Tag Archives: Amy Sample Ward

Nonprofit Radio for September 22, 2025: The State Of The Sector (Beginning With AI)

 

Gene Takagi & Amy Sample Ward: The State Of The Sector (Beginning With AI)

This year, any conversation about the nonprofit sector finds its way to Artificial Intelligence. So we start there, with our contributors Gene Takagi on legal and Amy Sample Ward on technology. Amy is concerned about our lack of security readiness and shares their Top 5 security must-haves. Gene explains your board’s duties around tech, budgeting and planning. They both see resilience as critical. Plus, a ton more. Gene is principal attorney at NEO Law Group and Amy is the CEO of NTEN.

Gene Takagi

Amy Sample Ward

 

 

 

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Hello, and my voice cracked. Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer the effects of chondrodermatitis, nodularis helicus. If I heard that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer Kate with what’s on the menu. Hello Tony. I hope it’s so funny. It’s that voice cracks like I’m 14. Hey, Tony, I hope our listeners are hungry. The state of the sector, beginning with AI. This year, any conversation about the nonprofit sector finds its way to artificial intelligence. So we start there with our contributors Gene Takagi on legal and Amy Sample Ward on technology. Amy is concerned about our lack of security readiness and shares their top five security must-haves. Gan explains your board’s duties around tech, budgeting and planning. They both see resilience as critical, plus a ton more. Jean is principal attorney at Neo Law Group, and Amy is the CEO of N10. On Tony’s take two. Tales from the gym. The cure for dry eyes. Here is the state of the sector, beginning with AI. It’s a pleasure to welcome back Gene Takagi and Amy Sample Ward, our contributors to nonprofit radio. Gene is our legal contributor and principal of NEO, the nonprofit and exempt organizations law group in San Francisco. He edits that wildly popular nonprofit law blog.com. The firm is at neolawgroup.com and he’s at GTech. Amy Sample Ward is our technology contributor and CEO of N10. They were awarded a 2023 Bosch Foundation fellowship and their most recent co-authored book is The Tech That Comes Next, about equity and inclusiveness in technology development. You’ll find them on Blue Sky as Amy sampleward, aptly named. Welcome. Good to see you both. Gene, Amy, welcome back. Good to see you both as well. I actually got to see Gene in person this week, which was a real treat. But your faces coming through the internet. Where? Where? In DC in a in a meeting. Oh, cool. Yeah, it was wonderful to see Amy and hear a little bit more about her family and learn, learn about things going on. um, and great to see you too, Tony. Thank you. Last time we were together was the 50th. That’s right. Yes. All right, um. So Amy You have been, uh, you have lots of conversations with funders, intermediaries, nonprofits, uh, I’d like to start with you just. What are folks talking about? Yeah, I think there’s A lot of desire for thoughtful conversation across the sector right now and, and over, you know, the last handful of months and I’m sure the months to come. And that desire for thoughtful conversation is trying to be held in a time where things feel rapidly unraveling, you know, and A few, I think patterns have been coming up at least in the versions of conversations that I’m, I’m in, whether those are, you know, 1 to 1 with other intermediary organizations, capacity building organizations, um, nonprofit service groups or, or even philanthropy serving organizations or with funders themselves, and they’re, of course, different. You know, flavors of the same dish maybe, but I think everyone really wants to hear and help and It feels like there’s not that much help happening. Um, I think when you talk to funders are presume you’re talking about. How does that go? Like you you should be funding technology, you should be funding capacity building, you should be funding. that are advocating for things or yeah, I mean, part of what sees as our kind of theory of change in the way that we make impact is of course and directly supporting nonprofit staff through training but also shifting the conditions in which all of us are doing this work. Right, so asking funders to fund adequately for the technology and data that is needed to, to deliver the programs, their funding right is part of that or, or all kinds of other advocacy, um, big, big a little a, you know, influencing thropy, and they, and I, I have to do, so they take these meetings like they don’t mind being told what they ought to be funding. Oh, it’s easy to take a meeting. It doesn’t mean you’re making you’re implementing what’s what’s the outcome and what’s the action? I realize that. But I’m OK, I’m, I’m, I think that most of the, most of the conversations N10 is entered into with foundations are not necessarily on the premise of like, can you please give us this feedback to fund a certain way, right? We just say that when we have access to. To folks that we, that we could share it with, but mostly, um, I think in these times, just like honestly in 2020 funders and other philanthropy serving organizations are asking for what we see because we are able to see into a lot of different types of organizations across the sector, not even just in the. and see trends that are emerging, see what folks are really asking for help on right in a way where we’re not having to divulge, oh, this organization that’s your grantee, they don’t know how to do this, right? There there’s not that vulnerability we’re able to share trends and unfortunately, the trends aren’t aren’t new, but, but at least they’re asking about them right now and they. are very, um, vulnerable issues. Like we are seeing incredible lack of security readiness in organizations. And as we’ve talked about on this show, and Gin has talked about, you know, there’s a lot to be concerned about when you think of a nonprofit organizations like digital and cybersecurity because It’s your staff, it’s your content, but it’s also all of your constituents, all of those people who’ve received programs and services, and if you feel that your mission and your programs and services are vulnerable, those folks in your community who’ve accessed them are 10 times more vulnerable, right? um, than your organization is, and that’s something that I think for us we just. We care about that kind of more than anything and so it really has felt like a spotlight on security and even just to um illustrate, we we can created a new program just to try to help in this way, um, a 3 month just security focused program. We had a single email that said that it was open. Um, In 4 days, we had 400 applicants from 26 different countries asking to be in the 20 people, you know, cohort, so That was, I think, validation that we were really hearing the trend and hearing what, OK, what are, what’s behind some of these questions that we’re getting? What are people really struggling with and oh my gosh, OK, we’re right, they are really struggling with security. This is um let’s, let’s bring Gene in on uh on security. You’re nodding a lot, Gene. And, and we have talked about, as Amy said, uh, as they said, we, we have talked about it, but, uh, you know, it’s, it bears amplification, because we, we all have talked about cybersecurity, protecting data, but especially as Amy’s saying, the, the, the people you’re doing the work for, if you’re, if you’re involved in a people, uh people oriented work, Gene, remind us. Oh, I’m amplifying everything Amy says, as I’m wise to do, um, but maybe I’ll just add that, you know, when people think, including funders, when they think about technology and, and some of them are just focused on AI right now, but technology is much broader than that, of course. When they’re thinking about technology, they really have to think of it as one of the core assets of an organization, and that’s not all because it’s also a huge risk and liability not only to the organization but all to all its beneficiaries and its communities that they serve and it’s communities that they exist in so it’s all of that it’s it’s even more complicated. To manage if I might venture and say this, then your other main investments which are like in staffing and in facilities like this is stuff that we don’t have a lot of experience with it’s newer things that are coming up. We haven’t learned how to manage it very well. It’s a little bit out of control. as it develops as with AI going on we don’t even know what the laws are related to this um so this is stuff that funders need to fund and organizations need to invest in really badly and when they don’t think about doing this they’re they’re really. Living for the short term at the expense of the intermediate term because it’s not even that far off in the future where these risks will ripen. They will ripen very, very quickly now. um, so that’s my two cents. And add to what she’s saying. I talked to two different, um. Funders who are who are regional funders, not national funders, and said, hey, I know the folks that are your grantees, they’re um predominantly rural organizations. They’re predominantly very small organizations, you know, single digit FTEs. There are folks that we can see in our data, not as individuals or individual organizations, but by kind of organizational demographics, are, are very likely to have really low scores, you know, ineffectiveness in these areas. We have free resources. We’re not even like asking you to fund us necessarily, like, which I should have been asking, but, you know, coming at it from really how do we get these resources available to organizations who we know are vulnerable, and their feedback was, well, security is not an issue that any of our grantees have raised with us. And I just want to pause there because why would a grantee in the vast power imbalance between a very small rural two-person organization and a funder, say we don’t have a security certificate on our website, we don’t have secure, you know, donation portal, we don’t. Have a database protect like why would they surface these would be fun? Of course they had of course no one has brought this up, right? Why would they point you, you need to be thinking beyond what was in that grant application and about really the, the safeguarding of that mission. Not only why would they admit it, but it may very well have nothing to do with, although it’s, well, it is related to what they might be seeking money for, but it, it’s, it’s grant application. Yeah, it’s not, it’s right, it’s not gonna be a question on the grant application is your, you know, do you have a, do you have a secure fundraising portal? Um, Gene, you have some advice around board like this should be at a board level, board level CEO conversation, right? Yeah, I mean it’s where it starts to get started. Yeah, and, and very obviously like technology comes up as a budget item, right, for the board. So when the boards are approving annual budgets, are they leaving any space for technology changes? Well, so many organizations, including public governments, are, are just like putting patches, right? They’re investing in patches and so they’ll patch, patch, patch. Um, but the technology is advancing so much quicker than patches can actually address. And again, The persons and organizations at risk are not only the the charity itself, right? It’s all of the beneficiaries whose data they’ve compiled and potentially like just goes beyond that as well. So it’s really, really important now for the boards to say let’s think about this as one of our core assets and our core risks and figure out how we’re going to properly budget for this item. And talking about sort of risk opportunity, you know, assessments and saying, well, what happens I, I’m a big fan of scenario planning and maybe it’s hard because these things don’t have definitions but over strategic planning for like a a longer term plan. I think scenario planning right now is really important because the the environment is just shifting so quickly, right? It’s like shifting every few months it feels like so scenario planning for different scenarios and and some of that would be well what happens if we don’t change our technology or what happens if we don’t invest? What are the worst things that can happen? What are the likely things that are gonna happen? and do we actually have board members who understand any of this? Do we need to relook at our board composition? Do we have anybody younger than 50 on our board? And for a lot of organizations, too many organizations, the answer is no, which will hurt you in the fundraising sort of pipeline down the road very quickly as well. Um, we’re not incorporating enough, um, Gen Z, millennials into the governance and leadership positions as, as boomers and even, um, Gen X are are are hanging on to positions longer. You know, for, for a reason, for a good reason, but, um, we need to bring more younger people into the pipelines because they have perspectives. They have a lot of what’s at risk, um, here as well. So that’s kind of my thinking in with respect to fiduciary duties, in the budgeting, they’ve got to understand it. In the recruiting for board members, they’ve got to figure out how to develop the pipeline of who to bring in on the board, like in their duty of loyalty, like to the organization’s best interests, they’ve got to be. Thinking not only about the purpose or the mission of the organization they’ve got to be thinking of the values of the organization, including how much they value the community and all of this relates to the organization’s um what what I’ll call it’s. Reputation or it’s just um legitimacy to the public at a time when the government is poking holes at organizations’ legitimacy if you haven’t earned that from your own community fundraising and everything else will will just dry up so you’ve got to invest in legitimacy if you’re not investing in technology at this point and protecting persons that rely on you. To safeguard their data you’re gonna lose legitimacy really quickly and you’re gonna be irrelevant or or, you know, liable for, for what are two quick things to what Gene’s saying on, on the staff side but then also on the board side. Plus a million to everything Gene said about making boards more diverse, um, including age, but I don’t want folks to think that that means because you need to like have a 25 year old on your board that’s now in charge of your technology. The board’s job is not to be in charge of your technology, but having more folks in that board meeting who have perspective or experience a lot of different. Things are possible helps open up strategic conversations to say, hey, have we considered this? Not that I’m now the implementer because I’m the board member, but it really does help and I just want to draw that line that we’re not saying make someone on your board in charge of technology, but having people comfortable with technology strategy conversations is very, very valuable, of course. The other side on the staff side, You know, one thing we see in our research, um, and our, you know, different assessment tools and in our programs, yes, there are still organizations that don’t have all the policies that they could have, right? They don’t have strong data retention policy, they only think, oh well, payroll files or HR files, right? They’re not thinking about all of the data, all of the content, you know, all these different things, right? We can have a big policy book and there’s work to be done there. But the real area of vulnerability that we see is organizations likely have some policies, but they do not have staff fidelity to those policies. So you could like go through a checklist and be like, yep, data consent policy, data collection, you know, but staff don’t know the policies exist and they are not practicing them at all in a consistent way. And so I wanted to go back to the scenario planning note because I think we see some folks um. You know, yes, you could bring in a consultant or you could get some sort of big security like test going, but what you could also do is in a staff meeting just take that time and say right now if we got an email that we had been hacked, what do we all think we would do? And just talk it through together and see oh this person. Thinks we would do this and this person over here says, oh we have an account here. What do we have? What, what is our answer, right? What, what are the questions we don’t know how to answer? Let’s go answer those questions for ourselves and really have more um opportunity I think to surface with staff where people don’t know something, not in a shame way but in a like, gosh, this is what we should focus our training on isn’t just let’s draft another policy. Let’s understand how to do these things as the people doing them every day. Amy, uh, in, in a couple of minutes after Gene and I talk about something that I’m gonna ask him, then I’m gonna ask you something, but you, you, I don’t want to put you on the spot with no, no forewarning. If we have, let’s, let’s take a, let’s take a, our audience is small to mid-size, so let’s go more toward the smaller, let’s take a, let’s take a, a 15 person nonprofit. Uh, it, I’m not sure it matters what the mission is. I, I, I don’t want to constrain you. I want you to think broadly. I, I’m the CEO of a 15-person nonprofit. Uh, we’ve got a $4 million annual budget. Is that 2, maybe 33 to $4 million annual budget for 15 employees, full-time employees. Uh, what I’m gonna ask you in a couple of minutes is what, what are some, what, what basic things can you name for us that, that we ought to have? OK. You, I thought that was you know way, you know, yeah, I know you’re gonna start writing, thank you. Gene, I want to ask you, uh, I, I, let’s let’s talk about the core assets of a nonprofit. Uh, you, you, I love that you’re identifying technology as a core asset. Are there, are there other core assets that, that I’m not thinking of? The staff is typically number one, right? Facilities is typically a pretty big investment, although that’s been changing um with a lot of remote working now and organizations seeking to downsize how they allocate where their investments are, where their assets are. um, staffing is also changing and. Part because of some technology, right? So if technology isn’t in that bucket in there, you may be downsizing staffing, you may be reducing facilities, but why is that happening? Probably somewhat related to your technology. If your funding stays stable. I know that’s a big assumption, but probably technology is playing a part in that. Is your technology? Gonna break down like in a year. That’s something to really think about. If you’re now reducing staffing and reducing facilities, relying on technology that’s gonna break down in a year or give you problems in a year or create harm to your beneficiaries, that’s like the big one that that Amy raised that, that really hits home for me. It’s like. Now you’ve got to really rethink what was the board doing? Did you even think about that? Um, so you know as part of your fiduciary duty of care, and again I love to think of it in terms of both the mission of the organization and the values of the organization which if I bring it down to fundamental human rights, it’s preserving dignity to your beneficiaries, right? And if you’re not safeguarding your private data and if you’re letting health data flow away, and this includes your employees too, right? like. Like your key stakeholders, if they can’t trust you. Then your legitimacy is also gone, right? So you’re really just shooting yourself in the foot unless you’re doing that. So boards have got to now rethink like we maybe weren’t thinking about technology that way so much before, but as we’ve seen how exponentially, you know, um, exponential changes technology creates for our organizations and the environments and what we invest in and what our risks are, boards have got to be in the mix and I agree absolutely with with um. Amy, it shouldn’t be the 30 year old or 25 year old board member who’s like, OK, you’re in charge of the technology. Yeah, no, no, it’s, it’s, but it’s another perspective in there. Yeah, and it’s, it’s, it’s better informed, uh, look, I’m the oldest person on the on the meeting, uh, in our chat. Uh, they’re, they’re better informed, you know, they, they, they have a a fluidity, they think about things that, that 63 year old is not gonna think about or 55 year old is not gonna think about. Um, so I’m just kind of fleshing out, yeah, of course, different perspective, but how so? Because they, uh, depending on their age, they either grew up with, you know, uh, technology is an add-on to my life. And some people have had it since like age 5. You know, I had a rotary phone at age 5. And I always dialed it backwards. So, you know, I was challenged from the beginning. Our colleague, our colleague is looking up from our uh homework assignment, homework from their homework assignment. What, uh, what, what do you, what you, what can you enumerate for us? I have 5 things I wrote down off the top of my head. I don’t know that if I had. You know, 50 minutes instead of 5 minutes that I would write the blog post with these same 5 pieces, but I think all of them, I know you gave me an organization, kind of 15 people, 4 million, but I don’t think any of these. Are unique to that organization. So I just want to say that. The first is cyber insurance. I know everybody thinks like let’s make sure we have our DNO in place. Check the box for some insurance as well, you know, um. Let’s make sure everybody DNO directors and officers insurance in case you’re not familiar with that, that’s, that’s an essential should definitely have that directs and officers, thank you. Yeah. Yeah, the second piece I um put down was data deletion practices. I feel like there’s such a focus on preserving data and content at all human reason, um, but actually, Like, to what end do you have this, especially to to Jean’s point before about the dignity of people, and they’re not in your program, you’re not reporting on them, you know, to a funder, you’re not, why are you saving every bit of this if it means somehow that list is taken, you know, um, and we talk a lot in our kind of closed cohorts when we’re working with organizations. That it isn’t that we don’t think there’s value in being able to look at longitudinal data of your programs and, you know, do that evaluation, but you don’t need to know that Amy Sample Ward was the person in that program, right? There are ways that you could anonymize the data and still preserve the pieces that are helpful for your program like evaluation. Well, removing the, the risk of it still being me or Jean or Tony, you know, associated. So I really think deletion practices and policies that dictate when you delete things, how much of it you delete, what you um anonymize is really important. Third, This is, I think, hopefully more top of mind for folks since so many organizations. Maybe became hybrid or virtual or remote permanently from the pandemic and that’s content and machine backups and and redundancy. I see a lot of organizations who say, oh, but we use the cloud, right? Like we use Microsoft 365 or we use Google Workspace. OK, but in your day to day is every single document that someone’s working on in those systems and if they’re downloading it to work on it offline for any reason. Well, does it have data in it? You have constituent information in it, um, but also like if someone’s working on something and they’re You know, computer is stolen or broken or vulnerable, is all of that backed up somewhere? Do you, you know, there it’s quite simple to set a full machine backup to the cloud every day too, right? But it, it just takes thinking of that, prioritizing it and setting it up, um, including, including with that recognizing. That employees might be using their own devices. They, they probably shouldn’t be, you should be, or you should, you should at least be funding their technology, their, their monthly Wi Fi bill, etc. but beyond just recognizing that they may not even be using exclusively your technology and, and what’s the, what’s, so then what’s the redundancy and backup of on their own devices. Technology policies that say the only tool you could use is the laptop we gave you are intentionally limiting your own understanding of how those workers are working because there’s no way that they are only using that laptop you gave them. So, having a policy that says this is how you safely access our tools, whether you’re using our laptop or not, at least allows you to build the practices, the human side of security into that use instead of pretending it doesn’t happen, you know. Yes, yeah, OK, number 4 and number 5 are somewhat similar, but again this is where we see big breakdowns in practice. Number 4 is that Every system that can have it has two factor enabled and is required. There’s so many ways to do to factor that it isn’t an excuse to say that it’s like burdensome, it doesn’t have to be like, it doesn’t have to be a personal text message. It could be an authenticator app, whatever, but like you need to have to factor on everywhere, um. And need to be using a password manager so that staff are not sharing passwords with each other by saying, hey Gene, the password to, you know, our every.org account is is this like, oh my God, you know, that we can both we can both log in but it’s encrypted we don’t see the password, right? We’re sharing it um in a safe way. And then the last one, number 5, is that, again, a practice, organizations have established processes for admin access for if you get logged out of something that it is not. I email Tony and say, oh, hey, will you send that password to me? Like, most of the security vulnerabilities that we see with organizations isn’t because somebody was in a basement and hacked their way in. It’s they sent one phishing email and a staff person responded and was like, oh yeah, here’s your password, right? Like, it wasn’t hard to get in. So, If you have a policy that says you’ll never email each other to say I got logged out, what is, what is a more secure way? OK, well, I call you on the phone. We have this secure password that we say to each other that only staff know and like. I’m not saying that has to be your plan, right, but it isn’t just randomly, oh, the ED sends an email to the staff person that says, please reset my password. Like, I don’t think that’s gonna be foolproof, you know. OK, so it’s just as simple as like a procedure for what happens when somebody can’t can’t log in. Exactly, because that does happen. So why not create something where everybody on the team knows this is what we do. I know I’m doing it safely, you know, and following the procedure. OK, those are pretty, those are pretty simple. Um, so you might, you might say, well, cyber insurance, that’s not simple. It’s not like I can do it today, but you can talk to brokers, you can talk to insurance brokers for cyber insurance, data deletion policy. I’m gonna venture that N10 has a, uh, sample data deletion policy and its resources. There you go. Backup and redundancy. Do you have, is there advice about that in Yeah, there’s lots of it, but I’ll put it on our list to make sure that there’s some guidance on that on our cybersecurity resource hub, which is all free resources, so I’ll make a note of that. Beautiful. 2 factor and and password manager. All right, that, I think that’s pretty well understood. I mean, uh, I, I have clients that use the, uh, the, the Microsoft authenticator. As soon as, as soon as I hit, as soon as I hit enter on the, on the laptop, I can’t even turn to my phone fast enough. The Microsoft Authenticator app is already open, notified. I’ve already got the not in the, in the second it takes me to turn from one side of my desk to the other. The authenticator is open. Uh, so it’s not, there’s no, it’s not like there’s no delay. Right, um, OK, and a procedure for not being able to log in, uh, uh, I bet you could find that on the intense site too. All right, thank you for that quick, quick homework. Thank you. All right, all right, so this is eminently doable. And then there’s, you know, of course you have to go deeper. There, there are policies that you need to have, but you know, I wanted something kind of quick and dirty, so thank you for that. All right, all right. Um, Should we turn to just like general state of the sector from our cybersecurity conversation? Sure, um, Amy, you wanna, you wanna kick that off? You kick that off. Yeah, I do talk to lots of people and I think, you know, we’re hitting the two-year mark of kind of like unavoidability of people constantly talking about AI which I have my own feelings about, but, you know, If I step out of any one day’s conversations about AI and look at the last two years, we’re in a very different place of those conversations, you know, um, in a way that I think I finally feel good about how the trend is going in those conversations, um, a lot of one on one calls I have with, with really diverse organizations, you know, small advocacy organizations, global HQ or, you know, like all kinds of folks is. How do we not use the tools that are being marketed to us? And how do we build a tool that’s purpose-built, that’s closed model, that’s just the content we want it to have, right? And like actually useful for us. Which I think is really exciting, that folks are kind of seeing that it’s, it’s just technology, just like, yes, it has different capabilities, you do different things, different tools do different things, of course, but I’m really excited that it feels like folks are trending towards. Well, we have some use cases. How do we build for those use cases versus we want to adopt these things? How could we find something to do with these things we want to adopt, which I think was the reverse order of it all. You and you and I have a friend who is devoted to this exact project, uh, George Weiner, CEO Whole whale, they’ve created Cas writer. Yeah Horider.AI, which is intended exclusively for the use of small and mid-size nonprofits, limited, limited learning model, uh, your content safe within it and not being skilled in artificial intelligence, that’s about the most I can say about it. But whole well, they have a, they’ve, and they’re not the only one I’m sure, but they’ve created a product specifically, uh, to take advantage of. The technology of AI, but reduce a small and mid-size nonprofit’s risks around your use of it in terms of what it brings in and how it treats the data that you provided. Yeah, causes writer, change agent, there’s a number of folks in the community. You know, trying to help organizations in this way, which I think is great, um, but a trend, a smaller trend in the last couple months in these AI conversations, bigger trends like I said, but there’s also this piece where I’m hearing from folks saying that. They can tell, for example, a colleague used Chat GPT Gemini, and, you know, a large tool like that to to make this proposal that they sent to them or this email, and when they say, hey, it’s really clear that you used Gen AI tools to write this, could we talk about it and get into like your thoughts more about it? There where they had in the past felt that folks were like, oh yeah, I did, but like here’s what I was thinking. Now there’s just complete denial that the tools were used. They lie. People lie? Yes, that’s right. And so to, they’re like, well, how do we have strategic conversations about the way we use these tools if you’re going to deny that you’re using them. Well, let’s let’s talk about what, when you lie to someone about anything, especially I don’t, I don’t, it seems innocuous to me, but, uh, including AI, well, I’ll, I’ll, I’ll leave my own adjective out of it. I think it’s innocuous. It’s so the the technology is so ubiquitous, but all right, if you lie about anything, you, you lose legitimacy. I, if I were a funder, uh, OK, thank you very much. Goodbye, because you just, you just lied to me about something that I don’t think is such a big deal even. And I’m giving you a chance that I was able to point to it, you know, yeah, and I’m giving you a chance to overcome it. I want to have a chat human to human, and you’re denying that the premise of my question. OK. All right, I’m so I’m shocked, obviously, I really, I’m dismayed that people are lying about their use. That’s completely contrary to what the advice is ubiquitous advice is that you’re supposed to disclose the use. Right. I’ll just throw in there that. Please, Gene, get me off my, push me off my soapbox. Well, back to kind of board composition, if you ask a bunch of board members, I think many of them. Would say AI is just like one thing. They have no idea that like AI is a million things, right? And you’re probably using many, many forms already whether you realize it or not, even on a Google search, like, you know, AI is popping up now you might, that might be a little bit more obvious now, but. Just to, to know that AI if I compared it to a vehicle, for example, it could be an airplane, it could be a bicycle, it could be a tank, right? They they all have very, very different purposes and repercussions and so you have to understand that like, oh we’re gonna like invest more in AI. That doesn’t mean a whole lot. So, um, to figure out what your what your strategy is again, I, I, I think, um. Cybersecurity and when when organizations are gonna venture off into AI a little bit more they’ve got to see it as part of governance and not just information technology it’s not just the uh a management tool it’s part of their governance responsibilities. It’s time for Tony’s Take too. Thank you, Kate. Got another tails from the gym. This time, two folks whose names I don’t know yet, but I do see them. Fairly often, they’re not as regular as Rob. The marine semplify or uh Roy, I’ve talked about Roy in the past, not, not, not as common, but we’ll, we’ll, we’ll find out. Like I did find out the uh name of the sourdough purveyor, you recall that just a couple of weeks ago. Uh, I, I’m gonna hold her name, it’s in suspense now, but, uh, I learned her name, the, the one who gave the sourdough to to, to Rob. So these two folks were one of them, uh, the guy. Suffers dry eyes. And the woman he was talking to had the definitive. cure for dry eyes. You have to try this. And she was on him for like 5 minutes, you gotta try this. Hold, hold on to your, make sure you’re sitting because you know you’re not, you, you’re not gonna wanna, you’re not gonna wanna stumble and fall down when you hear the startling news of the dry ice cure of the uh of the century. Pistachios, pistachios. She was very clear. 1/4 cup. She, she did not say a handful, which to me a handful is a 1/4 cup. She didn’t say a handful. It’s a 1/4 cup of pistachios daily, right? This is a daily regimen you have to follow and you will get results within 3 to 4 hours. She swears it 3 to 4 hours, your eyes are gonna start watering. It’s gonna be like you’re crying and tearing, like you’re at a funeral or a wedding. That’s how much water you’re gonna have. All right, I editorialized that I added the wedding funeral, uh, uh, analogy, but she swears within 3 to 4 hours your eyes are, are gonna be watering. Follow the regimen, pistachios. She was also very precise. These are shelled pistachios. You don’t wanna get the, uh, the unshelled ones too much work, uh, which to me that’s interesting now that’s, that’s contrary to the advice that I’m hearing on, uh, YouTube. There’s that guy on YouTube, the commercial that I always skip, but sometimes I listen, uh, Doctor Gundry, you may have heard Doctor Gundry on the YouTube commercials. He talks about pistachios. He says get the unshelled ones because that way you won’t eat too many of them because you have to go through the task of shelling them yourself so you won’t eat too many because too many pistachios, according to Doctor Gundry now this is too many pistachios is bad, but the right amount of pistachios is, is, is, is beneficial, but he’s not as precise as the gym lady. He does not say Gundry, you can’t pin Gundry down. Of course, I didn’t listen to his 45 minute commercials, so, you know, I listened for like 7 minutes and I got the, the shelling, uh, the tip from, uh, from Gundry. So, He’s not as precise as the uh the dry eyes cure lady. A 1/4 cup of pistachios shelled every day. You’re gonna get immediate results. That’s all, it’s just that simple. cure the dry eyes. Don’t buy, don’t buy the over the counter. Don’t buy the saline in the bottle. Don’t buy the uh red eyes. Well, red eyes is a different condition that, uh, it’s different. She doesn’t claim to have a cure for that. Dry eyes, she, she stays in her lane. She’s in her lane, dry eyes. That is Tony’s take too. Kate. I like the specificity of the uh the shelled unshelled unshelled, no, no, no, get the shell, the ones without the shell, they’re already been shelled. She’s very precise cause that, because the shells are gonna take up more capacity and you know, and then you’re not gonna get the full 1/4 cup uh therapy. The treatment is gonna be lacking because you’re not gonna get a 1/4 cup because the shells are taking up space in your measuring cup. Well, then my next question would be like, salted, unsalted, old bay, no old bay. It’s like, Well, you should have been there with me. Uh, she didn’t, she didn’t specify. I think just straight up. She didn’t say salted or unsalted. That’s a good question. You’re gonna have to go on your own, let’s say if it’s a, if it’s a dry eyes regimen. Then you wanna, you wanna be encouraging fluids. So I would guess, now this is not her. I don’t wanna, I don’t wanna impugn her, her remedy, her treatment, you know, with my, my advice now I’m just stay in my lane. This is not my specialty, dry eye cures like hers. I would say you probably want the unsalted because salt, uh, salt causes, uh. More dryness, right, if too much salt, you know, you become dehydrated, I believe, so. But again, that’s not her. You know, I don’t wanna, I don’t wanna add anything on to her, her strict regimen. Um, oh, and by the way, uh, I heard one of the, uh, commentators I listened to on YouTube said, uh, somebody had Riz. I knew exactly what they meant, yeah, I knew exactly. I didn’t have to go look it up in the, I knew it, charismama. I said, oh, I know that. I don’t, I don’t have to go look it up in the uh in the slang dictionary. Oh, so proud of you. Yes, thank you. That’s just a couple of days later. All right. We’ve got Beu but loads more time. Here’s the rest of the state of the sector, beginning with AI with Jean Takagi and Amy Sample Ward. Now I asked about the state of the sector and we’re back into cybersecurity. It only took about 6 minutes, uh, and we’re like 1 minute and uh and then we just talked about it for 5.5 minutes. So, all right, where there are bigger things going on in the nonprofit sector. You know, our, our, uh, federal government, uh, the regime is, is, uh, has found nonprofits that are complicit in terms of universities. Uh, I don’t think it’s gonna stop there. um, we are, you know, both the left is, is under attack and. In a lot of different ways and that, that impacts a lot of nonprofits that do the type of work that is essential, you know, whether it’s legal rights or human rights, uh, simple advocacy, um, I mean, even feeding certain populations, uh, so obviously immigrant work, um, let’s. Uh, let’s go to the uplifting subject of, uh, the, uh, the state of the sector generally. Like, let’s put AI aside now for, for 15 or 20 minutes and just talk about. What people are, what people are feeling, what people are revealing to you. Gene, I’ll turn to you first for this, you know, what, what, what do you, what are people concerned about? What’s happening? Well, um, what’s on people’s minds is what I what I mean. Yeah, I, I think the sector is still feeling the the impact of the broader public being very polarized, um, and the effect of not only government actors on, um, uh, inflaming the polarization but on media as well, and nonprofit media is not exempt from that, uh, as well. So really is about trying to figure out, well, how do we. Move forward at a time where it is so polarized and where for many organizations the government is acting uh adverse to where our mission and our values are and they are affecting our funding and what’s gonna happen. So one of the trends going on right now I, I, I see is. There’s a greater understanding that we’re not gonna go back to the world. That, that was a year, right? We’re not going back there. We’re in this, what I’ll call is probably a transitionary period. I don’t think this period will last exactly like this either, but what’s gonna be next? What’s forthcoming? Is it gonna be worse? Is it gonna be better? And what can we do now as nonprofits to shape that direction? Like we can fight. Tooth and nail for everything right now, but if we’re not and by we, I’m including myself in the nonprofit sector, so forgive that indulgence, but if we can work towards a brighter future strategically, what are we thinking about instead of just sort of defending against every new executive order or every law and just trying to sort of fight on a piece by piece basis to just maintain scraps of of rights that. That we can preserve what what is our future plan, um, so we’re gonna also see with the diminished fundraising we’re gonna see some um consolidation in the sector, right? There’s, there’s a lot of nonprofits out there and they’re going to be a lot fewer nonprofits in 4 years. So what is gonna happen? So we’re gonna see more collaboration. We’re gonna see more mergers. We’re just gonna see a lot of dissolutions, um, and that’s gonna mean that a lot of communities are no longer gonna be served. So what other organizations are gonna pick that up? And if we have less funding to serve communities, do we need to find ways to do it in different ways, um, and so you know, back to technology, people will rely on technology, but that’s not the panacea for everything. Um, and I think collaboration is going to be a big part of it as well. So yes, there’ll be some consolidation and some mergers, but there’s gotta be other sorts of collaborations because the need is just gonna keep growing. Uh, but also trying to shape what we want in the sector is important and to understand that we’re not the only country that’s going through this, right? And we are more and more in a, you know, and this is one world and everybody impacts each other. And there are other very authoritarian countries that have really harmed their civil society and their nonprofit sectors, right? Yet there are nonprofits that continue to thrive. In those sectors, what are they doing? What can we learn from them? What gives them legitimacy when the government is not giving them legitimacy? There’s a lot to grow from here, evolve and adapt, um, but we are, and admittedly we’re in really, really harsh circumstances, so everybody is just sort of, you know, running all over the place without, without any direction still, but I think there’s more and more. Understanding that we’re gonna have to start to gather together and and and create some plans. I really agree with Jean and I, I’m also thinking about how we first started our conversation and How I said, you know, I’m experiencing folks really wanting to have thoughtful conversations, even though we may not be able to even make a container for those thoughtful conversations because of all the pressures and the anxiety and the unknowns. And I feel similarly here and in the way Gan is framed, framed the the uncertainty ahead because I see so many organizations who have never, through all the ups and downs, even if they’ve existed for 100 years, have never had to say. That their mission was political because no one has ever said that feeding hungry children was political or that housing people that don’t have a house is political or, or, you know, name most of the missions across the sector, right? Um. And now we’re in a place, you know, the last few months of the budget cycle and all of those debates made snap and uh so many programs became something where we we saw staff in the community saying like, oh gosh, well, normally I send a newsletter, normally, you know, this is my job and now I’m having to defend. That our organization exists and why we would exist and and what our programs do, but I also think to Jean’s point, there’s so much to learn and there is so much we already know. We do know how to do our work, right? Our folks who are running all kinds of missions and movements are experts and so even if we are. Um, looking at opportunities to collaborate, not just mergers and, and acquisitions or closing, but, but really collaborate in new and different ways, we don’t need to enter those conversations feeling like we don’t know anything. We know a lot. We’re just looking for maybe new venues or ways to apply that learning and that knowledge and I, I just, I wanna say that part because I, I don’t want folks feeling like they can’t enter those conversations because. They’ve just never done it before and they don’t know what what to even say. No, you know all about housing. You know all about resource mobilization in your community, whatever it might be, right? And so from there, there’s lots to grow from that that there’s already fertile ground. We, we have, yeah, we have experience, we have wisdom. Um, it sounds like, you know, you’re, you’re both talking about resilience. You know, we, we, we need, we’re, I guess in the current moment, we’re sort of treading water to see what’s coming as we’re, as we’re defending our, whatever, whatever our work is or whatever is important to us personally, because we, you know, we know that we, we can’t, we can’t take on everything, but, you know, we’re, we’re standing up for what it means the most to us. As, as individuals and as, as nonprofits. And then we’re waiting to see what, you know, what the future holds, um. I, I, I agree. I, I don’t, I don’t think it’s gonna be this extreme, but I also agree we’re not, we’re not going back to uh the 2016. Yeah, I’m just a really strong believer in, in one thing you said, Tony, about like what we want. There, there’s some things we want, and I think that is true of most of the country. I think for a lot of things, we want the same thing, right? It fundamentally it’s dignity for everybody, um. Uh, and, and dignity for our own communities. So just trying to find that and showing how nonprofits further that goal and making sure. That your representatives know that is really critical. So right now our our representatives just seem to be voting as blocks, right? They just vote along party lines and they’re not doing much more, but that would change if en masse, like the people that vote them into power say these are the things that really are meaningful to us like do something. You know about these fundamental things we wanna be able to feed our children we wanna feel safe on our streets like they’re just fundamental things, um, and then we can talk about how to accomplish that and we might have disagreements on, on that, but make sure the representatives know that they’re gonna be held accountable for helping people get what they really want and what the things that most are are most important to to them. That are meaningful to them, um, because so many things that people are shifting the arguments towards have no real meaning to their personal lives like attacking certain groups, you know, for, for, for allowing them to have rights probably, you know, the people people are attacking them. It probably doesn’t make any difference in their day to day lives or not whether those other people have rights or not when we’re speaking about certain minority groups, but why are they attacking it because that makes them or or they’ve been positioned. I, I think they’ve been. Uh again with, with technology and AI they’ve been brainwashed into thinking this is the fundamental thing that separates us versus them and we have to be better than them and um I, I, I think we’ve really got to get off of that sort of framework of thinking and really having nonprofits connected with their communities and tying them to their representatives is really really important at this time. Yeah, that that zero-sum thinking. That everything somebody else gets detracts and takes away from me, my, mine. Whether it’s an organization or person. It reminded me of a conversation we had on the podcast. I’m trying to remember when it was, it was years ago, years ago, um. And I don’t remember what if it was uh political administration change or it was natural disaster. I don’t remember what maybe the original impetus was when we, when we very first talked about this, but It is reminding me of, you know, we’ve said before the value that every organization has in, in kind of sharing the, the information and the data and the lessons and the truth of your community and your work so that when people are putting into the garbage machine, you know, tell me the tell me the real. You know, stats about hunger in my city or whatever, who, who cares about that? But if they actually came to your website as an organization that addresses hunger and you said this, these are the real numbers, right? This is what it, this is what hunger looks like. It looks like a lot of different things, right? It’s like AI hunger can be all these different things, um. That’s an important role in this time that every organization I think can be contributing, really saying this is what we know, this is what we see. This we are experts on these topics so that There’s a little, even if it’s a small antidote to the spin and the and the media and the wherever those online conversations go, at least you were kind of putting on the record what you do know and see in your work. Exactly right. I, I think I remember we were talking about how to be heard when there’s so much noise out there in the social networks and in media. How, how does, how does a nonprofit get get heard, and part of your advice was you have your own channels. So, and including your own website. Yeah. Thank you. All right. All right. What are you hearing, Tony? You get to talk to people all the time too. You have your own angle. You’re sitting over here grilling Gene and I. You got that’s not fair. I don’t see and hearing. Gene, I hate when they do this to me. Gene, help me out. No, um, alright, I’m gonna put AI aside because there is so much of that. Um, Still, you know, funding, uh, people still reeling from the USAID cuts, you know, it fucking kills me. It’s $1.5 billion which there are, there are several 1000 people in the world who could pull out $11.5 billion from their pocket and replace all the AI, all the USAID funding. See, I said AI when I’m, it’s a ubiqui it’s, it’s, we’re, we’re. We’re like, we’re, we’re conditioned that could replace all the USAID funding with a check or with a crypto transfer, and they wouldn’t actually be cash like that’s bananas, and they wouldn’t miss it. So, you know, people still reeling, um, missions still reeling from the USAIDs. I have a client that’s, but I, I, I hear about it from others as well, um. And it wasn’t just USAID, but State Department cuts that were non-USAID funds. The State Department did a lot, um. Yeah, a little, a little in media, you know, I, I listened to some media folks, um, Voice of America, trashed, trashed under, uh, what’s Carrie Lake, you know, uh, used to, used to, you know, like our, our soft. What’s it called soft diplomacy, right? Like, like bags of rice, bags of flour and sugar through USAID and State Department, news and information that was trusted, unbiased. I know there are a lot of people who would disagree that it was unbiased, but still, the, the effort was to, to be unbiased, spreading news and information around the world, around the world. Uh, and then I guess also, uh, public media cuts here in the United States where grossly, ironically, Red rural communities are most impacted because they’re not gonna get emergency flood warnings like like just failed in help me with the state was it Kentucky, the the river that flowed and the and the camp that lost 20 counselors and children, was it Kentucky, Texas. I’m sorry, it was Texas, right, thank you, um. You know, emergency warning systems, let alone news and information, you know, we’ve, we’ve gutted, uh, corporate media long ago gutted local media, but just so news and information. Lost through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting funding. Corporation for Public Broadcasting, of course, winding down in I think October. September or October, uh, so their funding lost and even just as basic as like I’m saying, you know, emergency warning systems for rural communities, horns that blow. Uh, messages that get sent at 3:30 in the morning. That that overcome your do not disturb. Lost, you know, lost. Stupidly Um, and a, a lot of this, you know, we’re just not, what, what aggravates me personally is we’re just not gonna see the impact of it, some of it for decades, and we haven’t even gotten into healthcare. But we’re, we’re maybe not even decades, but just several years. It’s gonna take several years of Fail failed warnings about things that NOAA and the National Weather Service used to be able to warn us about, you know, 8 months ago, um, and health, health impacts in terms of loss of insurance, lost subsidies around Obamacare, uh, Medicaid cuts, and Medicare cuts likely coming, you know, we’re we’re gonna see. Sicker people. We’re gonna see a sicker population, but it’s gonna take time. It’s not gonna happen in 6 weeks or even 6 months, but it will within 6 years. We’re gonna be, we’re gonna be worse off, and we’re not, and we’re gonna blame the, the current then administration, whatever form it’s in. Nobody’s gonna be wise enough to look back 6 years. And say 6 years ago, we cut Noah and that’s why now today, in 2031, you didn’t get the hurricane notice. And then of course healthcare too. How about in fundraising, Tony? I mean, what I’m, what I’m hearing is, don’t rely on the billionaire philanthropists anymore. Like, yeah, yeah, we’re over, thankfully, we’re over that. I, I, I never, I, I, you know, there’s, there’s so far and few, few and far between and, and 10,000 people, 10,000 nonprofits want to be in, um, Jeff Bezos’ ex-wife, uh, pocket, I can’t remember her name, Mackenzie Mackenzie Scott’s pocket. 10,000, 100,000 nonprofits are pursuing that, you know, the focus on your relationships, build, work on donor acquisition, but not at the billion dollar level. Work on your sustainer giving program. Work on, work on the grassroots. Can you, can you do more in personal relationship building so that, so that people of modest means can give you $1000 or $5000. And, and people who are better off can maybe give you $50,000 but they’re not ultra high net worth. But if you’re building those relationships from the sustainer base up working on your donor acquisition program, how are you doing? Are you doing with the petitions, emails, and then a welcome journey and you’re moving folks along and then you’re bringing them in and then inviting them to things, you know, work at work at the grassroots level. Among the, the, the 99.9. 8% of us that aren’t ultra high net worth. The other 95%, for God’s sake, we’ve been doing this since 2010, 2010. Yeah, 2010, 15 years, right? Yeah, 15 years, 7, yeah. The other 95% were, you know, don’t focus on the wealthy that everybody wants to, you know, the celebrity. I got a client with big celebrity problems on their board. Names you would know, 3 names you would, everybody would know. Um, they’re a headache. They don’t, they don’t make board meetings. They cancel at the last minute. They, uh, last minute, like a couple of hours. After all the work has been done, all the board books have been sent, and a couple of hours’ notice, they can’t make it. And then the and then another one drops out. Well, if she can’t, then, then I can’t also. Uh, as if that’s a reason, and then, and then the board meeting is scrubbed, and now, now we’re, you know, now they’re struggling to meet the requisite board meeting requirement in the bylaws, right? But so, you know, celebrities, you don’t need celebrities, you need dedicated folks on your board who recognize their fiduciary duties as Gene talks about often, to you, loyalty, care. Is there a duty of obedience to? Is that one? Or is that’s, no, that’s, that’s the clergy. That’s the duty of obedience. I know it’s not celibacy. I know that’s not, I know that’s not good. Amy, why did you mute your mic when you’re laughing? Come on, let us hear you laugh. Uh, now I know it’s not celibacy, but uh loyalty and obedience, loyalty and care, sorry, loyalty and care. And what’s the other? There are 3. What’s the other of obedience in the laws and internal policies. Yeah, yeah, obedience to laws and internal policies, right. So but, but care and loyalty. That’s another one, another one of these celebrities. The giving to Giving to a charity that’s identical to the, the one that I’m that I’m working with in the same community, does the exact same work and major giving to that charity. So Yeah, you, you know, focus on the, on the 99.98% of us who aren’t ultra high net worth. The grassroots, work on your work on your donor acquisition and sustainer giving and move folks along from the $5 level to the $50 level. This is how it gets done. Things are hard, and there are things we can do. Yeah, thank you. There are, there always are. Yeah. If we’re, if we’re focused in the right place and, and bring it back to artificial intelligence, you don’t even need to use artificial intelligence if you don’t want to. Amy, you’ve said this to us. You don’t need to, and it, but, you know, but that’s, it’s, that is not all of technology and that is not all of your focus in 2025 and beyond. Especially. When using it is impacting care and loyalty and obedience and data protection and everything else, right? Thank you for putting a quarter in my slot. That really worked. There’s a lot going on and there are things we can do. How about we end with that? Because that’s up, that’s upbeat. There is a lot you can do. There’s a lot you know. Amy, you were saying we have so much you can do. There’s so much you do already know and That doesn’t change because it is so hard. It just reinforces how important it is that you do know all of that, that you do know what you are doing, that you can take some actions, even if they feel small. Making sure 2 factor is enabled everywhere could be the thing that saves your organization from being in the news, you know, like, that’s worth it. And it didn’t feel that big or overwhelming. And also everything is still horrible, but you did that thing and it was important to do. Know what you know. You know, a lot of people we don’t know what we don’t know, but you, you do know what you do know. Know what you do know, and, and take action around what you do know. Whether it’s two-factor authentication or, or uh talking to your board about sound technology, investment, or it’s Focusing on your sustainer giving. And there’s a lot going on, there’s a lot you can do. Thank you. And pat yourself on the back whenever you take those small steps because they’re probably bigger than you think. That was Gene Takagi. Leaving it right there. Our legal contributor principal of NO. With Gene Amy Sample Ward, our technology contributor and CEO of NE. Thank you very much, Amy. Thank you very much, Gene. We’ll see you again soon. Thanks, Tony. Thank you Tony. Next week, better governance and relational leadership. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guide, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for July 28, 2025: 750th Show!

 

Claire Meyerhoff, Kate Martignetti, Scott Stein, Gene Takagi & Amy Sample Ward: 750th Show!

It’s Nonprofit Radio’s 750th show and 15th Anniversary Jubilee. To celebrate, co-host Claire Meyerhoff shares her “Ode to Nonprofit Radio.” We have our associate producer, Kate Martignetti; 3 live songs from Scott Stein, including our theme “Cheap Red Wine;” and, our contributors Gene Takagi (law), and Amy Sample Ward (technology), are also on board. It’s fun and music and celebration! And gratitude.

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

 

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podon of your favorite hebdominal podcast. It’s July. It’s nonprofit radio. We’ve got the live music and that can only mean one thing. It’s our 750th show and 15th anniversary jubilee. Who was right. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, with what’s coming up for show number 750. Hey Tony, your co-host is Claire Meyerhoff. We’ve got much more live music from Scott Stein. Our contributors, Gene Takagi and Amy Sample Ward are here. Everyone is with us. Thank you very much, Kate. Claire Meyerhoff, how are you? So uh creative producer, nonprofit Radio, how are you doing? I’m, I’m doing just fine. I’m just in awe that once again, every year we come together, the same gang of six, and put on this fantastic show, and this one is number. Can it really be true? 750. True. That’s a huge number. $750. Like when you were a kid, if like someone was saving up to buy something that costs $750 that was, you know, a lot, a lot of money. If you went to the grocery store now and it came to $750 you’d be like, well, yeah, that kind of makes sense. So $750 really is a huge number and 15 years. Yeah, July of 2010. The show began as, as you counseled me, uh, because of the first two shows were the Tony Martignetti show. Uh, you counseled me that that was a mistake, that nobody’s gonna know what the hell that means. Uh, I was playing off, I was playing off one of my early influences, uh, I thought, well, that guy has a show named for him. So, but you, uh, you showed me the correct path, uh, you know, you gotta have nonprofit in there somewhere. And, uh, and I chose nonprofit radio and we’re gonna be talking a little about radio today, but, uh, yes, it was July 2010, it was 15 years ago. Well since I have because we, we knew each other before for a couple of years through the wonderful world of of plan giving, which we both are professionals and and we knew each other that way, and we had dinner in Cary, North Carolina at a steakhouse, and at that table you said to me, you know what, I want to do a radio show about nonprofits, and I was like, And this was before like podcasting was really commonplace or anything like that. And I was like, well, have you done a radio show before? No, no, no, but I, I know I’d be great at it. I’d love to do it. And I go, well, you know, there’s a lot to doing a radio show. Do you know about this? Do you know about that? Because my background for our audiences, I worked in, in, um, radio news for many, many, many years. I’ve worked at XM Satellite Radio, um, I’ve worked at, uh, I’ve worked for ABC Radio and WTOP in Washington DC, the all news station. And so I know a lot about production and putting things together and how radio really is something that you can kind of do it all by yourself, as opposed to television where you need all these other elements that come in like camera work and all that. So I said to Tony, I go, well, you know what, you know, I’ll I’ll help you with this. And you were like, oh, you know, that would be great. And we discussed the name and some other things and then I made for you. I thought what would be really helpful would be to make these kind of show sheets that when you’re pre-interviewing people, so maybe you can talk a little about that. What what’s I, I still use I still use your sheets for the show. Uh, Kate and I use them every single week. Yeah, so, you know, over the years I’ve adapted it, but it’s, uh, it’s based off of what you gave me for like show number 3 or something or whatever. So let, let’s, uh, let’s bring some other folks in. Sure. So I’d like to talk a little bit about, about our influences in radio because what Tony said to me, he said, I love, you know, Car Talk and I love these radio shows. They’re so important to me. So I’d like to talk a little bit about everyone else’s influence is in radio. My quick is I grew up. Around New York City, so we had a lot of radio. I listened to WNEW, you know, Scott Muni, Allison Steel the Night Bird on WNEW, and I just, I loved radio from, you know, when I was when I was a kid. So how about everybody else? Scott, what did you grow up with in the, in the Midwest? Yeah, I grew up in Akron, Ohio, and um the station that really was pivotal to me was WAPS 913, the Summit. Uh, which is a wonderful music station. They’re still around, still doing great stuff, uh, emphasis on independent music and local music and just stuff that wasn’t getting played anywhere else and really, um, it’s not a, not an overestimation to say that like it or an overstatement to say they it really helped shape my musical taste for years to come. Cool, very cool. Amy, yeah. What you got? Well, I did not grow up listening to the radio because my dad. love music and was always playing his own curated, you know, uh, playlist, um, record. Tim, Tim. That’s right, Tim, the one and only 10 sample, um. And so I associate radio with when I got a car and turned 16 and actually drove myself places and was like, What? You mean to tell me that there is music that is not blues? Oh, how interesting. Um. So I would listen to any radio station just for, you know, like that eyes opening, oh my gosh, there’s so much out there in the world experience. Um, yeah. That warms my heart as a as a radio girl that really, really warms my heart because the car, you know, the radio, the airwaves, traditional terrestrial radio is just the airwaves and they’re free. And basically, anyone could have a radio station and broadcast it and the FCC I grew up, you know, in, in the American classic situation for that like country roads, no other cars, windows down, just listening, you know. Love that so much. Gene, what do you have for us? So I’m like Amy and didn’t listen to a lot of music on the radio because I had mix tapes back then. And, um, that was my big thing. But if I was listening to the radio, it was often listening to like local sports teams and I grew up in Vancouver, British Columbia, so the Vancouver Canucks go Canucks, um, was a big thing for me and Seattle Supersonics back in the day, um, the NBA and bring back a, a Seattle NBA team. Wow, that’s, that’s, that’s really. That’s really amazing and you’re and you’re and you grew up in Canada, so everything had a C in front of it. Yeah, if there was a popular music station I listened to it was C Fun, which was now defunct, but um, yeah, that was the, the pop station back in the day. And did you listen to the games on and the sports on AM or FM? Oh, it was almost always on AM. I don’t think FM had sports back then. Right, right. That’s cool. Hey Kate, we know you’re younger than we are, but do you ever listen to the radio? Oh yeah, um, mostly, mostly in the car, but my mom loves the, um, like South Jersey classic rock stations. So that was constantly on wherever we went grocery shopping, to the beach, like that’s all I think we listened to. Do you remember the call call letters? what was what it was I don’t know. But I bet you do know every word to live on a prayer. 00, for sure. Scott started playing it, I could probably sing it. That’s Bon Jovi country. Right, South Jersey, Bon Jovi country and Bruce Springsteen, of course. Bruce Springsteen. So Tony, how about you? What are your, what are your earliest radio memories? Yeah, uh, rock and roll, 102.7 WNEW, uh, you mentioned Scott Muni and Alison Steele. Um, there were, there were others, um, Pat Saint John, classic, uh, classic rock DJ in New York City, um, Dennis Elsis, exactly right, yep, Dennis. He was what? Pete Pete, yeah, you, you, you were obviously listening as well. You remember them better than Pete had that twangy voice. Pete Forna. He wrote a radio in the television age, and I went into the city and because they had a signing at a bookstore. So he was there and, um, Dennis Elsus was there and I was going to Plattsburgh State at the time, and Dennis Els, Pete Foritel wrote in my book. And then Dennis Elsis wrote, Rock lives all over, even in Plattsburgh, he wrote. And do you know who I gave that book to for his collection? I gave it to Sam a few years ago when I visited his studio. I gave it to, uh, to Sam in New York. Our producer Sam Liebowitz. He has a really nice collection of like books about radio and music and and I thought that book would fit well in there. So I gifted that book to him and he cool. That’s very thoughtful, very thoughtful. And then later years, you know, you mentioned the the kind of influence on my On the, on the podcast, uh, Car Talk definitely on, on, uh, National Public Radio’s WNYC was station in that we got in, uh, New York and New Jersey, WNYC, the Car Talk guys, uh, you know, you can’t approach them, but they could, they certainly were an influence, you know, that I knew they had. Elements comedic elements that you could look forward to. Each show or or every couple of shows like Stump the Chumps and their credits, you know, the, the closing credits, their, their car driver was the, they had a, they had a, a, a Russian car driver, uh, pick up and drop off. So, you know, stuff like that, cornball, right, exactly, corn, but you could count on it every week, they were gonna credit pick up and drop off for being their chauffeur. Um, so things like that and then so elements of the, of the Car Talk show and then also another show on WNYC which was pure Talk, uh, Brian Lehrer. I don’t know if he’s still there, but uh he became nationally syndicated, I think. Yeah, Amy Amy and Scott, yes, you, you’ve, you’ve heard Brian Lehrer. He originates from WNYC. Um, he’s still there on WNYC. Awesome, awesome syndicated across the. Oh across which network? Public media. OK, yeah, well, Claire, I got the idea for the Tony Martignetti show from the Brian Lehrer Show, but Tony Martignetti is not quite widely, uh, and even in 2015, so even more so in 2015, what am I saying, in 2010, in 2010, 15 years ago, uh, not as widely known as Brian Lehrer, and so, you know, everybody knew him as a political junkie and He had a lot of political guests and uh that was mostly what he did as well as general news, but you have to reserve the Tony Martignetti show for just wherever you happen to be and the name of what chaos you are bringing to any scenario, you know. Just the Tony Martignetti Nonprofit radio is a podcast, you know. All right, thank you. Like when I go to, I could, I could, I could get everybody’s Tony Martignetti show. When I go to the nonprofit technology conference hosted by nonprofit podcast, but it’s put the word radio in it. You’d like that, you know, Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio, because why, Tony, it’s the sound of it. Well, radio was an influence for the show. And uh I, I have some nostalgia for radio and radio is a very personal medium, you know, like you’re saying, listening in the car, um, uh, it’s just, uh, radio, radio seems to be talking to me, you know, when I listen to radio, I feel like, I feel like the, the host, the DJ, they’re talking to me and that’s what I want, you know, I wanna be talking to. Our listeners, each of our listeners, and sort of channeling what interests them so that they’re a part of the conversation. As as as as as much as can be. So that was, those were my thoughts for around why. Well, and your instincts are correct because when I was in, you know, broadcast journalism school at American University and we were learning the basics, we learned that radio, uh, and television too is a one on one medium, like when you’re talking, when you. On the air, you’re just talking to one person. So you don’t say like you all out there in radio land, you just say you. So if you’re doing a news story about a traffic thing, you just say, you know, if you’re traveling on, you know, I-270, blah blah blah, you don’t say all you people out there on the road, thousands of people listening to me. It’s just you. And so, so it’s a very personal, personal medium. That those were the, those were the influences. I’m glad Brian Lehrer still has the Brian Lehrer show nationwide. Uh, he was, uh, when you, when you hear Brian, you’ll know he was, he was an early influence for this very show. And uh it’s time for uh. Live, live full live song number one. Scott Stein. You’re gonna play a song that, uh, that I asked you to play. Uh, you, the your album is uphill. We might get this on the video. There’s the album right there. It sits, it resides on my desk because I play it. Uh, the album is uphill, which sounds challenging, but you made the last song. It’s a good life. Yeah, it’s well it’s a I think it’s a challenging record. It was, it was reflective of a a fairly challenging time in my life and it was important to in the narrative of the record to be building towards something hopeful or something that that hints at something better to come. I know folks are gonna love the 3 songs you’re doing for us today, so let’s give an early shout and where can we buy your music? Oh, the best way to support me directly is actually at my band camp, uh, band camp sites that would be scottstein.bandcamp.com. You can order physical CDs or. Just downloads um that’s the the best way because there’s really no middleman other than the little bit that Bandcamp takes um um my music is also available in the iTunes store which is also if that’s your preferred method, that’s great, um, and it’s also on the streaming services Spotify, Apple Music, etc. etc. Everywhere fine music is is heard. Indeed. All right, thank you. Please, Scott. It’s a good life. All right. I got some inside information. Someone slipped me a copy of the master plan. I don’t understand. I’m always cynic skipping silver linings. the Oh The Busy As For very Did Oh Oh Oh, Scott, that’s just a beautiful song, beautiful song. Uh, don’t just stick to what you know, let it fly and watch it grow. I love that. I love that line, but the whole song, lovely, beautiful. Thank you. Thank you, Tony. Claire, it’s a good life. It is a good life, especially here on the 750th. Tony Martignetti nonprofit Radio broadcast. And you know, Tony had to learn what’s called audacity in order to produce his podcast. And I do, I have a podcast and I do it in garage band. And now with AI there’s a lot of tools. So Scott, I’d like to ask you, you know, you’re a musician and you’re in this world. How do you like, do you produce your own music and record it and how does that, how does that all go? Um, yes, in a way, uh, I always have a team around me of some sort. I, I play a number of instruments but not all of my instruments. Um, usually when I’m doing a recording, I mean, I, I don’t have my own studio, so I will go into somebody else’s studio and do the work. Um, I can do a little bit here at home, but most of it has to happen elsewhere, um, and I always have a producer. Excuse me, on the project. And in that case, their role is to be kind of the in charge of the project and to be an expert set of ears, you know, I always want somebody who can tell me, hey, that vocal line’s not working or hey, that’s really good do more of that, um, coming up with ideas for instruments, especially this last record where there’s a lot of. Um, a lot of textures, synthesizers, things that I don’t usually use, and I did that because I went to a specific, uh, producer, a friend of mine named Mark Marshall, because I knew he was somebody who could help me figure out what the sounds in my head were, um, and how to get them out and how to do it effectively and to bring his own experience and his own expertise into the room. You know, the role of a producer is so important and I work in the nonprofit space like Tony, and you know, we have conferences, right, and meetings and we do webinars and all that, and because my background is production, when I’m working on something, I bring that. Those skills, you know, to, to the event or the webinar or whatever. And a lot of times I’ll write, I’ll do like a rundown or a show sheet and the person will go like, wow, you know, I’ve never seen this. And I think the role of production is very like underrated in the. Nonprofit space, like when you put on an event or when you do something like how do you, how do you produce that and because there’s so many little pieces to it. And, and Amy, when it comes to the N10, I’m sure there’s a huge amount of production involved, involved in that. Can you tell us a little bit about that? Yeah, I mean, Tony will laugh like, like everything, there’s an N10 way that we do things versus maybe the standard way, but we don’t. We don’t have a staff person whose job title is the conference. We don’t have um a producer, you know, when you’re having a large in-person event, there’s um what they call a pre-con, which is meant to be like, you know, the incoming group, like somebody from, from N10 would go and represent us, and then there’s like the head of catering, the head of security, the head of AV that, you know, everybody sits there like behind a little Um, you know, name tent and kind of reports in before the doors open and, and all the work starts, um, and all 15 of us show up and they’re always like, So baffled and you know, they’re like looking for chairs and everybody’s like, no, it’s fine, I can stand, you know, they, and then when they like ask, OK, everybody go around, all 15 of us do an intro, you know, because everyone on the team produces the NTC and everybody has different pieces of it that they’re in charge of and You know, our like escalation is to the team. OK, if something’s not working, who who is available like on radio, right? Who’s available to meet in the staff office and solve this. Um, there’s not just one person who all that weight is on their shoulders and they have to decide everything, um, but really, you know, I think we say to the community, we’re, we’re always stronger together and we are always stronger together. So, so we do it as a team. Very collaborative. Yeah, totally. In your professional life, what kind of things do you present? Do you speak at, you know, conferences? Do you do webinars? Tell us a little bit about what, what you do, where the role of, of like producing it and putting it together and then presenting it come, come together. Yeah, that’s, um, I’m always dependent upon other organizations and other people to, to put it together. But yeah, I, I do a lot of webinars and, and speaking at conferences and, and things like that. And very, very, um, thankful for, for all of those people who can make it, uh, come together because I, I, I just talk and maybe show a few slides. So you do produce those slides perhaps you are putting together your slides with your with your key points. There, there you go, and I try to keep them heavily visual, which is really, really hard for a lawyer. Yeah, yeah, so, so on a, on a, what’s a typical topic you might speak on? What’s your specialty that everyone wants to hear Gene talk about? Well, I’ll say right now um it’s about nonprofit advocacy and you know during these challenging times um nonprofits do have a voice and they do have influence um and thanks to vehicles like Tony Martin. Nonprofit radio, uh, we get to to help encourage nonprofits to to learn what their uh sort of authority is because it’s usually a lot greater than they think it might be so that they can speak out um and hold, you know, hold the line uh when the line seems to be moving and pushing them back. That’s really interesting because these, these are kind of, you know, tumultuous tumultuous times. I was at the Carolina’s Plan Giving conference back in May and we had a whole panel about legal stuff and, and we had some really good speakers and the one thing that that I took away from it was that that there has become a um. Uh, you know, in our, in our society, there’s a lot of distrust now in, in, you know, government organizations, even nonprofits and things like that. There’s this sort of, you know, distrust that there used to be people trusted, you know, basically trusted the government and and trusted colleges and trusted nonprofits, but now there’s been like a, um, you know, an erosion, I think was the word that they used. And do you find that there’s kind of an erosion of of trust? These days, Jean? Yeah, I, I think in all areas there’s a little bit of erosion of trust and skepticism, uh, from the general public, but the nonprofit sector still, I believe, is leading as the most trusted area and that’s really something to hold on to, uh, as we can build bridges and then sort of take a stance in in what we’re doing so really, really just, um, counting on, on nonprofits if you will to to continue. To sort of advance human rights, civil rights, all of the things that nonprofit sectors of the nonprofit sectors traditionally done and so, um, I, I’m hopeful for, for better times and and more nonprofit voice out there. That’s a, that’s an excellent point and I think that nonprofits can use that in their messaging, um, you know, their public facing messaging about how, you know, trusted they are and they can show that in different ways by, you know, having a survey or or showing their, you know, um, their output like we did XYZ this year and and have photos of it and really show that that nonprofits are working and working for their, their mission and for their people and for their, for their donors. Yeah, and it’s not all of the regular things that people might be thinking of with ICE and with some civil liberties, but just things like AI and you know what happened with Open AI housed in a nonprofit? Is it going to be a for profit? It’s like there’s a lot of stuff out there where the nonprofit sector plays a critical role um and standing up for, for what the nonprofit sector is supposed to be, um, it is really important. But thanks for asking, Claire. So when you say AI is a nonprofit, I, I don’t even know. I mean, I use Chachi PT quite a bit it helps me, you know, figure things out and, and, you know, it’s like someone to talk to that’s a trusted person who does not have an ego. So I do use the Chat GPT for for work, but what do you mean AI is a nonprofit? Well, OpenAI, the creators of Chat GPT, it was started by Sam Altman and Elon Musk as a nonprofit organization and they housed much of the assets that still run Chat GPT, so. Um, the whole intellectual property owned by it, how Microsoft has come in with a lot of money, whether it was going to turn into a for-profit or it has turned into a for profit or is is shuttled, the assets were, were probably licensed back down into the for profit, although we don’t know all of the sort of the mechanics of it. Uh, but ultimately thanks to some nonprofit advocacy out there, uh, it’s going to be stay sort of this tied to this nonprofit organization and not just completely moved into a for-profit, and the nonprofit is supposed to maintain the ethics of the AI use, you know, whether it’s been successful or not, at least there is some regulation around how that AI can be used. So, uh, I’m thankful for that and the again the nonprofit advocacy. That kept that nonprofit in that game. And I think, you know, the, the, when my friends who don’t understand nonprofits that much and they go, well, aren’t nonprofits this or that? And I always say, well, you know, the number one thing about a nonprofit is it’s nonprofit. No one can make like a ton of, yes, you can pay your people big salaries or whatever, you can spend a lot of money on on things, but you don’t have shareholders and you can’t make a profit. So Gene, do you think that that’s an important element of AI staying as a nonprofit because it can be less. I don’t know, greedy. Yeah, I, I, I think that is part of the, the, the point is, is that it, it’s not just influenced by people who are self-interested in and, and, you know, self dealing to themselves and, and their buddies, um, but it also is like the attorney generals and the IRS saying hey you have to engage in primarily charitable activities it can’t be just purely commercial so let’s see whether you are actually engaging in charitable activities and. How how strict the regulators are and how much enforcement you can do when you’ve got limited resources, especially these days for the IRS, um, is, is another question, but, um, I’m again thankful that there is a nonprofit sector, uh, in the US. It’s not completely unique, but it it is something special that that the country needs to treasure and nonprofit radio right there as as we’re talking about, uh. Um, artificial intelligence is important to point out that it’s not all AI that is, uh, part of a nonprofit. We’re just talking about what Gene’s just talking about one company that the company, the, the nonprofit OpenAI, the one founded by Sam Altman. There are lots and lots of for-profit, uh, artificial intelligence, large language model, uh, uh. Entities, so is, you know, we’re we’re just talking about the, the open AI remaining nonprofit, which, which is very, which is promising so far, like as Gene is saying. Yeah, this is a great topic for our 750th Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio show. Tony, you’ve brought so many. Different experts onto your show. You’ve helped so many people over over 15 years. It’s just, it’s just truly truly amazing. It’s a labor of love, um, and now I get to do it each week, uh, with Kate. Um, so we’re talking about production, Kate. Well, what, uh, how do you feel, how do you feel about what we produce each week? Oh well, I always look forward to it because I get to come and meet with my uncle on Zoom and that’s always a lot of fun with my godfather, you know, I get to go bother him, um. It feels good to put something out each week, um, something that you’re obviously passionate about, and I’m starting to become passionate about it just by listening to it, to our show each week. Um, and it’s something that I can like now talk about with others and be like, hey, I’m doing this podcast with my uncle, and this is what we’re doing, and this is how we’re um helping people. No, I’m glad, I’m glad. Like you feel empowered and uh you’re spreading, spreading the word of the the value of nonprofits in our country. That’s awesome. I, I’m very glad to hear that. That’s awesome. What kind of skills have you picked up, Kate, since you’ve been doing this endeavor? Have you picked up any new skills? Well, on the more like production side, um, Tony has taught me how to use Audacity. Um, it’s not something that I personally use every day, but he was able to like teach me what he knows if I did ever want to produce something of my own, uh, vocally, so that’s pretty cool. Cause I had no clue how to do anything with like a mic. I didn’t know how to, I guess, edit my voice if I’m too loud or too soft, that kind of thing. Nice, it’s good. I’m glad, yeah, very glad. And uh in a couple of weeks, your family will be visiting and we’ll be doing the show side by side. From from my studio office every late August, yes, right. Scott, You’re gonna do another song for us. Um, I wanna remind folks you’re the best place to buy your music. It’s is it bandcamp.scottstein, did you say it’s the other way around. It’s stein.bandcamp.com. Thank you. OK, but you’re also of course on Apple, Spotify. Yes. Indeed this song intro song for us. It actually brings us back to an earlier conversation because I always tell people this is a song about what happens when like you begin by hearing your favorite song. Um, you maybe you hear it on the radio and then you hear it in a bar, and then as years pass, eventually you hear it at CVS. Yeah, so, uh, that’s, that’s what I’ll say and, and, you know, our, our, our coping mechanisms. This is, this is a newish song. Uh, it has not been recorded yet, so maybe at some point in the future it will be available commercially. And I assume my keyboard’s coming through. OK, yes. Yes, and your balance is, is very good. Yes. All right, here we go. The alarm goes off early in the morning and I roll on out of bed. Last night’s dream still running through my head. And and the day. I’m We live out on a quiet little street, on a quiet little block. Kind of Way you can leave the doors unlocked. And at the Hear the I Come I we didn’t have a kid. One Yeah First. When let’s turn I’m trying to long Yeah. Yeah. Oh No No, it’s almost And I And that’s Find Fantastic, Scott. Thank you. Driving too fast. Thank you. I’ll go a new direction, but I don’t know where, uh, I’ll find a new direction, but I don’t know where it goes. A lot of you, you see some brilliant lyrics. You do, you do some, you turn some very good phrases. Yes, outstanding. Thank you. Thank you. Scott, it was, uh, it was show number 158, uh, in 2013, September of 2013 when you first. Debuted Cheap Red wine, uh, as our as our theme song, so number 158 to 750, uh, I, I get inspiration from Cheap Red wine. I listen to it on my own time as well. Um, I just love it. I, I, I’m so glad that we got connected by the, your attorney friend and my attorney Joe Becker. Yeah, uh, and, and that the red wine is a part of nonprofit radio for so long. So thank you. Thank you. I’ll put a quick plug in. He’s going professionally now as JR Becker, author of a number of children’s books, which have done really well. So if, if you have kids, you’re looking for like thought provoking children’s, uh, excuse me, children’s books, like, yeah, his stuff is great. JR Becker, a humble you are throwing to somebody else. A lot of artists wouldn’t do that. Well, you got to have a network of people who support you, right? And, and it works when you better when you support in kind. I was very gracious. Thank you. Claire, Claire Meyerhoff, you joined your first show was show number 2. Single digits. Show number two was July 23rd of 2010, and we talked about 15. That’s amazing. We talked about storytelling and jargon. Yes, jargon jail. I developed jargon jail thanks to you. Yes, I still put folks in jargon jail. So that’s, uh, thank you very much. I love having you as a creative producer. Thank you. You’re welcome, Tony. Gene, you, you joined next, uh, you joined the show number 7, was your first show with us in August of 2010. So just a month later, uh, a month after we started show number 7, and that was the show when we had, uh, uh, um, Stephanie Strom was also on the show. She used to be, uh, she used to be the New York Times reporter, but Gene, you’ve been with us a long time. Thank you very much. It’s always been my pleasure and, and also to, to often be in jargon jail. No, well, I, I, you, you, you always skirt jargon jail cause you explain things. Amy, you joined, uh, you joined in, uh, show number 100. It was July of 2012. Yeah, the bar was high. It was like there’s live music. There’s all these other people like I guess this is the show every time. No, that was just because it was the 100th show. And, and, uh, that was my first time we announced that we had 1000 listeners. Now of course we have over 13,000 each week. But now Kate will get to experience what I got to experience in the early days of getting to sit next to each other at your microphones in the studio. Yeah, that’s right. That’s right. You can really cut Tony off on his jokes a lot faster than the Zoom does it, you know. Yeah, well, that’s not a good practice. We don’t want to do that. Uh, yes, we were both in New York City. You would, of course, we would come into Sam’s studio. We’d be side by side, and Kate joined. Kate joined in, uh, show number 645, which was June 2023. Uh, it started as something fun. I, I, I, uh, her family was visiting and I wanted to try it out because she has, she’s a trained professional and, uh, in voice and I just love the way it sounded so we’ve been with it since. That’s so sweet. Yeah, no, it’s a lot of fun. You came to me and you were like, well, I need to do my show. Do you wanna do the sponsors and kind of introduce people? And I was like, yeah, I’ll try. I was a little nervous. But then I ended up really enjoying it and you ended up enjoying it and now I’m here. Absolutely, yeah. So thanks to each of you, uh, it, it wouldn’t be. It wouldn’t be nonprofit radio without each of you, each of you, so thank you. And our listeners, I’m speaking to you, dear listener. Thank you. Thank you, thank you for your support, uh, um, talking right to you. Thank you for listening, thank you for being with us. It wouldn’t be nonprofit radio. Podcast, uh, you know, a podcast without listeners, uh, that’s called a diary. So we’re not a diary. We’re a podcast and I’m grateful that we have you as a listener with us. Thank you. But Tony, you need some gratitude also because In 15 years, I, uh, you know, I was not Claire or Jean, so, but came in at 100, so still somehow I’ve been here for 650 of these and you have changed. The show has evolved, you It’s hard to change. Humans are not good at change, and you have been open to change, to supporting the sector, to meeting people where they are, and I just want to give you some flowers. Thank you. Thanks very much, Amy. It, it, it’s, it’s, it’s a, it’s a, it’s an honor to do the show and to help our community. And so I’m, that’s why I’m grateful to each of you for helping us because we’re all contributing, we’re all helping the nonprofit community. We’re doing it through Tony Martignetti nonprofit Radio. Claire, you have a little ode to radio. I do, Tony, because I’ve just known you for so long and every year we talk about this anniversary show. Oh, what are we gonna do? And we’ve done skits, right? We’ve done like all kinds of crazy things, quizzes and skits over the years. So this year I thought I would just write you a little poem. So here is my ode, it’s on my. On my phone. Here is my ode to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. So many shows, thousands here. 13,000 people. 15th year. It’s a podcast to help nonprofit folks with shared expertise peppered with jokes, show after show, guest after guest, Tony features only the best. 15 years now, an epic feat. 750 shows, each one a treat. Because Tony strives for podcast perfection. All is moving in the right direction to host a podcast week after week takes commitment and time. It’s not for the meek. It’s for a guy like Tony who cares a great deal, cuts through the noise, keeps it real, hosting his show with zeal and zest, educating, pontificating, and all the rest. Well, this ode is now nearing its end, written by Claire, Tony’s longtime friend. So Tony, for you, I offer three cheers and for nonprofit radio, best wishes for the next 15 years. Thank you, Claire Zeal and zest. Thank you, Claire. That’s very sweet. I wrote, I wrote that last night while watching Boardwalk Empire, which I love. I sat there and came up with my little poem on my, on my iPhone, and you know, I was inspired all about this, you know, radio show because this happens to be the 40th anniversary of Live Aid, which was the huge contest, uh, concert at Wembley Stadium in in London to benefit, um, you know, the problems in Africa with, you know, starvation and the situation. And you know, Queen performed this massive 21 minute set that’s just epic that that people watch over and over again. And, you know, when when Freddie Mercury sings the Radio Gaga and and that and that song, it’s it’s really an ode to radio, which at the time. You know, radio was being threatened by this new MTV thing and and music videos and would radio die. And I can’t believe in 1983 that they wrote this song, especially these lyrics in it, you’ve had about radio, you’ve had your time, you’ve had your power, you’ve yet to have your finest hour. What did Queen mean by that? In 1982, the finest hour. But it possibly have been, I don’t know, looking into the future and being podcast. And all we hear is. There is Wow. Uh their, their own tribute to radio, absolutely right, yeah. I’m gonna cry. Someone still loves you. That’s all. Um, I’ve, I’ve heard that, uh, I’ve saw, I saw in a couple places that uh Lady Gaga is named for that song. Her, her love of that song, uh, is why she chose Lady Gaga. Um, so, oh, Claire, thank you again for the ode. Oh, I’m glad you like it, you know, I’m not much of a poet, and I know it, but I have written many a birthday, bridal shower, funeral. I’ve written lots of lots of poems for friends when they say I don’t know what I’m gonna say, I’ll say, well, you know, let’s write a little poem and I’ll I’ll come up with a little, just a little little poem like that little ode to my friend Tony. Who works so hard because people don’t realize the amount of work that goes into a podcast, to booking guests, to, you know, actually, you know, organizing the whole thing, writing it, you know, all the little things that go into it and for Tony, for you to do it week after week. 750 shows, 50 shows a year. And some people can manage like one podcast a month. They, you know, they do a podcast for a little while and it falls off. There was an article in the New York Times a few years ago that said like the average podcast, remember that, Tony, that the average podcast only lasted like so long and then it and then it fell off. Well, look, um, I, Michelle Obama’s podcast did not last. We had Bruce Springsteen and Barack Obama had a podcast together. They, yeah, and all, both of those podcasts, Michelle Obama was by herself, uh, Barack and Bruce had were co-hosts. Those two podcasts, uh, are, are survived by Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. We started before them and we’re continuing and they’ve, uh, they’ve, they’ve tanked. You know, I, I’ve read about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and how they, they got this great deal with Spotify, right, to do all these podcasts. But they could never really get it done. They just did like a little bit and I read that, you know, they would go into meetings and, and have these highfalutin ideas about like, oh, let’s interview like Putin and Trump together. Like that wouldn’t that be a great podcast? Well, yeah, that would be a great podcast. But do you like know these people, can you, can you book these guests? And your podcast failed, you know, as far as I know, and then Spotify just said, you know, see you, because it’s the content. Like, if you can’t make the content, it doesn’t matter who you are. If you can’t create that content, if you can’t show up week after week and get your guests to show up, because that’s, that’s a hard thing is to book the guests and get the time and, and, uh, put it all together. Well, that’s why radio was such an important influence for me because the shows I mentioned and, and just every, every radio show has to, has to produce some daily like the Brian Lehrer Show, uh, it was daily and still is, and, uh, Car Talk was weekly, but you know, the, you know, again, those early influences and every other, every other show I used to listen to, uh, on WNEW, you know, the hosts had to show up for their 4 hour block, right, every day. And I guess, you know, that’s the, that’s the inspiration that’s why it’s Tony Martignetti nonprofit. Radio 750 shows. Wow. And that’s 15 years. So in, in 15 more years, we’ll have what, 1500 shows in 15 years. How old will we be? Uh, we will. I’ll be 78. Oh my God, we can do that. We can do that. I’ll, I’ll, I’m gonna keep working until I become a dinosaur and nobody will hire me anymore. But that’s, that has nothing to do with nonprofit radio. The podcast will continue even after I’m a dinosaur. All right, um, the time has come for me to say thank you. Thanks very much for every, for you being with us for the 7 50th. I look forward to these every single year for a month in advance. Uh, we’ve been counting down on the show. Kate knows, uh, 334 weeks ago I started counting down every single show. It’s 2 weeks away, so. Uh, we’re here. So thank you. Thanks to each of you, and again, thank you to our listeners. Thank you for listening to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. We, we wouldn’t be a podcast without you. We, we’d be a diary. Scott, this beautiful song that I licensed, so, so glad, as I said, that, uh, uh, now, uh, JR JR Burton, is it Becker JR Becker brought us together, uh, cheap red wine. Uh, I, I love adding it to the beginning and end of each and every show, please. Well, thank you so much. I’m happy to do it and congratulations. 750, my goodness. So thank you. All right, here we go. just keep on talking I. romantic advice from a I’m looking for I’m a. Now promise Liver diamonds. They won’t tight to the kind of clothing that I wear. I. I’m I Does promises the people can kiss our asses. No a Oh Oh. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this glorious live music is by Scott Stein. Yeah. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Oh bye. Be with us next week for nonprofit radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be cool. Always so much better lives, Scott. Oh, thank you.

Nonprofit Radio for April 28, 2025: #25NTC & The Human Factors Driving Your CRM Success

Amy Sample Ward#25NTC

We launch our 25NTC coverage with the CEO of NTEN, which hosts the Nonprofit Technology Conference, sharing the numbers and the experience of this year’s Conference, earlier this month in Baltimore, Maryland. They’re Amy Sample Ward, and they’re also Nonprofit Radio’s technology contributor.

 

Rubin Singh: The Human Factors Driving Your CRM Success

Don’t blame your tech first when it feels like your CRM database is letting you down. Human beings, the tech users, have responsibilities that precede, and must align with, your technology. Rubin Singh returns to enlighten us about business processes; inclusive design; personal and professional growth; and more human factors that impact the success of your CRM database. He’s founder and CEO of OneTenth Consulting.

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

 

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. We’re kicking off our 25 NTC coverage this week. These two segments are both from 25 NTC. It was a wonderful conference. I think the best. Uh, this was, I believe, the 11th year that I’ve hosted nonprofit radio, uh, in a studio at the nonprofit technology conference, and I think this was the best one. You’ll hear Amy and I talk about that. So excited, legitimately, you know, some people say, uh, I’m excited. No, I’m excited that we are launching, inaugurating, kicking off our 25 NTC coverage this week. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer the effects of ramidenia if you pained me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer Kate with what’s coming. Hey Tony, this week it’s 25 NTC. The CEO of N10, which hosts the nonprofit technology conference, shares the numbers and the experience of this year’s nonprofit technology conference last week in Baltimore, Maryland. They are Amy Sample Ward, and they are also nonprofit Radio’s technology contributor. Then the human factors driving your CRM success. Don’t blame your tech first when it feels like your CRM database is letting you down. Human beings, the tech users, have responsibilities that proceed and must align with your technology. Rubin Singh returns to enlighten us about business processes, inclusive design, personal and professional growth, and more human factors that impact the success of your CRM database. He’s founder and CEO of 10th Consulting. On Tony’s take 2. Tales from the gym. Meet Roy. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. DonorBox, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. Here is 25 NTC. Hello and welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit Radio coverage. Oh wait, I should do what Amy loves. Hello and welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. What a genuine pleasure to welcome. The CEO of N10, the host of the 2025 nonprofit technology conference, Amy Sample Ward, welcome. Thank you. I don’t know that I’ve ever gotten to see in person witness live the Podfather intro. So yeah, exactly, it doesn’t have the same power, you know. Uh, so, uh, we’re here at 25 NTC. We’re at the uh Baltimore Convention Center. Oh, I, I should have said that our coverage here is sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. Very grateful to Heller Consulting. How’s the conference going? CEO. It’s going great from community perspective, you know, I think we didn’t really know what to expect in this moment right from the community perspective, yes, I mean you know there’s always special things um there’s always opportunities to continue refining. Uh, but you know, from the, from the community side and kind of what we spend so much time focusing on, you know, the community experience, we just, you know, would anyone actually. Feel like coming when they woke up Wednesday morning would be, you know, like are is anyone even gonna be in a space to have conversations or wanna go to a session, you know, and we’re not trying to pretend that everything is fine and normal or that those things exist, you know. I like we’re certainly embracing that and yet we’re trying to embrace it within a reality of well we’ve all planned for this conference to be here so so it is still a a structured thing and and how porous can we make it in real time together to also meet whatever needs are emerging by maybe going to a session that was already planned and you know the speaker had prepared but from that conversation came something. Oh my gosh, we, we need a space, we need to keep talking about this right now and what do we do, right? So I’ve heard a couple of stories like that anecdotally that I’ve got I’ve learned so much I need to learn more now and you realized what I didn’t know and I I need to connect with that person or, you know, um, I heard it from an audience, uh, like talking to somebody who was sitting next to the person who was talking to me and then also to this for. Speaker, I, you know, I need to connect with, I forget whether it’s him or her or whatever. It doesn’t matter. Um, I need to learn more from this person. Alright, let’s let’s, uh, you know, I always like to ask you the numbers you know how many folks are with us here in real life in Baltimore, Maryland. I don’t know that I actually have the accurate numbers. We, we’re. Uh, 1800 registrants overall, but given how many shifts are happening, I don’t know exactly, and, well, I’ll finish my first sentence and then I’ll add a second so I don’t know how many folks are necessarily in person because we don’t. Require if you’re in person you have access to the virtual and so folks that couldn’t come for whatever reason didn’t necessarily have to tell us that so we don’t totally know or they could have even come one day and then gone virtual another day that’s right so I don’t totally know how many folks are in the room. I know that I think catering told us that over 1600. Silverware were used at lunch today. So just for lunch today I guess that yeah I know I only used one and I used one upstairs even so it’s a proxy for right so that’s how many people ate lunch I guess. OK, um, talking about the conference experience, uh, we’re gonna bring in someone who was a previous guest Aia Aria Ma, come on, come on, Arya. you can share my mic, just share my mic. Yeah, let’s make it easier. Um, because this is her first NTC, and I, I, she was saying, she was saying things that I think you would want to hear as CEO. So I said, if you want to come back, well, it’s not gonna be quite that long, but, uh, yeah, it’s not gonna be quite that long, but thank you. Uh, if you wanna talk to the CEO, let Amy know that, that, uh, what, how you feel about your first NTC. So this is Ama. Um, her company, uh, are, are you just, you say your company, so I don’t have to look back two pages. OK, I’m, I’m the principal consultant founder of Lunara, so I do consulting with environmental conservation nonprofits. Um, first of all, thank you. This has been amazing. I’m actually from Baltimore, so just jot down from Boston, do a quick family trip, and the people here, I feel. Like NDC really has curated an amazing group of people where it’s not really about networking but really connecting and knowledge sharing the accessibility here it really feels like the staff are here looking out for the for the participants and it’s just been an amazing time connecting with people the bird like the feathers of a bird table conversations, the comfy chairs like this is I’ve been to a lot of conferences. And it’s definitely one of a kind. So thank you so much for curating an amazing team, curating amazing people who come here. It’s been a really great time for me. All right, thank you so much for being thank you for being one of those amazing people that is here, right? Thank you. I so appreciate that. Of course, of course, lots more NTCs in your future. OK, good. Thank you. Thanks for coming back. Glad you did. I, yeah, a little treat for you. I knew I knew you would want to hear something. Thank you. You’re welcome. Um, So, oh, I turned up for that was turned it up for our, yeah, OK, um, alright, so we have about 1800 people. Well let’s call it 1800 between friends, just as a round number. That’s good. OK yeah, we, I mean, I think there were like 12 people who just showed up and registered on site yesterday, so. Yeah, the number is a moving. When we talked a couple of weeks ago, you said people just show up. I was amazed at that. OK, it happens. OK. There’s always room at the NTC, you know. Yeah, well, we’ll add another chair. What did Ari just say? There’s a staff. Thank you for the staff, looking, looking out for all of us. Yes, of course. We’re accommodating. We’re, we, I’m a member, so I’m not staff, but I’m, I’m part of the N10 the N10 community. I don’t want to call it the the NTC people call you NTC. Yeah, I know Amy. She runs NTC in a way they, they, yeah, um. The commons experiment, yeah, I mean, I hope like we could talk about it for a minute. I’m just gonna preempt your intro and say for people who run conferences as part of the larger work of your organization, right, not that not that you’re an event planner, but people who are listening to the show and have organizations that have conferences as a part of your programming. Would love to learn what you are testing because we, as I said the other day you know there’s that like analogy or whatever like oh I pulled the band-aid off and just you know tried something we we found every band-aid and we pulled them all off at once and tested everything is is different this year. There is not an exhibit hall with pipe and drape and 10 by 10 squares that you have to walk through, uh, hallway hallways of corridors of, uh, it’s an open space, open plan. The studio here is set up right behind all the chairs that are facing the stage where the main stage where all the keynotes are and the awards were given. Um, we’re by the food station. Well, the food is here. It’s just the the hall is open. There’s not anything dividing us. Yeah, we sold no exhibit booth packages. Uh, and I admire it, I admire the attempt at change. Look, even if you, I’m not, you’re gonna decide as a team what you’re gonna do, but even if you went back to 10 by 10 cubes, uh, pipe and drape next year, I would still admire the 2025 experiment because you are trying something that radically different. You’re not bound by what every other conference does and what you. Uh, what N10 has done year after year after year for 24 years, this is our 25th, your 25th NTC. So you’re not bound by, by your own history even. I just, I admire the outward look, the fresh look, even if you go back to the way it was last year, I still will never stop admiring what you did this year. Thank you for saying that. I mean, I think. It in some ways was was and is a huge risk to say we don’t we’re not even selling packages that would equate to hundreds of thousands of dollars of revenue um so if anyone’s listening and would like to write a check, please let me know um. But it just didn’t feel like that hard of a choice for us because it feels like every year all we want is to get closer and closer to an experience for as many people as possible to be in community and we, you know, getting rid of the booths was just one thing there’s also, you know, sessions are working in different ways and there’s. More furniture in this room that is not from the convention center, you know, it’s not rounds with chairs. We actually rented every piece of furniture from a local furniture company, um, just to, I can say the name that’s my show, not the Freeman Company. We’re not we’re not using that. We actually have put on an entire, you know, 1800 person conference in a convention center without a decorator, um, so we. Did everything ourselves so that we could control and make it just how we wanted it to be. You rented how many chairs you found a source for all these, all the everything, yes, every, every vendor is local, every maker is local. Yeah, you have a little shop. There’s there’s a market, local, local vendors that yesterday I saw cutting boards, uh, I see art, uh, that’s all I saw, but there’s a market over there, local, local vendors love it. You, you also do something smart that I learned, uh, one of your team members told me. That uh you you have your staff retreat in the city where or one of your annual retreats in the city where next year’s NTC is gonna be that’s very smart that way all everybody has walked the building we’ve all stood there and said, do we think this is really where badge printing could go? Do we really think this is. Because we also make basically every decision as a team for the conference, so you know there’s no one person on staff whose job is the conference and they get to make the decisions we we do it together or we say who wants to be in this decision, you know I think we’ve even talked about some of the the way Zen10 works um on the show before but. Yeah, so it feels good to have everybody be there, which means this late summer, early fall we’ll all party in Detroit and see what 26 NTC is gonna look like. OK, 26 NDC NTC in Detroit. Uh, no, it’s very smart and you’ve walked out. in the hotels we can make a couple of restaurant suggestions if somebody comes up because we, yeah, yeah, we went to that place. Yeah, very savvy, very savvy. I admire it. I don’t know. I just feel like I would never have thought of that. Like if I was a CEO I would, I wouldn’t need somebody else to suggest that. I think I never would have thought of that. Can I ask you a question? Do I get, is that allowed on nonprofit radio? OK, OK. I had an anarchist in the previous, uh, OK, I was gonna ask you, you know, I know, I mean with 160 plus sessions every year you have a hard job of only doing 30 or so interviews or or 20 or whatever the number is, right? Yeah, yeah, because it’s that’s only a fraction of how many sessions you could have um chosen from. But even still, I’m curious from the interviews you’ve had from, from a day and a half or so. This is content different this year? Like, is there, is there trends or or interesting notes surfacing because of the time we’re in, because of the moment we’re in the moment of under this administration, the the shifts of of the sector, but also even just like this weird moment around AI and the moment around, you know, all of those different pieces, is there something that you’ve seen? Artificial intelligence, yes, more panels on artificial intelligence. I, I requested more so we’ll have a couple more um. Yeah, I, that’s that’s what I was thinking it’s artificial intelligence, um, you know, the, the political environment, it comes out a little bit, but, uh, first of all, a lot of our, well, yeah, no, it comes out you know of course beyond the fundraising, uh, I was gonna say the fundraising panels have mentioned it, you know, but, but, um. Uh, also in the tech, uh, we just had a panel on personally identifiable information, how to preserve that, um, and including from government intrusion and subpoena, um, so you know that would not have been a topic last year would have been a thought, a possibility, um, so yeah, I’d say those mostly the AI and then the the the political and the, um, data, data protection, data protection, yeah, yeah. Um, Is uh is is Max here? Max stage managing? No, he hasn’t for a number of years a few years yes, yes, and I didn’t see Or Louise here. No, she, it’s not her spring break. Oregon already had spring break, so she is very mad to miss her first. TC. Oh, is this the first one? I think so many years at least, or yeah, I think so. She’s about to be 9. That’s right, yeah, yeah, I guess she missed Denver too because that was she was in school then, but yeah, so those are the only two that she’s ever missed, yes, even as a little babe, yeah, so we don’t have like a family photo booth photo from this, yeah, she has them like up on her, on her, you know, cork board in her bedroom. Yeah, I know he has all the NTG. In like the photo, you know, yeah, parent, yes. Um, How’s, uh, you know? How, how are things, uh, how’s the team, how’s the team doing? Thank you for asking. Um. I, I’m just looking because they’re in that room. That’s our, that’s our staff office so that we can see if there’s any issues, but that’s where everybody’s working the halls on fire or something. You’ll see it’s like a uh um called um smoke towers or fire towers. So, so we’re on, we’re we’re down on the floor, but up maybe 40 ft or something there’s windows and that you’re saying that’s the it’s like in the mall, you know, where the security is behind the one-way glass up above, yeah, that’s, yeah, so staffs up there’s too high, we can’t see in you know staff is OK, I think. Like Any any organizations group of staff, you know, there’s. A staff person dealing with this other issue that’s not work related and somebody you know caring for a relative and somebody trying to help their kid that’s having this struggle is that you know so. Uh, the team is OK. We’re a great team and folks have just been like. Even reflecting in real time like God we’re just like showing up for each other so strong and we feel so like happy to get to show up for each other these these few days together but also try to hold that like you know behind that or underneath that or around that. Life is hard for everyone right now in so many ways that have nothing to do with putting on a conference or or replying to your work emails or you know it’s just like everyone is always carrying these these other things that they’re thinking about um and we know and we’ve and we’ve heard from community members as we do every year that. We want the NTC to be a place where like you can set all those burdens down like it’s OK to talk about all of that stuff you know this is not like a perfect professional face you know like what does that mean? What what is my professional? I don’t know. You know, but also I think it’s a little bit hard for staff to feel like they get to do that too when we’re working so hard to create that space for the community because we’re also like on radio and calling catering and you know we’re like doing all these other logistic pieces so in some ways the staff like miss out on the on the best opportunity to do that that we have every year because we we’re we’re kind of behind the scenes but usually on Friday. Less logistics are happening because it’s the final day of the conference and then you know all but one or two people will get to be at the general session and listen to the keynote and everybody will get to like just go to a bird’s table at lunch or go you know people will really get to kind of come out and and. Enjoy it for a little bit. And when does the team depart on Saturday? Yeah, we fly out on Saturday. Oh yeah, we’ll, I mean Friday, Friday afternoon. Oh yeah, our stuff is getting palletized and taken away at 3 p.m. tomorrow. Oh yeah, yeah. Oh yeah, yes, and like we have volunteers, we have, you know, we have um. I mean it’s end 10. We have a spreadsheet, you know, and every storage bin is numbered and we know what goes in bin number 1 and bin number 2 and you know you just look at the spreadsheet and everybody knows what has to go. I see. Of course we have a spreadsheet for that. Yeah, wonderful, um. Yeah, I would say, and I’ve told others this, uh, this is, this is, I think this is the 11th, uh, NTC that nonprofit radio has come to, yeah, uh, I think it’s the best. I do, I do, you’re just saying that because I’m sitting here and I’ll push you off the yoga ball. I said it to somebody else. No, it’s, yeah, you know, you know, uh, no, I really do admire the open plan. I love. It’s, yeah, it’s just a better feeling, you know it’s not a congested feeling we’re not confined to a 10 by 10 cell. Right and like just from an attendee’s perspective, you know, we didn’t want to shrink it down to only a room of 1800 chairs in theater seating or something, you know, like there’s all this open space. Do you wanna just sit on the floor and build Lego? Go for it, you know, you wanna drag a chair away from a table and talk to somebody else? Go for it. Right, we, we, it’s called a pre-con when before you have an event we have a meeting with, you know, the head of every part of the facility, right, uh, like here’s the security, right, like, you know, one rep from every part of the building comes and you have this precon meeting. And they are like, OK, who are you? it’s like just the day before or a couple of days before or is this we do we do it, no, no, no, we do it Monday so you’re on site, you’re like ready to go. You’re starting to load in and usually events that do this like send one rep from N10 right? we send all of us, all 16 of us show up because each of us are here, right? And you’re supposed to say like, you know, is there any info about your attendees? Is there anything the team should know, you know, and we say. If our attendees want a chair move, that chair is moving. Right, you’re not radioing me for like an approval. If attendees walk up to you and say the water is out, you’re refilling the water, right? Like this community is making the space. Our job was just to make sure water stored in there 16 of us right that you can take direction from, yes, and I mean if they say we’d like a whole another part of the building and could you bring catering there that please don’t do without our approval. Right, but we really want to have a, a place that is just open. Make it. Do put the chair where you want it to be, right? Like Ryan, bring your penguins and set them up. Apparently everybody’s like putting in the chat who gets to take them home, you know, like that feels like a gift to ourselves and hopefully a contribution that’s additive to the sector to to have a space that’s like that or that tries to say. What does it look like? We’re, we’re not a trade show. We’ve never been an actual trade show, but what does it look like to say, yeah, there’s no booths, just talk to each other. And honestly like there are some providers who are here for the very first time and they’re like what? What am I doing? What, what am I supposed to do, right? So we need to do a better job of setting people up whether they’re a provider or a sponsor or just, you know, attendee what to expect, what do you, what does it mean to just walk into this huge room and pick, pick a velvet couch to sit on and talk to somebody, you know, but just walk up yeah um. I, I, I just heard someone’s heels. I, I looked because I thought I heard pickle. I thought it was pickleball, but there is pickleball here. We have there’s pickle ball. There’s ping pong. Oh yes, and the pickle ball tournament yesterday, you know, it ended in, I’m not gonna say controversy, um, but it was heated because E0’s very own Carl came in 2nd place and he desperately would like that trophy. Is there a rule about employees? No, no, no, no, but Carl keeps he has spent a year reminding everyone that last year in pickleball he lost in the first round, but to the eventual winner. Right, it’s just, it’s just like, you know, the, the drama of a bracket process and so he wanted to redeem himself this year, right? He made it all the way to section. Yes, right, Carl. Alright, alright, and Carl is celebrating, I think, 18 years as an N0 staff person. He’s our IT director. He started as an AmeriCorps Vista. That’s incredible. Yeah, is he the longest? He’s the longest. And then how many years are you since membership I’ve been, I’ve been, I started at the NTC like the, you know, two days before 11 NTC was my first day as membership directors, um, and, and Ailey’s right behind me at 13. 0, she’s she’s outstanding. She curated this table that we’re sitting at. Uh, she got the chairs that we’re sitting on, um, she chose this spot for you all to be able to see everybody coming in visibility. Yes, it’s very nice. Yeah, Ali on her game, her thank you. All right, I know you’re busy. Thank you, CEO. I hope Aria was a nice surprise. It was such a gift. Thank you for doing that. I so appreciate it. I’m gonna tell the whole team with our at our daily debrief, um, and. And I look forward to the next time Gene and I get to be on the show and I have slept in some reasonable amount of hours prior to talking into the microphone, but I really value you being here and creating a digital platform for so many of our community members to get to share, you know, all of their smarts beyond these walls. So thanks for thanks for the collaboration. Yeah, lots more. OK. Amy Semple Ward, they’re the CEO of N10. They’re our technology contributor here at uh nonprofit Radio. Thank you. Um, and thank you for correcting me, parent, parent, yeah, yeah, you’re right. I mean, I know you’re right, but thank you for the, thank you for the correction. I’m, I’m a trainable boomer. You’re very trainable. We’ll leave it there. Thank you also for being uh with with uh nonprofit Radio’s coverage of 25 NTC where we are sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s Donor Box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you, a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges. Helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs. Helping you, help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now it’s time for the human factors driving your CRM success. Welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 25 NTC, the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference. We’re at the Baltimore Convention Center, where we are sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. My guest now is Ruben Singh. He is founder and CEO of 1/10 Consulting. Ruben, welcome back to nonprofit Radio. Thanks for having me, Tony. Good to see you again. This is, I think your 3rd, maybe 4th, 4th you’re counting, you’re more accurate than I am. Um, your session this year is the human factors driving nonprofit CRM success. Uh, I don’t know, I wonder, do you see people often or organizations often blaming technology when the problem is more team and human? Yeah, that’s exactly the the premise of it, Tony. I, I, um, uh, I’ve I’ve often found myself as a consultant coming into situations where Um, you know, the client we’re working with at the prospect we’re speaking with says, ah, we need Salesforce or we need, you know, uh, this particular solution or virtuous or something else, um, and, uh, you know, because they’ve had a bad experience with the technology that they were with, uh, and so, uh, as I’ve seen this so much throughout my career, um, and then you know you start peeling back the layers of the onions. And then you see, oh well, you know, the business processes are not fully defined. There’s not, you know, a plan for adoption, there’s not a plan for governance, uh, and so what I’ve realized is that, um, often times, uh, where the, the, the failures happen have really has nothing to do with the technology at all. So yes, that’s exactly what the premises of this uh of this um workshop. So the symptom I don’t know, cycling through, uh, platforms like, oh we need Salesforce, and then they have Salesforce for 3 or 4 years and then they realize, oh, no, Salesforce wasn’t really the solution. Now we need we need the Microsoft platform, right? Does it happen like that? That’s definitely a part of it. I think there’s also, you know, just there’s always this sense of urgency um as new technology comes along. Um, that uh we don’t, if we don’t innovate, we’re gonna fall behind, um, and we’re seeing a lot with, you know, AI now as well. Um, it’s, it’s no different, you know, everyone say well if you’re not using AI for your solutions, uh, you know, you’re, you’re gonna be left behind, you’re gonna, your organization’s gonna fail when really. Um, that is, that is really forcing organizations to adopt certain things that they’re not, they may not be ready for their, their processes may not be in place, their data might not be ready. So, um, so just like we’re seeing right now with, you know, the latest trend of technology, um, feel the organizations we work with just feel compelled to to to rush into whatever the particular trend is, um, and sometimes there’s business pressure also. Uh, you know, if this particular system failed, you know, new, new CTO comes in and says, ah, I need to prove myself or I need to get something going, so oftentimes they try to get the, the, the cart before the horse. You mentioned business processes a couple of times. What what kind of processes should we, so now we’re getting to what the human factors are that you need to have in place for the technology to be successful for the CRM. Well, what kinds of business processes are you looking for? Sure. Well, um, first, are they defined, are they documented? You’d be surprised how many nonprofits I walk into where, you know, they could be operating just fine, um, but there’s no nothing really documented and that’s fine, that’s where, you know, consultants like ourselves who would come in and help, uh, understand them, review them, define them. Um, and then there’s some that are just, uh, not very, uh, as you as you learn more about their business processes, you see that there’s, um, just inefficiencies, uh, that are there as well. So what kinds of business processes are we talking about? Just some examples. Yeah, um, fundraising, for example, so check come, you know, stack of checks come in, you know, what are the different processes to get that data entered into the system, or it might be donor advised funds, you know, what is the process around that? Or you know, we have a uh uh a series of files that need to be uploaded or it could be an application. process for programs uh that that might be so it it it could be um the grant distribution process what’s the reviews and applications that process who needs to review, who needs to approve before a grant might be approved. So, um, so there’s really a cross grant making fundraising program delivery um there’s there’s all kinds of steps that needed to happen and we ultimately want the the system, the technology to make it work as efficiently as possible. So we we we heavily rely on business processes to make sure that we’re. Um, that we’re creating things that ultimately makes the systems more efficient. So the technology is supporting the business processes not not we’re not relying on the technology for the business process, but it’s, it’s supplementing what our processes are. That’s exactly it. I would, I would add one more thing to that, you know, in addition to the technology supporting the business process, it also has to support the strategy. So that’s kind of one of the other points that we’re gonna be talking about later on today. Um, is to make sure that there’s a clear strategy. What is it that as an organization you’re trying to solve, um, how do you know that you’re successful? What are those markers or indicators to confirm that you’ve, that you’ve, you’re successful because we want again the technology to support that, uh, we want the technology to be able to track and report and monitor to make sure you’re meeting your goals, so. Uh, as a technologist, it’s a little bit tricky sometimes because they, they, you know, the clients often expect us to come in with a technical solution and, you know, code this and configure that, but we, we like to kind of step back and say, you know, what is it that you’re trying to solve? What’s your strategy? How do things work? Where can we create some efficiencies, then we start building. OK. Yeah, it’s it’s, it’s often important to have that consultant perspective to take a step back because you’re, you’re probably often. Uh, at 110th Consulting, and I’m, I’m gonna ask you to remind listeners why it’s 110. I think I remember, but we’ll get to that, we’ll get to that shortly. Um, you know, you’re, you’re often, um, confronted with, you know, we need, we need new technology. That is not our, that’s not our feedback. Amy. It is, it is feedback. OK. OK. There we go. Thank you. Oh, can you just try it with a lower volume? We’re uh we’re we’re, you can tell we’re live here at we’re, we’re just turning on the loudspeaker because the plenary session just ended, so we have a we have a loudspeaker and it was feeding back. OK, so that was us, that was us. Tala. All right, we’re accountable. I’m accountable. I feedback. It’s time for Tony’s Take too. Thank you, Kate. We’ve got a new tale from the gym introducing you to Roy. Uh, I met Roy by. Same way I hear about lots of people, uh, overhearing other people talking about Roy, uh, after he had left. And I know who he is. I’ve, I’ve seen him around. Uh, I’d say Roy is probably early to mid 70s. And the, the thing that the uh the two guys talking about Roy were focused on. Was that, um, well, he talks a lot, I agree. Uh, and he doesn’t put the weights away after he uses this one machine that he focuses on a lot, spends a lot of time on, and, and he actually grunts a lot when he’s on this bench press type machine. Uh, I had not noticed that he doesn’t take the weights off like you’re supposed to, but these two, guys did, uh, as well as talking about how chatty he is, and, you know, that he, he like, uh, just spends too much time in between his sets. Talking to other people. Maybe even annoying other people, uh, they did, they didn’t say that, but. They didn’t like how much he talks, and they don’t like that he doesn’t put the weights away. So I was, uh, so I was keeping an eye on Roy, you know, after I saw, I saw him again, and, um, word must have got to him about the weight part. Uh, he didn’t, he didn’t talk any less, still very chatty between sets. But he did start putting his weights away after he was done, takes them off the machine, puts them back on the rack where they get stored. So that’s good. So Roy did uh improve his bad gym behavior. Now, how did he get wind of the idea? That he’s not. Practicing good gym etiquette, I don’t know. Uh, I, I, I had nothing to do with it. I just stay out and listen and, and I happened to watch well, cause I heard about Roy once I learned his name, so then I was paying more attention, and that’s when I saw that he, he, uh, exercised good gym etiquette. So, but how he came to change his ways, I don’t know. I swear I had nothing to do with it. So that’s Roy at the gym, uh, along with many of our other characters I’ve introduced you to, uh, through the, through the many months. Roy at the gym, the community gym where I work out, uh, 44 times a week. And that is Tony’s take 2. OK. Are you sure you haven’t spoken to Roy before? Because he sounds familiar. I don’t think so. You might be, you might be thinking of Rob, Rob. There was Rob. He was the Marine Corps. Remember Semper Fi? He was talking to a another former Marine, and they ended their conversation with Semper Fi, the the Marine Corps motto. You might be thinking of Rob. I, I’ve seen Roy, but I never knew his name. OK. Hm. A lot of our names that are short. Well, it’s a couple. Try to keep track of all the characters at the community gym where I go, try to, maybe we should start a database. We should do, maybe we should start a CRM database. We said. We’ve got Fuku butlers more time. Here’s the rest of the human factors driving your CRM success with Rubin Singh. So you’re often confronted with our technology sucks, you know, we need this platform is not working for us. Nobody, I don’t know, nobody ever seemed to have learned it right. It doesn’t, it doesn’t work with what we’re doing, what we’re trying to do, and but you need to step back and say that there may very well be something deeper than your platform. OK. Absolutely, and you know there there’s there’s that and and I’d say also there’s been times if I’m being totally honest, Tony, where I’ve don’t don’t don’t be disingenuous, don’t lie to no I can’t do that, um, but, uh, you know, I’ve I’ve been part of teams early, early in my career where, um, you know, we have, we’ve completed the project. We have finished on time, we’ve finished on budget, we checked all the boxes for all the requirements that we met, but at the end of the project, at the end of the go live, honestly I, I felt kind of uncomfortable. I felt uneasy. I felt sick to my stomach because I knew that despite all the things that we’ve done for the technology, the nonprofit is not set up for success in the long run. Uh, some of the ways that I sense that were, um, they, you know, maybe all the users were really excited about the technology, but maybe the leadership was not fully on board, so they may not have, um, you know, they have not modified their processes, how they’re gonna do reporting, how they’re going to measure progress, how they’re going to measure performance, um, if they’re not really bought into the system, um, the whole thing’s going to fail. Um, also another key thing is governance. For leadership, the leadership buy-in is essential, uh, I think we may have talked about, or if it wasn’t you, it was another NTC how to get that leadership. It’s, if, if, if the leadership isn’t committed, leaders who are listening, CEOs, uh, executive directors listening, if you’re not completely committed, I mean your teams, your teams know that they figure it out and their commitment, uh, uh, is gonna be equivalent to yours for sure. If you could spend tens of $1000 on a on a new CRM system, if not more, but if you as a leader are gonna say, OK, you know, fundraising meeting, you know, fundraising, you know, check-in is going to be on Monday and everybody bring your spreadsheets, um, forget, you can forget the investment that you made in that CRM system, you’ve lost adoption right there holistic look remind us why your your company is one. Yeah, you know, well, um, you know, we’ve exclusively worked with nonprofits and, and very early in our, in our startup phase, uh, we worked with a lot of, um, uh, faith-based organizations, um, and, uh, it was, it was funny that as I was working with different organizations whether it was a synagogue or a church or a mosque or or cordura. Um, they all seem to have this 10% concept, this giving back of 10%, uh, to back to the community, back to causes, back to the good of, of the whole, um, and I thought that, you know, despite all these different faith traditions being so different, there was something that was, uh, you was a common thread amongst many of them, and so that’s kind of where 1/10 the consulting came from, yeah. I had it close. I thought it was, I thought it was giving I was giving back, but giving back 1/10. Yes, exactly, exactly, um, you, you, uh, your session description talks about inclusive design as a as a means to. Achieve the the CRM success that we’re looking for. Uh, say, say more about the design process, inclusivity. Yeah, well, well, we feel strongly that any technology that is meant for everyone should uh include as many people as possible as part of the design, otherwise, um, there’s gonna be blind spots. Um, uh, you know, this might seem, uh, you know, unrelated, but I was reading some stories about how when Um, uh, there’s crash test dummies, um, were being used, um, to test the safety of vehicles. They were based on a male body of 5′ 970 pounds and, um, the, and as is the 2011 University of Virginia study that showed that women were much more likely to be harmed or hurt in an accident. Um, than men were and 47% more it was like a pretty ridiculous number, so, um, just makes you wonder like when, when these vehicles and safety were designed and assessed, were they really thinking about different body types, different people? Well, the same thing applies to, you know, technology, um, the story I often give people is, um, you know, even my own parents, my, my elderly, uh, you know, parents, you know, from an immigrant community when they signed up for the COVID vaccine. Um, it was a process that was clearly not designed for immigrants and it was not designed for elderly, um, you know, it was, it was a the application form was very, uh, cumbersome. There was a lot of information you had to have, have prepared you cited this in a year or two in the past, yeah, the online form was not, uh, well, not user friendly for 70 or 80 year old, yeah, yeah, and so. Um, and, and so like, and then you, you also hear that uh well the immigrant communities are not signing up for the vaccine and, and it’s a public health problem. So, um, you know we feel that CRM is the same day is the same way that um it often times I walk into a room for a design session and I have the IT professionals there or because they’re the ones who can give us the quickest answers, um, or we have the people who are like the quote unquote super users who are the most technically proficient. Um, but you know, to me, if we really want to have inclusive design, we really want to see what who who’s not at the table. Let’s maybe have people of different ages, different technical proficiency, different, you know, socioeconomic, different uh parts on the company hierarchy because if this system is really designed for everybody, we need to get as many different thoughts, ideas, perspectives involved, um, to me, uh, often times if we overlook that, um, it, it, it ends up being a gap that we have to fix later. Um, you, uh, you also cite, um, this being valuable for uh professional growth. How is that? Yeah, and this is something, uh, as I get older, Tony, I’ve been reflecting on on a lot and uh I’ve been, um, I’ve I’ve felt this in my professional career and I’ve I’ve had the um privilege to uh teach as an adjunct professor close by here at University of Maryland Baltimore County. And it’s something I often tell my students, it’s like, um, you know, if, if you really want to be good consultants in this space, um. You know, we, we often times focus on the, the, the credentials or the certifications and you know we go crazy with the certifications and, and you know so we can present that and say, ah this is, you know, this is who we are but in my experience what’s been most useful and also has been useful to to the success of our projects is really being an expert in the industry that you’re working with, being passionate about the industries that you’re working in. Um, so for for us we tend to have a focus on the social justice sector, um, and it’s, you know, in my tradition, in my blood, and my, in my, uh, upbringing to be working with these types of organizations and really understanding the ins and outs of, of these organizations, and I feel like that’s been able to, um, uh, it’s it’s been something I’ve been uh able to bring to my projects, bring to my implementations, um, and the love and care that we give our clients and. It’s, it’s been very helpful so it’s something I, I encourage folks to, um, you know, to, to work on becoming experts work on becoming um keeping up to date with what’s going on in the industry so if you’re a nonprofit technology consultant being fully aware with the challenges with grant making or you know how government funding might be affected these days or you know taking an opinion on how AI can help or harm uh nonprofits. Uh, taking an opinion on data privacy and where it fits, so, uh, what I’ve seen is that what our clients need is not just, just people who are experts at the technology, but experts at the industry that they’re working in. And what about professional growth for for folks in nonprofits as they’re looking at their own businesses? I mean this is sort of a broadening exercise where folks are learning. there as you’re you’re suggesting for consultants, the folks nonprofits learning outside their own areas of expertise. Yes, yes, absolutely, um, an example of that is, you know, uh, to me I realize that, you know, equity and and technology is, is, is ultimately, you know, uh, it’s super important for inclusive design and inclusive systems, um, so for me that meant, um, I was gonna become a. A certified DEI practitioner, um, so I went and, you know, went through the classes, got my certification, and, and that was something that I, I wanted to make sure that was part of who, who I was. So while you might think that this might not be part of your part of your, um, technical credential, um, this might not be part of your technical credential, um, it, it having that business credential or having that expertise was super important, um. Another example could be change management. Um, so if, if you feel that change management, excuse me, change management is something that you’re passionate about, by all means become a certified credential change management professional because it’s only going to make all your projects, uh, more successful. Get you outside your comfort zone. Yeah, I mean I think there’s I think there’s value in that. I’ve I’ve seen it professionally, um. Just, you know, challenging, challenging yourself, you know, outside outside your normal boundaries and and and it really applies to any industry, so as I tell my students, if you’re a The technology is everywhere, so you know if you wanna do fashion tech, become an expert in the fashion side of it a sports tech, become an expert in the sports side of it doesn’t really matter, um, but it’s really just about, you know, what my clients over 27 years of of of this work, um, they don’t really care how many salesforce certifications I have. They don’t really care about, you know, what they, what they care about is do I understand them? Do I understand their business, do I, you know, what, what else do I bring to the table? There’s lots of tech consultants out there, but what else do you bring to the table? So it sounds like we’re in your backyard, uh NTC. You teach at University of Maryland Baltimore County. Yes, yes, yes, just uh uh right right outside 20 minutes from here, so it’s nice, we’ll see you again next year. I don’t do you know where next year’s is? I believe Detroit, but, uh, wherever it’s gonna be, I’ll be there. We’ll be together. Um, what else, what else are you gonna share on this topic that, uh, you and I haven’t talked about yet? Um, we are gonna, I think the one other thing, and, um, it’s not something I talked about, you know, a few years ago, but it’s just so much more relevant now is, um, you know, again as far as the, the human factors that that uh affect CRM, it’s also uh looking at um, you know, how bias and discrimination can make their way into the systems, um, so whether it is algorithms that are built, whether it’s AI models, um, and, uh, making sure that we have. Checks and balances in place to ensure that the data is um not toxic in any ways or or the data is not skewing results in a in a way that could um hurt or harm communities. I think one example I if I can give a specific is, you know, if you are a nonprofit that uses an algorithm for recruitment volunteer recruitment or application reviews, um, you know, making sure that those do not, uh, uh, create skewed results, making sure that. There’s a checks and balances process to make sure that that that the results are not discriminatory, that they’re fair, they’re unbiased, um, and that’s something that, um, organizations are really grappling with how do we do that? So I have some, some models that I’m gonna be sharing as well today that I’m pretty excited about on on how you can create some checks and balances. Yeah, um, I mean it’s uh I wish I wish I had my diagram I could bring up here too. Yeah, but um, yeah, yeah, um, but it’s basically just um being intentional about, OK, you know, if again starting with strategy, so let’s say it’s a volunteer recruitment plan and you say, you know, I and I had a lot of this well we want to increase our, our diversity in our recruit in our volunteer pool so you know it’s, it’s basically setting some measures for that. um, we wanna have 20% of, of this particular demographic or 40% of this and then it’s really just um creating some checks and balances just like in any. Um, in any implementation of of technology there’s gonna be a, a testing phase, there’s gonna be a data validation phase. So what what I’m proposing is we also have a a a a a bias detection phase. We also have a, um, you know, um, uh, a sort of um discrimination and bias, uh, check that we essentially do so in that case we will just like we have parameters to say these are the percentages we’re looking for, what are the results for it? So, um, so it’s, it’s not rocket science, but, but it’s really just making sure that when we build our test plans out that we’re also checking for bias and discrimination. I know a lot of work on LinkedIn. Have you written a book? Um, in the works, Tony, in the works you mentioned it or maybe I’m just that you ought to write a book. OK, uh, you’re working on a book, um, early stages, yes. But um but yeah, now there’s I’ve I’ve kind of captured a lot of thoughts um over the years about this and you know these are things that were just kind of things I uh thought about, you know, like uh you know this doesn’t feel right or this could be done in a more equitable way or this is this is not really doing good. Even though we’re calling it tech for good, um, and then, you know, being in communities like this at N10 and NTC, uh, made me realize, oh, I’m not the only one who thinks like this. There’s others who who are who have also found some weird stuff in out there in the implementation world and and I think, um, you know, as a consultant who, who now has started my own practice, um, I realized, you know, I don’t have to just continue being part of the problem, you know, I can. Uh, I can try to shift some things and, and, um, share my stories to, to make sure that we, we, we, we collectively do better. OK, now, you know, I imagine you’re, you’re part of a minority faith community in the United States. How does that inform your practice or or how does it open your eyes to the inequities that that we were you know, you’re doing more to fight than I am. I bring voice to them, but you’re actually doing. Well, well bringing to it is is very important, so I appreciate that you do that, Tony. Um, uh, yes, as part of the sick tradition I think um it’s it’s a few things. um, I mean it really does fuel a lot of my work, um, you know, the sick tradition is a very um deep in in community service and in justice and in collective liberation, so it it really is a fuel for, you know, the, the, the focus on the social justice sector. Um, but I would say, yeah, absolutely, you know, being a visible minority does, uh, help me have, uh, that the radar is always on. Um, you know, and, um, I, I’m, I’m very aware, hyper aware of of things that just don’t feel right or that that that that don’t sit well with me, whether it’s happening to me or someone else, um, so you know, early on in my career I was, you know, thinking to myself, ah, you know, I’m just learning the ropes, let me just follow along what everybody else is doing and you know, different practices that might happen in in implementations themselves and technology implementations. I’ll just go along with it. It’s fine, um, but now I, I didn’t it right, yeah, so now I kind of sense that, you know, I feel that agency that I can, you know, I can, I can speak my mind, I can step forward and say, yeah, you know, this, this persona building exercise we’re doing for marketing, you know, of, you know, guessing what. Different races and demographics might feel about our work. Yeah, it doesn’t, that’s not great. That’s there’s other ways to to get that information that doesn’t sit here and, and, you know, enable stereotypes, uh, you know, we can use archetypes, we can, you know, we can ask people directly why they could come to our nonprofit or don’t come. So there’s there’s alternatives out there, you know, the tried and true methods are not always the best, um, they’re not always the most equitable, so you know, let’s let’s brainstorm other alternatives. Did finding that agency come from starting your own business or before then? I think it was a combination of being in circles of other technologists of color that, you know, where I, I felt very empowered and said, ah, you know, we’re not the only ones, you know, like other people feel this way and collectively. You know, there’s things we can do better, um, and then yes, starting the company and I I recognize that comes with privilege, um, and not everybody can speak out the way that they want to, but, but definitely starting starting my own practice and being very transparent with my customers about, hey, this is who we are, this is what we’re about. If we see something that doesn’t feel right or that the data that you’re requesting from your clients is is overreaching, we’re gonna, we’re gonna raise our hand and and you know what I thought might have deterred. Customers is actually um uh had customers gravitate towards us. They want to be held accountable. Yeah, yeah. Well, I’m glad you found your voice it’s always good to see you, thank you very much. Thanks so much. My pleasure. Singer and CEO. Thank you for joining us for our. 2025 nonprofit technology conference coverage in the Baltimore Convention Center and thanks to Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits for sponsoring nonprofit radio at 25 NTC. Next week, more from 25 NTC PII in the age of AI. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. I’m gonna miss that alliteration. Donor box is going away this week. Fast, flexible, friendly, fundraising forms. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for March 24, 2025: Join Us At #25NTC & Great Value In Sustainable Giving

Amy Sample WardJoin Us At #25NTC

The 2025 Nonprofit Technology Conference is next month in Baltimore. Nonprofit Radio will be there. You still have time to join in-person or virtual. NTEN CEO, and our technology contributor, Amy Sample Ward, reveals all the learning and fun you can expect.

 

Dave Raley: Great Value In Sustainable Giving

Dave Raley is the author of the book, “The Rise of Sustainable Giving.” Our subscription economy has spawned a change in donor preferences and great growth in recurring donations. Dave shares his expertise on incentives; creating a thriving sustainer program; naming; converting donors to sustainers; what the future looks like; and more. He’s the founder of Imago Consulting.

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Notice. I expertly wished you happy Saint Patrick’s Day last week when it was Saint Patrick’s Day, so prompt, so timely, right there, so no need to apologize this week for wishing you happy Saint Patrick’s Day week, a week late. We’re right on time here on nonprofit Radio. And I’m glad you’re with us. I’d get slapped with a diagnosis of cataphagia. If I had to repeat the words, you missed this week’s show. Pretty sad when the, the bar is just set at. Being on time with a happiness wish. That’s, that’s, that’s a sad state. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, to introduce this week’s show. Hey Tony, this week it’s join us at 25 NTC. The 2025 nonprofit technology conference is next month in Baltimore. Non-profit radio will be there. You still have time to join in person or virtual. N10 CEO and our technology contributor, Amy Stammple Ward reveals all the learning and fun you can expect. Then Great value in sustainable giving. Dave Raley is the author of the book The Rise of Sustainable Giving. Our subscription economy has spawned a change in donor preferences and great growth in recurring donations. Dave shares his expertise on incentives, creating a thriving sustainer program, naming, converting donors to sustainers, what the future looks like, and more. He’s the founder of Imago Consulting. On Tony’s take 2. Tales from the gym. If they can do it, we all can. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. Here is. Join us at 25 NTC. I’m ready to record with Amy Sample Ward. They are the CEO of N10. Uh, they’re also, of course, our nonprofit radio technology contributor, but today it’s the CEO of N10 role that we are here to talk about because we’re talking about 25 NTC, the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference. It is coming up April 16, 1718 in Baltimore, Maryland. Let’s talk 25. Amy, can’t wait to hugs, hugs. Uh, and, you know, I, I know that most of your time at the NTC you’re recording for nonprofit radio, but what’s nice about it is you’re not in like a recording studio. And so I can always walk by and just listen to who. You’re talking to and um I always see other people standing there listening, um, or taking photos, you know. Yeah, I love, I love the visibility. Yes, we’re, we’re gonna be, we’re in the hub in the commons, which is where all the meals are, all the all the uh keynote sessions, all the general sessions are right there, everything. What else? What else? The receptions, receptions, yes. Uh, so I, I feel like, you know, we’re just, by the time this is airing, we’re just gonna be 3 weeks out. So we probably should focus on the online. Version of uh you know, people register for the in-person conference. Even in person, like they will walk up on day 10, you get walk-ups every year. Oh, all right. Well, all right, so then let’s keep that open. All right, yeah, you you can still register to join us in Baltimore. Of course there is an online only virtual side of the conference that you can also register for and never leave your home or your office or wherever you are. That’s right. There’s, there’s a version for uh each in person and online, and if you need to switch, you can go, this is all on the website, there’s a little spot for switching from virtual to in-person and vice versa. And if you register for in person and end up not coming or you came and you felt like there was too many sessions to choose from, or you could only come for 1.5 days of the, of the 3, you have access to all of the online content, just like somebody who registered for only online. It’s all So if you register for Baltimore, you’re basically registering for both, essentially, because you can access all content. Right, for next, for the following 3 months, I think you can get access to all the, all the, uh, virtual sessions because there are a number of virtual only sessions, but as, as you just said, OK, you get access to both really if you, if you, OK, so all right, so let’s keep up the possibility then. so, you know, where should we show up if we’re, uh, if we’re walking in. Uh, of course, all the info is at.org naturally. But you know, just where, where are we in Baltimore? Where are we going? We’re at the Baltimore Convention Center right by the harbor, and I don’t believe that there’s another event happening in the convention center, um, but at least the area we’re in is very clearly just us. You can walk right through the sky bridge from the Hilton or walk from the Sheraton. They’re connected to the building, um, and Of course, as always, there are lots of other activities that happen that aren’t in the convention center, but all the sessions, all of the main conference stuff will all be in the convention center and We’re trying something that we’ve never done before, um, but because of the physical proximity to the stadium, we, with thanks to the financial support of three of our sponsors, have bought out two sections in the stadium for attendees that want to, to all go over to the Baltimore Orioles game together, uh, Wednesday evening. So, like, knock on wood for Memorable weather, whatever. I don’t want to just say good because it seems like it’d be good, you know, jinx, but um and this is free. This is free. Yeah, you got sponsors covering hundreds of tickets for, yeah, yeah, that’s outstanding. Baltimore Orioles game. OK, that’s that’s the football team. Noball. Oh they play baseball? All right. Well, baseball, no, that’s good. Baball is good. That’s right. That’s right. OK. um. Oh, I thought you were joking, but you were being serious. No, I was joking. OK, OK, good. OK, good. I was like, oh gosh. Yeah, so it’ll it’ll be fun and I think that. Somebody from our group, I mean, it doesn’t need to be me. So maybe, maybe we can convince the sponsors to do it. Even goes down on the field and says, Hey, everybody from the conference is here, and we all get to wave. So cool. I thought you were gonna say you’re gonna sing the anthem. Oh my gosh, no, they would pay me not to do it. All right. Um, so let’s remind folks that NTC. The nonprofit technology conference is not only for technologists. We, we say this year after year, but we have new listeners each year and maybe somebody didn’t listen to last year’s NTC TS TS show. Let let’s make this very, very clear. It’s not only for technologists. Well, it’s, it’s such a complicated thing because on one hand, I would say it’s 2025. We are all using technology to do our job. And so in some ways, we’re all technologists, but This is not a conference that was founded 25 years ago or still today operated with the assumption that everyone that is making decisions about technology or using technology or wants to know, like the latest developments of technology, see themselves as The IT director or or has technology in their job title, right? And so the topics, I mean, there’s, I think 162 with the latest count or whatever in the spreadsheet, you know, of of sessions, but there’s so many opportunities in sessions and out to talk about all the other implications beyond any technology system, you know, it’s not necessarily. Just about which CRM which database are you using? It’s why, why do you even have that data in your database? Where did it come from? Do you know when you could get rid of it? Do you have a retention policy? You know, it’s all these other pieces that impact, yes, our technology systems but also impact our work and how we can do that work and technology is just in in the mix of it all. There are multiple tracks that that are not that involve technology naturally that overlap but fundraising, there’s a fundraising track, there’s a diversity, equity accessibility track, um, there’s a leadership track, you know, there’s, so there’s lots of different subjects across these 160 some uh sessions, and some of them will be. Uh, I’ll be talking to the speakers from some of them, a subset of them, for future episodes of nonprofit radio. Of course, that’s what I’ll, will be on the hub, uh, will be in the hub at the Commons recording. Um. I love the, you know, if you do go, if you go in person, I had to, you know, I’m looking at the lunch, it’s incredible. We had to, I think we talk about the food every year, but I got, I got, I’m reading now. I’m reading from the lunch description for each of the three days, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. All meals at the NTC. Include a range of options for gluten free, vegan, vegetarian, low carb, low salt and low sugar dietary needs. Menus avoid or label the inclusion of peanuts, tree nuts, shellfish, eggs, cow’s milk, soybeans, sesame and wheat. Halal, kosher and celiac meals are available on request, and if you need a space away from the cacophony, look for signs for the quiet tables. It’s such a thoughtful damn conference. I mean, this is just around the food, but that’s a microcosm of the thoughtfulness around NTC. Well this is a quite a core value of, of NTC and N10. Tell us how you, you think about what people need. At a conference and and how you execute on that. Well, maybe I could start with the food that feels um especially relevant, what you don’t know, or externally doesn’t know. Um, we have, um, I will say an animal rights activist organization, uh, that you can anticipate who they are in the community, glad they’re in the community, glad they come to the conference, learn from sessions, you know, presented sessions, etc. Who Has, um, for a number of years, tried a few different campaign strategies to have the conference be entirely vegan. I am vegan. I have been since I was still a teenager, you know, I I don’t disagree necessarily, but as an insight, and I’m glad that there are conferences that are able to be all vegan, but our community has Members in it who have allergies that make uh all vegan, you know, diet at a conference where it’s just all set out on the table, not something they could eat at. Um, and we have folks with disabilities who, even if they don’t have an allergy, they have food related needs that allow them to be comfortable and manage their day without having to go back to their hotel room, right, to eat, um. There are a lot of different things that come across someone’s decision making mind when they’re standing at the beginning of that like buffet table, right? And some of them are dietary, medical, health related, some of them are emotional, some of them are social, right? Like, what if you don’t recognize any food on that table? None of this food is from a, a shared culture that you have. We have people from 16 different countries coming to the conference, right? You might not be allergic to any of them, but if you don’t know what any of them are, and you’re trying to have professional conversations and you’re really trying to get along with this person that you just met in a session, right? And maybe you wanna work for them, and now you’re faced with a bunch of food that you don’t know what it is. That’s very difficult, right? And so we think about Accessibility in a lot of different ways at the conference, and what are the pieces that we can put in place that make it so people are comfortable, they have some things that they can recognize and anticipate throughout the day. It’s why we have coffee and tea at all different hours because Again, culturally or from the time zone that you’re in, right? You, this might be when you want coffee. Uh, so we really wanna think about how do folks move through this space without having To use up all of their decision making or all of their thinking for the day on where do I need to go? Is there gonna be food there? Can I get more water? What do I need to do? Like, we want all of that to be in place so that people are using up their brains saying, wow, what should I think about AI? Oh, wow, what should I learn about this new data standard? What, right? We want that to be where people can spend their thinking and not on Am I gonna be able to eat here, you know? It’s all very thoughtfully done. You, you, you, you call it accessibility and ease, uh, and I, I just caption it as thoughtful, thoughtful. A lot of thought goes into, uh, hosting over 2000 people, right? How many, how many do you think we’ll have. Well, I mean, unfortunately, we have in person, yeah, I mean, unfortunately, it’s so similar to 2020 in which, um, that was the year that it was meant to be in Baltimore previously. Um and with the start, uh, it was scheduled for March 23rd through 25th, 2020. So that was right when We were the first event that was canceled with the governor’s, you know, declaration that events are. I remember, I remember tearful. Yeah, because we made the choice to cancel before the governor, before any governor had stopped events, and so we had to make the choice to cancel, knowing that it would mean we’d close the organization because we’d have to pay all the fines. And thankfully, our lawyer found that the cancellation to the convention center, uh, has to be in writing, and we, we never bothered to tell them we weren’t coming because that felt self-evident, and we had spent a week telling the community and the governor said, hey, there’s no events, and we’re like, what we’re, we don’t have to pay. I mean we still have to pay some, but We didn’t have to close as an organization, right, and pay every dollar we had, um, but now with all of these just erratic and harmful changes that the administration is unleashing basically every day. We’re having, you know, we’re hearing from folks asking for a scholarship. They just lost 75% of their funding because of what’s happened, you know, they still want to come to the conference. They, they know that that’s where they can connect with people and get resources and, and learn. But they are firing staff, they, they have no funds. So we’re giving scholarships out to, you know, anybody who’s writing to us um in those situations, and we have continued the regular rate for anyone within about 100 miles of Baltimore that is maybe, you know, a a a local in that way to try and keep um it accessible. To folks who are really having those impacts. Um, so we’ve seen a lot of, not a lot, but a number of folks in February need to move to virtual because they Their organization no longer has funding, you know, um, which is Difficult and just outrageous that we’re in this place where organizations, you know, are somehow the target of I don’t know. I, I, I don’t even know how to frame what the situation is. Yeah, we talked about that. Yeah, so that is gonna impact how many folks are there. I mean, I’m sure they’ll still be, um, you know, 2000. Regis registrants, it’s just by the time we get to April, what will be the mix of a couple 100 online, you know, people in person, who, who, who can still physically come, you know? Um, and unfortunately, we’re having folks from a few of the non-US countries say, hey, I’ve been advised not to come to the US. So I’m not going to travel there anymore, and I’ll just be a virtual attendee. Which is also infuriating because this is a global community and I Don’t like that we would have, I mean, we’re just talking about accessibility, right? And, and that all the elements that we try to control so that we can create a, a place where folks really can be together and share their ideas and build power and, and make relationships that are beyond any of these, you know, oh, you work in a different organization. Who cares? We can still share our ideas. We can still figure this out together, right? And To have folks Feel unsafe is is. Not what we want, you know, and obviously not in our control, not in our, not our doing, but it still on a bigger scale to have folks feel unsafe entering the United States. Right. It infuriating. All right, let’s not end on an infuriating note, although, uh the the realism is uh realism and not ignoring. I feel like, I feel like too many. Too many of our community’s content creators are ignoring the reality that it’s besieging us every single day. Yeah, it is every day. I, I, so, you know, reality is essential. I, we’re living it. So, well, that’s a great pivot. We could end on something uh positive, which is the three keynotes that are coming because Alyssa Richardson. Her work is just on what you’re talking about. How do communities use the technology they have access to social media, etc. to shine a light on what is really happening in their community, to have some access to power through truth and information. Um, she has written books, she’s a professor, she has a, you know, whole lab, um, at UCLA or USC, um, and it’s just really An incredible person, so she’s One of the keynotes, just as you were just saying, why are we not talking about this, um, and Doctor Ashley Xu, who is the author of Against Techno Abelism and you know, kind of trying to counter this idea that technology is here to cure us and make us perfect because we don’t need to, you know, what what if we get rid of disabilities, which is such a Elitist ablest idea like this disabilities are in so many people in so many different ways, and that’s not that something’s wrong with them, you know, um, technology isn’t some cure or solution or path to perfection, right? That’s no, no, no, that’s so antithetical to, to what, at least in the community we’re talking about with technology. So I’m excited for her talk, um. But we also have Michael Running Wolf, who’s worked on indigenous language projects through AI. So yes, it’s probably unavoidable to talk about AI, but can we talk about it rooted in absolutely using it in ways that help us as the users, as communities who didn’t get to necessarily have access. To build open AI or anything else, right? So what, what do we, what, what can we learn um from Michael’s projects really rooting those technologies in um communities most impacted. All right, 3 outstanding. Keynote speakers, you’ll enjoy one each morning. Right after the breakfast. Yeah, or you can even, you know, if you’re a slow eater like me, save your breakfast and eat it while they’re talking, yeah, and savor your breakfast because it’s all in the same place. It’s all ins and of course the virtual attendees are are part of that part of the the keynotes as well, and they’ll be having breakfast, you know, on their own, just your camera will be off while you’re eating your Cheerios. Yeah, exactly. All right. Uh, so April 16 to 18, uh, Baltimore Convention Center, all the info is at n10.org. It’s right up the top of the website. You can’t possibly miss it. Join us in person, come see, come see nonprofit Radio at the Commons in the hub. We’ll have our studio set up or join uh 25 NTC virtually, but join. It’s, it’s worth it. It’s, it’s, it’s a smart savvy conference. That’s why this is the. 11th NTC that I’m bringing nonprofit radio to because the speakers are savvy and smart and they benefit all of us and as Amy, as Amy said, we all work with technology in our jobs and so the nonprofit technology conference is for you. Be with us. Thank you, Amy. Yeah, see you there. I’ll see you in a couple of weeks. Sounds great. All right, bye. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s DonorBox, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you, a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges. Helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs. Helping you, help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now it’s time for. Great value in sustainable giving. It’s a pleasure to welcome Dave Raley to nonprofit Radio. He’s the founder of Imago Consulting, an advisory firm that helps organizations create growth through innovation. He’s the author of the book The Rise of Sustainable Giving How the Subscription Economy Is Transforming Recurring Giving and what nonprofits can do to benefit. That’s what brings him to the show. You’ll find the book at sustainablegiving.org. You’ll find Dave Raley on LinkedIn. Dave, welcome to nonprofit Radio. So good to be here, Tony, and good to actually be, as we were saying offline on the other side of the mic. I’ve appreciated listening to the show and glad to be on it. Thank you very much. Thanks for being a listener. Congratulations on the brand new book. Oh, thank you, thank you, it’s been uh. Quite the journey, 3 years, um, 438 hours of writing enumerate the stats in the book. I, I have a friend who, um, because I I I’ve worked a lot with uh charities through the sort of the marketing agency space, Tony, and so I had a friend comment like, Dave, you don’t need to track your time. You do know that, right? And I thought, I don’t know, I just like tracking things, so I don’t want to track my steps every day, but I will track the number of hours I poured into this. This, uh, this, uh, passion project for sure. So as you were writing over those 4, you were you were keeping a log. I was keeping a log and thinking I don’t know if this thing’s ever going to. To be done candidly, I think the 1st 3 years, probably the 1st 2 years were like, OK, 1 ft in front of the other, and, uh, such a, such a huge effort, um, but I’m really proud of the book, uh, the early reception, and just I’m really hopeful that it makes a significant difference in our sector. It has that potential, absolutely. Um, if I may, I’d like to read from, uh, the foreword to, to sort of frame us a little bit, uh, your, your forward is by Gabe Cooper, CEO of Virtuous who’s been a guest on uh nonprofit radio also. The reality is that nonprofits are fundraising in a world that no longer exists. The total number of donors giving to nonprofits has consistently decreased over the past decade. Donors are more distracted than ever, and they receive a constant stream of ads and personalized messages from their favorite brands. Most donors still desire to make an impact in the world, but it’s become infinitely harder for nonprofits to break through the noise. That’s, uh, that’s as far as I got on the book. That’s page uh XXII. I stopped. I didn’t even to the pages. That was great. I didn’t even get into the Arabic numbers, so I, I stopped at XXII. Um, now, so. Uh, it’s getting hard to get through the noise. We’re, we’re fundraising in old methods. That was a little frame up. Why don’t you please give us, uh, your take on, on Gabe’s wisdom there. Yeah, you know, I, one of the meta sort of topics that I’m really passionate about is what does sustainable innovation look like? Uh, the book is certainly about sustainable giving and recurring giving in light of how, um, shifts have changed, and we’ll talk about that shortly, but You know, to respond to the way Gabe positioned that, number one, we are absolutely in the middle of a generosity crisis, um, and, uh, that is in North America, that the number of Americans that are giving to charity today is less than, uh, last year and is less than the year prior. Now, as those of us in this industry know, often the amount of dollars that are being given to to philanthropy, um, by individuals is increasing, but that’s thanks to largely mega, uh, you know, billionaire donors, which go for it. I would love them taking their, their philanthropic giving as well, but I do think there’s something about how do we teach the next generation generosity and what does that look like? Um, but to Gabe’s point about models, um, one of the things I always, uh, say is that it’s really important not to confuse your organization’s mission with your model. So your mission is about what your organization, your cause is, uh, is trying to change in the world. Your model is how you do that, right? Including how do you fund doing that. And so when I think about sustainable innovation, I think every organization, every institution, Is really somewhere on that organizational life cycle curve, you know, that S curve you see in like business books, you know, where it’s like infancy, early growth, mid-growth, slowing plateauing and decline, right? Every organization goes through that, and that’s just kind of a like the, you know, fourth law of thermodynamics for organizational health is that those models do age out. And so for me, um, the reason innovation is so important is because it helps us create new S curves, new models to effectively accomplish the mission that our organizations are called to, so. Innovation is critical, uh, models do shift over time, and one of the models that I’ve seen shift, uh, tremendously over the last decade is what’s been happening in the space of recurring giving, namely for the charities that have historically been left behind, uh, Tony, 3 quarters of charities, um. have historically not been able to really tap into strong, growing, resilient giving, you know, they’re not the local public television or public radio station or museum or, um, you know, 1 to 1 sponsorship type of organization. They’ve done pretty well over the last 100 years, uh, with Rick Gibbing, but it’s really the, the food bank, the rescue mission, the relief and development agency. The, uh, the think tank that hasn’t been able to really build strong growing resilient, recurring giving until really the subscription economy and the rises of subscription economy has essentially led to changes in how we consume. You know, the average American today, Tony, has, uh, more than 12 subscriptions, maybe to their chagrin, right, I know 96% of us I think have more than one. And yeah, I was 9. 9.8%. I have at least one subscription, adults, um, and what’s the number you just cited a number of subscriptions. Oh my gosh. All right. Um, before we get into the sustainable, let’s let’s define the subscription. I mean, Yeah, no, the Amazon Prime and Netflix are ubiquitous, but let’s just, let’s just make sure we’re all starting at the same place. What, what’s your sense of the subscription economy? Yeah, and you know, you, you hit it on the head. I think everyone kind of intuitively knows what it is today. Um, 10 years ago when I first started talking about this in the industry, Tony, I had to explain that, you know, what do you mean? You know, subscription. I was like, well, have you heard of Netflix? Oh yeah, OK, I get it. But today it’s really the rise of recurring ongoing, um, transactions in every area of our life, in our business lives, you know, we’re on Zoom right now. I don’t know about you, but I have to pay for the Zoom subscription. Um, you know, I listened to Spotify this morning while I was writing my latest wave report, the weekly column that I write on innovation, that’s a subscription. I had to change the batteries, by the way, in my Arlo camera, um, uh, some people use Ring. Uh, these, these doorbell cameras. Yes, right, you have a subscription, yeah, you make a point. You have a subscription to your doorbellion to your door. If you would have told me 10 years ago that you’re going to be subscribed to the doorbell company, I would have said, uh, no thanks, that’s not great. And yet I gladly spend, you know, whatever $15 a month to know when an Amazon package gets dropped off. One that that strikes me is that we used to pay. One time you used to buy a subcri you used to buy the product Windows. Windows you used to buy the, the operating system and every couple of years there was a new operating system and you have to spend $200 or $300 to, uh, now and, and other things similar but you now have a subscription to Windows 365. It’s called 365 and, and that’s the way you now access the Windows operating system. I don’t know, just, I don’t know, 78 years ago it wasn’t that way. Yeah, well, and I don’t know about you, but or your listeners, but I went uh kicking and screaming, you know, you’re like, no, I wanna own my software. I wanna own my music. Until you start to realize, oh yeah, how long did it take me to go from Windows, whatever, 95 to it was XP first and then 95. It’s like you would, you would end up with this like grossly out of date software because you’re too, I don’t know they meet you, but I was too cheap to, you know, get the next set of software to the point where it is so that ongoing value proposition, which by the way, is a key lesson for fundraising. Your proposition, yeah, but you have to, you have to like the reason I I give money to Spotify every month is not because I’m renting music from the music company. It’s because there is an ongoing each month I’m receiving novel value, and that is what’s uh helping me continue to stay in that subscription. And so I think software, I now look at it as a gift, right? I started uh started my company. And Mago just uh just under 3 years ago and I was so grateful that I have to spend several $1000 in, you know, in software costs. I knew I could I could subscribe to Adobe Creative Cloud, to Google Workspace, to Zoom, and get a lot of value and spread out that cost, um, but that their ongoing value is so powerful. Share some of the uh stats that you have about sustainable giving, why this is so important for nonprofits. Yeah, there’s, you know, there’s certainly some of the, um, the commonly used stats about the value of sustainable giving, which just to rattle through a few of those, average retention rates, 78 to 86%, that’s versus a multi-year, you know, single gift owner we call them. That typically they’ll retain about 42%, so, you know, almost double or in some cases literally double the the uh the the retention rate, significantly high, higher long term value, 5 to 7 times the long-term value. They’re 6 times more likely to leave an organization in their estate, um, or legacy plan, uh, if they’re a recurring donor. I was just doing a seminar with a Group that does uh recurring or I’m sorry, does legacy giving, Tony, and they, um they just did a study of all of the organizations and all these state gifts they’ve monitored and the number one most predictable factor, um, after an after a donor had been on the file for 10 years, so. The first one was longevity, but the second was frequency. It was the frequency of giving and so recurring givers were the most likely um indicator that they would be a legacy giver. That’s outstanding. What can you shout the company name? Yeah, Canopy Resources, um, for Ministry. They’ve got two different brands. Oh sorry, no, C A N O. OK, OK, but don’t spell it right, the incredible value. And but there are some less known statistics. Neon, the folks over at Neon looked at over 200. They found the average charity from 2019 to 2024 grew recurring 127%. So this is not, um, you know, I’m a big believer in seeing, you know, what changes on the horizon and what waves, you know, are coming. This is, this is an opportunity that’s not something that’s just coming down the line. I’m not here saying, hey, I wrote a book, Tony, in 2 or 3 years, this is going to be a big deal. It’s like, no, no, no, it’s a big deal right now, and it’s been a big deal the last couple of years. But, and this is critical, my, I feel like part of my role in this sector is to help people to connect the dots that it’s a big deal now, but then what do I do about it? And so really the, the third part of the book is ultimately, well, the 2nd and 3 parts of the book are how to take advantage of the subscription economy and then how to build and grow a thriving recurring giving program. Also recurring donors, uh, you make this point, give 25% more than their, their recurring donation commitment. Just, just flush it out a little bit quickly. Yeah, the, you know, and, and I, I’ve had some, as I’ve been speaking about this at conferences, I have had occasional people come up to me and say, yeah, set it and forget it, right? And I’m like, no, that actually it turns out in the subscription world that doesn’t work either. But really your recurring donors are the most generous single gift donors, meaning the average recurring donor um on a file will give in addition to their annual recurring giving another about 25% in single, what we call single gifts, right? So it’s the year-end gift, it’s the emergency relief gift. And so when I work with organizations to map out their cultivation of recurring donors, I’m we’re always looking at what are you doing to give your recurring donors additional gift opportunities, um, how are you messaging that to them because just as much as some organizations might think, well, you know, we should just uh not send any uh additional asks to our recurring donors. No, the opportunity is really to. To cultivate them because they are, they’re the most bought into your cause. So when there is that disaster or that uh crisis situation or that year end, again, those major times of year, those donors are often the most responsive. So what we’re seeing is that That this uh subscription economy that’s ubiquitous as you described. Has led to a change in donor preferences on the charitable side so sort of the, the corporate side has taken this and accelerated it and, and it’s like we said now ubiquitous. People are expecting this on the and, and looking for it even on the, on the charitable side. So it, so it’s a, it’s a shifting donor preferences, would you talk about that in the book. Yeah, and it’s really about um a lot of these trends, um, start on the what I would call the consumer side, right, which is just it’s it’s it’s setting tones. I remember I I started in the industry in the early days of digital fundraising and um I remember when people were were worried about putting their. Credit card in online and I remember when Facebook came out and clients would say, hey, should we do fundraising on Facebook and I would say, no, it’s a good, it’s a good relational platform, you know, it’s a good way to connect with your alumni or whatever, um, because it wasn’t intel several years of in this case Facebook being around and people becoming used to basically their consumer lives and their social media lives intersecting. That’s when then. You know, in this case, I think it was the Haiti earthquake that was the real uh linchpin moment, um, in the late 2000s when Facebook and the Red Cross raised, I think it was $30 million overnight and it just, that changed the landscape. Of people being willing to give related to their social media presence. Well, if it weren’t for several years prior to that of people getting used to using their credit card online and all these other things, it wouldn’t have paved the way for generosity. And so I’m seeing the same thing, the subscription economy is not new. I don’t have to convince people that it exists when I speak now, but I do have to help them understand how that has really laid the groundwork for people’s philanthropic behavior changing. You call in the book subscription philanthropy. Yeah, I don’t know, I don’t know if that’s your phrase. I had I had I’m crediting well, and the funny thing is, you know, and I don’t want people and I talk about subscription giving too. I want to be careful on the reason I didn’t use that in the title of the book, by the way, was I don’t want people to think I’m trying to, we’re trying to make philanthropy and generosity a consumeristic act. Now there is a value proposition and there’s a value exchange, and sometimes, by the way, there’s goods and services that even exchange hands. If I watch your public, you know, television station or I visit. The museum or I get the, you know, the free book resource, there could actually be some form of sort of good or service that exchanged, but what I’m trying to point out with subscription philanthropy is that really, um, there are some lessons we can learn from those subscription worlds and we can apply them to today. I remember when the streamlined purchasing uh um pages, I’m thinking of, you know, Amazon, one click buy, when, when those were emerging, they were influencing. Well, they were influencing what donors expected from an online transaction, and that influenced what nonprofits had to. Had to create that we had to make a, you know, more seamless online not a purchase but an online giving process because people expected that from the, from their commercial side. So this is, you know, it, and I think that’s terrific. I think there are lessons that can be translated, they learned from the commercial side to the charitable side, uh, that’s, that’s all to our benefit on the, on the charitable side. Totally agree, totally agree. So let’s talk about, you know, now we have to, you know, I always remind listeners, you know, you got to get the book because there’s only so much we can talk about in an hour. So you got to get the book at um at sustainablegiving.org. Of course, we all, uh, you can also get it through Barnes and Noble and Amazon, etc. um, but you know, give Dave’s landing page some hits because uh. He’s a metrics guy he’s tracking the metrics on the. You’ll you’ll end up with a copy of the book either way, but you may as well make, uh, make the gateway through, uh, sustainablegiving.org. So. Uh, we’re, we’re jumping a little ahead, but I, I do want to talk about some of the incentives. So now, you know, we’ve talked about sustainable philanthropy, how important sustainable giving is, how that’s created a subscription philanthropy, so that’s what I meant, subscription philanthropy model, um, some of the incentives if you wanna, if we wanna move into this. We, we, we don’t feel like we’re doing it well enough, the, uh, the way the Gabe Cooper quote, you know, suggests that we either not doing it, which is really unwise, um, well, you know what, let’s take a step back. Let’s go to, let’s go to the nonprofit that isn’t doing. Uh, isn’t doing sustain or giving. And we’ve already explained why, why it’s important. We’re not, we’re, we’re past the, the motivation step, but what should we think about, you know, like what should we bring, what do we need to bring to our vice president? What, what topics do I need to, as the vice president bring to the CEO or what issues, you know, what help me make the case, I suppose, for the nonprofit that may not be, uh, unwisely, unfortunately, but, uh, doing this type of giving. Well, the first thing I would say is you have a recurring giving program. Whether you call it something or you’ve actually spent any time on it, whether it’s any good. I have not met a nonprofit that does not have donors who have chosen to give on a recurring basis. The question is whether or not you’re taking advantage of that and whether or not you are creating growth. It actually again reminds me of the early days of digital, where I would, I would go and, uh, to a charity and I would say, hey, I think we can really help grow your, you know, your online giving. And they would say, oh, it’s already growing 20% a year. And I would be, and I would say, but how fast could it be growing because the reality is just with adoption, people are going to choose of their own volition. You know, in this, in the case of digital, to give online, in the case of subscription giving to give on a recurring basis. So first thing I would say is you have recurring giving um going on in your organization and so it’s about understanding what is that today and then what could it be in the future. I am a huge believer in the potential and, and really painting the picture for that. So I always like to ask people, you know, how many, how much, how many donors do you have today? How much are they giving on a recurring basis, because Nobody’s starting from zero, and that’s actually the good news. So that’s the first thing I would do, um, uh, certainly give them a copy of the book, that’s apparently, uh, work, uh, the book’s only been out, Tony, but, uh, just for a month as we record this, but it’s been really powerful when you have that kind of like I could try to convince you of something or I could let this third party podcast episode or you know or actual book, um, uh, you know, do some convincing for me, um, but. I think it’s really just recognizing that you do have a recurring giving program. The question is, are you going to do anything about it? And, um, and once you know kind of where you are today, that’s where you can start to um forecast for lack of a better term, like what would it look like to grow this program, and, you know, what, how might that enable our our mission that our organization is trying to accomplish? You’re, you’re thinking, you know, as I was reading. Made me sort of reimagine the work that I do, uh, it’s sort of a different framework. My, my work is planned giving fundraising consulting. You, you listen to the show, so you probably know that, um. You know, and there are, uh, clients that have donors. I’m thinking about a handful of people, but they, they’re doing their recurring giving, they’re just doing it every year. They’re putting $1500 or $20,000 into, you know, on the planiving side into a charitable gift annuity. So you, you got me thinking, you know, well, all right, so. In, in, in my practice, I’m seeing this. I, I don’t think that is recurring giving. I, you know, but what, what value proposition we’re gonna get, you know, we’ll get formally to the, to the value proposition. We’ve, we’ve teased it like 4 times now. We will get to it. I, I promise our listeners, um. You know, but what am I offering these folks, you know, so some of them, uh, have come to expect maybe a comp to the annual gala at which is like a $500 a person ticket. So there’s $1000 you know, that, you know, I, I hesitate to be, uh, too, too, um, lofty in my own like self-aggrandizement, but I meet with them often, you know, there’s that, um, I’ve introduced them to the CEO. And in one case I’m thinking of uh an attorney who I introduced to the chief legal officer at a client. So they’re, so they’re getting it just got me thinking, thinking differently about my work. Yeah, uh, uh, uh, you just gave me a little different framework to think about, um, which was very kind of, uh, opening to me. So thank you. Oh, you’re welcome. Well we’re seeing it in planned, which, you know, you would think, well, planned giving, like that’s the opposite of recurring recurring giving is transactional. No, well, this is what we’re here to learn that sustainable sus sustainer giving is not transactional, that’s not what you want, but the, the, the stereotype is, well, planned giving is totally relational and, and this recurring giving is totally transactional. All right, so we’re here to break that down for you’re wrong about the sustain the sustainer giving. And there is overlap between the two. it was kind of a broadening thing as I was reading the book. Well, and even there’s a reason that you don’t see in the book, uh, save for maybe one or two spots. Um, I don’t refer to it as monthly giving. I refer to it as recurring giving. I didn’t call it I did I make a mistake? No, no, no, but I’m, I’m actually, it, it reinforces the point that you’re making, which is, is planned is at least certain parts of planned giving actually a form of recurring giving. You know, I go back in the, in the early part of the book, the kind of the ancient history studying humanity and Plato and you know, different people around philanthropy and the earliest form of recurring giving was the ancient Jewish people and the practice of what they called first fruits, you know, it’s like if you’re a If you’re a farmer or you’re a shepherd, then you would take the 1st 10% of your crop or your, you know, your livestock, and then you would bring it to the temple, which was the local central, you know, essentially authority for the Jewish people, and they would, um, They would then as a part of that process, they would then feed the, the poor and the widows and, and care for, care for those in need in their society and so that was a form of recurring giving. Now did it happen every month on the 1st and 15th? No, it happened every season, turns out because when you’re an agricultural economy. Uh, that’s when that happens, but this idea of this pattern of, of giving, and I do think we’re seeing lots of areas of fundraising, including plan giving, including what I would call major gifts, you know, middle or major gifts that are seeing their own influences, um, in recurring giving, you know, I had one client, uh, a couple of months ago, we ran a campaign. For new, you know, recurring donors to the organization, uh, and they had one donor sign up for $5000 a month, and I said on their credit card, and they said, yep, somebody’s getting a lot of miles, right? Um, but that donor, that’s the, that was the comfortable giving level for them versus another donor that might be $50 a month or or $20 a month, right? And so I do think we’re seeing this form of philanthropy intersect other, you know, uh, areas of philanthropy as well, and it’s all kind of, um, I think working together to increase generosity. I agree, yup, absolutely. We are seeing it. OK, thank you. Now, let’s, let’s talk about some of the incentives uh uh uh that uh you can use to induce folks. To, uh, into sustainable recurring giving, tick off, tick off some of your your favorites from the book. Yeah, you know, and I think with incentives, especially when I write about those in light of the subscription economy, people think again the more the consumer side, and there are certainly incentives that are literal, you know, it’s what we would call a backend premium, you know, like. Uh, you know, I donate and I get a copy of the latest book or I get a, you know, a chotchke of some form, um, and those are a form of incentive, um, really incentives are about helping move the donor to that point of decision, um. So some other incentives that I like though, um, so, uh, classic fundraising, but an absolutely powerful incentive is a match or challenge grant for recurring giving. So not just a sort of we have an overall match, but no, we have a donor that has agreed to match every first gift or the first few months of every, every new recurring donor that signs up. It’s a win from a middle and major donor perspective because you can actually uh use that to say, hey, you can help us multiply giving. Um, but then it’s also a very motivational thing for donors. Um, I’m a big fan of, um, uh, multipliers depending on the organization. So like if some organizations do a lot of like gifts in kind or volunteer service where you can say every gift, uh, every dollar you send results in $30 or $10 worth of impact because of the donated goods we have or the, you know, the volunteer force that we operate, so multiplier. Um, I would call deadlines and goals candidly a form of incentive, you know, um, so I’m a big believer in saying, hey, by this date, because of this very specific need and this very specific reason, we’re looking for, you know, 150, uh, you know, monthly partners to help accomplish this, you know, this vision. Um, and there’s other, there’s others, but those are some of my favorites, um. Could you do the bounce back for me? Explain, explain the bounce back is a device, um, and I, you know, my first job was in direct mail, so it’s it’s a direct mail specific term, but, um, is really a device that you send that then the donor’s gonna return. So I, we used to do this um with some of the shelters we would work with, we would do a Thanksgiving place map. And we would allow, um, donors, we would send the placemats to donors and we would say we were going to use these when we serve the Thanksgiving meals, the week of Thanksgiving. Would you consider writing a note of encouragement to somebody who’s down, you know, um, and that’s like a really beautiful bounce back device because it’s like, yes, I would love to do that, um, for, for those listening that are familiar with the concept of child sponsorship, you know, letter writing is actually a form of a bounce back like I’m gonna write a letter to. To, you know, the, the person that I’m sponsoring, um, so it’s just some sort of involvement device, um, that engages the donor. It’s time for Tony’s Take 2. Thank you, Kate. Another tale from the gym. Uh, an uplifting one, not, not a whiny one like Mrs. Blood and Soil last week. Uplifting There’s a man who comes to the gym. I see him 3 times a week, probably. He comes in in a walker, and he needs help. He has a friend who comes with him each time the friend holds the door. They park the walker alongside the wall, and then the friend helps him over to the bike, stationary bike, and this guy does the stationary bike. He’s certainly 80 plus, uh, could, um, could be mid to at least even could be mid 80s, maybe even a little higher. But there he is Several times a week. Coming in his walker, but he makes the trip and he does the stationary bike for, I don’t know, a long time, you know, I’m not cocking the guy, but he doesn’t just do it for 5 minutes. And then there’s a woman who comes in, not as often as the man in the walker. Uh, she works on the treadmill. And she has supplemental oxygen. She has a cannula. In her nose, and she has a small oxygen bottle in a backpack. And she does the treadmill, and not also not for a short time. We’re not talking 5 minutes. So, Of course I don’t know these people because, uh, I, as we know, I keep to myself in the gym, just try to listen to others and do my business and, and depart. But if the man with the walker who needs help getting from the, from the where he leaves his walker over to the bike, and the woman with the supplemental oxygen, if they can be working out. We all can. They inspire me. They make me realize there’s no excuse when I don’t, you know, sometimes some mornings uh don’t really feel like doing it. I think of, uh, I think of these folks. So if they can do it, we all can. And that is Tony’s take too. OK. I think you should go talk to these people. I mean, I’m not a gym person, so I don’t know like the gym etiquette, but I mean if they don’t have like headphones on, I think you should go like introduce yourself, go talk to these people, see what their story is. You do, right? I don’t know. Uh, neither one of them owns uh headsets, I don’t think. They don’t, no, they’re not wearing AirPods or headsets or anything. I don’t know, you know, I like, I like to keep to myself in the gym, you know, because, especially the man, the man on the uh on the um on the bike, he does a lot of talking on the bike. Um, you know, it’s the chatty, it’s the chattiness I’m trying to avoid. I don’t know. Uncle Tony, you’re a little chatty yourself where you wanna be. Uh, when I want to be, yeah, I turn on the charm. I turned the charm on, but, uh, in the gym, I just, I turn it off, I keep to myself, you know, I’m still the New Yorker. I, it wasn’t, I lived in New York 15 years. I didn’t grow up there. I grew up in New Jersey, but close to New York City, you know, and these folks are, it’s, it’s North Carolina, small town. Different sensibilities, uh, and I’m making, uh, unfair rationalizations, uh, and, and, uh, stereotypes and rationalizations, but these things are important, stereotypes and rationalizations. Right. OK. Well for now. For now, you’d leave it. OK, thank you for now. We’ve got uu but loads more time. Here’s the rest of Great Value and Sustainable Giving with Dave Riley. Do you know the movie about Schmidt with Jack Nicholson? Well, I mean I know it, but I don’t know. He has a pen pal that he’s he’s he writes to this as his life is a spiral down after his wife dies, um, he writes to uh I think it’s, I’m pretty sure it’s. Yeah, so you hear him. Like probably 3 or 4 times in the movie, he’s, you hear a voiceover of him writing to uh to explain how his first world problems are uh spiraling. Well, there is, by the way, a principle in that story, and that is the power of human connection. Um, in fact, the first, um, uh, shelter that I ever worked with on a recurring giving program was called Union Rescue Mission in Los Angeles. I write about them in the book. And the first program I ever worked on, Tony was what they call a meal a day program. So it was this idea of if you give, it costs about, um, at that time with goods and service uh donated goods, it was like $1. $20 or something like that, a meal. Um, and so if you do the math, that’s about $35 a month, pay for $35 a month, you can join our quote unquote meal a day program. But Tony, a couple of things. Number one, it was a ton of work, and number two is it didn’t work very well, like it had a pretty low fulfillment rate. Um, these were in the old check writing days, by the way, that’s how long I’ve been in this industry, um. And um you’re gonna have a hard time dating because I’m 63, so you’re you look like 40 something, so you’re a way to go, yeah, 43. I’m right behind you. Um, the, but the, um, the reason I bring that up is because what one of the things we did that when we pivoted the program was we made it. About the actual guests at the at the mission. Now you had to be careful, uh, you know, privacy, all those sorts of things, but we made it about, um, this idea of you are helping to care for the women, children and families that are at the mission, which at that point was more than 50% of their guests. And Tony, when we shifted from being about meals, which are, if you think about it, inanimate objects that like, well, I guess if I don’t give this month a meal doesn’t happen, sort of abstraction to human connection. To the actual, this is, this is a story of a person and we may have changed their name and, and changed their photo for their privacy, but this is a story of a person you’ve actually directly made a connection with when we made that human connection, the fulfillment rates immediately went up by double digits, like literally overnight, we pivoted from meal a day to this representative sponsorship, and it was a huge lift in fulfillment because we made that human to human connection. So I think of Nicholson and his, uh, pen pal apparently. Yeah it was that human to human connection. How did you get to uh the Union rescue mission? The, the, it sounds like I just kind of hearing your voice that that work really moved you. How did you, how did you get into that work? Well, I grew up in Southern California was was really the part of the reason why it so moved me, and I remember, um, volunteering in high school at um at uh one of the missions downtown San Julian and San Pedro Street, right there, Skid Row, the original Skid Row, Los Angeles. And, and you say in the book that’s one of the most dangerous places in the country. Yeah, it’s one of the most difficult place to this day, it’s yeah, it’s it’s a difficult environment, um, and I’ve I slept at the mission downtown and, um, and served and uh so for me, my first realization that I could do um professionally. The kind of work that I, uh, feel like I’ve really am, am wired for the marketing and fundraising and business and, you know, that kind of stuff. Uh, Tony, the first time I realized that was when I, um, got a job at a fundraising agency. Um, this was 20 years ago, uh, called Master Works, and it was the realization that wait a second, I actually actually could have a career, professional, fulfilling career where I actually am able to help. Uh, causes, um, and the first client I ever had, Tony was Union Rescue mission. So it was, it was doubly, it was a double whammy. It was a personal passion of mine, having grown up in Southern California and having experienced that, but then also right at the point where I realized that my life’s work could be about helping with uh issues and situations like that. And so it’s just, it’s always been close to my heart. How old were you when you started the volunteer work? Oh, the first time I probably went down to Skid Row, I would, I would have been a teenager, um, yeah, early high school, you know, 1516, something like that. That’s not for 15 or 16 year old. What do you remember what was it, was it your parents or what moved you where most people are hanging out with their boyfriends and girlfriends. You know, I, um, it was a school related activity. It was a, it was a, uh, one of the missions down there that did like a shoe exchange, you know, donate, uh, lightly used shoes and then we pair them up with people and so I remember it was the one of the high school teachers that, um, basically said, hey, we’re getting on a bus, we’re going down, we’re going downtown. So then you’re like literally, I was, you know, sorting shoes and stuff, but then you’re helping, you know, uh, individuals find shoes that were great for them and their needs and I just, I still remember that today. And candidly, you know, I just wrote about this week the the question of are we teaching generosity to our children, um, Tony, because now fast forward however many years, 25, 30 years, uh, from that point. Um, I’m a dad, you know, I have two daughters, they’re ages 11 and 14, and I’m asking the question, like, am I, are they seeing me and my wife display generosity? Are they have are, are, are they having experiences that they’ll be able to tell 30 years from now that impact the way they choose to live out generosity in their own lives. Um, and so it’s been a more introspective time, uh, but yeah, thanks for asking that question. And how do you think you can motivate an 11 and 14 year old to, to, to be generous? Oh, I love that. Um, so the first thing, and I was just, this was very top of mind, so the first thing is to, um, make it visible. I think so much of generosity these days can be invisible, and I mean, this coming from a guy who literally just wrote a book about recurring giving, which is generally automated and You know, EFT or, you know, ACH preferably or credit card. And so the first thing that I think especially for us today is how do we make that visible, um, and Uh, that’s the first one. The, the second is, um, how do we, uh, the phrase I use is normalized generosity. I think, um, I think there’s, there can be, uh, an issue with kind of virtue signaling for lack of a better term, like, you know, you look at me, I’m so generous. However, I’ve been guilty of like not talking about my passion for generosity and I think that’s candidly just as. Not just as bad. I don’t know what the right phrase is, but I want, I want my kids, I want the people that are in my life to know that generosity is just a part of who I am. And so in our family, we, we want to do things that help people’s help our kids see that generosity is a way of life. It’s not like, oh, at the holidays, you know, it’s like, no, this is something that we do on an ongoing basis and we actually just had a conversation with our kids. Um, this last week, um, because a local charity, uh, actually it’s a national charity called Atlas Free. They do a lot with human trafficking. Um, our local church actually partnered with Atlas Free to do a, um, a, a program called Freedom February, and there was this idea of the phrase they use is do what you love to fight what you hate. And so do something that you’re passionate about, but essentially raise money to help fight human trafficking. And so my girls, um, on their own said, we wanna, you know, we want to do baked, you know, goods for, uh, for, for, uh, fighting human trafficking. And so my oldest made French macarons. We just spent some time in France, so she’s all about that. My youngest made cake pops and cookies and they sold them. And it was so cool. I have a picture on our website of them at the at the the the Sunday market, you know, selling their, their baked goods, and just the joy on their faces. Number one, they got to do what they love. They actually really do enjoy baking, but this idea of like we are making a difference and, um, I think that’s a memory, I hope, and I think they will, will stay with them for the rest of their lives and will maybe subliminally but will shape future decisions that they have around generosity and the joy of giving. No, you’re, you’re clearly thinking through it for your, for your children, um. Let’s go back to the book. Thank you for a little, uh, personal digression. Uh, we, uh, teased a couple of times, as I said, the, the value proposition. Now this is all part of your, uh, 76 or 7? No, he’s 77 steps, 7 steps to a thriving sustainer program, right? Uh, we don’t have time for all 7. You just, you gotta get the book because, uh, you know, we’re gonna, we’re just gonna, we had a couple. Uh, I would really like to talk about the crafting, uh, your, it’s your number 3, crafting. The an ongoing value proposition. So here’s where we’re explicitly defeating the Myth misunderstanding that this is transactional work, not at all, not at all. Uh, give us your, give us your thinking about, uh, you, you, you make it clear it has to be holistic, you know, ongoing quarter in the slot on, on the value proposition. Absolutely, yeah, you know, in in classic fundraising, you know, that we talk about the offer, you know, how, you know, how much will, you know, a dollar do kind of a deal, and this is an expansion of that. Um, and I do borrow a lot and quote in the book, the, the folks at Next after, they’ve done a lot of work on what I would call single gift value propositions, so like what is, what does it look like to create a value proposition for a single gift, but really it’s not a big stretch to say, OK, what does an ongoing value proposition look like? And so, Um, so a couple things. Number 11 of the mistakes I see organizations make is they use their single gift value proposition and they just say, hey, would you give us that monthly? So, Union rescue mission, classic example, the best single gift offer for the the mission was a meal and shelter, was this like, you know, very low on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, it was a survival need. It was very easy, easy math, you know, $1 could basically a little more than $1 could provide a meal. Um, but like I said, the meal a day program, which is equivalent equivalent of saying let’s take our best single gift offer and just ask for that monthly, was the meal a day program. The fulfillment rates were not good. Um, so, so the first thing is I would just say be careful not to just assume that your best fundraising offer that you might use for single gifts is the same as your best fundraising offer for ongoing recurring giving. So some things to look for as you um define your ongoing value proposition. Um, the first thing is just to be super clear on the problem your organization exists to solve. Then, The second step is to really list out what I call your value claims, and again, this is borrowed heavily from the folks at Next after, but what are those things that are um Uh, that, that That are unique to your organization that helps to answer the question of, yes, we are the solution for this particular problem. Um, and then what you want to do is you list out those value claims, then you, uh, prioritize those. And the best way I know to do that is to actually talk to donors. Um, and so I don’t mean that euphemistically, by the way, Tony, I mean actually talk to don’t like call them, set up interviews, talk to donors. I’ve done that a lot with organizations as a third party, um, but until you actually understand what really motivates the donor and fires their imagination. Then, um, you, you’re just going to be guessing, you know, so talk to donors, and then I would say make sure you answer the question, why is this necessary on an ongoing basis? Because again, unlike uh single gifts, this is a donation that will hopefully be made month after month, year after year, and so you want to have a very clear ongoing need and the ability to then affirm the donor on an ongoing basis as they get towards that need. You make the point too that you should try to target um survival, safety, belonging, those again, those basic sort of Maslow needs. I think every organization has the ability to communicate its need in those sort of lower level survival, safety and belonging needs. And I think, and this is especially for organizations that tend to be a little bit more maybe esoteric or a little more um. Philosophical, you know, we help equip people with knowledge, which is true, but I think the question to for me to that type of a charity is, how does what you do contribute to the survival, safety or belonging of the people that you serve? And um, it’s so important to articulate your need in those terms and not in these kind of like higher functioning self fulfillment. You know, kind of needs, it’s just, um, and that’s really a classic fundraising lesson, you know, the, the more we can talk about how what we’re doing contributes to the survival, safety or belonging of the people we serve, the more just candidly emotionally resonant, um, the program will be with donors. Which one of your other seven steps, uh, to a thriving program? What do you, I’m feeling, I’m feeling very altruistic. We’re talking about talking about your daughters and now what which one what do you want to talk about? Well, we’ve had really two. We’ve hit the first one which is to benchmark your program and by the way, we do have a a vet blueprint guide, um, that is free, uh, Tony, so if folks want to get that, they can get that at sustainablegiving.org. Um, but so the first one we had is a benchmark your program, which is just how many, how much, how many donors do you have today? How much are they giving, and, and that’s a great place to start, crafting an ongoing value proposition and then, you know, just to pick one, I would say, um. I would say let’s talk a little bit about growing your program because that’s hard for you to pick, it’s hard for you to pick a favorite. They’re all my children. Yeah, so the 6th step is really to grow your program and I want to just point out one, there’s a number of things we cover in that that chapter, but one of the things we talk about is sometimes organizations make the mistake of focusing on the wrong growth lever. Um, so there’s two ways to get more new donors into your recurring donor program. Number 1, acquisition, straight, the first gift is a recurring gift, and then number 2 is what I would call conversion, and that is they’re an existing donor, single gift owner, and that you’re and they are becoming choosing to give on a, on a recurring basis. And the mistake I see is that organizations will focus on the wrong one of those two. and so they will be, for example, an organization that really their offer and who they are is really um tuned to them being what I would call a conversion focused organization, where really the best, most significant um success they’re going to see is by acquiring donors as single gift owners and then converting them to recurring. Um, but the mistake I see is I come in and they say, well, we’re running, you know, um, I don’t want to knock a channel, we’re running ads, uh, specifically for acquiring new donors, but nobody’s responding, and it’s like, well, actually your offer and your program are much more conducive to getting a donor in the door and then converting them. And then vice versa, sometimes organizations are very conversion focused when they could be acquisition focused. And so in the book, I’d say, what are the, the, the basic um components of an offer that is more conducive to acquisition. So just for example, um if it’s a highly visible need, very clear solution. Um, and it’s got a very clear specific price point and it’s widely understood. So, uh, for example, uh, not a client, but an organization I’ve respected over the years, Operation Smile. Uh, one of the things they do life saving surgeries, operations, certainly cleft palate, uh, surgeries. And it costs about, I think it was $270 to do a surgery. That’s a perfect acquisition offer because it’s super visible. Like you can literally, photos and video can tell the story of Operation Smile without doing anything else. It’s a very clear solution. We do these surgeries, very specific, you know, need, uh, an offer amount, $270 to a surgery, and that’s like a slam dunk for acquisition. Um, but a lot of organizations, and I would say a majority are more their uh their need, the need is takes a little explaining, um, the offer is not as clear and so it’s more about how do we get donors into the, the front door, giving that first gift and then. Move them candidly within 30 to 60 days, typically to then giving a monthly gift or or a recurring gift. And so that’s just one of the the levers and I write about that in the book of how do you know which one you should maybe uh uh put more emphasis in. You make the point in the book about the 30 to 60 day period. That’s the, that’s the period where people are most likely to convert. You want to flush it out a little bit? Yeah, it’s, it’s the, you know, people ask me when is the most likely time for a new, new single gift owner to convert, and we’ve already answered it, but it’s really right away. It’s that 1st 30, 60 days and I don’t know exactly why I have some hypotheses, you know, I think one of the reasons is that is the point in time when it’s the most fresh to that donor. They’ve made an initial decision to give a gift. Um, and by the way, this is a beautiful thing when you do have crisis type fundraising or disaster funding because those have classically been the most difficult donors to. Get to give a second gift. Um, but thanks to the subscription economy, we are all much more wired to be, uh, willing to do that and so. Um, you have the opportunity to basically within that 1st, 60 days to say, uh, basically two things affirm and invite, affirm that gift, you have made a difference. Thank you so much. You are the type of person that cares deeply about this cause, so you’re affirming, affirming, inferring, but you’re also very directly and indirectly inviting them to stand with the organization on an ongoing basis. And when I do a curve of um when people are most likely to uh convert, the highest time is always in that 1st 30 to 60 days, and then it falls candidly off a cliff for a while and then about a year later it might bump up again. So I’m not saying you can’t get people to convert to monthly giving on an ongoing basis, but that first introduction is, is really one of the most critical windows to uh to do that. You have a little advice on uh naming your sustainer program that that struck me because I, I have a sort of contrary opinion about naming, uh, what I don’t like legacy society, you know, plan giving recognition societies like stay away from legacy and heritage, please. There’s like ubiquitous, it could be anywhere, it could be any charity anywhere leg the legacy society, but share your advice about naming the recurring giving program. I think the short version is, um, and I think I opened that chapter with the Shakespeare quote, you know, um, you know, what a rose by a name, smells sweet, right? But I do think having a name meaning something that you can refer to as essentially a proper noun of the program is helpful because then when you’re referring to it in communications or you’re referring to them, the recurring donor, there’s like the shorthand, there’s the name, where a blank. I think it does create belonging. Um, but, and I outlined in the in the uh chapter on designing your program, really there’s two broad ways to do that, and I don’t think there’s a right or wrong answer here, but one way is what I would call descriptive naming and so that’s like, um, basically it’s our, uh, friends of the family program where you’re literally describing the program, and then there’s what I would call fanciful naming. Um, and that is where it might be more of a metaphor, you know, like Charity Water has the spring, right? Um, and I give some examples of programs in that chapter, uh, and I wouldn’t prescribe one way or the other, um, fanciful or descriptive, uh, but I would say having a name that you can refer to is actually really helpful and, um, and, and a piece of the puzzle. Beautiful, thank you. And so we still have several minutes together, but I kind of like to close on your, your thoughts about the future. That’s your last chapter in the book, the future of sustain or giving, trends you’re seeing. Uh, in terms of mindset, yeah, you know, it’s one of the things that really caused me a lot of consternation in the first year, uh, since of saying I think I should write a book was. These things are changing, right? So how do you, how do you write a book that is then, um, you know, going to stand some test of time? And I will say, uh, those of you that are fundraisers, you know, there’s there’s some real timeless fundraising principles in the book, and so it’s not just certainly not a fad book, uh, or at least that’s not the goal. But I did feel like it would, I would be very remiss to not um include a section in the book on how recurring giving is continuing to change. And so I break that into a couple of different categories. Um, I talk about, um, where what people might think of in terms of technology and how technology is continuing to shift. Um, you know, there was a, there was a comment you made earlier that I was thinking about, you know, in terms of how people are choosing to give, um, I can’t remember offhand, but the, the, the reality is that um technology is shifting. Um, I think I saw a stat the other day, more than 50%, I don’t remember the exact percentage. Of, of, uh, consumers today prefer to use what is called a digital wallet, right? So that’s the thing where I double click on my phone, um, and I can choose my Apple credit card or my whatever Bank of America credit card. And so, you know, things like, um, that the charity I just mentioned that my daughters um did a fundraiser for Alice Free, I was able to You know, standing at the bake sale, you know, actually go in and make a make a gift and use a digital wallet. That’s a big deal when you’re when you’re not on a computer and I don’t have my credit card handy or whatever. So I do, I do have a chapter on technological advancement. I have a chapter on how AI is actually enabling um some capabilities around. Uh, recurring giving I think is really powerful. Um, I do think the donor experience will continue to evolve. You mentioned the one click checkout. I still don’t think most nonprofits have the equivalent of a one click checkout, so I write about that. Um, and then, um, I write about some, some, uh, innovative ways that organizations are thinking about financing, um, recurring giving. Uh, I’ll give you one simple example because that sounds maybe, uh, pretty high level. Um, some of the most innovative organizations I’ve seen have basically, uh, created a system by which they can reinvest in their recurring giving program from new donors. So they basically talk to their board and they say what we want to do is we bring in 10 thousands or millions of dollars a year. We want to reinvest the first. 10 months of value from any new recurring donor, um, to then grow the program and so what it ends up doing is it basically creates a snowball effect where instead of just Uh, you know, investing whatever the number is, um, every month in a straight line, which creates, by definition, linear growth, like, oh yay, you know, it’s growing. When you double down that investment and double down and double down, you essentially get a compounding curve and so I know of organizations that have grown, um. Double and triple digits because they are, uh, basically reinvesting. They understand the value of a new recurring donor and they’re reinvesting that in. And so that’s not very common today. I don’t see that a lot, but where I do see it, I see really explosive growth and so I wanted to shine a light on some of those trends. And where would you reinvest in in promotion, marketing? Technology, well, it depends on what your growth engine is, um, so for some folks, if they’re more of an acquisition oriented, uh, institution, then acquisition versus do more, yeah, do more, you know, face to face or whatever, um, versus an organization that might be more conversion oriented, it might be like, actually, we need to invest more in our single gift acquisition because we know that’s what fuels the funnel for for recurring. And just generally too, you, you anticipate a sustainer first mindset. Yeah, that’s the, that’s the, I don’t see that um completely across the board, but I couldn’t come away and not see that the some of uh many of I would say the fastest growing charities today have this sustainer first mindset and they either have had that for a long time, you think of organizations like the Compassion, International or World Vision, they’ve had that for a long time. Or, um, Charity Water is a more modern equivalent where they’ve had it for, you know, 89 years and that’s created significant growth, and then now they are, um, sort of diversifying their focus, but is it is this kind of this sustainer first mindset, at least for a significant period of time that seems to have been really correlated with rapid growth. The book is the rise of sustainable giving how the subscription economy is transforming recurring Giv, what nonprofits can do to benefit. Uh, person who wrote it is right here in case you, you probably put those two things together by now. Dave Raley, you’ll find him on LinkedIn, you’ll find the book plus the free resources. At sustainablegiving.org. Dave, thank you. Thank you very much for sharing and, and you have my good wishes for your, your daughter’s philanthropy. Oh, thank you. Well, and I, I hope for, for the rest of us, you know, that’s just it’s a deep passion and I do think that sustainable giving is a part of that. So thank you, thank you for investing the time and reading that book and drawing out those insights and, and, uh, yeah, I’m just, I’m just really uh hopeful for uh for our our sector. Next week, mental wellness amid the political chaos. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor Box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. I love that alliteration. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for February 24, 2025: Prudence In Our Political Environment

Gene Takagi & Amy Sample Ward: Prudence In Our Political Environment

Following from our December episode, “Is It Paranoia Or Prudence?,” Gene Takagi and Amy Sample Ward return with updates from the grass roots on DEI, USAID and other spending freezes, major media capitulation, and information on a potential reincarnation of last year’s H.R. 9495 bill. Most importantly, they share advice and resources on how to cope—and keep your nonprofit in the safest posture. Gene is our legal contributor from NEO Law Group. Amy is our technology contributor and CEO of NTEN.

Gene Takagi

 

 

 

 

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer the embarrassment of metathiciaophobia if you changed your routine and missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer Kate with what’s on the menu. Hey, Tony. I hope our listeners are hungry for prudence in our political environment. Following from our December episode, is it paranoia or prudence? Gene Duagi and Amy Sample Ward return with updates from the grassroots on DEI, USAID, and other spending freezes, major media capitulation, and information on a potential reincarnation of last year’s HR 9495 bill. Most importantly, they share advice and resources on how to cope and keep your nonprofit in the safest posture. Gane is our legal contributor from NO Law Group. Amy is our technology contributor and CEO of N10. On Tony’s Take 2. The activist group I co-host. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor Box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. Here is prudence in our political environment. It’s always a genuine pleasure to welcome back Jean and Amy. Our esteemed contributors at nonprofit Radio, Gene Takagi, our legal contributor and principal of NEO, the nonprofit and exempt organizations law group in San Francisco, he edits that wildly popular nonprofit law blog.com and is a part-time lecturer at Columbia University. You’ll find the firm at Neo Law Group and Jean is at GTA GTAK. Amy Sample Ward, our technology contributor and CEO of N10, they were awarded a 2023 Bosch Foundation fellowship. Yeah, but what have you done lately? That was two years ago. And their most recent co-authored book is The Tech That Comes Next about equity and inclusiveness in technology development. They’re on Blue Sky as Amy Sample Ward. Gene and Amy, welcome back. I never don’t laugh when you say podfather. It puts me in such a good mood, you know, we’re about to talk about like so many sad trombones, but we started with Podfather, so at least I got a laugh while on mute. Thank you very much. I’m glad I’m glad you’ve heard it many times and it still makes you laugh. And can I answer your rhetorical question about As if I had not done anything, which I appreciate in like a there’s a very fatherly way of being like, what have you even done, um, but a plug that was not on our agenda to talk about today, so I’ll just say it and then we can move on with the agenda, yes, go ahead. Um, incredible N0 Community Committee gave feedback and Tristan and I, um, and FUA have refined all that feedback and then the newest version of the equity guide is about to be published, the equity guide for nonprofit technology. That’s Tristan Penn, and then like a whole, you know, a couple dozen community members who met previously and gave feedback about. You know, uh, none of the previous equity guide content is like gone, but I think as time continues to change, we always wanted it to be a living resource and and just this latest iteration. Adds a lot more layers about security, privacy, um, ownership, you know, thinking about. The extent that our decisions around technology kind of weave into so many other, either potential challenges we’re gonna face or or ways of how we’re gonna operate, you know. I admire that N10 is leaning into equity and not uh shrinking away from it, leaning in affirmatively with an update to your equity guide. All right. Well, because that’s part of it, we can certainly get into it, but as a word is it’s not tokenism. It is because we truly believe in equitable world is possible. If we didn’t, why are we here? Why are we doing this work if we don’t think. That beautiful world is possible, you know, and it wouldn’t be beautiful if it wasn’t for all of us. Right, and it’s trying to achieve, uh, something that we may never fully achieve, but the, the journey is Meritorious, valuable, important, worthy, all right. We’re gonna, we’re gonna get to, uh, I don’t know, I don’t, I don’t know if it’s a, I don’t know if it’s a prior restraint on speech, uh, uh, using with token words that you are not using as tokens. I understand that, but, uh, but we’re not, we’re not quite there. So I want to uh open with uh just continuing our conversation from December. We were together in December. We promised listeners we would come back together in February. Here we are. Most of our conversation in Feb in December was devoted to House Resolution HR 9495, which died in the 118th Congress. So now if it’s going to come back, uh, it would have to be uh reintroduced under a new title, but because 9495 died with the old Congress. But it’s certainly, that certainly could happen. Uh, Gene, you have some insights into what, uh, what we, what, what, what, and the, the potential for a reincarnation of the 9495 HR. Yeah, and, um, great to be here with both you and Amy. Uh, first of all, um, HR 9495 did die with the last Congress, but that’s because it passed so late in, in, in, in the congressional year. So, um, as we entered into the new Congress at the beginning of January, um, things have to be reintroduced under a different, uh, name and number. Burr and so we’ll, we’re likely to see this come back again because it passed the House, um, and it didn’t make it through the Senate, but it was not rejected by the Senate. They just didn’t have time to deal with it. The Senate was also uh had a majority of Democrats on uh uh in in their roster at that time, but with the change in Congress at the beginning of the year, now the Republicans control both the House and the Senate. And this vote on HR 9495 was, was very strongly on partisan lines. So if it got reintroduced, there’s a very possible chance um that it gets passed. So it’s something just to, to think about. Um, if that possibility still exists, and we can discuss pros, cons, and, and likelihood and all the rest, but I, I’ll let you tell us where to go, Tony. Well, let’s see, in terms of a new bill, let’s see what does develop. It feels likely to me that something will come. Uh, so when it does, I guess that’s pretty defeatist, but uh it’s what I believe. When it does come, you know, we’ll talk about the details of it because it could be changed from what it, what 94, 95 was, uh, there, there may be changes to it. Um, but also important for folks to know, Gene, that there are other methods through which The executive branch in particular can ah. Cause trouble for nonprofits uh based on uh the the funding activities whether you’re funding or even just talking about people who are perhaps under a terrorist supported organization or supported by a terrorist supported organization or once removed from these, there are some mechanisms that are already out there that exist right today. They don’t need to be passed anew. Yeah, so HR 9495 or whatever its progeny should should be if it’s similar, um, is not the most draconian of of laws, even though it created sort of panic within the sector. Um, there are existing laws on the book that give the executive branch a lot of discretion, uh, to really, um, either revoke 501c3 status from organizations that are. Deemed to support terrorist organizations um or even uh act uh against fundamental established public policy whatever that may be and with our executive branch well you know we we talk about kind of all of the things that are harming the nonprofit sector and all the communities that the nonprofit sector benefits, which is everyone, um. Uh, yes, the executive branch has a whole lot of power to do a lot worse even so this deluge of executive orders and memos and the like, you know, we, we, we’ll get into, but there are other laws out there that can even be exercised that are more tough. The danger with 94, 95 or whatever might come out of it is that it looks. Like it’s a little bit kinder with a little bit more due process than some of the really harsh laws. Now I’m free, I’m afraid that that could be a tool of use to, to be able to justify it and scare the sector by targeting a few organizations and then saying, hey, we’re going to do this to anybody that goes against us. Um, and that’s my general fear. And perhaps making it more palatable because it, it did include due process that uh that other existing regulations don’t include. So could you say though, as you were talking about, you know, I’m just, um, pretending that I’m a listener and not having access to the mic right now while you’re talking and You know, the way you were describing the laws that already exist, access to power that is already available, um, to the executive branch, you use the term terrorist organization. Can you, you know, I think a lot of nonprofits would be like, that’s not us, like we’re safe here, but can you talk a little bit about how that definition is, or how that term is defined and and used or misused? So there are probably dozens of laws that define terrorist organizations in different contexts. This is outside of the tax code, right? So this is. No one’s putting on their 990. Yes, I’m a terrorist. Um, but the fear, I think, and, and why 9495. arose in the legislature is, is, I think, because, not because they wanted another tool to stop terrorism or the support of terrorism. I, I think it arose because, um, there are members of Congress that really did not like that some people were supporting Palestinians in in Gaza and Um, the Palestinians were ruled by Hamas, which was designated a terrorist organization. So Hamas is a terrorist organization in, in our books and just a lot of things. Amy, just to your, your whimsical point, you, you, you could have a 990 that mentions support for Palestinians, right? Yeah, and so what is the algorithm that they’re going to use to say, hey, let’s take a closer look at this organization, throw a wrench in their operations, maybe have the right to take away their 501c3 status? What 9495 doesn’t do, which we mentioned in the last show, but I, I think it’s worth reiterating, is it does not stop you from operating. It just takes away your 501c3 status. So again, A less harsh tool than they already have in the books, um, but one that might be used because it looks better. And when we talked about due process, Tony, let’s put that in quotation marks because there are some outs from some of those due process protections as well, so. Save it for another show because again it could get redefined in the new bill. All right, all right, cool. Um, Amy, let’s go off with the guide. Uh, we’ve got, uh, we’ve got a chilling around a chilling hostility toward diversity, equity, inclusion, belonging. Uh, uh, all as, you know, illegal discrimination. I mean, if you get into the, if you get into the text of the, the one order anyway, the one executive order, uh, 14173 talks about ending illegal. Diversity, equity, inclusion, discrimination, uh, but, but that it’s not currently illegal, but I’m not sure that qualification really matters. It’s, it’s, it’s having a chilling effect on Websites, um, I don’t know if it’s going as deep as mission statements. Maybe it is, Amy, maybe you’re hearing some of that, uh, but I mean, I’m reading about websites being prophylactically scrubbed of language that the administration deems, uh, inappropriate and is hostile to. Uh, Amy, why don’t you share what you’re what you’re hearing from folks? Yeah, I think there is. Um, you know, if, if anyone ever watched, uh, Thomas the Tank Engine or read Thomas the Tank Engine, they say all the time, confusion and delay, that is what is happening. So much confusion and delay, right? It’s Ringo Starr, right? Ringo Starr the station manager, it’s it’s Ringo Starr saying that, isn’t it? Yeah. Um. That’s like the nice way to put it, of course, right? Like there’s already. Countless documented actual harms, deaths, delayed or stopped medical interventions. Like all of these things have come. I’m not trying to downplay it with Thomas the Tank Engine, but maybe make it light enough that we can keep having a conversation, um, because otherwise, like, the reality is super, super hard, and I don’t want to deny that. Um, I think we’re hearing from a lot of organizations who And N10 has had this conversation too, of how do we navigate. Keeping our staff and our either service recipients or program participants or, you know, beneficiaries of our mission, what whatever it is safe so that we can continue to do this work. Like we don’t want to stop the work that we do, but, but how do we stay safe enough that we’re employed to do it or that, you know, we are able to offer these programs and. Um, I welcome Jean’s insights, but I think that question is kind of a recurring theme with maybe answers that are different every day for organizations, right? Like they’re coming up with, OK, today, like things are a little different, this is what that’s gonna look like. We’re hearing from, you know, I think a lot of the websites or service providers that I’ve at least seen, not that I have a chronicle of the entire internet, um, despite what you may think, but the folks I’ve seen doing the most proactive scrubbing are folks. Either completely reliant or predominantly funded by the government. And so that is less about the language of of executive orders and much more about the actual felt pause or discontinuation of funding, you know, and, and wanting that piece to not be the barrier. And I think there’s a lot of arguments. That are super valid about not scrubbing that, you know, if you invisibilize community members, you are not serving them in those services, cause they don’t know that it’s safe to still get services from you, and maybe it isn’t safe to still get services from you. And because we are in a world, and we are complex humans, multiple things can be true at the same time. That is true and I want to create space to say that that is also a potential mechanism for keeping staff and patients safe so that they can continue to operate, right? So it’s both troubling and not helpful to invisibilize communities by erasing that language from your website, and also if that allows you to get funding so long as you’re still serving them, and they are safe and protected. You know, it, it is complex, um, but I think that’s the kind of scenario we’re hearing from organizations that they’re trying to balance. Where there isn’t a right answer, and, and also none of the answers maybe feel good, but they’re trying to, you know, what can you do on your website versus what could you do in your services, um. I think another place of real worry, and this goes back to conversations, um, Jean and I have had with you, Tony, about 94, 95, and, and other, uh, powers that many administrations have used to come for organizations, and that is the incredible data that we have been entrusted with as nonprofits, and that that Less of our mission or our services, or even honestly our staff, but just the database we have that says these are all the people who needed X, Y, and Z service, that’s, that’s the thing, um, that’s gonna have even more targeting, and so we’re also hearing from a lot of folks who Well, this is not a new practice for the federal government to come for your list and really want to know who’s accessing certain services or benefiting from certain missions. Because of the level of rhetoric around the White House right now, I think folks who have had the privilege to not be threatened by that in the past are now thinking about it, really, for the first time, right? And thinking, OK, what does it look like to Create our database where all of the demographic information for, say, participants in our programs is animized, and we are just never connecting that to individual records. What does it look like to, you know, what, what can we do? It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s Donor Box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you, a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges. Helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs. Helping you, help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now back to Prudence in our political environment. Gene, you’re getting a lot of calls I know as well, folks just with generalized concerns or maybe more specific based on their work, but what, uh, what are you able to tell folks? How, how are you reassuring or, or maybe it’s not reassuring, but what are you sharing with folks? Yeah, I mean what Amy talked about in terms of the complexity and. Um, basically one size doesn’t or one solution doesn’t fit everybody’s, um, sort of needs. Um, I, I think one of the first things I talk about is if you’re going to make decisions on what you’re going to do, whether it be scrub your website or change your programs or change your mission or or whatever, or advocate and fight against, you know, uh, uh, what the government is doing. You wanna do that on an informed basis, so you wanna make sure that you are talking with your communities, your stakeholders, um, your board should definitely be involved um and assessing kind of the risks and the risk tolerances you might have, what you’re threatened with, um, uh, if things go bad, talking about sort of contingency planning. Uh, of, of, or scenario planning about what might happen if you were to go on this course and sort of mapping it all out and saying, OK, what is the best direction for our organization. So I think. Um, from a governance role, from the board role, that would sort of be my first step is get your board involved and make sure you’re hearing from them some pieces of information that you might not have and, and, and vice versa as well. Talk to your employees, talk to your beneficiaries, and we talked about, um, having, uh, uh, town town hall type meetings, um, you know, uh, that may be a good thing to start out with. In terms of being informed, there’s so much misinformation out there and and part of it is intentional coming from the government, right? Again, they want to scare the sector as a whole or the sector writ large into compliance with what their policy aims are, um, and this is extreme now but it it is kind of that’s how governments tend to operate, you know, generally speaking, and now we’re just at a very extreme level of how far they want to get into it. Um, so it is assessing now, um, you know, those executive orders definitely if you’re receiving federal funding that’s discretionary, right? They can fund who they want and so if they put parameters around that about if you say you have a DEI policy we’re not gonna fund you, that places an entirely different risk tolerance on organizations that rely on federal funding. Now for the organization that doesn’t get any federal funding. To to sort of follow what the organizations that get federal funding and scrub all the DEI off their website if DEI is a core value and part of their mission. That may not be the right thing to do there for all the reasons Amy said because you’re trying to fight for your community, including your, you know, your beneficiaries in the future and if you give up on all of this and if everybody gave up on all of this, um, your organization and its mission are gonna really suffer and your beneficiaries are gonna suffer and the ecosystem that you’re in your environments are gonna suffer and communities are gonna suffer so it really is just something to think about and so for those. Looking at the executive orders closely, you’ve said the term properly, Tony, the executive orders are going after illegal DEI and DEI isn’t. A a real thing that you can grab a hold of, right? It’s diversity, equity and inclusion. Well, the words aren’t illegal, so what would be illegal? Something illegal would be saying like we are only going to hire a BOC individual to be our executive director. We won’t look at anybody else. That is illegal. So if you use race to base a decision on employment, that is illegal, um. The the fearless fund issue that I think we have also talked about yeah that has to do with making and enforcing contracts based on race. So that would say be like I will only enter into a contract if you are white or if you are black or if you are an indigenous or Native American person. You can’t do that either, right? So you can’t make or enforce a contract based on race. Where this gets dicey now is if you say we wanna run a program to, you know, address uh historical and systemic discrimination against a particular race or or races. If you structure that as a contract, like if you say you can participate in our program, but in return you must do this. Hm. If you make it as a contract which would fearless fund had too much contractual language in there, which is why they settled, it would have been bad precedent for the sector. Now there are other arguments for why that law shouldn’t be applied in this way when it was originally created in the 1860s, by the way, it was to protect black people who were formerly enslaved, um, from being. You know, taken away from, from, uh, the right to enforce contracts because you weren’t white. Um, that is, you know, it’s even mentioned in the statute, and now it’s being flipped in the, you know, reverse discrimination. But Jean, the other side of that, that I wanted to bring up, I’m glad you brought up Fearless Fun. That was, that was one side. And the other side is, was it last week? Time is an accordion. I don’t, I don’t know, uh, when this happened. But I think it was last week I saw the Missouri AG. With the suit against Starbucks, saying that the the Starbucks workforce, which is probably like a million employees worldwide, but probably just looking at the US is majority. Not men and majority, not white. And so that means it’s like it’s a proof of illegal DEI hiring or something. But as soon as I said that, my first thought, and Jean, tell tell me if I should stand down on my anxiety spirals of everything, um. But my first thought was, OK, well, like, let’s take a quick gander at the nonprofit sectors, demographics. Guess what are also majority, not men, major, you know, like, of course, because they’re is it that’s just the, oh my God, OK, yeah, because diversity is a value and because we’re, we’re basing our decisions that I’m gonna say like 98.5% of them on, on. Uh, the content of your character and your credentials, whether formal or informal for the job and not and not the color of your skin and your race. All right, so let’s, but yeah, Gene, Amy’s Amy’s pleading. Yeah, so the way it read in the media, at least the media I read, it’s a ridiculous lawsuit in Missouri. Um, I don’t know if there’s something deeper into that, that the news media didn’t pick up, but, um, and, and you can see I’m, I’m CYA because I’m a lawyer, um. Uh, but yeah, that seems ridiculous, but it does raise actually a great point of state laws can even be worse than federal laws, um, so, uh, you know, um, depending upon what state you’re in, I’m in California, so our, our laws are pretty. You know, OK, relative to the federal laws in terms of how hostile or friendly they are to nonprofits, but there are other states where that may not be true and Miss Missouri might be an example of where there are, you know, state laws that can be used as a basis for attacking a nonprofit, but this is to say that if I were to go into any nonprofit organization and you left me with a few hours to look at their books, I could probably find some sort of violation there. Um, cleaning up compliance on general things like making sure you’re registered with the state, um, and if you’re in multiple states, like figuring out which ones you need to register in, because that is a really easy way to close you down without there being any fuss. You just didn’t meet the requirements and boom. You have a whole, you have an article on this. We’re gonna let’s let’s talk about it in nonprofit quarterly. Uh, yeah, it’s so it’s right, if they want to, if they want to find something. You’re right, Gene, probably 2 hours, 2 hours with any person’s, uh, tax, tax history would probably incriminate them and, and subject them to, to sanction for, for no for noncompliance. So, I, uh, I wanna preface just with your so folks can find the article, it’s in nonprofit Quarterly. Gene wrote it, so you’re looking for the byline by Gene Takagi, it was January 20th, 2025. Nonprofit legal compliance in an unfriendly political environment you find that in nonprofit quarterly. Gene, let’s tick off some of the things that could easily, uh, be much more, well, I don’t know, much more troublesome, could easily be troublesome irrespective of what your mission is, what your website says, what values you hold deeply, just, uh, fundamental compliance things that And housekeeping that may not have been paid as much attention to as they should be, and now they ought to be. Yeah, so you know some of the fundamental things are just making sure you’re qualified to do business in a particular state. So if you’re incorporated in New York, that doesn’t give you the right to operate in Texas or in California, right? So a lot of people talk about registration, which is sort of in your sort of corner of the world too, Tony, make sure your solicitations are registered in all the states where you’re soliciting. But qualification to do business is not specific to charities. It’s to for-profits, it’s to nonprofits who aren’t charities, um, and it’s a different filing. You have to do both. Like, so if you have boots on the ground or you have programs in another state, um. As long as for lawyers out there you meet minimum contacts, uh, requirements and you have to be qualified to do business there and that may be a filing with the Secretary of State or someone other than the charities regulator. So the charities regulation stuff is above and beyond that you could get shut down for either missing either filing so. To to be aware of that now if it’s not your state of incorporation um they can only shut you down in your activities in that particular state, but as Amy knows with our technology now how do you do that? Like if you have members and donors and. In some state, how do you shut off one and not the other and now when we use charitable fundraising platforms like PayPal and stuff, they say, hey, if you are noncompliant in any state, we’re shutting you all down because we don’t want to get in trouble either. So now that wipes off all of your online fundraising through that platform, um, which can really harm organizations. So that is a big one, so qualifications as well as registrations. Gene, let’s talk about, uh, even more fundamental, uh, adhering to your mission, adhering to your, uh, your originating documents, your articles of incorporation, your bylaws, are you running the organization the way your bylaws say? Uh, all right, so I ticked off a couple, you’re bored. The duties of care and loyalty or as your, so I’m, I’m glossing over because I’m not the practicing attorney that Gene is, so, but. Uh, I’m not qualified to go any deeper. I’m a good, you know, like I’m a good surface scratcher. That, that’s just no, uh, in, in a lot of things that’s true, but, uh, Gene, please help me, get me out of this morass that I just, uh, got myself into. Uh, some of the, the more basic things about your, your work and your originating documents that you need to be adhering to. Yeah, so articles and bylaws really important because a lot of organizations have really old articles and bylaws that they haven’t been looking at. Their mission statements or their practices may have now changed from what the bylaws or the articles originally contemplated. That could be a reason for shutting you down or for removing your board members and having it replaced maybe by a receiver um who sides with whatever the state priorities are so you could find your organization and it’s control who controls that organization changed because you’re not compliant. So again, an easy way to say. We’re gonna shut you down not because of your policies. We don’t have to go there. We’re gonna shut you down for you didn’t follow your articles and bylaws. Your articles say you only operate in, you know, ABC County, but now you’re in EFG County as well, like you’re, you’re operating. Against the law, we’re shutting you down. Um, so be very, very careful. I know, again, some states would not even think of that, like would not think to do that. But other states may not. Well, Jean, I’ve been on boards of other organizations where, because those are quite important documents, there’s this preciousness to the bylaws that they can’t be touched. And You know, the response I got when I said, well, we can just take a vote and change our bylaws was like blasphemy, right? You can amend your you can amend your bylaws, just follow the bylaws in the bylaws, right? Is that right? Right. But I mean, you know, as a nonprofit, for example, Every 2 years, we are making sure, is this document reflective of how we want to be operating, right? And, and really looking through it. So I don’t know, Gene, if you wanna say something that like to Tony’s point comes from you and not from me, uh, but yes, like, go change your bylaws. Don’t just hear the feedback of like, make sure you’re in compliance, but also update them, make them something you want to be in compliance with. I love that Amy um and the regular, you know, schedule that that antenna is looking at. I do, I, I, I am concerned with a lot of nonprofits can’t really afford a lot of legal help, a lot of pro bono help doesn’t understand this area very well. The bylaws can seem a little overwhelming to boards who don’t understand all that legalese in there. Right. Um, so I’m, am a little cognizant of that. There are certain areas though where you should just look and you can tell, are we in compliance or not? How often are we meeting? How many board members do we have? Are we really having elections as they are supposed to happen and not just letting board members stay on because we like them, um, and you don’t need a lawyer if I mean you could. I would advocate that you still have a lawyer look at it, but if the only thing in your bylaws you were changing was our board is Whatever, 7 to 12 members, and now you realize you really want more board members and you’re changing it from 12 to 20. You’re not changing the terms, you’re not changing anything else. Just change those two numbers. Take a vote formally at your next board meeting and like, great, now you have updated. You know, I don’t want folks to feel like You’re not smart enough or you’re not qualified to review those and and want to make changes. Yeah, I hate to be sort of the proponent of something I heard Elon Musk who, who has all of your individual tax records as I was thinking when you mentioned that, Tony. Um, but, um, you don’t want perfect to be sort of the, the enemy of good here. Yeah, so you just have to be very, very careful of that. And, and as a side note, Elon said that about saying we’re spending $50 million of USAID money on condoms for Hamas, um, so. And then he said that quote is not generally attributed to him, like certainly been around, yeah, just like all right let me get out of the morass that the rabbit hole you just entered. um, all right, so now, Amy, you do make a very good point. The, the, the, the point that we’re all making is just be consistent. Your, your documents and your true operations need to be the same. So if the bylaws are out of date, work on amending. You don’t have to change the way you’re operating, just get the bylaws up to date with, you know, now you’re meeting 4 times a year instead of the 3 times a year that your bylaws say. All right. Well, and just can I make a technology point about that consistency too, um, this came up last week when I was presenting at the Alabama State Association um um state nonprofit association summit and talking about data and policies in a place where there’s not that consistency between maybe privacy policy you have and how staff manage the database or, or, you know, data from programs um place whatever the scenario is, and really Uh, inviting listeners to put on the calendar a good hour in tomorrow or in an upcoming day, to look at all the data that you’re collecting and say, do we need to collect all of this? It’s a lot of work to protect your data, and it is less work if you have less data, right? And so, if you’re never, if you’re never gonna Need uh one of those fields, or you know that you’re really only looking at, say, for our conversation here, demographic data. For the whole year, once a year, you can either stop collecting things or collect it differently or store it differently, that already sets you up to make it safer and and more protected. And so thinking about not just do we have a privacy policy, do we have a data retention policy? Like, please make sure you have those types of things and and that you’re practicing them, but also looking at those, just like you. Bylaws and saying, gosh, this privacy policy was written when we were formed in 2005, and like, is irrelevant to us now. We need to update these policies. And with that, we need to update our, our practices, um, and how we actually operate, um, because there is a lot that would be. At stake, um, if, if your data was compromised or subpoenaed or whatever, and so even these kind of practical pieces help that. I, I, I agree 100%. And just as an example, like if you, the lawyer signs off on what I said, I feel like I did it right, you know. Uh, if ICE, you know, comes and visits your nonprofit organization and demands sort of records of individuals who benefited from your organization’s services and you know, you have data going back years that you have no need to keep, and all of a sudden you’re turning all of that over. Um, think what harm that could be doing to your communities. It doesn’t matter whether they actually end up, you know, having anybody that’s relevant to ICE, but they could just terrorize the people that you’re trying to serve. And I think, you know, a common, when I’ve brought up an example like that, or, you know, Maybe you do pro bono legal clinics and you have this whole many years record of who’s come to those clinics. You probably don’t need that, but I, I hear the. The pushback or the question from a lot of different nonprofit staff saying, yeah, but like, how, we don’t want to delete that. We wanna know, OK, in 2010 we had 100 people, but then by 2014, we were serving 500 people. Great. You don’t need to know that it was Jean Takagi at this address in California that was one of those 100. You just need to know that there were 100, right? Or maybe you want to know that. It was client A who lived in California versus client B who lived in Colorado. Great. But, but again, you, you don’t need all of that data probably. And the more that you can get rid of, or not even collect in the first place, helps in the situation Gene’s talking about when someone comes in and says, hand it over, what are you really having to hand over then, you know, OK, well, here’s a list of counties, Godspeed to you, you know. It’s time for Tony’s take 2. Thank you, Kate. I co-host a. Nonprofit activist group. We are the nascent nonprofit activist group. We met once in December, we met again in February. We’re gonna try to keep up a meeting a month. Um, there’s about 40 people or so who joined the meetings, about 65 on our email list. And we’re talking about the issues that Gene and Amy and I are talking about on today’s show. So if you’d like to be be more activist than than just listening and, and dealing with this on your own, uh, we’re, we’re supportive, you know, there’s a lot of cross talk, it’s not, it’s not all 11 directional talk. Uh, we are helping each other and we are gonna be, after these two meetings now, we’ve had sort of informational, we had a guest speaker who I’m probably gonna have on the show in the, in the next few weeks, um. And so if you would like to be part of our supportive activist group, it’s very easy. Just email me, Tony at Tony Martignetti.com. I, I need your, just, I need your name and email. And uh you can also use uh the contact page at Tony Martignetti.com. I’m co-hosting this group with Beth Kanter and Jay Frost. They have both been on the show multiple times. You may know them in their own work as well. So the three of us are co-hosting this the the nascent nonprofit activist group. Please join us if uh you think that uh we can help you and if you have something to contribute to the group. That is Tony’s take too. Kate, I don’t have much to add this time other than I think it’s really cool to see these um conversations popping up um with, you know, the new administration and All the change that’s going on and the uncertainty, um, I mean, even in classes, we’re actually sitting down, putting aside the curriculum for a second, but in our education course we’re having these conversations in class, trying not to keep it political, but I think having that conversation is so important. It is, it’s so supportive, so that you know, you know, in your class, you know that you’re not the only one having concerns. I mean, you’re in an education curriculum and the Department of Education is at risk. That, that, uh, that can be very troublesome. The Department of Education sets standards, spends billions of dollars on public education. Etc. So yes, just in terms of support, knowing you’re not the only one with concerns, and then also this activist group is, you know, we’re, we’re activists, so we’re not just gonna support each other as important as that work is, we’re gonna start taking some actions. I don’t know if it’s gonna be calls or letter writing or emails or what we’re gonna do. We don’t know yet, but. It’s, it’s important to not only support each other, but also take action. Well, we’ve got booku but loads more time. Here’s the rest of Prudence in our Political Environment with Gene Diagi and Amy Sample Ward. Let’s go a little more uh focused to our colleagues who do uh foreign aid, uh, foreign development, uh, international development work. Uh, affected by the USAID freeze, um, there’s also an OMB freeze. These are in different states of litigation. There are, there are orders issued by judges against these freezes, but the orders don’t seem to be. Uh, being followed by the administration, or we’re not sure. Gene, what, what are you hearing like specifically from the, the uh Community development, you know, foreign, foreign aid work. What was really harsh, right? And so I think I estimated, um, over 50,000 US jobs lost, uh, over 100,000 worldwide jobs lost because of, uh, of some of the, the freezes and cuts. Um, understandably, there, you know, existing contracts that nonprofits had agreed to in the past, um, for which they’ve delivered services and not gotten paid. Yet, um, but it’s through, through grant programs where the funding has stopped. So, um, you know, it’s really, really a harsh time now where organizations are laying off people, they’re cutting off programs, um, and they’re really scrambling to find out how are they going to keep, you know, advancing. Um, their, their mission where they are largely dependent upon federal funding and federal funding is is perhaps, uh, one of the largest sources of funds for the charitable sector, right? Um, it’s not foundation funding, it’s, it’s much, much larger than foundation funding, so it really is important to understand that philanthropy can do a little bit and they should probably do more, but they, they don’t have the capacity to fill the gap that the federal funding has, so, um. Uh, USAID, you know, especially. I think there’s just a lack of knowledge from people to understand well what USAID is. It’s not just giving money away to foreign countries. Um, there are like national interests, security interests, disease prevention, prevention of wars, there’s a lot that Um, reasons why USAID was formed and why we want to have good foreign relations and we, it’s not just, which I’ve heard a lot of folks feel like USAID is like a health, um it’s, you know, right. So yeah, that’s, I mean, that is sort of the, the big problem now and, and when you have somebody um who’s almost acting as an, as an executive in, in Elon Musk again, just to point him out again, announcing the intention to shut down USAID despite the court orders so. Um, you know, the apart from all of the, the funding cutbacks and, and the job losses, are they gonna really kill USAID? Are they gonna kill the Department of Education? like, are, what happens when we lose these things? How easy will they be to replace, um, and, um, what are we gonna do, um, without this? It’s, there’s gonna be a lot of suffering, so it’s organizations are gonna have to figure out, well, in this environment, what are we going to do. Mhm. You know there’s programs being cut. Uh, you know, people abroad sent home or, or there’s no funds to send them home. You know, we’ve, we’ve seen the stories. I think it’s, yeah, I was just gonna add to Jean’s point, um. And I don’t hear you saying this, you know, without any support, but I think As a nonprofit, you know, representative here, when I hear, OK, nonprofits are gonna have to like Try to figure out what do we do in this climate. It’s not a 1 to 1. Many organizations can’t just say we’re gonna fill this hole that that is presented by USAID being forced to, to stop, because we don’t have, to your earlier point, Jean. Contracts in place that say we then get to be the vaccine recipients, or we get to be the arbiters of grain. Like we those organizations don’t have in place the administrivia that allows us to then step in, which is really, just as we were saying that could be used against us as nonprofits if we don’t, you know, have our stuff in order. The the dismantling or even temporary pauses of components of our government is actually in the whole network of contracts and relationships, and, you know, collaborative agreements, and so, I think Nonprofits do, of course, have to think about what do we do now because of this, but we can’t. Maybe fool ourselves into thinking, oh yeah, we’ll just like step in and be them because we can’t replace all all of those agreements or contracts or or relationships. We’re actually thinking more about what do we do with the fallout because of this, and not how do we become the replacement of this, you know. Just to like maybe make it sound worse, I guess, is my point, but. Hey, when you mentioned grain too, um, Amy, I was thinking about the US farmers that are losing, um. I think 10s, maybe even hundreds of millions of dollars of of um purchases from the US government to feed other countries or to deliver that food out that will hurt our agricultural economy here as well. So, you know, even for the administration, um. You know, it’s supporters who, who were met many from rural areas and farming communities are, you know, getting screwed, maybe not directly but indirectly through these things as well. And, and there just has to be a bigger understanding, uh, which is a domino, right? That means more people in that community needing the support services that other nonprofits were already providing to folks, you know, um. And it’s in, I know it’s so different, but I do keep finding myself coming back to a lot of the hard feelings of 2020 when it’s like, Oh my gosh. Organizations across the sector were already operating at maximum, and like, you know, quote unquote, now more than ever, our missions are needed. And and here we are again at this place where, oh my gosh, it’s How, how do we serve more people? How do we can make sure we still have staff to do that because the need. Continues to have this exponential growth, um, feeling, if not actual, um, you know, number. There’s also a national security dimension to this, that, that we’ve, we’ve promised to deliver whatever type of aid, whether it’s, uh, I mentioned, you know, helping build your democracy in Romania, or whether it’s feeding in the African nations or healthcare, you know, we’ve made these commitments and now we’re just literally just walking away. We can no longer do what we were doing two weeks ago. So you’re on your own, uh, the US has screwed you. So there’s that, there’s just our perception in the world, how we’re perceived in the world, and Uh, who’s gonna fill that void? I think, I think some of our, uh, some of our deepest adversaries like China and, you know, China specifically, particularly because of their wealth and and reach, but there’s also a possibility of some terrorist organizations filling a gap on a, on a small, much smaller scale. Especially when you promised people who were helping you fight terrorism that you would allow them to bring themselves and their families into the country after they, they delivered that help and then now breaching that promise and saying no, you can’t come in here anymore. It’s heinous. It’s, it’s, it’s cruel. Yeah. Alright, we gotta take a, we gotta take a turn, uh, to media. Uh, Amy, you have some thoughts about, uh, you know, when I, when I suggested the topic of major media capitulation, even before the election, the Washington Post refusing to endorse any candidate, uh, the Los Angeles Times, same, USA Today, same. And then since the election, um, CNN settling a very questionable lawsuit for $10 billion. Uh, based on what, uh, what, what words, uh, George Stephanopoulos used, um, and it looking potentially like CBS may settle something also very, very questionable about the way they edited a teaser. Yeah, versus the fuller interview if you watch the show, I mean, you know, commercials are made to be short and and video is edited for commercial for short purposes and but the likelihood that CBS may settle that. Uh, so I, I hear, Major media are already part of the corporate industrial complex and so. Well, I would love for them to do better and be better. Am I surprised? No. What I feel is a really important Um, Happening that we should care about even more so than like those completely disappointing, but maybe anticipated, you know, choices, um. When other journalists have not stood with the AP and the AP has been blocked from briefings, that is the backbone of getting reliable direct information from our federal government out to people, right? Um. And all of that because the AP said the established name of this waterway. Yes, the Gulf of Gulf of America, so they were, they were banned from a White House event. This is why I believe what you’re getting to in the media, in the nonprofit community, we all have to support all of our sectors, all of our missions, all of our work, so that when it’s not a race, right? There’s not one. There’s not one trophy. So, if we do not stand together as nonprofits or as journalists, you know, we all will lose. It, I mean, I think Gan made this point earlier, right? Like nonprofits benefit everyone. Good journalism benefits everyone. We, we need. We need sunlight on that information, and we need it to be, this is directly what was said, right? Which is um what the AP is providing and is especially providing news, information, access to under-resourced communities where they do not have their own journalists, they do not have their own media bodies, and so they are just receiving literally that AP wire and reporting what’s happening. Um, and so if we let that crumble, again, just as, as other nonprofits, if we start saying, OK, well, I don’t know what a good. Example would be here, but like I know in a lot of especially smaller or distributed kind of rural communities, United Ways are often the organizations who are the only ones with the capacity to do kind of data aggregation on any regular schedule, right? and say this is the state of social services in our tri-county area for the, you know, and then so many nonprofits don’t have the capacity to do their own. Field research, and so they write grant applications using the United Way’s data. It’s, it’s very similar to in my mind, I think. And if we Don’t stay standing together, we all will lose. Um, and so I think it’s just really, um, a beacon to me right now of that, OK, well I don’t support that, that can, that is not. Giving me any good signs about the state of Journalism or or reporting and information uh in our system, as nonprofits, we cannot replicate that. If, if, if we are not gonna stay together, like all of the pieces, all of the components um can’t, can’t be successful, you know. We can also be sources of information, reliable data to the extent that we can, even if it’s within our own local community, at least we can, we, we can be reliable, we can footnote, we can provide information about it may and it may just be about our work, but we can be we can be reliable sources and, and of course there are some nonprofit, uh, journalism outlets, but you know, that’s a very small percentage of the. 1.5 million or 1 to 1.8 million depending whether you count foundations or not, nonprofits in the US. So, But each of us can be scrupulous about our own, our own data reporting. Mhm. Yeah, I think it’s so important now as well because we don’t all just collect news from our major, major media sources, right? Um, a lot of us relied on Twitter before, for example, um, a lot of us relied on just television shows, um, like the Daily, um, so it’s, it’s about understanding how things that we thought. We’re gonna be more transparent and put more sun like like Twitter led to the Arab Spring or helped, you know, facilitate the Arab Spring that has rapidly changed, right? Twitter is completely different now, um, and looking for, um, supporting those. News media, social media that are more aligned with how we think in terms of being fair and I, I should just sort of also say that the nonprofit sector is as diverse as the for-profit sector and that the federalist society is the nonprofit sector right part so um whether we just say the nonprofit sector as a whole needs to do something we are divided in our sector as well as to what we believe. Um, is fair and what we believe is true, um, but I do think there’s just more commonalities than partisan big corporation and billionaires tell us, um, what our commonalities are. I think we have much more in common with what we want, um, but the media that’s being controlled by the, the industrial complex is telling us something different. Mhm. Amy, you want to leave us with uh with your final thoughts for a minute or two and then we’ll uh I’ll turn to Gene and uh we’ll close. I think my only final thoughts from our conversation today are 12 things. It is very hard, so, you know, if you haven’t had a good cry yet today, this is your moment, like, I see you. It’s really fucking hard. And you’re not alone, right? Like there, not that you N0 would answer all of your questions, but there are so many intermediary organizations, whether that’s a state nonprofit association, um, you know, organizations like N10 that are on a specific topic like technology, but there’s so many resourcing organizations. That exist. To enable you to not figure all this out by yourself. And don’t fall into the trap that I think is, is very clearly laid for all of us to think we are in it alone because then we’re not resourced, we’re not supported, we don’t have a lot of faith in ourselves, right? And then we don’t maybe grow some power. So don’t fall into that trap. Don’t think that you are alone. Find whatever resourcing organization or, you know, collaborative or coalition or whatever you want. But don’t try to have all the answers yourself because like we’re all broken humans that definitely don’t know what all the answers are. So know that it is super hard, but you’re not alone, and we’ll figure it out. Tony will answer your questions. Um, and Tony is one of those resourcing, um, people or hubs, but that’s that’s, I think, all I can say to wrap it up. All right, well, Gene, before we turn to you, uh, I, I already know what I’m gonna say on Tony’s take two for this show, which is gonna be uh uh an infomercial for the nascent nonprofit activist group that, uh, you are, you are, you both joined us for the first meeting, uh, we’ve only had one other meeting since and uh if folks want to join us there, they will have by now already heard my, uh, My explanation of what we’re doing and how to join us on uh Tony’s Take two. So that, that’s my parting and, and you are not alone and there is, uh, I can recommend a group because I’m co-hosting it that uh will prove to you that we’re in this together. Jane I, I echo everything both of you have said about collaboration. Now is the time to join those who have similar values, um, who value your mission, um, talk to your funders, uh, as well, um, get them aligned with what the stories are, uh, of, of what. Problems you may be going through and what solutions you might have to to suggest um keep your boards engaged, keep your staff and beneficiaries engaged so you you’re acting together and be really informed um as as you go through this. This is a period. Um, and things are constantly changing, so just sort of to to know your adaptability, um, value that and make sure that you are allocating risk as well as your resources. So when you’re, when you have talk about risk tolerances, you’ve got to decide where you’re gonna sort of be more risk tolerant and where you’re going to be more risk averse and on the simple compliance stuff, be risk averse, like make sure you’re compliant. Gene Takagi, you, you want legal assistance, legal advice. A legal resource, uh, in our, in our time. Follow nonprofitlawblog.com. You’ll find Gene at GTech. Amy Sample Ward, you’ll find them on Blue Sky as Amy Sample Ward. Thank you very much, Gene. Thank you very much, Amy. Thanks, Tony. Thank you, Tony. Thank you, Amy. Bye. Bye. Next week, Julia Campbell returns for a social media chat. If you missed any part of this week’s show. I do beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. DonorBox, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. I love that alliteration. I knew it. I knew you were gonna come. I thought maybe you would say, no, he’s not gonna do it again this week. No, I knew it. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.