of the colleges you’re going to make grants to? And we just have about a minute left maria again. It’s very localized here in somerset county were were partnered up with already raritan valley college, so that that was decided pretty early on in the e-giving circle history, okay? And the larger organization is supporting other community college is not your not your individual circle. Okay, right. But circles can decide toe support. Multiple charities. Certainly that’s. Just that’s. Just not the way yours is going. Okay, correct. All right. Thank you very much, maria. Thank you, e-giving circles cool. You’ll find her at maria simple on twitter. And her sight is the prospect finder. Dot com again. Thanks, maria. Thank you. Next week, the atlas of giving as i mentioned the twenty fourteen fund-raising analysis and twenty fifteen forecast. And along with the ceo rob mitchell, we’re gonna have professors paul schervish and doug white. If you missed any part of today’s show, find it at tony martignetti dot com generosity siri’s you know that good things happen when small and midsize charities come together for a fundraising event. Generosity. Siri’s dot com. Our creative producers claire meyerhoff. Sam liebowitz is the line producer show social media is by susan chavez, susan chavez, dot com and the remote producer of tony martignetti non-profit radio is john federico of the new rules. Our music is by scott stein you with me next week for non-profit radio big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent go out and be great. What’s not to love about non-profit radio tony gets the best guests check this out from seth godin this’s the first revolution since tv nineteen fifty and henry ford nineteen twenty it’s the revolution of our lifetime here’s a smart, simple idea from craigslist founder craig newmark yeah insights, orn presentation or anything? People don’t really need the fancy stuff they need something which is simple and fast. When’s the best time to post on facebook facebook’s andrew noise nose at traffic is at an all time hyre on nine am or eight pm. So that’s when you should be posting your most meaningful post here’s aria finger ceo of do something dot or ge young people are not going to be involved in social change if it’s boring and they don’t see the impact of what they’re doing so you gotta make it fun and applicable to these young people look so otherwise a fifteen and sixteen year old they have better things to do if they have xbox, they have tv, they have their cell phones me dar is the founder of idealised took two or three years for foundation staff to sort of dane toe add an email address their card. It was like it was phone. This email thing is fired-up that’s why should i give it away? Charles best founded donors choose dot or ge somehow they’ve gotten in touch kind of off line as it were and and no two exchanges of brownies and visits and physical gift mark echo is the founder and ceo of eco enterprises. You may be wearing his hoodies and shirts. Tony talked to him. Yeah, you know, i just i’m a big believer that’s not what you make in life. It sze, you know, tell you make people feel this is public radio host majora carter. Innovation is in the power of understanding that you don’t just do it. You put money on a situation expected to hell. You put money in a situation and invested and expected to grow and savvy advice for success from eric sacristan. What separates those who achieve from those who do not is in direct proportion to one’s ability to ask others for help. The smartest experts and leading thinkers air on tony martignetti non-profit radio big non-profit ideas for the other ninety five percent.