Renee Rubin Ross: Your 5-Step Inclusive Strategic Plan
The author of the book “Inclusive Strategic Planning for Nonprofits,” talks you through her strategy of kickoff; discovery; prioritization; planning; and, implementation. She makes your plan a valuable, living resource, rather than a dusty volume sitting on your shelf. Renee Rubin Ross is CEO of The Ross Collective.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d bear the pain of chromycosis if you infected me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, with what’s coming. Hey Tony, here’s what’s coming. Your five-step inclusive strategic plan. The author of the book, Inclusive Strategic Planning for Nonprofits, talks you through her strategy of kickoff, discovery, prioritization, planning, and implementation. She makes your plan a valuable living resource, rather than a dusty volume sitting on your shelf. Renee Rubin Ross is CEO of the Ross Collective. On Tony’s take 2. We’re at 26 NTC. Here is your five-step inclusive strategic plan. It’s a pleasure to welcome back to nonprofit radio, a recognized leader on board and organizational development and strategy. Doctor Renee Ruben Ross is the founder and CEO of the Ross Collective Consulting Practice. Her new book is Inclusive Strategic Planning for Nonprofits, a five-step Process to expand Energy, alignment and Opportunity. Her company is at the Ross Collective.com. And Renee is on LinkedIn. Renee, Ruben Ross, welcome back to Nonprofit Radio. So good to be here. Last time we met, it was, we were in person at NTC a couple of years ago. It was the one of the NTCs a couple of years ago. Um, this is less hectic and, uh, and longer. We have more time together. Congratulations on the new book. Oh, it’s so exciting. Yeah, thank you. I know it’s a huge undertaking. Congratulations. Congratulations. Lots of people have books in mind that that never get written. Yours, yours as. Well, it took a few, it took some time and lots of, lots of support, which we could talk about, but, um, lots of, it was an inclusive process actually to, to write this book. Yeah, Outstanding. Then you’re, then you’re walking your walk. Very good, very good. Um, I don’t know if I called this out when you. And I were at NTC together, but, you know, I’m a huge fan of alliteration. And you are Renee Ruben Ross. I just love that your family was able to put it together and then, and then you, yeah, did you marry someone named Ross and Ruben is, yes, my partner is is, yes, your partner Ross. So I, yeah, I love it. I love it. It all came together, Renee, Ruben, Ross. I like our three. Triple R R 3, you’re like, you could be a ranch or to, uh, to do, you know, make that happen really besides, you know, no, I’m sure, but good fortune. I wish my family, I’d like, I, I, I, I wouldn’t be mine like Matthew Martinetti or I don’t know, I don’t, I don’t wanna change my surname, but maybe the first name. But no, I, I’ve, you know, I’m a big, I’m just a big fan of alliterations, so. So let’s talk about inclusive strategic planning. Why don’t you, why don’t you, uh, I mean, just high-level view. What is inclusive strategic planning? Yeah thanks for the question so um so one of the one of the key ideas in the book is there are different people who participate in planning and what what I was trying to get at is there’s a lot of books that are about the the tools and the process and all of that and um I you know refer to some of those but what we’re talking about what I’m talking about in this book is really about who is in the room doing the visioning and building. The goals and the importance of making that an inclusive process so I have this one graphic which is this idea of um deciders, builders and sharers and a lot of processes have deciders that’s pretty obvious what that is a lot of processes have sharers those are the people doing focus groups interviews, all of that sharing their perspective it’s really the builders that make this unique and that is having a wider group who’s going. To be weighing in on their own future and I think that in these times more than ever we need people we need to incorporate people’s perspectives in whatever’s gonna happen next we need people to feel like my voice matters, my, my perspective matters and and that’s what an inclusive process is. So this is not a strategic planning process that the board goes off onto a retreat at a country club for, for a weekend. And comes back, uh, they’ve met with the CEO and maybe the chief development officer and the CFO, and then they, and then at the end of the weekend, we foist on the nonprofit, the 3 to 5 year strategic plan, the 5-year strategic plan. That that’s not, this is not that. I teach a class. I teach a class through Cal State East Bay in strategic planning, and I have a lot of people that come to my, I have some people that have come to my class. Who have experienced strategic planning trauma exactly what you’re describing where it’s like wait we got this thing we don’t know where it came from we don’t know who thought of this this doesn’t make sense to us we don’t feel invested in it and all of that and so this is this really from the beginning it is designed in to say. Um, who are the people who are, who first of all, who, for example, um, I’m doing a retreat tomorrow and the many of the staff members will be there talking about their perspective on the on this organization’s work. Uh, talking about, you know, their experience working with the young people that the organization serves, and then they get to then the staff and the and some of the board members as well get to build that final plan and and set their goals, all of that and that really um it creates a plan that people feel like yeah this is doable we wanna do this these are the right next steps for our organization. Well, you’re getting the buy-in from the people. You’re saying like the builders, to me, the builders sounds like, uh, uh, I’m making an analogy to, to middle management. It sounds like it’s the middle managers. You’re getting buy-in from the folks who the plan. Largely impacts because they’re the ones carrying out the strategic plan. Yeah, and by the way, I mean that, thank you for that point. Um, so one of the things that, that I did in writing this book, I actually, I had a manuscript, and then I, um, I did, I opened it up to a lot of beta readers, and I got a lot of, um, a lot of feedback. And one of the pieces of feedback was, well, who is this book for? And originally, I, like, in my mind, originally it was like, oh, I’ll just, this is a book that I’ll just give to prospective clients and they’ll understand. And our work better. But then people said, no, you know, these processes can be used by a lot of people. So I think that the builders could be every, if it’s a small organization and you have a working board, it might be that the whole board, and there’s one staff person, the whole board and what that one staff person, that those are the builders. It may be that the board and staff together are builders and it also might be like we work with with an organization. Um, recently or a couple of years ago that they had 55 people who came to the retreat and worked together with us to say, you know, what do you, what do we, we have this question, what do we, this visioning question, what do we want to see in place in the next 3 years as a result of our actions, so it’s a practical vision and. Everyone in the staff got to, got to, you know, based on our the work that we’re doing every day, here’s what we want to make happen so it doesn’t have to just be, I mean, I think it depends on the size of the organization, obviously, um, we just heard from an. Organization that has over 100 employees, it’s really difficult to, you know, you are gonna, not every, not everyone’s going to be able to be in the room in that kind of case. Yeah, I just meant it as an analogy like it’s, it’s the, it’s the middle management of strategic plan implementation. Like these, these are the folks who are gonna be doing the work to carry out the plan. So you’re, so you’re getting the buy-in of the, you know, the builders. You, you call them the builders. Um, you, you, so you’re, you’re including them in the process. Obviously, if they’re included, they’re, I, I think it’s obvious, they’re more likely to be enthusiastic about it. Rather than what I laid out, you know, the country club plan after a weekend with the board, and, and, and half the strategic plan was developed over, over glasses of wine, right? Or, OK, someone says that we’re supposed to raise $3 million but that’s not very realistic for, you know, the fact that we have the, the development staff that we have now, you know, so do a year fundraising operation, the $3 million is not realistic in the next 3 years. All right, all right. Um, OK, so, you know, you, you’re bringing people in, it’s, it’s, it’s equitable, um, inclusive. How do we know? When we’re ready for. A strategic planning initiative. What do we need to have in place? What do we need to think through? What do we need to maybe do for the year before leading up to, you know, what, what, like, how do we get our head around, like, if we feel like we, we, we, we, we, we could use a vision for a 3 to 5 year plan, what, what do we need to have in place first? Yeah, and so this is such an important question. Um, I think that there is a lot of information about strategic planning out there. And so sometimes we hear. From people who will say, oh, I’m, you know, I’m starting on my organization. I want to build a strategic plan and no, you do not need if you’re about to create what you if you’re creating an organization, what you need to do at that point is actually start building your organization. You don’t need to, you don’t have enough complexity and actually, you know, time under your your time and time of running the organization to start doing a real. Deep strategy work, um, so I have a, a little grid in the book. It’s also on I’ve written about this in the past where you can look at two questions, uh, what is our programmatic stability and what is our financial stability, and you want both of those to be, uh, you want at least one of those to be high and hopefully both of them, uh, before you start to do some strategic planning. So if you’re not there yet, there are things you can do you can, uh, do an action plan for the year and think about, OK, we know that right now our fundraising is a little wobbly. What do we want? What are some steps we can take in the next year? Who’s gonna do those steps? And I do have a section in the book about action planning. Um, and so either both looking at your financial stability and also your programmatic stability, do we have a sense of our core programs and how well they’re working? OK, I was just gonna pull on that a little bit. What, what does programmatic strength look like? Yeah, I think, uh, a track record of success basically like if um you want to be able to say, um, we know this is working, it is, uh, wrecking we’re getting some funding for it from the community we have some client, you know, we, we have some client feedback that this works, all of that and so, uh, we can keep building on it basically, OK, and financial stability, what does that, what, what is that? Is that the x axis or the y axis? Programmatic, right, which it doesn’t really matter. You can do either one. They’re, they’re both got the two axes, exactly, and you got, so you got 4 quadrants. OK, it doesn’t matter as long as you got the 4 quadrants. All right, what is financial stability is really, um, we have a sense of where our funding is coming from, um, that, uh, we have some, you know, whatever our funding model is, it’s been worked out versus we have no idea where we’re gonna get funding. For next year that’s not the time to do strategic planning if that’s your situation, the first thing you really want to do is shore up your finances and then OK then let’s come back and um strategy is much more about what choices are we gonna make now you know OK we have we have a couple different programs maybe we’re gonna need to um stop doing something because our work is getting complex and there’s a lot of demand for it. And both of these would Suggest that, well, not suggest, demand that a new organization like you were, you were suggesting, you know, hypothesizing new organization wants to start strategic planning. They have no programmatic stability. They don’t know if their programs work. They have no outcomes yet, and they don’t have financial stability because they’re a new organization. They don’t, they don’t know where their funding is gonna come from. They don’t even know if they’re gonna get funding. So, like a, you know, a, a 1 or 2 year old nonprofit shouldn’t be engaged in strategic planning. Right, um, I mentioned this, um, this case in the book of a couple of years ago working with SOS Meals on Wheels, uh, here in Northern California and the challenge that they had was that, uh, the executive director had a lot of conversations with the board, a lot of conversations with the staff, and people hadn’t really come together to figure out what. Focus on um and one of one of the things that emerged in in the plan was, OK, we need a bigger kitchen and that will allow us to do more, you know, more deliveries per week and then we won’t have to be, or I guess it’s actually fewer deliveries per week so we won’t have to be driving our trucks all around. Just by coming together and agreeing on this, they were able to make it happen within a year and it’s really kind of amazing and it wasn’t like something that no one had ever thought of it was just getting that alignment of getting everyone in the room to get that focus. And that’s really what, what, uh, strategic planning is, but just going back to, you know, what we were talking about when you’re just starting out, you don’t, you don’t necessarily need to get everyone aligned. You kind of just need to start doing your work and prove that it works. Yeah, right, get out there, and, and, and meet folks and do the and do the work. OK. What are the, what are the deliverables of a strategic plan? What, what kind of, what are we looking for from this? Yeah, usually, um, a this kind of practical vision, uh, we will look at the mission statement and look at some often look at mission statements from comparable organizations think about what kind of language are people using now and does that need to, you know, does so does the mission statement need to be revised and then we’ll, we’ll create some strategies and goals. And we go to a one year implementation plan and really uh often we’ll be working with organizations to take that implementation plan and put get it into the work plan of the organization so you’re going from 3 to really mostly 3, a 3 year plan, 3 years to 1 year to quarters to what is the uh weekly work of the, of, you know, of people on the staff. OK, OK. And I, I know implementation is the, the 5th of your 5 steps, but it’s so critical because there’s so many plans that just get written and created and then, I don’t know, just put on a shelf. I mean, they’re not, they’re not referenced. You know, that’s a, that to me that’s that that that was just a wasted exercise like check mark, check mark, check box. OK, we’ve got a strategic plan we could, we could tell the funders we have a strategic plan, right. And so I, so that’s where, so a couple things. So one thing is we talk a lot about this is process and product. So as you’re Going along you want to think about uh what is important to me? Why do I care about this and that that really goes in the plan and so by the time you have a plan created that um it’s something that makes sense right? that there is that that energy and alignment but at the same time. Yes, you’re absolutely right that and I think that um people are, it’s like, OK, we’re going to get to the destination and then in our and then we’re going to stop there. It’s like, mm, well, and in my book, I actually talk about this thing, this phenomenon of the place where our problems are solved, right? Yeah, this is not it. We, we may have in mind, you know, maybe if I just, I don’t know, you know, if I just, uh, found a partner, if I just whatever, had children, if I just, uh, you know, got a certain education, wrote a book, right, or created a strategic plan, all problems would be solved. And I, I would be the first to, I wish life worked that way, you know. And and it doesn’t and you need to know that you need to know that you will have your plan but then new questions will emerge and and some of them are around um are there things we need to stop because that actually is being strategic to say we can’t do everything um that we’re we’re a great organization there’s a lot of demand from the community we cannot do everything. Um, and then the other piece is, yeah, how do we slow down and really, um, if we’ve been always reactive, can we start to think about where, how do we, um, determine what we’re focusing on and find, create a system to put that into our, you know, to, to our work plan and that and it’s not easy. I, I, you know, it’s not easy, yeah, I’m glad we spent some time on, on the implementation even though it’s the final step. I, I. Yeah, it, it, it deserves a lot of focus because there, this is a big undertaking. Uh, it can be expensive in time and money. Um, and it, it takes a lot of thought. You know, it’s not something you can task somebody. I mean, you know, task in a half an hour, I need your contribution to the strategic plan, please. It’s 1 o’clock. I, I, I need it before you go to lunch. You know, it doesn’t, it’s not like that. So, we’re investing a lot into the process. It has to be, it has to be carried through. In, in, and, and implemented and used and relied on and, and looked back to and, and counted on. Right, right, right. And, and, and by the way, I mean, oh my gosh, so many things to say about this by the staff as well as the board. And so that is, you know, when, when I talk with an organization, I will say, well, how often is the staff referring to the strategic plan? Um, how often is the board, you know, what is the board responsible for in this plan and how are they doing on that and what else? Is there to talk? I mean, there should be, and I do talk about that in the book too. There should be sections for the, for the board as well. Maybe that’s around fundraising or oversight or whatever it is, um, connecting, you know, making connections for the organization, being that serving in that ambassador role, um, but the other piece is that it is important to sketch out. OK, now that we know what our, our goals are, who’s gonna be responsible for those goals and how and do we have the capacity to, to do this? So we had an organization that created, you know, there are different tools you can use as an RACI, which is responsible accountable, and there’s a couple of different, I don’t know if you’ve heard of that RACI chart, I think it’s called Rock Rocky or something. And um, you gotta watch that, you gotta watch jargon jail. I gotta, I gotta, I gotta lock you up in jargon jail. If you, if you can’t, if you can’t define the acronym, you can’t use it. Uh oh, OK, well, um, I hadn’t heard of this before, but our client was using this, and it’s, so it’s like different people have different roles in project management, basically. That’s what this is about. And so what they found out was that this poor executive director was going to be responsible for. 15 new initiatives, you know, and there was just no way that that was one or two, right. And so, so what they had to do was, again, slow down and say, all right, this person, they, we want to implement the strategic plan, we’re going to need to hire somebody who’s going to be, who’s going to be working on some of these pieces because we don’t have it in our current configuration. So thank you. I, I, I wanted to spend time on the the value of the strategic plan, uh, uh, that, that we’re investing all this time and money into and, and how it needs to be, you know, the, it is, it’s the plan. So follow the plan. All right. But let’s go to the five steps, which are, I’m just gonna tick them off quick. Uh, kickoff, discovery, prioritization, planning, and implementation. What’s our, what’s our kickoff step? What is that, so now we decided we are ready. We’ve done the, we’ve done the, the groundwork to, uh, to make sure that we are financially and programmatically. Stable, uh, we, we did have a lot of discussion around which is the X axis and which is the Y axis, but we were able to overcome, we were able to overcome that, that, uh, dissension within the organization. No, no, no, program is the ground. It belongs on the ground. Program should be the X, and the finances should be raising. All right, so we overcame, we overcame that, uh, that, that conflict within the organization, and we, we decide we’re ready. So what is our, what is kickoff. Yeah, kickoff is, is really, um, is to set it up to try to, so if this is an inclusive process, then being more open and transparent about information. Uh, what are, what is planning? Some people may have done a lot of strategic planning in the past. Some people are very new to it. What is the step? What are the steps gonna be? People have questions around, um, how much time is this gonna take? And, and so, and then also starting to figure out who’s gonna be, uh, who will be those sharers, right? Who’s gonna be consulted in interviews and focus groups. Possibly a survey and uh you know, is there gonna be some we usually do a day or a day and a half retreat when is that gonna be? um and even being transparent about about decision making again is a way to say OK these are the final deciders is this group all this this other larger group is gonna be the builders and. These other people are going to be sharing their perspective. Um, so really that kickoff is really just setting it up and um trying to help people, you know, have this be a fun learning experience, decreasing some of the feelings of, oh, I don’t know what this is, and so I feel worried that it’s not going to go well, you know. So you, you said, uh, you usually do a day and a half retreat. So now we’re now going back to the, we’re going back to the country club. Somebody sponsors us. They got a room at the country club. It’s probably got a nice fireplace. Uh, maybe it overlooks a golf course or tennis courts. Maybe it’s a tennis, could be a tennis club. It doesn’t have to be a golf club. I, I like tennis. So, uh, maybe so it overlooks the tennis courts. Uh, you know, there’s, there’s catering coming in. Are the are the builders and the sharers, they’re invited to the day and a half to bring their builders are the builders are coming to that. The builders are, yeah, our retreats are often at the, I don’t know, the, the park, you know, like the park, uh, parks can be great. Oh yeah, I’m doing the stereotype a little hot in the park, you know, but, but OK, here we’re. California, you know, or, or we’ve had, you know, hotel, hotel boardroom, conference room, all of that, but you do make a really good point which is it is way easier if possible, if possible, not always possible, but try to have that retreat somewhere that is not your office and really set the expectation that you are, you know, you’re out of. Office, you’re not having meetings, you’re and please order the food ahead of time. Oh my gosh. Um, I can’t tell you how many, it’s a few times early on where some, you know, they have the executive director. It’s like, OK, what is your vision for the future? And the executive director says, I’m sorry, I need to go figure out what we’re having for lunch. It’s like, no, no, you know. So, um, so yeah, so plan your future, not, you know, plan your lunch the day before. This is all about, uh, you know. Timing. If you’re at the park, maybe you could grill, you know, if there’s open grilling, maybe, maybe you could grill or, or, or have it delivered to the park. All right. Um, all right, so the sharers, well then how do the sharers share their, their contribution if they’re not invited to the. Lots of ways so it might be um sometimes um if we’re the you know we’re the consultants we will do interviews and focus groups you can also if you’re doing this project this process yourself it’s so easy to set up a Google form and just and put some questions in there and then. Uh, you, uh, would say, OK, we have, I don’t know, we have 10 staff people or 5 staff people, we’re each gonna do 4 or 5 interviews, we’re gonna put them in the Google form and then we’re gonna spend some time at the retreat sharing what we learned from those sharers. It’s time for Tony’s take 2. Thank you, Kate. All this week, nonprofit Radio is at the 2026 nonprofit Technology Conference. In Detroit, Michigan. I’ve never been to Detroit, so I’m looking forward to that very much. Should be some fun, have some, uh, some meals at a couple of nice places, hopefully in, uh, in Detroit. We are, of course, as we do every year at NTC we’re capturing lots of interviews for future shows, interviews with people who are leading sessions at NTC. These are smart technology people, helping you use technology better, more efficiently, more productively, choosing the right technology in some cases. All for, uh, you know, for efficiency, mission improvement. I love taking the show to NTC year after year, and this is our 12th year going to a nonprofit technology conference. Um, I love it because N10, the host of NTC is just very generous with space and working with us to get the interviews all set up in advance. Um, They’re just, you know, they’re, they’re just great partners. You know, it’s, it’s a pleasure to work with people who want to work with you, you know, who see your value, you see their value as well. It’s a pleasure. So that’s why 12 years running, and I’m sure we’ll go 13, uh, this time next year. I don’t know where next year’s is though. I think it’ll be West Coast cause they go. East Coast, Central, west, and then back to east. Last year was Baltimore, this year’s Detroit. So somewhere on the West Coast next year. Doesn’t matter. Nonprofit radio will be, will be with them there. So that’s where we are. Look forward to all those interviews coming up. In future shows with all these smart technology folks at the nonprofit technology conference. That is Tony’s take 2. Kate, Safe travels. Thank you. We’re recording in advance, of course. So thank you. Thank you. She’s, you know, here I say this week and then she blows it saying, you know, gives it away that, no, I think people know that, uh, the show must be recorded in advance because it gets published every Monday, so. We’re not, we’re not a live stream, so no, you didn’t, you didn’t blow it. You didn’t blow it. Thank you very much. We’ve got Beu butt loads more time. Here’s the rest of your five-step inclusive strategic plan with Renee Rubin Ross. Part of the kickoff, you know, you’re laying it out, what’s it gonna look like. Some folks have never done it before, or the, or, or our process may be very different than what they participated in at some other nonprofit or the same nonprofit 10 years ago. So how do we describe it? What, what is it gonna look like? Um, so a couple different things we, we will share, um, some of the meetings that we’re gonna be holding and talk about, um, some of the, um, some of the conversations we’re gonna hold as well that we are gonna be doing some visioning, uh, and that. Strategic planning really focuses on how is our organization adding value? What’s the most valuable thing that we’re doing right now, and how do we do more of that, uh, you know, yeah, I mean there’s a lot of different ways to say that, but I think that is the essence of it and um. That is, it’s not a, it’s a subjective question. It’s actually what do the people in the room who are doing the work feel is the most valuable part of the work. So there’s no pure answer to what’s most valuable. It’s actually what do we care most deeply about and that is what we’re gonna build a strategy around, you know, and, and obviously that’s informed by donors. That’s informed by um by what by what’s that data by data that’s informed by you know what we’re learning from yeah from our from working with clients from working in the community all of that but ultimately it isn’t it is what do those the people who are building the plan feel is most important and needed to focus on. OK, OK. Does, does, does this process include small groups? Like, can you, do, do we, do we ever send off a small group to think about this and a small group to think about that and then we come back together, or, or no, is it all, is it all a collective? No. No, um, so, so actually, although you just mentioned kickoff, so we’ve really actually talked about and we’ve already talked about almost all the stages of this because you kick off a lackluster that’s the problem. That’s the problem. It’s they’re all connected. They’re all connected. OK, well, they’re interconnected. OK, good. So we’ll, we’ll still go, we’ll still go through them, but, but, so, yeah, so can you have small groups working and then coming back and reporting and OK. So one of the things that we do at the retreat, which is a part of like planning and prioritization, which is those 3rd and 4th stages, is to start to reflect on what was learned in um in the discovery work and and that we usually do that in small groups. And we’ll have, you know, we’ll do a kind of, we’ll do a SWAT that is a kind of breakout, you know, like where you’ll say, OK, one group needs to talk about strengths, and one group needs to talk about challenges, one group can talk about opportunities and so you put that all on these, you know, you have people define, let’s define SWAT for folks. You have, you have a big jargon jail problem. Big, big, I mean, you’re still in jail from, uh, OCR or ROCR RACI ACI. So, all right, SWAT is, uh, you’re, you’re evaluating strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, something like that. It’s a little SWAT, isn’t it? Isn’t that, isn’t that SWAT? Yes, that is, yes, that is a SWAT. OT SW you don’t really talk about threats. Our process, but we, but we do talk about strengths. We do, so we sometimes call it a sorry, now you’re really going to send me to jail because we call it a sore where you have some, it’s more of a positive, uh, positive 10 really? Oh, that’s interesting. Wait, so I mean there are threats. I mean threats is not a bad word. There are, there are potential threats like that you know we look at weaknesses. Weaknesses or concerns, risks attrition, staff attrition, maybe staff attrition has been a problem. That’s a threat. All right, weakness. All right, well, or weaknesses or risks, weaknesses or risks or threats. All right, all right. So we got like sore road, whatever. All right, yeah, all right, I think it’s strengths, opportunities. Yeah, it’s funny. I don’t know what all these stand for. But it’s, it is a positive based type of, um, type of, you know, conversation where people come together and, and think about it though there are different tables, each table is working on one of these questions, so that is one way that we do. Um, we do breakout rooms and the, the, you know, breakout groups. The, the really fun part of that is at the table you might get somebody who joined the staff last year and then another person who has been on the staff for 10 years and, and so it’s a chance to not only talk about uh what are the strengths but also to hear from each other about how the organization has changed and some of what’s happened over time. So it’s really pretty cool. I’m, I’m curious about, uh, Renee Rubin Ross, uh, Triple R. Have, have you always been a, a planner, like as a child? Were you a, a planner, organizer type? Oh, that’s so interesting. I think that um what what I um what really interests me is, is frameworks and um thinking about and that’s actually a reason why it has been really fun to write my blog over the past, you know, about 5 years now and now make turn it into a book and think about, OK, uh, each time we do this, we get. I, we get better at explaining it and sharing content, sharing um like how do you go from um the vision to strategies and we have a step by step. So, um, so yeah, so creating, I’m very interested in creating that clarity for people around what’s going to happen next. And was that you in childhood, like your teen years? Were you, were you helping friends understand? What’s coming? Like, take it step by step. Were you that, that, uh, huh, that’s a good question. You’re that kind of kid. Um, I think that I do have a lot of curiosity and I like explaining things and so I was at one point interested in being a journalist, um, and so, yeah, so it’s like asking questions and creating clarity, uh, so. That people feel more comfortable and I think that is a lot about what this process is is being um showing how the process is gonna go so even what we talked about kick off so that people are feeling less of a sense of um concern you know if they’re if they’re new to strategic so you you like were you a comforter you comfort your. In childhood, did you comfort your friends, say, you know, here’s what’s coming, it’s gonna be OK. Are you a comforter? I think that, I think that, um, I, and I write about this in the book a little bit too, is, um, I personally as a kid did not feel so included. And so I think a lot about what is it, what does it mean to be included in something? What does it mean to feel like my perspective is valued and is honored and how for myself, how do I build spaces where people feel that way and for now it’s really around all different kinds of identity whether that’s, you know, me as a white person in in allyship with people of color or you know so around uh race disability. Uh, LGBT, all kinds of identity. How do we build spaces where everybody is honored and respected, and man, that is more needed than ever in, in these times. Yeah. Were you, were you like me, like the last person chosen for the, uh, pickup basketball team or something? I mean, are you kidding? I was hiding on the other side of the, oh, you, you weren’t even, you didn’t want, you didn’t want to play. Alright, I, I, I was definitely, I was definitely geeky, but I could see things that other people, you know, it was like very insightful, and I think like that, like what, what did you see that other kids didn’t see? Um, I guess, you know, power dynamics, who, who is talking, who’s not talking, um, how are people being treated, um, even, but also what, um, what’s the step to find a solution to something, but so you need to find that solution, but you also need the influence, right? to implement, yeah, I’ve got the solution, but I’m not, I’m not one of the cool kids. So people, so people don’t listen to me. All right, we’re very simpatico. I’m mean, like I was a backstage, I was a backstage geek, you know, uh, lighting, audio, worked the, worked the backstage console, cameras, things like that, AVA audio visual, which was, uh, disparagingly in, in, no, I was in high school from 80. What, 74, 76 to 80. Yeah. So, right, 76 to 80. So, I was in AVA, the audiovisual AIDS, but, you know, to, to, uh, to, uh, to make fun of, we, we were, to make fun of us, we were, we were called gay VA, you know, because it was in, in the, in the early 80s, you know, oh, you’re gay, you’re gay, you know, of course. You gotta, you gotta recognize the time, the time that I’m explaining this. So, you know, I was the backstage. So, so you’re saying, you know, you were like, uh, you were, you were not in the, in the, in the cool click either. Like, not like smoking in the girls’ room. That wasn’t you. Um, no. No, and I wasn’t even, I was too shy to even, you know, be the, be one of the theater kids as well, you know. Well, yeah, I was in theater, but I was, I was behind the stage. I was backstage, right? I was, I was too shy to even do that, you know, but I have, I mean, I have a lot of empathy, and I really think about in these times, how to design and so that everybody has a voice, and that is in a very, you know, that’s again, we, we use technology to part. Participation is a structured way of designing conversation so that we truly if we’re sitting in a large group there’s ways where you sometimes you, you break it down and people can talk in their small groups sometimes you make sure that you, you can talk to everybody in the room that has a, you know, way of weighing in and um people feel that their voices matter and to me that matters and that’s interesting. See that came from you feeling voiceless. Uh, as, and unincluded as a child. So it’s, it’s wonderful that you’re, you’re developing systems and processes that are inclusive. I mean, inclusive is the first word of your book. Right, and I think, right, and I think, I think you know that’s, that’s very common, right? People say they, they’re finding healing in something that was hard for them. And so that’s a real spot of, wow, I want to make, I want to build a different kind of world going forward. Yeah. How about step two discovery, even though, we’ve blended them all together because I keep asking you questions that make you digress, but I’m curious about, I’m curious about these things. How about discovery? What is that? What’s that phase? Yeah, it’s really so as we talked about a little already, that is those those interviews and um and focus groups, um, and sometimes the survey, um, it’s really and there’s a lot of different reasons for doing this. I think like that’s. Something that is important to be clear about is that um you, you get a lot of information, it’s not always actionable, right? And, and that is part of the process and you, you, you need to again, just be transparent about that. Uh sometimes. We’ve had the experience of doing some amazing focus groups where people were thrilled with the organization. We’ve also had some really hard ones where people were not thrilled with the organization. And in either case, you just say, OK, we’re going to be, we’re sharing this back anonymously. We are gonna take this under consideration. Not everything is actionable, um, and that’s kind of what you have to, what you have to do if, uh, if the leadership is, you know, is doing a good job, they will, uh, work on some of the hard stuff that comes up, but it might, they might be working on it already and it also might take some time, you know. OK, and that, that leads to step 3 which is prioritization. Mhm mhm. can’t be everything can’t be the first the first priority of course. Yeah, and I think this question, so this idea in um in top facilitation we do the practical vision there’s different kinds of visioning. One is like what would we need to, what would the world need to look like in order for us to close down, you know, and you sometimes hear these we want a world where every person has enough water. You know, has food to eat and da da that’s great. That’s very inspiring. The problem is like, wait, OK, how do we get from here to that? So the practical vision is much more, um, just what’s going to happen in the next 3, what are we going to do as a result of our actions and, you know, what do we want to see in place as a result of our actions and it’s, it’s powerful. It’s powerful. And what do we want to see in place like over the next 3 years? Correct. What do we want to see in place over the next 3 years? Sometimes 5, and sometimes we will go through the whole thing and then people will say, well, this is really inspiring, and we said 3 years, but it’s actually more like 10, you know, and that’s OK. I mean, but at least you kind of know where you’re going and you know. So the kinds of things that come out, it would be like um more funding sources, um, um, serving, you know, another serving additional clients in X area, um, a very satisfied staff with higher salaries and different kinds of things. Those are some like just on one hand I mean there’s there’s many different things that come out of this but um basically that the organization is um has more sustainability and stability and that people feel good about working there and feel good about the work. What about the funding of the strategic plan? Should that shouldn’t that be a part of the strategic plan? How are we going to fund the, the increased salaries, the additional, the additional positions? Shouldn’t, shouldn’t fundraising, funding it, just how we’re gonna pay, how are we gonna pay for the strategic plan? Shouldn’t that be a part of the strategic plan? Yes, and you just reminded me, um, that, um, so a couple things. So first of all, when we do this work, one of the things we do in discovery is we do a fiscal review, and that is. Looking at the past 3 years, um, what are the, what are the budget trends and it’s reflective, like a small small group conversation with often with like the board, treasurer and CFO, executive director, we create a report that we then talk about at the retreat. So, um, so that planning is like the foundation of planning is understanding the finances of the organization. Uh, you’re not understanding every line item, but you know what is the general trend for this organization? OK, so that’s one thing and then yes, we, there’s, there always needs to be um part of the plan that is that focuses on, uh, on funding when that doesn’t. Occasionally that won’t come up and I will say, OK, as a good, you know, consultant, I feel my responsibility is to tell you that you need to make sure that this plan includes some, some goals around funding just to, to be, this is not just program, this is how exactly what you said, Tony, how are we going to fund, um, the, the work that we want to do otherwise implementation is gonna fall flat if we don’t have the money to fund the plan. Then what’s the point of having the plan because we can’t execute it because it requires more money than we can, than we have a plan to raise. All right, I feel like, all right, well, we’re gonna, we’re gonna persevere with the 12345, even though I brought you in all kinds of different directions. Um, I think we’ve been more like 5132, you know, that’s OK, but that’s why it’s a spiral because each, it’s an iterative process. I saw it is, it is a spiral. Yes, it is a spiral, um, so planning, planning is your 4th, planning is your 4th step. Is there anything that we haven’t said about plan? I mean, this is, is this the creation of the plan. Um, that is where you start to get into your goals. Is this a day and a half retreat basically. Um, I would say, yeah, the retreat is, is about, is focuses on prioritization and planning, OK? And, and, and then the planning, which is planning is really, um, starting to work on those goals. That it continues through, um, that continues after the retreat as well because you usually draft your goals in the in the retreat, but like a lot of things you they may need some work, um, some additional work. Do you drill down to, uh, either OKRs. Which is objectives and key results or KPIs. Notice how I define everything, key performance indicators. Do you drill down to OKRs or KPIs, sometimes not, not at the retreat, but yes, we do have, we have worked with organizations that that’s the way they work and that’s what they want, in other words, I think dashboards are, I think. OK, so what overall you need a system that you are going to implement. Don’t make it too complicated. If you have a 20, if you have a 50 page document that you are not gonna, that’s just gonna sit on your shelf, it’s not the right system, OK. However, if you have a dashboard that where you can, um, easily say. Uh, yellow, green, or red, and you know what that means for each goal, that’s great. That is, you know, then you can see how you’re doing on your plan and what you need to work on next. So it’s, it’s really what is the. Culture of your organization, what kinds of things do you track? Do you need to strengthen your systems that may be something that comes out of the plan, right? And, and what’s gonna be useful for you that isn’t gonna feel so bur you plural, that isn’t gonna feel so burdensome. Yeah, I mean, I don’t know. Do you have a thought about OKRs and KPIs and, and all of that? I have, I have clients who have worked with both. I, I’m agnostic between OKRs and KPIs. I mean, I, I go along with whatever the, whatever the client wants to implement or whatever, you know, because I’m, I’m a narrow niche. I’m just doing planned giving fundraising in, in most cases. In most cases, that’s it. So, you know, I’m happy to contribute OKRs and KPIs if, or, or I should say or instead of and. If that’s what the system they work in, then I’ll be happy to contribute. Yeah, I don’t, uh, it, I mean, uh. Yeah, I, I can’t say that I have a choice. I mean, not that, not that I don’t have a choice in what they do. I don’t, I can’t make a choice between the two. I don’t see one being better than the other. My estimation, my limited role in participating in these with clients. Yeah, and I think it sounds like you have a similar approach which is all right, how do we build on in, you know, as a consultant, how do I build on what you already have and make, you know, what we’ve created make sense to in terms of the, the way your system is set up. So yeah, I just want, you know what, I just want to get out and start talking to folks about planned gifts for the, for the, for the for the organization. That’s whatever we could do to get start conversations. And, and reduce the, reduce the lead time and the lead burden, the better. So whatever I need to contribute to, yeah, I’m, I’m, uh, well, I’m either building on what they have. It’s usually very little because I’m usually inaugurating a planned giving program. So I’m helping them start from scratch. We’re identifying top prospects and what the plan is gonna be for each of those, and then the tier two prospects and what the plan is for that group. So, uh, there’s usually very little to build on. OK. In, in their planned giving. All right. OK. That brings us to our 5th step, implementation, which we covered in the 1st step. Is there anything more you want to say about how this needs to be a living document or maybe you just wanna re-emphasize that it does? Have to be, yeah, yeah, yeah, I think that, um, I, that’s great. I do want to emphasize that that it does need to be a living and I think that the, the idea that um This is gonna, you know, I think going back to what I said before, which is like knowing at the beginning that um that you’re not going to go to the place where all problems are solved, right? That there will be that new questions will come up. On the other hand, um, the positive of this is you you may have a lot more focus in your work and just going back to Um, SOS Meals on Wheels, when I was finishing the book, I reached out to them again to say how, you know, it’s been a few years, how did things go, and the executive director shared, well, what happened was that he started to get in this through doing this process, he started to think more about strategic opportunities and so in 2024 he had someone who came to him and was applying for a different. Different role and ended up being the director of advocacy and was really really excited about that and then with everything that happened in 2025 this person became invaluable in uh in make in fun making sure that funding sources were um were secured or were saved and you know he said that some of the some of what happened with this role was. Actually just preventing it wasn’t getting new funding it was just preventing funding from being lost but that all that never would have happened if he hadn’t been thinking about what is gonna happen next and how can I start to look ahead versus being so reactive um so that so there’s some shifting in thinking that happens just by going through the process. Triple R. Renee Rubin Ross. That’s her. That’s her. You’ll find her company at the Ross Collective.com. Connect with Renee on LinkedIn. Renee, thank you very much for sharing. It was perfect. Great, great explanation so much. This is so fun to talk about. I, I can talk about it forever. Unfortunately, we only have 49 minutes, but, uh, but no, I love, no, but your enthusiasm and the way your eyes light up sometimes when you, your eyes get big when you’re making some bold points like, yeah, that’s right. I love it. I love it. Love it. No, your, your, your passion for the subject comes out. It’s, it’s a pleasure. Thank, thank you. All right. Next week, sell your nonprofit. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you, find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martinetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.
Kimberly O’Donnell delivers strategies and tactics for your corporate social responsibility fundraising. She advises you to build relationships and avoid transactions; lead with mission and your compelling story; include volunteering; tap your community to avoid cold outreach; leverage your own data; and, a lot more. Kimberly is with Bonterra.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer with biliousness if you upset my stomach and gave me a headache because you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, with what’s up this week. Hey Tony, here’s what’s up. Savvy CSR seeking. Kimberly O’Donnell delivers strategies and tactics for your corporate social responsibility fundraising. She advises you to build relationships and avoid transactions. Lead with mission and your compelling story. Include volunteering, tap your community to avoid cold outreach, leverage your own data, and a lot more. Kimberly is with Bon Terra. On Tony’s take 2. We lost a sponsor over a show. Here is savvy CSR seeking. It’s my pleasure to welcome to nonprofit radio, the chief fundraising officer at Bonterra, Kimberly O’Donnell. She leads the coaching and consulting program at Bonterra, working with nonprofits and major corporations to strengthen fundraising, engagement, and corporate social responsibility. She taught nonprofit leadership for over a decade at Georgetown and George Mason Universities. You’ll find the company at Bonterraech.com. And you’ll find Kimberly on LinkedIn. Welcome to Nonprofit Radio, Kimberly O’Donnell. Thank you. It’s great to be here. My pleasure. You see, I donned my Bonterra gear. I got my hat on. I love it. I love it. It looks good on you. I hope that’s the current, that’s still a current logo, isn’t it? Yeah, yeah, it works great. I got this. I got this a couple of years ago at the, uh, nonprofit technology conference. Ah, in 10, OK. I was trying to figure out where that hat came from. It came from, yep, came from that conference. Uh, is Bonterra going this year into Detroit? Do you know? Great question. I, I believe. So, um, we do a lot of conferences. I don’t go to that one, but often you’ll see me at a lot of different, um, shows. I’ll be at AFP Icon this year, and, uh, the peer to peer forum is coming up in a few weeks, and, um, Points of Light, uh, Foundations, uh, conference later this year, the bridge conference. Anyways, um. Yeah, uh, but N10 is a, is a great conference, uh, for, uh, nonprofit folk to go to, to really learn a lot about, uh, the evolving tech that’s out there and the new resources that are available to them. Yeah, it is a fantastic conference, and it’s not only for technologists by any means. It’s for everybody using tech for their social good mission. Uh, yeah, I’ve brought the podcast there. This, I think this is gonna be the 12th year, 12th or 13th year in a row. Uh, where we, we capture lots of interviews over the 2.5 days of the conference and as I said this year in Detroit, so I bet Bonterra will be there. I’d be surprised if you’re not there. I, I, I believe so. I, you are right. So let’s talk about corporate social responsibility CSR. You have lots of solid advice, good advice, savvy advice about. Uh, making your pitch, you know, thinking through how to pitch. We’re gonna talk about all this. What, uh, and then how to make the pitch and to whom and what you offer. Start us off with a kind of a high-level, high level overview of like the value and what maybe what you see some nonprofits not doing so well that we could, we could improve upon for our uh nonprofit radio listeners. Yeah, sure. Um, well, I would say the landscape is changing, right? Like as we step into this, let’s level set about what is going on in the sector today related to CSR and the, the. Relationships that we have with our um corporate partners, uh, last year we saw big shifts in federal funding, um, and that caused a lot of organizations who were affected by those cuts to go, wait a minute, where can I get other resources, right? Like how do we, how do we fill this bucket and by the way, corporations. Why don’t you step up and give more? Many of those corporations, some did, right, like, but many also went through a period of pause, where they began to evaluate what their core pillars were, because in addition to all that was happening with the federal funding changes, they were also taking um some, some, uh, strategic, you know, evaluations of their DEIB. Programs, they’re giving pillars, all of that. And so what happened last year was, there was a period where, where nonprofits were going, hey, we need to go and go after more corporate funding. And the funders were kind of looking internally going, wait, I need to reset our strategic pillars and just make sure that we are in align so that we can support as many organizations as we can more fully and thoughtfully. Um, so that happened in the first half of the year, um, really going into Q3, and then what we’ve since seen is that many corporate partners are going, OK, um, we, we know who we, we are and, and what we stand for. But with the new one big beautiful bill, the new tax law that went into effect in January, um, we are, we are not sure yet what our overall giving might look like moving forward, because there are different benefits now in with this, uh, tax law. So, I say that as, you know, to just kind of give Get us started in thinking about why, um, it is time to think strategically, uh, as a nonprofit about your corporate partnerships, and what things you could be doing in this year, um, to really reestablish those relationships and go and find new ones that can potentially be, uh, mutually beneficial. So how do we start our, I guess, our local analysis, like, you know, within our nonprofit? What, how do we think through what we bring? Because we do bring, you know, you, we’re not, we’re not asking like from a position of weakness. We have things that, that corporations want. How do we, how do we think through what, you know, what, what we bring as, as we’re, as we’re starting to, I guess, assemble our pitch? Um, so, great question. And the first thing to do is really think about what your stories look and sound like, and how they might appeal to your corporate partners. And also maybe do an audit of your corporate partners, who they are, where they’re located, why they are partnering with you. Um, it could be that they’re local to your community. It could be that They’re tied in some way to your mission, right? But really kind of dive in and assess who they are, what size organization are you working, you know, are you working with mostly small organi, you know, companies, um, or local branches of banks, for example, or your local, you know, Target or Walmart, right? Um, and if that is the case, then. Determine, like, is this, is this the best grouping for us? Um, or if you’re working with much larger organizations, why is that? And, and what are you doing? Um, so that kind of gives you a sense of what you have, and then begin to think about what might be, um, who you, who you might target moving forward. And so as you think about those things, then you also can begin to think about how to prioritize your mission through storytelling. How you can communicate that why, um, to a corporate funder for why they would be involved with your organization. And you always want these organizations to be a good fit. It’s not like it, it is a mutually beneficial relationship. And, um, and you want it to feel good, um, and not be such a stretch. So like that’s, that’s the first thing, right? It’s kind of going, all right, who, who do we have and what organizations might we want to um engage moving forward. If we’re looking at a, uh, so I sort of see two buckets. So if we’re, we’re looking at a, a local, you mentioned, you know, Target or Walmart, and there’s that versus local businesses. Might be a dry cleaner, it might be an auto car dealership, might be a laundromat, restaurants, but, so let’s, but what’s that banks might be, might be a local, local bank in the, in the county or the state, right? Not a, not a national bank. Um, so, looking at that first cohort, um, does the local Target or Walmart or Best Buy, you know, do they have discretion or, or are they gonna refer us to the, Corporate headquarters or or is it a mix? Yeah, it’s, it’s typically a mix for some of those, you know, big box retailers and, and, uh, grocery stores and things like that. Um, as a corporate entity, they likely have a foundation, they likely have, um, a CSR office that’s focused on their overall, um, giving strategy, um, and their employee volunteer programs, all of that. But they often will have some discretionary funds that they can, uh, use. To support local organizations. They also, you know, some of those organizations also allow, uh, charities to come and, um, you know, have a table in front of the, the store, um, or they can come and speak to their employees about their mission. And so, um, there are different ways that a big box retailer or national, international company might be able to support, uh, a smaller local organization. OK. And then on the local business side, I mean, I guess you, you have the advantage that you, you’re not gonna be put off, uh, to, to a, a, a larger office somewhere. You know, if you’re in the restaurant or the local bank, you’re, you’re, you’re talking to the decision-maker, but, you know, the dollars may not be as, as great as, uh, as great as a, you know, a national retailer or something. Yes, yes. And you know, you can establish a lot of those relationships by going to the entity, um, and, and sharing with them, you know, how you are connected. You could set up meetings. But you could also meet great contacts through your chamber of commerce, through your Rotary Club, right? Like different community groups, um, are also wonderful places to start to establish those relationships. You mentioned employee volunteering. I wanna, uh, pull on that thread a little bit, because that’s something that a lot of companies are interested in, and that, that could include local, that could include local businesses, um, as well as national or international brands, right? The, a lot of companies like employee volunteering, and even some of them will even compensate. The, the, the employee for the time that they spend. That’s right. That’s right. So they have a volunteer paid hours, right, um, and what they call VTO, volunteer time off, and they encourage their employees to track those in their system, um, our, so Bonterra’s software, uh, one of our, uh, software products is for just that, um, for tracking volunteer hours, for, for giving grants, um. It’s called cyber grants. And, uh, so we are very well, uh, you know, well skilled, well schooled in, in corporate giving and volunteerism. What we’re seeing is that volunteerism is on the rise. There is a, um, there is a big push within companies for their employees to volunteer because, um, it just. Feels good, right? Like, it’s great for the business, it’s great for the employees. Employees who volunteer typically have a higher, um, perception of their company. They have higher satisfaction, um, scores, uh, when, when they are surveyed, um, they feel more connected to the, the company and their community, um, and they’re really proud of the work that, that their company does. And so, Um, so it is great if you are a, uh, a charity to begin to think about how you might engage these companies of all sizes in volunteer activities. Um, and some of the things that are popular right now are, um, really around purpose-driven things. Um, micro volunteering, uh, I think is a really interesting concept, um, things that, um, uh, employees or Or, you know, employee volunteers can do in a very short period of time, um, where they could also be learning about your mission, um, and also helping you in some way, potentially virtually if you have some virtual volunteer opportunities, that is great because then that will appeal to larger, um, companies that may not have a physical footprint in your community, um, but they still are really aligned with your mission. Uh, for example, I’ve seen, um, Uh, those micro volunteer projects evolve around, um, having, uh, providing an overview of like the coral reef, uh, degradation and, and then having employees go and, you know, review the coral reef and spot different areas where there are, um, so where you say micro volunteering, is that like, like an hour at a time or something? Is that what you mean? as little as 15 minutes 15. to 30 minutes. Yeah, yeah, really short periods of time. Um, another example is, a homeless organization actually has, uh, put materials to create, um, straw mats in, um, these bank branches, and employees could go when they were taking their 15 minute break, their lunch break, they could go back and they could work on weaving this, um, mat. Uh, and it might take several months, and, but the whole office is doing this during their, their break time. And so they are collectively making something together, and they are collectively helping, um, to address homelessness and, uh, and just care for others, right? Like, so that is a feel good thing. They’re doing it on their own time. It is in the office. Um, there are other, I’ve seen like, uh, DI. What they call them DIY volunteer kits, where, um, uh, there’s a hospice organization. They don’t provide fresh flowers to new hospice hospice patients, but they do have, um, they do, uh, through origami make origami flowers. And so they will train the employees on how to make these flowers, and they’ll make them in their own time. And so those are, those are little micro volunteering opportunities. And what you would call DIY opportunities. OK, those are brilliant. Um, yeah, so, all right, so we need to think through how we could Create volunteer opportunities, more, more traditional, like, come on, come on, come to our office or our campus, spend a half a day and You know, I don’t know, volunteer with the animals, uh, walk the animals, uh, or, or feeding, or I’ve heard of, you know, assembling backpacks, like for students, things like that, or student kit or kids that are going abroad to, to our armed forces, you know, whatever, whatever it might be. But as well as the micro. Which sound, you know, that, that has to be done. I mean if we’re talking about 15 or 30 minutes, that’s, that’s an in-office. You’re not coming to the office to do it, you’ll, you’ll spend all the time just going back and forth between offices. But, but, but off-site, but that, all right, you’re opening, you’re opening, and they’ll also, I have another example that I thought was really interesting. They, um, this is for children. I’m, I’m trying to think of who it’s for, but basically they had like coloring. Pages where employees could color or do an art project that would be sent to an individual or a letter writing, right? Like all those things that can be done that appeal to remote employees, um, but still help them feel engaged. Um, and, uh, and there’s just, uh, another thing to consider is, with this one big beautiful bill that’s out, um, so, what it, what it says is that, um, corporations. Uh, would need to donate, uh, 1% of their revenue to receive a tax deduction. Yeah, there’s a new floor this year, a floor in charitable giving for corporations. And so, this could be very challenging for a lot of companies who are very generous, but maybe didn’t hit that 1% floor. And so, what we may see over the next few years is what is called bunching. Um, they may, uh, give in 1 year and then pause for two years, and then give again large grants, right? Like that would equal 3 years of their giving, but They’re gonna give it in one year to get that tax advantage. Um, now, there are other ways that they may, um, be able to support charity, and that is through corporate sponsorships, right? Like, so I could see there being more corporate sponsorships available than there were before. And then also workforce development dollars. And so these are coming from the corporation as opposed to maybe. The, the corporate foundation, um, workforce development dollars could be really helpful for, and, and could be leveraged along with the volunteer, um, a volunteer angle, because, uh, you, as an organization could go in and provide some sort of training to that company and to the employees, um, that could be developing them and then they could do a project with you. An example is. Um, grant making. So there is a, uh, I think they, they had a charity come in and talk about, uh, the impact of grants and grant making. Um, and then the employees were schooled on how you make decisions around grant making, and then they reviewed applications from students. Who had applied for, for grants. So it’s a really neat connection, right? Like where you’re, you’re educating their workforce on something that is tied to the sector and also can be professional development for them longer term, um, around grant making and, and overall charitable giving and, and some of the hard decisions that, that occur. You said something interesting about, you know, sponsorships, because if the company is doing sponsoring with you, sponsorship with you. They could, they could make that part of their marketing budget and not allocate it as a charitable gift, so they don’t have to reach the 1% of whatever it is, gross revenue, whatever the calculate, whatever the, whatever the accounting item is that you have to exceed a 1% of. But they, if they make it a marketing activity, then they don’t have to reach that 1% threshold for it to be a deductible expense. Is that right? Bingo. That’s exactly it. And that’s what I mean as well with the workforce development dollars. So sponsor, so pitch it as a sponsorship, not as a charitable gift, right, right, um, or as a training, um, opportunity or training, or you said I know workforce development, yeah, yeah, so with both of them, um, and it’s, I think it’s interesting because, you know, during COVID, after COVID. I have also long said, boy, are events expensive. And so, you know, they take a lot of time and energy. It’s big labor on staff. Um, and so, when COVID hit, we wondered if there would be fewer live events and big events and the galas and all of those things and the golf. Golf tournaments. And, um, and so now it’ll be interesting to see like with this avenue for corporate giving, if we, if we start to see some more, you know, an uptick in, in some of these larger events for organizations again. And, and sponsoring, right, right. Um, what do you think? Oh, I, I, I think the, I think the shift from calling it charitable giving to training or workforce development or sponsorship, yeah, I, I, I mean, I, I, to me, that just makes like accounting sense and, uh, and tax sense and I don’t know, it’s, they’re, they’re so closely aligned. There’s a, there’s a very fine line between charitable giving and, and sponsoring slash marketing. So, yeah, I, I mean, I think we’ll just see it reallocated, but, but from the nonprofit perspective, it’s in terms of your pitch, you wanna be, you wanna be savvy. You wanna let folks know that, you know that they are now facing a 1% floor on their, uh, uh, on their charitable giving, only above which is deductible, but you come in with, uh, a, a sponsorship idea or a workforce development idea. There’s also a mission alignment. You, you alluded to this, but I’m like, I’m pulling on some threads that you, uh, that you mentioned earlier. You know, you wanna make sure that Your story, I mean, your, your mission aligns with the values of the company, right, overall. Oh, 100%. I mean that’s what’s so important, right? Um, you wanna have good matches. You want this to feel good on both sides. And, um, and often many organizations, um, many companies will, um, Support you, become more engaged with you if it does feel like it’s aligned on both sides. So, I think that’s, that’s really important. I think, you know, as I said, start by doing an analysis of, of who’s giving and why, who your targets might be. And then begin to think about how you can target them, uh, or these new companies and begin to develop relationships. And that’s what this is about. Companies want to have relationships with these nonprofits, and they want it to feel personal for both the company and for their employees. So that’s an important piece. And a relationship is a two-way street, Tony. So that’s the other thing is, um, if you haven’t yet, please reach out to your. Corporate partners and ask them how they’re doing, you know, you can note, hey, there’s been some big shifts now with the, with the new tax law. How is that affecting your giving strategy? That is a very fair question to ask these corporate partners because they’ve been thinking about it, um, or, you know, with things that are happening right now, um, with inflation and, and with the economy in general, and, you know, overall impact of, of many societal things, what’s going on within your company? What are some of the things that you’re concerned about? Um, is there anything that we could be doing on our side to better support you? Uh, and then if they say to you, um, you know, we may need to scale down some of our giving, um, it will impact you, or we don’t know if it’s gonna impact you. Another thing that you can do is you can also ask them if they might make some introductions to other, other companies and other colleagues that they have that might also align. With your organization. I’ve heard from CSR leaders who did a lot of that last year. They said, look, we had to cut down and really hone in on our, on our pillars, um, and as we did that, we invited some of these, you know, uh, groups to come and, and, um, come to conferences where they could network or other networking events or we made personal introductions for them. Um, so there are many, uh. Companies and CSR folks who are doing that, and all that takes us an ask, right? Like, uh, people get so nervous about like, oh, asking anything of their corporate partner, um, for fear of losing any kind of funding, but, but that’s what this is about. This is a relationship, and there is nothing, you know, there’s no harm in asking for other ways that they might, um, support your organization and help, uh, others learn about your organization. In the vein of a relationship, you know, what about making multi-year asks? Like, you know, instead of, instead of us coming to you once a year or these one-off things where, I don’t know, support the gala or let’s, you know, let’s have a, a, a, a, a grant that, that has some volunteering and some sponsorship, you know, mix. How about pitching like a three-year, a 3-year relationship or maybe even a five-year relationship? Is that, Is that feasible, or I, I would say it’s very feasible, and I think a 3-year relationship is a great place to start, you know, 2-year, um, and, uh, and see what they think. Like, it’s also a great way to begin to get creative in how these, um, companies may support you and how you can secure, um, more funding longer term that’s sustainable for your organization. And that just feels more like a partnership than a transaction. You know, the, the year after year thing, OK, you made a pitch, we’ll give you the $200,000. OK, next year, you made a pitch, you know, it, it’s, it just, it doesn’t feel like a relationship. It feels like a series of annual transactions. Yeah, yeah, well, and, and similarly around grant applications nowadays too, right? Like you have that. And so how do you make these grant applications feel personal as well? So Bonterra has, um, a, uh, has, has built and embedded AI into a lot of our tools and, um, and we the first social good um company to actually have an agentic AI platform for nonprofits. And, um, and we have a tool called grant Match AI where they can go in, a nonprofit could go in and search for grants, and then there are match criteria, and you can see why you match to these different, um, grant opportunities. And how strong of a match it is, could be by geography or by mission or a number of things. And then what’s so cool about it is that this application, then you could use AI to start the application, and it will pull in your mission and help answer some of those questions. But what’s really important is, is that there is that what we call the human in the loop, right? The human, and I heard it last week. From an AWS colleague who was calling it human at the helm, you need to have these applications feel personal, have the data in it that really shows the impact that your organization is making, so that the grant reviewers will be able to see and feel your organization and what you really are doing and achieving. It’s time for Tony’s take 2. Thank you, Kate. You may recall a few weeks ago, I made mention of a potential sponsor, looked very promising. That, uh, that potential sponsor is not gonna join us. And that’s because they object to. One of our shows, uh, that was, uh, the Decolonizing Wealth show, which I replayed in December. I’ve replayed it a few times. Uh, the original recording was 2018. I’ve replayed it, I believe, 3 times since then. And it was deemed by this potential sponsor company to be too political. They didn’t like it, uh. I stand by it. I think it’s a great show. It’s why I’ve replayed it several times. Uh, Edgar Villanueva is the author of the book, Decolonizing Wealth, and that was, as I said, also the name of the show. And, um, yeah, he talks about the intense concentration of wealth in the United States and the impact of that on philanthropy. And he talked about plans, you know, for overcoming that. Uh, uh, that concentration and essentially doing what the book says, decolonizing wealth, uh, deeply rooted, you may recall in, um, Native American Thinking, and wisdom because he’s himself is a Native American. He’s a member of the Lumbe tribe. So for that company, that show was too political and they, uh, withdrew their interest in becoming sponsors. They had never, they hadn’t joined, they hadn’t signed up, uh, but they’re no longer a prospect. With that, I would say if. Your company feels that nonprofit radio is something valuable for the nonprofit community and you’d be proud to have your company, your brand affiliated with the show. Let me know, because we have a sponsorship opening. That is Tony’s take 2. Kate There are other donor fish in the sea. There always are. That’s absolutely right. That’s true for individuals, that’s true for companies. Absolutely true. You’re right. We’ve got Bou butt loads more time. Here’s the rest of Savvy CSR Seeking with Kimberly O’Donnell. Also in the vein of, uh, relationships, your advice is to look within, as we, as we think about who to, who, which businesses to approach, you know, you, you think about who are the past sponsors been, what, what contacts might you have within your organization. Yeah, yeah, that’s a great starting point, right? Um, looking at, looking at your past corporate, uh, sponsors, um, looking at the employees who have volunteered with your organization, um, looking at, uh, actually one of the things that, that you could do is, um, on newsletter forms or on any kind of form that you have, you could ask, you know, uh, are you open to sharing your, you know, Your profession or your company, um, we are always looking for matched gifts, you know, does your company have a matched gift program? They can just check the box, yes or no, right? Like, but if we don’t ask, we don’t know. And, and often it’s, it’s reliant on the employee coming forward and saying, I have a matched gift program. I’m going to give to you, and I’m also going to apply for this match. But we, as a nonprofit also need to be asking that question and having. That, um, socialized in many places. Um, you could on your giving page have something that, that states, you know, that, that you, um, you know, you ask about match gift programs, and then make sure that your software is able to, um, effectively link that. Uh, I used to work for a nonprofit where we didn’t do a great job. My software was, was terrible, um, and it. And it, it didn’t match those soft credits easily. And I can remember one of our employees coming to me and saying, hey, my husband has been giving these match gifts, and they’re not connecting to me and, and my relationship with this company. I’m not getting credit for it whenever we have the donor rolls. And it was really because things were not matched well internally. So, um, that’s something that I know that we at Fonterra having fundraising, um, software. We, we. They’re very careful to be able to, to have those soft credit matches. What’s your own background? Let’s talk about, uh, Kimberly O’Donnell for a few minutes. What you, you, uh, you were executive director of a nonprofit? I was of a volunteer center back in the day. I was a chief philanthropy officer of a, um, of a foundation. It was a, a, um, a, um, medical foundation tied to a medical association. Um, so I was, that was the American, American Psychiatric Association, wasn’t it? American, um, yeah, Psychiatric Association Foundation, yes, um, so psychiatrists, um, and, uh, that’s OK, you know, you can, we can shout them out. So psychiatry is, that’s a bona fide medical practice. It is, uh, and they do amazing, amazing work, um, and much needed in this day and age, right, um. So, uh, yes, I also worked for, um, a, uh, what is called good 360 now, um, and so that is product philanthropy. So the giving programs for very large companies like a, um, Adele, uh, Sara Lee, Hayneshoser, Duracell, they would all leverage good 360 to um manage the logistics of their corporate, um, in-kind giving. Uh, so, so, yeah, you know, getting those, you know, having a, a program where we were able to vet those who were going to get, you know, laptops and things like that, or, or personal good items. And so, uh, and there I oversaw the membership of the nonprofit, um. Groups that receive the in-kind gifts. So what I’ve been able to do over the years is really have a, a sense of, um, giving a volunteerism, um, and giving it all different levels. And then I, uh, this, I’ve been at 3 nonprofit tech companies. Um, the first being, uh, um, prospects research, uh, with Wealth Engine, which is now part of Ultrata. Um, and so I saw the power of, um, LLMs and, you know, where technology could go many years ago, you know, like, in 2000, and, and just have been amazed and fascinated by where it’s taking us today. I mean, it can do so much good for our social goods sector, and I, I can’t wait to see what more we can harness with AI. It can. I, I have my own skepticisms and concerns about. Giving away our creativity. Uh, you know, uh, when, when, when I, I, I don’t, I don’t like to see us. Use the large language models for like a first draft of something. I know that’s maybe contrary to what you’re thinking, but to me that’s the most creative. Thing, uh, that’s not a very good word. That, that’s, that’s some of the, that’s some of the most creative work that a human can do is looking at a blank page and, and creating it. Uh, so when we, when we see that creative work, To the, to the large language models and then we become Basically a copy editor. You know, I, I, I have concerns about that and it’s not only writing, but also music and art. And so I have my, I have my concerns, you know, I have my, like, Skepticism, my, my concerns, you know, I, I, uh, yeah, you know, I don’t, I don’t want us to become less creative creatures. I agree with you. I mean, and I think that’s really important to recognize is, is how do you keep the creativity in there? And where, where is that special sauce? I would say, I find that, that first draft, um, that’s created through agentic AI where, where you are already training it with your voice and, and your mission and all of that is built in there. So you’re, you’re helping it become somewhat like you, um, is, is. Very helpful, particularly for smaller organizations where they may not have the, the experience, um, like I do from years of fundraising to know where to start with that draft, right? Like, if you have never been a fundraiser, and yet you have to write an appeal letter, it can be really hard to know what to put in that to start. Um, and it could take a lot of time. And so that’s where if you have a Trained agent who, who understands your voice, right? Like who gets your organization and can start with that, then you can then go in and go, all right, well, I now know how to set this up to actually be successful in asking for contributions. And so now let me put in some of this, the feeling that the storytelling, that, that experience that I want, I want people to, to feel and yeah, I, I, I would say then I would. I, uh, it’s a fair point. I, I, I would be concerned then about what the model was trained on, you know, cause you, you made, you made, you were very clear. You made the point, you know, it’s in your tone. It was trained on, but, you know, is it trained on your, your content and your voice, or is it, you know, a, a, a, a generic like chat GPT, uh, that, that you haven’t given your individual content to. So it’s, you know, it loses, it doesn’t have your voice, it doesn’t know your voice, um, so, all right, and that, and that is the, that’s the big fear that we had, and it was actually why Bonterra went so quickly into developing our. Or um what we call Bonterra Q and that comes after James Bond, right? Like Q is behind the scenes, helping out, helping to God, right? QUE is what we call it. And that was trained on. Decades of experience, uh, we actually, I oversee a team of, uh, fundraising coaches that work one on one with nonprofits throughout the country. Um, and there are 20 of them, and we leveraged our coaches to go in and really help with our, um, developers and everybody else who’s designing Q to make sure that it had that strategy and that thinking around best practices in place so that we could develop that and then. Now for our customers, it is all their information and it’s all gated just for them. No one else can see it. And so what they’re seeing is, um, having that fundraising coach who helped, you know, who, who one on one is, is helping organizations, but then now built into our tools so that it can provide that guidance to help them be more successful from the start. But, I absolutely agree, and I think everybody at Fonterra would agree in saying that, um, you need. You need to have that human in the loop. You need to have the human guiding it and that this is a tool. It’s a tool in our toolbox, but it’s not everything. And that’s another great thing. Um, let’s say that you’re gonna go out to, um, a corporate prospect, and you want to make a pitch to them. You can actually use, you know, AI to help practice that pitch, to really hone in on those talking points and really make it more compelling, uh, ultimately, and hopefully more successful. But I really want to go back, um, for a second if we can to, um, how we go about finding potential corporate partners. Yeah, the prospects, OK, yeah, yeah, I mean, I think that’s really important because I see and hear that a lot, you know, as a fundraising coach, um, how do I find more corporate donors? Uh, it’s, it’s important to look within, right. Ask the questions, to look at those folks who are coming to events. I think a big lost opportunity is you may be hosting an event. Let’s say it is, um, you know, a gala or some sort of thing where you might have corporate sponsorships and people have tables. There’s often not any interaction after that event with those people. People who attended on behalf of that sponsorship, and we don’t even in many cases have the full contact information for them. So, you know, think about how you can begin to capture that contact information and have them opt in because they came to your event, they feel some tie to it, you know, keep that relationship going. That’s a very good idea, the, the, the. The, the representatives of the sponsors, right? The sponsors who bought the, uh, for you, it could be a $1000 table, it could be a $25,000 table. But the, the folks who came to fill that table, They, you know, it was, they weren’t, they, well, some of them may have been forced, but they weren’t all, they probably weren’t all forced. Some of them do have an interest in the work that you do. And right, could that be a, a further lever into the organization, right into the company, right? Is that what you’re suggesting? Absolutely, absolutely great volunteer opportunities. By the way, it could be the spouse of someone who works there who’s also at another company that would, that could be opening a door for you, and we don’t capture that information. We don’t connect with them afterwards, right? We go and we say thanks for coming. And we have their name, uh, because they registered in advance, but, you know, that’s it. Well, we don’t, right, but, you know, but have a little, have a conversation with them, like collect business cards. People still carry business cards. Uh, or you could just use the LinkedIn, um, uh, uh, QR code that is it. So you know, link in with them as, as, and, and leverage LinkedIn. LinkedIn is a great resource for prospecting, um, so that’s another great one. let me share an example of what did not work for me years ago, but I think a lot of, um, uh, new fundraisers, new board members, I’m sure we have many board members listening right now, um, they’ll come to the organization. And they’ll say, oh, there are these huge companies that, in my case, I live in the Washington DC area, that are here in DC. They should be supporting my organization. At this time, I was a, uh, I was a volunteer, uh, development committee member for the volunteer Center, which I, you know, ended up working for later. And I said, all right, let’s go out to all these big companies, and let’s ask them to become involved. Let’s ask them to give a. And I, you know, wrote these beautiful letters and mailed them all out, right? Like, and nobody did because we didn’t have a connection. It doesn’t work. You cannot go in cold like that. You have to find the connection. Another thing that I did is I was, so the geo, the point is the geography is not sufficient. Just because they’re in, just because they’re in the DC area and so are you, doesn’t mean that they’re gonna, they’re gonna accept your funding proposal. And also a lot of times people go, well, this organization has a lot of money. It’s a big company and so there are big bucks available to you. We don’t know that. We don’t know that. So let’s get to know them and let’s see what is possible. Let’s ask them questions, you know, what, um, what types of causes do you support? Um, how do you give to. Uh, the, your organizations, um, is it through grants? Is it through corporate sponsorships? Um, is it through volunteer opportunities? What does your timeline look like for, um, giving, uh, you know, do we need to put in an application? Is there a certain period where they’re open, you know, where there’s open, um, Uh, RFPs and things like what does that process look like? There are some basic questions that you can ask, and that’s great. Um, and then let’s say that you apply for a grant and you don’t receive it. A lot of organizations do not receive those grants in the first go around. Um, and so don’t be afraid to call or reach out to the organization and ask to speak with someone to learn a little bit more about, um, why you were not. Funded and what opportunities may exist and then keep at it, right? Like, we don’t, we don’t succeed the first time every time we go after, uh, a gift, um, or anything really in life, right? Like it, it’s about, um, learning along the way, honing it and developing that. I, I can’t say it enough. It really is the theme of our, of our conversation today, but that relationship is so, so, so important. I, I, I, it’s great advice, uh, to, to follow up when you’re not funded. The, the same advice applies to, to private foundations. When they, when they reject your proposal. Your grant application, ask why. It’s the same, it’s the same on the corporate side. Uh, how do we come short? How can we do better? What didn’t, you know, you might learn, uh, total, you know, we just don’t fund that mission. Well, you, you probably shouldn’t have applied. You probably should have known that going in, but, you know, if it’s that flat, OK, then you know not to pursue that again. But it’s usually more nuanced. It was a diff, it was a close call. It was difficult, you know, we love the work you do, but there was another priority, you know, or something. So, OK, that’s encouraging for next year. Or, you know, but yeah, the, the relationship, you know, just because they said no, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t go back and ask, how come? How come no? Yeah, yeah. And what kind of data are they looking for, right? Um, and there is a move towards more trust-based philanthropy. And so, you know, can you bring that into the conversation as well? I remember, uh, speaking with a woman who had started a nonprofit, and she went to, in this case, to a community foundation, and she said, look, you know, you’re asking me. To give a lot of data to you, uh, for a, a gift that is not a huge gift. And it’s a lot. It’s a lot for a one person shop. You know, how can, how can I do a good job of giving you the, the reporting metrics and the things that you need, um, in a way that makes it mutually beneficial. And, and, and, um. Realistic for me and my organization. Did the company concede a little bit? Did they, they, they did. They actually changed their, they, she joined their board, their advisory board, and they have changed and they have moved more towards trust-based giving. As a result of that, that person stepping forward and saying, you know what, this is a lot. This is a lot. So I also encourage. And this goes back to the relationship, right? Like, I encourage, um, uh, fundraisers and executive directors to go to these funders and say, hey, can we do this a little different? Or this is my issue right now. How can, how can we solve it? Is there a way? And in some cases it can’t be, but in others it is. I volunteer for a local food pantry. I go and I pick up food on the weekends, uh, from a major, major retailer, and I have to punch in a bunch of data that is not the same in their, like, little computer system right next to the door of how many boxes of this item and that item I got. It takes me probably, I don’t know, at least 5 or 10 minutes. To do it. I also have to count, like, what’s in 40 boxes of donated goods. And I take it to the, the food pantry, and the food pantry weighs it. They weigh it. And so, they are scratching their heads. They’re like, this corporate partner of ours is having us, that you collect data that does not equate how we are collecting data. Because we’re weighing the food, so we could tell them exactly how much, but instead they want it in boxes. There’s that like misalignment that actually can cause some friction in the way in which we, we, um, show up to report, right? Like to show impact, and it could be duplicative in some ways too. Or even counterproductive. And we’re, they’re measuring boxes, we’re measuring pounds. Or how many pounds in a box, and then we can, we can work together. Oh, you should see me because there have been times where I get some like loose things. I’m like, is this a box? Like what, what, what, there are 3 things in this box. Like, what does that constitute, you know, and, and what, what category do I put this in? Is this a meat? Is this a dry good? I haven’t heard the, the trend you mentioned toward trust-based, uh, giving of philanthropy. Uh, you’re, you’re seeing a, a, a move away from. So strictly database. Say more about that. You’re the, you’re the first person I’ve heard. Yeah, so trust-based giving, trust-based philanthropy is really in, in, uh, our funders saying, we get that you are going to put our dollars, you know, towards the greatest good, towards, you know, and you have good intention in doing that. And so in some cases, they, they completely scale back how, uh, an organization needs to report on that. That, um, there is a, I think it’s a bank that we work with, who was saying that they do calls. They’ll do like quarterly calls or semiannual calls, um, to hear how the gift is being used. And that’s when they get the stories that they can use in their annual impact reports. So, their corporate impact reports, they can put those really compelling things in there. But they’re trusting the organization to provide them with the, with the information that they need, but not make it so egregious on them from a data capture standpoint. The data is there, but it doesn’t have to be manipulated to meet their needs. Um, so that’s, uh, and we’re seeing that both with community foundations as well as corporate giving, um, and it’s wonderfully refreshing. Interesting. Yeah, I, I wonder if, I, I, I’m, I’m guessing, I’m musing here. I wonder if that’s, uh, any trickle-down from the McKenzie Scott method of giving, you know, she, she, from what I understand, she requires, you know, like a few metrics, uh, you know, I think it’s largely trust-based and, you know, for, for her major, you know, transformative grants. I wonder if that’s, I wonder if what you’re saying is trickling down from her. Our methods, uh, it certainly is impacting it, right, um, but I, it’s been around longer than that, uh, but it’s definitely gaining more steam, and, and so that’s super helpful, um. And we see, you know, uh, we also have seen a lot of this through, um, the GoFundMe’s, right? Like, and the, the fundraising that was being raised, uh, really starting around COVID era, uh, to support community. Hey, I’m going to give, uh, you know, $50 to help, um, buy a neighbor a new refrigerator because, you know, there’s died, right? So, so that we are. Experiencing trust-based philanthropy in many ways now and so it is, it’s another piece of it. Interesting. All right, so Kimberly, leave us with some Inspiring notes on corporate social responsibility and our, our, our, our approaches. You know, what, what, what we can, what we can yield if we’re taking your advice. Uh, I would say this, having spoken with many CSR programs in the past year, I can tell you that they want to do as much as they can to help our sector. Uh, they are deeply embedded in it, and they believe in the great work that everyone is doing. So, please don’t lose heart if you feel like the corporate sector is not giving as much as they should to your organization. or, or, you know, there’s that perception because it, it really isn’t there. I’m seeing a, a real desire to do more and be more creative in the ways in which they support organizations. So, so that is great, right? Like we know corporations care about our sector and want to do good. Um, and so then it’s a matter of how do we make the connections that we need. Need to have these deep, you know, corporate relationships. And that comes from diversifying your base of corporate supporters, um, always being on the lookout for new potential, um, sponsors and supporters, right? And, and looking at those relationships that exist through your board, your volunteers, um, and employees and other stakeholders. Right? Asking for introductions, um, going out and networking, those are great ways. I always look at it like a bull’s eye, you know, who is really close to our organization, and then how can we kind of look out and beyond, um, to find new connections. Um, don’t put all your eggs in one basket, right? Like one corporate partner is wonderful, but boy, if that’s your only corporate partner and they’re changing their strategy, um, or. They can no longer support you, that’s a big threat. So, so begin to, you know, think through what that strategy of acquiring more corporate donors looks like, and the discipline that it takes to build that, because they don’t always happen overnight. They can, it might take a year or 2 or 3. I loved your idea, Tony, of asking for, um, a multi-year gift. I think that’s really sound as you think about sustainability. Um, I think it’s also great if you can do any kind of virtual opportunities or small micro opportunities for your, um, uh, for volunteering with your organization, uh, get creative around that, uh, and then also celebrate your corporate partners when you can, through your own annual impact reports or your, your quarterly impact reports or whatever you do. Through your newsletters, right? Like, think about that. You don’t have to overpromote though. I think that’s another thing for people to think about is there’s no need to, unless it’s part of the relationship that was established, they don’t have to be thanked every single time in every single way, right? Like, have those conversations, but try to keep it in a way that really feels natural for your organization. And then also, um, well, I know you’re a little hesitant about the, the prospect of AI, what we know, we, we, uh, published an AI readiness report at the end of the year and we found that 91% of funders are expecting to see a positive impact from AI. We know that they, um, understand that nonprofits will be using this moving forward and that there’s. Great opportunity to, to scale down on some of the, the back-end work that, and time that it takes to do fundraising and engagement and other things. So, AI will help with that. So what AI is able to do is it’ll be able to help, um, you spend more time on those personal relationships, more time really thinking about how to maximize fundraising opportunities. And Um, that’s what gets me really excited. Folks can go and, and, um, check out our AI readiness report. We actually have a, like an AI readiness quiz they can take. Um, we’ve made some predictions for 2026 around how organizations are going to be using AI. And, um, and then just in, in kind of thinking about CSR, um, having it be a piece of your overall fundraising pie. Kimberly O’Donnell, Chief fundraising officer at, uh, Bonterra. You’ll find the company at Bonterraech.com, and Kimberly is on LinkedIn. Kimberly, thank you very much. Thanks for sharing all this. Thank you. It was great being here. Next week, your inclusive strategic plan in 5 steps. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you, find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martinetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.
Dylan Bassett: Systems & Processes So Your People Thrive
Dylan Bassett helps you create your invisible infrastructure, so you can quietly reduce burnout, increase efficiency and make it easier for your nonprofit to grow. He shares the signs that your internal systems are weak, explains how to pick the right tools to complement your work reality and helps you design workflows and templates that ease your team’s cognitive load. Dylan leads Dept. 1 Solutions.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite hebdomadal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d be stricken with Asthinopia if I saw that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, to tell us what’s going on. Hey Tony, here’s what’s going on. Systems and processes, so your people thrive. Dylan Bassett helps you create your invisible infrastructure, so you can quietly reduce burnout, increase efficiency, and make it easier for your nonprofit to grow. He shares the signs that your internal systems are weak, explains how to pick the right tools to complement your work reality, and helps you design workflows and templates that ease your team’s cognitive load. Dylan leads Department One Solutions. On Tony’s take 2. Tales from the gym, 21 degrees, Tim. Here is systems and processes, so your people thrive. It’s a pleasure to welcome Dylan Bassett to nonprofit radio. Dylan leads Department One Solutions, a consulting practice helping small and mid-size nonprofits strengthen their operations, implement practical technology, and build the internal systems that make mission work sustainable. The company is at departmentonesolutions.com. It’s DEPT One Solutions, and Dylan is on LinkedIn. Dylan Bassett, welcome to Nonprofit Radio. Thank you so much for having me. I’m glad you’re with us to talk about systems. This is something, uh, I think it’s undervalued. Uh, I don’t think we’ve ever done a show after 770 something on like systems. I mean, specifically on systems and processes, you know, lots of guests talk about having a process for this or that, but not a comprehensive conversation about. System-wide systems. You have a, uh, you have a strong belief that, that you say that systems create space for people to thrive. How, why? Lead us into this. Sure, uh, well, first, I’m honored, uh, to be the first quote unquote systems process, uh, podcast that you’ve done on the show. Um, and I definitely agree that it is something that is probably undervalued and under. Represented, I think in the general discourse about nonprofits. A lot of what I see in the space is fundraising, communications, and CRMs, and we definitely work on and with and within CRMs, um, but generally the systems and process conversation tends to fall by the wayside, um, to address your question specifically about how I believe they create space is. There are a lot of nonprofits that have tools that they need to work within or need to work with. Um, less nonprofits have tools that work for them and actually support them in their work. And so that’s really kind of the key transformation that we at Department One help to bring about for nonprofits where. A lot of teams are Sort of passengers to the tools that they have within the organization, they work the way they do because that’s, they have to fit into a system and so we try to shift that more so towards what is the way that we work and let’s configure a system that supports that and mirrors the reality rather than trying to fit, you know, a square peg in a round hole of the way we work and the way the system works. OK, so, so the humans don’t need to conform. To the technology we can, you’re talking about processes that reflect the reality of how that, that team that we’re talking about is working. Exactly, exactly. All right, it’s cool. All right, so that’s encouraging. Um, you, you have, uh, the invisible infrastructure that we’re, we’re kind of, you’re kind of talking around it. I mean, we’re talking, you know, we’re, we’re, we’re hinting at it, but what, what’s your, what’s your invisible infrastructure look like? So, the invisible infrastructure is, you know, under the same umbrella that we’ve been talking about of the systems that our sustainable nonprofits. Um, a lot of nonprofits don’t really realize that something is missing until something breaks, and this could be a literal tool in itself, a standard process for the way that things are done. Um, and then primarily as well, the cost of operating without structure, in terms of sunk effort, sunk staff time, sunk cost literally in technology tools that aren’t delivering us value or the, the thing that breaks could be a human. Very much so, the organization or the team, right. Somebody’s, somebody’s burned out, a team is burnt out, they’re underproductive, they’re miserable. It could be a person or a team or certainly, you know, as you said, it could be the technology, but like, how do we know, OK, so this is, we’re trying to create a happier life. You want people thriving, not just, not just surviving, not just tolerating the technology. Yeah, don’t just, all right, it, yeah, it’s OK. It works. It works. It turns on when I, when I get there in the morning, um. But you are thriving, thriving, thriving people, thriving teams. So, how do we know, I mean, aside from people like throwing laptops out the window or bashing them. Uh, you know, with their shoes or something like that, aside, aside from those, those subtle clues that the technology is not working for us, what, like what are we, what are we looking for that, that hints that we don’t have the right tools supporting our, our people? Yeah, um, the couple of things that I look for are when we are. Supporting more of our work through like manual inputs than systematic inputs. So this is, you know, it could be anything from systematic like Exports and uploads, which is a really common thing that we help organizations resolve, as well as the integration of the tools that we’re using. Um, ultimately, we want teams to be able to deliver programs, steward donor relationships, um, you know, plan at the executive level. Having tools that support each of those kind of core work streams, um, across the organization. And so, a lot of the time, what we look at Is what are the tools in our technology stack, which is just the array of tools that we might be using, uh, either across the organization or within a given department. How are they talking to each other and really honing in on the areas that they’re not talking to each other. So a really common example of this that’s probably relatable to a lot of the audience is in the fundraising space. A lot of organizations have. Either a donor platform, a CRM, and an accounting platform that the go-between is them. And what we try to shift is that the go-between is no longer them, and the go-between is actually those systems natively working together. And what this enables is rather than someone having to check the donation platform every day, week, month, whatever it may be, to find donors. Enter the donation in the CRM, account for it properly on, you know, a QuickBooks or another accounting platform, and then go, you know, write a reminder down in their notebook to send, you know, a thank you note or give that donor a phone call. We build systems that all of that stuff happens automatically. So when we get a new donation in, it’s integrated to our CRM we get that notification, it automatically creates a task for someone to go and do it, and then maybe sets a task up for our book. Bookkeeper bookkeeper to go and reconcile that in the accounting platform. That is a system where a nonprofit professional can thrive and focus on the work that they’re meant to be doing, which is stewarding a donor relationship, not entering data into QuickBooks. OK, and I, I would add another level of interest, which is maybe it flags that, that process flags donors above a certain level because that, that person we wanna do a, a human call, uh, for us, for some people it might be a $50 donation. If your average is like 5 or $10 it might be $5000 if your average is $1500 or $2000 you know. And then, and then so, so sends a, sends a task. You, you just got a $5000 donation from this person. You can tap to see the record or, you know, just here’s the phone number, you know, whatever you want. OK, so you’re if I can add to that quickly, um, so you know when you talk about how we handle certain relationships, this is a bit of A sidebar, but it’s definitely in the same ecosystem. Um, when we talk about, you know, how we handle or escalate relationships like above a certain donation threshold, for example, this is an extremely common use case, and a lot of folks, the word that people use for it, at least that I see is segmentation, right? Segmenting our audience based on their capacity to support us. Um, a lot of organizations do it based on On that gift level. Some organizations do it based on engagement or a blend of the two. But what we’re talking about is reaching different pieces of our audience with messaging that is more relevant to where they sit in our mission. And a lot of folks think this is a strictly communications issue where we need to have a way to message those people in a more relevant way. In order to message those people in a more relevant way, it’s really a technology problem in that we need a way to identify what these different segments are, what these different levels of giving, what these different levels of engagement are, and the primary way to do that scalably and sustainably is through well integrated technology. You’re looking for spots where humans are intervening. Between the technologies and, and you’re trying to, you’re trying to eliminate those, like you mentioned uploads or manual data, manual entry of gifts or something like that in the, in the accounting system and because the CRM doesn’t talk or something like that. All right, all right. Is, is there technology where, um, uh, uh, we can do this with, uh, paper checks? There’s still people. Uh, no, I don’t write that many checks, but I am a baby boomer, uh, young, young baby boomer, very, very, very, very young, right at the cusp of baby boomer. Uh, but I’m, I’m sure I write more checks a month than you do. Suppose, suppose we’re getting paper checks. Can, can that be, like, can, uh, is there a scanner, Is there a technology that’ll scan that name and Either add it to the CRM or, or maybe find it in the CRM and then you have to manually create the record if it doesn’t currently exist. Does that, does that kind of technology exist with paper gift, paper check gifts? It does, um, if it doesn’t, if it doesn’t, you can say no, it’s OK. It’s less common and the way that we account for that is, um, I’ll use the word systems thinking, um, so at department. On solutions, um, we’re not communication strategists by trades, we’re not strategic planners by trade. We are technologists and systems thinkers and so as part of systems thinking. The baseline, you know, the 101 is, we think about the ideal path, which is kind of like what we just described. Someone, you know, submits a donation digitally through our online giving platform, we can easily hook that into our CRM and our accounting software. We also can. Consider what are called edge cases, which are things that kind of fall outside of that ideal flow through our systems. So in the case of paper checks, we obviously know that this is something that we’re never going to get away from entirely. At least maybe not for another generation. Yeah, you gotta, you gotta wait till a lot of people, a lot more people have died. Yeah, yeah. Or I mean for some nonprofits they, they, it, it could be, it could be the typical use case if their donor base is very old. I mean if their donor base is 55 plus, the, the which is perfectly valid, it just, it just changed. what our ideal case is and what we spend more time investing into building a solid process for. And so when we look at those edge cases, we say, OK, this may not come in through the digital giving platform, but what’s, you know, if you think of the process as a bunch of steps and maybe we have a person kick one thing off, then the technology does 6 or 8 things, and then we do one thing to wrap it up. How far can we get that technology to stretch along the lines of the steps that we need to take, um, and that’s how we, you know, account for something like a written check. And so, short of having it end to end integrated, it may be, OK. When we get paper checks, we know this is something that we need to do, say, monthly. We go and enter them in according to you know their CRM profiles. And then from the CRM then we can go and hook that up with our donation platform and our accounting platform. So there’s a manual entry step. But again, there are some, you know, the cost of doing business, uh, right, there are some things that will be unavoidable, but we do as much as we can in those kind of edge cases. Yeah, sure, alright. But so you’re not aware of a technology that’ll scan a check. And, and Find the, find that name. In the CRM based on Based on the check scan, I would caution against the technology that does that like it would be a proprietary, it would be a, I’m I’m envisioning a, a proprietary reader. I mean, not just a scanner, but you know, the part of the platform is the hardware where you feed checks in, ideally high speed. And it searches the CRM. OK, is that, uh, you were caution. You were gonna ca, I would say for something like that, when, whenever we translate from like something handwritten to data, unless we’re, you know, we always want a verification step. So, you know, in, and this is like the technologists, the systems thinking when we, you know, imagine something like a fantastic proprietary scanner that could handle all of these checks at speed. We would be careful not to automatically go and assign them to a record in our CRM because we could kind of misclassify certain donations. Maybe someone has the same last name, but a different address, and it puts them in the wrong bucket, and then we’re having a conversation with a donor that they have no context of. So yeah, there’s the handwritten amount. To, uh, uh, suppose somebody leaves the zeros off or something, you know, or, or, or there’s a messy writer and you can’t, you can’t reconcile the number with the, with the letter with the words. OK, so you would, you would want a manual step of reconciliation before the, the CRM and the accounting system get updated. Yeah, this is a great business idea. Is it? OK, good. Well, yeah. All right, go. You run with it. I got my businesses. I’m publishing a book this year. I’m, I’m booked. You, uh, you think about it. You, you think about it. Um, all right. But you know, the baby boomer, of course, has got ask about paper checks. What else? What, what are, what else are we looking for? Like symptoms of symptoms where scenarios where the technology could, could be, could be pushed together more, fewer human interactions. What, what else are we looking for? Any, anything else, uh, I mean. There’s a lot of different places I could go with this, be it like use case specific in terms of like the process that we’re trying to conduct, or tool specific in terms of, you know, what this is meant to do for us. Um. A few very common symptoms are that I hear across different departments, across workflows, across tools is we’re using XYZ tool, but we’re not really making the most of it. To me, that is like the number one thing that I look for because there is A lot of underinvested effort in actually making these tools do what we want them to do. Particularly with the advent of, you know, just to name a few of, and department One Solutions, we’re system agnostic, we work across these tools because we’re systems experts first, and a lot of these tools are really built in the same way. So if you’re familiar with one. You can pretty much go pull all the levers that you might need to in another. But for example, you know, your Salesforces, your HubSpots, your Monday CRMs, your Bloomerangs, your neon ones, all those types of tools, um. Teams will get these tools in place and they will be shiny Excel sheets, more or less, where we have a list of a bunch of names and a lot of information and the tool, we have it, but we haven’t invested in actually maximizing what we’re paying for it. A lot of these tools don’t come for free. Some of them do, which is very interesting from a technology perspective. There’s a lot of You know, upright quadrant tools, industry leading tools that are starting to offer their products to nonprofits, nonprofits at significantly discounted rates or entirely free, um, for very robust technology, uh, which is very interesting. Um, and great from an implementer standpoint because I get to work with world-class tools for organizations that are really now making the most of them, um, but yeah, mainly it’s, you know, we’re looking for organizations that have tools but know that they’re not making the most of them because a lot of it, we’re paying for this thing, we’re, we’re paying whatever licensing fee or, you know, depending on the size of the tool, there might be consulting fees that go along with it or. You know, 100 hours a month of, uh, and, and we’re not, and we’re not, yeah, we’re just not, not taking advantage. All right, yeah, and how that, how that really impacts the organization and the mission is we’re, Investing money in technology, and we’re not getting any return from it. Um, and then we’re also kind of forcing our staff to use these tools that do nothing in return for them. You know, if I’m gonna go and plug a bunch of information into this tool and be forced to kind of abide by the framework that it prescribes me as a nonprofit professional, I want it to do something for me on the back end, whether it be automating a process for me, covering some, you know, lightweight follow up. Being able to generate a report that’s reliable, um, but a lot of the time we get in, you know, get to kind of the first step of setting it up, and then the other operational and capacity needs come rushing back in and we say, OK, you know, we’ll, we’ll get to this, and it never gets gotten to, which is the problem that we solve. You’re how the, to do gets done. Uh, let’s see, uh, How do we Pick the right to, well, uh, it’s not, not quite there yet. What can we do on our own? Like, what, what, what can we, you’ve given us some like some symptoms of, you know, what to, what to look for, but What can we, what can we try to do on our own? Well, I guess one thing would be take full advantage of the system, the, the, the technology stack that you have got. Like talk to the vendor. If you feel it’s being underutilized, talk to the vendor for Pete’s sake and find out how, how do you, how do you do this other, uh, this other reconciliation function automatically instead of us doing it. What else, what else could we be tweaking on our own that can better utilize the technology we’ve, we’ve already got? So before we get to systems, um, systems work best within a controlled environment, and obviously we try to build systems that are adaptable and flexible and resilient to changing variables, but. Before we jump into a system, the best place to start is to begin standardizing processes. So the things that we do as a team on a week to week, month to month basis, start writing these down, whether it’s how we plan for and deliver events or. Or what is our standard communication process for a new donor, for a major donor, for our monthly newsletter, for our annual report, start writing down the how to make a peanut butter jelly sandwich steps of each of those processes, because ultimately when you start that, then everyone begins. Executing the process in the same way, which helps efficiency, there’s less questions, it’s easier to onboard new staff, so that has benefits in itself, and that’s part of what we do as well. That’s the beginning of a lot of the projects that we do is, what do we do today? From that, it becomes much easier to map that to what we need out of a tool. Um, and so, assuming that there are some elements of technology in that process that we’ve documented. We start again trying to expand the number of steps that technology can do for us. So if it’s kind of, you know, for example, um, You know, a, a, a new donor follow-up sequence that we’re gonna go and get in touch with them. If it’s, all right, it lands in technology, and then I have to go manually send an email, and then I put, you know, make a note that I sent the email, and then create a task for myself to follow up. Where there are gaps in that technology, it starts to come back to kind of where we started, where we’re trying to extend that technology. From where it typically starts either at the middle or at the very beginning and extend that closer to end to end, um, but the best way to start is writing down the process that you’ve got now. It’s kind of an audit, you know, a little bit, a little bit of it and document it, but you know, it starts small. Like you can’t, you can’t document all your programs or audit all your programs, but, you know, maybe just in. Like a new donor sequence, for instance, or you know, how does, how does a gift get into the accounting system after the CRM or, or you know, some something like that. Audit is a, audit to me is a, a gray word. It’s very, um, you don’t like that word. I don’t, I don’t mind it because it is, it’s an accurate representation, um. It’s not super fun. I like current state analysis or process documentation. Wait, wait, requirements gathering. Wait, wait, wait. All right, so current state analysis. What was the second one? Process documentation, um. Developing SOPs, um, and then requirements gathering. And requirements gathering is basically taking our standard process and then saying, OK, what do we need from this process? What do we need the technology to do within that? And that’s our requirement of the given technology. All right. So audit, that’s two syllables. All right. Current state current state analysis. I agree it sounds, I agree it sounds a lot sexier than audit. Uh, OK, well, it’s people hear audit and they think, they think tax people, they think legal people, that’s not me. I’m much more fun than that. It’s time for Tony’s take 2. Thank you, Kate. tales from the gym, 21 degrees, Tim. You may recall Tim. He’s the, uh, gentleman, oh, might be 2 years ago now. So it’d be a stretch for you to recall this, but he was the guy who was, uh, telling everyone it was his birthday, that, that one day in the gym. So Tim, uh, I’ve seen Tim twice walking one time from the gym, another time to the gym. As I was driving my car to the gym, he’s walking. Shirtless. He’s got his, uh, t-shirt in his hand. Wearing a pair of shorts, you know, sneakers, of course, but both times it was 20 degrees or, or it was like 21 degrees. So the 2nd time after I saw him, I was in the gym. I was on the elliptical, and he came in. I, and this was, I guess it was the 3rd time I saw him walking by the window because I like the elliptical that faces the window. All the others face the center of the room. There’s one elliptical that faces outward and it’s right in front of a window, so I get to look out the window, and so I saw him coming by. Shirtless, 21 degrees out. So, when he came in, I asked him, what’s, what’s with the, uh, you know, I’ve seen you a couple of times now. What’s with the, everybody else is wearing parkas and pants, of course. What’s up with the bare chest in the, in the 20 degrees? He said it’s invigorating. And he builds up this something called brown fat. And he explained that brown fat. Helps keep you warm, uh, but it, because it, the way it metabolizes, it’s creating heat energy in your body. So it’s not just that the brown fat keeps you warm because it’s fat and it, it protects you from the cold weather because it’s a layer of fat, but it’s, it’s the way it’s, uh, consuming itself creates the heat and that keeps you warm and then he also explained that he uses a breathing technique. From this guy called uh Wim Hof, who I looked up, uh, and this breathing technique helps him avoid the cold of the pain. You, you hyperventilate and then you hold your breath. Uh, I, I’ve read about it, but, you know, I’m not, I’m not here to teach the, uh, Wim Hof breathing technique, but it’s this series of breathing, uh, different breaths and, and holding breath that you go through and it helps you, uh, Reduce stress and even pain, he said it reduces the pain of the cold, and then, 21 degrees, Tim. He said he goes home and he does not take a hot shower like you would think. He takes a cold shower when he goes home. After walking, I asked him how long the walk is. He said it’s 14 minutes from his home to the gym. So he walks home 14 minutes, takes a cold shower. And then he warms up by presumably putting clothes on. I didn’t, I didn’t wanna ask what he does after the shower. I don’t, I don’t really need to go that level of detail. What, what, what happens when you step out of the shower naked. Uh, it’s not necessary. I don’t really, I mean, I have to look at this guy in the gym from time to time, so. But that’s the story of, uh, 21 degrees Tim. He likes to be invigorated. Does it routinely throughout the winter. And that’s Tony’s take too. Kate Oh yeah, I was supposed to give you a cue, Kate, Kate. Your, your story was making me cold. I’m freezing just sitting inside my house. Yeah, go take a cold shower. You can go take a cold shower. Oh, how is the snow by you? Melted now, but I had 14 inches in the driveway. All gone now. It got a little bit warmer and it rained for several hours today. That’ll do it. Yes, yes. We’ve got Beauco butt loads more time. Here’s the rest of Systems and processes, so your people thrive with Dylan Bassett. Tell us a story. We’ve been talking kind of in the abstract because of the questions I’ve, you know, the questions I’ve been asking, things I wanted to talk about, but tell us a story about a, a nonprofit that, that, it doesn’t have to be a, an overarching revolution in the organization, but tell us a change story based on improved technology and, and, and processes, you know, you, some systems, some processes that came to them that, uh, they, they weren’t, they weren’t previously doing. You didn’t just come to them, you create, you helped them, you, uh, you created them for them. Give us a, you know, like a, a good, a good case story, case study. So, um, a use case that comes up often is for service delivery organizations. So think of these as Um, you know, for example, these are organizations like, um, folks who help outfit, um, low-income individuals to get their first job, uh, or a new job, um, you know, help them with boots and, um, outfit that they need for work, um, or. Organizations that provide legal aids, um, you know, service delivery organizations, they tend to have intake processes. Um, they may be done through a form on a website or through a piece of paper in the office, and then that form tends to be entered into some system somewhere. Um, and then we do a lot of kind of manual follow up based on that. And so one. use case that gets brought up frequently is an intake and sort of triage automation workflow, where rather than maybe we have a Google form that sends to a spreadsheet, and then from that spreadsheet, we need to copy everything over into our system or a. form that we go and then manually enter. Building up a system where we have a form that’s accessible. You know, if you’re in the office, you can use a device that we have. If you have your own device, you can scan a QR code or you can find it on the website. We enter that information in. It’s automatically sending to our system, whatever it may be, a CRM or a program delivery system, where we are then creating a new record of a client and what type of intake information, whether it be demographics or services needed, or referrals requested, we capture that information and then we can triage it to the correct program specialists depending on the diversity of the programs that a nonprofit might deliver. So if it’s. Exactly, you know, addressing the issue, or if it’s a referral specialist, we can send that to the correct dashboard for that program coordinator, and then they can go and see that land at the top of their list and say, I need to reach out to this person. When they reach out to that person, maybe we have an automatic integration with our email, maybe not. Um, but that might be one spot where they need to intervene in the system. They say, all right, I sent this email, and it automatically creates a follow-up task reminder for them to go and get back in touch if they haven’t heard anything. And then through that system as well, we can track, you know, almost that like a line. like a tab at a restaurant of like, we helped this person with this, we helped this person with this, and then ultimately close their case and say, OK, this is a person we served in X Y Z way. And then that all feeds into impact reporting that we’re accumulating over the course of a year. This is something that happens frequently, um, just the nature of the organizations that I work with, a lot of them tend to be direct service delivery, um. And in my opinion, that is kind of the essence of, you know, creating space for people to thrive, because then that program coordinator isn’t so much focused on how they need to handle the information or what they need to remember or put in their notebook. Then we have a system that is supporting a program coordinator as they deliver services. to a client or a constituent, um, and they don’t have to worry about keeping track of it because the system does and then at the end of the year when our executive committee goes to put together our annual report, we’ve got great information about who we served on a demographic basis, when we served them, and what services were delivered to them, um, that we can then go and demonstrate on the development and stewardship side. Yeah, you got your outcomes. Yeah, exactly. What’s your background? Do you have some kind of systems background or engineering or human, human, human factors? What, what are you, what are you all about? I am, um, so I’ve, my formal education is in information systems and entrepreneurship. I studied at the University of Minnesota, um. So I learned systems thinking, the system development life cycle, how to implement tools, how to understand the way that data behaves in systems. I was never a software engineer. I was never a coder. I was never a computer. Programmer, when I was coming through school, they told us explicitly, you are gonna be the translator between people who don’t speak technology and people who speak technology better than you. And so I interface between. You know, non-technical people, and either technical tools or, you know, software engineers, coders, computer scientists. And that’s my formal education. I spent a couple of years in, um, working at a national bank as a business analyst, so doing exactly that, working with the business functions of the bank, helping them turn their business need into stuff that computer programmers could work from. Then jumped into corporate consulting, which got into a little bit more of the uh problem diagnosis, the assessment type work, the kind of consulting narrative type work, and now in Departmental Solutions. Um, you know, after a handful of years in the corporate space, um, I just knew that I wanted to do values driven work. Always had a sense that I wanted to own my own business and do work that served a greater purpose. And so, kind of just had a, you know, straw that broke the camel’s back moment at, uh, my consulting gig. And said, I’m gonna leave this, and made the decision to serve nonprofits almost exclusively, um, with no connections in the nonprofit space, no prior experience at nonprofits, no, not even a real good understanding of how nonprofits worked, just knowing that they make an impact, they do work that helps people, and I wanna help them help people. Um, and that was kind of the start of Department one. Can you, uh, give a little detail on the, the straw that broke the camel’s back moment? Like, I, it was, um, What happened? I just didn’t have any emotion about the work that I was doing or the people I was doing it for, and this was also somewhat aligned with the pandemic. This was in consulting, the consulting gig, correct, yeah, yeah, yeah, correct. So it’s corporate consulting, you know, I’m working at a firm with like 50,000 employees in the United States, um. aligns with COVID, those timelines overlap almost 100%. And there was just kind of this, you know, everyone kind of went through it, this awakening of like, You’re pinned at home, you can’t leave the house, and, you know, you wake up from bed, roll over to your desk, do this work that you don’t care about, and then repeat. And I was like, I don’t want my life to feel this way. Um, and so, it was a mix of that along with some of the corporate consulting staffing practices in terms of utilization of employees or overutilization of employees, which If anyone’s worked in consulting, um, they’re probably familiar with. And so it was a mix of those things where I was like, my life is more than this, and I want it to feel better and more impactful. Um, so yeah, that was, that was kind of the moment of like, Something needs to change. Um, and it was less about the work that I was doing, and more about the purpose that I was doing the work, and the people I was doing the work for. Had you worked with nonprofits when you were younger or volunteered or like what, what, what, you just, you just always knew nonprofits existed? Nebulous, like I knew charities existed. I didn’t really like understand the, the nonprofit as a business model, um, until after I had left my previous job, um. And no, it, it really was just a desire to do work that aligned with my personal beliefs, the things that I cared about, um, you know, environmentalism, human rights, um, economic equality, all those sorts of things. I knew that those were core to who I was as a human being, and I wanted my work to be reflective of that. And it’s, it’s a decision that’s been validated many times over because I, and I’m sure you know this as well. When you do work that is really aligned with your purpose as a human, um, there’s no friction or conflict between what you do for work and who you are as a person. Um, and it just feels like it’s just an all an expression of me, um, and that feels really satisfying. I, and, you know, the, the system side of everything, I’ve always just kind of been like a A take apart toy kind of guy, like a systems guy, like step wise type of person and so that fit well from an educational perspective and now I get to apply this way that I feel like my brain has always been wired to, you know, the values that I believe deeply at my core as, as a human. Congratulations. I admire the, I, I admire the alignment. Thank you. Did you play with Legos when you were a young boy? You did. See, I thought maybe, all right, I was Legos. Did you wait, did you go outside the Lego, you know, the step by step and create your own? Oh yeah, design? Yeah, I was making like, I was making like battlefields and houses and like castles and universes and Had bikes and skateboards and, and cars and all that sort of stuff. It was always Tinker toys. Interesting. Yeah, all right, all right. So it goes back to the Legos. Yeah, something like that. And from an entrepreneurship perspective as well, uh, there are a number of people in my family that would, uh, gladly share the story of when I, um, I started a vegetable garden in my parents’ front yard, um, and was selling cherry tomatoes for like quarters apiece because I was driven to make $500 in one summer. This was like. I think I was like 5 or 6 years old. I was like, I just want to hustle. Uh, so now all three of those things, the Legos, the vegetable garden, uh, have now kind of come together. And, and the added dose of, uh, formal education. I love the vegetables. Yeah, yeah, no, I love the vegetable garden selling cherry tomatoes. Cherry tomato, did you meet your goal? Did you make the $500 in the summer? I did. There’s a picture of me. With 5 $100 bills and like a toothless smile like I got it. All right. That’s, uh, that’s a lot, was that 2000 cherry tomatoes, isn’t it, for $500? It was a lot. I also did 25 cents apiece. I think that’s $2000 housework, yeah, I mowed some lawn. I did, I did all that stuff, yep, at 5 years old. This is a 5 year old story. Whenever I, I feel like it was early grade school, so I, I, somewhere between 5 to 8, honestly, I don’t even remember how old I was at, at like kindergarten. Well, thanks for sharing all that. Let’s get down the Legos and the cherry tomatoes, cherry tomato in the front yard, front yard, not the back. There wasn’t enough sun, but there was not enough sunlight in the back. There was a good patch of grass in the front yard that my parents were willing to sacrifice to my adventure. Look what that sacrifice led, led to. What else do you want to talk about systems, systems and processes that, that I haven’t asked you or, you know, you just, you feel is important for us to know. I think one of the most important trends that I’m seeing in the nonprofit space is a. Move away from some of the quote unquote nonprofit first technology platforms towards some of the more traditional industry leaders, um, just to say I’m not, uh, you know, I’m not sponsored. I don’t get any commission or anything from any new platform you can drop names, OK, that’s right, yeah, yeah, um. So for example, like HubSpot is a big one that I know many organizations use but underutilized, and that’s a really, really capable tool. I have mixed feelings about Salesforce just because the user interface tends to be less intuitive than a lot of nonprofit professionals may do best with, um, and one that has been. Very pervasive in a lot of different conversations, both from like a work management tool, so something to help us manage our tasks, as well as a tool that can support CRM functions is Monday.com. Um, Part of the reason that I like Monday.com a lot is They offer their professional tier, which is like their 3rd tier of a tool. It offers hugely robust automation capabilities, communications capabilities, the number of different templates and layouts that you can have, and custom fields, and it’s a fully flexible system that they offer to qualifying nonprofits for free. And so it’s a tool that’s extremely flexible, um. It’s easy to use, easy to jump into their tutorial videos and their knowledge bases, um, to implement for either a project management tool or a CRM or both, um, and it’s free. And so a lot of nonprofits, at least that I’ve been working with, I know there are other tools out there that have similar offers. Um, Monday.com is the one that I’ve got the most experience with and hear about very, very frequently. Um. I have a client that uses Monday.com just for project management. But, but you’re saying they have a CRM also? Yes, yep, they have a CRM. It’s very flexible and so like to someone jumping into it for the first time, it might feel a little big blue ocean, um, but. It has a lot of, you know, third party integrations with your donation platforms, with your communications platforms. It’s also a communication platform in itself, has solid automation capability, and it’s free. And you know, if you look at from a technology perspective, if you go look at some of the leading tools in the CRM space and the project management space, Monday.com is right up there. So from The perspective of a technologist who works in these tools and has to recommend them to clients. It’s hard to justify a decision that doesn’t at least incorporate that as a consideration. Um, so just something, and, you know, there have been organizations that have been deeply invested in Monday.com that I’ve arrived to, and they’re paying for it because they, they weren’t even aware of this nonprofit pricing offer. Um, I don’t know. If that offer will change, or if, you know, they might restrict it further or might add a, you know, a discounted rate, but currently it’s free. Um, and it’s been working exceptionally well for a lot of different organizations that I’ve helped both optimize existing use and implement from the ground up. Do you take advantage of TechSoup and, and their offerings for nonprofits? Do you, do you, some clients sometimes benefit from that? So, definitely, um, something I’m aware of, I have seen. Kind of mixed relationships. Like I’ve seen organizations really make a lot out of it, and then some organizations not really have a great experience using TechSoup. Um, I use it as a point of reference if we are in more of an assessment type exercise where we, we wanna get off the tool that we’re currently using. And we’re evaluating alternatives. It helps from a cost perspective to see what kind of discounts are available or what kind of offers are available on TechSoup, and we can incorporate that into our decision criteria, but in Candor, it’s not a huge kind of piece of my operating model. OK, OK. All right, so Dylan, leave us with, um, like inspiration, inspiration around systems and processes. What, what, where we can get to. Where we can get to, um, Thriving. Yes, thriving, um, I think there is a misconception. Maybe I’m speaking to our, um, you know, our donor audience that, that might be listening to this show, um, but give general operating, um. From where I sit, general operating expense is the thing that holds most nonprofits back because that is the line item in the budget that tends to get invested in the type of work that I do. And as, yeah, and as someone who is. Working in these tools and sees the transformation from a team that has tools that don’t work for them, versus a team that has tools that do. If you want your nonprofit, whichever one is closest to your heart, if you want your nonprofit to be successful, give general operating. Um, give unrestricted gifts, because those gifts can be allocated. Also, if you trust the leadership of your nonprofit. You should trust them to make wise decisions about the cash that’s being spent, um. And if you don’t, maybe consider an organization that you do have that trust with, or ask them, ask their program coordinators, ask their, you know, their development director, their advancement director, if I give unrestricted, what are you guys gonna use it for? And I’m sure they’d be happy to share with you their strategic plan and let you know what’s on the roadmap. And some of it might include, yeah, we want to migrate to a new CRM. And I think a lot of those expenditures. tend to be viewed as unnecessary or Um, not additive to the mission, but in terms of reach and operational efficiency, ultimately nonprofits are businesses just like any other, and they need those tools, they need these systems, they need efficiency in order to be able to deliver on their mission. Um, and just, and just sort of flip that to our listeners is, you know, technology is an investment. Absolutely. It’s worth, it’s, it’s worth spending the money. To not only implement, but then continue to upgrade, maintain. Because it comes together for your team. I think so. We want our teams to be thriving, not just surviving alongside the technology, but thriving. With it and spending our time on the human side. Exactly. When things can be done at, at de minimis cost faster by the technology we’ve got in, you know, in this, in this, in the, in this decade. Yeah, that would be my, my, my big call to action. All right, Dylan Bassett. From, uh, cherry tomatoes to current state analyst. That’s right. Thanks very much for sharing. Thanks so much for having me on. This was a pleasure. No, I’m glad. The company is at departmentonesolutions.com. It’s DEPT, the number 1solutions.com, and you can connect with Dylan on LinkedIn as I have done. Thank you very much again, Dylan. Thank you, Tony. Next week, savvy CSR seeking. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you, find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Mirer Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martinetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.
Bofta Yimam: Grow Your Personal Brand & Your Nonprofit
As a nonprofit leader, you can build your personal brand and watch benefits accrue to both you and your organization. With the right messaging, strategy, consistency, and authentic connection, your individual and nonprofit brands coexist, and each sees increased visibility and impact. Emmy Award winner Bofta Yimam, founder of StoryLede, explains it all.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite hebdomadal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer the embarrassment of osteatosis if you got under my skin with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, with what’s up. Hey Tony, here’s what’s coming. Grow your personal brand and your nonprofit. As a nonprofit leader, you can build your personal brand and watch benefits accrue to both you and your organization. With the right messaging, strategy, consistency, and authentic connection, your individual and nonprofit brands coexist. And each sees increased visibility and impact. Emmy Award winner Bota Yimam, founder of Story Lead, explains it all. On Tony’s take 2. My moment of vulnerability. Here is, grow your personal brand and your nonprofit. It’s a genuine pleasure to welcome BFTA Yee Mom to nonprofit Radio. BFTA is an Emmy and Edward R. Murrow Award-winning journalist and founder of Story Lead. As the first Ethiopian American newscaster to receive an Emmy. She helps nonprofit founders and thought leaders amplify their stories and boost visibility. Her company is at storylead LED.com and BOFTA is on LinkedIn, very active there. Welcome to the show, BOFTA. Hey, it’s so good to be here. Thanks for having me, Tony. It’s a pleasure to meet you this way. We do a lot of, uh, sharing and commenting, etc. on LinkedIn. But this is, this is much, much better, much, much. Until we can, until we can have lunch or coffee or drinks. This is, this is, uh, we’re on the, we’re on the path, we’re on the path, yeah. What did you say? By the beach? I said by the beach. Yeah, come on down. Yes, you, you, yes, sounds good. Um. All right, so you have an expertise in helping people build personal brand, and you encourage nonprofit leaders. To build their own personal brand. What’s the, what’s the advantage for the person being a thought leader and what’s the advantage for the nonprofit to have a leader who’s Out as a thought leader in the field. Right, well, there’s so many advantages. I mean, the list, the list is long, but I’ll, I’ll touch on a few that I think your audience will definitely resonate with, right, Tony? So, so one, I think there’s no doubt that it’s a human thing. It’s a human connection, right? So when somebody is a thought leader and they’re saying why they care about their mission, this is not just another job for them. That they care about this and they tie it back to their own story and they remind the audience on whatever platform you choose to be on. About why you really support and care about this mission, why you joined forces behind it, it does something different to the audience. It makes them say, 00, like it wakes them up, right? Um, and look, there are some major nonprofits where, you know, it still behooves them to have a thought leader who’s out there. But for the other 95%, I’d say double time because nobody knows your nonprofit enough, you know, that you want them to know about. About it, um, or you’re trying to break into different sectors or support networks that are gonna send you grants or uh funders that are going to support you, you know, we had, um, it just comes to mind we had someone who was like 0% visibility and when she started to step out, not only was she invited to speak on stages on behalf of the nonprofit, you know, not only was she, um, then recognized as a thought leader. And able to have more impact and more attendees inside of her program. She also got grant funding that she did not expect, right? Because they wanted to support what she was about. And she made it very clear the connection, and this is where I think most people don’t do it, Tony, is they don’t connect the dots, right? They’re not connecting why they decided to start or join as a leader of the organization and continue that story and share different threads of that story. And so one is just massive visibility and impact. So most nonprofit leaders wanna have impact. If you wanna have impact, you gotta stop by hiding yourself and get out there, start speaking about it. If you’re not speaking online, you better be. Speaking in person, right? You’ve got to be doing the things beyond what I see is like your little kind of bubble, right? Beyond the bubble that you and your predecessors probably did. That’s how you get more national and global reach. Is it, uh, I will say this, and I, and I think it’s important to say, is this an overnight thing? No. It’s not an overnight thing. And I think that’s like very important because a lot of people want the overnight success. This is a building, and you’ve got to be committed to the build and the consistency. How do we overcome the concern? Let’s, let’s take a, I love that you invoked the other 95%. Thank you. There, there are, there are listeners dear, dear to me, dear to nonprofits. Thank you for, thank you for channeling them, um. How do we overcome the fear that the CEO of the, of the smaller mid-sized nonprofit has that People are gonna think I’m using the, the charity. Like, I’m using the good name that we have in the community for my own personal aggrandizement. And, and, you know, we do good work, like you were saying, you know, in the, in the bubble in our community. But, but now I wanna, now BOFA is suggesting I go like national or, you know, whatever, international through LinkedIn or whatever. But, but I feel like people are gonna think I’m just like exploiting. Our nonprofit that I love leading for my own personal like ego vanity project. How do we get people past that? Yeah, well, we know, we know, right, valid concerns, but it’s a mindset. You know, if you ask anyone who stepped out of visibility, has one person asked you if you are exploiting the nonprofit for your own personal gain by becoming more visible. You’ll say, no, actually, we got an extra $500,000 or a million dollars grant that popped out of nowhere. You know, you, no one’s saying it. That’s the reality is none of my clients have ever had somebody say it. It’s a mindset. It’s in your head. Now, I’m not dismissing that. That’s why it’s a valid concern. I’m not dismissing that somebody would feel that. I think that’s a, that’s a, that’s a natural question, you know. And so part of it is having a discussion with yourself and saying, and I put a post about this a while ago, but like, is the vision for this nonprofit or where you want to take it, is it bigger than that discomfort, that fear, that mindset? Because if you can really put that vision and make it huge, oh, we want to raise this much, or we want to impact this many students or whatever the nonprofit’s about, then you start to say, What would happen if I played bigger? Me, personally, what would happen if I played bigger? And I tell people, well, give it a year, year and a half. You don’t have anything coming through that, like nothing. Nobody giving you a little extra, nothing happening, no more students. OK. And your, your mind was right, you know, fine, right? But that’s, it just doesn’t happen like that. It just doesn’t, it doesn’t happen. Have you had a client that that happened to, like they worked, they, they went at this for a year and a half, and then they saw no, no, no change, no change. I’ve never had that happen because there’s just too many avenues that I can’t even predict where there will be change. There will be change in how you’re pulled into speaking engagements. There’ll be, uh, change even with your board, right? Let, let’s not neglect them too in this conversation. You can have that, that question and say, hey, look guys, I’m looking to, to branch out more invisibility. And here are some of the benefits of doing so that I think will bring our nonprofit and I wanna know if I, if I could just, you know, what are the chances that you would get behind this? You know, have the conversation and they’ll be like, yeah, we’ve mention others you’ve been seeing who’ve been doing this, who’ve been, whether they’ve been getting coached, consulted, or doing it internally, frankly, right? I think it’s a tough internal job because your communications team is really not assigned to personal branding. So I think that you add something to their plate, but that’s another conversation for another day. So, you know, if you ask your board simply. You know, what are the chances you’d support this? I’ve been seeing others do this, and I think there might be something to it. Can we give it a shot for a year, year and a half, see where it takes us. And I guarantee, if your board members have a pulse of what’s happening in the business world, they’ll understand that you’ve got to do personal branding. It’s no longer an option. It’s, it’s just not, you know, thought leaders who are out there are winning. And, and I’ll, I’ll say this too, their nonprofit may not be as great as yours. Their nonprofit may not be as strong, it may not have as, as, as strong as a system as yours. It may not have as much impact. Guess what? The thought leaders out there, so it. It kind of doesn’t matter. Sometimes it’s just who’s out there. And I didn’t make up the rules. So don’t kill me, right? So like, that’s just the way it is. They’re, they’re out there. And if you see successful nonprofits, I’m talking about the ones who started in the past 5 to 8 years, when I’m not talking about legacy. Because I do think sometimes that’s different because they’ve had all these years of building a support network, OK? And they have changing leadership. But I’m talking about 5 to 8 years, you know, somebody started a nonprofit and who’s having massive success, guarantee they’re doing personal branding. Because you can’t do it any other way in this day and age and have massive success. It’s just really hard, yeah. And isn’t a lot of it the, the messaging too? I mean, when you’re out there, you’re not just talking about me, you’re talking about the, the community that we work in, you know, whether it’s animals or the environment or domestic violence or, you know, whatever, whatever our cause is, we’re, we’re. We’re, we’re, we’re putting ourselves out there, but we’re also sharing the message of that work and the work that our nonprofit does in our community, right? I mean, so, so another, like another way of overcoming the fear is, it’s all, it’s all in just the messaging. Like it’s not gonna be 100% about. Me and my family and my children and my animals and, and my vacations and, and my luxury we’re not gonna be having you pose in front of Bentleys and, and on yachts, you know, in, in, in scantily clad on Caribbean beaches. That’s not what, that’s, we’re not talking about you becoming an online influencer. We’re talking about you becoming a thought leader in your within. your work and your community, right? That’s right, right. Exactly. And, and so what that boils down to is brand awareness. What you’re really building is brand awareness. And you, the thought leader, you’re an extension of that, right? Uh, so you’re an extension of that, that organization. So, so when we say we’re stepping out in visibility, that’s a good question, Tony, and it’s like a thought process that you had, you know, what do we mean? Well, it means that you’re talking about your expertise, you’re sharing your, your perspective, right? You’re sharing your, your take on domestic violence, let’s say, or your take on whatever nonprofit you, you know, niche you’re in. And you’re sharing your perspective in a way, you’re sharing information, and you’re making people care beyond a statistic, right? So you, you might be telling, like, for example, one LinkedIn post might be talking about your connection to the nonprofit in your childhood and how there’s some type of connection and we weave it together. But the next post might be totally talking about the, the students you impact. And telling one of their stories, right? So it’s not all about, like you said, it’s not all about the thought leader, but it is stepping out and saying, I’m going to be sharing this message 10x. And board members and my network that I’m sending my newsletter to in my community. I, I would love for you to get behind this. I’m stepping out and I think it’s a very vulnerable and brave move to say, I’m stepping out this year. I actually think that’s a great starter to say, look, I am, most of the nonprofit leaders that I have met are naturally introverted or they think they are, and that is what they will hold a stake in the ground to for why they haven’t stepped out in visibility. And they’ll say like, I’m introverted. It’s just not my thing. And I’m like, well, how much do you care about, you know, 2xing or 3xing your revenue next year? Because that’s what’s at stake, your, your label of introvert and not dismissing that that’s true for them. But, but is that gonna be the thing when you are looking back at your nonprofit in 15 years and you’re thinking, did I have the most impact I could have? Are you OK that you called yourself an introvert to hold yourself back? Because that’s all it is, is a label and a mindset. And again, not dismissing that they might be, but is that going to be the thing that holds you back? Like you, like I’m asking, like the thought leaders on your, in your audience to really ask themselves, like, is that going to be your thing when you look back at your legacy, like, man, I could have really played bigger. And I, and I know people who wait 3 to 5 years before taking that leap, but they’re so glad they took the leap because they’re like, you know, I needed to at least try. I needed to, to attempt to do this because this is actually bigger than me. Like the nonprofit, the mission, everything is bigger than me. So why wouldn’t I go out there and at least try to step out and visibility more? And if you’re shy about speaking on a stage, well, don’t start at the stage, right? Go, go where you’re confident. I’m like, OK, if, if writing is easier, go with writing. If video is easier, go with, go with the medium that’s easier for you. And just start. The problem is, is what’s really hard, Tony, is the consistency. That’s what’s OK. Well, well, I was gonna ask you about how to start. You, you kind of, you kind of tease that like find your, like find your favorite, you know, don’t, you don’t have to, you don’t have to, like you said, go on stage if you’re not comfortable going on stage. You might get there. You might get there in 6 months or a year, but, but, all right, so like choose a channel, uh, a, a, a, a method, uh, that suits you, right, that, because you’re already. You’re already busting out of your comfort zone, so you have to, you don’t have to double, double that with the stage fright that you’re gonna invoke or if you don’t like doing webinars, then, you know, then do audio podcasts, maybe, maybe that, you know, that’s right, or LinkedIn or all the, that’s right, get your confidence, do the small thing, do the small thing to get your confidence going, right? So do the small thing like take the baby step and, and as you become more comfortable, you’ll say, oh, actually I do. I want to go on podcasts, or actually, I do want to do this. You’ll see that you’ll see that natural evolution of self, right? Um, and so, so first thing is, is I would say, if you’re not on LinkedIn, that’s where you want to be. That’s where decision makers are. That’s where a lot of the people who you’re connecting with in person. I will not go to an in-person event without taking that pamphlet that everyone throws away, and making sure that I connect with every single person who’s in that pamphlet. So you’ve got to be doing some of those, those basic networking steps. We’re talking about if you’re in-person networking, they’re gonna forget you if they’re not following you. Even if you had a great conversation, unless you said, I’m having a meeting with you and you’re doing that, but let’s be honest, usually that might be two people you’re walking out with saying that. What about the rest of the room? So, you know, you want to make sure that you’re, you’re, you’re networking in person, you’re, you’re taking that list, and you’re making sure you’re asking the event organizer for it, and you’re making sure that you’re connecting with them on LinkedIn. Now you’ve got a fan base. Because you’re, you’re adding fans, somebody who’s gonna support, not everyone’s gonna be a client or a donor, but they might be a fan, right? And we dismiss the fans sometimes, right? So, so allow people who might just support you to be part of your LinkedIn network. So make sure you’re doing those simple things. If you are not networking in person right now, like. Some people might not be, that’s OK. OK, that’s fine. Then make sure that you’re adding 100 people a week or more on your LinkedIn, that are your target audience or going to support you. So you have to be doing something to get new eyeballs. Everyone talks about content and we can get to that. But first things first is, are you, are you actually allowing people to come into your space and are you proactively adding them? So, so I think that’s something that’s missed, which is why I’m talking about it off top, right? Yeah, no, this is the consistency that you, you were, you touched on earlier. You have to keep up like a, a, a, a drumbeat of your, that’s, that’s pretty ambitious. I love, I love it. 100, 100 new connect connection requests per, per week, right? And you can, and you can. Mention if you met them in person, Tony, say it like great meeting you at the da da da conference. Um, I’m sorry we didn’t get a chance to connect, but I saw you on LinkedIn. I’d love to support your, your, your content here, right? Just something simple, nothing too aggressive, right? Just something real cool, right? OK, so, so that’s just what I call that just, I just wanna drop a little footnote there for, for listeners. Zoe. So now to do that, you’re gonna, you’re gonna have to invest in the LinkedIn Pro. You know, you’re not gonna be able to send any messages. That many connection requests with the free LinkedIn, which, which is fine. So you know, you gotta invest a little money. It’s, I don’t know, it’s like $100 a month or something, or yeah, it might even be less than that. I think it’s like $70 a month. OK, so just, you know, not a big deal, not a big deal, but just alerting you, you know, they’ll say, oh, I, I’m, I reached my $5 a week or whatever, whatever, 5 a month limit. You just gotta, just a little, you know, not, not a, not to dissuade you, but you gotta put a little money in to be able to send that volume of, of connection requests, but The value comes as you, as you build your, your, your followers or your, your connections or you know, you, you fans, um, OK, so just, uh, just that’s a little footnote. So good footnote, and I’ll add to that LinkedIn’s always changing things, so don’t, we’re not gonna be quoted here, right? So like it could be 150 next week. LinkedIn’s always changing. We don’t know exactly. I, I don’t know, yeah, yeah, yeah. So just tell everybody, yeah, that’s that’s a valuable channel. Uh, we’ve had other guests and one within the past week or two. Sort of allude, well, explicitly talk a lot about what you just alluded to that LinkedIn is really underutilized as a, as a connection tool, as a networking tool for nonprofits, for, for just building relationships. That’s right. That’s right. That’s right. So, so, so that’s, so that’s one thing you want to be adding. To your network right before you’re adding to your network, I would make sure your profile, your headline is strong, it’s relevant, it’s current. It’s saying what you do in one sentence, but the headline gives you a ton of space, as you know, too, Tony, right? So I’m referring to the area right below somebody’s name. And so a lot of times people put nonprofit leader like let’s get specific on who we help and and and how we help them and you can say that in one sentence, right? Um, you know, we help so and so so they can, right? So if you really are stuck you could always use something like that so they can have more impact so they can. And, um, you know, uh, graduate school within 4 years, whatever it might be, so, so they can as a quick one, quick win, but we wanna get specific. You can put nonprofit leader after that, and I would get more specific, executive director, founder, be specific on exactly what it is you do. If you have awards. If you’re a keynote speaker as well, um, sought after, dynamic, get those adjectives going because if you want, if you want an Emmy Award, if you want an Edward R. Murrow Award, sure, put that in, put that in. This is not the time to be shy, basically is what I’m saying, OK, like don’t be shy in your headlines because when people are looking for you. Or somebody who helps your uh organization they’re going inside of the search and they might be putting something in, you know, so they might, they might be putting dome I’m just gonna go domestic violence because we were talking about that that’s in my brain right now, but like domestic violence leader in Orange County, right? So that might that because what if they’re doing a conference and they’re looking for a speaker, they might say speaker on domestic violence and they’re putting these in the headlines. So you want your profile to say that so that you pop up. So make sure you’re location specific, get the basics down, right? And, and if you wanna be known as a speaker, make sure you have speaker throughout your entire profile. If you want to be known as a thought leader, say that throughout. So you want keywords throughout. And, and so your mission, whatever the keywords are for your mission. Like, let’s say it’s nonprofit radio, you would want to say like, you know, nonprofit radio podcast as many times throughout your entire profile because you wanna be, be sought after maybe for that, right? So it just depends on what you want to be known as, which is a great question is what do you want to be known as? Think of that as you build your whole LinkedIn profile. I’ll start there. Valuable. So I love the, I love the tactics. I love the tactics, like things we can do, you know, I can start tomorrow evaluating what, what do I want to be known as and does my LinkedIn profile convey that. That’s right. That’s right throughout. And you make the point throughout, not just, not just in your headline. Yes, even in your resume, like everything matters. So even if your resume is, you know, you’ve been at this organization for 5 years, but what about all the other ones, you know, did you speak there? So if you wanted to be known as a speaker, you’d be putting speaker keynotes. Or through those previous um jobs that you were in, right? Um, skills, all those things, you just want to make a robust profile. There’s even a media section. If you’ve been in any media, you could literally add media to it. So just get that profile full before you start adding people because once people you’re adding people, they’re gonna do a quick look at who you are, and they’re not gonna accept you if they feel like. You’re not gonna add to their network, so you just wanna show up as your best self is what I tell folks like put your best self, spend a really good amount of time on that LinkedIn profile. Sure, you could have your comms team also kind of kick it back with you if you have a coms team, um, or, or higher external, whatever, whatever makes sense for you and where you are, but get that profile good. Then the next thing you wanna do is think about your content. I think it’s important that you think of your content in, in themes, right? So, maybe you’ll do a personal story, and then another one might be a thought leader story. Um, so I, I think it’s important not to stay in one thing, um, because then we sound the same and, and people are attracted to diverse thought. They’re, so when they look at thought leaders. They like a funny post every once in a while. Like, don’t be so serious that you’re, you know, it’s like we can’t, we can’t joke with you. We don’t see your personality. It’s not funny, right? A little, a little humanity, you know, like school, first day of school. Uh, you know, a, a proud graduation moment, uh, uh, you know, maybe it is even vacation because, you know, you’re, you’re thinking about self-care this week, you know, but that, that’s, you’re right, we would like to, we like to see the humanity in a little personality, yeah, and a little personality, you know, so if you’re like the, the, the, the funny. Dad, you know, let me see that, you know, uh, not every post because we’re, it’s a, it’s a, it’s a business essentially. But no, you know, then no, right? So, so very distinct from Facebook, right? I say like we’re not sharing what we ate for dinner, you know, that’s very Facebook. So, um, I said everyone just keep that in mind, right, when we say personality. Um, but, but you want to be changing up the post, then you might want to think about a case study of a, of a, of somebody impacted. So if you serve students or you serve the homeless population, can you share a case study? And if you have a photo or video, even better. Keep your videos under 45 seconds, OK? Because longer than that, a lot of view times drop off. It doesn’t get as much. So keep that under 45 seconds per video. And look, raw videos are also really good too. A lot of people want to make it beautiful, but don’t, I tell people like, again, what you said earlier, like, you just need a quick win sometimes. So don’t get over your head. I need to hire an editor tomorrow. No, quick video, quick video, quick hits. I’m all for something. I did something at my dining room table last week. Like just do, do it because we all know time can be limited sometimes, right? So just the, the goal is to get you in the motion and the energy of I’m gonna show up, right? And I think if you could show up 2 times a week at the beginning and then move to 3 times a week, is really good. If all you could do is 1 post a week next week, then do the one post. It doesn’t need to be a Pulitzer Prize, folks, right? But it just needs to be something that’s. That’s informative or persuasive or compelling in some way. And so that’s why you, you could, you could steal something that I said at the beginning and just say like I have not been visible. I’ve been 0% visibility on LinkedIn, and this year it’s gonna change. I’m trying to make a difference and try to make a difference, right? And, and you could start with something like that just to, to get people to wake up and pay attention. But if you do that, Tony, don’t lose, don’t hurt your brand by then not showing up. Don’t wait a month. You can’t have every post can’t start. Every post can’t start with an apology. I’m sorry, I haven’t been here for 6 weeks. You know, that’s, that, that you do have, well, that’s the consistency going back to what you said, you know, and even if you can only do 1 a week in the beginning and then step it up to 2. A week, uh, you know, and then some, maybe some outside appearances as well if you’re comfortable doing the, the in-person type work or podcasts. But yeah, you know, start, really, I mean, really, your message is just start, start. If it’s once a week, if it’s once a week, that’s more than you’ve been doing. Yes, exactly. So start, start, you know, I wanna talk a little about, uh, BOAFTA because this is amazing. Like, Emmy, what, what, you’re a, you’re a, you’re a professional journalist, obviously you won, you won an Edward R. Murrow Award. What, what, what’s your, what, what brought you to journalism? Not, not, not to the brand work. What brought you to journalism and storytelling? What you question. I haven’t even asked that in a long time, Tony. Um, yeah, yeah. So, um. You know, I think I was a kid, I always was drawn to stories and storytelling and writing. So I always knew that I enjoyed the writing process. Like it could be songs, it could be anything, it could be poems, like I enjoyed writing. Um, and then, you know, my, my, did you used to record yourself ever and listen to yourself like? a little tape recorder. I, I had a tape recorder and I was, I think I would listen to myself, maybe trying to like bust a note, like a singer, sing a song or something, right? So, yeah, yeah, yeah. So, yeah, I would. And when I feel like I’m dating myself here, but once like VHS like video cameras got smaller and smaller, my girlfriend and I, my childhood friend would like. You know, videotape ourselves for random things. So we, we, it’s like I enjoyed this because, because I used to do that with a cassette recorder. So, I’m going even further back. I used to listen to myself like pretend DJ, uh, on a, on a little, little cassette recorder. So you’re not dating yourself you are podcast. But no, but tell you, no, no, no, no, but tell your, I wanna hear about BFA. Oh, yeah, yeah. So, so, so I think I had um and then my parents, both Ethiopian immigrants who came here in the late 60s, early 70s, and, and we would always watch 60 Minutes, we would always watch it on Sunday nights. And I remember thinking, it’s so cool that they can show up on the scene and know exactly what’s going on. Like I, it felt, I don’t know if the word magical is the right word. I’ve never described it like that. But there was something that I was, uh, that captured my attention with that, you know, and so. Um, I would just see them in different, you know, locations or reporters, and it was just so cool. And they were so fluid. And I was like, how does this all, how does this all come together? I think I was just really in awe, right? And so, um, and so I, you know, um, you know, went to college and at the University of Maryland, and I did a lot of internships. It was hard for me to find my first job. I majored in communications. I, um, I applied to more than 100 TV stations before I got my first job. Yeah, and I, I mean back then you were sending in a VHS tape and you were mailing it in. So I was just doing that and I was working odd-end jobs, you know, waiting tables, whatever have you to make ends meet while I was applying and it took like a year and a half, Tony. I mean, I talk to students now. I’m like, oh, you think, oh, you applied to 5 places and you’re, you’re throwing in the towel. I was like, what? I mean, I was just, I was hungry, you know, I was you, who gave you your first shot? Where’d you get your first journalism job? Well, I did an internship after college for free. OK, 2 hours away. And I say for free because all these kids are like, if you ever, if you have a kid, let them listen to this because I’m telling you, nobody wants to work for free. And I’m like, look, that’s what I did. So after college, For free. I did an internship. I thought I was going to get the job. I was like, oh, I’ve got this in the bag. You know, I’ve been there 2 months. I was commuting back and forth from Maryland to Virginia. And then the news director got fired, left, who knows? And I was like, oh my goodness. But here’s what happened. The anchor there had seen me working my tail off and just said, hey, you know, what if, What if, what if there was a job in Georgia? Would you be willing to move to Georgia? Because that’s where my first job was, and I could connect you with the news director. Long story short, that ended up being my first job. Um, and I, yeah, and I, and it was, and it was $15,000 a year. That anchor, that anchor in, in Virginia, Melanie believed in you. Melanie believed in me. Melanie believed in me. Melanie was helping me with my resume tape that summer. Um, Melanie, I think, understood how hard it could be. Um, and yeah, she just, she extended the olive branch like I’m gonna help you, you know, and I, I, Melanie Lofton, and, um. She’s since left the business and and everything, but she, she really helped me. And so, um, and I’ll tell you that I wanted that job so badly that I, I told the news director in Georgia that, and I’ve done this a couple of times. I told him that I was going to be in town to visit friends. And I flew out there, drove 2 hours to Dalton, Georgia, small town of 40,000. And I met him just so I would be like top of the stack when a job was available because jobs was not available. So 8 months later, Call me back and he’s like, do you want the job still? Are you still available? I was like, Yes, I am. Even that, so that that was 8 months in your 1.5 job search, still scratching together odds and ends jobs, trying to, trying to, trying to pull it together. I was hustling. That’s I was hustling great. That’s a good darn story. That’s very good. All right, so that doesn’t know till this day, by the way, I think that I, I like literally flew out there just to like, hey, just so you meet me and I’m at the top of the stack. But anyways, but yeah, good story, good, good story. It’s time for Tony’s take 2. Thank you, Kate. I had a moment of vulnerability not too long ago. I’m writing this book, Planned Giving Accelerated, and I. Spent 9 months writing the manuscript. 55,000 words. And as I was writing, It was a conversation between me and the reader. That’s it. I was sitting, typing. Thinking about reader questions, channeling what they might challenge, what, what they might like to know in addition to, you know, what I’m, what I’m writing, what, what more should I be adding. It’s just between me and the reader. That’s it, for 9 months. Just the two of us. And then the next stage after I finished the manuscript. Uh, I sent it to 9 different, uh, beta readers. And these are folks who read your book, they may not read all of it, they read parts of it or all of it. And they scrutinize it. They challenge it. They question it. And that felt very vulnerable because for 9 months it was just me and the readers. Readers. I hope, I hope there’s more than 1 reader, I hope more than 1 person buys the book. Let’s assume 2 or more will buy the book, so it’ll be just me and the readers. But really, I’m thinking of one person, you know, I’m, I’m, I’m thinking of just having a conversation with a person. And then all of a sudden, these other 9 people jump in and they start, you know, I’m asking them. I, I recruited them. It’s, it’s an essential part of writing a book is to get it beta read. So it’s not like, uh, they were imposed on me. I invited them in. I need their help. I need feedback. But it’s, uh, it felt a little fearful, a little vulnerable. Because 9 months I was with this thing all alone. And then other people start. Hopefully not tearing it apart, but Giving their input, giving their input, which is, again, it’s an essential part of writing a book, but just sharing how it felt at that moment of emailing those. 55,000 words to, to folks. And, and the feedback is, uh, starting to come in. Uh, it’s, uh, it’s early, very early, but Pretty, pretty, uh, pretty positive actually. Folks, uh, some folks are laughing. That’s good. That’s good. It’s a light, it’s a light read. I would say, is it light? Is it a light read? It’s a light-hearted book, put it that way. Light read makes it sound like it’s, you know, kind of like beach fiction for, uh, you know, for the summertime. It’s not like that. But there is a good amount of humor in it. So, thanks for just, you know, just wanted to share that. Vulnerability, vulnerable feeling, letting others into your work after 9 months. And that is Tony’s take 2. Kate, congratulations on taking the next step. Thank you. Thank you very much. It is a big step. Thank you. Not many people can say that they’ve, or they’re working on publishing a book, but then when you get to that point, you can say, I’ve published a book. I’m gonna get there in September. Thank you. Yep, that’s the publication, September date. We’ve got Beu but loads more time. Here’s the rest of grow your personal brand and your nonprofit with Bota Yamm. What did you win the Emmy Award for? Where were you? Where were you then? I went, OK, so I worked in several markets and then I was in Memphis, Tennessee, and um there was a woman who um had gone through, nearly died, I will say she had been brutally raped. She had, she, her, the convicted rapist was in jail. Um, but there was a loophole in the law that she found out he was getting out early based on like good credit. And she’s like, how does somebody who almost killed me. Um, raped me, get out of jail early on good behavior, right? And so we found this loophole in the law. And, uh, you know, I give it up to Kimberly because she shared her story, which is the only reason why this was, this was not going to help her case, but it was going to help those beyond. Um and so, um, And with that, you know, she, um, she shared her story. A lawmaker found out about what we were working on, that we worked with that lawmaker to close a loophole in the law for sadly the next victim. But, but at least, you know, with Kimberly sharing her story and getting the support, we were able to do some good. Yeah. And what station were you at when you got that, uh, WHBQ in Memphis, Tennessee. Memphis, Tennessee. Congratulations. That’s a, you know, you notice how you, you notice how you like, you, you become, you talk a little softer when you’re recalling that. Like you, you know, like you’re a little reflective, you know, it’s traumatic. I felt for her, you know, and I think anyone watching would have felt for her. I mean, it’s just her life was upended and changed forever because of that. And so. Uh, she’s a survivor. I mean, that’s, she’s, she’s she’s a survivor, a beautiful girl. So I, I say it because I, it’s, you know, you win an award for that, and then you think of her story. And so it’s it’s hard, you know, it’s hard sometimes to, it’s an interesting position. How about the Edward R. Murrow Award? What was that for? Um, so that was wild because, um, A senator had a news conference, and look, senators have news conferences, as we know all the time, and I’m right outside DC, but this was in Macon, Georgia, so small town. And I was a one man band reporter, which is you shoot, edit, and then show up on camera. So you do the whole, now they call it multimedia journalists because they, they, they fancied up the word, but it is usually you’re like carrying your camera, filming yourself, you’re doing the whole nine by yourself, no videographer. And so, I was a one man band reporter. And I was at the news conference. And like, I used to wear sneakers to work every day because I just felt like I was always running, you know, and carrying equipment, right? Because I wasn’t in fancy heels. I was shooting this conference. And um, And the, the, the senator had very odd behavior. It’s like he held a 3 minute news conference and he walked out and right, it was just very odd. Like, what’s going on? And he was really upset and he pushed the photographer from another from a from a newspaper out of the way, like knocked him over, um, or his, his bodyguard, excuse me, did. And um, I’m trying to recollect it because this is like 15 years ago, and or 1010 years ago. And anyways, I pursued the, I pursued the bodyguard and was like, asking him on camera, like, why did you just do that? So he just knocked over. Yeah, that’s what he did. It was the bodyguard. He just like knocked over that um. That that uh newspaper photographer. And so it was just, again, it was just this really odd, you know, it becomes a regular day, regular news conference. So I pursued him, kept filming, kept asking questions, and it was all very breaking news. I want breaking news. Um, the video went viral. I was interviewed in like Atlanta for it. And um we followed up with the senator. I mean, it was just, it just was an ongoing story. Like I said, it was wild. It was bizarre. And um, And they had the video to then press charges on that bodyguard because I had kept filming and I had filmed the actual assault. So like the assault took place in front of me and I just kept going. So just I kept carrying my camera. So, so that was the, um, that was the breaking news story that I won that mural for. Yeah, you had the instinct to think about that. I had the instinct like this is weird. Why would this is weird and what is going on? And this is wild and just. And everyone was like, Weren’t you scared he might come for you? For some reason, I just, you just in the moment. I was like, no, not really. I don’t know why, but he certainly could have just knocked me over too, you know, with a little hand as a bodyguard. So, and I don’t really know why he had a bodyguard or his, it was his nephew, I believe, at a news conference anyway, like I said, the whole thing was bizarre. Who was the senator was bizarre? Oh my goodness. Now you’re, oh my goodness. Because you’re asking me, I forget. Uh, it’s all right. It was a senator. It was, it was a US senator from Georgia. Yes, uh, yeah, well, it was a state senator. It was a state, state senator, OK, it was state senator, state senator. He has since passed. He has since passed 90%. This is again a while ago, um, and did you remember his name? Yeah. Did you ever find out why they left the news conference so abruptly? They, they gave us just a generic statement like, no, you know, it was just, it wasn’t really um. Yeah, this was back in like probably 2011. They gave us a generic statement. Yeah, it was a generic statement. It makes me curious. Yeah, well, you’re a good interviewer. Yeah, you’re right. Yeah, they just gave a generic, generic statement and the whole thing was bizarre. I mean, they just, and then they didn’t want they want to answer our questions afterwards, you know, so it was just, it was wild. Yeah. And then how come you left journalism to, did you go from journalism to having your own business to being an entrepreneur? I did I did. What, what was, what was behind that shift? That’s a big. It is a big shift. It was a big move because I clearly had sacrificed a lot, right? So I, I’ve done a lot to get wherever I was. And I think there was just a push inside of me that wanted to. Play bigger. Like, I think what I tell nonprofit leaders to do and for-profit leaders to do, it’s like I, there was a, it was part of me that, yes, I was speaking to thousands of people on camera, but I think by that time I was in Pittsburgh. And I was anchoring and reporting, but I, there was something that I wanted. KDKA, were you with KDKA? No, I was WTAE. Are you familiar? Yeah, OK. I went to, I went to Carnegie Mellon. That’s where I got my undergrad, Pittsburgh. So, uh, KDK, sorry, KDK is the only one I remember, but, um, yeah, the, the only station east of the Mississippi with a K because it was, because it was one of the, it was the first station, it was one of the first stations. They let them because all the stations east of the Mississippi have W. You know, W W A B C W E T A, etc. but KDKA, they let them keep the K east of the Mississippi because they were maybe the first TV station. I didn’t know something, yeah, but west of the Mississippi is all the K’s except for, except for KDKA. All right, yeah, fun fact, fun fact. OK, if you were, I remember W W E T, no, W T W T A E WTAE is the ABC station there and so I was there for almost 5 years and um. And so I, I think I just felt this pull that I wanted to, to try and do my own thing. I wanted to build my own thing. Um, I still freelance, you know, occasionally for the NBC National News in DC. I’m right outside DC. Yeah, so sometimes I’ll pop up on TV, but I’m, I’m really fully in the business. I just, I like it. I, I like being able to dip my toe in. And I also enjoy what I do in my own business and speaking. I do a lot of workshops, um, but. I think for me, it was this pull to do something bigger and to do something different. And I, um, I couldn’t ignore it. I don’t know if anyone’s felt that way who’s listening, but it’s just like I couldn’t, I couldn’t ignore the poll. And I said, well, at least I’ve got to try it. And if it, you know, works out, it works out. If it doesn’t, you go back, it was fine. I left on good terms. But I just felt, I felt like I was playing small. You know, I felt like I was playing small. I wanted to speak globally. I wanted to just do different things. And It’s, it’s hard if you’re working full time for someone, you know, it’s hard. Sure, sure. Well, now you encourage, now you encourage others to take the step that you took to not, not, not play small, get out outside your comfort zone, right? Be, be comfortable outside the envelope. Yes, yes. And, and look, we all have, every time you want to go to a new level, like there are things I think about doing, and I’m like, oh, am I ready for that, you know, everyone has. You know, different levels of where they are, because if you’re, if you’re growing, then there’s part of you that wants to expand and do different things. And I think that, you know, I think about, OK, well, what’s next for me too, right? So that’s all of us. I think that’s, that’s, that’s all everyone thinks that you’ve got it all together just because you’re, you know, doing different things and doing them pretty well, right? But, but, If you’re evolving, there’s a part of you that’s like, what’s next for me? You know, what, what does this still resonate with me? Am I still happy doing this? Does this still have impact, right? And I think those are good questions. You know, so basically, I’m saying I don’t have it all figured out either. But the part I do, I figured out, I’d like to share, you know, so. So that’s perfect. So let’s, let’s talk more about, uh, the, the personal branding. But thank you for the, both the yam interlude. I like to, I like to know, I like to know about people. I think listeners like to know about people. I agree. I agree. It was, uh, it, it was a good flashback. I had to reflect and really think back. I’m like, oh yeah, yeah, it’s fun. Thank you. Thanks for flashing back with us. So what, what more would you like to say? We got, we got, uh, some time together still. What, what, what haven’t we talked about around? Around this work, uh, you go like a quarter in the slot. Go ahead. Yeah, look, um, I think the first thing that people think about is, am I gonna do this or is someone gonna do this for me? And is it gonna be my comms team? And I, I, I think I touched on it earlier, but if we have time, I’ll touch on it here. You know, your comms team is usually already overloaded. Um, and they are focused on the organization’s brand and distinction might be a comms person. That is true too. I should say that. Yeah, that that is true too. And so they’re already feeling from maybe writing the newsletters and doing the socials, they’re already handling the organization’s voice. And it’s important to make a distinction that your brand is different than the organization’s. And I think a lot of people are like, wasn’t the same thing? It’s like, no, it’s it’s two different things. You could be an extension of it, but it is two different things. And so, And knowing that when you have somebody handling the organization’s voice and the personal brand voice, it can get tricky. Um, it, it can get tricky because it’s a lot to manage. Also, um, the personal branding is a beast on its own. You wanna be thinking about you on stages, who’s gonna edit that video, if you’re going to, but how are you going to essentially handle the inner workings of getting your brand out there? And I think it’s an undertaking that people underestimate until they try to do it themselves. And when they try to do it themselves, they really enjoy it. And I think there’s a a small percentage, but they actually enjoy the writing and the doing of it, and they’re really good at it because they really own it and they want to do it and they feel confident. Most, I would say, need some support and need some help. In crafting what their story threads are going to be. Um, and I like to tell people that one way, that this is a tip, really, so get out your pens, is if you’re stuck on how to tie in your story to back to, um, Your mission Think of transformational moments. So when you went from this to that, you know, so it could be, it could be from journalism to entrepreneurship, for instance, right, exactly, from $15,000 a year to X amount of dollars a year, from being a one-man band reporter to having a whole team doing a documentary. Like, so think of the transformation, because there’s a lot that happened. I mean, I probably have 10 more stories I could share, right? Or 20, like there’s a lot that happens in the in between. But I want you to think about the transformational moments going from this to that. And you’ll often see this, like, this is a good way for you to think about it when you read the bios of authors on the back. And it’s for inspirational authors. You know, so Iyanla Vanzant went from single mom to Oprah’s to being having her own show on Oprah, you know, right, so, or from a domestic violence survivor to that. She did a lot of things, but she focuses on one or two to go from this to that, right? And she’s like a spiritual leader who’s out there. Um, a celebrity, a quasi celebrity. What’s her name? What’s her name again? Iyanla Vanzant. She just popped in my head because I saw a commercial before I got on this show, this show, like on IG. So, so this is what happens, right? My, you know, look, it’s brand awareness, I guess she’s doing, yeah, she’s doing it. Yeah, she’s doing it. But if you look on the good ways or you look on a podcast, you know, somebody went from this to Mel Robbins, a lot of people know Mel Robbins, the podcast. Host, right, who’s done, I think she’s the number one podcast in the world or something. She, she went from, you know, being $800,000 in debt with a pizza shop with her husband, to now having the number one podcast, right, from this to that, you know, so, so thinking of your own transformational moments, I think is really big. Um, so that’s a place for people to start writing now. Write down 20 transformational moments that you’ve got maybe 10 of those that you might want to make publicly stories. Not everything needs to be shared out loud, right? So, so, so, so I think that that’s a way. So imagine, so I go back to the comms team. Imagine your comms team trying to help you with this. It’s just a lot, right? It’s a lot. They’re, they’re like, what transformational moments we’re focused on the organization. So I think it’s, you either have to own it yourself, maybe have a really good, Team behind you, not just one person. Thanks for pointing that out, Tony. The team behind you or you externally, you know, you know, you hire outside and you figure that out and you see if the board can support that whatever way you go. See if the board will get behind you too, because the board might say, I have somebody who could maybe sponsor that, or maybe there’s unrestricted grant dollars, right? Just people can get creative when you start to tell them what you’re doctoring up and what you’re dreaming up. Um, one client got a 2 year grant to work with us, right? But she, she kept us like on her list. And she’s like, I’m working on this grant, we get this grant, I can use it for this, as long as I tie it to this, great. I’m like, OK, cool. So people find ways once they’re committed, and they’re like, OK, I definitely want to do this. People find ways. Um, others just get funders maybe to support it, or their their organization is doing better as their visibility goes up too. Um, and, and look, some people, Tony, I think it’s important to mention, never want, but I don’t mention their names, because they They don’t want anyone to know that we’re ghostwriting for them. They, they want to hold it close to their chest, and I respect that. So yeah, you’re not supposed, yeah, if you give up their names, that would, that defeats the point of ghostwriting. Yeah, yeah. Well, some, some, some don’t care. Some are like, that’s fine. They’ll talk about us, and they’ll, they, they don’t, they’re like, yeah, they help us. Like, OK, you know, CEOs get help all the time with their speeches, like whatever, you know, it’s like they see it as that, you know, like, like a CEO getting help with a speech. They don’t see it as being disingenuous. But I, I say that to say, so there’s some, if I say too much specific information, it would give away someone. So I’m just, I’m playing very general right now. So what I’m saying intentionally to protect them. Um, go ahead. You had a question. Yeah, I want to, uh, I want to close with the, uh, with the big ass calendar behind you. OK. What’s that about? You, when we, before we started off, off mic, you, uh, you said big ass calendar is a thing. I don’t, I don’t know about the thing. So to me, the boxes are very small. It looks like a whole year. Uh, it’s like a little 1 by 1 inch by or 1 1.5 by 2-inch boxes. What do you do with this big ass calendar? Right. So, um, this is by Jesse Itzler. I may be botching his last name, um. So, he’s an entrepreneur who talks about, like, if you want to have a really exciting life, you’ve got to make sure you’re intentional behind it. And so he has a whole um calendar that he created and all the boxes and there’s these stickers and I’m about. 2 months of what I’m going to be planning on doing. So you really plan out your whole year. So I have to sit and plan out my whole year. And what it is, is you, um, you pick. Um, an activity that you normally wouldn’t do, but that would be for yourself. A lot of people have kids and they do things all the time for their kids. This is about like, if he’s like, if you can’t take every 6 weeks, 1 day to do something for yourself, that you normally wouldn’t do. Then you’ve got to fix that. Like you should be doing something for yourself. So not to say you won’t also do things for your kids, but this is about intention for self. OK. So, and, and look, I might be misquoting him, but I’m going to give you all the the brief version. OK, they’re both the version. So, so, so, let’s say, so last year, I took like a pottery barn, a pottery making class, because I was like, I’ve never done that before. It’s right up my street. And I’ve been curious about it. I’ve been like, oh, I want to sign up for this pottery class. So I took a 2 hour pottery class. That’s the thing I would normally do. It was my like small activity every 6 weeks. Then he also has a daily habit every quarter to implement. So that daily habit every, every day would be maybe just to drink an extra glass of water. Maybe it’s to walk 15 minutes, maybe it’s to move for 15 minutes, but it’s some type of daily habit, and every quarter, you’re compounding. So if it’s a 15 minute walk, maybe next quarter it’s 8 glasses of water. Now you’re doing 8 glasses of water plus the 15. So each quarter you’re, you’re adding to it, OK? So you’ve got your daily habit, you’ve got your every 6 weeks, and then. I think it’s every, and then I can’t remember how many times a year, but you’re doing like, um, That it’s called a uh. Every 3 months, I think you do like an actual thing thing that would be even bigger. So, um, it would be like, um, I’ve never gone hiking, and so I want to go hiking. So he has this whole formula. But the big thing is that this will be the year of that when I look back, it will be the year I launched a podcast, went on podcasts, and it’s called a misogi. And then the misogi is that big thing that you’re gonna look back on. Maybe it’s you cleared your debt, maybe you bought a new home, maybe it’s you um. Went on a trip to Japan. It’s the year. So you, when you look back on that year, you should remember it as the year that I did that thing. So, so he has 2 or 3 things that I just described that are all part of this big ass calendar and so there’s stickers and now I see you have multi, you have multicolored stickers. You got yellow, orange, purple, red. Do those mean different things to you, the red, I assume the red, the red are birthdays. The orange are my like, uh, every six week activities, um, and then yellow is travel, but I haven’t filled it all out yet. No, I can see it’s just it looks like you got it last April or May. You got looks like you. Last entry is maybe June. Yeah, a little travel in June coming, like 3 day travel in June. 4 days I have traveled before that. 3 or 4 stickers there. All right, yeah, you’re working and my monthly um move goal, my, my daily thing, my daily habit right now is like I must, I sprained my, I fractured actually my ankle, um, late this fall. And so I just got out of physical therapy. So my thing is now 15 minutes of movement every day to get this ankle back up. What I want to do is more, but I say 15. You know what I take away from this? You, you, you practice what you preach. You encourage people to go outside their comfort, uh, zone, outside the, outside the, the envelope of security, and every, whatever, every 6 weeks you do something for yourself, or every, and every 3 months you do something that you’ve never done before. So. Both the yam practicing what you preach. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate it. It was so fun to be on here and I love the questions. So it got, it got me thinking. It got me thinking. I’m gonna Google the senator because I now it’s bothering me that I remember his name, man. Oh, Senator Brown. There it is. Sorry, Senator Brown, Georgia. All right, what year was that? What year was that Edward R. Murrow Award? 20, I, I’ll tell you right now. Hold on, 2011, 2011, 2011, yeah, yeah, yeah, it’s, you know, you do so many, honestly, you do so many stories that I don’t like to, to say just the ones I got awards for because I really, I really believe like a lot of stories were even more some powerful and compelling, but Sometimes those are what gets, you know, what gets recognized as out of my um purview, right? But there were a lot of stories where people shared a lot of beautiful things that invited me in their home, and I, I don’t take that lightly. I think that’s, um. It’s, it was, it was, um, it was gratifying, you know, it was beautiful. So I admire journalism. Uh, uh, if I hadn’t gone to law school, my, my second choice was to go to a master’s degree in journalism. I, I admire the work of journalists. It’s essential for our country. I, I, I feel badly that they’re, that they’re marginalized and, and it’s criticized so unfairly, I think. Uh, I just, I admire, I admire the field. So thank you for doing that work. Thank you. Thank you. Both to ya mom. You’ll find her company at Story Lead. Now, it’s L E D E, the lead, like the introduction to a, a, a piece that would draw you in. Storylead.com. You need to connect with BFA on LinkedIn, uh, and you’ll, you’ll find both of us active together often. Botha, thank you very much. Pleasure. Thank you, Tony. Really appreciate it. Thank you. Next week, systems and processes so your people thrive. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you, find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martinetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.
Kayla Meyers: Bring Fun To Evaluation & Impact Data
Kayla Meyers reveals the fun in what may sound dull, through braids, data galleries and data escape rooms. She distinguishes between outputs, outcomes and impact, and explains the disconnect between traditional evaluation and the impact measurement we need in today’s environment. She helps you recognize common evaluation challenges and sets you up to overcome them. Kayla is the founder of Bridgepoint Evaluation.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host, and I’m the pod father of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer the effects of aspergillosis. If you inflamed me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, to give you the highlights. Hey Tony, here’s what’s up. Bring fun to evaluation and impact data. Kayla Meyers reveals the fun in what may sound dull, through braids, data galleries, and data escape rooms. She distinguishes between outputs, outcomes and impact, and explains the disconnect between traditional evaluation and the impact measurement we need in today’s environment. She helps you recognize common evaluation challenges and sets you up to overcome them. Kayla is the founder of Bridgepoint Evaluation. On Tony’s take 2. They need your opinion. Here is bring fun to evaluation and impact data. It’s my pleasure to welcome Kayla Meyers to nonprofit Radio. Kayla is the founder of Bridgepoint Evaluation. Through training, coaching, and hands-on evaluation support, she guides organizations in designing practical, action-oriented evaluations. She’s an adjunct professor teaching program evaluation and survey design. The company is at bridgepointevaluation.com. And you’ll find Kayla on LinkedIn. Welcome to Nonprofit Radio, Kayla. Hi, Tony, thank you so much for having me. It’s so fun to be here. Uh, it is fun. Thank you. I’m glad you, I’m glad you’re having fun already and we haven’t even started. That’s outstanding. All right, I love, thank you for bringing that. Thank you for bringing that energy. OK, evaluation, like impact measurement, um, these things get like nonprofits, I think, I fear get intimidated, uh, plus they sound boring, although essential. Help us, help allay like fears of intimidation and boredom. Yeah, absolutely. So I think sometimes, uh, when folks think about evaluation, they think about auditing, they think about compliance, they think about proving their impact in a way that’s going to be deemed enough. Um, whereas when we talk about evaluation over at Bridgepoint evaluation, we focus on improving and learning and growing. Um, and then also having a, a strong basis for making decisions confidently, for having a shared understanding amongst your entire organization, and so really just trying to flip the script a little bit on why we do evaluation, acknowledging that demonstrating our impact is only one piece of why we go about evaluation and learning versus thinking about evaluation as an auditing and compliance mechanism. OK, and for decision making, as you mentioned. So, you know, can we, can we humanize this process? Yeah, yeah, absolutely, I think, I think that’s, that’s doable, that’s achievable. Absolutely. And, and I think sometimes when we think about evaluation, we think about numbers, we think about how many people accomplished what and how do I make sure those numbers are as big as possible. I see all the times nonprofits. Saying we’re going to reach 1000 people, 1 million people, and what gets lost is that human moment, exactly. And so I think a grounding ourselves and getting back there is so important. OK, and we’re gonna talk about, you know, going from 1000 to a million, you know, that’s not gonna happen in 6 months or even in a year, but you want to celebrate the steps reaching, reaching. We’ll, we’ll we’ll get to the, the, you know, the, the incremental nature that you ought to celebrate. Um, I feel like we should distinguish at, uh, near the beginning here between outcomes and impact. Can you, you know, make that clear for us? Yeah, absolutely. And so you can think about this. The easiest framework to think about this, in my opinion, is to think about the logic model, which I know I just said logic model, and then people just like turn off their ears, and they’re like, never mind. No, no, we’re giving you a chance. No, no, not yet. It hasn’t happened yet. Maybe at the 5 minute mark, but not, not the, not the 3:40 mark. No, we’re, you’re OK. All right, no, so just think about it instead of like an outcomes chain. Um, so. We host this training to what? To, to achieve what outcome. Um, so you can think about outputs, which is how many people attended the training, but then what happened to those people in the training? What do those people do immediately after the training? Those are your short term outcomes, then you start building out that train, right? So people learned um how to be financially healthy, they learned how to budget. And now the next outcomes on that train are things like, they tried budgeting out. Um, once they tried budgeting out, they were able to better align their income with their expenditures. Once they got that, you know, kind of just working through that chain and really thinking about that overarching chain, what it results in, so we’re talking about a financial health program, what it Results in is the impact, the result there being that folks have the financial stability and the financial wellness to be able to have increased decision making, increased resiliency, and increased ability for, um, social movement, for financial movement within their lives. It’s an impact. All the things that come before that are outcomes. OK, thank you. And outputs too. You added outputs too. Thank you. All right, cool, cool. Um, so you believe there’s a disconnect between traditional evaluation and the impact measurement that you want to be talking about, that you want, you want, you’re encouraging folks to do, you encourage clients to do. So help us see how the old model is, uh, not, uh, not so good. I don’t know. Not, the old model is not new. The old model is not current. That’s why it’s old. Share the, share the, the, the, the differences here, where, where we, where we are versus where we used to be. Yeah, absolutely. And I think this is, you know, this is truly why Bridgepoint evaluation exists. Um, I have been an evaluation consultant for almost 15 years now, and much of my early career was spent on these really big 3-year, 5-year projects, um, huge budgets coming in from the federal government or research institutions, and then at the same time, I’d be working with nonprofits, medium size, um, large size, but even some smaller, smaller size nonprofits. Who are being held to very similar standards as those, you know, large, huge consulting opportunities. And so what I, what I wanna bring together is the, the two, bridge across those words, right, across those worlds, so that’s look how fancy you’re bridge, Bridgepoint, you’re bridging. Yeah, bridging those worlds. Oh, absolutely brilliant, brilliant bridge point. OK. Right. And so, and so you’re often seeing, um, these large studies of demonstrating impact, proving impact, and, and instead, I want to work with organizations to reduce uncertainty and make better decisions with their data. So it’s about improving your impact, not necessarily. Improving it, but improving it, um, and just generally kind of trying to take some of the tools from that impact measurement world and translate them into your in-house nonprofit of staff who wear 3 to 5 hats, of perhaps folks doing impact measurement who maybe didn’t have, uh, necessarily, um, formal training on that, but they grew into that role and they’re fantastic at that role. So how do we support them even more? Let’s talk more about the decision-making that you mentioned earlier. You know, maybe, I don’t know, maybe you have a story about how a, a nonprofit used data in decision making, but I, I’ll put you on the spot. If you don’t, that’s OK, you know, but, but help us see the, the value in, in clearer decisions. Yeah, absolutely, um, and so I think it can be, it can come from a few different reasons, but I, I do have one example in particular working with a client, like many organizations, they had all in-person programming. COVID happened. They had all virtual programming, and now they’re moving forward, and they want to know the best direction. What is the, what, how can they bring together all of those resources they just put into virtual programming, a high, high demand for their services. And their love for in-person programming. And so what we did was we used program evaluation to answer that exact question. What is working well about virtual programming? What’s maybe not so working? What was their work? What, what, what kind of programming were they doing? Yeah, they do, um, financial coaching, um, as well as, um, sorry, financial coaching and Uh, education, financial education, coaching, um, and so, so they have kind of, you know, this, this whole course that they typically do in person, then they shifted it all virtual. Now they’re kind of in a blended approach, and they’re saying, well, if we continue virtual, we could rapidly expand. And geographically, and that’s not just a self-serving thing, but folks all through the world could use financial education and coaching, especially when we’re talking about closing the homeownership gap, um, for people of color compared to, to white people. And so, um, they brought me in, they brought in our team, and they said, how do we go about this? How do we, how do we kind of design an evaluation for this purpose? So we brought everything together, we looked at the quantitative, we looked at um the organizational data, we looked at operational data, and then we also looked at things like test scores, surveys, things of that nature, attendance scores, and also brought in the qualitative. So trying to kind of get the how, what, um, output side of things with the why, and so what qualitative side of things. Bringing all this together to highlight where my virtual programming maybe have some shortfalls, and how can you kind of close those gaps based on what your stakeholders are telling you, and where is there incredible opportunity for virtual programming? How can that, um, how can that be coupled perhaps with satellite offices or something like that, something of that nature, to be able to expand your reach and really change the way that you’re able to do your work? It sounds like a lot of that work was surveying. It was, honestly, what we, what we really leaned into was operational data, existing operational data, which this is gonna be something you hear me repeat. Let’s use what you have, you probably have some great stuff. Um, and then, and then focus groups and uh collaborative evaluation layered on top of it. So I worked with their entire staff. To have consistent learning workshops. I think, again, trying to get, trying to get to that cultural change of evaluation isn’t an audit, it’s not a test, it is a learning opportunity, it’s a, it’s a cultural change, um, and, and kind of coming together to look at the numbers and then match them with interviews and focus groups to add more context and depth. Focus groups. So you, you, uh, facilitate focus groups. Is that facilitate, moderate? I don’t know what it’s called. What, what is it, facilitate, facilitate focus groups. Yeah, OK. Um, how do you, uh, how do you get people at ease? This is something I always wondered, uh, in a focus group now, so that was a program around financial literacy. Um, how do you get people to open up about, you know, maybe where they started before the, before. Working with the, with this nonprofit, you know, that, that they were, I mean, They were essentially saying I was financially illiterate because I’m in a financial literacy program. Like how do you get people to open up, not just about that, but, uh, about, you know, the, not talking about money. Like people would rather talk about death or go to the dentist, I think, than, than talk about money. How do you get people to open up in that kind of, in a, in a group setting? Oh yeah, you are like nail on the head there because it is so hard to even recruit people to come to that setting, let alone open up the door $50 gift cards or I don’t know what, but yes, uh, yes, exactly, um, yeah, so definitely compensating people for their time and expertise, sharing food, breaking bread. I mean trying to understand like what are things that generally are going to Provide comfort and then I think really flipping the script a little bit, right? So, talking to folks about we are navigating a broken system, an intentionally broken system. There’s a system in place that seeks to hold this information back from you, that it tries to hold communities down, especially when it comes to financial wealth and power. And you are here as experts within your community, right? You are here as people with lived expertise, community expertise, network expertise, and that’s what we’re gonna talk about. So what we’re actually gonna talk about in this focus group is how you as experts in the room, see this program lifting up those around you. What are the ways in which you See it lifting people up in which you see it perhaps letting people fall through the cracks, which is something the organization really wants to reconcile with. How do we, how do we build some safety nets in there? And how can we all that work together to kind of overcome this systemic effort, um, so really, you know, kind of de-individualizing every single component of it and saying we’re not here to necessarily talk about you. But you as an expert, right, in all of these different areas and how you can help us, um, really have a reciprocal exchange of information about this. That’s excellent. So you, you, it’s an appeal to community, that you can, you can help us help the community if you’re, if, if, if you share, if you’re, if you’re honest and plus you mean that that’s, uh, I think that, I think most people do want to help the community. Uh, Especially when they were helped by the program. Like they wanna, they want others, it’s almost empowering. I can help, I can help, I can help this group help others if I, you know, if I help them. Um, plus you mentioned meals. I happen to, I’m, I’m writing a book, uh, it’s on planned giving fundraising, but I have something, I, I love shared meals. I mean, I, I do, so I do plan giving, fundraising consulting, so I do a lot of individual like donor and prospect meetings. I love over a meal. You said breaking bread, you know, sharing a meal. I even, I even created a, an acronym like meal. Meals expertly allow learning. Oh, I love that. I know, I just, you know, it’s just something like cute for the book, but, but, but it does, you know, the shared space, the shared, you, you know, you, you like you’re at a communal table with the focus group, right before, I assume this is before or maybe even during their eating. People are literally sharing that physical space of the table, and they’re sharing the food. Yeah, that’s a metaphor for what you want them to do. You want them to share. It is, it’s perfect. So there’s all of those layers, right? And then there’s just this really basic layer, Tony, which I’m sure you’ve seen, where it lets people kind of crack their voice a little bit, right? So they get in the room and you’re nervous and you’re like, kind of, why am I here? But then, we’re not gonna talk about that first. We’re gonna talk about like, isn’t, aren’t these ribs amazing? Isn’t this burrito bowl incredible? And just start talking and just warm up our voices. Warm up our, our relationship with one another, much more smooth sailing than just getting in the room and saying, here’s the consent language, let’s go. Yeah, yeah, right, right, right. Were, were they beef ribs or pork ribs? Pork. OK, um, I live in North Carolina. It’s gotta be pork ribs, but I think Texas, Texas, I think is the beef, well, Midwest generally beef, more beef ribs, but, uh, yeah, pork ribs. Did you have pulled pork too or just the ribs? We did all sorts of good meals. Um, we did, we did see some pulled pork at the corn, and that was the thing too. We revealed, we told the folks the menu in advance, and then we had all these women making cornbread and so then we’re talking about cornbread recipes. I mean, it’s just a, it, and I’ll note here, the focus group’s long. If you haven’t caught on, the focus groups not a short. Endeavor because we got to show up, we got to make our plates, we got to talk, we got to share this cornbread recipe, and then we’re gonna get into it. I love that. I love people came with their homemade cornbread. Outstanding and then they’re sharing the recipes. Oh no, I use canned corn. No, no, you got to use fresh. No, canned corn is better. No, OK, no, I love that. All right, sorry, sorry. Um. So, all right, how do we overcome the, these, these challenges? I mean, how do we like sort of get nuts and bolts, you know, start to, like, what should we be thinking about or, you know, if we, even if we don’t have a, suppose we’re not even a grant recipient, but we do want better data. We wanna, like you’re saying, we have the data, but we need to, we need to coalesce our data so that it can help us. Maybe it’s not even for a third party. Maybe it is just for our own purposes. Uh, what do we need to like think about? I don’t know, culturally, leadership-wise. You know, I like, I like steps, uh, if we can, and you know, I’m not that you have to say 12345, but, you know, I like steps that people, takeaways. I like takeaways that people can take action on or at least start thinking about. Absolutely, and I think about it as a framework, right? Because we try it out. It’s just a general idea, um, and I do a lot of this, so like I said, I do a lot of coaching, uh, which is more about one on one coaching, as well as fractional management. So if you just need someone to come in and kind of help your team, you know, navigate this real sea change in evaluation culture, we can come in and kind of manage that for you, um, and, and, you know, leave, leave you kind of with that. Uh, learning system in place. And so what that tends to look like is we start off with an inventory of what you have, what’s already going well, what do you already, um, answer in terms of what data, data points you have, where you have interest, where you have staff interest, and really bringing people together in that identification, because on one hand, yes, your team’s, you know, filling out those spreadsheets. On the other hand, What you might not have a finger on the pulse of, is that your country manager is always having lunch with um their main volunteer, and is kind of always doing a bit of a pulse check in terms of how things are going with them. That’s data. Formalizing that is the challenge. So we start off with just this inventory, what do you already have in your pocket? Then we start to think about what are the strategic questions that are going to guide learning. So, they might ask, you know, to what extent are we achieving our outcomes, with whom, for whom, under what circumstances. And they’re gonna examine the process by which you do that, the appropriateness of that process, the relevance of that process. So we’re just gonna put together those questions, we’re gonna then put everything on a grid, right? So we’re gonna take those questions, we’re gonna put those across the top, we’re gonna take all of your data sources, all of the work that you’re doing, put that in rows, and identify where you have overlap, where we’re answering those questions with the data we’re already collecting. And examine it through the lens of breadth and depth. So breadth is participation counts. It’s the number of people you reach, the number of activities you you were saying before, the outputs. Exactly. Bread is going to tell you how far your work is going. And then depth. So then we’re gonna look for depth. How are we going to hear about stories of what that actually looks like on the ground, um, as well as perhaps case studies of how this one person, like, really went all in on the 4 programs we offer and changed her life in 9 months, like, really. Really changed her whole, her whole way of operating. Those are our depth stories. That is usually where we need to turn things up a little bit. So, we go through this table, we look at this, those are all depth measures, these are breadth measures, and here’s where we need to kind of add in some new tools, or maybe just add in questions on the tools we already have. Get all of that in place, we talk about a reasonable implementation timeline, reasonable being key, if it’s not reasonable, it will break and it will fall apart. Um, But then the most important part that I think tends to get forgotten is when are we going to have our learning moments? When are we gonna come back together? Is it gonna be quarterly? Is it gonna be monthly dashboards and then quarterly conversations? But really kind of reorienting ourselves again, how are we going to learn? When are we going to learn? In what ways are we’re going to learn? And that learning tends to look the same as that. Focus group I just talked about. We’re gonna get together, we’re gonna set aside enough time to have a meal, to talk, and to get out of our daily routines so that we can really come and think strategically about our work. And what can we incrementally look for to celebrate little, little moments, whether, you know, it’s a monthly dashboard or a monthly meeting, a quarterly meeting, whatever it is, you know, like what, what movement. In our, in our, in this data formalizing process, can we, can we see incrementally? Yeah, and one of my, uh, one of my fractional management clients was such a great exemplar of this, because within the first two months, we got together, we identified their data systems, and we found key quick changes. One of those changes was we moved from one spreadsheet. Um, that wasn’t linked to anything, it wasn’t talking to anything else, right? They were having to work really hard on their data. We replaced it with a form that spoke directly to a dashboard. And so now their data is working for them. And within 3 months, we changed the way their team meetings were structured. So instead of each of their program managers coming together and trying to remember, oh, in the last month, we held this training, I think there were 30 people there, um, yeah, it felt like a success. People weren’t that engaged to doing these kind of like report outs to instead opening up their team meeting and Having their dashboard and having different program managers be like, Whoa, you had 100 people come to that workshop? What on earth happened? And they were like, Oh, right. I found this nurse who works in churches, and she told everyone about our workshop, and all of them came. And just having like these really amazing learning moments that changed when we stopped making people work so hard on their data and started making our data work so hard for them. It’s time for Tony’s take 2. Thank you, Kate. Someone needs your opinion. Uh, the, it’s a, it’s a former guest. She’s been on a few times, uh, Karen Graham. Very smart uh data scientist, a tech person in the nonprofit community, and she is leading a donor management software study. So she wants to get information about how you use your CRM or even if you don’t have a CRM what you, what you do in place of that, just everything around your, your donor management software. So I’m helping her to encourage you to participate in the study. Uh, N10 is also involved. They’re also, I think Karen’s leading it, but N10 is helping fund it. So, you know, how closely we partner with N10. Amy Sample Ward, of course, being our tech contributor. She’s the CEO of N10, and of course, I bring the podcast to N10’s conference each year. This year we’ll be going to Detroit in March. So, helping Karen, helping N10. I would ask you to participate in the study. If you go to my LinkedIn this week, you will see, uh, just check the posts, and I will have posted, uh, I have posted about it this week. Uh, and the link to participate in the study will be, will be there. It’ll be, uh, in my comment. So that’s it. So I hope you can help out Karen, help out N10. By participating in the, in their donor management software study. I thank you very much. And that is Tony’s take too. Kate, Kate, like my voice just cracked. Thank you. Like I’m 14. I was gonna say something and now I forgot, cause now I just wanted to make, I wanna make fun of you for your, your voice crack, but. Whatever I had, it was good, but I’m sure you were going to encourage listeners to participate in the study in the study, yes, please go participate in the study, um. Kate We’ve got booco butt loads more time. Here’s the rest of Bring fun to evaluation and Impact data with Kayla Meyers. You teach, um, program evaluation, survey design. Where, where is, where is that you teach? Yeah, the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota. Oh, Hubert named, they gotta be named for Hubert Humphrey, the senator from Minnesota who ran for president in, I don’t know what election, presidential election, Hubert Humphrey, right? Yeah, yeah, you got it. Um, so what’s that like? What, uh, do students need a, a, a, a, well, let me ask you, uh, uh, jump all around. You got a lackluster host. I’m sorry. Do you, do you have a background in, I don’t know, mathematics or data design, data analysis, data design, computer science, or you like Spanish, Spanish and music major? What, uh, I, I, so this is, uh, and this speaks to how I ended up in my career. I am a generalist with a generalist training, so I got a degree, an interdisciplinary degree in development. Um, so, economic development, community development, etc. where I took a different, uh, every semester I was taking different classes in College of Health, College of Natural Resource Management, um, because I was like, well, I love all of this. I love the intersection of how all of these systems work together. And then, uh, got a mixed methods, had a mixed methods focus, so I was taking qualitative analysis classes alongside my statistics classes and policy analysis classes, um, and I, I am a graduate of the Humphrey School of Public Affairs, so I got to come back, uh, almost a decade later to then teach the exact classes that were the inspiration for my career. That’s outstanding. You’re teaching the classes that were the inspiration for your career. I love that. And, uh, do you find, uh, a lot of interdisciplinary or like self-defined majors in, in your classes? I think, you know, uh, the biggest degree program at the Humphrey School is the Masters of Public Policy, which is inherently, you know, allows itself to really be customized quite nicely. Um, but then we also do have students from, you know, the business school, from the education school, we’re kind of converging into this one space. We, I really teach the class, um, because it’s at the, at the public affairs school with a lens to policy, um, and a lens to public affairs. Work. Um, so, you know, if you take an evaluation class at an education institution, they’re really gonna focus on evaluation and education, or the public health school, it’s really gonna focus on uh like health evaluation. But mine is really looking, um, a little bit more both broadly and focused on um public face. programs, so how the uh programs that are intended to really help the public, how do we evaluate those and really measure that, especially because most of the time the public is interfacing with much more than just one program. They’re, they’re interfacing with all sorts of different nonprofits. Uh, do you teach at all, uh, in person, or is it, or is it all virtual? You’re doing it in person, all in person, which is fantastic. That’s excellent. Yeah. So now what is that like? Are you looking at a sea of laptop screen, you know, the back of laptop screens? Is that how, is that how students in college take notes? Um, you know, I, like when you look up, you see a bunch of like Apple and Dell and Lenovo logos and, and glowing eyeballs because their screens are lit up. Is that what you see or what? I’ll give them credit. Their laptops usually have some great funny stickers on them, so I do get that. Um, the class is 3 hours long, and so we only do lecture for about 45 minutes, and then we, we switch it up. We do a lot of applied learning, a lot of, um, a lot of group work, a lot of, you know, facilitated discussion. I’m, I’m trained in technology of participation and art of hosting, and I bring a lot of that into the classroom because I don’t just want them to learn the concepts of evaluation, I want them to learn how to facilitate an evaluation. And so, I will use a lot of times facilitation methods, but I just want them to learn by having them go through it. So we host world cafe conversations where they then get to learn, like, this is a world cafe conversation, this is why you use it, this is when you use it, great. Now we’re gonna use it to talk about how to apply this learning. You said you’re trained in technology and participation. Is that participation, the technology of participation. What you, I think you just gave an example of it. What, what does that mean generally, the tech the technology of participation. Yeah, and I, this was the, I think it was designed by a group. It’s ICCA, um, International Culture, I’m gonna forget their acronym. It’s basically putting together neuroscience and facilitation. So how do we, you know, overlay what neuroscience tells us about how people think and process information with how we how we help them navigate a conversation. One specific example that, and then your listeners can look this up and use it for their next conversation. Is the OID framework. So the arid framework O O R ID. Yes, thank you, O R ID observation, reflection, interpretation, decision making. OK, so we’re gonna start off when we bring a group together. Perhaps we have a data dashboard, right? This is something I, I will often use whenever we’re, um, coming together over some data. We’ll start off with just what do you see? What stands out to you? Or you have questions. What’s surprising? What’s not surprising? We don’t have to ask all these questions, but these are all observational questions. Interpretation. What, um, what seems, wait, what was the R? Wait, the O was observation. What was the R? Skip the R, yeah, you went from O to I. OK, oid, it’s no good. You can’t, you can’t redo the oid into oid. OK. Reflection. What, what, what are we reflecting on? Reflecting, um, what, what stands out to you, what feels critical, what feels uh desired, what feels undesired, right? So just reflecting, like, how are we, how are we feeling? So what do we see, how do we feel about it? Interpret, what does it mean for us? Why, what feels of most importance? What feels of most importance for external communications? What feels of most importance for decision making? Where do we need to dive deeper? So, interpreting that information. So, here’s what I see, here’s how I’m feeling about it, here’s what I think I need to do about it, and then decision-making. So, what’s, what’s most important for us to carry forward the next steps? What next steps are we seeing here? Who needs to be involved in the next conversation? So where do we go from here? All right, cool. Thank you. Taking a little digression into uh technology and, and. Wait, what do you, techno, I just lost the word participation, participation, technology of participation. Thank you. Um. Well, so what about, you know, we can, we can talk about some of the tools. I don’t know, are there, are there tools that folks can use, or, or, or is everything, I don’t know, proprietary to Bridgepoint or like are there, are there tools that we, that we can offer resources? Yeah, absolutely, and, and I truly, I’m in this work because I want folks to take on evaluation. So I can tell, like you’re, you’re passionate about, about evaluation and, and program management, measurement, and no, it’s, it’s, it’s moving, like you’re moving. Your, your passion is, uh, is convinced, I’m, I’m, I’m feeling it. What’s the word I’m looking, it’s uh, yes, it’s palpable. Um, our tagline is we turn data into stories and so can you. That’s the first phrase you’ll see when you open up our website, cause that’s what we believe. And so, I often work with folks to think about a data braid. So when you bring everyone together, and sometimes when I like to bring a lot of tactical work, um, into, into my conversations and so, and so if we show up together in person, we might pull together some yarn and, and start actually braiding together pieces. But think about your data braid that your organization is pulling together. The strands are going to be qualitative. They’re gonna be stories, they’re gonna be um those mission moments that really bring your team together, that they say, I was just talking to this one participant and gosh, I just, I, I was re-energized, I’m ready to go. They’re going to be your quantitative measures. Maybe you have some pre-post survey or some pre-post test scores. Maybe you have um some confidence measures. Those different quantitative measures. Um, as well as your operational data. So, you’re looking at number of people coming to your trainings, number of trainings worked. These are all different strands within your data braid. And what you, first thing that you wanna do is make sure that those strands are equal, right? So if you have a data braid, and one strand is a string and another is a thick piece of yarn, How do we kind of change that up to make it a little bit more balanced, to make sure that we’re properly pairing things like pre-post test scores with qualitative stories that help us understand why the change in test score is important. Um, I often work in food systems. So, working, you know, whether that be with the regional food supplier or aggregator, right? So thinking about those agricultural producers who bring together all these different products and, and provide them in a CSA or provide them to local schools. Um, so, I work on that side of things as well as the food shelf, food distribution, food bank side. And a lot of times what we hear is the number of grocery bags sent home with students on a Friday, right? So, the idea here being that, that all of us can assume is that now this family has a meal for Saturday, which is really vital when we’re talking about students and making sure families are fed cause those 5 days a week is so important for families. What we don’t hear is why that is so important. And so when we start talking to participants and we hear them say, well, actually, I matched it with some of the food I already had in my cupboard, and we went to my mom’s house, and my kids were able to have time with their grandparents, interacting. I was able to check on my parents and see how they’re doing, and Groceries were taken care of, I wouldn’t have been able to feed all of these people had it not been for some of the supplemental food. And that resonates with people. People get that. That is why people want to do this work. Right now it’s grandchildren with their grandparents, and, and there can be a bountiful meal. Yeah, right. And so that’s the grade, right? Like we just put these pieces together to really tell a holistic story of what your organization is doing and how it’s, and how it’s going about doing that. Cause what we also heard in this is that she didn’t necessarily have enough to feed all of, are they all her dependents, right? Is she, is she a caretaker for her, for her parents there? And so we can start digging into that too, and saying like, hmm. I’m hearing this amazing thing, and maybe we can expand our definition of dependence in our next intake survey and hear from folks, like, is it more than just the people in your household that you’re, that you’re providing meals with, that way we can adjust the, the amount of food that we’re sending home with you. All right, Kayla, what else, what else can you share in the second part of your mission that, and, and you can too. So the braid is excellent. The braid is excellent. I love, I love the metaphor of the braid equal, you know, because if you have a ball and a strand, your braid is gonna be, you know, well fecacta. It’s gonna be messed up. Uh, it’s not, it’s gonna be weak. It’s not, it’s a, it’s not gonna be symmetric. So that’s a, that’s, that’s a terrific metaphor. What else for the, uh, and, and you can too part. Yeah, I think, you know, really thinking about how to bring your team together for collaborative learning. Um, and so, and so I kind of brought some of this up, but a lot of what we do is grounded in fun. Um, so I, I actually took a lot of trainings in youth-based evaluation, and so we’re learning about theater exercises and play-based exercises. And my main takeaway was like, grown-ups love having fun. Why aren’t we trying this out? Um, and so, So, some of the things that we do is we do data gallery walks where we, um, we bring everyone together and set it up almost as an art gallery of charts and quotes and, um, and different, you know, tables and just invite people to walk through it like a gallery, right? Where some folks are gonna be silent observers, they’re gonna be reflecting, other folks are gonna be having quiet conversations to help say, like, what are you seeing here? I’m seeing this. What do you think? Um, and then facilitating a large group conversation. So, all to say, how are you learning? How are you collaboratively using the information to bring it to life, to tell the story of what’s happening, and help you learn the story of where to go next. The braid, the data gallery. You got one more. I love threes. Is there one more that you can, one more. OK, great. Here’s a, here’s another fun one, and I learned this from a colleague, um, a data escape room. This one is, is so fun if you, if you just want to get people together to be silly. Um, but take your data dashboard. So instead of that gallery where you put it all over the walls, put it on a dashboard, break into teams. I recommend shaking people up, right? So if you have a programs team, like shake them up, mix them all up, get them mixed up, right, right, right, yeah. Um, and now you’re going to start a timer and you’re gonna tell people, these are all clues that come together to tell a story, maybe 3 stories. You escape the data escape room when your team can cohesively tell a story. So you need to make sure there’s no gaps. You need to make sure all these data points are kind of coming together to help you. Understand the story that’s, that’s coming out here. And my students know this one because I do it in class and I, we always have a blast with it. Um, but it really helps people examine their information, examine their program data, examine their organizational data, and put it together with different quotes, with different case studies, um, with different test scores, things of that nature, and be able to then. And say, like, here’s a comprehensive interpretation of what I’m seeing, and here’s some things that are still a little bit of gaps for me. Like, here’s, here’s some things that I, I want to learn more, so I can really test and prove this. Um, and so we come back together and have a, have a large group discussion, and that’s where a lot of the learning and revealing new insights comes out. I love the data escape room. It’s so fun. Yeah, that’s, it does sound like fun. All right, all right. Um. What about, um, some, some challenges, like, you know, obstacles we, we’re likely, oh, you know what, before we get to the obstacles, and see, I told you, lackluster host, um, this sounds like we, this is, this is, this is a, uh, An endeavor that is gonna require, you know, leadership buy-in, right? I mean, you’ve got to get, because this is, this is gonna take some time. Um, folks are gonna come together, you know, even, even the quarterly meetings can be fun, it sounds like, but still, it’s taking time away. We, we need leadership buy-in for this initiative, right? Mhm, yeah, we do. We do, and I, and I think just keeping in mind we’re already spending that time, we’re already, we’re already doing these things, right? So when we are having staff all fill out their own unique spreadsheets and then we’re having a maybe a grants manager or someone take all of these spreadsheets and input them, like all this manual data entry, all of this, you know, kind of rote work that’s going in, that’s, it’s time already spent. I’m saying like, let’s take that, instead make it into a system where you’re not working so hard on your data, but your data is working much harder for you. And it, and revealing what it can do for you. So, you know, think back to that team meeting too, right, where we’re starting off our team meeting the 1st 20 minutes are folks trying to remember what on earth they did last week and think about things they can share with their colleagues. We’re gonna change that. We’re gonna instead make sure that our data is working harder. It’s in a better spreadsheet, it’s in a better dashboard, and we’re gonna have a much, our conversation’s gonna go much further. I love systems. I mean, I think they’re essential systems, processes, you know, the every, we have this, we have this cadence, but each time is not the first time we’ve done whatever it is we’re talking about. So let’s have a, let’s have a process so that it, it just becomes easy, it becomes natural, becomes routine instead of it being an event every time. Right, right, and that’s, and that’s, you know, something that we love to bring together, right? It’s like we are, we are the fun folks. We’re gonna come in and have a data escape room, and we’re gonna be able to convert your spreadsheets into Microsoft forms that go through Power Automate and show up in this really nice Power BI dashboard. Like, we are, we are nerds who can dig into those different things and still share a great meal and have fun, uh, at the, at the AO meeting. Can we have a glass of wine with the meeting, or? Absolutely, we’re always in. OK, OK. And I love you, you, you’re coming in like we’re, we’re the fun. We’re gonna have fun with data. Like people are like rolling their eyes. Yeah, I don’t think so, but I’m sure within the 1st 10 minutes or so, you, you change minds. Um, all right, so I was starting to ask you about, you know, obstacles we might see in our Data, our measurement and data analysis. Uh, flow, our, our, our process, what, you know, what are some common way, things we might see and how do we circumvent them? Yeah, I think one of the first challenges I often encounter journey, that was the word I was like, journey, journey. I tell you, lackluster host, I told you this, this journey that we’re on together, that’s what I meant to say. Yeah, all right, sorry. Yeah. No, you’re good. So the journey, so I think one of the biggest, um, obstacles on that journey is folks are gonna struggle with how much do I leave behind and how much do I, do I kind of retroactively fit. Um, so, for example, when we’re talking about a new way to enter in your data, right? That is going to give us a bit of a bump in the road in terms of, well, do we want to program all of our past data into this new dashboard, or are we just starting on day one and moving forward? That’s a really important conversation to have, to talk about the implications of either decision making, um, but we can, we can think about the ways that we can utilize your community, your volunteers to help us out with that backlog if we need to do that. Um, and, and that shows up in a lot of different ways, right? It’s kind of like, if we, if we refine and change our systems right now, how does that impact us in terms of having this longitudinal story, this longitudinal measure? It, it might, um, but at the end of the day, if you have a longitudinal story that doesn’t really represent your work, doesn’t go that deep, can’t tell you that much, how valuable is it, right? So, let, so let’s talk about setting up the framework for a longitudinal, uh, work moving forward. The other The other challenge that’s gonna come up is that um you’re gonna have funders who want different measures, and that is a pain point that a lot of organizations go through. Um, so, you know, any funder or any uh development team will tell you that getting in those diverse types of funding is really key. The challenge is that when you bring in all these different funders, they might have all their own reporting requirements. And so how do you build out a system, an evaluation system in which you can meet all of those requirements while still being proactive about your learning, your strategy, your decision making. Um, that’s where I think it can be really helpful to bring in, to bring in a team, because it’s a heavy load to lift at the front end. Once you have it figured out, you’re good to go. OK. Only 2? Only 2 obstacles, uh, to our journey? Those are the two that pretty much always come up. Um, yeah, those, those are the two that it’s just they’re, they’re just real challenges. They’re just in the world and, and I think, you know, staff. Staff feelings and staff sentiments kind of like you brought up when we started this, right? Like getting people to come to an evaluation workshop is like getting them to show up to algebra. Like no one wants to be there. Um, I actually had a participant come up to me after a recent workshop and she said, I’m, I want you to know that they made me come here kicking and screaming. I I brought out the entire book. I’m too busy, I’m sick, I’m this, and leadership said, please go. And now, I actually have tangible tools, right? Let’s, like, once we get out of this, um, oh, can we do, you know, a cross tap here? Can we do a T test there? People just gloss over it, right? They’re like, oh my gosh, let’s move that. Like, that, that doesn’t need to be. Something you have to worry yourself with is like, what is a T test? What is she talking about? But instead saying, here’s the results, here’s what this actually says. What we know is that the more times people come to our workshop, the better their savings account grows. That’s what the main takeaway is, that’s what I’m trying to tell you. And kind of get yourself away from some of that jargon, some of that. You know, just that middle school math feeling of like, oh my gosh, why is there a letter in this math equation? I don’t understand what’s going on. Um, and I say that as someone who, who did really struggle with, uh, with some of the, some of those math lessons, and so I, I understand where people are coming from. That’s a great place to wrap because it’s, it’s uplifting. Uh, T, you talk about T test. I took statistics for poets at, uh, Carnegie Mellon University. So, you know, what, uh, that’s, that, I recognize the phrase T test. All right, Kayla, professor, Professor Kayla Meyers, outstanding. Thank you. Founder of Bridgepoint Evaluation, the company is at bridgepointevaluation.com. And Kayla is on LinkedIn. Kayla, thank you so much. Thank you so much. This was fantastic. I’m glad. I think that it’s fun. You make data fun. I try. You’re succeeding. Now, a lot of people are trying. You’ve, you’ve, you’re, you, you’ve succeeded. Next week, grow your personal brand and your nonprofit. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you, find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martinetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.