All posts by Nonprofit Radio

Nonprofit Radio for March 24, 2025: Join Us At #25NTC & Great Value In Sustainable Giving

Amy Sample WardJoin Us At #25NTC

The 2025 Nonprofit Technology Conference is next month in Baltimore. Nonprofit Radio will be there. You still have time to join in-person or virtual. NTEN CEO, and our technology contributor, Amy Sample Ward, reveals all the learning and fun you can expect.

 

Dave Raley: Great Value In Sustainable Giving

Dave Raley is the author of the book, “The Rise of Sustainable Giving.” Our subscription economy has spawned a change in donor preferences and great growth in recurring donations. Dave shares his expertise on incentives; creating a thriving sustainer program; naming; converting donors to sustainers; what the future looks like; and more. He’s the founder of Imago Consulting.

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Notice. I expertly wished you happy Saint Patrick’s Day last week when it was Saint Patrick’s Day, so prompt, so timely, right there, so no need to apologize this week for wishing you happy Saint Patrick’s Day week, a week late. We’re right on time here on nonprofit Radio. And I’m glad you’re with us. I’d get slapped with a diagnosis of cataphagia. If I had to repeat the words, you missed this week’s show. Pretty sad when the, the bar is just set at. Being on time with a happiness wish. That’s, that’s, that’s a sad state. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, to introduce this week’s show. Hey Tony, this week it’s join us at 25 NTC. The 2025 nonprofit technology conference is next month in Baltimore. Non-profit radio will be there. You still have time to join in person or virtual. N10 CEO and our technology contributor, Amy Stammple Ward reveals all the learning and fun you can expect. Then Great value in sustainable giving. Dave Raley is the author of the book The Rise of Sustainable Giving. Our subscription economy has spawned a change in donor preferences and great growth in recurring donations. Dave shares his expertise on incentives, creating a thriving sustainer program, naming, converting donors to sustainers, what the future looks like, and more. He’s the founder of Imago Consulting. On Tony’s take 2. Tales from the gym. If they can do it, we all can. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. Here is. Join us at 25 NTC. I’m ready to record with Amy Sample Ward. They are the CEO of N10. Uh, they’re also, of course, our nonprofit radio technology contributor, but today it’s the CEO of N10 role that we are here to talk about because we’re talking about 25 NTC, the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference. It is coming up April 16, 1718 in Baltimore, Maryland. Let’s talk 25. Amy, can’t wait to hugs, hugs. Uh, and, you know, I, I know that most of your time at the NTC you’re recording for nonprofit radio, but what’s nice about it is you’re not in like a recording studio. And so I can always walk by and just listen to who. You’re talking to and um I always see other people standing there listening, um, or taking photos, you know. Yeah, I love, I love the visibility. Yes, we’re, we’re gonna be, we’re in the hub in the commons, which is where all the meals are, all the all the uh keynote sessions, all the general sessions are right there, everything. What else? What else? The receptions, receptions, yes. Uh, so I, I feel like, you know, we’re just, by the time this is airing, we’re just gonna be 3 weeks out. So we probably should focus on the online. Version of uh you know, people register for the in-person conference. Even in person, like they will walk up on day 10, you get walk-ups every year. Oh, all right. Well, all right, so then let’s keep that open. All right, yeah, you you can still register to join us in Baltimore. Of course there is an online only virtual side of the conference that you can also register for and never leave your home or your office or wherever you are. That’s right. There’s, there’s a version for uh each in person and online, and if you need to switch, you can go, this is all on the website, there’s a little spot for switching from virtual to in-person and vice versa. And if you register for in person and end up not coming or you came and you felt like there was too many sessions to choose from, or you could only come for 1.5 days of the, of the 3, you have access to all of the online content, just like somebody who registered for only online. It’s all So if you register for Baltimore, you’re basically registering for both, essentially, because you can access all content. Right, for next, for the following 3 months, I think you can get access to all the, all the, uh, virtual sessions because there are a number of virtual only sessions, but as, as you just said, OK, you get access to both really if you, if you, OK, so all right, so let’s keep up the possibility then. so, you know, where should we show up if we’re, uh, if we’re walking in. Uh, of course, all the info is at.org naturally. But you know, just where, where are we in Baltimore? Where are we going? We’re at the Baltimore Convention Center right by the harbor, and I don’t believe that there’s another event happening in the convention center, um, but at least the area we’re in is very clearly just us. You can walk right through the sky bridge from the Hilton or walk from the Sheraton. They’re connected to the building, um, and Of course, as always, there are lots of other activities that happen that aren’t in the convention center, but all the sessions, all of the main conference stuff will all be in the convention center and We’re trying something that we’ve never done before, um, but because of the physical proximity to the stadium, we, with thanks to the financial support of three of our sponsors, have bought out two sections in the stadium for attendees that want to, to all go over to the Baltimore Orioles game together, uh, Wednesday evening. So, like, knock on wood for Memorable weather, whatever. I don’t want to just say good because it seems like it’d be good, you know, jinx, but um and this is free. This is free. Yeah, you got sponsors covering hundreds of tickets for, yeah, yeah, that’s outstanding. Baltimore Orioles game. OK, that’s that’s the football team. Noball. Oh they play baseball? All right. Well, baseball, no, that’s good. Baball is good. That’s right. That’s right. OK. um. Oh, I thought you were joking, but you were being serious. No, I was joking. OK, OK, good. OK, good. I was like, oh gosh. Yeah, so it’ll it’ll be fun and I think that. Somebody from our group, I mean, it doesn’t need to be me. So maybe, maybe we can convince the sponsors to do it. Even goes down on the field and says, Hey, everybody from the conference is here, and we all get to wave. So cool. I thought you were gonna say you’re gonna sing the anthem. Oh my gosh, no, they would pay me not to do it. All right. Um, so let’s remind folks that NTC. The nonprofit technology conference is not only for technologists. We, we say this year after year, but we have new listeners each year and maybe somebody didn’t listen to last year’s NTC TS TS show. Let let’s make this very, very clear. It’s not only for technologists. Well, it’s, it’s such a complicated thing because on one hand, I would say it’s 2025. We are all using technology to do our job. And so in some ways, we’re all technologists, but This is not a conference that was founded 25 years ago or still today operated with the assumption that everyone that is making decisions about technology or using technology or wants to know, like the latest developments of technology, see themselves as The IT director or or has technology in their job title, right? And so the topics, I mean, there’s, I think 162 with the latest count or whatever in the spreadsheet, you know, of of sessions, but there’s so many opportunities in sessions and out to talk about all the other implications beyond any technology system, you know, it’s not necessarily. Just about which CRM which database are you using? It’s why, why do you even have that data in your database? Where did it come from? Do you know when you could get rid of it? Do you have a retention policy? You know, it’s all these other pieces that impact, yes, our technology systems but also impact our work and how we can do that work and technology is just in in the mix of it all. There are multiple tracks that that are not that involve technology naturally that overlap but fundraising, there’s a fundraising track, there’s a diversity, equity accessibility track, um, there’s a leadership track, you know, there’s, so there’s lots of different subjects across these 160 some uh sessions, and some of them will be. Uh, I’ll be talking to the speakers from some of them, a subset of them, for future episodes of nonprofit radio. Of course, that’s what I’ll, will be on the hub, uh, will be in the hub at the Commons recording. Um. I love the, you know, if you do go, if you go in person, I had to, you know, I’m looking at the lunch, it’s incredible. We had to, I think we talk about the food every year, but I got, I got, I’m reading now. I’m reading from the lunch description for each of the three days, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. All meals at the NTC. Include a range of options for gluten free, vegan, vegetarian, low carb, low salt and low sugar dietary needs. Menus avoid or label the inclusion of peanuts, tree nuts, shellfish, eggs, cow’s milk, soybeans, sesame and wheat. Halal, kosher and celiac meals are available on request, and if you need a space away from the cacophony, look for signs for the quiet tables. It’s such a thoughtful damn conference. I mean, this is just around the food, but that’s a microcosm of the thoughtfulness around NTC. Well this is a quite a core value of, of NTC and N10. Tell us how you, you think about what people need. At a conference and and how you execute on that. Well, maybe I could start with the food that feels um especially relevant, what you don’t know, or externally doesn’t know. Um, we have, um, I will say an animal rights activist organization, uh, that you can anticipate who they are in the community, glad they’re in the community, glad they come to the conference, learn from sessions, you know, presented sessions, etc. Who Has, um, for a number of years, tried a few different campaign strategies to have the conference be entirely vegan. I am vegan. I have been since I was still a teenager, you know, I I don’t disagree necessarily, but as an insight, and I’m glad that there are conferences that are able to be all vegan, but our community has Members in it who have allergies that make uh all vegan, you know, diet at a conference where it’s just all set out on the table, not something they could eat at. Um, and we have folks with disabilities who, even if they don’t have an allergy, they have food related needs that allow them to be comfortable and manage their day without having to go back to their hotel room, right, to eat, um. There are a lot of different things that come across someone’s decision making mind when they’re standing at the beginning of that like buffet table, right? And some of them are dietary, medical, health related, some of them are emotional, some of them are social, right? Like, what if you don’t recognize any food on that table? None of this food is from a, a shared culture that you have. We have people from 16 different countries coming to the conference, right? You might not be allergic to any of them, but if you don’t know what any of them are, and you’re trying to have professional conversations and you’re really trying to get along with this person that you just met in a session, right? And maybe you wanna work for them, and now you’re faced with a bunch of food that you don’t know what it is. That’s very difficult, right? And so we think about Accessibility in a lot of different ways at the conference, and what are the pieces that we can put in place that make it so people are comfortable, they have some things that they can recognize and anticipate throughout the day. It’s why we have coffee and tea at all different hours because Again, culturally or from the time zone that you’re in, right? You, this might be when you want coffee. Uh, so we really wanna think about how do folks move through this space without having To use up all of their decision making or all of their thinking for the day on where do I need to go? Is there gonna be food there? Can I get more water? What do I need to do? Like, we want all of that to be in place so that people are using up their brains saying, wow, what should I think about AI? Oh, wow, what should I learn about this new data standard? What, right? We want that to be where people can spend their thinking and not on Am I gonna be able to eat here, you know? It’s all very thoughtfully done. You, you, you, you call it accessibility and ease, uh, and I, I just caption it as thoughtful, thoughtful. A lot of thought goes into, uh, hosting over 2000 people, right? How many, how many do you think we’ll have. Well, I mean, unfortunately, we have in person, yeah, I mean, unfortunately, it’s so similar to 2020 in which, um, that was the year that it was meant to be in Baltimore previously. Um and with the start, uh, it was scheduled for March 23rd through 25th, 2020. So that was right when We were the first event that was canceled with the governor’s, you know, declaration that events are. I remember, I remember tearful. Yeah, because we made the choice to cancel before the governor, before any governor had stopped events, and so we had to make the choice to cancel, knowing that it would mean we’d close the organization because we’d have to pay all the fines. And thankfully, our lawyer found that the cancellation to the convention center, uh, has to be in writing, and we, we never bothered to tell them we weren’t coming because that felt self-evident, and we had spent a week telling the community and the governor said, hey, there’s no events, and we’re like, what we’re, we don’t have to pay. I mean we still have to pay some, but We didn’t have to close as an organization, right, and pay every dollar we had, um, but now with all of these just erratic and harmful changes that the administration is unleashing basically every day. We’re having, you know, we’re hearing from folks asking for a scholarship. They just lost 75% of their funding because of what’s happened, you know, they still want to come to the conference. They, they know that that’s where they can connect with people and get resources and, and learn. But they are firing staff, they, they have no funds. So we’re giving scholarships out to, you know, anybody who’s writing to us um in those situations, and we have continued the regular rate for anyone within about 100 miles of Baltimore that is maybe, you know, a a a local in that way to try and keep um it accessible. To folks who are really having those impacts. Um, so we’ve seen a lot of, not a lot, but a number of folks in February need to move to virtual because they Their organization no longer has funding, you know, um, which is Difficult and just outrageous that we’re in this place where organizations, you know, are somehow the target of I don’t know. I, I, I don’t even know how to frame what the situation is. Yeah, we talked about that. Yeah, so that is gonna impact how many folks are there. I mean, I’m sure they’ll still be, um, you know, 2000. Regis registrants, it’s just by the time we get to April, what will be the mix of a couple 100 online, you know, people in person, who, who, who can still physically come, you know? Um, and unfortunately, we’re having folks from a few of the non-US countries say, hey, I’ve been advised not to come to the US. So I’m not going to travel there anymore, and I’ll just be a virtual attendee. Which is also infuriating because this is a global community and I Don’t like that we would have, I mean, we’re just talking about accessibility, right? And, and that all the elements that we try to control so that we can create a, a place where folks really can be together and share their ideas and build power and, and make relationships that are beyond any of these, you know, oh, you work in a different organization. Who cares? We can still share our ideas. We can still figure this out together, right? And To have folks Feel unsafe is is. Not what we want, you know, and obviously not in our control, not in our, not our doing, but it still on a bigger scale to have folks feel unsafe entering the United States. Right. It infuriating. All right, let’s not end on an infuriating note, although, uh the the realism is uh realism and not ignoring. I feel like, I feel like too many. Too many of our community’s content creators are ignoring the reality that it’s besieging us every single day. Yeah, it is every day. I, I, so, you know, reality is essential. I, we’re living it. So, well, that’s a great pivot. We could end on something uh positive, which is the three keynotes that are coming because Alyssa Richardson. Her work is just on what you’re talking about. How do communities use the technology they have access to social media, etc. to shine a light on what is really happening in their community, to have some access to power through truth and information. Um, she has written books, she’s a professor, she has a, you know, whole lab, um, at UCLA or USC, um, and it’s just really An incredible person, so she’s One of the keynotes, just as you were just saying, why are we not talking about this, um, and Doctor Ashley Xu, who is the author of Against Techno Abelism and you know, kind of trying to counter this idea that technology is here to cure us and make us perfect because we don’t need to, you know, what what if we get rid of disabilities, which is such a Elitist ablest idea like this disabilities are in so many people in so many different ways, and that’s not that something’s wrong with them, you know, um, technology isn’t some cure or solution or path to perfection, right? That’s no, no, no, that’s so antithetical to, to what, at least in the community we’re talking about with technology. So I’m excited for her talk, um. But we also have Michael Running Wolf, who’s worked on indigenous language projects through AI. So yes, it’s probably unavoidable to talk about AI, but can we talk about it rooted in absolutely using it in ways that help us as the users, as communities who didn’t get to necessarily have access. To build open AI or anything else, right? So what, what do we, what, what can we learn um from Michael’s projects really rooting those technologies in um communities most impacted. All right, 3 outstanding. Keynote speakers, you’ll enjoy one each morning. Right after the breakfast. Yeah, or you can even, you know, if you’re a slow eater like me, save your breakfast and eat it while they’re talking, yeah, and savor your breakfast because it’s all in the same place. It’s all ins and of course the virtual attendees are are part of that part of the the keynotes as well, and they’ll be having breakfast, you know, on their own, just your camera will be off while you’re eating your Cheerios. Yeah, exactly. All right. Uh, so April 16 to 18, uh, Baltimore Convention Center, all the info is at n10.org. It’s right up the top of the website. You can’t possibly miss it. Join us in person, come see, come see nonprofit Radio at the Commons in the hub. We’ll have our studio set up or join uh 25 NTC virtually, but join. It’s, it’s worth it. It’s, it’s, it’s a smart savvy conference. That’s why this is the. 11th NTC that I’m bringing nonprofit radio to because the speakers are savvy and smart and they benefit all of us and as Amy, as Amy said, we all work with technology in our jobs and so the nonprofit technology conference is for you. Be with us. Thank you, Amy. Yeah, see you there. I’ll see you in a couple of weeks. Sounds great. All right, bye. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s DonorBox, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you, a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges. Helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs. Helping you, help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now it’s time for. Great value in sustainable giving. It’s a pleasure to welcome Dave Raley to nonprofit Radio. He’s the founder of Imago Consulting, an advisory firm that helps organizations create growth through innovation. He’s the author of the book The Rise of Sustainable Giving How the Subscription Economy Is Transforming Recurring Giving and what nonprofits can do to benefit. That’s what brings him to the show. You’ll find the book at sustainablegiving.org. You’ll find Dave Raley on LinkedIn. Dave, welcome to nonprofit Radio. So good to be here, Tony, and good to actually be, as we were saying offline on the other side of the mic. I’ve appreciated listening to the show and glad to be on it. Thank you very much. Thanks for being a listener. Congratulations on the brand new book. Oh, thank you, thank you, it’s been uh. Quite the journey, 3 years, um, 438 hours of writing enumerate the stats in the book. I, I have a friend who, um, because I I I’ve worked a lot with uh charities through the sort of the marketing agency space, Tony, and so I had a friend comment like, Dave, you don’t need to track your time. You do know that, right? And I thought, I don’t know, I just like tracking things, so I don’t want to track my steps every day, but I will track the number of hours I poured into this. This, uh, this, uh, passion project for sure. So as you were writing over those 4, you were you were keeping a log. I was keeping a log and thinking I don’t know if this thing’s ever going to. To be done candidly, I think the 1st 3 years, probably the 1st 2 years were like, OK, 1 ft in front of the other, and, uh, such a, such a huge effort, um, but I’m really proud of the book, uh, the early reception, and just I’m really hopeful that it makes a significant difference in our sector. It has that potential, absolutely. Um, if I may, I’d like to read from, uh, the foreword to, to sort of frame us a little bit, uh, your, your forward is by Gabe Cooper, CEO of Virtuous who’s been a guest on uh nonprofit radio also. The reality is that nonprofits are fundraising in a world that no longer exists. The total number of donors giving to nonprofits has consistently decreased over the past decade. Donors are more distracted than ever, and they receive a constant stream of ads and personalized messages from their favorite brands. Most donors still desire to make an impact in the world, but it’s become infinitely harder for nonprofits to break through the noise. That’s, uh, that’s as far as I got on the book. That’s page uh XXII. I stopped. I didn’t even to the pages. That was great. I didn’t even get into the Arabic numbers, so I, I stopped at XXII. Um, now, so. Uh, it’s getting hard to get through the noise. We’re, we’re fundraising in old methods. That was a little frame up. Why don’t you please give us, uh, your take on, on Gabe’s wisdom there. Yeah, you know, I, one of the meta sort of topics that I’m really passionate about is what does sustainable innovation look like? Uh, the book is certainly about sustainable giving and recurring giving in light of how, um, shifts have changed, and we’ll talk about that shortly, but You know, to respond to the way Gabe positioned that, number one, we are absolutely in the middle of a generosity crisis, um, and, uh, that is in North America, that the number of Americans that are giving to charity today is less than, uh, last year and is less than the year prior. Now, as those of us in this industry know, often the amount of dollars that are being given to to philanthropy, um, by individuals is increasing, but that’s thanks to largely mega, uh, you know, billionaire donors, which go for it. I would love them taking their, their philanthropic giving as well, but I do think there’s something about how do we teach the next generation generosity and what does that look like? Um, but to Gabe’s point about models, um, one of the things I always, uh, say is that it’s really important not to confuse your organization’s mission with your model. So your mission is about what your organization, your cause is, uh, is trying to change in the world. Your model is how you do that, right? Including how do you fund doing that. And so when I think about sustainable innovation, I think every organization, every institution, Is really somewhere on that organizational life cycle curve, you know, that S curve you see in like business books, you know, where it’s like infancy, early growth, mid-growth, slowing plateauing and decline, right? Every organization goes through that, and that’s just kind of a like the, you know, fourth law of thermodynamics for organizational health is that those models do age out. And so for me, um, the reason innovation is so important is because it helps us create new S curves, new models to effectively accomplish the mission that our organizations are called to, so. Innovation is critical, uh, models do shift over time, and one of the models that I’ve seen shift, uh, tremendously over the last decade is what’s been happening in the space of recurring giving, namely for the charities that have historically been left behind, uh, Tony, 3 quarters of charities, um. have historically not been able to really tap into strong, growing, resilient giving, you know, they’re not the local public television or public radio station or museum or, um, you know, 1 to 1 sponsorship type of organization. They’ve done pretty well over the last 100 years, uh, with Rick Gibbing, but it’s really the, the food bank, the rescue mission, the relief and development agency. The, uh, the think tank that hasn’t been able to really build strong growing resilient, recurring giving until really the subscription economy and the rises of subscription economy has essentially led to changes in how we consume. You know, the average American today, Tony, has, uh, more than 12 subscriptions, maybe to their chagrin, right, I know 96% of us I think have more than one. And yeah, I was 9. 9.8%. I have at least one subscription, adults, um, and what’s the number you just cited a number of subscriptions. Oh my gosh. All right. Um, before we get into the sustainable, let’s let’s define the subscription. I mean, Yeah, no, the Amazon Prime and Netflix are ubiquitous, but let’s just, let’s just make sure we’re all starting at the same place. What, what’s your sense of the subscription economy? Yeah, and you know, you, you hit it on the head. I think everyone kind of intuitively knows what it is today. Um, 10 years ago when I first started talking about this in the industry, Tony, I had to explain that, you know, what do you mean? You know, subscription. I was like, well, have you heard of Netflix? Oh yeah, OK, I get it. But today it’s really the rise of recurring ongoing, um, transactions in every area of our life, in our business lives, you know, we’re on Zoom right now. I don’t know about you, but I have to pay for the Zoom subscription. Um, you know, I listened to Spotify this morning while I was writing my latest wave report, the weekly column that I write on innovation, that’s a subscription. I had to change the batteries, by the way, in my Arlo camera, um, uh, some people use Ring. Uh, these, these doorbell cameras. Yes, right, you have a subscription, yeah, you make a point. You have a subscription to your doorbellion to your door. If you would have told me 10 years ago that you’re going to be subscribed to the doorbell company, I would have said, uh, no thanks, that’s not great. And yet I gladly spend, you know, whatever $15 a month to know when an Amazon package gets dropped off. One that that strikes me is that we used to pay. One time you used to buy a subcri you used to buy the product Windows. Windows you used to buy the, the operating system and every couple of years there was a new operating system and you have to spend $200 or $300 to, uh, now and, and other things similar but you now have a subscription to Windows 365. It’s called 365 and, and that’s the way you now access the Windows operating system. I don’t know, just, I don’t know, 78 years ago it wasn’t that way. Yeah, well, and I don’t know about you, but or your listeners, but I went uh kicking and screaming, you know, you’re like, no, I wanna own my software. I wanna own my music. Until you start to realize, oh yeah, how long did it take me to go from Windows, whatever, 95 to it was XP first and then 95. It’s like you would, you would end up with this like grossly out of date software because you’re too, I don’t know they meet you, but I was too cheap to, you know, get the next set of software to the point where it is so that ongoing value proposition, which by the way, is a key lesson for fundraising. Your proposition, yeah, but you have to, you have to like the reason I I give money to Spotify every month is not because I’m renting music from the music company. It’s because there is an ongoing each month I’m receiving novel value, and that is what’s uh helping me continue to stay in that subscription. And so I think software, I now look at it as a gift, right? I started uh started my company. And Mago just uh just under 3 years ago and I was so grateful that I have to spend several $1000 in, you know, in software costs. I knew I could I could subscribe to Adobe Creative Cloud, to Google Workspace, to Zoom, and get a lot of value and spread out that cost, um, but that their ongoing value is so powerful. Share some of the uh stats that you have about sustainable giving, why this is so important for nonprofits. Yeah, there’s, you know, there’s certainly some of the, um, the commonly used stats about the value of sustainable giving, which just to rattle through a few of those, average retention rates, 78 to 86%, that’s versus a multi-year, you know, single gift owner we call them. That typically they’ll retain about 42%, so, you know, almost double or in some cases literally double the the uh the the retention rate, significantly high, higher long term value, 5 to 7 times the long-term value. They’re 6 times more likely to leave an organization in their estate, um, or legacy plan, uh, if they’re a recurring donor. I was just doing a seminar with a Group that does uh recurring or I’m sorry, does legacy giving, Tony, and they, um they just did a study of all of the organizations and all these state gifts they’ve monitored and the number one most predictable factor, um, after an after a donor had been on the file for 10 years, so. The first one was longevity, but the second was frequency. It was the frequency of giving and so recurring givers were the most likely um indicator that they would be a legacy giver. That’s outstanding. What can you shout the company name? Yeah, Canopy Resources, um, for Ministry. They’ve got two different brands. Oh sorry, no, C A N O. OK, OK, but don’t spell it right, the incredible value. And but there are some less known statistics. Neon, the folks over at Neon looked at over 200. They found the average charity from 2019 to 2024 grew recurring 127%. So this is not, um, you know, I’m a big believer in seeing, you know, what changes on the horizon and what waves, you know, are coming. This is, this is an opportunity that’s not something that’s just coming down the line. I’m not here saying, hey, I wrote a book, Tony, in 2 or 3 years, this is going to be a big deal. It’s like, no, no, no, it’s a big deal right now, and it’s been a big deal the last couple of years. But, and this is critical, my, I feel like part of my role in this sector is to help people to connect the dots that it’s a big deal now, but then what do I do about it? And so really the, the third part of the book is ultimately, well, the 2nd and 3 parts of the book are how to take advantage of the subscription economy and then how to build and grow a thriving recurring giving program. Also recurring donors, uh, you make this point, give 25% more than their, their recurring donation commitment. Just, just flush it out a little bit quickly. Yeah, the, you know, and, and I, I’ve had some, as I’ve been speaking about this at conferences, I have had occasional people come up to me and say, yeah, set it and forget it, right? And I’m like, no, that actually it turns out in the subscription world that doesn’t work either. But really your recurring donors are the most generous single gift donors, meaning the average recurring donor um on a file will give in addition to their annual recurring giving another about 25% in single, what we call single gifts, right? So it’s the year-end gift, it’s the emergency relief gift. And so when I work with organizations to map out their cultivation of recurring donors, I’m we’re always looking at what are you doing to give your recurring donors additional gift opportunities, um, how are you messaging that to them because just as much as some organizations might think, well, you know, we should just uh not send any uh additional asks to our recurring donors. No, the opportunity is really to. To cultivate them because they are, they’re the most bought into your cause. So when there is that disaster or that uh crisis situation or that year end, again, those major times of year, those donors are often the most responsive. So what we’re seeing is that That this uh subscription economy that’s ubiquitous as you described. Has led to a change in donor preferences on the charitable side so sort of the, the corporate side has taken this and accelerated it and, and it’s like we said now ubiquitous. People are expecting this on the and, and looking for it even on the, on the charitable side. So it, so it’s a, it’s a shifting donor preferences, would you talk about that in the book. Yeah, and it’s really about um a lot of these trends, um, start on the what I would call the consumer side, right, which is just it’s it’s it’s setting tones. I remember I I started in the industry in the early days of digital fundraising and um I remember when people were were worried about putting their. Credit card in online and I remember when Facebook came out and clients would say, hey, should we do fundraising on Facebook and I would say, no, it’s a good, it’s a good relational platform, you know, it’s a good way to connect with your alumni or whatever, um, because it wasn’t intel several years of in this case Facebook being around and people becoming used to basically their consumer lives and their social media lives intersecting. That’s when then. You know, in this case, I think it was the Haiti earthquake that was the real uh linchpin moment, um, in the late 2000s when Facebook and the Red Cross raised, I think it was $30 million overnight and it just, that changed the landscape. Of people being willing to give related to their social media presence. Well, if it weren’t for several years prior to that of people getting used to using their credit card online and all these other things, it wouldn’t have paved the way for generosity. And so I’m seeing the same thing, the subscription economy is not new. I don’t have to convince people that it exists when I speak now, but I do have to help them understand how that has really laid the groundwork for people’s philanthropic behavior changing. You call in the book subscription philanthropy. Yeah, I don’t know, I don’t know if that’s your phrase. I had I had I’m crediting well, and the funny thing is, you know, and I don’t want people and I talk about subscription giving too. I want to be careful on the reason I didn’t use that in the title of the book, by the way, was I don’t want people to think I’m trying to, we’re trying to make philanthropy and generosity a consumeristic act. Now there is a value proposition and there’s a value exchange, and sometimes, by the way, there’s goods and services that even exchange hands. If I watch your public, you know, television station or I visit. The museum or I get the, you know, the free book resource, there could actually be some form of sort of good or service that exchanged, but what I’m trying to point out with subscription philanthropy is that really, um, there are some lessons we can learn from those subscription worlds and we can apply them to today. I remember when the streamlined purchasing uh um pages, I’m thinking of, you know, Amazon, one click buy, when, when those were emerging, they were influencing. Well, they were influencing what donors expected from an online transaction, and that influenced what nonprofits had to. Had to create that we had to make a, you know, more seamless online not a purchase but an online giving process because people expected that from the, from their commercial side. So this is, you know, it, and I think that’s terrific. I think there are lessons that can be translated, they learned from the commercial side to the charitable side, uh, that’s, that’s all to our benefit on the, on the charitable side. Totally agree, totally agree. So let’s talk about, you know, now we have to, you know, I always remind listeners, you know, you got to get the book because there’s only so much we can talk about in an hour. So you got to get the book at um at sustainablegiving.org. Of course, we all, uh, you can also get it through Barnes and Noble and Amazon, etc. um, but you know, give Dave’s landing page some hits because uh. He’s a metrics guy he’s tracking the metrics on the. You’ll you’ll end up with a copy of the book either way, but you may as well make, uh, make the gateway through, uh, sustainablegiving.org. So. Uh, we’re, we’re jumping a little ahead, but I, I do want to talk about some of the incentives. So now, you know, we’ve talked about sustainable philanthropy, how important sustainable giving is, how that’s created a subscription philanthropy, so that’s what I meant, subscription philanthropy model, um, some of the incentives if you wanna, if we wanna move into this. We, we, we don’t feel like we’re doing it well enough, the, uh, the way the Gabe Cooper quote, you know, suggests that we either not doing it, which is really unwise, um, well, you know what, let’s take a step back. Let’s go to, let’s go to the nonprofit that isn’t doing. Uh, isn’t doing sustain or giving. And we’ve already explained why, why it’s important. We’re not, we’re, we’re past the, the motivation step, but what should we think about, you know, like what should we bring, what do we need to bring to our vice president? What, what topics do I need to, as the vice president bring to the CEO or what issues, you know, what help me make the case, I suppose, for the nonprofit that may not be, uh, unwisely, unfortunately, but, uh, doing this type of giving. Well, the first thing I would say is you have a recurring giving program. Whether you call it something or you’ve actually spent any time on it, whether it’s any good. I have not met a nonprofit that does not have donors who have chosen to give on a recurring basis. The question is whether or not you’re taking advantage of that and whether or not you are creating growth. It actually again reminds me of the early days of digital, where I would, I would go and, uh, to a charity and I would say, hey, I think we can really help grow your, you know, your online giving. And they would say, oh, it’s already growing 20% a year. And I would be, and I would say, but how fast could it be growing because the reality is just with adoption, people are going to choose of their own volition. You know, in this, in the case of digital, to give online, in the case of subscription giving to give on a recurring basis. So first thing I would say is you have recurring giving um going on in your organization and so it’s about understanding what is that today and then what could it be in the future. I am a huge believer in the potential and, and really painting the picture for that. So I always like to ask people, you know, how many, how much, how many donors do you have today? How much are they giving on a recurring basis, because Nobody’s starting from zero, and that’s actually the good news. So that’s the first thing I would do, um, uh, certainly give them a copy of the book, that’s apparently, uh, work, uh, the book’s only been out, Tony, but, uh, just for a month as we record this, but it’s been really powerful when you have that kind of like I could try to convince you of something or I could let this third party podcast episode or you know or actual book, um, uh, you know, do some convincing for me, um, but. I think it’s really just recognizing that you do have a recurring giving program. The question is, are you going to do anything about it? And, um, and once you know kind of where you are today, that’s where you can start to um forecast for lack of a better term, like what would it look like to grow this program, and, you know, what, how might that enable our our mission that our organization is trying to accomplish? You’re, you’re thinking, you know, as I was reading. Made me sort of reimagine the work that I do, uh, it’s sort of a different framework. My, my work is planned giving fundraising consulting. You, you listen to the show, so you probably know that, um. You know, and there are, uh, clients that have donors. I’m thinking about a handful of people, but they, they’re doing their recurring giving, they’re just doing it every year. They’re putting $1500 or $20,000 into, you know, on the planiving side into a charitable gift annuity. So you, you got me thinking, you know, well, all right, so. In, in, in my practice, I’m seeing this. I, I don’t think that is recurring giving. I, you know, but what, what value proposition we’re gonna get, you know, we’ll get formally to the, to the value proposition. We’ve, we’ve teased it like 4 times now. We will get to it. I, I promise our listeners, um. You know, but what am I offering these folks, you know, so some of them, uh, have come to expect maybe a comp to the annual gala at which is like a $500 a person ticket. So there’s $1000 you know, that, you know, I, I hesitate to be, uh, too, too, um, lofty in my own like self-aggrandizement, but I meet with them often, you know, there’s that, um, I’ve introduced them to the CEO. And in one case I’m thinking of uh an attorney who I introduced to the chief legal officer at a client. So they’re, so they’re getting it just got me thinking, thinking differently about my work. Yeah, uh, uh, uh, you just gave me a little different framework to think about, um, which was very kind of, uh, opening to me. So thank you. Oh, you’re welcome. Well we’re seeing it in planned, which, you know, you would think, well, planned giving, like that’s the opposite of recurring recurring giving is transactional. No, well, this is what we’re here to learn that sustainable sus sustainer giving is not transactional, that’s not what you want, but the, the, the stereotype is, well, planned giving is totally relational and, and this recurring giving is totally transactional. All right, so we’re here to break that down for you’re wrong about the sustain the sustainer giving. And there is overlap between the two. it was kind of a broadening thing as I was reading the book. Well, and even there’s a reason that you don’t see in the book, uh, save for maybe one or two spots. Um, I don’t refer to it as monthly giving. I refer to it as recurring giving. I didn’t call it I did I make a mistake? No, no, no, but I’m, I’m actually, it, it reinforces the point that you’re making, which is, is planned is at least certain parts of planned giving actually a form of recurring giving. You know, I go back in the, in the early part of the book, the kind of the ancient history studying humanity and Plato and you know, different people around philanthropy and the earliest form of recurring giving was the ancient Jewish people and the practice of what they called first fruits, you know, it’s like if you’re a If you’re a farmer or you’re a shepherd, then you would take the 1st 10% of your crop or your, you know, your livestock, and then you would bring it to the temple, which was the local central, you know, essentially authority for the Jewish people, and they would, um, They would then as a part of that process, they would then feed the, the poor and the widows and, and care for, care for those in need in their society and so that was a form of recurring giving. Now did it happen every month on the 1st and 15th? No, it happened every season, turns out because when you’re an agricultural economy. Uh, that’s when that happens, but this idea of this pattern of, of giving, and I do think we’re seeing lots of areas of fundraising, including plan giving, including what I would call major gifts, you know, middle or major gifts that are seeing their own influences, um, in recurring giving, you know, I had one client, uh, a couple of months ago, we ran a campaign. For new, you know, recurring donors to the organization, uh, and they had one donor sign up for $5000 a month, and I said on their credit card, and they said, yep, somebody’s getting a lot of miles, right? Um, but that donor, that’s the, that was the comfortable giving level for them versus another donor that might be $50 a month or or $20 a month, right? And so I do think we’re seeing this form of philanthropy intersect other, you know, uh, areas of philanthropy as well, and it’s all kind of, um, I think working together to increase generosity. I agree, yup, absolutely. We are seeing it. OK, thank you. Now, let’s, let’s talk about some of the incentives uh uh uh that uh you can use to induce folks. To, uh, into sustainable recurring giving, tick off, tick off some of your your favorites from the book. Yeah, you know, and I think with incentives, especially when I write about those in light of the subscription economy, people think again the more the consumer side, and there are certainly incentives that are literal, you know, it’s what we would call a backend premium, you know, like. Uh, you know, I donate and I get a copy of the latest book or I get a, you know, a chotchke of some form, um, and those are a form of incentive, um, really incentives are about helping move the donor to that point of decision, um. So some other incentives that I like though, um, so, uh, classic fundraising, but an absolutely powerful incentive is a match or challenge grant for recurring giving. So not just a sort of we have an overall match, but no, we have a donor that has agreed to match every first gift or the first few months of every, every new recurring donor that signs up. It’s a win from a middle and major donor perspective because you can actually uh use that to say, hey, you can help us multiply giving. Um, but then it’s also a very motivational thing for donors. Um, I’m a big fan of, um, uh, multipliers depending on the organization. So like if some organizations do a lot of like gifts in kind or volunteer service where you can say every gift, uh, every dollar you send results in $30 or $10 worth of impact because of the donated goods we have or the, you know, the volunteer force that we operate, so multiplier. Um, I would call deadlines and goals candidly a form of incentive, you know, um, so I’m a big believer in saying, hey, by this date, because of this very specific need and this very specific reason, we’re looking for, you know, 150, uh, you know, monthly partners to help accomplish this, you know, this vision. Um, and there’s other, there’s others, but those are some of my favorites, um. Could you do the bounce back for me? Explain, explain the bounce back is a device, um, and I, you know, my first job was in direct mail, so it’s it’s a direct mail specific term, but, um, is really a device that you send that then the donor’s gonna return. So I, we used to do this um with some of the shelters we would work with, we would do a Thanksgiving place map. And we would allow, um, donors, we would send the placemats to donors and we would say we were going to use these when we serve the Thanksgiving meals, the week of Thanksgiving. Would you consider writing a note of encouragement to somebody who’s down, you know, um, and that’s like a really beautiful bounce back device because it’s like, yes, I would love to do that, um, for, for those listening that are familiar with the concept of child sponsorship, you know, letter writing is actually a form of a bounce back like I’m gonna write a letter to. To, you know, the, the person that I’m sponsoring, um, so it’s just some sort of involvement device, um, that engages the donor. It’s time for Tony’s Take 2. Thank you, Kate. Another tale from the gym. Uh, an uplifting one, not, not a whiny one like Mrs. Blood and Soil last week. Uplifting There’s a man who comes to the gym. I see him 3 times a week, probably. He comes in in a walker, and he needs help. He has a friend who comes with him each time the friend holds the door. They park the walker alongside the wall, and then the friend helps him over to the bike, stationary bike, and this guy does the stationary bike. He’s certainly 80 plus, uh, could, um, could be mid to at least even could be mid 80s, maybe even a little higher. But there he is Several times a week. Coming in his walker, but he makes the trip and he does the stationary bike for, I don’t know, a long time, you know, I’m not cocking the guy, but he doesn’t just do it for 5 minutes. And then there’s a woman who comes in, not as often as the man in the walker. Uh, she works on the treadmill. And she has supplemental oxygen. She has a cannula. In her nose, and she has a small oxygen bottle in a backpack. And she does the treadmill, and not also not for a short time. We’re not talking 5 minutes. So, Of course I don’t know these people because, uh, I, as we know, I keep to myself in the gym, just try to listen to others and do my business and, and depart. But if the man with the walker who needs help getting from the, from the where he leaves his walker over to the bike, and the woman with the supplemental oxygen, if they can be working out. We all can. They inspire me. They make me realize there’s no excuse when I don’t, you know, sometimes some mornings uh don’t really feel like doing it. I think of, uh, I think of these folks. So if they can do it, we all can. And that is Tony’s take too. OK. I think you should go talk to these people. I mean, I’m not a gym person, so I don’t know like the gym etiquette, but I mean if they don’t have like headphones on, I think you should go like introduce yourself, go talk to these people, see what their story is. You do, right? I don’t know. Uh, neither one of them owns uh headsets, I don’t think. They don’t, no, they’re not wearing AirPods or headsets or anything. I don’t know, you know, I like, I like to keep to myself in the gym, you know, because, especially the man, the man on the uh on the um on the bike, he does a lot of talking on the bike. Um, you know, it’s the chatty, it’s the chattiness I’m trying to avoid. I don’t know. Uncle Tony, you’re a little chatty yourself where you wanna be. Uh, when I want to be, yeah, I turn on the charm. I turned the charm on, but, uh, in the gym, I just, I turn it off, I keep to myself, you know, I’m still the New Yorker. I, it wasn’t, I lived in New York 15 years. I didn’t grow up there. I grew up in New Jersey, but close to New York City, you know, and these folks are, it’s, it’s North Carolina, small town. Different sensibilities, uh, and I’m making, uh, unfair rationalizations, uh, and, and, uh, stereotypes and rationalizations, but these things are important, stereotypes and rationalizations. Right. OK. Well for now. For now, you’d leave it. OK, thank you for now. We’ve got uu but loads more time. Here’s the rest of Great Value and Sustainable Giving with Dave Riley. Do you know the movie about Schmidt with Jack Nicholson? Well, I mean I know it, but I don’t know. He has a pen pal that he’s he’s he writes to this as his life is a spiral down after his wife dies, um, he writes to uh I think it’s, I’m pretty sure it’s. Yeah, so you hear him. Like probably 3 or 4 times in the movie, he’s, you hear a voiceover of him writing to uh to explain how his first world problems are uh spiraling. Well, there is, by the way, a principle in that story, and that is the power of human connection. Um, in fact, the first, um, uh, shelter that I ever worked with on a recurring giving program was called Union Rescue Mission in Los Angeles. I write about them in the book. And the first program I ever worked on, Tony was what they call a meal a day program. So it was this idea of if you give, it costs about, um, at that time with goods and service uh donated goods, it was like $1. $20 or something like that, a meal. Um, and so if you do the math, that’s about $35 a month, pay for $35 a month, you can join our quote unquote meal a day program. But Tony, a couple of things. Number one, it was a ton of work, and number two is it didn’t work very well, like it had a pretty low fulfillment rate. Um, these were in the old check writing days, by the way, that’s how long I’ve been in this industry, um. And um you’re gonna have a hard time dating because I’m 63, so you’re you look like 40 something, so you’re a way to go, yeah, 43. I’m right behind you. Um, the, but the, um, the reason I bring that up is because what one of the things we did that when we pivoted the program was we made it. About the actual guests at the at the mission. Now you had to be careful, uh, you know, privacy, all those sorts of things, but we made it about, um, this idea of you are helping to care for the women, children and families that are at the mission, which at that point was more than 50% of their guests. And Tony, when we shifted from being about meals, which are, if you think about it, inanimate objects that like, well, I guess if I don’t give this month a meal doesn’t happen, sort of abstraction to human connection. To the actual, this is, this is a story of a person and we may have changed their name and, and changed their photo for their privacy, but this is a story of a person you’ve actually directly made a connection with when we made that human connection, the fulfillment rates immediately went up by double digits, like literally overnight, we pivoted from meal a day to this representative sponsorship, and it was a huge lift in fulfillment because we made that human to human connection. So I think of Nicholson and his, uh, pen pal apparently. Yeah it was that human to human connection. How did you get to uh the Union rescue mission? The, the, it sounds like I just kind of hearing your voice that that work really moved you. How did you, how did you get into that work? Well, I grew up in Southern California was was really the part of the reason why it so moved me, and I remember, um, volunteering in high school at um at uh one of the missions downtown San Julian and San Pedro Street, right there, Skid Row, the original Skid Row, Los Angeles. And, and you say in the book that’s one of the most dangerous places in the country. Yeah, it’s one of the most difficult place to this day, it’s yeah, it’s it’s a difficult environment, um, and I’ve I slept at the mission downtown and, um, and served and uh so for me, my first realization that I could do um professionally. The kind of work that I, uh, feel like I’ve really am, am wired for the marketing and fundraising and business and, you know, that kind of stuff. Uh, Tony, the first time I realized that was when I, um, got a job at a fundraising agency. Um, this was 20 years ago, uh, called Master Works, and it was the realization that wait a second, I actually actually could have a career, professional, fulfilling career where I actually am able to help. Uh, causes, um, and the first client I ever had, Tony was Union Rescue mission. So it was, it was doubly, it was a double whammy. It was a personal passion of mine, having grown up in Southern California and having experienced that, but then also right at the point where I realized that my life’s work could be about helping with uh issues and situations like that. And so it’s just, it’s always been close to my heart. How old were you when you started the volunteer work? Oh, the first time I probably went down to Skid Row, I would, I would have been a teenager, um, yeah, early high school, you know, 1516, something like that. That’s not for 15 or 16 year old. What do you remember what was it, was it your parents or what moved you where most people are hanging out with their boyfriends and girlfriends. You know, I, um, it was a school related activity. It was a, it was a, uh, one of the missions down there that did like a shoe exchange, you know, donate, uh, lightly used shoes and then we pair them up with people and so I remember it was the one of the high school teachers that, um, basically said, hey, we’re getting on a bus, we’re going down, we’re going downtown. So then you’re like literally, I was, you know, sorting shoes and stuff, but then you’re helping, you know, uh, individuals find shoes that were great for them and their needs and I just, I still remember that today. And candidly, you know, I just wrote about this week the the question of are we teaching generosity to our children, um, Tony, because now fast forward however many years, 25, 30 years, uh, from that point. Um, I’m a dad, you know, I have two daughters, they’re ages 11 and 14, and I’m asking the question, like, am I, are they seeing me and my wife display generosity? Are they have are, are, are they having experiences that they’ll be able to tell 30 years from now that impact the way they choose to live out generosity in their own lives. Um, and so it’s been a more introspective time, uh, but yeah, thanks for asking that question. And how do you think you can motivate an 11 and 14 year old to, to, to be generous? Oh, I love that. Um, so the first thing, and I was just, this was very top of mind, so the first thing is to, um, make it visible. I think so much of generosity these days can be invisible, and I mean, this coming from a guy who literally just wrote a book about recurring giving, which is generally automated and You know, EFT or, you know, ACH preferably or credit card. And so the first thing that I think especially for us today is how do we make that visible, um, and Uh, that’s the first one. The, the second is, um, how do we, uh, the phrase I use is normalized generosity. I think, um, I think there’s, there can be, uh, an issue with kind of virtue signaling for lack of a better term, like, you know, you look at me, I’m so generous. However, I’ve been guilty of like not talking about my passion for generosity and I think that’s candidly just as. Not just as bad. I don’t know what the right phrase is, but I want, I want my kids, I want the people that are in my life to know that generosity is just a part of who I am. And so in our family, we, we want to do things that help people’s help our kids see that generosity is a way of life. It’s not like, oh, at the holidays, you know, it’s like, no, this is something that we do on an ongoing basis and we actually just had a conversation with our kids. Um, this last week, um, because a local charity, uh, actually it’s a national charity called Atlas Free. They do a lot with human trafficking. Um, our local church actually partnered with Atlas Free to do a, um, a, a program called Freedom February, and there was this idea of the phrase they use is do what you love to fight what you hate. And so do something that you’re passionate about, but essentially raise money to help fight human trafficking. And so my girls, um, on their own said, we wanna, you know, we want to do baked, you know, goods for, uh, for, for, uh, fighting human trafficking. And so my oldest made French macarons. We just spent some time in France, so she’s all about that. My youngest made cake pops and cookies and they sold them. And it was so cool. I have a picture on our website of them at the at the the the Sunday market, you know, selling their, their baked goods, and just the joy on their faces. Number one, they got to do what they love. They actually really do enjoy baking, but this idea of like we are making a difference and, um, I think that’s a memory, I hope, and I think they will, will stay with them for the rest of their lives and will maybe subliminally but will shape future decisions that they have around generosity and the joy of giving. No, you’re, you’re clearly thinking through it for your, for your children, um. Let’s go back to the book. Thank you for a little, uh, personal digression. Uh, we, uh, teased a couple of times, as I said, the, the value proposition. Now this is all part of your, uh, 76 or 7? No, he’s 77 steps, 7 steps to a thriving sustainer program, right? Uh, we don’t have time for all 7. You just, you gotta get the book because, uh, you know, we’re gonna, we’re just gonna, we had a couple. Uh, I would really like to talk about the crafting, uh, your, it’s your number 3, crafting. The an ongoing value proposition. So here’s where we’re explicitly defeating the Myth misunderstanding that this is transactional work, not at all, not at all. Uh, give us your, give us your thinking about, uh, you, you, you make it clear it has to be holistic, you know, ongoing quarter in the slot on, on the value proposition. Absolutely, yeah, you know, in in classic fundraising, you know, that we talk about the offer, you know, how, you know, how much will, you know, a dollar do kind of a deal, and this is an expansion of that. Um, and I do borrow a lot and quote in the book, the, the folks at Next after, they’ve done a lot of work on what I would call single gift value propositions, so like what is, what does it look like to create a value proposition for a single gift, but really it’s not a big stretch to say, OK, what does an ongoing value proposition look like? And so, Um, so a couple things. Number 11 of the mistakes I see organizations make is they use their single gift value proposition and they just say, hey, would you give us that monthly? So, Union rescue mission, classic example, the best single gift offer for the the mission was a meal and shelter, was this like, you know, very low on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, it was a survival need. It was very easy, easy math, you know, $1 could basically a little more than $1 could provide a meal. Um, but like I said, the meal a day program, which is equivalent equivalent of saying let’s take our best single gift offer and just ask for that monthly, was the meal a day program. The fulfillment rates were not good. Um, so, so the first thing is I would just say be careful not to just assume that your best fundraising offer that you might use for single gifts is the same as your best fundraising offer for ongoing recurring giving. So some things to look for as you um define your ongoing value proposition. Um, the first thing is just to be super clear on the problem your organization exists to solve. Then, The second step is to really list out what I call your value claims, and again, this is borrowed heavily from the folks at Next after, but what are those things that are um Uh, that, that That are unique to your organization that helps to answer the question of, yes, we are the solution for this particular problem. Um, and then what you want to do is you list out those value claims, then you, uh, prioritize those. And the best way I know to do that is to actually talk to donors. Um, and so I don’t mean that euphemistically, by the way, Tony, I mean actually talk to don’t like call them, set up interviews, talk to donors. I’ve done that a lot with organizations as a third party, um, but until you actually understand what really motivates the donor and fires their imagination. Then, um, you, you’re just going to be guessing, you know, so talk to donors, and then I would say make sure you answer the question, why is this necessary on an ongoing basis? Because again, unlike uh single gifts, this is a donation that will hopefully be made month after month, year after year, and so you want to have a very clear ongoing need and the ability to then affirm the donor on an ongoing basis as they get towards that need. You make the point too that you should try to target um survival, safety, belonging, those again, those basic sort of Maslow needs. I think every organization has the ability to communicate its need in those sort of lower level survival, safety and belonging needs. And I think, and this is especially for organizations that tend to be a little bit more maybe esoteric or a little more um. Philosophical, you know, we help equip people with knowledge, which is true, but I think the question to for me to that type of a charity is, how does what you do contribute to the survival, safety or belonging of the people that you serve? And um, it’s so important to articulate your need in those terms and not in these kind of like higher functioning self fulfillment. You know, kind of needs, it’s just, um, and that’s really a classic fundraising lesson, you know, the, the more we can talk about how what we’re doing contributes to the survival, safety or belonging of the people we serve, the more just candidly emotionally resonant, um, the program will be with donors. Which one of your other seven steps, uh, to a thriving program? What do you, I’m feeling, I’m feeling very altruistic. We’re talking about talking about your daughters and now what which one what do you want to talk about? Well, we’ve had really two. We’ve hit the first one which is to benchmark your program and by the way, we do have a a vet blueprint guide, um, that is free, uh, Tony, so if folks want to get that, they can get that at sustainablegiving.org. Um, but so the first one we had is a benchmark your program, which is just how many, how much, how many donors do you have today? How much are they giving, and, and that’s a great place to start, crafting an ongoing value proposition and then, you know, just to pick one, I would say, um. I would say let’s talk a little bit about growing your program because that’s hard for you to pick, it’s hard for you to pick a favorite. They’re all my children. Yeah, so the 6th step is really to grow your program and I want to just point out one, there’s a number of things we cover in that that chapter, but one of the things we talk about is sometimes organizations make the mistake of focusing on the wrong growth lever. Um, so there’s two ways to get more new donors into your recurring donor program. Number 1, acquisition, straight, the first gift is a recurring gift, and then number 2 is what I would call conversion, and that is they’re an existing donor, single gift owner, and that you’re and they are becoming choosing to give on a, on a recurring basis. And the mistake I see is that organizations will focus on the wrong one of those two. and so they will be, for example, an organization that really their offer and who they are is really um tuned to them being what I would call a conversion focused organization, where really the best, most significant um success they’re going to see is by acquiring donors as single gift owners and then converting them to recurring. Um, but the mistake I see is I come in and they say, well, we’re running, you know, um, I don’t want to knock a channel, we’re running ads, uh, specifically for acquiring new donors, but nobody’s responding, and it’s like, well, actually your offer and your program are much more conducive to getting a donor in the door and then converting them. And then vice versa, sometimes organizations are very conversion focused when they could be acquisition focused. And so in the book, I’d say, what are the, the, the basic um components of an offer that is more conducive to acquisition. So just for example, um if it’s a highly visible need, very clear solution. Um, and it’s got a very clear specific price point and it’s widely understood. So, uh, for example, uh, not a client, but an organization I’ve respected over the years, Operation Smile. Uh, one of the things they do life saving surgeries, operations, certainly cleft palate, uh, surgeries. And it costs about, I think it was $270 to do a surgery. That’s a perfect acquisition offer because it’s super visible. Like you can literally, photos and video can tell the story of Operation Smile without doing anything else. It’s a very clear solution. We do these surgeries, very specific, you know, need, uh, an offer amount, $270 to a surgery, and that’s like a slam dunk for acquisition. Um, but a lot of organizations, and I would say a majority are more their uh their need, the need is takes a little explaining, um, the offer is not as clear and so it’s more about how do we get donors into the, the front door, giving that first gift and then. Move them candidly within 30 to 60 days, typically to then giving a monthly gift or or a recurring gift. And so that’s just one of the the levers and I write about that in the book of how do you know which one you should maybe uh uh put more emphasis in. You make the point in the book about the 30 to 60 day period. That’s the, that’s the period where people are most likely to convert. You want to flush it out a little bit? Yeah, it’s, it’s the, you know, people ask me when is the most likely time for a new, new single gift owner to convert, and we’ve already answered it, but it’s really right away. It’s that 1st 30, 60 days and I don’t know exactly why I have some hypotheses, you know, I think one of the reasons is that is the point in time when it’s the most fresh to that donor. They’ve made an initial decision to give a gift. Um, and by the way, this is a beautiful thing when you do have crisis type fundraising or disaster funding because those have classically been the most difficult donors to. Get to give a second gift. Um, but thanks to the subscription economy, we are all much more wired to be, uh, willing to do that and so. Um, you have the opportunity to basically within that 1st, 60 days to say, uh, basically two things affirm and invite, affirm that gift, you have made a difference. Thank you so much. You are the type of person that cares deeply about this cause, so you’re affirming, affirming, inferring, but you’re also very directly and indirectly inviting them to stand with the organization on an ongoing basis. And when I do a curve of um when people are most likely to uh convert, the highest time is always in that 1st 30 to 60 days, and then it falls candidly off a cliff for a while and then about a year later it might bump up again. So I’m not saying you can’t get people to convert to monthly giving on an ongoing basis, but that first introduction is, is really one of the most critical windows to uh to do that. You have a little advice on uh naming your sustainer program that that struck me because I, I have a sort of contrary opinion about naming, uh, what I don’t like legacy society, you know, plan giving recognition societies like stay away from legacy and heritage, please. There’s like ubiquitous, it could be anywhere, it could be any charity anywhere leg the legacy society, but share your advice about naming the recurring giving program. I think the short version is, um, and I think I opened that chapter with the Shakespeare quote, you know, um, you know, what a rose by a name, smells sweet, right? But I do think having a name meaning something that you can refer to as essentially a proper noun of the program is helpful because then when you’re referring to it in communications or you’re referring to them, the recurring donor, there’s like the shorthand, there’s the name, where a blank. I think it does create belonging. Um, but, and I outlined in the in the uh chapter on designing your program, really there’s two broad ways to do that, and I don’t think there’s a right or wrong answer here, but one way is what I would call descriptive naming and so that’s like, um, basically it’s our, uh, friends of the family program where you’re literally describing the program, and then there’s what I would call fanciful naming. Um, and that is where it might be more of a metaphor, you know, like Charity Water has the spring, right? Um, and I give some examples of programs in that chapter, uh, and I wouldn’t prescribe one way or the other, um, fanciful or descriptive, uh, but I would say having a name that you can refer to is actually really helpful and, um, and, and a piece of the puzzle. Beautiful, thank you. And so we still have several minutes together, but I kind of like to close on your, your thoughts about the future. That’s your last chapter in the book, the future of sustain or giving, trends you’re seeing. Uh, in terms of mindset, yeah, you know, it’s one of the things that really caused me a lot of consternation in the first year, uh, since of saying I think I should write a book was. These things are changing, right? So how do you, how do you write a book that is then, um, you know, going to stand some test of time? And I will say, uh, those of you that are fundraisers, you know, there’s there’s some real timeless fundraising principles in the book, and so it’s not just certainly not a fad book, uh, or at least that’s not the goal. But I did feel like it would, I would be very remiss to not um include a section in the book on how recurring giving is continuing to change. And so I break that into a couple of different categories. Um, I talk about, um, where what people might think of in terms of technology and how technology is continuing to shift. Um, you know, there was a, there was a comment you made earlier that I was thinking about, you know, in terms of how people are choosing to give, um, I can’t remember offhand, but the, the, the reality is that um technology is shifting. Um, I think I saw a stat the other day, more than 50%, I don’t remember the exact percentage. Of, of, uh, consumers today prefer to use what is called a digital wallet, right? So that’s the thing where I double click on my phone, um, and I can choose my Apple credit card or my whatever Bank of America credit card. And so, you know, things like, um, that the charity I just mentioned that my daughters um did a fundraiser for Alice Free, I was able to You know, standing at the bake sale, you know, actually go in and make a make a gift and use a digital wallet. That’s a big deal when you’re when you’re not on a computer and I don’t have my credit card handy or whatever. So I do, I do have a chapter on technological advancement. I have a chapter on how AI is actually enabling um some capabilities around. Uh, recurring giving I think is really powerful. Um, I do think the donor experience will continue to evolve. You mentioned the one click checkout. I still don’t think most nonprofits have the equivalent of a one click checkout, so I write about that. Um, and then, um, I write about some, some, uh, innovative ways that organizations are thinking about financing, um, recurring giving. Uh, I’ll give you one simple example because that sounds maybe, uh, pretty high level. Um, some of the most innovative organizations I’ve seen have basically, uh, created a system by which they can reinvest in their recurring giving program from new donors. So they basically talk to their board and they say what we want to do is we bring in 10 thousands or millions of dollars a year. We want to reinvest the first. 10 months of value from any new recurring donor, um, to then grow the program and so what it ends up doing is it basically creates a snowball effect where instead of just Uh, you know, investing whatever the number is, um, every month in a straight line, which creates, by definition, linear growth, like, oh yay, you know, it’s growing. When you double down that investment and double down and double down, you essentially get a compounding curve and so I know of organizations that have grown, um. Double and triple digits because they are, uh, basically reinvesting. They understand the value of a new recurring donor and they’re reinvesting that in. And so that’s not very common today. I don’t see that a lot, but where I do see it, I see really explosive growth and so I wanted to shine a light on some of those trends. And where would you reinvest in in promotion, marketing? Technology, well, it depends on what your growth engine is, um, so for some folks, if they’re more of an acquisition oriented, uh, institution, then acquisition versus do more, yeah, do more, you know, face to face or whatever, um, versus an organization that might be more conversion oriented, it might be like, actually, we need to invest more in our single gift acquisition because we know that’s what fuels the funnel for for recurring. And just generally too, you, you anticipate a sustainer first mindset. Yeah, that’s the, that’s the, I don’t see that um completely across the board, but I couldn’t come away and not see that the some of uh many of I would say the fastest growing charities today have this sustainer first mindset and they either have had that for a long time, you think of organizations like the Compassion, International or World Vision, they’ve had that for a long time. Or, um, Charity Water is a more modern equivalent where they’ve had it for, you know, 89 years and that’s created significant growth, and then now they are, um, sort of diversifying their focus, but is it is this kind of this sustainer first mindset, at least for a significant period of time that seems to have been really correlated with rapid growth. The book is the rise of sustainable giving how the subscription economy is transforming recurring Giv, what nonprofits can do to benefit. Uh, person who wrote it is right here in case you, you probably put those two things together by now. Dave Raley, you’ll find him on LinkedIn, you’ll find the book plus the free resources. At sustainablegiving.org. Dave, thank you. Thank you very much for sharing and, and you have my good wishes for your, your daughter’s philanthropy. Oh, thank you. Well, and I, I hope for, for the rest of us, you know, that’s just it’s a deep passion and I do think that sustainable giving is a part of that. So thank you, thank you for investing the time and reading that book and drawing out those insights and, and, uh, yeah, I’m just, I’m just really uh hopeful for uh for our our sector. Next week, mental wellness amid the political chaos. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor Box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. I love that alliteration. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for March 17, 2025: Google Ad Grants & Your Digital Marketing

Sean LittmanGoogle Ad Grants & Your Digital Marketing

Sean Littman has advice for leveraging Google’s generosity and pairing it with your own marketing to grow your email list; encourage giving; revive and cultivate your lists to expand sustainer giving; and, put the right systems in place. He also shares his favorite apps to help you along. Sean is the founder of Catch22 Nonprofit Digital.

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Happy Saint Patrick’s Day and happy Saint Patrick’s week. And I’m very glad that uh it didn’t take me until next week to remember this, so that I’d be wishing it a week late. Not the case, not the case on time. Hope you did something special for Saint Patrick’s Day. I’m glad you’re with us. I’d bear the pain of kiloscasis if I had to stomach the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer Kate to tell us what’s coming. Hey Tony, I’ll be happy to. Google ad grants and your digital marketing. Sean Lippman has advice for leveraging Google’s generosity and pairing it with your own marketing to grow your email list, encourage giving, revive and cultivate your list to expand sustainer giving, and put the right systems in place. He also shares his favorite apps to help you along. Sean is the founder of Catch 22 non-profit digital. On Tony’s take two. Tales from the gym revisiting Missus blood and soil. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. Here is Google Ad grants and your digital marketing. What a pleasure to welcome Shawn Littman to nonprofit Radio. He is the founder of Catch 22 nonprofit digital, a leader in digital impact within the nonprofit sector. He has over a decade of experience in digital marketing, focusing on Google grants, email marketing and retention marketing tactics. Sean’s company is at catch22 nonprofit.com. And he’s on LinkedIn. Sean Lipman, welcome to nonprofit Radio. Tony, thank you for having me. I mean, it’s an absolute pleasure and I enjoyed having you on my show, and it’s always fun to be on the other side of the the microphone for a change and and having the conversations and everything like that. So really it’s an absolute pleasure to be here and I just loved how you your intro, where you’re just like so enthusiastic about it. I couldn’t get myself smiling. Listeners don’t get to see the part where I throw my arms up, but I, I do that. Yes, hello and welcome. um, yeah, I’m glad. Well, thank you, create some energy. And that’s it, that’s the key is you start off, you start off with a bang and you and you roll with it from there. You’re a big advocate of the, the Google ad grants. I know that’s a big part of your, the strategy that we’re gonna talk about. Why don’t you just acquaint folks with what that program is so everybody has a common understanding before we. Get to your advice around around using it. Sure, so Google ad grants is part of the larger program of Google for nonprofits, and Google what Google does is they offer $10,000 a month in search ad credits to nonprofits, and it’s really easy to apply and you just have to um make sure you have a website that’s verified by Google and you have, you have to have all your documentation. And you get, you can apply, it takes about 2 to 14 business days, and you get this grant that enables you to do search ads and better marketing. And we kind of stumbled upon this um by default. I’ve been in the digital space for nearly 10 years. I’ve done everything from lead generation to e-commerce and, you know, we and we kind of stumbled into this by default because we saw a hole in the nonprofit space and with Google grants. And as I mentioned, and I preface, and people always mess this up, it’s search ads. It’s not anything else within Google’s ad networks, you’re only dealing with search ads. And so search ads. are are great because the way you went at Google is being the answer to the problem that people are searching for on the internet. And when you’re creating search campaigns, people are actually in actively searching for stuff on the internet and they’re searching. Well, we’re gonna get to the details. We’re gonna get, I wanna, I wanna have a conversation with you, um. So in in terms of the documentation, I mean just applying for the program, is it, is it just essentially that you need to prove that you’re a bona fide basically, is that, is that what the application is? Yeah, basically, and it’s in any country really, um, you, you just have to show your proof of documentation. OK, OK, so in the US it would be your just your IRS, yeah, your determination letter, OK, but whatever country you’re in needs to prove that you’re a bona fide. Nonprofit and then you qualify for the $10,000 per month. But but it doesn’t stop there also because you also get Google Workspace for free for your organization so you can you can get free branded emails, so you can have your organization at your organization.org free so you’re not paying for workspace and and it’s not limited to however many people in your organization. You can have a as many people as you want on those branded emails. You also get you get a terabyte of Google Drive storage for free per user. You get Google, you get Google Maps, you get enhanced Google Maps and Google My Business, YouTube, um, YouTube, uh, Creator studio, and YouTube fundraising as well. All right. So, so we go a little deeper. Excellent. Well, Google Workspace, what is that? Is that, is that just uh your, your domain or uh emails with your domain or what, what, what, what’s the suite of Google Workspace? It’s Gmail, it’s, it’s Google Drive, it’s Google Sheets, Google, you know, Google, you know, everything within your Google that you currently are paying for, whether it’s 12 $13 a month, you also get Gemini, so you get their AI attached to that as well. Um, so pretty much anything that you’re actively using and paying for within your Gmail, within your Google, you don’t have to pay for it anymore. OK, OK, and this is all part of the, the, the, the, the program that so Google, the ad grants is just is one part of it. I didn’t realize that. I didn’t realize it was different than that. OK, yeah, but, um, right, there’s a lot there. Uh, so the, the, the Google grant, the ad grant is $10,000 per month, is that right? OK. Can we, can we use that much? Uh, I mean, when we’re getting started. Are we just kind of ramping up, you know, getting to that point because that, it sounds like that’s a lot to, that’s a lot to manage. It’s really not if you break it down and if you do it the smart way, and I, I let’s let’s go, let’s go into the smart way for because we’re we’re gonna be using this to grow our email list. So I I I’ll kind of preface a little bit um that we, you know, like I said, we got into this by default because we noticed people were doing this the wrong way. And a lot of people were getting the Google grants and they were just using it to throw throw ads at the wall and see what sticks, and they’re trying to use it for direct donation campaigns. But as I always like to tell people, nobody on the internet is looking for your organization on Google to give you money. It’s just not happening, not in a million years. So how do you use the Google grant effectively, and how do you get to that 10 spend out $10,000 a month? Very simple, you have to have a good funnel, a good offer, the right audience, and a strong follow up. And in order to what I call elevate and accelerate, elevate your communities and accelerate your your monthly giving in your lists. And so the way it works is you set your you set your Google, you set your budget, your daily budget at about $360 to $365 a day, and you create campaigns with within Google Ads based on key search terms that people are looking for. And so, for example, I like to use an example when I deal with a lot of Jewish organizations, right? Um, so it’s when is Rosh Hashanah 2025? When is Hanukkah 2025? When is Passover 2025? Because people are searching for these things. And what we do is we create a couple different adsets based around these with a download that’s connected to that key keyword that keyword and to what they’re searching for. So for example, like for Rosh Hashanah, we give like a Rosh Hashanah cart or something like a down like something like that. But the the landing page that they get to is answering the question. So it says at the top of the header it says Rosh Hashanah 2025 is X day this day falls out on this day, with a little explanation about what Rosh Hashanah is, when it is, etc. Download our free X. And people come and they download the e-guide, and then they get put into an email sequence to continue the conversation, introducing people to the organization. OK, OK, I want to take a step, step at a time. How do we figure out what are our, our best keywords to be. We’re, we’re essentially, we’re bidding on these words. Is that, is that, isn’t that the process? All right, before we get to the bidding process, what, how do we figure out what, what are the keywords that are best for our small and mid-size nonprofit? So there’s several different tools out there that we like to use. Google actually has their own proprietary tool called, you know, Google Keyword Planner. Um, I don’t recommend using it, um, because it’s very, it’s, it’s not always the greatest. So we like to use tools like SpyFoo, SEMrush, ask the people, different keyword planners that go more in depth and really see what the, you know, what the what people are bidding, what the cost is, but also when we’re talking about costs and bids, the Google Grant operates on a different, like on a different playing field than paid ads, because Google doesn’t, your your your grant ads, this is one of the negatives about the Google grant program. Is that you’re not at the same level as someone who’s bidding paying for one is Rosh Hashanah 2025. You’re, you’re kind of like third rung on the on on Google because they’re not here because you’re bidding. No, because you’re you’re the free, you’re the free account. You’re not gonna put, you know, if, if, if it’s, it’s either, you know, put you on the same playing level on the same playing field as as as the people are paying them or not, they kind of quash you down. So you have to be more creative with your keywords and more creative with your with your adsets. And so, and you can’t just bid on single key phrase keywords like you would with paid ads because here Google is giving you money and just like any other grant, you have, you’re subject to their stipulations and rules. So there are not many rules, but you know, single keywords and and and different and and similar things around that are very prohibited. So part of what we do when we do this keyword research on these tools, is look for these strings of keywords that are relevant and as I said, kind of reverse engineer how people do this, create the campaigns based on what people are looking for, versus what a lot of other people do is they do what’s called brand campaigns where they’re just throwing out building on The organization’s name and things related to the organization, which doesn’t always do so well because people aren’t, again, people aren’t going on the internet to look for you. Well, they’re not, your point is they’re not going to look to you to to give necessarily. They’re, they’re looking, they’re looking for information where and you want to start the relationship with them, so eventually they will become a donor, volunteer or a petition signer, you know, whatever, whatever you may be in a lobbying day, etc. but you wanna. OK, OK, um, do me a favor, shout out the three, platforms, uh, apps that you just named for, do that again for uh identifying keywords. Spy Foo was one, Spy Foo, SCM Rush and Ask the people. OK, those are the ones. Ask the people is actually my favorite. Um, because it, it has like a whole web of, like, it shows you like an entire web of things related to and associated with what you’re searching for and it shows you the rankings, and it shows you, it’s very, very in depth. Spy food is, I’m sorry, Ask the people is your favorite of the three. The other two, deserve mention. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s Donor Box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you, a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges. Helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs. Helping you help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now back to Google ad grants and your digital marketing. You also advocate having something. You want to be answering the question that the person that the, the people are looking for. Yes, a landing page that go ahead. The whole, the whole, the whole goal is to be the, as I said before, be the answer to the problem people are searching for, then you win. So. When when it comes to ads, you have to have that the continuity. So it has to go from the ad that they clicked on, you know, which was the ques, which was the, you know, you, they start by asking Google a question, they got the answer. The landing page has to continue to con have that continuity where it’s giving them that answer more in depth. Now a lot of people mess this up too is they send them to a landing page that has all sorts of information on it, and you end up losing, you you end up losing the optic. And so I like to say less distraction, more action. This is why when we create our landing pages, we kind of quasi make them like SEO based articles. They’re more article-based, more informative, very straightforward, no images, no like maybe one or two images, but like nothing crazy because the whole goal is to get you to sign up. And and it works really, really well versus going the other route where you have these pretty fancy pages and everyone and and there’s a million different things like flashing you and distracting you, and then you lose. OK, um, getting you to sign up, sign up is what you want just to be low lift, right? Like is it just email and first name or name, name and email. That’s it, right? And do you require last name or? Usually first name, last name, and email. OK, because I’ve seen pages where they start asking for your phone number, you know, distraction, more in the US I’ve seen zip code, you know, it becomes too invasive and, and less distraction, more action, I understand. So low lift, right? Like, could you get away with just first name and email? because we’re just trying to get this is the introductory phase, right? We’re just trying to be able to address you. Hello Sean. That’s, that’s all you need. Sean and Sean’s email. Exactly. This is somebody who has no connection to you whatsoever, um, is, is stumbling upon you by chance, and if you start getting more invasive with them, then you’re gonna lose them. And you know, the whole goal is to put them through your your flow, to put them into your database to then ultimately add more information, build out that profile of them, and then turn them into a donor constituent petition sign or whatever the heck you. want to do with them. OK, right, so incremental, you may end up getting their cell and their address and their or their zip code, you know, whatever it is you want. But you, you don’t ask for that at the landing page when they, they’re, they’re only 2 minutes into the relationship with you. Correct. And I, and I actually, I want to tell you, I actually do something that nobody does, and we’ve actually started doing this cause we saw we were doing this in the ecom space. It, it’s retention marketing is that you’re driving all this traffic to your site and there’s there’s. There’s tools out there that you can grab people’s information, what’s called anonymous lead scraping. It’s all ethical, it’s all legal, completely kosher. And, and what we do is when people go to these sites, and they, because you have a high percentage of people not opting in, because, you know, from this, that and the other, this grabs their information, their first name, their last name, their phone number, and their email and puts them into your, into your CRM. And in what we do is we send them that ebook because they’re anyways or that offer because anyways they’re browsing for that offer because they landed to your page. We send it to them and say, hey, we saw you were looking at looking at our ebook, here you go. And then it’s then we put them through that initial email sequence continuing to introduce them to the organization. And right, right, right, hold on, anonymous lead scraping. Yes, OK. First of all, it sounds uh dark webbish, but you’re saying it’s not, OK, it’s it’s legal. It’s super. OK. It’s even higher than legal. It’s kosher. All right, there you go. Sean, Sean lives with his wife and 5 children in Israel, so it’s. If it’s kosher, it’s even beyond just the mere legality. All right. What, what can you, uh, you wanna, you wanna give us a couple of what you said there are apps that will help you with anonymous lead scraping. So, so now, so someone comes to your site and you’re getting. You’re getting the information like you’re getting an email from them even if they don’t provide it in the in the simple form. Yeah, and I’ll explain to you how it works is you know when you go to a website and it says I consent to this site, this site tracks cookies and I consent to this. So when you click on that, that’s basically giving the the these these programs the OK, this is how your data gets moved around the internet. You know, everybody shares everybody’s data and you’re you’re consenting to it. So you’re this is how these programs are able to do it. And so we’re actually using a program called Lead Post. Um, there are several other companies out there, one of them is retention.com. Um, and most of these platforms are built for e-commerce companies to do for abandoned carts and for, you know, for, you know, abandoned cart emails and newsletter growth, and I saw, I noticed that we’re when we’re doing this with ecom, I said, what’s the difference between e-commerce and donations? What’s the difference between newsletter signups for ecom and for nonprofits? Nothing, because at the end of the day we’re all about getting money, we’re all about cultivation and getting money. So we started testing this, and it’s been, it’s been seeing insane results both on the direct donation campaigns and pages to recoup donations that were lost and for the for the list growth. And we had this, yeah, so, so, so these are, so these are folks who they, they’ve gone to your landing page. But they don’t want the, they, they’re not giving their first name and their email for the offer, or they haven’t or they or something happened, they want to, but you know, life happens and they well maybe they didn’t like it but but you’re capturing but as long as they’re consenting to the To the cookies, you’re we’ll, we’ll be able to capture their email anyway. Is that, is that what is that that’s the case? Basically, so even if they don’t provide it, we can get it correct? OK, through these apps that you named, uh, do anonymous lead scraping. OK, lead retention is one, and what’s the other one? Le Post is one of them and retention.com is another very popular one. Great, I conflated the two of them into one. OK, you just clarified it. Thank you. All right, so we, and uh, interesting, so I think we’re all accustomed to the, uh, the abandoned shopping cart emails. Yeah, you know, I leave something cause I, I, I just, I changed my mind or as you said, you know, life moved on, I got distracted, kids were crying, you know, whatever it was, my OK, so we’re applying the, the e-commerce. To the nonprofit side, which I love because there I think there are a lot of lessons we can learn, uh, well, I think there are lessons both ways, uh, but we’re, we’re, we’re OK, so we’re applying some e-commerce lessons here. Alright, so now we can, we can open the relationship even with the people who haven’t provided us their name and email. Yeah, here’s the thing. Here’s the, here’s the, here’s the Rosh Hashanah card. Here’s the, here’s the, the download that talks more about the what you originally queried on in Google. Here because we saw you were browsing and we, you left, so here it is. We want you to have it, right? Yeah, basically. OK. All right, so now we’ve opened the door. Um, assuming they don’t unsubscribe because we’ve, we’ve done them a favor. I mean, some folks will unsubscribe, right? That, that’s the nature of the game. Yeah, yeah, right. I’m not, I’m not being negative. I’m just saying, you know, realistic. Some people won’t, don’t want that free. They, they left maybe intentionally. They didn’t want it. But for the other, I don’t know what, what’s our, what’s our retention rate? Like from these, from this anonymous lead scraping, what kind of, what kind of retention rate could we expect after the 1st, 1st message to them? We see a pretty high retention rate because people, like I said, people, they, they were coming anyways from Google search, so they’re already high intent. When they’re when they’re already high intent, but something happens, this is why I love Google versus meta in a lot of different places when it comes to running ads, because Google, you have much more high intent um buyers, much more high intent opt-ins, much more high intent everything, because like I said, people go to Google to to get an answer to the problem, to learn something. People go to meta to space out. OK. OK. Uh, like, take us, take us down the path. Are we, so now we’re just opening an, a standard email relationship with them. Yeah, I mean, I, in my, in my format system, I like to I like to put them on a 10 part email drip, and the first half of these emails is genuine genuine and general like conversation talking introducing the organization, who we are, what we’re all about with Mild call to actions to check out our social channels, check out our website, learn more about what we do. And then each email is another story with a testimonial or with a, you know, with a, a, you know, some sort of like social proof um message. And then as we go down the funnel, as we go down the drip. I start to push them to make a donation, you know, would partner with us, you know, you tell more even more compelling stories, because if you’re an organization doesn’t have compelling stories and content, then you’re doing something completely wrong. Certainly, right, right, 10 part. Yes, 1010, 10 emails over what period? Over the course of of of like two weeks or so. OK. And it’s, it’s all about consistency and people always blocking me. They’re like, why are you sending out so many emails? I said, because if you’re not sending out so many emails and you’re not top of mind, then. And you’re, you’re, you’re lost in the dust. And you’re not concerned that 1010 messages in a two week period is too much. No, I’ve seen, I’ve seen great successes, but again, the whole goal is to be top of mind, because how many emails do you get from people? How many emails do you get, especially like you, for example, how many emails do you get from organizations all the time? Oh yeah, dozens, uh, and, and, and e-commerce also, you know, the, the places I buy from, I hear from, I do hear from several times a week. I’m thinking of like container stores, uh, you know, you say top of mind. Yeah, container store in Lands End are probably top of mind for me most most recently. That’s funny. So when, when you’re when you’re when you’re top of mind. I’m I’m don’t be too surprised, you know, not at all. That’s right, that’s why I left. Alright, so 10, so 10 steps. And when, when are you starting to like roughly what, what, what, what drip of number 1 through 10 are you starting to ask for? A serious ass like a volunteer or or donate. I, I usually do that. I usually do that towards the end, like 89 and 10, 89, 10. OK, because, because again, you’re still in, and part of what we do while we’re with this email sequence, it we also gauge the how how people are how people are interacting with it. So what we’ll do is we’ll we’ll the people who are not opening and clicking we segment those people out into. Infrequent um email list that will send more infrequent content to, and the people that are engaging and opening in every single one and clicking and we can track this. Um, we we put them on a higher frequency like drip after this initial intro sequence. Because these are the people who are going to be your, your doers. These are the people who are going to be your your donors and your partners and your whatever you want them to be, because you see the the level of engagement they’re giving and interaction. OK, so the metrics are important during this introductory 10 drip series, yes. This is why I selected at 10, because it gives you a nice healthy gauge of what type of how people are interacting and what they’re interacting with, because it’s all about communication. Marketing is all everything in life is all about communication, and if you don’t, if you’re not watching the numbers and you’re not watching the the interactions, engagement, how people are commun like engaging with the communicate the the messaging. Then you’re just wasting your time because everybody interacts and and engages with something different. Every message hits somebody different. This is what I love about the nonprofit world, is this is also why I’m taking the ecom stuff over into nonprofit space because you can’t like donations, you can’t, you, you don’t really know what’s in somebody’s, what somebody wants to give, how much they’re they’re gonna pull out the credit card, they can give anywhere between $1 and a million dollars, you know, you never know, you can’t predict owner habits. But you can create messaging that’s going to increase their likelihood of giving you more money, or turning them into a monthly giver for more money. So this is why in this initial 10 part sequence, we like to showcase what you guys are doing, who you’re all who you’re all about, what you’re doing, how you’re doing it, pushing them to the different channels to give them a bigger picture of what the the organization is doing. So that way we can see who’s engaging with what, how they want to be communicated to, and how you speak to them on their level, because this way with smart marketing and communication and copy and storytelling, you’re gonna be enable these you’re gonna be able to turn these people into good money and big money and monthly money cause the goal is monthly money. I like to do monthly giving. I, I’m a big proponent of recurring giving and monthly donations because that’s your cash flow. That’s your cash flow, and if you build that up, you you’re golden. You might be interested in a book uh written by someone who either was just a guest or is soon to be a guest, because I don’t know what sequence the two of you are gonna come in, but his book is. The rise of sustainable giving, and his name is Dave Raley, R A L E Y. Um, all right, let me, uh, let me ask something that, uh, I just came to my attention absolutely yesterday, very timely. Uh, about is involved in this sequence in the, in the early part of this, the, the, um, the Google search results, that Google search AI summaries that we’re all now seeing. are hurting the, the click throughs from search results because I, I, I, I believe it was something like 60% of now recent Google searches don’t result in a click through because people are getting the answer from the, the, the Google AI search, you know, summary. And so that’s it, you know, they, they found the answer to their question and they bail out. There’s no, there’s no click through. Are you concerned about this? Can we overcome it? You’re shaking your head. No, very confidently. I’m not, I’m not concerned about it at all because if, if, if Google wants to do away with search ads on both the page and the grant. Side of things and replace it with with Gemini, they would. But clearly there’s a reason why Google has not replaced search ads because search ads play a huge role in Google in and and a in a major chunk of Google’s revenue because people are still doing search ads and it’s all about creating smart search campaigns. And smart and smart funnels built around the search campaigns that take you further than just answering your question because you and, and so part of what we do, as I said, we, we create smarter campaigns that are really solving the problem and driving them to the page with the offer connected to it. And so, but Google, Google likes to try to push this stuff on people, um, but at the same time, if they were to completely get rid of certain things within their ad networks, they’d be losing a massive chunk of revenue, and search ads make up a massive chunk of Google’s revenue. OK, so they’re not gonna replace that revenue with, uh, with their, their bunch of things. Gemini search summaries. OK, OK, right, I just, I’d like to hear from the experts on this. Um, all right, so is there anything else before we move on to your advice about reviving lists that, uh, may have become dormant or, you know, a little sleepy. Anything else on the, on this, on this search side building the list? Um, it’s really just about again, creating the right campaigns that are going to get people to opt in and then keeping up with the engagement. Once you, once they finish that main sequence, then you put them on a, on a general sequence, continuing the conversation, talking about what’s going on in the organization, whether it’s a weekly newsletter or whether it’s, you know, a couple two email, you know, another like I, I like to do weekly newsletters. Um, and also, you know, anything new that’s going on just to keep up the conversation, because again, it’s all about continuous, you know, engagement. One of the things that we also do with these email sequences, and I’ll talk about this, it kind of overlaps with your next question, but one of the things that we do is we like to create engaging content pieces that turn into email sequences, and one of my favorite ones that we did was called Meet the Heroes. Um, and we, we, we go through and we interview people within the organization cause I always like to say everybody from the janitor all the way to the CEO and and the executive director has a reason why they’re working in the organization, and they like it. And you get everybody’s stories and everybody’s perspectives, and you turn this into email marketing, meeting everybody in the organization, sharing that to to the list, and we rip these out, you know, once a week, you know, to people, and they get a new hero in their inbox, and it turns into a lot of money. It’s time for Tony’s Take-Two. Thank you, Kate. We’re revisiting Mrs. Blood and soil. You’ll remember her, uh, in my very first aerobics class that I went to, probably 18 months now. It’s been, uh, that I go to these Tuesday classes. I wanted to position myself next to her and I didn’t know that, you know, she had her set spot because it was my first time in the, in the room. And uh she was uh a little difficult, a little difficult, you may recall, so uh I dubbed her Mrs. Blood and Soil. Well, I had occasion. a couple of weeks ago to uh be next to Mrs. Blood and Soil again. I got there a little late, there was a space. So I went up, went over, it’s the last row. She likes to be this is her last, she’s in the last row against the wall of mirrors there. 2nd, 2nd from the left, that’s her spot, as we, as we all know. So I tried to be 3rd from the left in the back row against the mirrors. So I said, uh, you know, uh, I, I think I can uh fit in here. What do you, what do you think? Well, as long as you’re not too active. OK, uh, Mrs. Mutton soil, this is an aerobics class. I’m not gonna be able to confine myself to a 12 square inch little piece of ground over here next to you in an aerobics class. We’re jumping, we’re moving up, we’re moving back, we’re doing jumping jacks, we’re gonna do steps sometimes. We do weights, so lighten up, this is blood and soil, but I didn’t say any of that. I didn’t say any of that. I said, I think we’ll be OK. And then I introduced myself. I’m Tony, she said, so now she’s no longer needs to be Mrs. Blood and soil. She’s Val, Val. Which I, uh, which I realized could be either a man or a woman, Val, but she’s, she’s a woman, and she’s in very good shape. I think I’ve said that before. I have to give her, she’s very fit and does very well in the class. So, all right, so she gives me a little trouble with, well, as long as you’re not too active. Through the class I’m thinking like it’s as if she has a deed to this second from the left spot in the back against the mirror walls. You know, I’m applying to the board of adjustment for an easement, a right of way through her deeded land. Well, as long as you don’t use it too often, we can let you walk on it, but don’t ever bring a bicycle on your easement, no. So, that’s Mrs. Buttonsoy, Val, Val, uh, at the end of the class, I said, uh, nice to meet you, Val. She said, nice to meet you. OK, clearly, she forgot my name. That’s right. I guess I’m, I’m very forgettable, but Val is not. Val will, my memories of Val, I see her every Tuesday morning. She is not at all forgettable. This is Blood and soil, thou. That is Tony’s take too. OK. Look at you for being the better person and introducing yourself. I took the high road. It’s very, very good of you. And what did I get? As long as you’re not too active in an aerobics class aerobics don’t move around too much in this aerobics class, and, and if you don’t, then, then you could be next to me. The entitlement exactly. We’ve got Bou but loads more time. Here’s the rest of Google Ad grants and your digital marketing with Shawn Lipman. So this is going into your advice about reviving. Correct uh uh sort of a lackluster list. These are your, your lapsed folks who, who are these, who are these folks that we’re trying to revive? What’s this population look like? So these are all people that, you know, you deal with enough organizations to know that everyone has don donor lists and email and databases of people that they’ve engaged with at some point and these people have had something to do with the organization at some point or another. And most organizations because for lack of better, you know, terms, they just suck at marketing. And they don’t have the bandwidth to have people dealing with their email coms. And so when you don’t have people can keeping up the conversation with your with your list, you know, you could grow a ton of people, but you gotta stay, you gotta stay top of mind. So a part of it and so they, they just kind of neglect the email list because they’re like, you know what, we’ll just deal with them when we need money, but then when you do, when they, when they come in for money like who the hell are you? Like, why should I talk to you? It’s just, you know. It it’s relationship building, communication relationship building. And so what we do is we go in, this is actually the first thing we do before we launch any Google campaigns. I call, I like to get these as quick wins, you know, we go in and we create, we create a wake up email sequence, just talking, saying, hey, what’s going on? It’s, it’s, um, you know, save the whales. We’ve been out here in the beachfront saving the whales for a while. It’s our it’s our bad, we haven’t talked to you in a bit, but check out what we’ve been doing. Look at that. Shamu is all clean. You know, just like quick little like punchy emails that started off the conversation, so you can see who’s actually engaging, who’s actually a wake up, wake up, you got it. And then, and then you slowly drip them into um more in-depth stuff, and then you, you segment out the people who didn’t, because then you can see who’s actually engaging and who’s actually not even a valid email anymore. So that you can clean up your list and then you start dripping out content like Meet the Heroes and other content series, um, emails, um, that can be that people can engage with. And let me ask you uh what kind of parameters are we looking at? Like how long lapsed would you, would you go back? I suppose, suppose we haven’t had any communication with the person for a year. Is that, is that in your opinion, is that too long to try to wake them up a year too long? No, you can do anything because again, what I’ve noticed and I’ve studied this is just by doing this a million times, is that all people want is just to feel like, feel like you care about them. So it doesn’t, you know, sometimes, you know, you, you stopped caring about me. Like I, I’ve heard from you for a year now. Where you been? Well, that, well, that, that’s, that’s why, that’s why a little like, hey, what’s going on? Just wanted to show you that we’re alive kind of type of thing. We didn’t, we didn’t really forget about you. We’ve just been so busy saving the whales and the planet that we forgot to talk to you, and most people are very receptive about it. that’s what they want, you’ll get, you’ll get some folks back. You’re saying lots of folks. You’ll get, you’ll get some folks back and then of course you’re gonna segment. Some folks are not gonna respond. They’re not, they’re not gonna wake up, uh, of course, of course you’ve got your, your bad emails, you know, that’s a different category, but some folks, they’re getting the message they’re not gonna, all right, they’re not gonna reply, but for the ones who do, you’re trying to reinvigorate now. Exactly. Exactly. OK. Um, any other advice about, uh, reviving? What else are you doing? You don’t hold back on nonprofit radio listeners now. You have, uh, you know, you, you do this, you said a million times, but what else, what else around the? What’s, it’s really all about just sitting down and understanding what your organization does and how we can create engaging content stories to to share with them. And email marketing is a lot like a serial, you know, you, you always want to, you gotta, you people, you wanna keep up the engagement. It’s not, you know, you wanna build like a series. Of of content that’s going to engage with people. That’s why the Meet the Heroes is something that we found replicates really well amongst organizations, um, you know, we have, you know, all all sorts of other different things again, it’s really organization specific, but like highlighting different different things within the organization that they’re doing. And really showing people, making the the whole goal with emails with these email campaigns, and then you can transpose this into social media too, is getting making people feel and getting them to feel live vicariously through the organization without having to be on the ground scrubbing the oil off the the fish, you know. Of Shamu. All right. OK. When you said er, you said it’s like cereal, I was expecting you were saying like a sugar rush or so, but I had the wrong side on the serial uh metaphor in mind. OK, S E R I A L. Yeah, it’s, it’s continuous conversation and then that’s also part of like the whole strategy to when you get to that big campaign, cause everybody, you know, and when you know, people are already ready to jump. You tell them because you’ve been in contact with them, they see that you’re engaging with them, they see that you care about them, you know, you’ve showcased what’s going on, you’ve engaged, you’ve you’ve invited them in. So now when it comes to the campaign, you say jump, they they say how high. OK, that’s the ideal. Um, what’s your advice around storytelling? Sounds like you, you write a lot of, you write a lot of emails for clients, you write a lot of newsletters, weekly, what, what, what tips do you have around storytelling digitally? Storytelling, digital storytelling, you know, everybody’s got, everybody, everybody’s got a story. Everyone’s got something to share and you gotta, you gotta you gotta sit down and understand. Um, who your audience is and how you talk to them and understand, you know, how to communicate that with them, your message to them, because just, you know, not everybody is gonna relate to one specific thing, and you have to be able to um extract the information out of the like the founder’s head or somebody who’s, you know, one of the volunteers’ heads, you have to be able to take that and and really put it into compelling marketing. And it’s all about showing when you’re doing when you’re doing a storytelling, it’s not tell no one no one cares what you’re telling them. You have to show them like saying I I learned this actually a long time ago when I was creating a resume, which I’d never use anymore, thank God, but someone was telling me you don’t say, you know, you, you know, it’s about showing people what you’re doing in numbers, not telling them I do this, this and this, cause no one cares what you do. So give an example. I wanna pick your brain here, give an example of what showing instead of telling. So, like, I’ll go back to, to meet the heroes, right? You, you know, let’s say I, I work for an EMS, a volunteer EMS organization, and I got 10 kids and I’m volunteer, but I still go out there and take EMS calls. And so you’re asking me how, why, why do I love doing this? So I’m gonna, I, so we asking the right questions to get the right answers out of people’s like being a podcast host. So I’m gonna show you through my answers. Like, you know, I love being, you know, a mass volunteer because it gives me such uh uh the ability to go out there and help people and and and take care of them and transport them to the hospital, and being able to make sure that they’re they’re OK, and I just genuinely like helping people. And I got into this because I do I love doing X, Y and Z and painting that picture and that story around. The person and showing people how, you know, this person is impacting so many lives, and he’s just one guy, you know, just going out there doing volunteer shifts. You know, it’s about painting that bigger picture, the broader strokes of what’s going on within these people’s stories and this or the the organization. You know, another another organization, you know, let’s say for example, they, you know, I’m trying to think off the top of my head, something I did recently. Um, I can’t think off the top of my head on the spot. I apologize. That’s all right, um. Let’s pick, uh, let’s pick an arts organization, hypothetical, I don’t have any particular one in mind, but let’s say it’s a theater group. So would you, what would go through, uh, like I’m gonna, I’m gonna follow the processes of, of Sean’s brain. What do you think? All this theater group, look, it’s a nonprofit now, $2 million annual revenue. They’ve got 5 or 6 full-time employees. They put on 2 shows a year. So, so let’s sit down, let’s sit down and meet with the, the company director. You know, we’re dealing with theater, right? I, I, I, I know these words. Let’s, let’s sit down and meet with the company director and why she, why she decided to open this organization? What was her passion? What inspired her to be, what, how is she a hero to the millions of people who are coming to watch her shows, and what’s the, what’s the, what’s the outcome that she wants to bring about with this, with the with this with this organization? Who’s she trying to inspire? And let’s sit down and craft a story about, you know, Who she is, what she’s all about, and the organization to show people how taking the act of of of dance and music in a play and bringing it to the bigger stage is going to empower people to do X, Y, and Z. It’s about taking that story and painting the bigger picture with it. So for example, a theater organization, so I, let’s say I run a theater company. I started this. Why let’s meet the hero. Why did I start this? I started this organization because I have a strong passion for music and dance and art, and I wanted to be able to empower people who are not who don’t have the means to go to Juilliard, who don’t have the means to go to the New York Academy of Dance or whatever, and I want to give them the same abilities that I that I did and show them that the Through the through arts and music, it can be very empowering. It can also be life changing. And so my, my whole aim of the organization is to give people the tools they need to succeed by doing through the outlet. I put you on the spot. That was very excellent. I’ll let you off the hook, but I can also I can also see some fun like telling. Backstage stories. Exactly, exactly. Backstage stuff that nobody sees. This is also why I used to produce podcasts for nonprofits because I used to, I found I I I would, I would show them how creating a podcast create gets you multiple forms of content for the organization, but also creates a narrative, and people can go out, you can have people on your show talking to them about different things. Like I said, I created a podcast that was so popular it was for a volunteer EMS organization. Um, a Jewish one where we interviewed all these different directors from all the different branches all over the world, getting to understand their stories, who they are, what they’re all about, why they got involved in this, and hearing their perspective, you know, one guy from Baltimore, one guy from New York, one guy from Chicago, Detroit, you know, getting their perspective on it, and, you know, you have questions that can remain constant questions, but everybody is gonna have a different answer. When I lived in New York City, I used to see uh Hao Ambulances. Is that the organization? Yep, we created a podcast for them called the Hatzola Cast. Oh, that’s that’s a worldwide. It’s worldwide. I didn’t I created it for the local one here in my city in Israel. And the whole goal was, was a branding campaign because they’re all connected in some way, but was interviewing all the different executive directors of each different branch and hearing their stories and these guys had crazy stories because, you know, they’re all, you know, they’re all in the back of the bus, you know, doing, you know, you know, taking saving lives. Yeah, and people loved it because it was real people talking about real things and it worked as a as a as a tool for donations and and growth and, you know, branding. And storytelling pod what’s a podcast? It is a storyteller, yeah, yeah. All right, Hatzola. I, I always thought, you know, being a, a geocentric uh New Yorker at the time, and I just figured New York City was the, it was the only site of Hatzola, but uh it was, it was, it’s worldwide, it’s worldwide, right, all right. OK, awesome, um. Let’s move to uh a third topic, you have advice around. The right technology, uh, sort of your tech stack around this, this process that we’ve, we’ve been talking about these first two steps, you gotta have technology supporting you, you know, we’re not, well, we all know the value of technology. So what are we, what are we looking for? What kind of considerations, how do we know we’ve got the right stuff? What’s your order in the spot here. So I’ll tell you, you know, not to, not to toot my own horn, but I do actually have a software company called GivSuite, and it was an answer to a problem that we were experiencing, and this is, and I also, and I put on a webinar called Not All Systems are Created Equal because software is all about strategy. It’s not about people like to look at SAS software. A solution. I look at SASSA software as a strategy, because at the end of the day, the right tools for your organization are going to be the right tools for your organization to enable you to grow and scale, because nobody wants to sit around working with technology that’s going to send them back a couple of years instead of propelling them. So you want to have the right software and the right tools for the job. And so when it comes to looking at software as a strategy, you have to understand what how big is my organization? What am I looking to do? What are my what problems am I currently having with what I’m currently using? Is it costing me too much money? Are, are, are we, are we being charged every time we’re trying to grow? Are we being, are, are there limitations to certain functionalities within our system? Do we, is, is our data a mess? Like, you know, there’s all different types of questions and answers that you have to sit down and really understand before you make the right to choose a product that’s gonna be for you. Like there’s a lot of in the nonprofit world, there’s a range of products, there’s free there’s free platforms, there’s freemium platforms, there’s super expensive platforms that nobody knows how to use, but for some reason, everybody loves them, but they don’t know how to use them. And then there’s there’s there’s diff there’s, you know, us, we’re we’re we’re an all inclusive platform that, you know, doesn’t charge you an arm and a leg. And but again, it’s all what’s ideal for you. And so you have to you have to know, you have to sit down and understand what your what what your wants are versus your needs. That’s really the key, because everybody always wants, you know, it’s it’s the wants versus needs, you know, everybody always wants everything under the sun, but do you know how do you use everything under? do you know how to use everything? What do you, you have to understand what your needs are in order to scale. What, what about, uh, say for instance, integration with your CR right? So shouldn’t all these, all these contacts that these uh are, are 10 or 10 drip series, these shouldn’t these be? Ideally noted in each person’s record who gets one as a as a as an outbound contact. So talk about uh integration with your, your CRM database. So integration is a really big thing and a lot of the, you know, a lot of these platforms do have integrations with your CRMs, but it’s also very frustrating because you still have to download the data and you have to upload the data or you have to set up the automation, like the connecting tools that work with it, and those tend to get pricey. Because, you know, it’s going based on on what, you know, using Zapier. It’s a connecting app that goes based on Zap. So the more the more records you’re bringing over, the more the more expensive your plan is. But when you have, for example, again, using my system as an example, not a plug for it at all, I promise you, is that when you have something, everything all encompassing all in one, you’re not relying on outside data and third party tools to push everything because everything is already in the system. And so you have to figure out way out the cost too. Some of these other platforms are gonna charge you um for for integrations. Some of them are gonna charge you, you know, different fees based on the integrations, and some of them are also gonna charge you different fees based on how many people are using the system. So you also, you have to weigh out all these different, these different things in order to figure out what the best tool is gonna be for you. For you. All right. All right, Sean, why don’t you leave us with uh some inspiring words to uh to close around. Around all of us, around the digital marketing, digital relationships. Well, OK, I, I mean, I always like to say there’s nothing new under the sun, and it’s all a matter of how you take it, package it, and, and repurpose it, and how you and how you make it your own. In the marketing space, especially in nonprofit space, the whole goal is you want everyone’s doing the same thing. Everyone’s going after the same thing. Everyone wants everybody’s money. There’s not that much money, you know, you, you know, floating around. You know, there’s not that many big big checks floating around so much anymore. You know, you have to focus on the micro donation. So the goal is how do you raise your hand higher than everybody else? And in the nonprofit space, you have to really sit down and understand who you are, what you’re all about, what makes you so special, why should I care about you? Because you’re competing with everybody else who wants those same donations. So in order, so you gotta take a step back before you start any marketing campaign, before you start anything with your organization, say. What makes me so special, and how do I raise my hand higher than everybody else? And once you figure that out, then you’re gonna win. And, and once you once that that’s how you’re gonna win. So I hope that I hope that was a solid piece of advice. Um, I, I tell it to a lot of people and the ones who take me seriously are actually successful, and the ones who don’t take me seriously, then they call me complaining and I say tough nuggies. Let’s not leave you with tough. Let’s not have too many of the tough noogies. All right, Sean. Catch-22 nonprofit digital. The company is at catch 22 nonprofit.com. You can connect with Sean on LinkedIn. Thank you very much, Sean. Appreciate you sharing all this. You know, thank you very much, Tony, for having me on the show. It’s been a pleasure. Next week, great value in sustainable giving. That was supposed to be this week, but the host messed up. If you missed any part of this week’s show. Actually, I did not mess up. This is not a mess up. Uh, this is a more logical flow to have Sean this week and then expand on sustainable giving next week. And by the way, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. DonorBox, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for March 10, 2025: Politically Motivated Attacks: Who, What & How

Tim Mooney: Politically Motivated Attacks: Who, What & How

Attacks on our nonprofit community are happening and the environment is likely to get worse before it improves. Just last week Elon Musk called our community a Ponzi scheme. The week before, he claimed only 5-10% of our work does any good, and that the sector is a big scam and a giant graft machine. You need to know who is a potential target of the attacks; what form they take; and, how to proactively protect your nonprofit. Tim Mooney, from Alliance for Justice and Bolder Advocacy, helps you understand.

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer with dipsesis if I had to thirst for you not to tell me that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer Kate with what’s up this week. Hey Tony, here’s what’s up. Politically motivated attacks. Who, what and how. Attacks on our nonprofit community are happening, and the environment is likely to get worse before it improves. Just last week, Elon Musk called our community a Ponzi scheme. The week before, he claimed only 5 to 10% of our work does any good, and that the sector is a big scam and a giant graft machine. You need to know who is a potential target of the attacks, what form they take, and how to proactively protect your nonprofit. Tim Mooney from Alliance for Justice and Boulder Advocacy helps you understand. On Tony’s take 2. Especially now, please follow your meds. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. Here is politically motivated attacks. Who, what and how. It’s a pleasure to welcome this week’s guest Tim Mooney, senior counsel at Alliance for Justice, has guided nonprofits through the maze of political and tax exempt law for over 2 decades. He empowers organizations to elevate their impact, challenge the status quo. Uh, particularly relevant now, hopefully it’s not the status quo for very long and drive meaningful progress. You’ll find Tim at Tim Mooney on BlueSky, also on LinkedIn, and you’ll find the Alliance for Justice at AFJ Alpha Foxtrot Juliet.org. Tim Mooney, welcome to nonprofit radio. Tony, thank you so much. This is a real pleasure to be here. I’m glad. Thank you. Thank you very much for, uh, for, I’m glad it’s a pleasure for you as well, because I always say that it is a pleasure to host you, host our guests. The Alliance for Justice, Boulder advocacy. I don’t know, you seem to be busting at the walls. I mean, I, I see you, I see the alliance and Boulder advocacy almost uh a couple times a week now. I, I spent a lot of time on LinkedIn and more now on Blue Sky. I don’t know. I, I, I will confess that, uh, before January, I had not heard of the Alliance for Justice or Boulder Advocacy, and now I feel like I’m seeing you several times a week. What what’s the alliance about and what’s the boulder advocacy program inside the alliance? Yeah, sure. We, we’ve been around for a few decades now at Alliance for Justice, and we are an association of, uh, give or take 150 or so organizations, and we all share a commitment to an equitable, just and free society. And we, as our tagline says, we build the strength of progressive movements by training and educating nonprofit organizations on advocacy. I’m reading this, you can tell, while harnessing their collective power to transform our state and federal courts. If you want to break that down, basically, I just assumed you had it memorized. Oh, I wish I did. One of these days the office does a lot of. Work on courts and judges and making sure that these are the folks that represent the interests of the people, not other types of interests. My side of the office is bolder advocacy, and we’ve been making some news lately just because of, you know, gestures broadly, all of this stuff that’s been going on. We help equip nonprofits with tools, knowledge, and understanding on how to be the best advocates that they can be, and we try to do that in the best way, which is to harness grassroots organizations to help reform systems, make positive policy change, but to be the leaders in the communities that they are. And that’s been my job for in in a couple of different stints here for the better part of 10 plus years and it’s um It’s, it’s more interesting now than it ever has been. I think I will, I will say that. Uh, uh, among the resources that you have, which are pretty vast, uh, at, at the, at the Boulder advocacy, uh, in that, that part of the site, um, you, you, you do counseling. I mean, people can talk to an attorney, not for representation naturally, but you can, you can chat or. Chat or converse with one of the boulder advocacy attorneys, right? That’s right. Uh, myself and my colleagues are all lawyers, but as we like to say a lot, we’re not your lawyer. Um, we are all trained and, and I’ll, I’ll sheepishly say we are experts in this very strange niche area of federal tax law, a little bit of state law, a little bit of nonprofit corporations and things along those lines, election laws. That makes up what it means to be a tax exempt organization, particularly around advocacy, and a couple of the things that we do, we are available for technical assistance questions, give us a call, you can send us an email, you can even fill out a little form on our website, and we try to get back to you within 24 to 48 hours with an answer. 9 times out of 10, we can answer most people’s questions, so long as it’s around you being an advocate as a tax exempt organization. We also do trainings, um, we were talking offline before we started recording that I was just recently in Seward, Alaska of all places, uh, with the wonderful people there, child advocates, and uh did a big training on on what it means to be an advocate and the the the basics around lobbying activity as they’re considering a ballot. Measure potentially uh in Seward itself. So, um, do those types of things we do trainings on the topic that we’re going to be talking about today, politically motivated attacks during the election season, we’re pretty busy talking about what you can do around elections. We have publications, we have one pagers, we even have a podcast of our own called Rules of the Game. And a lot of other things. So lots, lots going on at Boulder Advocacy. Yeah, there are, there’s a ton of resources there, but I, I, and I was particularly impressed by the fact that you can have a conversation with an attorney. All right. All right. And that’s, um, now AFJ.org is where the Alliance for Justice is boulder advocacy remind us where we’re gonna find that. Uh, we are now folded into the main AFJ website, so just go there and hit boulder advocacy at the top of the screen. It may be AFJ.org/boulder advocacy, but don’t quote me on that. You don’t, right, you don’t need that part. It’s just all part of the Alliance for Justice. OK, OK. Um, let’s, uh. Yeah, let’s get into what’s been going on. I don’t, I, I, we don’t need to spend time on uh What, what’s brought us to have this conversation? Why, why I’m now seeing boulder advocacy multiple times a week, you know, since January 20th, uh, essentially, or maybe the 22nd. Um, and I think we know, regrettably, we, we share this common understanding of what’s gotten us here. Um, what, what are some of the, uh, organizational potentials, you know, I mean, I, I, I, I. Uh, I also regrettably, I mean, it could be 100%, but you’re seeing attacks at, at, uh, uh, certain, certain types of missions, certain types of work. Why don’t you flesh that out for us. Yeah, I mean, this actually goes back before kind of the current administration. We’ve been seeing attacks against nonprofit organizations for a very long time and and what you said is exactly right. It tends to be on topical organizations. It tends to be organizations that are working in particular hot button issues, and modern day DEI LGBTQ rights, reproductive rights, immigration, the usual, the usual cast of characters these days. But you know, it goes back even further civil rights organizations were targeted by independent organizations uh uh a long time ago, you might have heard of a clownish group called Project Veritas that would go out and went after organizations. So this is a tactic that has been used Project let’s just remind us is Project Veritas, that was the organization that was surreptitiously creating videos, right, interviewing people without their knowledge, uh, being, being videotaped, and then. I think selectively editing those recordings and embarrassing, wasn’t Planned Parenthood one of them. Planned Parenthood was one. There were other, there it is, it is targeted groups through the years. I, I believe that it went through some interesting, uh, drama recently and the original founder left, but I do believe it still exists. The big thing was they’re an ideological organization that is trying to, you know, put a metaphorical stick in the front tire of of the bicycle of these organs. to try and get them to go over their handlebars. But their tactics are mischievous and uh I would say unethical. I mean, it’s very clear that they are selective in their editing. They are would go after organizations um in their most vulnerable places, speaking to volunteers or other folks that don’t have that kind of training and essentially, you know, in a surreptitious way lead them to say things that they know that they could edit in a way that makes it look uh. Not good in for that organization, even though that was a misrepresentation of of the conversation of what the organization was doing. Those are the types of things that we’ve seen for a really long time. What we are seeing now is that still, because there are some keyboard warriors out there that are are doing those types of things too in addition to groups like Project Veritas and then their progeny. But we’re also starting to see this happen in official channels as well. And of course, you know, this administration is rife with it right now, um, and what they’re doing, that’s almost its own category, but of course we’re seeing this at the state level as well. We’re seeing questionable, uh, investigations by administrations at the state level against organizations. Again, targeting organizations that are doing the type of work in these hot button areas, um, You know, it almost goes to say that they’re being successful, these organizations in, in, in convincing the public of their point of view on these types of issues. And so what has to happen? Well, these investigations, these phony investigations come about in a way to try to discredit them when they can’t win on the on the merits of the argument, at least that’s kind of my point of view on some of this. So that’s what we’re seeing a lot of. We are Having a lot of organizations ask us, when they give us a call, when they ask for our technical assistance about what they can do to be prepared to fight back in those types of situations. And the honest answer is, is that, you know, if, if you’re doing this after you’ve been attacked, you know, you’re a little bit behind the eight ball. You really do need to be prepared for these types of things. In advance. And so we’ve created a variety of resources that will help organizations to think about to plan and to be ready in the event that they are attacked by one of these types of actors, official actors, state actors, or otherwise. Yeah, and we’re gonna get to how to protect your your nonprofit in advance. What should you what what what should be dotted, what should be what I should be dotted and T’s crossed in advance to Reduce the likelihood because you can’t eliminate the possibility but reduce the likelihood that you’ll be, uh, you’ll be targeted, uh, or that, uh, you know, an attack would be meritorious at all even on its face that you’d be able to defeat it. Um, what about, uh, in swing states are you, are you seeing any greater activity now in the, in the 6 or 7 swing states? Yeah, I think we’re starting to see it in, well, really in a lot of different states, you know, certainly in swing states, we’re seeing that any place where there’s a chance where there’s a tipping point, um, I think that that’s certainly a case, um, you know, and, and, you know, you see this all over the place too, red states, blue states, whatever. It’s just a question of what are the tactics that are being used. I mean, we’re starting to see a lot of them more in red states, at least the two that I’m thinking of, Texas and Ohio. Recently, Missouri is the 3rd 1, where, you know, traditional red states where there’s been some state investigations, but you know, you’re you’re you’re seeing these attacks happen also in blue states as well, often by third parties. So there’s no safe place for lack of a better way of putting it, um, from these types of attacks. You need to be prepared for these types of things, you know, we just like you have a good password on your computer because you’re, you know, hackers are everywhere, you need to be prepared for types of things like this. Yeah, and we’ll get into the preparation, which is essentially insurance to, to protect yourself in case you are uh you are targeted. Um, what, what, what kinds of attacks, there are, there are many different approaches that either government or some of these nefarious third actor, third party actors are, are conducting. What, what are you seeing there? Yeah, there’s a wide array of tactics that we’ve seen. And the interesting thing also is that once something is successful, we tend to see some copycat action in there. Um, the categories though that we see are claims of violation of the law is one really big one. So are you a public charity, 501c3, um, you know, there are certain restrictions on what you can do. There’s a limitation in how much lobbying you can engage in. You’re prohibited from doing things to support or oppose candidates. Claims. That you’re violating those types of restrictions is a pretty common thing, uh, claims of engaging in voter registration fraud or some other type of election related activity for a tax exempt organization. And yet, and yet there are provisions that allow us to do all these activities. Absolutely, and voter registration is perfectly bona fide. There’s there’s a certain degree of lobbying and advocacy that you can do as a 501c3 as long as you take the safe harbor. That’s right. And, and, and, you know, there you are allowed to lobby, you’re allowed to lobby actually a fairly generous amount, but it, you know, there are accusations by some groups that you’re exceeding that and a complaint is lodged. Um, you are allowed to engage in a whole host of nonpartisan activities as a public charity. elections, voter registration, get out the vote efforts as long as it’s nonpartisan, you’re fine. What we’ll see is accusations that these nonpartisan activities are really this kind of cloak and dagger, really technically partisan, trying to get somebody elected type of activity. And of course, usually that’s a garbage accusation. But that’s the kind of stuff that’s put out there. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s DonorBox, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you, a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges. Helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs. Helping you, help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now back to Politically motivated attacks. Who, what and how. That’s so insidious because it, it creates a chilling effect, you know, it, it discourages the nonprofits from exercising the rights that they are given in the Internal Revenue Code for the types of things that you and I are talking about now and maybe others, maybe other statutory frameworks as well, but I, I know the Internal Revenue Code as a, as a start. So it creates that chilling effect and then. You know, if you are, if you’re not chilled and you do uh do exercise the rights that your nonprofit has, uh, you’re, um, you’re attacked for it. Yeah, and I think that chilling effect is really the number one tactic here, or at least that’s the the end game, because it’s just, it’s to shut you up, but it’s more pernicious than that even. Uh, a lot of these attempts will go after the funders of organizations that are doing the things that these folks don’t want to have happen. And so what they’re trying to do is they try to defund you. Now, of course, we’re seeing that at a in a different way, officially through the federal government in in recent weeks. But then there’s, you know, attempts to attack your funders, try to say, uh, shame funders into thinking that The grantees are doing something wrong or awful or terrible and try to leverage them to stop funding and pressure to withdraw that support. So chilling effect is really more than just directed at the organization. It’s it’s against the larger network that supports that organization too, including supporters. How are they getting to the supporters? We use two good words, insidious and and uh nefarious. I love the pernicious. No, you said pernicious, insidious words, right? Yeah, yeah. Um, how are they getting to the funders? I mean, are we talking about like individual funders? Uh, so there’s, I mean, there’s, there’s institutional, they might be a little easier to get to, but individual funders, are we, are we seeing it on that level also? Well, what we’ll see we’re donors and donor against against individual donors. The idea here is to try to discredit the organization in a way where it loses its support within the community as well. As you mentioned, institutional funders, private foundations and the like, those are a little bit easier to go after. There’s, there’s a sense that amongst many of them that they don’t want to stick their. Head out, they don’t want to fund something that gets them in trouble, that looks bad for them or their trustees. So there’s certainly an angle there. But of course, you know, you go after an organization with a campaign that’s meant to denigrate what they do. Well, that also is meant to create a funding gap by basically shaming people from giving money to them within their own communities, you know. If they they do a good enough job, uh, making a community organization look like a villain, well, that certainly is going to impact their ability to fundraise amongst individuals too. So there’s bank shots involved here. There’s all sorts of different things where the idea here is to discredit and and defraud and to otherwise make it so that these organizations have a much harder time operating and being funded. All right, there, there’s, uh, going after the donors, whether institutional or funders, you, you, you have a broader term funders, also insidious, uh, there’s other, there are other methods of attack. Yeah, I, things like, um, investigations and and sometimes that’ll be by official sources, attorneys, states attorneys generals have been doing some of that, but also the third party organizations will have a quote unquote investigation of their own and and look into these types of things, you know, a fraud or abuse and and will publish their findings on such things. There’s also intimidation lawsuits as well that we’re starting to see against certain organizations, um, and that. Of course, you know, even if the lawsuit is meritless, um, that still costs the organization money to defend and effort and reputation and reputation. All of this works together against that chilling effect. And sometimes it’s multiple tactics that we’ve mentioned here before, sometimes it’s multiple organizations. It’s tag teaming together. All of these things are are are designed to discredit the. Organization reduce its standing in the community and eventually hope that it goes away. A prominent example, Acorn um was a target of Project Veritas years ago. And uh it it it ceased to exist eventually over over what we now know are largely false accusations or at least uh uh accusations that were much broader than anything that was actually going on within the entity. Some of these official investigations or other actions, um, the, the, the officers are, are working within their within their statutory authority, like a, like a state attorney general, and they’re, they’re authorized most maybe all state attorneys general’s offices have charities bureaus, so there’s, so there’s authority to do what they’re doing, but they’re, they’re doing it under color of authority. In but in a in a nefarious backhanded way. Yeah, and, and these are the ones that are the most politically motivated we tend to see, you know, the Missouri Attorney general recently sued media matters uh over what seems to be ludicrous types of of arguments. The interesting thing here and and in Texas is the Texas Attorney general has done this, Ohio has done as well. What’s interesting here and what’s difficult, what’s challenging here is is exactly what you said, Tony. These attorneys general are all empowered and have a great deal of of latitude for their investigative authority. And so when they make these pronouncements that are based often on weak records, questionable complaints, you know, they are not necessarily acting outside of the law. Now, I would argue that there is a line that they could cross where It would become problematic, but they have a great deal of latitude and authority to pursue these types of investigations and to eventually get into uh administrative complaints and some other types of things. And that’s what’s really tricky for this particular category is that there’s not a lot that you can do other than make sure that you’re and we’ll talk about this later, be prepared in advance, make sure you’re dotting your I’s and crossing your T’s and know that your compliance is right. And if this type of a thing comes after you, you’re going to have to defend it. It’s going to take time and it’s going to take money. But you know, if you feel confident that nothing is wrong, well, you can continue to work on the things that are making these attorney general attorneys general upset at you, um, and maybe have your revenge that way as you later on when or the the what I would argue potentially is a frivolous complaint would eventually get withdrawn. People abbreviate, you know, AGs, and I always think, no, it should be A. I know, but nobody’s gonna do. It’s attorneys general. I think there was a whole episode of the West Wing on this, yes. It doesn’t matter. It’s completely frivolous and doesn’t even deserve a footnote, but I don’t know, I just always think, no, it’s supposed to be ASG right um. What, what about the, I’ve seen press too about The possibility of uh False Claims Act liability when a nonprofit is accused of submitting a payment for to a government entity. And they are not complying with, you know, the latest executive order on DEI. And so now there’s, now there’s a statute that they’ve committed fraud when they request their next payment please explain, explain what’s the potential here. Yeah, I mean, I have to, I have to confess a lot of that is a little bit outside my lane of expertise, but I will say this. This is another example of a politically motivated use of the laws, um, in a way that is meant to cost an organization it’s standing, cost the organization actual money and time to defend. And whether or not there is any truth in those types of things, um, technical or otherwise, it doesn’t matter, I think, because again, this goes to that chilling effect. Uh, I think that the point of a lot of these intimidation lawsuits or enforcement actions or whatever they are, it’s not so much the substance of that individual action. The idea is to say, look at this organization here. You don’t want to be that organization, do you? Well, you better back off from your DEI program. You better make sure that you’re doing things that that uh don’t make you a target. Get out of. uh folks who are undocumented immigrants. You know, it, it is meant to intimidate, it is meant to chill, and that is honestly the real reason here. A whole host of the things that we’re seeing in the last few weeks since, since the inauguration. are of questionable constitutional value. Oh, there are a lot of things that, that, um, will ultimately, uh, potentially by courts be reversed. But the point is that here and now there’s this flood the zone method that’s happening right now. Try to make it seem like that there’s little hope that that the the the powers have turned and everybody is, is uh subject to the whims of a person or a group of people or a political party or whatever. And the idea is to chill and intimidate, and that is the real tactic here because so many of these things are probably not going to be considered legal at the end of the day when things are all said and done at the court level. That’s such an important point, Tim, that the, the, the purpose of a lot of this is intimidation, you know, discouragement. Oh, you know, there’s so much happening. Flood the zone is that, that goes back to Steve Bannon, uh, Trump’s, uh, adviser, particularly in the, in the, in the first, uh, presidency. That’s his, that’s his strategy, flood the, well, it’s the way I’ve seen him say it on his podcast, flood the zone with shit. Yeah, just overwhelm people, overwhelm the, the, the what, 200 and some executive orders within the first couple of days of the administration. That alone. But then, you know, everything compounded after that, the, the, the federal employment. Major upheavals, you know, veterans, the, the different agencies being, being targeted, you know, the latest is weather, the, the National Weather Service, for God’s sake, and NOAA, you know, uh, it’s all part of the strategy, so you need to, need to recognize that that a lot of, a lot of what’s happening is, is intended to have the effect that you don’t want it to have to put you off to just say I’m overwhelmed so I can’t pay attention to anything. And it’s, it’s, and, uh, uh, a couple of articles I’ve read on strategy and how to deal with this is just pick some things that are important to you, you know, you don’t need to doom scroll on your phone 12 hours a day now, you know, keep that to a minimum and especially not during right before you go to bed, but you know, pick some issues that are important to you and focus on those. Don’t let them. Defeat you with their strategy of flooding the zone to just overwhelm. And I think that one of the reasons why flooding the zone is so successful is that it, it, it’s the shiny silver object that takes you away from some of the bigger ticket things that are happening in the tax exempt space. I, I don’t have to tell you, but maybe the listeners will be interested in knowing that we’re now starting to see some things happen at Treasury and the IRS. And what that is going to do to impact tax exempt organizations and the exempt organization division within the IRS is an open question. right now. Um, but the, the IRS has been insulated since post-Watergate years, post Nixon from politics. And that seems to maybe be changing now. So, you know, on top of all of the things that we’re talking about, uh, there seems to be an attempt perhaps to distract from those types of things and and that um dosifying of treasury and the IRS that’s been in the news lately too. So, There’s a lot of really substantive things that are going on that are related to the topic that we’re talking about as well. Um, it’s all part of the the flood the zone that we’ve been mentioning here. Is there anything more you want to cover, uh, we haven’t talked about or maybe more detail on something uh in terms of the, the forms of attack? No, I think that that the biggest thing is that when it comes to the attacks, there, we’ve been talking a lot about PR attacks uh and that type of thing, but there’s also online attacks that that we’ve been seeing and, and I mentioned kind of the keyboard warrior situation, you know, there’s certainly an element of online attacks going after data. Bass and things along those lines as well. And and part of what we are recommending as part as part of our prep is to make sure that you’ve got, you know, good password protections and things like that, making sure that your online world is safe too. But you know, so much of what we do and how we do things are online these days that we’ve got to be really buttoned up in that area because that tends to be one of the big vectors that we end up seeing. It’s time for Tony’s Take two. Thank you, Kate. Especially now with all the attacks going on uh against our nonprofit community. Obviously the show today, devoted to that. I’m harkening back to our guest Miko Marquette Whitlock and his advice when he was last on the show. To follow your meds, your mindset, exercise, diet, and sleep, you know, mindset. Manage, manage yourself, you know, if, if you feel depression, you need to get help with that, not let it fester, you know, do things that are good for you mentally. Exercise, of course, taking just equal care of your physical body, uh, like you’re doing with uh with mindset, and you know what exercising is right for you. What it is that invigorates you, gets those endorphins going. All important diet. You know, the foods that are right for you, uh, doesn’t mean you can’t indulge now and then. But being careful, not, not, uh, overeating out of, out of stress. And sleep, getting adequate sleep. We’re all supposed to get between 7 and 8 hours for adults. Well, probably adults are listening to this. I don’t, I don’t think there are any children under 12, uh, listening to nonprofit radio, not likely, unless they’re future, uh, you know, aspiring nonprofit CEOs, maybe that could be or board members, maybe, maybe you have a 9 year old who aspires to be a nonprofit board member, could very well be, but, but if not, Uh, 7 to 8 hours recommended sleep, so please, uh, this. Important advice, particularly around challenging this challenging time from uh from Miko, mind your meds, the mindset, exercise, diet, and sleep. And that is Tony’s take too. Kate. Yeah, a little self-care moment never hurts. Get a mani pedi. That’s my, that’s my favorite like uh. Thing for me to take care of myself. Love going to get my hair done, little medi pedi that really like calms me down. I see. All right, so we have to modify I for indulgence indulgence mindset. Yes, meds for uh for our associate producer Kate. Maybe we can add an F in there too, so it’s like meds, so it’s like family and friends. Family and friends, that’s the different meds. OK, meds. All right. We’ve got Voco but loads more time. Here’s the rest of politically motivated attacks. Who, what and how with Tim Mooney. Let’s let’s go then to um. What we can do in advance, the point you made earlier that we don’t want to wait until someone comes after us, starts asking, well, you know, what we, we’re just asking questions. We’re, we’re just, we’re just asking questions about whether they’re in compliance. That’s all we’re doing. And if they’re not, we certainly want to find that out, but we won’t know if we don’t ask the question. And of course there’s no predicate to ask the question there’s no reasonable basis for asking the question, but we’re doing it. Um, alright, so in advance, in advance, what should we be doing? You’ve got some, we have plenty of time left together, you know, so what should we be doing now reviewing, making sure that we can, as I said, do the best we can, which is to just minimize the likelihood of, of success of an attack or maybe even stave off an attack. In advance. Yeah, I, I think that the most important thing that you can do first is know the narrative around your organization. You know, is there a common but false narrative about your activities, particularly from folks that are Opposed to your point of view. So are you uh uh uh a voting rights organization, you know, all the common narrative often for voting rights, particularly civil rights organizations, is, oh, they’re registering illegal voters, the common narrative. Um, if, if you are um with an organization that is, um, Interested in criminal justice reform, the the the concept of what defund the police means, and and and how that is impacted by your organization. Are you a civil rights organization working in the DEI space? Well, we all have heard about the, the, the, the narratives around that. So know your organization and know what the potential attacks are. What are those common but false narratives are. From That point, everything sort of opens up from there because when you know where those potential vulnerabilities are, what is, what are the narratives that tend to have resonance with folks that are false? That’s the good starting off point. And, and sometimes that’s as simple as just kind of opening up social media and looking at what the other side is saying about your stuff, um, and then kind of uh taking it from there. OK, be aware of what people say about you, what they may, including what’s what’s potentially false. Um, other stuff, you know, compliance related, you know, your organic documents, compliance, let’s let’s talk about that. I think compliance is a really important piece and it taps into a whole bunch of other things that you’ll want to do as well. You know, you’ve got to know what laws your organization is subject to. And and for for many organizations, that’s going to be starting off with federal tax law because that’s what sort of organizes us as tax exempt organizations. If you’re a public charity, as we mentioned before, you’re allowed to Engage in lobbying, you’re just limited in how much you can do. There are reporting requirements around your lobbying activity. This is a common area. Anytime that there’s any kind of limits or reporting requirements, especially for the type of work that you do, you’ve got to make sure that you know what those are. When you have to register, there’s a registration component and what your reporting obligations are and because often this will happen not just at the IRS level but also at the state and perhaps even local level as well. Um, you know, I’ve been talking about lobbying, but this could be something as simple as charitable solicitation registration, you know, are what are the rules in your state? Are you doing things outside of your state where you might be subject to those states charitable solicitation rules. All of these types of things are really important because if you are a a a small nonprofit and maybe you don’t have a lawyer on your board of directors or or somebody who really understands compliance in these types of things, but you’re you’re aiding um uh undocumented folks in your community and someone wants to come after your Well, they can just look at the charitable solicitation records and say, oh, look at this fraudulent organization that hasn’t registered and reported, you know, and that’s small potatoes comparatively, but that’s the kind of stuff that that you’ve got to be careful about. You want to make sure that compliance is a big part of what you do, especially if there are those common false narratives there. So you you do really want to make sure that that’s an important type of thing. Um, it also gets to the point with where the vectors come in. And often what will happen is that there will be attempts by organizations or investigators or whomever that will try to Interact with your staff or your volunteers. It may be a public event and start asking questions. We often call these odd questions or weird questions because they’re really trying to route uh the person that they’re talking to to quote unquote admit something. And so what you need to do there is this interface is on the compliance side but also on the training side as well. So say you’re an organization that’s doing uh nonpartisan get out the vote work. And that’s perfectly legal. It’s perfectly legal under all sorts of different, different uh rules and regulations. But if you have a volunteer and someone comes up and says, oh, thanks for doing this uh nonpartisan event, but really you’re here to register people in this one party, right? What are they trying to do? They’re trying to get that person to, to, uh, you know, trip up and admit those types. This is the Veritas. It’s that right now but it could be an official official investigation as well. Um, you know, the idea here is, OK, you gotta make sure that anybody that’s public facing has got to understand that, you know, just because someone comes up and is friendly and is asking questions and maybe asks the question over and over again just to elicit a response. That, you know, you’ve got a responsibility to represent the organization, right? And the organization on the other hand, needs to make sure that those folks are trained. And so we’ve got a whole host of a variety of different recommendations for that type of a thing. But most importantly is that you’ve got a, a point person at any given public event where if that volunteer feels like they’re getting a little browbeat with these questions that they know they can say, hey, I don’t know the answer to your question. I’m gonna go get Suzie over there and come and talk to you. That, that’s the kind of stuff that you that that puts the separation between that type of a thing. Now, is every single person asking these types of questions a part of some Project Veritas or a state attorney general investigation? Of course not. But at the same time, these are the types of things that you want to do from a best practices perspective, to make sure that you’re buttoned up, to make sure that you’re Organization not only is doing the things legally, but doesn’t get tripped up by bad actors with bad intentions to say something that makes it look like, especially with some creative editing, that you’re acting contrary to how you’re actually acting. We need to be more vigilant now, more, more more conscious of, of the potential for the the kinds of Well, you know, um, bad actors, whether they’re official or unofficial, uh, being out there lurking, you know, trying to, trying to, trying to set us up, trying to trap us. We, we need to be more aware than we did a year ago. I don’t know about you, Tony, but I, I was a big Spider-Man comic book fan and cartoon fan when I was younger. Well, actually I still am, but just between you and me. I’m a big fan of my spidey sense, you know, if you don’t, if you’re not familiar with Spider-Man, if you’re a listener, Spider-Man has this unique superpower where if something is bad is happening, if he’s about to get hit by a villain or if somebody has launched a missile at him or something along those lines, he gets a little tingle and in the comics it’s these little lines over his head. I think we all have that in some way, shape or form. Our instincts are usually pretty good. If your spidey sense is going off, you know, it might be good to listen to that, especially in the context that I’ve been talking about, um, you know, it’s, uh, our instincts are pretty finely honed in those areas and it’s pretty good to listen to those two. A couple of weeks ago we had Gene Takagi on and uh he was talking about, and I’m sure you know Gene. Oh yeah, absolutely, yeah, he’s our legal contributor. He was talking about uh compliance with your own organic documents, your own originating documents, your, your bylaws, uh, uh, your, even your mission statement. Gene talked about it, but it’s been a few weeks and it’s important, so I’d like you to. Uh, you’ll you’ll end up amplifying what Gene said about compliance with your own documents, please. Gene’s one of the smartest lawyers in the biz, so shout out to Gene. You need to make sure as a function of state law, that you are complying with your nonprofit corporation laws. One of the many different ways that comes into play is when you tell the state, because you’re getting a deal from the state by by registering as a nonprofit corporation, and that It means you’ve got to operate in a particular way. You’ve got to have a certain number of board members. They’ve got to be operating in a particular way. You have to make sure you’re complying with that state statute around that. And your articles of incorporation are talking about the, the methods that you’re going to engage in and the type of topics that you’re going to be uh working under. But then your bylaws are really going to dig into the details and very often organizations will have bylaws that they haven’t looked at in decades. And they no longer follow them. The board meeting minutes are done differently. Um, they don’t operate with the same type of procedures that their bylaws and maybe even their articles uh require. Uh, and it’s critically important that you’re following those types of things because if you don’t, then you are likely in some type of breach of the laws around the nonprofits within your state, and that is something that could be potentially a. But it’s certainly something that could at least again be highlighted, you know, oh, look at this organization, it’s supposed to have um uh open meetings for its members and they haven’t done that since 1978. Look, there, there, there’s, it’s a scofflawer organization, or if you’ve got an attorney general who is particularly disinclined to like your organization, they will certainly like to dig into what your procedures are. Are you following your articles of incorporation? Are you following your bylaws? Are you in breach? I talked about uh charitable solicitation rules. There’s a whole host of different things. There are taxable events for some tax exempt organizations from time to time. You’re not necessarily exempt across the board in some states. Are you in compliance with those filings? So making sure again that you know what your exposure is, what your obligations are, and especially the calendaring of those obligations. File on time, don’t file late. If, uh, you change your activities, and that’s subject to another law, you know, election-related activity is often one of these types of things. Are you getting involved in a ballot measure? You may have registration requirements because you’re participating in a ballot measure as a charitable organization. It’s totally fine. It counts as lobbying, but under state and local rules, you may have to register and report. Separately on top of that, you gotta make sure you’re doing that and if you’re not, you could be subject to fines, you could be subject to other types of actions by the state or local law. And so these are the types of of angles that could be taken on the official level, but also outside of, of, of the official enforcement agencies to try to Embarrass and to denigrate and to show to funders. Funders do not like it, do not care for organizations that are not following the laws. So you know, highlighting these things for organizations that work in subject matter areas that we’ve already talked about, um, to try to get them to lose standing in their community, standing in their funders, that’s all part of the game plan here and that’s why it’s important that you got to make sure what your obligations are and follow them. Tim, what are the limits, uh, that bolder advocacy can take? I mean, you, you said your attorneys, but you’re not, uh, we’re not, we’re attorneys, we’re not your attorney. But what, what types of questions around what we were just talking about, could, can you field or or maybe even not field what would go over the, over the, the boundary? Yeah, the line is, you know, since we’re not, we do not have. Attorney-client relationship, we don’t give legal advice and the and it’s a fine line between technical assistance and legal advice, but essentially what we can do is we can help explain what the rules are. If it gets to something that’s more specific, you know, where an organization is asking a very specific question and asking for essentially more of an opinion than what the law says, that’s where we start getting Into the legal advice uh perspective. And that’s where we’ll kind of, you know, say, well, um, this, this is the line we can’t cross, but this is a good time to tell you, you should retain local counsel to be able to properly answer that question. I think the thing that we do really well is most of the questions that we get, we can answer, the vast majority I would say. When it gets to the point where someone is asking for legal advice, we can help them get to the point where they can have that conversation with their lawyer, whether it’s their internal lawyer or external counsel, and sort of fast forward them a little bit in the conversation, maybe save them a few bucks, and that’s, that’s kind of one of the big reasons. Why we were founded all those years ago, why I think we’ve been supported by a lot of organizations and by, of course, a lot of private foundations as well, because we’re able to give that kind of service within the boundaries of what we’re able to provide, um, and to serve the broader nonprofit community that way. Thank you. All right. Um, let’s talk about data security. You mentioned it, uh, you mentioned it briefly earlier, but now in our discussion of how to protect yourself, data security, personally identifiable information, etc. Yeah, it’s interesting, you know, I, I’m of a certain age where I was around before the internet, and I remember time before the internet and you know, I think that those of us who are sort of in our age range, you’re not the only one in this conversation you go Gen X’s right, yeah, yeah, you know, I mean, we, we came in with the idea of, oh, you’re going to put your credit card into that machine and it’s gonna, you know, give you a book later that gets. Delivered well, that’s strange, you know, and then we eventually got comfortable with all those things and, and I think that a lot of folks who are a little bit younger than us, uh just got were thrown into the world where, you know, oh yeah, of course you share your your your personal information on the internet in your social media accounts and things like that. And so I think what we’re seeing is a retrenchment of that a little bit that maybe we don’t necessarily need to put absolutely everything out there. And the reason why is that our individual act activities as say employees of a nonprofit organization are sometimes used to suggest that the nonprofit is doing things that it shouldn’t do. So, on my own personal time, on my own dime, I can support a candidate of my choice. I can’t do that in my role as senior counsel for Alliance for Justice. It’s a 501c3. We don’t do that. We don’t support candidates out of that, out of the C3. But these malicious actors will often try to Cherry pick and and and and take that information that’s sort of out there and create a a a feeling that, oh, that organization is just full of people that all they want to do is see this this person elected or that person defeated. All you have to do is look at their social media posts, and that’s the kind of stuff that we often see is that conflation. And of course the traditional stuff, the cyber attacks, the hacking, the phishing, I mean, I can’t tell you how many times I have gotten an email where it’s very clear a text even today, where it’s it’s enormously clear that it’s a phishing attack, but we do training internally and I have um thought of myself as a very smart person who will never get caught in a fishing attack and one of our training um uh. Thats absolutely caught me, absolutely caught me. Why did they say? I I even have my prop for this. It was, it was, it was months ago before these came in. We have a new swag for those of you who are on the video, you might be able to say we have swag for our, our organization now. So frontline, front line of democracy? Yeah, front lines of democracy on the front lines of democracy FJ.org, really great sweatshirt, very excited for these things. Well, we were, we We got a faux phishing attack that basically said, oh, put in click here to put in your size, and they got me on that one. So phishing attacks can, and this was I can’t emphasize enough, this was a test, just to show how often these types of things can really dig in and look legit when they really aren’t. So do those do those internal trainings, know what’s what’s coming after you. Uh, have your complex passwords, make sure that they get a reset every couple of months or whatever is kind of best practices, two-factor authentication, all that kind of stuff. If someone nefarious gets into your database, they, they, they’ve got so many opportunities to wreck you, to lock things up, or to make things to plan things perhaps. And then make it look like that you’re doing things that you’re not. It’s a really, really pernicious type of a thing. So making sure that you’ve got good hygiene for your own personal online type of things. Um, and doxing, of course, is another type of a situation that that we’ve been seeing as well. And, and you know, we’re seeing a movement, I think, again, to start to retrench how much personal stuff that we put out there. But it is remarkable. How much information, individual personal information is out there, you know, if your password, for instance, is, uh, your, your favorite sports team’s most recent championship, and as a Buffalo Bills fan, I do not have that, so I can use that as an example. Um, you know, and, and you know, that’s the type of thing it’s like, oh, well, that person is a big Philadelphia Eagles fan. Well, if it’s Eagles and then the date of their most recent Super Bowl win, you know. Trust me, they’re gonna try those types of things. Um, you know, that’s the kind of stuff that that that we’ll see that is sort of these attacks to get in, but also the doxing element of, of things when we learn you can learn where people live and have protests in front of their house and things along those lines and then release that information uh out into the general public with an intent to create harm or at least um discomfort for that person. All of this stuff is, is out there, and it’s stuff that we’ve got to be mindful about because, you know, when you sign up to work for a nonprofit organization, you’re, you’re not signing up to be, you know, on the. Front page of The New York Times or to necessarily be be subject to the whims of some of these types of personal attacks, but we do see that, um, we, we’ve seen, um, election officials, local election officials, um, get, get doxed and and harassed online. And, and, and this is the type of of attack that we’re seeing. It’s, it’s to the organization, but it’s narrowed down to the personal. And so making sure that you’ve got uh your Your individual um online home buttoned up a little bit more, um, think about how much you want to be out there. That’s, that’s another thing as well. And your CRM database, um, and, and so in light of all this, uh, talk about data security, I want to remind listeners that that same show a few weeks ago where we had Gene, we also had Amy, uh, Sample Ward, our technology contributor, and she gave a very good explanation of managing your data, making sure you’re not saving data that you don’t need. That’s personally identifiable and could be compromised. So that’s all in the episode called Prudence in our political environment just a couple of weeks ago. Yeah, retention policies, all of that. Make sure that’s all buttoned up. Um, there’s a lot of best practices out there and a lot of resources that are out there to allow you to not have to reinvent the wheel on this kind of stuff. Whistleblower protection, another one, another one, what about, uh, openness and transparency with our, with our funders whether again institutional or, or individual, as a, as a method of again protecting ourselves, you know, being open about and truthful about what our work is maybe part of that is defeating false narratives that may be out there or could, uh, that aren’t out there or could be out there, but just open this with our, our, our funding community. When you are attacked, the instinct is to, oh, we’ve got, we’ve got to huddle up and we’ve got to keep this quiet. I, I, I think that our advice is kind of the exact opposite as, as you’re suggesting here. We need to make sure that we’re being open when a false attack comes at us. We need to make sure that we tell our allies, our community, and indeed our funders what’s going on, and the reason why is. There’s copycat attacks, so we’re going to help prevent that by getting that out there, but we’re also going to be open about what’s going on. And in doing that, you are huddling up more broadly, not just internally, but more broadly with your allies, with your community, with your funders, because they are on your side. And you know, an attack against one is really in a sense an attack against all, um, from, from my perspective at least. And so what that does is it will help. Everybody within your coalition and your funding community understand what is happening and what may be coming. And there may be an opportunity that comes out of this attack rather than just the cost of the, the attack, and the cost of course can be time and money and and and opportunities, but you know, if it is easily revealed that there is a, a political animus behind this type of a thing. This might be something that actually gets a broader attention and there there could be a backlash against that attack and that might actually end up being, it’s never good to be attacked, but it might be in the long run, a positive thing because what you’re doing is you’re showing the tactics of this other side that are negative and unethical and spurious, and that they’re doing it because you’re succeeding in doing things. that they don’t like. And that just doubles down on all of that and may ultimately mean more support, ultimately when all of a sudden done. But that doesn’t happen unless you got a plan, you are good on your compliance, you’ve trained your staff, and you’re ready for the types of attacks that are based on the false narratives that you should know about just by being active in your field. You said that you believe an attack against one is an attack against all. Um, I believe that the nonprofit community. is much stronger when we all stand together. And protect any one of us under threat or any segment of us under threat and that whether that’s a mission that we believe in or it’s one that we find antithetical to our to our being, but there’s still a 501c3 and they’re part of the community and they’re under attack and you never know when the attack may point toward you. So I leave with the, the, the strength of the community when it stays together. The, the attacks often are not are ideological, but I, I, I think that you’re exactly right. This should span ideology. The the the the the nonprofit community is strong because we represent our communities and, you know, An attack against a nonprofit is an attack against a real pillar within our communities broadly and, and, and it’s a bummer that this tends to have political ramifications to it. It shouldn’t. The tax exempt organizations span ideology. They serve communities, they’re charitable, they’re educational, they’re scientific. They, they, they shouldn’t, they shouldn’t be subject to those political whims. And and and I’m I’m saddened that that this is the latter part of my career been that type of a thing. But you’re absolutely right that By going after these types of entities, it’s really trying to hobble one of the important legs of a stool of what our communities are built on. And, and, you know, I think that Nonprofits are critically important in our communities and by going after them in any way, shape or form, really is taking a hatchet to Good things and good people and good ideas and to do it over the sense of ideology is a really sad thing to me. Tim, thanks for sharing all your advice, advice from Alliance for Justice. Thank you very much. Thank you. You’ll find the Alliance at AFJ.org and there you’ll find the important Boulder advocacy half of the alliance. You’ll find Tim, he’s at Tim Mooney on BlueSky and also on LinkedIn and Tim, thank you again. Thanks so much, Tony. I really appreciate it. Next week, great value in sustainable giving. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great. There’s one sentence I need you to reread. In the politically motivated tax block, uh, you said. You need to know who is a potential target of the attack. So we need a tax, so why don’t you just say that sentence. That starts, you need to know.

Nonprofit Radio for March 3, 2025: Julia Campbell On Social Media

Julia CampbellJulia Campbell On Social Media

The social media maven returns to share her thinking and advice on short form video; ads; working within algorithms; content moderation; and, privacy policies. Let’s talk about X; Facebook; LinkedIn; Bluesky; Instagram; YouTube; and, TikTok. Julia is a nonprofit social marketing consultant.

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d be stricken with acute glomerulonephritis if I had to drink in the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer Kate with what’s going on. Hey Tony, we’ve got. Julia Campbell on social media. The social media maven returns to share her thinking and advice on short form video ads, working within algorithms, content moderation, and privacy policies. Let’s talk about X, Facebook, LinkedIn, Blue Sky, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok. Julia is a nonprofit social marketing consultant. On Tony’s take 2. You’re listening to a top 10 podcast. Barely We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. Here is Julia Campbell on social media. What a joy to welcome someone back who has been here several times. It’s always a pleasure. Named as a top thought leader and one to follow by Forbes and LinkedIn for nonprofits and one of the 30 nonprofit IT influencers to follow in 2025. Julia Campbell is a wealth of knowledge when it comes to designing social media and storytelling strategies that help nonprofits share their mission across the digital landscape. You’ll find Julia on LinkedIn. You’ll find her practice at JComarketing.com. JC, welcome back to nonprofit Radio. Thank you, TM. It’s so great to be back. The pod. I love it. Oh, thank you. Yeah, people get a kick out of that. I do too. I, I could get a shirt maybe give out the NTC this year. All right. It’s good to see you. We’re in a, uh, an interesting, um, sort of digital landscape time. Uh, the, the new administration sucks a lot of oxygen out of the world. Uh, just right before we came on, I got another New York Times headline. Uh, the, the first word was Trump. I got a headline that Zuckerberg is eliminating all of his charitable foundation DEI initiatives right before we got on, so. Just lovely headlines all around. Yeah, it’s fantastic uh headed in a dastardly uh in an awful direction. What are you hearing from folks? What are you advising folks, uh, you know, you’re the, the, uh, social media maven. What are you talking about? I mean, social media has really been challenging in terms of strategy for several years now just because of the way the algorithms have shifted and the way that organic reach has completely plummeted, and you do need, you know, you need to invest in ads. Ads, but the problem right now that we’re seeing, at least for a lot of the organizations I work with and the students I have and my clients, is the struggle between, are these companies ethical, which we know that they’re not. And how can we balance our need to be seen and create community and get our word out there and educate people and talk about these causes and build movements? How can we balance that that with the fact that Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, and, you know, a lot of these companies that own these social media platforms are bowing down to the administration and then are also actually really, you know, being very shoddy in terms of content moderation and data privacy. So that’s the bigger picture that I’m seeing, and it even goes beyond just how do we get more engagement, because that’s just the Scratching the surface. So, what I’ve been advising people, I really am saying, you know, you really need to take stock. I don’t think that leaving everything and closing up shop and washing our hands of social media is really the answer, because then we kind of leave it to Um, the void to be filled with misinformation and, um, you know, we really need to still be creating our movements and showcasing our causes there. But we do need to have some serious reflection on how we’re using these platforms. Do we want to pay for ads? Do we want to continually be giving money to these billionaires. I mean, it’s really a fraught landscape right now along with everything going on just in the political sphere and the fundraising landscape and philanthropy. But the marketing, digital marketing sphere is constantly shifting and it’s just like tidal waves of bad information coming at us. It’s pretty overwhelming. Let’s try to break down some of the overwhelm, so, so people don’t feel that bad about it. Maybe just, maybe just a burdened but not overwhelmed. If we can if we can reduce from overwhelmed to to slight burden, that would be. And we tend to be very thoughtful about where we put our time. Nonprofits are very thoughtful and intentional. I mean, you know, Target’s not going to get off Facebook. They don’t care, right? They just don’t care. But the American Red Cross really might. be considering, should we get off Twitter because or X because of all of these factors. So, I think it’s a unique position that social change organizations are in. Well, you’ve, you’ve left X. You, you left X when Elon Musk bought it, uh, but you’re, you’re on LinkedIn. So, right. So how do we, you know, so how do we in the small and mid-size shops think through where, where to be and where to just, you know, place that pin that says we’re no longer here, find us on Blue Sky or, you know, whatever. How, how do we think through that? We have to really evaluate where our audiences and what we’re trying to achieve, but then also figure out where is the line that will not be crossed. So, It’s very personal, and it has to, there’s not a one size fits all that’s gonna work for every organization. If your organization relies on fast-paced news, getting things out in a timely manner, connecting with journalists, then X is probably the place for you. You know, I would never recommend if you’re getting great traction and you are accomplishing your mission. And you’re getting the word out and building a community. I would never recommend leaving a platform altogether, but we really need to evaluate is our audience still there? Are the people that we wanna talk to still here? And are we able to reach them? Maybe they’ve migrated over to different platforms and what are our strengths and weaknesses? So. You know, people ask me all the time, should we be on TikTok? Should we be using Instagram reels, and should we be doing short form video? And the short answer, of course, is yes, because that’s the most powerful kind of content right now on across social media. But if you don’t have video content, then potentially building a thought leadership blog on LinkedIn could work. Maybe going to substack, maybe going to Blue sky, maybe creating infographics and putting them on Pinterest. I mean, there’s all sorts of ways that we can be using these different platforms. And also for me, you know, I, I can’t be Amish as much as I would love to. You know, I have an iPhone. I don’t like Apple. I have Google accounts. I don’t like Google. It’s just, it’s sort of like I, I would love to live in a cabin in the woods and Not have the internet. I, I actually wouldn’t, but we have to understand that we can only do what we can do, and I think our messages are so important to get out to the public, to the community, especially with so much mis and disinformation and confusion going on, that if we’re going to leave a platform where our audience is going to miss us and be craving this information, I think that that’s That’s just a bad, that’s a bad thing to do. So if, if you have a Facebook page, a Facebook group, if you have an Instagram account, and you know you’re really reaching people there and you’re helping people, and you’re helping people understand the cause and the issue, we have to think and reflect on what will be lost if you leave. You said short form video is now the most popular kind of Instagram and TikTok. Wait, you’re valuable things, but I’m, I was, I was trying to wrap up. So again, where the best places are. YouTube shorts. And Instagram reels, um, and TikTok. And TikTok is not going to get banned under this administration, I don’t think so. If you have a TikTok account, don’t, don’t worry about it. I think you’ll be fine. OK, so let’s let’s drill down a little on short form video. What’s your, what’s your advice there? Like length, caption or not? I, I guess that’s yes, but what’s your advice around short form video? My advice, if you’ve never done short form video, go follow candid.org on every platform. Uh, they are an organization. They do not have kittens or dogs or kids or landscapes or anything that would be like a sexy kind of cause. They are just putting videos out that are helpful information, but they’re doing it in a catchy way, like a catchy, entertaining way. So it’s very important for first of all, to have a purpose for the video. Like why would I watch it, but also to have that hook that’s gonna hook me within the 1st 3 or 4 seconds. So what’s the question you’re asking? Maybe there’s a statistic that you’re sharing. Maybe it’s an anecdote of something that happened. Maybe it’s something surprising that you found. Maybe it’s like, oh, this happened in the news, but guess what? You don’t know the real story. Like, what is the hook around this video? And there has to, it has to be a very singular specific focus for the video. Also, authenticity reigns supreme. Nonprofit professionals often do not like to get at their phone. And take video of themselves. We want to sit in our office, we want to do our work, put our heads down. We don’t want to be the face of the organization, but people like to see faces. They like to hear from people. So as much as you can be authentic and be conversing around relevant real-time topics that are timely, that’s really going to accelerate your connection with your audience. It’s going to build trust and that’s gonna create more engagement for you. Awesome. All right, all valuable advice. And so candid.org doing short films they’re fantastic. Malala Fund, Malala Fund, I follow, they’re a little bit more polished. And I think that’s fine as well. That’s just their brand. Candid.org is a little, they’re, they do great videos, but they’re not as polished. It’s much more just a staff member answering a question about like where do I find grant proposals or how do I talk to a board member about a touchy subject. It’s really helpful information for nonprofits. I also recommend really following like the New York Public Library. I mean, there’s all sorts of Nonprofits, organizations doing fantastic work with short form video. Invisible people. Mark Korvath um runs Invisible people. They do a lot of YouTube shorts. They are, they just film people talking and their stories. They do storytelling and that’s their purpose, and that’s what they. That’s what they share. So, sort of find your, your purpose. Like, why are you sharing videos? What are the topics that your audience would be interested in? And then I recommend just watching a lot of reels and TikTok videos. So you kind of get the feel for how they should be structured and the feel for what works, um, before you really jump off on your own. But, you know, done is better than perfect. I always think that. Oh, very good. Uh, a lot of people say don’t let perfect be the enemy of good, but is that’s, that’s well put. Done is better than done is better than perfect. All right, excellent. I knew you, yes, well, there’s no question you’re the right person to help us through this. I hope so. I I struggle as well. Oh, you do? Yeah. Yes, of course. What do you struggle with? I, I struggle with creating short form video. It’s challenging because I’m so used to recording webinars or recording podcasts or doing long form videos, putting it on YouTube, um, you know, putting it on my website, putting it on my blog, but this constant, you know, this constant need to feed the beast of social media. It it can get challenging. Um, and then, of course, I know I work with my clients and the features are constantly changing, and what’s working is constantly changing. So, for me, I really, I Um, grapple with shiny object syndrome just as much as the next person, and thinking like, oh maybe I should be doing more on Blue Sky, or maybe I should be on Mastodon, or maybe I should be on whatever the next new social media platform is. But for me, what helps me is just knowing where my audience is, knowing where my strengths are, knowing what I like to do. And, you know, if I don’t put out a video every day, every week, just really trying hard not to beat myself up about it and doing what I can do, and quality over quantity has always been my mantra on social media, because you can, you can’t beat the internet on clutter. You can’t beat the internet on like AI sludge that’s just generated from an app, but you can beat the internet on authenticity and storytelling, which I think nonprofits, that’s our big strength. That’s like our superpower. Quality not quantity, but done is better than perfect. Exactly. Do not, if you’re spending all day doing 1 62nd Instagram reel, no, that’s too much. That’s way too much. Uh, that’s way too much time to spend. And really just getting it out there and it’s gonna give you that data that you need. So the more you do it, the more data you get, the more you see what people like, what people comment on, what people are sharing, what they’re watching. You can see how long they’ve watched it. You can see, oh, this question works better than this one, or I’m outside, and that tends to work better than inside. So the more you do it, it’s like the more data points you have for what’s working. I’m gonna give a shout out to the woman who does my video reels, uh, which, which, which we use on, uh, we post on Instagram and uh and YouTube. Her name, her name is Judith George. Amazing. Uh, she’s the video, I think she calls herself the video whisperer or the video content whisperer. Judith. She’s excellent, excellent. So I always believe in outsourcing to people. Like I don’t edit my own podcast because it’s not my zone of genius. That’s not where my Talents lie. So I would never, and that is the enemy of getting things done, I think, is because we think we have to do every single thing ourselves. But outsourcing to a video editor, I mean, these people are incredibly talented and they know exactly what they’re doing. So I, I love that idea and I wish more nonprofits would get more into, more comfortable with outsourcing some things so they’re not spending all day editing a video. You and I have talked about this before that it it’s just worthwhile to pay experts to do something that you’re not expert in that is gonna take you a long time to learn and get good at. You may as well just bring in someone from the outside who’s already got the expertise they hit the ground running and, and you’re unburdened having to learn a new skill. Yeah, and you can focus on your superpower, your zone of genius, which is storytelling, which is program management, which is fundraising, which is creating fabulous marketing campaigns and messages, talking to donors. I mean, I just think spending, I, because I’m running my social media for social good academy right now is the time of this recording, and everyone struggles with time management because they have 10,000 other things on their plate. And I think There’s no way for a development director to be able to master 10 social media platforms and create 10 videos every week. That’s just, I don’t see how that’s possible, as well as doing grant writing and donor management and cultivation and stewardship and things like that. So, I, I agree we need to start thinking, we need to take social media more seriously and stop tacking it on. To other people’s job descriptions and really think like, no, it’s time. It takes a lot of time, creativity, effort. You also have to measure what you’re doing. You have to be on top of the trends. You have to have your finger on the pulse of what’s going on in the cause and the industry and the organization. You have to think like a journalist. There’s all sorts of skills that you need to have. And I really think digital marketing, I mean, it’s 2025. Like, let’s let’s treat it seriously. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s DonorBox, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs, helping you, help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now back to Julia Campbell on social media. Let’s talk about ads. Uh, you mentioned, you know, is it worth spending money on ads, or, you know, uh, is the platform one that you want to even pay because you might have basic objections to, to their management or their policies or their algorithms, but you still want to be there. What, what do we think through about whether ads are worthwhile? I do think that putting some money towards social media advertising and Google ads. That’s definitely worth it depending on your goals. So a lot of organizations say, we’re the best kept secret. No one’s heard of us, no one knows who we are, no one can find our website. OK, well that would maybe require either applying for the Google ad grants, which um I’m certainly not an expert in, but I can, I can touch on it. I mean, there are so many experts out there on the Google ad grant, but it’s basically money that Google will give you. You have to manage it well. But to um promote it’s up to 10,000 dollars a month. Yes, you do have to, you have to manage it. I mean, you have to hit certain benchmarks to continue getting the $10,000 a month. You do have to get people to click on your ads. You have to get people to actually take action. Google has to see that your ads are worthwhile, they’re not clickbait. Um, those kinds of things. But you can also just pay for Google Ads. I mean, there’s nothing stopping you from just once in a while if you have a gala or if you have a really important marketing campaign for Domestic Violence Awareness Month or Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month, and you have some resources on your website you want people to find. Paying for search engine ads can definitely be a great way to do that. I always recommend, when you are considering paying for ads, really understand what the return on investment is worth to you. So, a very simple example, I worked with an organization, a local organization here. They were having a golf tournament. They spent $50 on a Facebook ad. And the return on investment for them in terms of golf tournament signups was $5000. So that’s a pretty good return on investment, right? So, then they can say, OK, well, we’re definitely going to run this ad again, um, this is part of now of our budget. That’s a very simplified way to do it. A lot of ads I see, you can’t necessarily track it like that. It might be awareness, it might be video views, maybe you’re driving people to your website, but as much as you can say, OK, we spent $500 on this ad, and this is what we got in return, and we can quantify it and we can say, OK, this was a really good investment. Uh, that’s what I think we lose when we boost a post or we just sort of throw money at an ad and then we never look to see what happened, and we never look to see, oh, did anyone take action? Did anyone sign up? Did anyone make a donation? We just sort of throw money at the problem and make Mark Zuckerberg richer, which he doesn’t need to be richer. And then we never figure out if it actually moved the needle at the end of the day. So we should be measuring as well. Absolutely, absolutely. This is the thing that that I think is so interesting about nonprofits and digital marketing. When we send out an annual appeal letter, you better believe we know exactly how much we paid for printing, for postage to send it out, and we know exactly how much we got back. But when we write a blog post or post on LinkedIn, we don’t track. Did anyone read it? Did anyone comment? Did anyone share it? Did we get emails? Did we get phone calls? Like what actually happened when we put this other piece of content out in the world? And the irony is that it’s so much easier to track on digital. You can instantly see, and I know Tony, you do reels, you can see within the 1st 30 seconds of posting a reel if it’s gonna work or not. And same on TikTok. There’s instant data that you can get to see, oh this is gonna work, I should do more of this. Uh, this is, you know, kind of falling flat, and then maybe why is this falling flat, time of day, maybe the sound is bad, like the topic isn’t interesting. But we get all of these points of data from digital marketing, and we, we tend to just not look at them. So we’re just constantly throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks, and wasting time and spinning our wheels. So, measurement, analysis, improvement, that should be a huge piece of any social media or any digital marketing plan. You mentioned earlier on, uh, content moderation policies. Oh yeah, what are we, what’s your, what’s your beef there? This is really screwing over nonprofits. It’s really painful for a lot of organizations, especially if they use certain keywords. Now I’m kind of concerned. Well, there’s two ways to think about it. Content moderation in terms of X. There’s no content moderation. You can say anything, do anything, post anything, and it’s the wild west, cause there’s zero content moderation there. But then there’s also overly moderating on Facebook and Instagram, specifically, political and social issues. And if you’re posting certain words, especially actually if you’re using paid ads, you will be blocked if you are a social justice organization. We’re seeing this a lot, and they don’t have to answer to anybody. They can just say your ad is blocked. We’re not running your ad. I’ve seen this for um a local food bank that got their ad blocked for no reason. It’s not wasn’t a political ad. It wasn’t, it didn’t have anything to do with a political issue, but everything’s political, I guess now. But Their ad was blocked for no reason. So that’s something really important to understand you don’t need to say it violates our. They don’t need to tell you anything. They’re completely in control, and that’s the other problem. So sometimes they’ll say, oh this this falls into Like, you have to read the fine print of what’s allowed in ads really carefully. So, look up all of the specific terms, look up, um, you know, what they say they allow and what they say they don’t allow. But of course, really at the end of the day, it is the platforms, it’s the platform’s prerogative to allow you to run an ad. The other thing is, Instagram has specifically come out and said that they are going to They’re going to, um, I don’t know what it’s called, like demote political and sensitive issue content because they want their feed to be much more focused on like influencers and celebrities and fashion and happy things. And for a lot of us, I mean, I follow the HRC, I follow the ACLU, I follow so many organizations that are overtly political, and I want to know this news, and I want to hear what they have to say. Um, I’m seeing them in my feeds, but I know that a lot of people. They are saying that they’re seeing less of that kind of content because the, you know, the algorithm overlords are determining what we see and what we don’t see. It’s really true. This is why people love TikTok. TikTok is actually ironically much more of a democracy in terms of the feed, and it’s a lot easier to discover new things, and it’s a lot easier to see things that you actually like, just because TikTok has the business model where they want to show you things that you want to see. So, they’re not trying to overly police what you see. So, it’s just interesting. Each platform is so, so different in that way. What are you seeing on LinkedIn? LinkedIn, I, I really have been enjoying LinkedIn. So, LinkedIn for me though, I’m not seeing a lot of new people post. I’m seeing a lot of Um, my friends, my colleagues, you know, other consultants, people that work in nonprofits, because the LinkedIn algorithm, of course, if I comment on something or like something, if I’m connected to somebody, then they’re more likely to show me that post. I feel like LinkedIn for me, I, I don’t know how to get out of it. I might need to just expand into following some brand new people, but it’s a little bit of an echo chamber for me right now. I love it though. I am learning a lot of new things and I actually finding out a lot of news on LinkedIn, and a lot of articles and statistics and things about fundraising and philanthropy that I, I didn’t know. I follow the National Council for nonprofits for all my news around the federal funding freeze and what people can do to combat those kind of executive orders. So, but I am finding it’s harder to discover new people on LinkedIn, but that’s probably just the way that I’ve been using it. In my own little kind of bubble, um, for safety, really like for mental health reasons. Um, but I love, I think LinkedIn is a very vibrant place for nonprofits to showcase thought leadership, to build relationships with donors and board members, um, and other, you know, fundraising professionals. Yeah, I’ve been consciously following new folks a week. Yeah, so my strategy is, uh, I look at folks who make smart comments on It’s usually other people’s posts, uh, I, because I guess I’m not sure other people are doing what I’m suggesting because most of the people who comment on my posts tend to be the same, you know, there are certainly exceptions, but that’s not, that’s not where I’m finding new people to follow. I’m looking at comments on other people’s posts and saying, oh, that’s a savvy comment, you know, so click, you click the, the little, the person’s little head. And it goes to their profile and you can decide if you want, you wanna send an invitation to uh to connect. I guess I said. I love that. So yeah, you could be, it’s it’s just a proactive. I do a week. And so that it’s strategic and it’s proactive, and I want everyone listening to really embrace those two words because that is How you succeed on social media by being strategic and proactive. We can’t continue to just be reactive. We can’t continue to just post on LinkedIn or post on Facebook and then throw our hands up and say, oh well, nobody commented. We need, and Tony, you do this really a lot. Commenting on other people’s posts, thoughtful comments, interaction. That is what drives engagement and that’s how you get seen. We are not, you know, Taylor Swift, like Taylor Swift. Has 250 million followers on Instagram and doesn’t follow anybody. OK, we, we can’t do that. We have to actually go out there and find relevant people to follow and build our network proactively. So I love that you said that because I think that’s so important. Proactive and strategic. Mhm. Yes, I would love that. Well, quantity is better than perfect. Yes, that’s valuable. It’s time for Tony’s Take two. Thank you, Kate. You are listening, as you listen to nonprofit radio to a top 10. Best fundraising podcast. That is thanks to an organization called Million Podcasts. They put out their list of 100 best fundraising podcasts and squeaking in. At right at number 10. Is Tony Martignetti nonprofit Radio. Thank goodness we’re not number 11 because what, what would I say? We’re a top 11. What is that? Ah, that’s like sad tromboneswamp wap, top 11, you so. Top 10, no, we’re not top 11 or anything below. We are top 10, barely squeaked in. So I’m very grateful to a million podcasts for their, their list, and it is, it is a valuable list of 100 podcasts, different types of fundraising. Uh, there, I saw event fundraising, I saw a crowd fundraising podcasts, and some other ones you may know, Julia Campbell, uh, We Are For Good, you might know Joan Gary, people like that, but working in there at number 10. Is your is your favorite, your favorite hebdominal podcast. With you since July of 2010, each and every week for pert near 15 years. Nonprofit radio. This is all because we have this outstanding associate producer. Kate, and that is Tony’s. Well, congratulations, pod father. I mean. The work, you can see it, all the hard work that goes into the show for 15 years. Oh, you deserve it. 15 years. 15 years. We’ve got boou but loads more time. Here’s the rest of Julia Campbell on social media. To validate what you’re explaining and sharing, LinkedIn for me has become my most popular platform. I’ve got the most connections there, right? That’s a vanity. I understand that, but I’ve also got most engagement on LinkedIn and other platforms where I’m less. Strategic and proactive. I’ve just, I’ve prioritized LinkedIn, so I picked one as a priority, and I would say my next is probably blue sky where I need to be more, more proactive, but that it’s newer, but I need to spend more time there. But you know, like, yeah, no, it’s true. I mean, you know, the things we measure are the things that get changed, right? So I’ve, my social manager and I put emphasis on LinkedIn. And it has made a difference over, over more than a year. I’ve just seen a steady, steady trend in the right direction in terms of engagement. And I I do recommend for the nonprofits listening, really look at your website and see where the traffic is being driven. If, if you, building up your website and a specific, specific pages of your website or specific resources on your website is a goal. For you, you might be surprised that LinkedIn is actually driving a lot of traffic or Pinterest, or another platform that you might not have thought of. We are so conditioned to just think Facebook is the king of social media, when actually the engagement and the reach on Facebook are the lowest. It’s the lowest of all of my channels that I’m on. And it’s the lowest of all of my clients’ channels. It’s not growing. It’s growing internationally, it’s not growing in America anymore. And it’s, I find that it’s just becoming incredibly stagnant over over on Facebook. It’s actually becoming very toxic from what I’ve been seeing. But I, we just are so conditioned to think, oh, that was the very first place we joined. We got a Facebook page. We’ve had it for 25 years now. And so, What are we going, you know, what we’re not, we have blinders on almost, I think, around that. And there’s so many other exciting platforms coming up and so many cool things going on. And LinkedIn also, I will say, is really doubling down on resources for nonprofits. If you go to LinkedIn for nonprofits, they have newsletters, they have a creator studio. They do a lot with Giving Tuesday. They just, I think they’re really trying to establish themselves in the third sector, um, and I think they’re doing a great job. So definitely something to think about if you’re getting kind of sick of the lack of engagement on Facebook. That’s good advice. Take a look at. Uh, you know, all your advice earlier still applies. You know, if you’ve got a good community and it’s active there, then naturally stay, but if not, if you’re seeing the declining engagement that so many of us have seen, my, my practice included, um, you know, either leave or DM or just deemphasize, deemphasize, you know, instead of, instead of a post a day, maybe it’s one a week, maintain a presence, but. You know, if it’s not, if it’s not paying off for you, then don’t spend your time on it. Just like, just like any program that you’re doing, you know, you evaluate your programs, right? Be like you’re saying, Julia, be strategic about thoughtful about your social strategies. Absolutely. And really looking at like YouTube, I’m so shocked about nonprofits, not posting video content on YouTube when it’s the #2 search engine owned by the #1 search engine. So if you have video content and all of us do, I would hope, repurposing it, putting it on YouTube where discoverability is key. It’s not your same donors that are following you, that are gonna follow you on YouTube. It’s brand new people that are hopefully going to discover you because they’re searching. They’re using YouTube as a search engine, people use Instagram as a search engine, TikTok. I think of younger people, especially like my daughter who’s 15, she would never Google something. She would look it up on TikTok. You know, she just wouldn’t, it’s like that’s where that’s her search engine. So that’s, we need to be thinking of these tools, not in terms of like broadcasting our message to our followers, but building new followers and being discovered and hopefully reaching brand new people. So your 15 year old daughter wouldn’t wouldn’t go to YouTube to search for something. She might go to YouTube, YouTube, but probably TikTok or Insta TikTok. Uh, uh, we’re gonna take a little digression, uh, around your background. You used to have, uh, I remember you had Ruth Bader Ginsburg up for a long time. Oh yeah, I have a Ruth Bader Ginsburg, um, but yeah, I changed it. I always have the nasty woman. Well, you’ve got my painted um right after Trump got elected in 2016. That’s been up for years and you’ve got a book with a biceps. Yeah, you’ve got a framed framed framed piece that says well behaved women don’t make history. Wonder Woman and then the one the etching behind me is my mom. Threw that, um, and you can’t see it. It’s so detailed. I know it’s like a good place for it because you can’t pencil? Yes, it’s an etching. So yeah, it’s really beautiful and I was, I actually put it there so it wouldn’t get broken. I need to put it in. I need to hang it up. And on the on the end, is that Wonder Woman’s Wonder Woman. Yes. So what is it about who do you consider strong women? Who do you clearly you you have a You you have an affinity for strong women. Uh, who do you think of? Oh wow. Well, do you know who my favorite right now is um Elona Mar. She’s the rugby player and she was on Dancing with the Stars and she’s 6 ft tall. She’s a Award winning, um, she’s just an incredible athlete, but she’s also just her social media is absolutely incredible about, she’s a different body type, you know, she’s got really broad shoulders. A lot of people think she’s a trans man, you know, write horrible comments on all of her stuff. Um, but she’s just such a light and so inspiring to women and to young girls who, you know, and I’m 6 ft tall, so I love, I love seeing not like little petite girly girls, you know, in my feet all the time. So, yeah, she’s someone I really love. And of course, I am still a huge fan of Hillary Clinton, still forever. I do you know that I went as Hillary Clinton for Halloween in 1992? I have loved her forever. So, I still follow her. I love her pithy comments on what’s going on um on Instagram. But, you know, I just am seeing so many. I mean, I watched all of the SNL 50. Uh, all of that coverage, so like Tina Fey, Amy Poehler are obviously amazing. I watched all of the Grammys, so like Dochi and just all of these incredible female performers. Chapel Rone is amazing. Lady Gaga, obviously. Just it’s the, you know, I think it’s the year of the woman. I’ve been seeing just everything I’ve been seeing in pop culture, um, a lot of women coming up into politics, getting really interested in politics now. Um, hopefully a lot more women will be leading nonprofits. I know that. I don’t know the percentage, but it’s incredibly small, especially women of color leading nonprofits. So I’ve, I’ve been seeing some positive signs despite all of the noise that is trying to keep marginalized groups down. I’ve been just seeing a lot of positive signs of resistance. And I’m very excited for the Handmaid’s Tale to come back in April. About Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Yes, so I do like her. I, I follow her videos. She was one of the ones that first started using reels actually. No stories. So she was one of the very first politicians that was using stories. And do you remember she would do Instagram Live where she would just be cooking in her kitchen. I would watch those all the time. It was when she was very first coming onto the scene. She would just do these Instagram lives cooking ramen in her kitchen and like talking about politics of the day. And I thought that was before anyone was doing that. And I thought that was really cool and made her very accessible, and just really interesting. Um, so she’s totally social media savvy, but yeah, she’s a powerful force. And Ayanna Presley, um, senator from Massachusetts, um, she is, she’s one of my absolute favorites. I follow her on social. I love her. So how do all these women influence your own practice? Well, I think being authentic to who you are and shunning the non-believers, you know, Seth Godin always says, shun the non-believers, and not getting so hung up on the people that don’t like you. And now, I am a Canarian. I was, I’m July 9, so I have the strong predilection to have people like me, and I’m a people pleaser. I’m also the oldest daughter. So I have all of these personality traits where I want people to like me. But then when I see what these other women are doing, and they’re standing up and they’re talking and they’re saying their truth, like Ayanna Presley actually has alopecia, and she shaved her head and she’s bald and beautiful and famously just, I mean, she’s stunning, but she’s bald and she just talks about it, and she shares her truth and helps other people. And that’s what I, you know, that’s, that just really inspires me. So, putting your personality into your work, I think is part of the reason why I have been so successful, um, but certainly, of course, not everyone agrees with me or likes me. I’ve gotten some nasty email responses, I’m sure you have too. From time to time, or like a nasty direct message about something. But to me, if people are not responding, it means they’re not paying attention. So, I try to remind myself to be provocative, to be authentic, to be myself, and never, never back down from things that I stand for. So that’s that’s really how they inspire me. Thanks for sharing all that. Sure. What else would you like to talk about? Well, it’s important. I, I like to, you know, too. And I know it’s memorable like I said, I know. I change it up once in a while, but These, the, the things behind me, they really ground me and just really helped me remember who I am and what I stand for, and also the fact that if you’re on a Zoom call with me and you don’t like my background, we’re probably not going to be able to work together, so. All right. What else would you like to talk about? We still have time. Well, you’re gonna go to NTC, right? I’m not able to go this year. OK, yes, I am going. Oh, it’s not. It’s not far from you as well. It’s not. It’s not far. I could probably stop by. I didn’t have any, I didn’t apply to speak, um, but I know you always do a great. Showcase in the exhibit hall, they’re actually it’s it’s nonprofit will be there. I’ll capture 15 or 20s. Yeah, yeah, make sure you let me know if you drop in for a day or something. I know I’m thinking of AFP Icon, which is in Seattle. I don’t know why I thought the nonprofit technology conference was in Seattle, but no, because it’s usually out there, right? Because that’s where they’re. Yeah. OK. Any other conferences you’re excited about this year? Um, yeah, I know, me too. I mean. Yeah, I, I, AFP I, yeah, I applied a bunch of years, you know, I have my theory about why I was never selected, so I don’t, I don’t go to AFP, even though it’s I know it’s huge, but they don’t, you know, being strategic. Yeah, I’ve heard that from a few people that I’m always shocked because like you, they’re really thought leaders in the field and I just don’t, I don’t understand how they pick, but. I, yeah, I’ve been on the NTC committee that’s chosen. Chosen proposals. I did that for a few years, but um, yeah, I don’t know. Icon is is such a. Such a hard nut to crack. You know what I’ve, I think it really does, it parallels what you’re saying about the social networks, and I’ve, I’ve embraced this in my own practice too. Um, I, I, I go where I’m wanted. And, and if, you know, if you’ve turned me down a couple of times. You don’t want me. That’s OK. I’m gonna focus on this is parallel to what you’re saying about the network. I’m gonna focus where people embrace me. They see the value and 10 and their nonprofit technology conference. They routinely welcome me on the what used to be the exhibit floor, like I said, now this year they’re calling it the hub. They routinely, you know, we work out a deal. I amplify their speakers with over 13,000 listens because nobody’s. You know, nobody’s getting 13,000 people coming to their 90 minute session. So I amplify their speakers and they, and they cut me a break and, and I’m, I’m, I’m wanted and, and I feel loved there. So, so routinely year after year I go back to the NTC wherever last year it was in Portland. It’s probably about as far as it could be from me in North Carolina, but I still was happy to go. It was a pleasure to go this year happens to be a little closer. I can drive from North Carolina to Baltimore, but it doesn’t matter. I’ll go year after year. Same thing with clients, same thing with the social networks. Like go where, go where folks embrace you and wanna work with you. That is, I love that. That’s perfect. I completely agree. Um, people always ask me, there’s several conferences, you know, like a nonprofit storytelling conference, but I’ve just never been asked to speak. I’ve never been accepted to speak, and that, and I am fine with it, and it’s just like you said, I don’t lose sleep over places that don’t want me, you know, I focus on where where people want me. It’s almost like really unsubscribes to my email list or people unfollowing me on social media. If I It’s just a, it’s just a signal that’s like, I’m not for you right now, or there’s something going on, or my message is not connecting with you, and that’s completely OK. And I think we do need to get More comfortable in our own skin. We also need a little thicker skin, but we need to say, this is what I stand for, this is who I am, this is my message, and that’s how you’re going to attract the right people to your cause. That’s how you’re going to attract people that want to participate, that want to become part of the movement, rather than we we just focus on numbers and not real quality of connection, a lot of the time. But I completely agree with that. I would only want to be somewhere that would really want me. Let me interject something you said earlier, quality over quantity, right? Real engagement on a couple of networks versus being in 12 different networks and nothing is you’re not gaining traction. No, I, I really do agree and just really, you know, understanding. That your audience wants to hear from you. I think that nonprofits tend to think they are bothering their audience. They don’t send, they send a quarterly email, you know, like 4 emails a year to your donors? No, that’s insane, cause what if they delete one and they don’t hear from you for half a year. So, we always think we’re inundating our donors, our message is boring, or we’re annoying people, but the reality is that, you know, your cause matters and what the work that you do matters, and people want to know about it, especially if they’re giving you money. If they’re not giving you money, they want to hear about it if they’re on your email list, but if they are giving you money, they want to hear what’s going on and they want to hear from you. So we have this imposter syndrome. That is very hard for a lot of people to shake. And I would just encourage any nonprofits listening, you know, communicate more and communicate more authentically, and communicate more strongly than you might be comfortable with. You know, I’ve I’ve received, I’m thinking about Everything going on in the news, like you, you don’t have to, you shouldn’t say something maybe specifically about Trump. I’m not saying you have to do that, but to not comment on the federal funding freeze if it’s affecting your organization, I want to know that as a donor. I wanna know, oh, like, did the USAID shut down? How did that affect Amnesty International, or how did that affect these international organizations? I really want to understand that more. But having, you know, just being so afraid to talk about anything going on in the headlines, that’s not serving your donors. It’s not serving your community and it’s not serving your mission. I have a client that does international relief work and I’m sorry. I said that right to their donors, including their planned donors, and the messages of support that they’re getting back, they’re heartening and heartbreaking at the same time. I mean, you, you, you hear the people’s frustration. And some of them respond with gifts with increased gifts, including, you know, these are folks who have already included the, the, the organization in their long term plan in their will or something else, and now they’re making a cash gift. Uh, I saw one, you know, um, I wanna do an uh a qualified charitable distribution which is an, an IRA transfer for folks who are 70.5 and over, but it’s, it’s immediate cash. It’s not at the person’s death. It, it comes. Immediately now and there and there are others, you know, so yeah, to your point, people do want to hear. They, they love your work, your, your messages are not junk mail and spam to them, and in a lot of cases they will, they will respond even though in with, with gifts, even though you’re not asking for gifts. You’re just informing, but they love your work that much. They hate to see. It hurts them to see that your work is, is, is being impinged on, impinged on, that’s putting it mildly. Your work is being devastated, you know, in, in other parts of the world. They don’t like to see that. And I saw, I saw a great Instagram post, uh, rescue.org. They did a whole series about how to talk to your friends and family about the importance of humanitarian aid. So it was a series of. where they addressed some of the miss and misconceptions. So an example would be, you know, if your dad says to you, well, all foreign aid is just a waste, or, you know, just um, corruption. How do you address that? Or if it says, well, why don’t we just focus on America? How do you address that? So, it was really interesting because I shared it and my stories, I took um photos of it, because it was so helpful. Because obviously people that follow Rescue.org care about humanitarian aid. Um, and so it was a helpful way for us to say, OK, here, we don’t really know how to participate in this conversation. It’s so emotional, it’s so fraught, but here are some talking points that you can use. So that helps your community. It helps your mission, um, but it helps your community advocate for you. And I’ve been seeing a lot of that lately and I love that trend. Julie Campbell, what else do you want to talk about? We still got some time. What else? Um, how much time do we have? 10 minutes or so. Oh, I have a call at 3. Oh, you do. Oh, OK. All right, then let me ask you. I you and I chatted at the top of the hour. Oh, I know we took some time. Um, let me ask you then sky. What do you see? What’s your opinion? Blue sky right now, which I love. It tends to trend toward more social justice, social activism, and left leaning causes right now. Because people are leaving Twitter, but I see it growing and expanding. Content moderation and data privacy are big priorities for that company. I don’t see ads, I don’t see a lot of crap in my, you know, feed. Um, it’s very curated and it’s, uh, I think it’s a much more positive experience right now for me. So I really encourage you, you’re a nonprofit. I think at least to, um, At least to set up your account there. So, save your name, at least bookmark your name, and then, you know, and then like I’d say with everything else, spend time on the platform, see what other people are doing, follow other organizations that make sense, follow consultants you like and writers and influencers, creators that you like, and see what they’re posting. And I, I think it’s, it’s gonna actually grow. I mean, I’m hoping that, I’m hoping that it will grow. I just, it’s not like no other social platform out there in terms of management and what I’m seeing in the feed right now. It’s very like curated and I really like it. Julie Campbell, social media maven. Hey, thank you. My pleasure. You’ll find Julia on LinkedIn. You’ll find her practice at JCsocialmarketing.com. I hope I see you at NTC. Let me know if you’re there. OK, I will let you know. Thank you very much. Thanks for sharing, Julia, savvy advice. Thank you very, very much. Thanks, Tony. Thanks for everything that you do and everything you do for the sector. Thanks. Next week, nonprofit activism in our political environment. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by Donor Box. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor Box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. I love that alliteration. You didn’t think I was gonna do it this week, did you? Uh, I knew it. That’s why I did it. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for February 24, 2025: Prudence In Our Political Environment

Gene Takagi & Amy Sample Ward: Prudence In Our Political Environment

Following from our December episode, “Is It Paranoia Or Prudence?,” Gene Takagi and Amy Sample Ward return with updates from the grass roots on DEI, USAID and other spending freezes, major media capitulation, and information on a potential reincarnation of last year’s H.R. 9495 bill. Most importantly, they share advice and resources on how to cope—and keep your nonprofit in the safest posture. Gene is our legal contributor from NEO Law Group. Amy is our technology contributor and CEO of NTEN.

Gene Takagi

 

 

 

 

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer the embarrassment of metathiciaophobia if you changed your routine and missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer Kate with what’s on the menu. Hey, Tony. I hope our listeners are hungry for prudence in our political environment. Following from our December episode, is it paranoia or prudence? Gene Duagi and Amy Sample Ward return with updates from the grassroots on DEI, USAID, and other spending freezes, major media capitulation, and information on a potential reincarnation of last year’s HR 9495 bill. Most importantly, they share advice and resources on how to cope and keep your nonprofit in the safest posture. Gane is our legal contributor from NO Law Group. Amy is our technology contributor and CEO of N10. On Tony’s Take 2. The activist group I co-host. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor Box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. Here is prudence in our political environment. It’s always a genuine pleasure to welcome back Jean and Amy. Our esteemed contributors at nonprofit Radio, Gene Takagi, our legal contributor and principal of NEO, the nonprofit and exempt organizations law group in San Francisco, he edits that wildly popular nonprofit law blog.com and is a part-time lecturer at Columbia University. You’ll find the firm at Neo Law Group and Jean is at GTA GTAK. Amy Sample Ward, our technology contributor and CEO of N10, they were awarded a 2023 Bosch Foundation fellowship. Yeah, but what have you done lately? That was two years ago. And their most recent co-authored book is The Tech That Comes Next about equity and inclusiveness in technology development. They’re on Blue Sky as Amy Sample Ward. Gene and Amy, welcome back. I never don’t laugh when you say podfather. It puts me in such a good mood, you know, we’re about to talk about like so many sad trombones, but we started with Podfather, so at least I got a laugh while on mute. Thank you very much. I’m glad I’m glad you’ve heard it many times and it still makes you laugh. And can I answer your rhetorical question about As if I had not done anything, which I appreciate in like a there’s a very fatherly way of being like, what have you even done, um, but a plug that was not on our agenda to talk about today, so I’ll just say it and then we can move on with the agenda, yes, go ahead. Um, incredible N0 Community Committee gave feedback and Tristan and I, um, and FUA have refined all that feedback and then the newest version of the equity guide is about to be published, the equity guide for nonprofit technology. That’s Tristan Penn, and then like a whole, you know, a couple dozen community members who met previously and gave feedback about. You know, uh, none of the previous equity guide content is like gone, but I think as time continues to change, we always wanted it to be a living resource and and just this latest iteration. Adds a lot more layers about security, privacy, um, ownership, you know, thinking about. The extent that our decisions around technology kind of weave into so many other, either potential challenges we’re gonna face or or ways of how we’re gonna operate, you know. I admire that N10 is leaning into equity and not uh shrinking away from it, leaning in affirmatively with an update to your equity guide. All right. Well, because that’s part of it, we can certainly get into it, but as a word is it’s not tokenism. It is because we truly believe in equitable world is possible. If we didn’t, why are we here? Why are we doing this work if we don’t think. That beautiful world is possible, you know, and it wouldn’t be beautiful if it wasn’t for all of us. Right, and it’s trying to achieve, uh, something that we may never fully achieve, but the, the journey is Meritorious, valuable, important, worthy, all right. We’re gonna, we’re gonna get to, uh, I don’t know, I don’t, I don’t know if it’s a, I don’t know if it’s a prior restraint on speech, uh, uh, using with token words that you are not using as tokens. I understand that, but, uh, but we’re not, we’re not quite there. So I want to uh open with uh just continuing our conversation from December. We were together in December. We promised listeners we would come back together in February. Here we are. Most of our conversation in Feb in December was devoted to House Resolution HR 9495, which died in the 118th Congress. So now if it’s going to come back, uh, it would have to be uh reintroduced under a new title, but because 9495 died with the old Congress. But it’s certainly, that certainly could happen. Uh, Gene, you have some insights into what, uh, what we, what, what, what, and the, the potential for a reincarnation of the 9495 HR. Yeah, and, um, great to be here with both you and Amy. Uh, first of all, um, HR 9495 did die with the last Congress, but that’s because it passed so late in, in, in, in the congressional year. So, um, as we entered into the new Congress at the beginning of January, um, things have to be reintroduced under a different, uh, name and number. Burr and so we’ll, we’re likely to see this come back again because it passed the House, um, and it didn’t make it through the Senate, but it was not rejected by the Senate. They just didn’t have time to deal with it. The Senate was also uh had a majority of Democrats on uh uh in in their roster at that time, but with the change in Congress at the beginning of the year, now the Republicans control both the House and the Senate. And this vote on HR 9495 was, was very strongly on partisan lines. So if it got reintroduced, there’s a very possible chance um that it gets passed. So it’s something just to, to think about. Um, if that possibility still exists, and we can discuss pros, cons, and, and likelihood and all the rest, but I, I’ll let you tell us where to go, Tony. Well, let’s see, in terms of a new bill, let’s see what does develop. It feels likely to me that something will come. Uh, so when it does, I guess that’s pretty defeatist, but uh it’s what I believe. When it does come, you know, we’ll talk about the details of it because it could be changed from what it, what 94, 95 was, uh, there, there may be changes to it. Um, but also important for folks to know, Gene, that there are other methods through which The executive branch in particular can ah. Cause trouble for nonprofits uh based on uh the the funding activities whether you’re funding or even just talking about people who are perhaps under a terrorist supported organization or supported by a terrorist supported organization or once removed from these, there are some mechanisms that are already out there that exist right today. They don’t need to be passed anew. Yeah, so HR 9495 or whatever its progeny should should be if it’s similar, um, is not the most draconian of of laws, even though it created sort of panic within the sector. Um, there are existing laws on the book that give the executive branch a lot of discretion, uh, to really, um, either revoke 501c3 status from organizations that are. Deemed to support terrorist organizations um or even uh act uh against fundamental established public policy whatever that may be and with our executive branch well you know we we talk about kind of all of the things that are harming the nonprofit sector and all the communities that the nonprofit sector benefits, which is everyone, um. Uh, yes, the executive branch has a whole lot of power to do a lot worse even so this deluge of executive orders and memos and the like, you know, we, we, we’ll get into, but there are other laws out there that can even be exercised that are more tough. The danger with 94, 95 or whatever might come out of it is that it looks. Like it’s a little bit kinder with a little bit more due process than some of the really harsh laws. Now I’m free, I’m afraid that that could be a tool of use to, to be able to justify it and scare the sector by targeting a few organizations and then saying, hey, we’re going to do this to anybody that goes against us. Um, and that’s my general fear. And perhaps making it more palatable because it, it did include due process that uh that other existing regulations don’t include. So could you say though, as you were talking about, you know, I’m just, um, pretending that I’m a listener and not having access to the mic right now while you’re talking and You know, the way you were describing the laws that already exist, access to power that is already available, um, to the executive branch, you use the term terrorist organization. Can you, you know, I think a lot of nonprofits would be like, that’s not us, like we’re safe here, but can you talk a little bit about how that definition is, or how that term is defined and and used or misused? So there are probably dozens of laws that define terrorist organizations in different contexts. This is outside of the tax code, right? So this is. No one’s putting on their 990. Yes, I’m a terrorist. Um, but the fear, I think, and, and why 9495. arose in the legislature is, is, I think, because, not because they wanted another tool to stop terrorism or the support of terrorism. I, I think it arose because, um, there are members of Congress that really did not like that some people were supporting Palestinians in in Gaza and Um, the Palestinians were ruled by Hamas, which was designated a terrorist organization. So Hamas is a terrorist organization in, in our books and just a lot of things. Amy, just to your, your whimsical point, you, you, you could have a 990 that mentions support for Palestinians, right? Yeah, and so what is the algorithm that they’re going to use to say, hey, let’s take a closer look at this organization, throw a wrench in their operations, maybe have the right to take away their 501c3 status? What 9495 doesn’t do, which we mentioned in the last show, but I, I think it’s worth reiterating, is it does not stop you from operating. It just takes away your 501c3 status. So again, A less harsh tool than they already have in the books, um, but one that might be used because it looks better. And when we talked about due process, Tony, let’s put that in quotation marks because there are some outs from some of those due process protections as well, so. Save it for another show because again it could get redefined in the new bill. All right, all right, cool. Um, Amy, let’s go off with the guide. Uh, we’ve got, uh, we’ve got a chilling around a chilling hostility toward diversity, equity, inclusion, belonging. Uh, uh, all as, you know, illegal discrimination. I mean, if you get into the, if you get into the text of the, the one order anyway, the one executive order, uh, 14173 talks about ending illegal. Diversity, equity, inclusion, discrimination, uh, but, but that it’s not currently illegal, but I’m not sure that qualification really matters. It’s, it’s, it’s having a chilling effect on Websites, um, I don’t know if it’s going as deep as mission statements. Maybe it is, Amy, maybe you’re hearing some of that, uh, but I mean, I’m reading about websites being prophylactically scrubbed of language that the administration deems, uh, inappropriate and is hostile to. Uh, Amy, why don’t you share what you’re what you’re hearing from folks? Yeah, I think there is. Um, you know, if, if anyone ever watched, uh, Thomas the Tank Engine or read Thomas the Tank Engine, they say all the time, confusion and delay, that is what is happening. So much confusion and delay, right? It’s Ringo Starr, right? Ringo Starr the station manager, it’s it’s Ringo Starr saying that, isn’t it? Yeah. Um. That’s like the nice way to put it, of course, right? Like there’s already. Countless documented actual harms, deaths, delayed or stopped medical interventions. Like all of these things have come. I’m not trying to downplay it with Thomas the Tank Engine, but maybe make it light enough that we can keep having a conversation, um, because otherwise, like, the reality is super, super hard, and I don’t want to deny that. Um, I think we’re hearing from a lot of organizations who And N10 has had this conversation too, of how do we navigate. Keeping our staff and our either service recipients or program participants or, you know, beneficiaries of our mission, what whatever it is safe so that we can continue to do this work. Like we don’t want to stop the work that we do, but, but how do we stay safe enough that we’re employed to do it or that, you know, we are able to offer these programs and. Um, I welcome Jean’s insights, but I think that question is kind of a recurring theme with maybe answers that are different every day for organizations, right? Like they’re coming up with, OK, today, like things are a little different, this is what that’s gonna look like. We’re hearing from, you know, I think a lot of the websites or service providers that I’ve at least seen, not that I have a chronicle of the entire internet, um, despite what you may think, but the folks I’ve seen doing the most proactive scrubbing are folks. Either completely reliant or predominantly funded by the government. And so that is less about the language of of executive orders and much more about the actual felt pause or discontinuation of funding, you know, and, and wanting that piece to not be the barrier. And I think there’s a lot of arguments. That are super valid about not scrubbing that, you know, if you invisibilize community members, you are not serving them in those services, cause they don’t know that it’s safe to still get services from you, and maybe it isn’t safe to still get services from you. And because we are in a world, and we are complex humans, multiple things can be true at the same time. That is true and I want to create space to say that that is also a potential mechanism for keeping staff and patients safe so that they can continue to operate, right? So it’s both troubling and not helpful to invisibilize communities by erasing that language from your website, and also if that allows you to get funding so long as you’re still serving them, and they are safe and protected. You know, it, it is complex, um, but I think that’s the kind of scenario we’re hearing from organizations that they’re trying to balance. Where there isn’t a right answer, and, and also none of the answers maybe feel good, but they’re trying to, you know, what can you do on your website versus what could you do in your services, um. I think another place of real worry, and this goes back to conversations, um, Jean and I have had with you, Tony, about 94, 95, and, and other, uh, powers that many administrations have used to come for organizations, and that is the incredible data that we have been entrusted with as nonprofits, and that that Less of our mission or our services, or even honestly our staff, but just the database we have that says these are all the people who needed X, Y, and Z service, that’s, that’s the thing, um, that’s gonna have even more targeting, and so we’re also hearing from a lot of folks who Well, this is not a new practice for the federal government to come for your list and really want to know who’s accessing certain services or benefiting from certain missions. Because of the level of rhetoric around the White House right now, I think folks who have had the privilege to not be threatened by that in the past are now thinking about it, really, for the first time, right? And thinking, OK, what does it look like to Create our database where all of the demographic information for, say, participants in our programs is animized, and we are just never connecting that to individual records. What does it look like to, you know, what, what can we do? It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s Donor Box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you, a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges. Helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs. Helping you, help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now back to Prudence in our political environment. Gene, you’re getting a lot of calls I know as well, folks just with generalized concerns or maybe more specific based on their work, but what, uh, what are you able to tell folks? How, how are you reassuring or, or maybe it’s not reassuring, but what are you sharing with folks? Yeah, I mean what Amy talked about in terms of the complexity and. Um, basically one size doesn’t or one solution doesn’t fit everybody’s, um, sort of needs. Um, I, I think one of the first things I talk about is if you’re going to make decisions on what you’re going to do, whether it be scrub your website or change your programs or change your mission or or whatever, or advocate and fight against, you know, uh, uh, what the government is doing. You wanna do that on an informed basis, so you wanna make sure that you are talking with your communities, your stakeholders, um, your board should definitely be involved um and assessing kind of the risks and the risk tolerances you might have, what you’re threatened with, um, uh, if things go bad, talking about sort of contingency planning. Uh, of, of, or scenario planning about what might happen if you were to go on this course and sort of mapping it all out and saying, OK, what is the best direction for our organization. So I think. Um, from a governance role, from the board role, that would sort of be my first step is get your board involved and make sure you’re hearing from them some pieces of information that you might not have and, and, and vice versa as well. Talk to your employees, talk to your beneficiaries, and we talked about, um, having, uh, uh, town town hall type meetings, um, you know, uh, that may be a good thing to start out with. In terms of being informed, there’s so much misinformation out there and and part of it is intentional coming from the government, right? Again, they want to scare the sector as a whole or the sector writ large into compliance with what their policy aims are, um, and this is extreme now but it it is kind of that’s how governments tend to operate, you know, generally speaking, and now we’re just at a very extreme level of how far they want to get into it. Um, so it is assessing now, um, you know, those executive orders definitely if you’re receiving federal funding that’s discretionary, right? They can fund who they want and so if they put parameters around that about if you say you have a DEI policy we’re not gonna fund you, that places an entirely different risk tolerance on organizations that rely on federal funding. Now for the organization that doesn’t get any federal funding. To to sort of follow what the organizations that get federal funding and scrub all the DEI off their website if DEI is a core value and part of their mission. That may not be the right thing to do there for all the reasons Amy said because you’re trying to fight for your community, including your, you know, your beneficiaries in the future and if you give up on all of this and if everybody gave up on all of this, um, your organization and its mission are gonna really suffer and your beneficiaries are gonna suffer and the ecosystem that you’re in your environments are gonna suffer and communities are gonna suffer so it really is just something to think about and so for those. Looking at the executive orders closely, you’ve said the term properly, Tony, the executive orders are going after illegal DEI and DEI isn’t. A a real thing that you can grab a hold of, right? It’s diversity, equity and inclusion. Well, the words aren’t illegal, so what would be illegal? Something illegal would be saying like we are only going to hire a BOC individual to be our executive director. We won’t look at anybody else. That is illegal. So if you use race to base a decision on employment, that is illegal, um. The the fearless fund issue that I think we have also talked about yeah that has to do with making and enforcing contracts based on race. So that would say be like I will only enter into a contract if you are white or if you are black or if you are an indigenous or Native American person. You can’t do that either, right? So you can’t make or enforce a contract based on race. Where this gets dicey now is if you say we wanna run a program to, you know, address uh historical and systemic discrimination against a particular race or or races. If you structure that as a contract, like if you say you can participate in our program, but in return you must do this. Hm. If you make it as a contract which would fearless fund had too much contractual language in there, which is why they settled, it would have been bad precedent for the sector. Now there are other arguments for why that law shouldn’t be applied in this way when it was originally created in the 1860s, by the way, it was to protect black people who were formerly enslaved, um, from being. You know, taken away from, from, uh, the right to enforce contracts because you weren’t white. Um, that is, you know, it’s even mentioned in the statute, and now it’s being flipped in the, you know, reverse discrimination. But Jean, the other side of that, that I wanted to bring up, I’m glad you brought up Fearless Fun. That was, that was one side. And the other side is, was it last week? Time is an accordion. I don’t, I don’t know, uh, when this happened. But I think it was last week I saw the Missouri AG. With the suit against Starbucks, saying that the the Starbucks workforce, which is probably like a million employees worldwide, but probably just looking at the US is majority. Not men and majority, not white. And so that means it’s like it’s a proof of illegal DEI hiring or something. But as soon as I said that, my first thought, and Jean, tell tell me if I should stand down on my anxiety spirals of everything, um. But my first thought was, OK, well, like, let’s take a quick gander at the nonprofit sectors, demographics. Guess what are also majority, not men, major, you know, like, of course, because they’re is it that’s just the, oh my God, OK, yeah, because diversity is a value and because we’re, we’re basing our decisions that I’m gonna say like 98.5% of them on, on. Uh, the content of your character and your credentials, whether formal or informal for the job and not and not the color of your skin and your race. All right, so let’s, but yeah, Gene, Amy’s Amy’s pleading. Yeah, so the way it read in the media, at least the media I read, it’s a ridiculous lawsuit in Missouri. Um, I don’t know if there’s something deeper into that, that the news media didn’t pick up, but, um, and, and you can see I’m, I’m CYA because I’m a lawyer, um. Uh, but yeah, that seems ridiculous, but it does raise actually a great point of state laws can even be worse than federal laws, um, so, uh, you know, um, depending upon what state you’re in, I’m in California, so our, our laws are pretty. You know, OK, relative to the federal laws in terms of how hostile or friendly they are to nonprofits, but there are other states where that may not be true and Miss Missouri might be an example of where there are, you know, state laws that can be used as a basis for attacking a nonprofit, but this is to say that if I were to go into any nonprofit organization and you left me with a few hours to look at their books, I could probably find some sort of violation there. Um, cleaning up compliance on general things like making sure you’re registered with the state, um, and if you’re in multiple states, like figuring out which ones you need to register in, because that is a really easy way to close you down without there being any fuss. You just didn’t meet the requirements and boom. You have a whole, you have an article on this. We’re gonna let’s let’s talk about it in nonprofit quarterly. Uh, yeah, it’s so it’s right, if they want to, if they want to find something. You’re right, Gene, probably 2 hours, 2 hours with any person’s, uh, tax, tax history would probably incriminate them and, and subject them to, to sanction for, for no for noncompliance. So, I, uh, I wanna preface just with your so folks can find the article, it’s in nonprofit Quarterly. Gene wrote it, so you’re looking for the byline by Gene Takagi, it was January 20th, 2025. Nonprofit legal compliance in an unfriendly political environment you find that in nonprofit quarterly. Gene, let’s tick off some of the things that could easily, uh, be much more, well, I don’t know, much more troublesome, could easily be troublesome irrespective of what your mission is, what your website says, what values you hold deeply, just, uh, fundamental compliance things that And housekeeping that may not have been paid as much attention to as they should be, and now they ought to be. Yeah, so you know some of the fundamental things are just making sure you’re qualified to do business in a particular state. So if you’re incorporated in New York, that doesn’t give you the right to operate in Texas or in California, right? So a lot of people talk about registration, which is sort of in your sort of corner of the world too, Tony, make sure your solicitations are registered in all the states where you’re soliciting. But qualification to do business is not specific to charities. It’s to for-profits, it’s to nonprofits who aren’t charities, um, and it’s a different filing. You have to do both. Like, so if you have boots on the ground or you have programs in another state, um. As long as for lawyers out there you meet minimum contacts, uh, requirements and you have to be qualified to do business there and that may be a filing with the Secretary of State or someone other than the charities regulator. So the charities regulation stuff is above and beyond that you could get shut down for either missing either filing so. To to be aware of that now if it’s not your state of incorporation um they can only shut you down in your activities in that particular state, but as Amy knows with our technology now how do you do that? Like if you have members and donors and. In some state, how do you shut off one and not the other and now when we use charitable fundraising platforms like PayPal and stuff, they say, hey, if you are noncompliant in any state, we’re shutting you all down because we don’t want to get in trouble either. So now that wipes off all of your online fundraising through that platform, um, which can really harm organizations. So that is a big one, so qualifications as well as registrations. Gene, let’s talk about, uh, even more fundamental, uh, adhering to your mission, adhering to your, uh, your originating documents, your articles of incorporation, your bylaws, are you running the organization the way your bylaws say? Uh, all right, so I ticked off a couple, you’re bored. The duties of care and loyalty or as your, so I’m, I’m glossing over because I’m not the practicing attorney that Gene is, so, but. Uh, I’m not qualified to go any deeper. I’m a good, you know, like I’m a good surface scratcher. That, that’s just no, uh, in, in a lot of things that’s true, but, uh, Gene, please help me, get me out of this morass that I just, uh, got myself into. Uh, some of the, the more basic things about your, your work and your originating documents that you need to be adhering to. Yeah, so articles and bylaws really important because a lot of organizations have really old articles and bylaws that they haven’t been looking at. Their mission statements or their practices may have now changed from what the bylaws or the articles originally contemplated. That could be a reason for shutting you down or for removing your board members and having it replaced maybe by a receiver um who sides with whatever the state priorities are so you could find your organization and it’s control who controls that organization changed because you’re not compliant. So again, an easy way to say. We’re gonna shut you down not because of your policies. We don’t have to go there. We’re gonna shut you down for you didn’t follow your articles and bylaws. Your articles say you only operate in, you know, ABC County, but now you’re in EFG County as well, like you’re, you’re operating. Against the law, we’re shutting you down. Um, so be very, very careful. I know, again, some states would not even think of that, like would not think to do that. But other states may not. Well, Jean, I’ve been on boards of other organizations where, because those are quite important documents, there’s this preciousness to the bylaws that they can’t be touched. And You know, the response I got when I said, well, we can just take a vote and change our bylaws was like blasphemy, right? You can amend your you can amend your bylaws, just follow the bylaws in the bylaws, right? Is that right? Right. But I mean, you know, as a nonprofit, for example, Every 2 years, we are making sure, is this document reflective of how we want to be operating, right? And, and really looking through it. So I don’t know, Gene, if you wanna say something that like to Tony’s point comes from you and not from me, uh, but yes, like, go change your bylaws. Don’t just hear the feedback of like, make sure you’re in compliance, but also update them, make them something you want to be in compliance with. I love that Amy um and the regular, you know, schedule that that antenna is looking at. I do, I, I, I am concerned with a lot of nonprofits can’t really afford a lot of legal help, a lot of pro bono help doesn’t understand this area very well. The bylaws can seem a little overwhelming to boards who don’t understand all that legalese in there. Right. Um, so I’m, am a little cognizant of that. There are certain areas though where you should just look and you can tell, are we in compliance or not? How often are we meeting? How many board members do we have? Are we really having elections as they are supposed to happen and not just letting board members stay on because we like them, um, and you don’t need a lawyer if I mean you could. I would advocate that you still have a lawyer look at it, but if the only thing in your bylaws you were changing was our board is Whatever, 7 to 12 members, and now you realize you really want more board members and you’re changing it from 12 to 20. You’re not changing the terms, you’re not changing anything else. Just change those two numbers. Take a vote formally at your next board meeting and like, great, now you have updated. You know, I don’t want folks to feel like You’re not smart enough or you’re not qualified to review those and and want to make changes. Yeah, I hate to be sort of the proponent of something I heard Elon Musk who, who has all of your individual tax records as I was thinking when you mentioned that, Tony. Um, but, um, you don’t want perfect to be sort of the, the enemy of good here. Yeah, so you just have to be very, very careful of that. And, and as a side note, Elon said that about saying we’re spending $50 million of USAID money on condoms for Hamas, um, so. And then he said that quote is not generally attributed to him, like certainly been around, yeah, just like all right let me get out of the morass that the rabbit hole you just entered. um, all right, so now, Amy, you do make a very good point. The, the, the, the point that we’re all making is just be consistent. Your, your documents and your true operations need to be the same. So if the bylaws are out of date, work on amending. You don’t have to change the way you’re operating, just get the bylaws up to date with, you know, now you’re meeting 4 times a year instead of the 3 times a year that your bylaws say. All right. Well, and just can I make a technology point about that consistency too, um, this came up last week when I was presenting at the Alabama State Association um um state nonprofit association summit and talking about data and policies in a place where there’s not that consistency between maybe privacy policy you have and how staff manage the database or, or, you know, data from programs um place whatever the scenario is, and really Uh, inviting listeners to put on the calendar a good hour in tomorrow or in an upcoming day, to look at all the data that you’re collecting and say, do we need to collect all of this? It’s a lot of work to protect your data, and it is less work if you have less data, right? And so, if you’re never, if you’re never gonna Need uh one of those fields, or you know that you’re really only looking at, say, for our conversation here, demographic data. For the whole year, once a year, you can either stop collecting things or collect it differently or store it differently, that already sets you up to make it safer and and more protected. And so thinking about not just do we have a privacy policy, do we have a data retention policy? Like, please make sure you have those types of things and and that you’re practicing them, but also looking at those, just like you. Bylaws and saying, gosh, this privacy policy was written when we were formed in 2005, and like, is irrelevant to us now. We need to update these policies. And with that, we need to update our, our practices, um, and how we actually operate, um, because there is a lot that would be. At stake, um, if, if your data was compromised or subpoenaed or whatever, and so even these kind of practical pieces help that. I, I, I agree 100%. And just as an example, like if you, the lawyer signs off on what I said, I feel like I did it right, you know. Uh, if ICE, you know, comes and visits your nonprofit organization and demands sort of records of individuals who benefited from your organization’s services and you know, you have data going back years that you have no need to keep, and all of a sudden you’re turning all of that over. Um, think what harm that could be doing to your communities. It doesn’t matter whether they actually end up, you know, having anybody that’s relevant to ICE, but they could just terrorize the people that you’re trying to serve. And I think, you know, a common, when I’ve brought up an example like that, or, you know, Maybe you do pro bono legal clinics and you have this whole many years record of who’s come to those clinics. You probably don’t need that, but I, I hear the. The pushback or the question from a lot of different nonprofit staff saying, yeah, but like, how, we don’t want to delete that. We wanna know, OK, in 2010 we had 100 people, but then by 2014, we were serving 500 people. Great. You don’t need to know that it was Jean Takagi at this address in California that was one of those 100. You just need to know that there were 100, right? Or maybe you want to know that. It was client A who lived in California versus client B who lived in Colorado. Great. But, but again, you, you don’t need all of that data probably. And the more that you can get rid of, or not even collect in the first place, helps in the situation Gene’s talking about when someone comes in and says, hand it over, what are you really having to hand over then, you know, OK, well, here’s a list of counties, Godspeed to you, you know. It’s time for Tony’s take 2. Thank you, Kate. I co-host a. Nonprofit activist group. We are the nascent nonprofit activist group. We met once in December, we met again in February. We’re gonna try to keep up a meeting a month. Um, there’s about 40 people or so who joined the meetings, about 65 on our email list. And we’re talking about the issues that Gene and Amy and I are talking about on today’s show. So if you’d like to be be more activist than than just listening and, and dealing with this on your own, uh, we’re, we’re supportive, you know, there’s a lot of cross talk, it’s not, it’s not all 11 directional talk. Uh, we are helping each other and we are gonna be, after these two meetings now, we’ve had sort of informational, we had a guest speaker who I’m probably gonna have on the show in the, in the next few weeks, um. And so if you would like to be part of our supportive activist group, it’s very easy. Just email me, Tony at Tony Martignetti.com. I, I need your, just, I need your name and email. And uh you can also use uh the contact page at Tony Martignetti.com. I’m co-hosting this group with Beth Kanter and Jay Frost. They have both been on the show multiple times. You may know them in their own work as well. So the three of us are co-hosting this the the nascent nonprofit activist group. Please join us if uh you think that uh we can help you and if you have something to contribute to the group. That is Tony’s take too. Kate, I don’t have much to add this time other than I think it’s really cool to see these um conversations popping up um with, you know, the new administration and All the change that’s going on and the uncertainty, um, I mean, even in classes, we’re actually sitting down, putting aside the curriculum for a second, but in our education course we’re having these conversations in class, trying not to keep it political, but I think having that conversation is so important. It is, it’s so supportive, so that you know, you know, in your class, you know that you’re not the only one having concerns. I mean, you’re in an education curriculum and the Department of Education is at risk. That, that, uh, that can be very troublesome. The Department of Education sets standards, spends billions of dollars on public education. Etc. So yes, just in terms of support, knowing you’re not the only one with concerns, and then also this activist group is, you know, we’re, we’re activists, so we’re not just gonna support each other as important as that work is, we’re gonna start taking some actions. I don’t know if it’s gonna be calls or letter writing or emails or what we’re gonna do. We don’t know yet, but. It’s, it’s important to not only support each other, but also take action. Well, we’ve got booku but loads more time. Here’s the rest of Prudence in our Political Environment with Gene Diagi and Amy Sample Ward. Let’s go a little more uh focused to our colleagues who do uh foreign aid, uh, foreign development, uh, international development work. Uh, affected by the USAID freeze, um, there’s also an OMB freeze. These are in different states of litigation. There are, there are orders issued by judges against these freezes, but the orders don’t seem to be. Uh, being followed by the administration, or we’re not sure. Gene, what, what are you hearing like specifically from the, the uh Community development, you know, foreign, foreign aid work. What was really harsh, right? And so I think I estimated, um, over 50,000 US jobs lost, uh, over 100,000 worldwide jobs lost because of, uh, of some of the, the freezes and cuts. Um, understandably, there, you know, existing contracts that nonprofits had agreed to in the past, um, for which they’ve delivered services and not gotten paid. Yet, um, but it’s through, through grant programs where the funding has stopped. So, um, you know, it’s really, really a harsh time now where organizations are laying off people, they’re cutting off programs, um, and they’re really scrambling to find out how are they going to keep, you know, advancing. Um, their, their mission where they are largely dependent upon federal funding and federal funding is is perhaps, uh, one of the largest sources of funds for the charitable sector, right? Um, it’s not foundation funding, it’s, it’s much, much larger than foundation funding, so it really is important to understand that philanthropy can do a little bit and they should probably do more, but they, they don’t have the capacity to fill the gap that the federal funding has, so, um. Uh, USAID, you know, especially. I think there’s just a lack of knowledge from people to understand well what USAID is. It’s not just giving money away to foreign countries. Um, there are like national interests, security interests, disease prevention, prevention of wars, there’s a lot that Um, reasons why USAID was formed and why we want to have good foreign relations and we, it’s not just, which I’ve heard a lot of folks feel like USAID is like a health, um it’s, you know, right. So yeah, that’s, I mean, that is sort of the, the big problem now and, and when you have somebody um who’s almost acting as an, as an executive in, in Elon Musk again, just to point him out again, announcing the intention to shut down USAID despite the court orders so. Um, you know, the apart from all of the, the funding cutbacks and, and the job losses, are they gonna really kill USAID? Are they gonna kill the Department of Education? like, are, what happens when we lose these things? How easy will they be to replace, um, and, um, what are we gonna do, um, without this? It’s, there’s gonna be a lot of suffering, so it’s organizations are gonna have to figure out, well, in this environment, what are we going to do. Mhm. You know there’s programs being cut. Uh, you know, people abroad sent home or, or there’s no funds to send them home. You know, we’ve, we’ve seen the stories. I think it’s, yeah, I was just gonna add to Jean’s point, um. And I don’t hear you saying this, you know, without any support, but I think As a nonprofit, you know, representative here, when I hear, OK, nonprofits are gonna have to like Try to figure out what do we do in this climate. It’s not a 1 to 1. Many organizations can’t just say we’re gonna fill this hole that that is presented by USAID being forced to, to stop, because we don’t have, to your earlier point, Jean. Contracts in place that say we then get to be the vaccine recipients, or we get to be the arbiters of grain. Like we those organizations don’t have in place the administrivia that allows us to then step in, which is really, just as we were saying that could be used against us as nonprofits if we don’t, you know, have our stuff in order. The the dismantling or even temporary pauses of components of our government is actually in the whole network of contracts and relationships, and, you know, collaborative agreements, and so, I think Nonprofits do, of course, have to think about what do we do now because of this, but we can’t. Maybe fool ourselves into thinking, oh yeah, we’ll just like step in and be them because we can’t replace all all of those agreements or contracts or or relationships. We’re actually thinking more about what do we do with the fallout because of this, and not how do we become the replacement of this, you know. Just to like maybe make it sound worse, I guess, is my point, but. Hey, when you mentioned grain too, um, Amy, I was thinking about the US farmers that are losing, um. I think 10s, maybe even hundreds of millions of dollars of of um purchases from the US government to feed other countries or to deliver that food out that will hurt our agricultural economy here as well. So, you know, even for the administration, um. You know, it’s supporters who, who were met many from rural areas and farming communities are, you know, getting screwed, maybe not directly but indirectly through these things as well. And, and there just has to be a bigger understanding, uh, which is a domino, right? That means more people in that community needing the support services that other nonprofits were already providing to folks, you know, um. And it’s in, I know it’s so different, but I do keep finding myself coming back to a lot of the hard feelings of 2020 when it’s like, Oh my gosh. Organizations across the sector were already operating at maximum, and like, you know, quote unquote, now more than ever, our missions are needed. And and here we are again at this place where, oh my gosh, it’s How, how do we serve more people? How do we can make sure we still have staff to do that because the need. Continues to have this exponential growth, um, feeling, if not actual, um, you know, number. There’s also a national security dimension to this, that, that we’ve, we’ve promised to deliver whatever type of aid, whether it’s, uh, I mentioned, you know, helping build your democracy in Romania, or whether it’s feeding in the African nations or healthcare, you know, we’ve made these commitments and now we’re just literally just walking away. We can no longer do what we were doing two weeks ago. So you’re on your own, uh, the US has screwed you. So there’s that, there’s just our perception in the world, how we’re perceived in the world, and Uh, who’s gonna fill that void? I think, I think some of our, uh, some of our deepest adversaries like China and, you know, China specifically, particularly because of their wealth and and reach, but there’s also a possibility of some terrorist organizations filling a gap on a, on a small, much smaller scale. Especially when you promised people who were helping you fight terrorism that you would allow them to bring themselves and their families into the country after they, they delivered that help and then now breaching that promise and saying no, you can’t come in here anymore. It’s heinous. It’s, it’s, it’s cruel. Yeah. Alright, we gotta take a, we gotta take a turn, uh, to media. Uh, Amy, you have some thoughts about, uh, you know, when I, when I suggested the topic of major media capitulation, even before the election, the Washington Post refusing to endorse any candidate, uh, the Los Angeles Times, same, USA Today, same. And then since the election, um, CNN settling a very questionable lawsuit for $10 billion. Uh, based on what, uh, what, what words, uh, George Stephanopoulos used, um, and it looking potentially like CBS may settle something also very, very questionable about the way they edited a teaser. Yeah, versus the fuller interview if you watch the show, I mean, you know, commercials are made to be short and and video is edited for commercial for short purposes and but the likelihood that CBS may settle that. Uh, so I, I hear, Major media are already part of the corporate industrial complex and so. Well, I would love for them to do better and be better. Am I surprised? No. What I feel is a really important Um, Happening that we should care about even more so than like those completely disappointing, but maybe anticipated, you know, choices, um. When other journalists have not stood with the AP and the AP has been blocked from briefings, that is the backbone of getting reliable direct information from our federal government out to people, right? Um. And all of that because the AP said the established name of this waterway. Yes, the Gulf of Gulf of America, so they were, they were banned from a White House event. This is why I believe what you’re getting to in the media, in the nonprofit community, we all have to support all of our sectors, all of our missions, all of our work, so that when it’s not a race, right? There’s not one. There’s not one trophy. So, if we do not stand together as nonprofits or as journalists, you know, we all will lose. It, I mean, I think Gan made this point earlier, right? Like nonprofits benefit everyone. Good journalism benefits everyone. We, we need. We need sunlight on that information, and we need it to be, this is directly what was said, right? Which is um what the AP is providing and is especially providing news, information, access to under-resourced communities where they do not have their own journalists, they do not have their own media bodies, and so they are just receiving literally that AP wire and reporting what’s happening. Um, and so if we let that crumble, again, just as, as other nonprofits, if we start saying, OK, well, I don’t know what a good. Example would be here, but like I know in a lot of especially smaller or distributed kind of rural communities, United Ways are often the organizations who are the only ones with the capacity to do kind of data aggregation on any regular schedule, right? and say this is the state of social services in our tri-county area for the, you know, and then so many nonprofits don’t have the capacity to do their own. Field research, and so they write grant applications using the United Way’s data. It’s, it’s very similar to in my mind, I think. And if we Don’t stay standing together, we all will lose. Um, and so I think it’s just really, um, a beacon to me right now of that, OK, well I don’t support that, that can, that is not. Giving me any good signs about the state of Journalism or or reporting and information uh in our system, as nonprofits, we cannot replicate that. If, if, if we are not gonna stay together, like all of the pieces, all of the components um can’t, can’t be successful, you know. We can also be sources of information, reliable data to the extent that we can, even if it’s within our own local community, at least we can, we, we can be reliable, we can footnote, we can provide information about it may and it may just be about our work, but we can be we can be reliable sources and, and of course there are some nonprofit, uh, journalism outlets, but you know, that’s a very small percentage of the. 1.5 million or 1 to 1.8 million depending whether you count foundations or not, nonprofits in the US. So, But each of us can be scrupulous about our own, our own data reporting. Mhm. Yeah, I think it’s so important now as well because we don’t all just collect news from our major, major media sources, right? Um, a lot of us relied on Twitter before, for example, um, a lot of us relied on just television shows, um, like the Daily, um, so it’s, it’s about understanding how things that we thought. We’re gonna be more transparent and put more sun like like Twitter led to the Arab Spring or helped, you know, facilitate the Arab Spring that has rapidly changed, right? Twitter is completely different now, um, and looking for, um, supporting those. News media, social media that are more aligned with how we think in terms of being fair and I, I should just sort of also say that the nonprofit sector is as diverse as the for-profit sector and that the federalist society is the nonprofit sector right part so um whether we just say the nonprofit sector as a whole needs to do something we are divided in our sector as well as to what we believe. Um, is fair and what we believe is true, um, but I do think there’s just more commonalities than partisan big corporation and billionaires tell us, um, what our commonalities are. I think we have much more in common with what we want, um, but the media that’s being controlled by the, the industrial complex is telling us something different. Mhm. Amy, you want to leave us with uh with your final thoughts for a minute or two and then we’ll uh I’ll turn to Gene and uh we’ll close. I think my only final thoughts from our conversation today are 12 things. It is very hard, so, you know, if you haven’t had a good cry yet today, this is your moment, like, I see you. It’s really fucking hard. And you’re not alone, right? Like there, not that you N0 would answer all of your questions, but there are so many intermediary organizations, whether that’s a state nonprofit association, um, you know, organizations like N10 that are on a specific topic like technology, but there’s so many resourcing organizations. That exist. To enable you to not figure all this out by yourself. And don’t fall into the trap that I think is, is very clearly laid for all of us to think we are in it alone because then we’re not resourced, we’re not supported, we don’t have a lot of faith in ourselves, right? And then we don’t maybe grow some power. So don’t fall into that trap. Don’t think that you are alone. Find whatever resourcing organization or, you know, collaborative or coalition or whatever you want. But don’t try to have all the answers yourself because like we’re all broken humans that definitely don’t know what all the answers are. So know that it is super hard, but you’re not alone, and we’ll figure it out. Tony will answer your questions. Um, and Tony is one of those resourcing, um, people or hubs, but that’s that’s, I think, all I can say to wrap it up. All right, well, Gene, before we turn to you, uh, I, I already know what I’m gonna say on Tony’s take two for this show, which is gonna be uh uh an infomercial for the nascent nonprofit activist group that, uh, you are, you are, you both joined us for the first meeting, uh, we’ve only had one other meeting since and uh if folks want to join us there, they will have by now already heard my, uh, My explanation of what we’re doing and how to join us on uh Tony’s Take two. So that, that’s my parting and, and you are not alone and there is, uh, I can recommend a group because I’m co-hosting it that uh will prove to you that we’re in this together. Jane I, I echo everything both of you have said about collaboration. Now is the time to join those who have similar values, um, who value your mission, um, talk to your funders, uh, as well, um, get them aligned with what the stories are, uh, of, of what. Problems you may be going through and what solutions you might have to to suggest um keep your boards engaged, keep your staff and beneficiaries engaged so you you’re acting together and be really informed um as as you go through this. This is a period. Um, and things are constantly changing, so just sort of to to know your adaptability, um, value that and make sure that you are allocating risk as well as your resources. So when you’re, when you have talk about risk tolerances, you’ve got to decide where you’re gonna sort of be more risk tolerant and where you’re going to be more risk averse and on the simple compliance stuff, be risk averse, like make sure you’re compliant. Gene Takagi, you, you want legal assistance, legal advice. A legal resource, uh, in our, in our time. Follow nonprofitlawblog.com. You’ll find Gene at GTech. Amy Sample Ward, you’ll find them on Blue Sky as Amy Sample Ward. Thank you very much, Gene. Thank you very much, Amy. Thanks, Tony. Thank you, Tony. Thank you, Amy. Bye. Bye. Next week, Julia Campbell returns for a social media chat. If you missed any part of this week’s show. I do beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. DonorBox, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. I love that alliteration. I knew it. I knew you were gonna come. I thought maybe you would say, no, he’s not gonna do it again this week. No, I knew it. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.