Tag Archives: 25NTC

Nonprofit Radio for September 1, 2025: Your Emergency Marketing Plan & Your More Diverse Board

 

Sarah Allen, Julia Molinaro & Michelle Shen: Your Emergency Marketing Plan

Our panel helps you prepare for, and respond to, emergencies with your digital marketing and fundraising. They also help you steward your new donors. They’re Sarah Allen from BRAC USA, along with Julia Molinaro and Michelle Shen, with The Purpose Collective. (This is part of our coverage of the 2025 Nonprofit Technology Conference.)

Jonathan Meagher-Zayas: Your More Diverse Board

Board diversity remains a challenge and Jonathan Meagher-Zayas wants to support you in diversifying. See the difference between, “We welcome everyone” and “We created this space with you in mind.” He’s got recruitment and retention strategies and explains how you can leverage technology. Jonathan is at Equity Warrior Strategies. His shared resources are Change Model; 5 Domains of Anti-oppressive Leadership; and DEI research. (This is also from our #25NTC coverage.)

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d be thrown into neurochoroiditis if I saw that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, to tell us what’s up this week. Hey Tony, we’re wrapping up our 2025 nonprofit technology conference coverage. First, Your emergency marketing plan. Our panel helps you prepare for and respond to emergencies with your digital marketing and fundraising. They also help you steward your new donors. They are Sarah Allen from BAC USA along with Julia Molinaro and Michelle Chen, both with the Purpose Collective. Then Your more diverse board, board diversity remains a challenge, and Jonathan Mahars Dias wants to support you in diversifying. See the difference between we welcome everyone. And we create this space with you in mind. He’s got recruitment and retention strategies and explains how you can leverage technology. Jonathan is at Equity Warrior Strategies. On Tony’s take 2. Thank you and 10, and Kate and I are together this week. So I’m, she is in the, she’s actually in the Podfather seat because she does most of the talking for this, these, uh, this part that we put together, uh, into the show together. So I’m standing and so I probably, I probably don’t sound so good, but, uh, I’m here, we’re here together, together. Here is your emergency marketing plan. What Hello and welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 25 NTC. This interview is kicking off the 3rd day, Friday, of the conference. We’re at the Baltimore Convention Center, and our coverage of 25 NTC is sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. With me now are Sarah Allen, Julia Molinaro, and Michelle Shen. Welcome. Thank you. Thanks for having us pleasure. Uh, Sarah is communications manager at BA BA BAC USA. Julia Molinaro is digital marketing director at the Purpose Collective, and Michelle Shen, digital marketing consultant at the Purpose Collective. All right, welcome. Thanks again. I know I said. You’re very welcome. Glad to talk to you in the morning. We’re talking about, uh, emergency marketing plans. Your session title is one less thing to worry about in a Crisis Prep your emergency marketing plan. Um, let’s start close here. Sarah, why don’t you just give us an overview of the topic you’ve done your session already? Yeah, we were first session of the week. give us an overview. Yeah, so, um, I work at Brack we’re a big international NGO um focused on poverty related programs and recently we ran a big emergency campaign this past summer, um, in response to some really devastating floods in Bangladesh that were some of the worst floods they’ve had in 3. Decades um so we worked really closely with uh the purpose collective Julia and Michelle to kind of launch a really comprehensive marketing plan um work on you know trying to attract new donors and also um kind of convert them steward them and keep them in our world and so our session kind of went through that case study. Um, did a little bit of background on, you know, how you could set up your emergency marketing strategy, and we shared a checklist with all the resources and the processes that we used, um, in order to kind of launch our emergency response. So OK, let’s be sure to email me the link in the show notes. OK. Um, so Sarah, is this a plan that you had prepared in advance? Did you have an emer this is, uh, one less thing to worry about in a crisis. Did you have this set up in advance? Yeah, so, um, a few years back we had, you know, another emergency, um, the Rohingya refugee crisis that impacted our work and, um, brought in a ton of donors, not. You know, kind of on accident we didn’t really do anything but we got this big mention in the New York Times totally broke our donation systems. So in response to that we kind of set up this emergency marketing strategy over the last few years and this past summer was really like the first big test of that checklist and that strategy and so. Um, you know, it was our first time testing it. We’ve kind of been refining it since then and um used it a couple of times since, so, um, we’ve kind of, we’re starting to not perfect it but you know, we’re getting, getting to use it more and kind of refining it over time. OK. Um, Julia, let’s, I’m just kinda going through your, uh, your session description, um, so basically we’re talking about preparing for emergency. So an emergency marketing plan, why don’t you kick us off with what what belongs in your emergency marketing plan. Yeah, so just to to back up a step and frame it, we wanted to bring this session because emergencies are. They’re happening a lot more they’re increasing in frequency but then also intensity so because of climate change, especially and then also political climate, economic disasters, global conflicts, um, we’re seeing a lot more of these crises and they’re more intense and we’re more aware of them, right, because we have our phones, news 24/7, social media, we’re so aware that they’re happening. And so of course it’s a big challenge for nonprofits because there’s 300 million people right now who need humanitarian aid but then also this huge opportunity to connect those people who are finding out about the crisis on social media and the news with an opportunity to do good and so the parts of the marketing plan. We start by preparing um the things you can get done now before any crisis is even on the horizon so thinking about yeah where people are finding you so that’s Google ads Facebook ads, news articles, social media people learn about the crisis exactly yeah where are people learning about that crisis yeah so yeah news, social media, Google ads Facebook ads, what else would you add to that? Yeah I mean yeah advertising I mean billboards, it could be news coverage, it can be partner organizations it can be events it can really be anything for your organization um I think it’s important for every organization to think about their reach, how they’re connecting or how supporters are learning about any emergency that they have going on um and to ensure that they have a presence on each of those in each of those places. OK, right, you wanna, you wanna be where your folks are I mean hopefully you already are. But you wanna I guess reinforce this in your in your emergency plan, right. And when you’re kind of thinking about those channels where folks are, you know what you can kind of do in advance is set up some templates maybe you know you have a really big email list and that’s where most of your gifts come in maybe set up an emergency email template where you could drop in photos you could drop in stats, um, same with ads or maybe you wanna have some emergency graphics that you could adapt on social or other channels. So those are some of the kind of checklist items that we have in that pre-plan section. Um, that you can kind of get started on ahead of time. OK, right, uh, let’s, I don’t want to just keep going, uh, you know, Sarah, Julia, Michelle, Sarah, Julia, Michelle, because that’s the way they’re seated. So I’m gonna go to Michelle. Um, what else? All right, so, uh, once we know what, what platforms, what apps, etc. what, what channels are folks are gonna be in, so those are the ones we’re gonna use in our emergency plan as we’re executing the plan in a, in the midst of a crisis, right? That’s where we’re gonna, you know, that’s where our folks are, that’s where we’re gonna be. And presumably we already, like I said, presumably we already are there. But the crisis are the channels we’re OK now. Yeah, so I think we covered um when when an emergency happens that’s a little bit unpredictable but we know organizations are going to face are going to face crisis um so while the the when we may not know that exact moment, um we do know that it’s going to happen and we can plan ahead based on some of these templates or um preparing some content uh that’s ready to go or easy to. Um, prepare once that emergency does strike, um, the where, uh, where we’re connecting with our audience hopefully we have a presence here already and we’re just prepared for, um. Using assets when that emergency does happen um and to make our audience as aware as possible I would say the last piece of this is like what? what are you sharing with that audience um hopefully you’re keeping your audience as informed as possible about the situation unfolding with whatever crisis you’re responding to. Um, it’s really important to be, uh, accurate in what you’re sharing, um, telling stories that you have permission to tell, um, emergencies in nature are hectic, they’re stressful, um, they’re unfolding really quickly and for the folks or you know whoever is experiencing that emergency it’s a really challenging time and we wanna make sure that we’re not contriving or exaggerating an emergency but in fact. We’re um sharing an accurate uh depiction of what’s happening uh because likely your supporters are um they’re coming to you for information you might be their first touch point in what’s happening in any specific area uh so it’s it’s crucial that it’s as accurate as possible and it’s yeah with permission uh to share all of these stories and all of these updates from from that emergency responding to. And I think the second half of what is um how you’re following up with your supporters so once they have taken action, once they’ve made a donation, once they’ve joined in to support uh in responding to this emergency um how are you stewarding them? How are you following up? How are you keeping them informed um we’re gonna we’re gonna get to that because we don’t wanna just raise it as a question we’re gonna get answers because I don’t want you holding out on nonprofit radio. So we’re gonna, but thank you. I’m, I’m sorry, Michelle, um, for ticking off things and we’re gonna go into more detail. Um, I want to ask, turn to you, Julia about permission. So Michelle mentioned, you know, what do you have permission to share? How are you, how do you get permission? Sarah said, you have some, hopefully you have some elements prepared. I mean, that’s hard too though. You don’t know where a flood’s gonna happen. You don’t know. I mean, it could be Bangladesh, it could be Cambodia, you know, so I don’t, maybe we’ll come back to that. How do you know what to have in advance? But what about permission? How do you get this permission that Michelle’s referring to in the midst of a crisis? Yeah, so permission from people whose stories you’re telling. Yeah, so it’s really tricky, of course, because it’s this vulnerable situations and we don’t wanna exploit people who are in a really tough um situation so a lot of the times we’ll rely on like an organization staff. On the ground staff members who already set up um like in Brack’s example in Bangladesh and they were experiencing this crisis but you had a presence in Bangladesh, yeah, we’re actually headquartered in Bangladesh um and yeah it’s kind of an interesting flipping the typical model upside down. So here in the US I’m at Brock USA we’re kind of the 501c3 affiliate, but we are much smaller and mostly fundraising and. Um, advocacy and communications, so headquartered in Bangladesh in Dhaka, yeah, and then we have a presence kind of all over the country as well as 13 other countries around South Asia and Africa. OK, so then Julia, I guess the permission wasn’t too hard to get. Right, if it’s a staff member, they are often likely to give you permission and it’s a really they can still share it. The organization is if it makes sense for them to respond to that emergency um sharing even sharing photos a photo can tell a story so if you don’t have those um direct connection set up and. You don’t want to go up to someone who just lost their home in a flood and ask them to be sharing in those vulnerable moments so but um yeah maybe they’re OK with the photo or um when you don’t when you’re not feeling good about sharing um people’s faces and names you can take photos of the situation and um tell the stories through the updates graphics I mean can you get permission. that might be there like yeah we’ve done that before done kind of like the Getty images or things like that but um also you know a big challenge we have is maybe the staff that we have there they are, you know, front line humanitarian workers they’re not coms people their priority isn’t getting stories or photos and so we found a couple like creative ways to work around that, um, and kind of asked our. Our staff to even just send us like grainy phone photos of like the scenery or phone photos of people you know delivering some aid even if participants aren’t in it and that kind of helps us you know not have to get that participant permission not have to get these more elaborate stories um and then right at the beginning of the crisis when you’re first fundraising that kind of content can still be really useful you know we can turn it into a lot of different things um we have some of these ideas in our you know emergency. marketing plan resources but you know we did like 10 striking photos of the Bangladesh flood emergency as a blog and then we packaged it as a gift and put it on social media and sent it as an email and it was all really like photos of scenery, not so much necessarily photos of participants and you could just see kind of the devastating impact of the floods on homes and infrastructure and that was really effective even though we didn’t really have that ability to necessarily collect really nice stories at the get go. Um, I think that’s one way you can kind of get around that challenge. OK, OK, um, what else, what else, what else belongs in, well, no, Sarah, you had your chance. So, uh, Julia, Michelle, what else belongs in our emergency marketing plan before we get to the follow up and stewardship that Michelle mentioned? What else should be in here? What, what should we be thinking about in advance? Think you can be in advanced thinking about how you’re gonna make a really compelling ask so after you’ve captured people’s attention they found out about this emergency news all those places we talked about you have a a very short window of an opportunity to convince them to give to your organization to to respond, to take action. And so the way we think about making that ask is in three components you need to be building that sense of urgency and the fact that it’s a crisis is building a lot of urgency for you as long as you’re sharing information and updates and then um create some empathy in your reader and so that is that storytelling piece even through photos um getting people to get that emotional component of I care about this I care that people are experiencing this I wanna help. And then um the third point that is crucial in making your fundraising ask is having one clear call to action and it needs to be super specific, super simple, easy to understand we’re not asking people to do one of 5 actions we’re just asking them to do one thing, donate, and here’s how and here’s why. Yeah, exactly right, and that landing page it should be written at a. 6th to 8th grade reading level so it’s a 6th grader can understand what you’re asking of them and it uses a lot of you focused language. It’s talking directly to your reader. It’s not saying we’re doing this, we’re responding, we’re helping. It’s you have the power to help. You can make a difference. You have a place in this response. Michelle I could have asked Sarah, but she had a lot of a lot of mic so I’m trying to spread these things out um um. So Brack had to create the landing page on on the fly, right in the in the midst of the crisis because it’s a landing page devoted to the Bangladesh flood, right? So you gotta, I don’t know, is that what the purpose collective come through or? Yeah, I mean you can’t you? Yeah, I think what you’re saying is that there is a lot of things that you have to get through during an emergency. There’s this long checklist of things that you need to work through and whether it’s the direct team or the purpose collective team, I think we all take a part in tackling all of these things to to get live and to uh present to supporters that may be coming into our website or seeing our ads or whatever it might be. Um, yeah, I mean it’s urgent and I mean this this checklist gets as detailed as like set your budget in advance, you know, if you know you’re going to run ads during a time of emergency, that’s something you can do early on. You can get approval for um ad budget that your organization might want to spend because the last thing you want during an emergency is contacting uh. to make sure that a certain amount of spend is approved so you can start running these ads we go to accounts payable, you know they’re not gonna approve. OK. So all these things you’re talking about are the resources that one of you will send me for our listeners. OK, OK this is good this is good detail. Yeah, so, uh, alright, let’s go back to you Sarah then uh what other what other assets have to be created on the fly landing page. Yeah, I mean it’s really thinking about like every single channel and then what can you do there so home page on the website maybe a pop up or conversion design on you know all the other pages on the site um thinking about yeah. Sorry, conversion design would be like either a pop up or you know some sort of bar that’s at the top or bottom of the page um that kind of overlays on top of your normal web page that will have you know some sort of message and link so it’ll have you know a call to action to go to the donate page or going to go to the landing page for the emergency so that you know setting that up on your site. Um, thinking about, you know, your actual donate platform, making sure you have then a donate form set up it’s connected to your, um, you know, CRM platform, whatever that may be, um, and then also, you know, looking at all of your social media channels that we like to do is, uh, change our bios and links on all of the platform. And even our header images for the platforms that do have a header image uh notifying people about the emergency so when you look at our page it’s clearly you know kind of branded for that emergency and then doing one post that’s sort of like the master post maybe on each channel that has a really compelling graphic. Showing the emergency and really clearly just tell supporters how they could support and get to the landing page um usually we try to pin those posts on whatever channels we can so those are some of the areas setting up an email template for an appeal um maybe if your organization has like a media officer. Um, you can work with them to be sending out pitches or alerting journalists, um, that you’re working, so there’s lots of different areas you can work. You said you said Brat got very good coverage in the New York Times for your, for your response that yeah we did this was a few years back, um, a different emergency, but it’s definitely can be really impactful and so you know this time we were trying to work with journalists and. Send out just updates, you know, here’s what Brack is doing here’s our landing page a lot of things places like CNN and others will often publish lists that are, you know, how to help if the emergency does get enough media pick up and so you can reach out to those places and try to get your organization listed as, you know, a way people can help so there’s lots of channels you could work and it all kind of comes. That’s why the checklist, it’s helpful to have that checklist we’ll share the checklist. OK, alright, let’s move on now after, you know, this is, this is the very unfortunate part of disasters that press moves on, the world’s attention moves on and the people are suffering for years, you know, recovering for years and, um, but we, we, so you do move away from an emergency phase. I don’t know. So how long did you stay? I, I guess I’m, I’m going to Sarah again. Uh, how long, how long did you make Bangladesh, the flood a focus of, let’s say just the home page. Let’s just use that as a, as a proxy. How long did that I think. Maybe you know 2 months or so when the most urgent immediate needs um and the timing of it was, you know, as we were shifting into the year-end fundraising season this happened in August, so maybe 2 months later as we were starting to shift into the year-end fundraising season. We took that down but we were continuing to, you know, even last month we posted a new update, you know, 6 months on here’s what’s happening here’s what we accomplished, and here’s, you know, the people that still need long term support so we’re still trying to make sure we get it out there and for people who did support um that they know that we’re still thinking about it um and I I guess. In in during the crisis, I mean you’re assuring people that can you say 100% of your donation goes to Bangladesh relief can you say that? Yeah, so I think that’s something that you need to kind of negotiate with your organization in advance as well and it’s definitely important to have that kind of like go no go to even know can you start fundraising um is your organization responding to the emergency? Um, for us we were able to do, you know, directly grant all of that money straight to the Bangladesh Relief Fund, so we had it restricted like that, but depending on your organization, um, you might choose to do it differently. OK, so let’s go after now, Michelle, you brought up the, uh, stewardship. now presumably we’ve got thousands. donors, uh, new to the organization, um, how do we start to keep them engaged in a in a journey I guess your your CEO, I know, likes to, I’m gonna say the same thing. She’s coming. 9:45. So she’s right after you all. You, you are overexposed. You got 5 don’t you have 4 members are there to be right now it’s just 30, so it’s 100%. We’re so lucky. Is the purpose, but in any case, um, so yeah, um I use her name synonymous with email. I was trying to say Patty by email. That’s her middle name. Um, Patty talks about the email journey. I know we’ve, she and I have talked about that previous NTC, uh, but so you don’t have to take the email journey path, Michelle, but, um, in fact, I think it’s kind of, it’s overplayed. I think it’s tired. I think it’s no, it’s not. It’s still important. Um, what, uh. What do we do to keep these folks engaged? Yeah, that’s a great question. I think you have this flood of new donors you want to um thank them first and foremost for their support when you um had a specific need uh they showed up and I think gratitude is the first message that you want to share as soon as possible um we talked about yeah this this. journey, but the the the first part of this journey is um making sure that they feel appreciated. They feel seen that you’ve acknowledged their, their gift and their contribution and assuming it’s that’s gonna be I think a receipt can be instant and automatic that is. Yeah, how they’re set up and I think within 24 hours um you can send a thank you email either either immediately within the first hour or instantly sometimes if it’s immediate, it gets mixed with that donation receipt so you may want to give it a little bit more space um but a a thank you email um from the organization someone at the organization. Um, even better if it’s a plain textile email it looks like it was really personalized um for the supporter, almost like someone opened up a Gmail, uh, email, and composed it themselves. Exactly. Um, I think that that first part is just making sure that someone feels seen and that they support has not gone gone unnoticed. 24 hours, right, but you’re, you’re caution, you know, maybe not immediately because, well, then it also kind of defeats the, the urgent, you know, like I, I personally composed it, you know, it comes within 2 minutes. OK. 24 hours looks uh looks personally composed, doesn’t have graphic elements. It’s just a sincere. I don’t know who did it come from, it was from our director of communications I believe the first email, yeah, and to make it even more convincing, we’ll put a filter or we recommend putting a filter that it only sends Monday to Friday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Because if somebody, if the way that they donated on a Friday night and it’s a little bit unconvincing if they get a personalized email on Saturday at 10 p.m. so that filter in trying to make this. OK so it’s a good first step and then we recommend um following up pretty consistently after that first email so maybe a story of impact from the emergency responding to maybe an update again we talked about. Um, a lot of these supporters, maybe their first touch point in, uh, what’s happening and unfolding in this emergency is you, so being able to share um a pretty robust update or just like a firsthand experience from a team member or what you’re seeing. Um, it’s happening, um, that’s a great message to to send, um, for Brack, uh, they also use this as an opportunity to learn more about the supporter, um, so understanding how the supporter found out about Brack through this emergency, so was it news coverage, um, was it, was it one of the ads that they were running? Was it uh through a partner organization? And this was done through a survey, uh, creating a survey and saying, you know, how did you learn about Brock during this time, um, and also in that survey was an opportunity to, uh, share more areas of work, um, that that Brack covers so the the the different programmatic areas, um, of the organization asking supporters, you know, which of these are of interest to you, um, and I think that’s a gentle uh but clear way to um. To open, open that supporter up to kind of the breadth of Brack’s work. And uh Julia, what kind of open rates do we see for these um maybe not the, the very first one that’s probably near 100% I would think OK, but as the, as the journey continues, I don’t know, are the open rates declining, you know, like the second is. We tend to see overall you see a slight decline from emails if there’s 5 emails, emails 1 to 5, you’ll see that start to come down a little bit towards the end because people are most excited right when they make their donation and the day after they’re still pretty fired up about you and this cause and. And it’s as we move on with our lives a little bit that tends to fade, but they’re still almost about double the open rates that you can expect from a typical email solicitation or newsletter so it’s between 30 and 50% is typically what we see from these email welcome journey emails. Um, uh, Sarah, something else occurred to me. What, when do you start? and I’m going back in the emergency now, uh, when do you start to ask for donations? Is it, is it with your very first messaging about the crisis, uh, if, if you want to rush rush immediate support, or do you delay a few hours or how do you manage that. It really depends on your situation, but for us, you know, we are the US arm the headquarters is in Bangladesh and so it’s really up to the headquarters and you know the country where whatever emergency might be happening to make the call um you know a that they’re actually responding and B that they need outside funds you know from. The US or whatever other countries that we’re fundraising in so sometimes it takes a little bit of time to actually get that approval and so you know if you’re in that situation where you can’t immediately start fundraising what we like to do is start still at least sharing some updates and posts you know on our social channels or other channels saying you know. Such and such emergency is happening. um, our thoughts are really with our participants and our staff at this time who are impacted, you know, so sharing some things that might not be a fundraising ask but still putting it top of mind for people so that they know, you know, we’re aware of what’s going on, um, we’re there and we’re we’re a source of information for you and you know to kind of stay tuned for, you know, the next steps OK thank you alright um alright so going back to after now, Michelle let’s. Follow up on um something that on what on our journey um you had made the point that uh you’re you’re doing some simple surveying like how did you hear about the crisis first from us what what channel, um, what, what, and then later in the journey, what parts of our work, you know, is most are most interesting to you? I want to make the point that when you’re surveying, you need to be preserving the responses and then using the information, right? If somebody says. That uh the Middle East is actually more important to me than than Central Asia, but I, I gave to the Central Asian crisis, but in Bangladesh, but I’m actually more interested in the Middle East. You need to honor that going forward, right? Totally, yeah, we don’t want to ask any survey questions that aren’t going to be used at all or just kind of resting there, um, that wouldn’t be helpful for the organization, nor would it be a good use of your supporters time to to fill something out that it’s actually counterproductive I guess they may remember. I checked the Middle East, you know, why do I get, why do I keep getting these Asians Central and South Asia, uh, appeals, you know, and information. OK, so, um, yes, you need for me and I, I do plan to giving fundraising that comes up a lot with birthdays. People like to ask. I see a lot of organizations like to ask for birthdays, but and then and they save it in their CRM then they don’t do anything with it. They’re not sending birthday, birthday reminders or even month of or certainly day of, you know, they just preserve it’s like, OK, now we know they’re. and their age we can and to what end so when you survey the data to favor to the right yeah absolutely and you know it’s an opportunity to to build a stronger relationship, even asking communication preferences and things like that um that’s all a way that hopefully builds a really like a long term relationship with their supporters if you honor that data that you’re you’re receiving. That’s a good point. Um, what, what else? So we, we kind of talked about the, the 5 emails and, uh, well, let’s space them out a little bit again, Patty and I did talk about this, I think probably 2 NTCs. She has definite like uh frames for the for the journey. Can you remind us? Yeah, so you can have. Emails as you want in this journey we often see them being between 3 and 5 emails in length from that first gratitude email all the way to the last and our general recommendation is to send them all within 2 to 4 weeks of when that initial trigger or when that initial action took place. um like Julia said, we don’t want to wait until too far after that donation in this case. Um, because folks are, you know, uh, not losing interest, but their initial enthusiasm for the cause that they support, we really want to maximize that, that time frame as much as possible. OK, OK, um, we can still spend some more time before, uh, Patty is scheduled and then we’ll have to of course cut it short immediately her time is precious. I don’t wanna, I don’t want to delay her a second more than necessary. No, we’re fine, uh, because we started early, so we still have some more time. What else? Uh, maybe some questions that came from, about some of the questions that came from your session? Any, uh, interesting memorable, provocative questions you want to share? Um, someone asked about, so the last email of the journey we typically include another donation ask and so you had mentioned Tony earlier the need for long term support because people care a lot when the disaster happens but it can take years and years to fully recover um and so we like to include that last that last email in the welcome series is often an ask for them. Become monthly donors and and it it starts with a lot of gratitude. It’s a month ago you made this really generous donation you fueled recovery efforts and it’s gonna take a long time for this community to rebuild. Will you donate just $5 or $10 a month to fuel this ongoing recovery efforts and so we really and that is also a plain text email so it feels really personal and um. A lot still a lot of gratitude in that ask, um, recognizing that they gave a month ago and somebody had asked about what the conversion rate is of that email and to be honest it’s it’s a big ask to a monthly donation so it is not that high, but we still really recommend including it because it’s super valuable to get a monthly donor who might stay with you for years and years um and. Maybe this is too, I, I like detail though. I, I, I hope listeners do too. I think they do. They, they’ve been listening for a while. Um, I hope they do. When, when you, so obviously there’s a link or QR maybe to to get to the to the donation page. Does that donation page does that page from that email asking for sustaining sustain or giving, does that still give the option of making it a one time gift or go to a landing page that’s only prohibit only permits monthly. Still giving them the option to one time donate, but it’s. Defaulting to monthly, so it helps encourage. OK. Yeah, we had one good question that was around, you know how many of these people actually stick around because we know that emergency donors, uh, you know, they’re. More likely to give one time they’re less likely to you know keep a long term relationship with you and your organization um so I think it’s a really valid question definitely we saw you know I mean it’s still early but with our past emergencies that we’ve done we’ve seen you know much less much lower retention rates so I think that’s why obviously the welcome journey is important. Um, but also continuing to kind of feed those people a little bit of a tailored diet, you should, you know, have them segmented in your email system and be sending them maybe throughout the year and season, uh, you know, a couple of months after the emergency we sent them more Bangladesh focused stories, more climate change focused stories, um, things that we thought might. Be a little bit more interesting to them as a past donor of these slots in Bangladesh rather than kind of sending them you know a story on financial inclusion from Rwanda that we might be sending to other members of our broader list um so I think that really helped us we saw actually quite a few people convert to become unrestricted donors during the year end season who had only ever given. You know, as one time emergency donors, so I think it’s something that, you know, to your point they’ve kind of showed you this interest in this one area and maybe if you also have survey data you could kind of incorporate that you want to kind of continue to feed them that and slowly introduce them to your other work rather than just letting them do this really nice welcome journey and then dumping them on your regular list where they’re just gonna get everything. OK. Any anything more about uh the the stewardship, you know, the what it what you said it’s very low. Folks joining, I don’t know, so a year later, what do you do you know what the percentage of initial donors from the Bangladesh flooded with you. Well, it hasn’t been a full year. It’s been a, you know, it was last August, so I think this year end season will be really interesting to see. We’ve already seen a lot of them convert since then. Um, especially during the year end season, um, make a second gift, um, either unrestricted or maybe a follow-up gift to the floods. So this coming year it’s really gonna be interesting to see how much they stick around, um, for, you know, the next season. So that’s something we’ll definitely be tracking encouraging so far. You know there’s other other emergencies in the past where we’ve not done quite as comprehensive of a response or comprehensive of, you know, follow up and stewardship after where we see the vast majority of people, you know, never make a gift again, um, especially an unrestricted gift so you all need to start sponsoring this show. I want to talk to Patty Breach about that. Uh, I’m tired of doing this free, uh, free, free promotion. You all know what’s going on, um, all right, we can still spend some more time together, um. Any other questions that Michelle go ahead Julia. I somebody asked you, Michelle afterwards about uh what an emergency would look like for them because they were uh a nonprofit that responded to legal changes and I just want to note that for listeners maybe they are not in a place where they’re set up to respond to natural disasters like we’ve been talking about. But crisis fundraising still applies and we encourage listeners to think about what their emergency that is real and they’re in a position to respond to could be, so maybe it’s a pandemic and they’re in a place to be giving healthcare providers resources or maybe they’re an animal shelter and they can save fluffy from the. Shelter or um yeah, maybe they’re a legal organization and can take some actions. So we are talking about natural disasters but the same rules apply to any emergency that your organization might be in a position to respond to. Yeah, I like comparing it to almost. A like a SWOT analysis uh if folks have done that before like strength, weaknesses, opportunities threats for an organization if you kind of zoom in on the threats for your organization, I that’s almost like the preliminary prep for what you can anticipate like what could happen to your organization that you need to respond to and how would you message that to an external audience? How would you share that more broadly and bring folks into the fold so that they’re able to. Um, join your organization and responding to that. Um, so yeah, if we’re looking at it like before the disaster happens, before the emergency happens, before the crisis happens, um, what are those potentials exactly, exactly. We will be sending you those freebies. is also in addition to that checklist, we have an email welcome journey template so you can use that and tailor it to your emergency. OK, why don’t you just take out a little. Motivating because you’re here you know you have a have a plan in place uh just remind you of that. Yeah, for sure I mean I think the results end up speaking for themselves, you know, past emergencies we responded to. Maybe we got a lot of interest at first but we couldn’t retain those folks and you know we’re seeing such a stronger response this time around with an emergency that got you know a lot less media coverage and left so I think it’s really valuable it’s a really valuable opportunity to generate new leads and and connect new people with your mission who might be interested in supporting more broadly so. Um, even though it can be a big time investment to respond to an emergency and fundraise around an emergency, um, it’s definitely worth the investment and I think having partners like Purpose that can, you know, jump in, um, when it’s a really busy time to help was really invaluable and just having that plan set up in advance. And prepping everything in advance so um even if you know you can kind of squeeze in a little bit of prep here and there over the next few months, um, you’ll be that much more ready for when an emergency inevitably probably will affect your organization. thank you. That’s Sarah Allen, communications manager at BACSA. We also heard from Julia Molinaro and Michelle Shen both at the Purpose Collective, Julia digital marketing director and Michelle digital marketing consultant. All right, thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you, thank you so much and thank you for being with Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of the 2025 nonprofitology conference where we’re sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. It’s time for Tony’s take too. Thank you, Kate. Sitting in my seat, uh, I have to stand now, I guess, uh, uh kneel, uh, it’s like I’m proposing cause we’re together. So we’re we’re at the same desk. Uh, she’s in my seat, and here I am kneeling next to her. Thank you, Nan. We’re wrapping up our coverage of the 25 NTC, the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference, year after year. This is our 11th year with N10 bringing nonprofit Radio to the nonprofit technology conference, wherever it is throughout the country. As you know, last year, uh, well this year, earlier this year, it was, um, it was Baltimore. I’m grateful that. N10 recognizes the value that nonprofit radio brings. Uh, so I appreciate the partnership. You know, they understand that we’re expanding the reach of their Speakers, their, their session speakers by playing their interviews on the show with our 13,000 plus listeners each week, so that expands every speaker’s audience who, who sits down for an interview with me. And, and I appreciate the value that N0 brings because they give us a great space, visibility for the show in front of uh uh uh a conference of 2, 2500 people. So we appreciate the value that each of us brings. To the partnership. And uh there’s, there’s value in working with people who see your value, and including year after year. So, my thanks to CEO Amy Sample Ward, who we all know very well. And the entire team at uh at N10 for partnering with us. Year after year, I’m looking forward to 26 NTC which is Oh gosh, I forgot where it is. Well, I’ll be there. Uh, well, the show will be there wherever, wherever the heck it is. I just can’t remember where it is right now. Thank you, Anton. Very grateful. That is Tony’s take too. Kate, swinging the mic back to you. I just want to say I’m not forcing him to kneel on the floor. He offered up his Podfather chair and I was like, Oh, it is such an honor to be in the podfather space. In person We’ve got boo but loads more time. Here is your more diverse board. I Welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 25 NTC, the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference. This interview actually, uh, closes out our 25 NTC coverage. We’ve been sponsored during the conference by Heller Consulting Technology Services for nonprofits. With me now is Jonathan Maharza. He’s founder and chief strategist at Equity Warrior Strategies. Jonathan, welcome to nonprofit radio. Thanks for having me, Tony. You’ve been listening for many years, yeah, when I first, I think, uh, in graduate school many years ago was finding like spaces, I think 2015 and resources for uh nonprofit professionals and this was popped up and I remember listening. Very often of just all the great speakers that you had on the content just process how to continue my leadership growth in this field. Thank you so much. I’m so glad we’ve been with you for 2015, 10 years that’s outstanding. I’m glad. I create the podcast and people who are nonprofits. Oh. I’m glad that’s happening for you. Awesome, yeah, definitely many episodes over the years where you send it to clients or colleagues to give them ideas like, hey, go listen to this. This will help you process what’s going on with your organization at the moment right now. So thank you again, so honored to be here. I’m glad it’s a that’s what that’s that’s my goal. Alright, we’re talking about, uh, diversity on the board. Your session topic is why your board is not diverse and how to recruit in equitable ways. Uh, share a 30,000 ft view of, of your session first. Sure, so we board diversity is probably the number one issue that many boards face over time like the composition of the board, you know, board source regularly does research reminding themselves that board diversity is the issue and We wanted to really uh go full forward and let people know what the true issue is and it’s about really personal change mindsets so people um are really struggling with this topic and advancing with this because of their own mindset that might have related to how they should go about it too. So we take that approach and help them think about like changing their own personal mindset and then using anti-oppressive leadership framework on how to actually recruit more equitably. What, um, what’s the best way to to begin? Is it, should we, should we start with the changing of the personal mindsets of the, when we’re talking about personal mindset, we mean of board members, board members and leaders. OK, can we start there on the personal level I think so because, um, well, we have a great meme that we show in the presentation where you know a speaker asked this group of. Crowd and it’s like who wants change and everyone raises their hand and then the bottom says who wants to change and no one raises their hand too and it’s a great reminder that you were mentioning this tough topic of that too yet what are we doing internally to reshape our biases, think about how to approach this differently or change our mind, you know, shift our thinking to like why don’t people have diverse backgrounds. Why can’t we find them to why don’t they want to find us, you know, and kind of creating spaces on the board that intentionally uh welcomes people in mind. Um, that’s borne out in something you say in your session description that uh there’s a difference between we welcome everyone and we created this space with you in mind. Yeah, so, and we’re seeing that too. There’s a lot of great good intention people and they’re like, we love everyone, we’re so welcoming and I welcome those. I’m so grateful for those spaces. However, you know, there’s a difference when You’re saying that and you haven’t done the work intentionally to think about how are you uh restructuring uh your board so like the power is distributed equitably so like the new folks coming on don’t feel just like tokens, they actually have a voice on the board or you’re thinking about your meeting structures and agendas to actually make it engaging and fulfilling for people to be a part of it. Um, or you’re just like looking outside traditional spaces of what you’ve done so it challenges the mindset of like who actually is gonna be great on your board and we’re not just going for the folks that have access to wealth or access to um certain connections or just our own bias and perception of what an ideal board member is. Um, just to, uh, alert listeners, that you may hear some, uh, cacophony behind us. Uh, 25 NTC is coming down around us. There’s carts of, uh, furniture being wheeled away. Uh, they’re not gonna take out our electrical drop until, uh, until we finish with Jonathan, but, uh, there’s a little noise in the background, uh, as the, the, uh, the commons, it’s called the commons, this open area where that we we have our studio in. Uh, gets taken down around us, but that’s OK. Nonprofit radio perseveres doesn’t make a difference to us doesn’t make a difference to you, right? You don’t, no, not at all distracted might be distracted by a lackluster host but not by the furniture being that’s that’s what’s bringing me in and I’m just focusing in on it excellent, thank you. All right, so as a longtime listener, you know I’m, I’m digging into the details. So how do we start to, what what do we need to do. Maybe on on for ourselves and maybe what does the organization need to do to help change the personal, the personal mindset, not the organizational culture yet but what can the organization and the people do to change the personal mindsets on the board and the C-suite. Uh, my colleague Chrissy who couldn’t make it, uh, she has developed a personal change mindset framework, uh, literally labeled change, and it’s, uh, an acronym that kinda helps think about the process of going about internal change. So first is the confrontation to, you know, really. Acknowledge that you need to do things differently, you know, not all of us wake up and say, oh, we need to change our mindset tomorrow, you know, like we have to face that confrontation of what that looks like too, then we have to handle the feedback, bring awareness of the issue, do internal negotiations. Uh, going identify ways of going forward and then enact what we’re doing. So, um, we have, she has a great framework that we use to kind of just help walk people through to like process the initial like confrontation of like maybe I need to change and then processing the steps to go forward so that uh the change is inactable too, you know I see often where people are like oh I need to change and they jump forward to a solution and haven’t sat with the process. Uh, and understanding of their background of what’s happening or done the awareness building of like what they truly are are are are building on to sometimes we think we need to change and we’re, uh, changing, you know, the band-aid but not the true issue at hand, so really making sure that process. Includes uh tackling and addressing the true either bias or potential area of oppression or past experience that someone has that shaped you so that you are best prepared to then go about and use some tools to kind of recruit in more equitable ways. was that um was that uh or a strategy was that a resource that you could you email me the link, um, of course, yeah, um, bragging about Chrissy because she developed it has a great graphic called and literally it’s a process of personal change, um, and it uses, you know, change as an acronym to kind of spell out the steps on that tube, so happy to share that. OK, yeah, yeah, of course I’ll put you um. Alright, so that will help us with the, with the personal mindset, my personal mindset change. Um, how about the, uh, sort of the Like the board culture. So now, now if we’ve done our personal work, we’re now a board of, I don’t know, it could be anything from 4 to 25, um, how do we start to make this, uh, at the board at the board and organizational level? Yeah, um, so I use an anti-oppressive leadership framework to help us first identify where some of those issues might impact. our board and our organization so this comes from uh how we uh and I pose a series of questions that help us think about the various different ways. So I think about learning, I think about how your community talks about you, I think about how your board is structured, I think about just the personal relationships and dynamics that you have and then I think about how we personally, you know, show up and think about ourselves too. So usually those are ways to kind of help identify to say oh what is. Uh, the true, like where are we struggling in some areas and then what might an intervention be for that too? So do we need better training for the board because I don’t know any. There’s lots of great board resources out there, but not every board member comes in fully trained on what’s going on or understanding so that or is it uh being better prepared to be an ambassador for the organization so they’re going out to the community and understanding how the community talks about the organization or do we need to restructure or update our bylaws or uh rethink our strategies um or just improve relationship building. And you know, help people strengthen how they can better connect with individuals. Unfortunately we’ve seen a decline in people’s interpersonal relationship skills over the last several years of just being able to talk to someone about anything, yeah, in that way too as well and you know, um, any conflict comes up, you know, you might be risk avoidant or you might ignore it or it might be, you know, traumatic and you not want to address it. So how are we. Potentially, you know, embracing the diversity that comes in but supporting them to actually have the conversations, learn how, and structure some procedures in some way. So, uh, yeah, I’m happy to share that framework too because then it goes into identifying each of those different five domains and how you can think about, uh, some better strategies to develop your board to attract and retain the the the people representing your community you want to be on the board, yeah, OK. Um, let’s talk through the recruitment and, and we can probably get the retention strategies too, but you know, how are you, you know, part of your session topic is how to recruit in equitable ways. What what’s your advice there? Yeah, um, first, uh, empowering and activating your current board to be ambassadors, um, and not just saying, hey, go find people like really taking some time and some intentionality to say, OK, what are the strengths, passions, and connections of our current board members and how do we want to see that. Uh, be able to connect with new people too as well, so you know, understanding all that too and then using a board matrix and understanding the gaps on your board and then connecting board members to empower them to find the network connect in that way, build on that. Um, I also really think organizations should be really intentional about their community partnerships too, like if you’re doing referrals or. Uh, sharing shared resources with other nonprofits too. How are you connecting in the network is then expanding what that might look like for yourself to, uh, you know, broaden and expand your base to, um, in that way, um, and then as a formal fundraiser too, I think a lot of folks might overlook some of their donor data unless the donor is. You know, a high level one too like there could be a lot of. Uh, I, I, I, I don’t like the term mid-level, but like people who haven’t give at the high high level who haven’t had the opportunity to be invited into your organization yet that might have some of those characteristics you’ve already been engaged with too that you might be able to cultivate engage and help drive that engagement too so that might be, you know, um, some other ways. And kind of thinking about that too is sometimes they overlook the people already connected in your area too like how often have you looked at really the demographics of the people who following you on social media or who’s attended your events or who’s given to your annual campaign too and look at some of those folks and say they already know about you, how can you potentially either. Uh, tap them for future or be very clear on the type of people you’re looking for with that network too and help expand and empower them to kind of uh be ambassadors for you. These are great tactics you’re packed with in a in a very dense, uh, excellent, you know, listeners are gonna have to go back and like rewind, but that’s fine. There’s value there to hear it another time because there’s so much, um. Uh, leveraging tech, your, your session description says that using technology for equitable board recruitment. Yeah, um, I think in a bunch of more people can probably talk about accessibility engagement about tech a little bit better than me at this conference, but, um, we, you know, learning all the great ways that we’ve seen technology be able to utilize for better effective engagement, better effective um recruitment or organization or empowerment of folks too. Um, as well, like, for example, um, I think a lot of board meetings need to be redesigned of how they’re really structured in that way because I, the boards I’m working with what they really want their meetings to walk away with is better community building, better, uh, uh, information and better opportunities for the important generative discussions in that way too. Um, and if you have even more than 5 people sometimes and only have 15 minutes on the topic too as well, how are you gonna effectively gauge? So can you use a tool like Mentimeter or or Zoom to collect thoughts from everyone. In the limited time too so everyone still feels there a chance to be heard in that way, um, or share, uh, kind of that information in that sense. So stuff like that, um, I also think like uh being creative with uh sharing resources with your board on what makes sense, so if it’s your board port. Like using your website for board portals to organize to give autonomy for the board members to have access to the information or if it’s a Google Drive or Dropbox folder in that way, um, or you know using project management tools with your board, uh, cause they’re all volunteers so however they. Yeah unless they’re pretty organized themselves too, they might need, you know, support from the staff or the leadership on continuing their task too. So are we setting up like a SANA project board so that each board member is assigned what they’re supposed to do, it’s reminded and it kinda ensures some of that accountability that might be missing from just saying oh happening in between meetings in that sense. You mentioned one. that came up in another panel. It’s M E N T I M E N T I M E T E R. Yeah. Yeah. What do you, what, what can you do with that? Um it’s mostly a presentation um platform. I actually we use it in our session too, so like live presentations, people can feedback, you do polls and what that looks like, but you can set up meeting agendas in that way, especially if it’s virtual. Even in person too, I’ve used it in personal where you know you might pose a question to the board and you know a few board members might be the ones really eager to talk so they do that too but uh a couple of ones might need a little bit more time processing so they’ll they could pause a little bit and then share their answer after too as well or or they don’t want to speak up too so you can collect even live feedback. Um, during the time too, so people can build on that, um, or I’ve seen too is like using a tool to do like a ranking poll. So if you’re posing a decision for your board and say, hey, how much do you agree with this decision right now? Like this is what we’re voting on too on a scale of 1 to 5, you know, do that and and then vote 2 and then you can say, hey, who voted 3 right now? Can you share your perspective in that way too so people get a sense to, you know, hear from. Uh, different ones, so, um, just thinking about like ways to reimagine how you can better inform your board, empower them with the information that they need to make decisions and then lead into discussions to have effective decision making that’s a little bit more inclusive and reducing the dynamics of just a few people making that area. OK, um, what else did you cover in your session that that we haven’t covered here? Uh, that’s a good question. Um, I, we always share, uh, and we’ve done this session a few times. We’ve always shared like some trends or best practices, but I think knowing the NTC audience, everyone is pretty on board with some of this. So we shared a handful of resource, a research resource to just prove and remind ourselves too about how. Uh, there’s studies that show board diversity leads to better organizational performance. There’s, uh, studies that show that DEI, even with the political climate is still more popular and still centered recently, like, uh, a university in Wisconsin I believe earlier this year just did a study saying DEI is still favored, most people are doing it as well, um, or even kind of helping with um. Sharing some state resources too on like uh attorney generals or legal guidances and reminding people like hey this is still important, this is still. Legal embracing really positive for your organization so um and I don’t think any of our attendees or the folks here like question that too however we realize the part of change is we’re getting other people on board, so giving other folks to um a sense to uh be able to uh change our you know minds or or spark that confrontation for them too. nonprofit that you can have the 5, yeah, and then we’ll share the data. OK, 3 things you’re promising now. Yeah, of course. listener, so don’t let yourself down. Oh no, no, not at all. You don’t let your peers down. I wear many hats and one is social worker and giving resources like a key part of my identity. So like I have to bring that up to make sure. OK. You OK? Yeah, great. Thank you so much for having me. Thank you. That’s Jonathan. Founder and chief strategist at Equity Warrior Strategies, thank you very much again. Yeah, thanks for having me and thank you for being with Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 25 NTC. Uh, the hall just got quiet, like, uh, it’s still coming down, but there is a lull in the cacophony right now. But no matter, we’re wrapping up our coverage. Thank you for being with us, and we have been sponsored here at 25 NTC. By Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. Next week, storytelling with an award-winning crime fiction author. If you missed any part of this week’s show, Swing that mic over here. I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Being like possessive with the mic, just share. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show social media is by Susan Chavez. Marc Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for August 25, 2025: Put The Fun In Fundraising & Adopt New Software

 

Sarah Angello & Dinesh Nadar: Put The Fun In Fundraising

Sarah Angello and Dinesh Nadar want to see you have enjoyment, pure fun(!), in your fundraising. They reveal the psychology behind gamification, and share elements and case studies of successful gamification. This will help you shift the power dynamics between your donors and your nonprofit. Sarah and Dinesh are both from Daffodil. (This is part of our coverage of the 2025 Nonprofit Technology Conference.)

Melissa Dickinson, Evelyn Dickinson, & Nikki Neuen: Adopt New Software

Our panel supports your new software project with advice around leadership; champions; communications; preserving ideas; requirements; migration; smooth launch; post-launch strategies; and more. They’re Melissa Dickinson, Evelyn Dickinson and Nikki Neuen, all from Logical Alternative, Inc. Their titles are Ace, Diva and Maven, respectively. Their resources for you are at https://logalt.net/25ntc/. (This is also from our #25NTC coverage.)

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

 

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host, and I’m the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d come down with giganto mastia. If you inflamed me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, to tell us what’s going on. Hey Tony, it’s our penultimate 2025 nonprofit technology conference show. First, Put the fun in fundraising. Sarah Angelo and Dinesh Nadar want to see you have enjoyment, pure fun, in your fundraising. They reveal the psychology behind gamification and share elements and case studies of successful gamification. This will help you shift the power dynamics between your donors and your nonprofit. Sarah and Dinesh are both from Daffodil. Then Adopt new software. Our panel supports your new software project with step by step advice around leadership, champions, communication, preserving ideas, requirements, migration, smooth launch, post launch strategies, and more. They are Melissa Dickinson, Evelyn Dickinson, and Nicki Nen, all from Logical Alternative Inc. Their titles are Ace, Diva, and Maven respectively. On Tony’s take 2. Ask hard questions. Here is, put the fun in fundraising. Thanks for being with our 25 NTC coverage. We are together at the Baltimore Convention Center, where our coverage is sponsored by Heller Consulting. Our topic now is putting the fun in fundraising, gamification strategies for donor engagement. With me are Sarah Angelo and Dinesh Nadar. They are both co-founders with another person, not with us, of daffodil. Um, Sarah, why don’t you start with, uh, you can explain what the daffodil does. It’s not, it’s a lovely name, but, uh, it’s not descriptive of your work, so tell us what you do. First of all, Tony, thank you so much for having us. We’re really excited to be here at NTC in Baltimore. This is Daffodil’s first NTC and The reason why it’s our first NTC is we are a new company. We were actually founded at the end of last year, so still in our first year. Thank you newlywed. It is our newlywed year. Congratulations Dinesh, so exciting for us to be invited to speak at NTC this year and present on this topic when we’re still kind of a baby startup ourselves. What do you do? Uh, so what Daffodil does is we are a strategic philanthropy platform that connects high impact nonprofits with donors that are looking to make an impact with their philanthropic capital. We work with donor advised fund holders, wealth advisors, uh, philanthropic consultants, foundations, and really the the entire universe and ecosystem of people who help make charitable giving. Uh, and we are that mechanism for directing that gift and providing impact and accountability into the gift itself, and we do that through a tech for solution. That’s right. The platform is called Daffodil yeah like the host of this show, your your platform is aptly named as well. Dinesh, why don’t you get us get us started with the uh. Gamification strategies. What um what what are we talking about? What what well no what is gamification? let’s start with the basic um so the way we think about this is, uh, a lot of nonprofits time and effort is spent in communicating the impact. That they have uh on the communities and um they are doing that while they’re actually doing the work to support those communities. And when we think about gamification, we think about how um this could be made a lot easier for the nonprofits but also made appealing to the donors in terms of how they’re viewing their impact. And so the way we think about this is there’s already so much data out there about nonprofits and their work, they leverage social media. They leverage newsletters, um, there is so much information out there with the IRS and so one way of looking at it is, uh, taking all of the data that we have and putting it through layers where it becomes visually appealing to the donor in terms of how that impact is being shown. And so, uh, we look at this as, you know, when a donor comes in and they look at uh what a nonprofit’s work is they see uh almost like an impact journey of this is what they’ve done. You know, a few months back, and this is how they lit their impact and this is what the impact of their donations are. And so it’s all, yeah, it’s basically bringing the gamification aspect into how impact has been visualized for the donors in some ways the visualizations but yeah if if I were to reduce it to one question. when you ask people why do you give? Why are you motivated to support a cause? why do you contribute your time and resources? The answer that you hear most often is to make an impact. Donors give because they want to because they find it satisfying. They want to be part of something bigger than themselves. And very often nonprofits kind of lose sight of that and how they’re communicating their impact and how they’re engaging with their donors. They focus on maybe minutiae or things that are unique to that organization rather than solving that critical question at the heart of why a donor chooses to give. They give because they want to. It allows them to be part of a community larger than themselves to have an impact. There’s a cognitive resonance and there’s an emotional resonance tapping into that, that’s the gamification. You’re making giving fun again. You’re making giving part of what a donor wants to do. OK, yeah, let’s say a little more about making it more fun and um. And and the psychology behind this gamification. Absolutely so donor motivations are really key to why they give and the psychology, the behavioral psychology of how we think about donations and giving and philanthropy, a lot of it has grown out of consumer psychology and what we know about people’s spending habits in general. But when you restrict it to the philanthropic landscape and there are so many great reports on this, I really like the CCS fundraising report, Giving USA. Uh, the fundraising effectiveness project, these are all people who are doing fantastic work about understanding donor motivations to give and what it often comes down to is there’s this social aspect, there’s this aspect of wanting to be part of something bigger and make that investment. And when you don’t have that uh connection, you don’t have something that’s pushing you to make that gift your your dollars stay dormant there’s so many people that want to give that want to make a difference and they just don’t know how. So how do you see this methodology pushing the the donation? So what we do at Daffodil to solve for that is we make it really seamless for uh for donors to give with nudges with uh monthly sustainers where they opt into making a monthly contribution that goes out to high impact nonprofits we do the matchmaking for them. And then as a result they’re going to get ongoing visibility into impact and accountability metrics so instead of having to chase down that information from 7 different nonprofits that you support on their timeline every month we’re making sure that you’re seeing what your gift really does the outcome of your giving, which is what supplies so much of the joy and satisfaction of making an investment in your community. OK, and Dinesh, you’re you’re saying the the way you’re doing this. Frequent reporting is is visualized gamification, so, so like how, how are we turning the donation in the donation and its impact as you’re saying Sarah into a game visualization, um, I’ll give you uh kind of a hypothetical example of that so. Um, this is something we’re still kind of evolving from a daffodil perspective, but let’s say you are coming into daffodil or any kind of, you know, from, from a gamification perspective, you, you have an idea of what you want to donate. Um, but that’s where it is, right? You’re still figuring it out. And so, uh, imagine if you come into a platform where you go on a product where you go, OK, I would like to donate, um, $10 today, um, and so, uh, and we ask you a series of questions in terms of, um, are there specific cause you mind, are there specific geographies you have in mind? And you can almost kind of use that information that the donor provides to give them a retroactive perspective. If you had donated, let’s say 6 months back hypothetically, this is what your impact would have been. So we’ve kind of gamified the experience to the point where they’re actually seeing their impact if they had actually done it. If you had donated to this specific organization or to these causes, uh, in general, and this is how your money would have gone to these organizations based on our matchmaking in general. So if you, if you think about. Um, Daffodil is a platform trying to match make based on your causes, we can actually leverage that information and create that kind of network and say this is your impact. Does that make sense? But, but even hypothetically this would have been your impact if you had given. To this specific organization. It could be a specific organization. It could be organizations which are part of that cause area in general whatever causes you’re trying to support. So be, be, be, uh, you can restrict to specific organizations that you’re interested in or you can go broader in terms of these are specific geographies or I don’t want myself to restrict to a specific organization, but these are the specific list of cause areas that I’m interested in um for the. Uh, the 99 and 0.9% of listeners who are not, uh, daffodil clients because you’re very new and they haven’t heard of you yet, what can they and and our listeners are in small and mid-size nonprofits which I imagine is your target, uh, target demographic nonprofit. Um, what can they take away from the gamification and strategy? Yeah, well, there are 3 things I’d say to that. I’ll add one for you. uh uh talk to Daffodil might have been too modest to say sign up for daffodil. It’s free for nonprofits to join us. It is free to get in front of donors. We don’t charge nonprofits, so sign up, join up, join our, our mailing list, get daffodil.com. Um, let me tell you some more about other things that you could do to bring gamification processes into your fundraising and into ways that you engage with your supporters and stakeholders. The first thing that you can do, take a look at your messaging and ask yourself what question is this solving? If a donor is looking at my materials and looking at my communication strategies, what am I actually telling them? Is this solving their question of how am I making an impact and how are we making an impact together? So that’s one thing you could do. The second thing you could do, giving is supposed to be fun. If someone is volunteering with you, serving on your board, being part of your mission, they’re not doing it because they have to. They’re doing it because they want to. How are you respecting and leaning into the fact that they’re choosing to give you their money and their time? How are you celebrating that choice and making that an easier choice to make? And the third thing that I would tell you is have fun with your campaigns, have fun with your fundraising and don’t be afraid to inject some personality into it. In our session that we’re leading tomorrow, we’re talking about two case studies, one from a really large nonprofit in Minnesota and one from the mid-size nonprofit in San Francisco. And both had tremendous success with campaigns where they threw away their historic playbook and leaned into something that really resonated with their communities and was unique to their mission. It allowed them to re-engage donors who had walked away. More than 60% of donors give once and never give again. That is a huge opportunity that’s just left on the table. And when you get creative and think out of the box and inject some personality into your brand into your fundraising, that’s a huge opportunity to win them back. I’ve heard uh donor attrition rates even higher than 60 75% plus after the first gift, right, so share the story of the San Francisco mid-size nonprofit, what they did to throw away the playbook, have more fun. So this was a campaign that I ran about 4 years ago. And we knew that we wanted to do more digital fundraising and my pre daffodil days it’s hard to believe when you’re just a seed daffodil was just a seed in fact, a daffodil daffodil is a bulb. It’s a bulb, not a bulb. Alright, so you were, you were, you were in your pre-bulb. Alright, alright. Let’s take any further than we don’t grubs and worms and fertilizer and balancing in the soil that go ahead. So my pre-daffodil days I was a fundraiser. I was a frontline fundraiser at nonprofits of all different sizes. I was working for this organization in San Francisco that had a demographic that a lot of people assume don’t give online, a demographic that’s mostly older, older than 65. And I wanted to try something new, so just to have a little bit of fun, I found a local celebrity who was really well known to our mission area, um, not someone who’s a household name, not someone that has a massive social media following, but someone who if you were into her mission and into her knee, she’d say oh that guy, cool, and we asked him if he’d be willing to make two phone calls. And he said two phone calls like, OK, to people who are interested in what I do, sure. So we ran a campaign just saying give any amount and this niche celebrity is gonna randomly call two supporters and you’re gonna get 15 minutes to talk to him. Uh, this was a campaign that cost me $0 to put together. It just leaned into a relationship we already had with someone who cared about our mission. And the campaign was tremendously successful in re-engaging donors that hadn’t been active in 3 or 4 years. It had our largest open rates, our largest conversion rates, our largest forwarding rates, and it was something that was totally different than anything we’d ever done before. It was ring ring the celebrity is calling you wanna talk to him. And that unusual approach of what you get for donating um really resonated with people and two years later, many of those new donors who came in as a result of that campaign were still supporting. OK, so you helped to defeat your what uh what would have been a higher donor attrition rate after the after the first year 2 years later, many were still with you what you normally would expect to be like a 75% attrition rate was I think about 40%. Yeah, very good half um, your session description talks about, uh, shifting power dynamics between between donors and nonprofits. Dinesh, how, how are you doing that? Yeah, um, so the, the way we think about this is, uh, in terms of what a power dynamic is, um, so the funds obviously are sitting with the donors in general and um the, the way we think about this, there’s this aspect of nonprofits, um, having to solicit those funds in terms of, you know, from their perspective, like what is, what does this look like? And so shifting the part. in our view is basically creating a balance where um the information flow is more seamless in terms of how nonprofits are communicating their impact um is resonating with the doors in a way where it doesn’t feel like I’m being asked for something and that is why I’m providing this information as opposed to the proactive aspect of this is what we’re doing and donors. Actually appreciating that. So, so that’s where kind of, you know, the power dynamics of not being asked or tools to do something as opposed to being this is our impact and we’re communicating this and this, this is, uh, you know, the impact for work and uh so that that is an essential like the information flow kind of rebalancing the dynamics in some way we’re contributing here too we’re creating, yeah, we’re contributing work. Toward the solution to the problem that we’re all we’re all committed to the proactive aspect is what I would call out in terms of not being asked for it. So I think that contributes to the kind of the dynamics in some ways as well. And Tony, nonprofits waste so much time doing custom reporting this and bespoke communication for all different funders and supporters. What we’re doing at Daffodil is we’re reclaiming their time from that, uh, very custom, very unscalable action. Instead of being a development person who’s leading communication and talking to a portfolio of 100 different donors with 100 different ways that those donors like to hear from you, we are building something where your one approach to impact and communication and outcomes is what’s going out to your portfolio of 100 donors. Instead of having to focus 1 to 1, we’re one to many. So you no longer need to spend your time with these custom impact reportings and different ways of communicating to different donors because we believe that we’ve found the best way to communicate your impact to donors and we’re doing that for you. That’s contrary to a lot of advice which is segment. Be, be, be specific in not only in asking but also in reporting specific to what the person is that that cohort is is is interested in. Absolutely and when a donor joins daffodil we know what they’re interested in so we can do this for the nonprofit instead of having to customize their communication to each specific donor we take their impact information through our platform and we’re giving that impact and accountability data to our network of donors. OK, OK, um, we have a few minutes left. If there’s something we haven’t talked about yet, you’re as you plan, you said your session is session, but um what else is absolutely our session is just one step of what’s kind of next for a pretty busy 3 months for daffodil. Uh, we are a young company as we mentioned, and we are. Um, just wrapping up a pilot phase of our product, but in June we are launching our product to the Denver area. That’s where I’m from, uh, so any nonprofit in Denver, any supporter and donor in Denver, they can be part of what we’re building. We’re going to be hosting a launch event. You can stay tuned and follow Daffodil more for what’s going on in June, um, and then beyond that we’re going to be going live in different localities throughout the country. Through the remainder of the remainder of the year, that’s right, we’re going to be targeting Miami, where our third co-founder is based in New York where Dinesh lives, and other parts of the country where there are a large nonprofit presence. OK, Dinesh, where do you live in the city? Uh, Manhattan. What part of Manhattan? Midtown town in the 30s or so, isn’t it? Yeah, yeah, OK. Yeah, been there 20 years almost. Uh, like Madison Ave, Madison Madison 20, OK, right, I lived, uh, uptown in for, uh, 10 years. Now I live on a beach in North Carolina. OK. I did live 10 years in Manhattan. Um, all right, well, uh, good wishes for Daffodil. Thank you. Thank you Tony. Thank you for sharing about gamification, um. Yeah, and uh, so would you give a shout out Dinesh do it this time, how can people followffodil? Yeah, so just go there, um. It’s absolutely a bulb, um, and, uh, yeah, uh, that’s the easiest way to get to us, um, we’re on Instagram, uh, other social media as well. Look up Get Daffodil. You’ll find us there as well, and then, yeah, hit us follow, um, and then we’ll we’ll go from there. All right, thank you very much. Sarah. No, that’s correct. That’s incorrect. Sarah Angelo Sarah Angelo, co-founder of Daffodil, along with her, uh, to, uh, the other of, uh, how would I say, along with the second of three, that’s how I would say it along with her second of three, co-founders, uh, Dinesh and Nadar, and thank you for being with Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 25 NTC where we are sponsored by Heller Consulting. Software services for nonprofits. It’s time for Tony’s take two. Thank you, Kate. Asking hard questions, I just spent 2 days. On site with a client, uh, and uh it was uh facilitated by uh another consultant. Uh, the subject of the two days of meetings was their, their digital marketing. And we asked a lot of hard questions. Like, you know, what should the organization’s primary messaging be? What are, what are our most, you know, most Mission, brand, and value aligned messages. Um, is our own messaging aligned, consistent, you know, across, uh, all our channels, print and digital, and all the platforms that we, that we use, uh, they’re, they’re predominant on uh Facebook and Instagram and Twitch. Uh, so, you know, so is messaging consistent and You know, what, what, what can we do better? What, what channels and platforms can we exploit more, uh, what should we be cutting back on, or maybe, maybe even ending. Um, do we have all the skills that we need in, in the team? Are there people on the team that need support or investment, professional development? Um, so, you know, it’s just, it was just a very, very valuable two-day exercise. Everybody felt very good about it at the end. Uh, it’s an exhausting exercise. Again, it was facilitated by someone who facilitates meetings and, and also knows digital marketing. That is not at all, neither one of those is MySpace. I’m, I mean I was there talking about planned giving and a little broader, but I was not leading the facilitation. You need, you need a pro to. To do this, to coalesce all the opinions and. Find the through lines, right, and just help manage the conversation flow cause there were probably 1010, 11 people around the table, so. Uh, you need, you need a pro helping you to do this, but just the overall thing is just, you know, it, it was valuable. It was, uh, it was reflective. People were genuine about what their needs are and about what they think they could do with a little more, you know, support or investment and Uh, what they feel they’re not, they or we are not doing well, you know. Um, you just A, uh, a reflective and informative exercise overall, uh, over, over two days. So I encourage you to have these occasionally, whatever subject it may be for you. For us, I said, as I said, it was digital marketing, but you may be aligned and or have concerns about something totally different. It’s just, it’s just valuable to take time away. Everybody puts their phone down, closes their laptops and participates in a. In an exercise devoted, you know, everybody’s attention. Focused on whatever the subject is that uh you want to cover. So asking hard questions, it’s uh it’s, it’s valuable, it’s insightful. And that’s Tony’s stick too. Kate, Sounds like you learned a lot and had fun. Uh, we did learn a lot. Yeah, there’s, there’s a lot to do in follow-up though too. You get all important follow-up, you know, things have to actually be implemented that you talk about. And yeah, it was, it was fun, uh, exhausting, but, but fun, yeah. And you said this was in New York? That was in New York City. Yes, I was in New York City for 2 days. Yeah. Yeah, you probably know my next question. Did you go to Broosh bagel? Well, actually, all right, I misspoke. I was not in New York City. I just said I was, I just said I was in New York City. I was not in New York City. I was on Long Island. I was, I was on Long Island. So no, no nosh at noro nosh at 85th and Broadway, not this time, no. Good. Anybody, uh, traveling to or living in New York City. Broad notch bagels. Uh, Kate knows it because her school was there, ADA, where she trained for two years, and I know it because she brought me to it. Yes, for after my graduation. Well Tony, I have to show you this bagel place, my favorite bagel place. Now I want people to know that that was not the Graduation celebration meal was not a broad notch. We went to a very nice restaurant to celebrate your graduating bagel, bagel shop. The only thing my uncle got me was bagels, bagel. Hey, but the bagel had salmon on it. It was, you got fresh sliced salmon. That was an upgrade. That, that was a meaningful bagel, graduation bagel. Yes, no, we did, we did it before. I do remember. Yes. Um, oh, we’ve got boooo but loads more time. Here is adopt new software. Hello and welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference. We’re all together in Baltimore, Maryland at the convention center, and our 25 NTC coverage is sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. The session we’re talking about right now is adopt new software, get buy-in, training and integration. My guests are Melissa Dickinson, Evelyn Dickinson, and Nikki Nen. Melissa is communications Ace at Logical Alternative Inc. Evelyn is founder and technical tech diva at Logical Alternative Inc and probably not too surprising. Uh, Nicky is also at Logical Alternative Inc. Uh, Nicky is client success Maven. Welcome, welcome everybody. Melissa, Evelyn, Nicky, welcome. Thank you so much. Thanks. We have an ace, a diva and a Maven. This should be very right, keep it light. Let’s not, let’s not, yeah, that’s, I love it. Let’s not take ourselves too seriously. Yes, thank you. Good, good. OK. Uh, I like I’m the boring one, host. Any schmo could be a host, but it takes talent to be an Ace diva or maven. All right, uh, adopting new software. So Melissa, let’s just start with you. Could you just give us an overview of the, the subject matter that you covered in your session about adopting new software? What high level view? Sure, um, so we’ve been doing this exact thing for about 35 years, um, so when we decided to come to N10 for the first time. Um, well that was a topic that was on the list and I said, well, if we’re gonna talk about a topic we should talk about that one, and so it’s a lot of material, you know, there’s many layers to that process, um, so we just kind of started from the beginning, the planning stages, um, how do you get buy in from your leadership team, how do you make sure that everybody is taken, you know, taking along for the ride you find your champions, um, and so we talked a lot about that in the session. How to make sure that your team is always communicating and in a safe space and you’re making sure to record ideas and possible risks and pitfalls and all that so we talked a lot about that then we got into the technical side of it which was your requirements gathering, how do you decide whether you can do it all in house or whether you need a consultant’s help, um, we got into what are the data migration sort of strategies and pitfalls, things that can come up along the way. Um, and then what do you do for launch to make sure your go live is smooth and finally what do you do post launch. So it’s just, you know, basically from A to Z, how do you get this done with the minimum amount of pain and the highest likelihood of success. OK. Uh, let’s let’s at least get through the, yeah, I was gonna say let’s at least get through the, the, the non-technical part up to and uh stopping short of requirements. But we, we might go further. There’s no reason not to go further. I’m not saying cut it off, but let’s at least get through the. The non-technical section. So, leadership, our leadership buy-in may just continue down the line, uh, logical progression. Uh, Evelyn, can you get us started with uh how we get leadership buy-in? Yeah, um, it’s, uh, sticky wicked. uh, you have to first make sure that your leadership really believes in the product uh absolutely believes in the cause, what’s happening, why you’re doing this, and, um, you have to get them to publicly acknowledge that to the entire team, um, you know, a lot of times and, and it actually came up in our presentation where folks, um, I think they. Especially your leadership, they want to hedge their bets sometimes they’ll be like we need this done, um, and if you get it done great and if you don’t then you know you fall on your sword it happens um I think you know we’re as leaders we’re all so pressed we’re so busy. And um so one of the things we talk about is making sure that you have a healthy organization before you get started you have a healthy um acknowledgement from your leadership team that this is an important thing and that the whole organization is going to be committed to it um so you’re not constant. um struggling internally, uh, with folks who who who maybe um don’t wanna commit the resources like at the management at the like, you know, uh, department levels, uh, because it does require, especially with larger implementations that affect the whole organization, um, it just requires everyone’s commitment so you gotta start there make sure that the leadership is committed it’s OK um. That, that could be let’s uh drill down a little further in terms of getting that leadership by so you’ve made it clear that leadership has to be committed, you know, publicly, but to get that leadership by to get that commitment, uh. I’ve had previous NTC panels other years say, you know, it’s valuable to have allies. Like if, if you feel a business need, it’s valuable to have an ally or two to help you make the case. Can we, can you talk some about getting the leadership to the point of commitment? Yeah, you know, it’s interesting that actually came up at our panel as well. Um there was there was one there who was um facing very similar issues and um she asked us after the presentation about that very thing. Um, she had a boss who was not, um, willing to get committed, and they were looking for solutions and, um, a lot of times you can go laterally within the organization so I should say I used to be the CIO of a multi-billion dollar company, um, so I have a perspective of being that person. Um, and so, you know, you just need to find um the believer, right at the, at the leadership level, um, someone. Is going to uh recognize the value of what you’re trying to accomplish and if they don’t then you know you shouldn’t start. I, you know that it’s hard to say that sometimes, but if you, if you can’t get there, you shouldn’t start, yeah, because you’re gonna fail and you’re not gonna get the commitment and then it’s gonna be twice as hard the next time, right? So you just have to, you know, you have to just reach out within the. find out where the, I hate to use these bus, the value proposition is, right? This is gonna save so much time or this is gonna save so much money and then you just have to find the person that that really has the bandwidth to care because we’re also pressed. And the, you know, you know, retrench and ally 6 months from now, you know, it may take some take some time across the organization’s Nicky. It looked like you were gonna add something, yeah, yeah, I just wanna add in there that in the process of figuring out what your solution is or what the change needs to be what we talked about in our presentation was interviews with people who who will be doing the process. So who will be using the software interviews with leadership and so various levels within the team and uh often within those interviews you find your champions and and you’re able to find and use those in your use case why why do we even need to make the change? Why are we going into the situation to begin with and then along with that. Um, logical alternative has all, you know, templates for gathering requirements and things like that. So in the process of doing the research within the organization of what’s needed, very often you can find the evidence that’s required to convince leadership the but the that particular challenge of finding the person to just say yes and stand behind it. Um, it sometimes it goes a little bit further and like Evi was saying that requires going lateral or. Using numbers sometimes it’s using numbers. Melissa, you, you, you actually raised your hand. I was gonna say exactly what Nikki just said Nikki covered it. The only other thing we talked about, yeah, bring the data, right, bring the data. So if you can come to leadership and say we did interviews with the whole team and 72% of them said that this is a pain point and it needs to be solved for them to do their job well. That’s hard to argue with, so that was the one thing. You know, just like Nikki said, and the other thing is sometimes we also had somebody in our panel who said everyone in the organization is too busy, does not have time to do this work, to do these interviews, and I said that’s the point at which you think about do we need a consultant to do these interviews. So yeah, and then we just kind of jumped out of step but you you’ve got to get the leadership in before you can take the time to meet with the. Has to to take the time to interview but once you do once you get down to the uh folks we call process owners or the people who are literally doing the work that you’re trying to improve upon that’s where the golden opportunity is uh you do the discovery you get findings you roll all those up and then you can make a presentation to the board that really usually drives. Evelyn, what did you call them process flows, the, the, the, you know, the folks who actually we used to call them. I don’t know is that an outdated I I got a degree in information systems in 1984. I’m actually trying to be more um when you have. Who’s a process owner they’re responsible for that or they’re the subject matter expert on a particular work flow. OK, yeah, maybe, maybe not the end user right they may be they may be the person who’s responsible for the outcomes of that or the devisor of it of Florida. OK. Uh, Nicky, so you brought up champions, uh, a couple of times. We’re not at the champ, so now we’ve got our, uh, public. Explicit commitment by uh by leadership, no question. Now the champions, that’s the next step, are the champions are the champions are the champ I’m not gonna do that to you all. But nor should I have nor should I have, um, ideally you’re gonna have champions within your, your user groups if you will and in leadership and on your implementation team and your champions are gonna be the people who are sort of your early adopters. They’re the people who are gonna help buffer the flow of complaints and grouchiness that is absolutely coming your way. Um, and, uh, and then they help. Keep the the optimism of this change going right? so they’re the people who are saying, hey, you know that thing that you used to hate? I think I, I just found the solution in here right? um, it’s also the person whoever is doing the roll out is also going to complain. You are also going to complain even if you’re leading this change. Uh, it’s best that you not complain to the people who are already grouchy, right? So your champions are your insiders. And um in leadership you’ve got a champion there maybe buffers. I’m not trying to change your language, but like they’re they’re buffers between the the you yourself and leading the leading the thing, leading the project, uh, are gonna be complaining. So they’re they’re buffers, maybe they’re therapists too. I don’t know, but they’re certainly protecting from the from the groundswell of, of discontent. You’ve created with this project, right? Evelyn, oh well, I was just gonna say that, yeah, not necessarily. Well, I mean, I, I tend to, I didn’t know, no you are not overstating that. I’m a very positive person and I also have a deep belief in humanity, um, so I’m a, I, I’m a martial artist, so I use a lot of kung fu, um, terminology and um. And, and that’s not uncommon in in uh business process change, um, so what happens is, is as you’re doing, uh, the interviews so you, you identify all your work flow processes that we’re gonna renovate you find the folks who are doing them and who have deep knowledge of those processes you document what we call the ASIS, then you identify and interview all of the folks involved as many as possible. And you mine that for information and in the process of talking to those folks um you find folks who are just really positive about this change they’re excited yeah yeah they’re really excited about it but the other cool thing is, is, is we’re talking about Grouch. is that you know uh everybody doesn’t approach everything from a positive perspective and that is super valuable so what you do is um when people are being negative you don’t take it personally you value that input and you um work with those folks and uh I like to call them risk managers, right? You value them you value their input, you sit down with them and say. What is what can go wrong, you know what is, please share your valuable perspective. Let’s make notes of that and what you do is you turn these people into champions you turn them into folks and say like, hey, we have got, we’ve gotta fix these problems. We, we need to address these concerns and let’s not that like Nikki mentioned this problem that you have, we can solve that we’re gonna. To take care of that. I mean, that’ll help convert this bottleneck that I’ve experienced for years is not gonna be resolved and and maybe that’s cynicism, maybe that’s fear of change, maybe they’re just not really great at, you know, technology, maybe, you know, their toaster broke that morning. Maybe they’re worried about losing their job or losing their relevance in the organization. So asking why they’re resisting what’s what’s, you may hear a lot of symptoms, but what’s what’s the real discontent. Evelyn, you mentioned something that I think maybe. Oh, yeah, so when you’re when you’re trying to read, thank you for translating, yeah, she speaks Evelyn, yeah, um, so yeah, your current work let’s just take a very simple example like you’re say you’re trying to rebuild your donor management work flow, right? So I like how she says that’s simple. We’re gonna take a simple example. Sorry, yeah, so you know you get a donation on the website, uh, it goes to, you know, it notifies you look and see how much money this person’s donated, whatever that process is, how you’re doing what you’re doing today and you make. A little flow chart or sketch it on the back of a napkin or whatever you need to do, figure out what departments are involved, what individuals are involved. So that’s the way we do it today. That’s the way our current systems flow exactly OK I was just trying to flesh it out for listeners, OK. Uh, I, I thought I heard it as Oz. I was like thinking of the Emerald City. I probably slurred it, but that’s kind of fun too. Well, we’re approaching, right? We, we’re approaching the Emerald City with our new software implementation. So the the the wizard is gonna grant this wizard is gonna grant us all our wishes and dissolve all our bottlenecks and and and your little dog too. That’s the wicked wish. No, we don’t bring her in, um. All right, Melissa, let’s turn to you because we haven’t heard from you recently. Uh, communications, uh, communications and safety, you, you mentioned in in the overview. What what’s the thinking of the, uh, of a logical alternative. So my role in these types of rollouts is a lot of training. I do a lot of the training videos, training repositories, um, sort of on the on the end where we’ve got the new thing in place and now we wanna make sure that everybody knows how to use it, that it’s sustainable. So if somebody leaves the organization, there’s this repository of training materials. So, um, yeah, that’s that’s that’s what, that’s the kind of communication that I’m doing in these sorts of rolls. OK. Yeah, um, so, well, safety, oh yeah, well, OK, that’s in the in in the interview process and in the during the process of the roll out. I’m sorry, I’m confusing it. OK, let’s just talk about the communication, no no I’m sorry. What’s your advice? Well, I think I just what I kind of started to say which is that which is that um. I would say, you know, keep in mind that the people who are here now may not be the people that are doing this job in the future or you may want to bring people along over a period of time so you you kinda wanna group your training groups, you know, so that you’re not trying to train people in different departments all at the same time you wanna take maybe a different approach or a different focus for each group so there’s a structure to the training planning and that’s part of our tool kit that we shared during the session. Um, and then once you have that structure, you sort of schedule your different groups, you have your group leaders, um, and then you have your tasks list that they’ve already given you in the process of the planning, right? You know all the tasks that everybody in that team has to do. So then you create videos for these usually in my case it’s a short video, maybe 20-30 seconds even just for one task at a time. And then we have a repository that we build that is accessible to everybody in the organization that can be added to at any time. So anytime we take a support request that wasn’t already covered, I make a video and I put it in the repository, and then we make sure that on the admin side of whatever system they’re using there is a dashboard that has access to all those videos with a table of contents. So if for some reason everybody in the org was gone next year, you still have that sustainable. OK, that is something that is on that? Yes, we’ll. Yeah, we, we provided a lot of tools in that session because we covered a lot of material. So yeah, absolutely. I also wanted to say, um, could you speak a little bit about um how folks learn differently so we create different tools for them. Yeah absolutely well I you know with with some of the tools that we have now to record video, it’s very helpful because they transcribe so if you’re more of a word learner rather than a video learner you know we kind of get that built in um we also have different types of learning sessions which can be hands on or um you know. I guess we just kind of find out who’s who are we training we often talk to the leader of that team and say, you know, is there a approach that would work better for your team? Now let’s now safety, uh, I was, I was taking notes as you were doing the overview. Where does safety fit in? Well that’s more talking about um the things that Nikki and Abby were talking about which is the um process of gathering all that information the as is right the and the planning, the requirements for your roll out so when you’re involving the team in these conversations you want it to be. Be egalitarian, you want it to be democratic as much as possible. You wanna make sure that you’re approaching it from a fun upbeat this is gonna be good attitude and you wanna make sure they know they’re in a safe space, especially when they’re being interviewed one on one, but also in a group setting that. If you have reservations, if you have questions, it’s safe to ask that because you wanna capture as much information as possible during that planning process during the requirements gathering process uh the more information you get, the better your chances of success and that is created by making sure that everybody’s voices are valued and everybody knows that they can share their thoughts and ideas. And Nikki, um, it, it’s important to record all these ideas that Melissa’s talking about. Yeah, can you expand on that for us? Uh preservation of all these thoughts and ideas. Yeah, for the most part Logical alternative has used uh audio recordings so that uh so that when one is conducting the interviews you you can be as present as possible and ask, ask questions and investigate whatever is coming up, um. It’s wonderful if you can have two interviewers in that space so that one person can take written notes, but um but yeah all of that information is gathered and then is used to inform next steps. That also comes uh brings up another safety point that Abby mentioned in the presentation which is when you when we’re recording the interviews we make sure to tell the person we’re interviewing. This is not gonna be shared with management whole cloth. It’s for our purposes we’re gonna take the relevant information, put it in the report in the repository, and, and anonymize it. Did I say that right? You did, yeah, it’s not an easy word, uh, yeah, that’s super important. Well, reality is often barriers to uh process efficiency have to do with individuals, so you know you you’re not, you’re not after that person’s job, but you, you wanna make sure that um we identify where the barriers in the process are so we can fix them. It’s not, it’s not personal, you know, Nicky, it sounds like you want to add something and and then we’ll, we’re gonna close. Related to that just it was brought up earlier that if someone’s afraid that they’re gonna lose their job or that they will become obsolete then then creating that space for them where they feel hurt and. If it’s possible to figure out that someone might be experiencing that kind of fear, uh find a way to offset it. Because they’re not gonna be completely honest if they’re if the fear is that they won’t be there after this roll out or that their whole existence, you know, the thing they spend 2 hours 3 hours a day doing will no longer exist. The likelihood that they’re not gonna share everything is pretty high. It’s all right thank you. They’re, uh, they’re the Ace, uh, the diva and the Maven, uh, all with logical alternative inc. Melissa Dickinson’s communications Ace, Evelyn Dickinson, founder and tech Diva, and Nicky Nan, the client success Maven, all stuck with, uh, just middling like host any. you need to work on that. I need to work on my self-esteem. I’m in the face of an ace of diva and a maven. I got no chance. It’s unbelievable. All right, thank you very much. Thank you for sharing good wishes to the company. Uh, and thank all of you for, uh, being a part of our 25 NTC coverage where we’re sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. Thanks for being with us. Next week, our 25 NTC coverage wraps up with your emergency marketing plan and your more diverse board. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com, and next week we’re gonna be together. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for August 18, 2025: Inclusive & Engaging Virtual Meetings & RFP: Request For Partnership

 

Tiffany Ferguson & Akailah Jenkins McIntyre: Inclusive & Engaging Virtual Meetings

Our panel reveals how you can host accessible virtual meetings that foster active participation by removing barriers for diverse audiences, so all voices are heard and valued. They’re Tiffany Ferguson and Akailah Jenkins McIntyre, both from DevelopWell. (This is part of our coverage of the 2025 Nonprofit Technology Conference.)

Kylie Aldridge Ogden & Ashley Stagg: RFP: Request For Partnership

Kylie Aldridge Ogden and Ashley Stagg help you reimagine the RFP as a request for partnership. They share advice on what a good RFP looks like; how to involve your teams and get buy-in; how to keep the work on budget and on time; and, more. Kylie and Ashley are with ImageX Media. (This is also from our #25NTC coverage.)

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

 

 

 

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d get slapped with a diagnosis of cladospoosis if you infected me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer Kate with what’s up this week. Hey, Tony. Our coverage of the 2025 nonprofit technology conference continues with Inclusive and engaging virtual meetings. Our panel reveals how you can host accessible virtual meetings that foster active participation by removing barriers for diverse audiences, so all voices are heard and valued. They are Tiffany Ferguson and Aayla Jenkins McIntyre, both from Develop Well. Then RFP request for partnership. Kylie Aldridge Ogden and Ashley Stagg help you reimagine the RFP as a request for partnership. They share advice on what a good RFP looks like, how to involve your teams and get buy in, how to keep the work on budget and on time, and more. Kylie and Ashley are with Image X Media. On Tony’s take too. Hails from the gym. The know it all. Here is inclusive and engaging virtual meetings. Hello and welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit Radio coverage of 25 NTC, the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference. We’re kicking off our day two coverage. We’re sponsored here at 25 NTC by Heller Consulting Technology services for nonprofits. The topic right now is facilitating inclusive and engaging virtual meetings. My guests are Tiffany Ferguson and Ayla Jenkins McIntyre. Tiffany is principal consultant at Develop Well. Welcome, Tiffany. Thank you pleasure to have you. It’s OK, relax. And uh Akayla Jenkins McIntyre is managing director and principal consultant at Develop Well. Welcome, Michaelayla. Thanks, pleasure to have both of you. Um, all right, so inclusive, inclusive and engaging virtual meetings. What, uh, first of all, what’s our, what, what are we what are we doing wrong? Uh, OK Kayla, why don’t you just give us an overview of the topic? We got plenty of time together, but just give us a high level view you want me to start with what we’re doing wrong? No, start with the high level. a little overview of your session. Did you do your session yet? No, we haven’t. OK. Well, what it’ll be about overview first. Yeah, we are excited to be here and to talk with folks about this. This is one of the things that we really enjoy chatting about, um, and so in terms of what it means to have. a meeting that is inclusive, um, first it’s important that we start with the working assumption that people who are facilitating meetings have a certain amount of power, um, and sometimes that power isn’t addressed. People tend to uh have a. Certain amount of trepidation to address that they’re holding power, but if it’s not addressed, then we don’t know what to do with it um and so that tends to be our, our kind of baseline that when you are in charge of being a facilitator that it comes with a certain amount of responsibility. Um, it’s also important that folks recognize that because power comes with responsibility, the key of that is sharing that power, and that shows up in a number of ways to us. And why don’t we hold, can we just that that’s a good overvie. Yeah, OK, we’ll we’ll get up, we’ll get into how the powers. OK, I just wanted to overview for folks, and for me too because you’ve been thinking about this topic for months or years, and I’ve been looking at it since just a couple of weeks. So thank you, um. OK, um, Tiffany, what, uh, do you want to get us started with how some of this power, well, what are we, I’d like to identify to what, what are we getting wrong about meetings like what, what isn’t inclusive about virtual meetings that we need to address? Yeah, I think there’s several things I think thinking about the context of a virtual meeting is important because what happens during a virtual work day or remote work day is you’re booked back to back you’re running from meetings into new meetings you’re usually probably pulling together agendas at the very last moment um you may not be sort of very intentional about how you’re using people’s time, um, folks also. Sort of treat meetings as if they’re these things they just have to do and showing up is enough and I think what we think about in terms of inclusivity and engagement is talking of thinking about what Akayla said you have a responsibility to prepare to plan to be thoughtful to think about what you’re trying to accomplish and whether or not your facilitation strategy or your agenda items are setting you up to accomplish that. And a lot of times what you need to accomplish is probably information gathering or decision making or prioritizing and there are different tactics to use to kind of approach doing those things that may not always be aligned with how you design your agenda so a lot of what we’re talking about is preparation. Uh, the, the role and power of being a facilitator, sort of being the person who’s watching and observing what’s going on in the meeting, who’s talking, who’s not talking, um, where the conversation is going and whether it’s going off track or not or, or staying on track, um, and then making sure you’re thinking about where where you need to go in the meeting and so sometimes you may have a rich discussion but you’re not getting to the decision. And so sort of the role of the facilitator is really important in the way we think about inclusivity and engagement because you’re the person who’s sort of what we like to say holding the container for this space that people are showing up in to do something together that’s usually probably a little bit hard um and that requires people to kinda make space take space or be aware of the dynamics in in the room. That’s that’s an interesting metaphor holding the container. Say, say a little more about, about that. What what what do you mean by that? Yeah, I would say imagine uh let’s use like a standard kitchen container Tupperware. Um, there are things that are built to take cold liquids, things that are built to sustain hot liquids. There are things that are glass. There are things that are plastic like being very rudimentary here on purpose, um, because a meeting is essentially a, a, it is a it is a holder. It is a place where people are meant to do something inside of it, um, and you’ve gotta have the right sort of structure, you’ve gotta have the right materials you’ve gotta have the right construction. In order to accomplish whatever you’re trying to do inside of it. Thank you. OK, so let, let’s come back to thanks for the overview. let’s come back to some more detail about what you were saying about uh how powers it we we’re in a meeting right now. I’m the facilitator, right? So I have the power that you’re, I, I presume, right? I have the power that. You’re asking me to acknowledge that I’m the host and I have some things I definitely can see I’ve got some bullets that I like to cover. They’re they’re not, they came from your session description, so I’m not imposing anything on you. I don’t, I don’t, but, um, so let’s go through an exercise where I am facilitating, I’m hosting. How is my power showing up? Or if you don’t wanna make it about this, no, that’s fine the abstract too. No, I’m happy. So because this is, you know, your podcast, this is sort of happening on your terms. We’ve shown up here and you do sort of get to, uh, dictate how this goes, um, and so if I’m gonna put that in meeting terms um dictator. We would hope that yeah, yeah, but it, um, even things as simple as um setting the tone for what we would expect of sharing the space with you and so during a virtual meeting as an example that would be something like uh setting agreements or norms among the group so that we are all clear about how we are expected to engage in this space. There has to be someone whose responsibility it is to tell people that. Because otherwise, um people come at things from varying backgrounds um they approach engagement with one another in various ways and so even things um as simple as an agreement to step up and step back um helps people to understand that the expectation is that we are sharing our perspectives in this space that’s stepping up and we are also making space for other people. to have their perspectives shared and that’s stepping back there are meetings where it is the norm for folks to talk over each other. It is the norm for um people to kind of like drill in until they’ve gotten their point across, right? And unless someone is the person who’s saying in this space, the expectation is that we blank, then it can default to whoever the person is who decides that they would like the meeting to go on a. Particular way and so when we say that um power is certainly something that a meeting facilitator holds that is also the power to indicate for folks what the expectation is of a shared and inclusive space that allows all voices to be present and often what is required is for that to be stated and then for there to be someone who is responsible for holding the group accountable to that um as an example a question here about. Uh, some logistics details, um, you, you’ve said a couple of times there’s someone who’s responsible for upholding the group the norms that have been explicitly stated, is that necessarily the group, the the person who’s leading the meeting, or is that could be another role like a moderator? It could absolutely be another role, um, and again when we talk about what it means to share a space, we actually do think that it’s. A good idea for people to hold roles in general because what we desire is for people to be invested in the meeting that they are attending and so we’re clear about your role here we’re clear about our roles here we are here to share about the topic that we know about and are presenting about and you are here to ask us questions about how to how to do this this is a very straightforward sort of set up in this way, but that’s not always the case with meetings. People aren’t always clear about how they are expected to engage assigning people roles, note takers. Someone who’s gonna serve as the moderator, someone who’s gonna serve as the as the timekeeper, someone who’s gonna serve as the person who holds us accountable to our agreements and to name when it feels like perhaps the space is not adhering to those agreements are all responsibilities that we can assign to people that make people feel more invested in the space that they are attending. We don’t want people to be kind of backseat participants in a meeting, we want them to feel as though they are able to actively engage in the meeting. And we feel is the responsibility of the person who’s in charge of facilitating to make sure people see themselves actively reflected in the space that they are engaging in. OK, like I would call it delegation, but, uh, having roles, giving people agency authority in the meeting, um, Tiffany, do we, do we talk about these, um these norms in, in every meeting or I get. I guess it is every meeting when the audience when the group is different then you have to acknowledge these suppose you have a standing weekly meeting and it’s the same 4 people every Tuesday at 2 o’clock in the afternoon. Do you, do you, uh, make these norms explicit each each weekly meeting or is it just kind of assume it’s gonna carry on from you know from week to week. Yeah, I think in that case you would kind of presume that folks are bought into the norms and the way you do that is typically facilitate a conversation periodically um where you set the group norms right? so these yeah it it’s like yeah like whenever we facilitate a session we always start with group norms, but when we have our team meetings, right, we don’t go through the group norms every single time. Um, but you can sort of set a cadence for reviewing them, making sure those are still the norms, making sure people feel. Um, like if they wanna add some or if they wanna talk about, you know, I, I, I feel like we haven’t been living into these, and I think there’s a case to be made for a sort of periodic check in on your group norms as an organization when you’re the same group of people kind of meeting on a regular basis. OK, OK, did you have something to add um. Something that we often hear from people when we’re doing trainings about this kind of thing is that um that’s particularly relevant to agreements is that they will say that and they’re usually talking about a particular person who somehow. Consistently steering meetings away from something exactly, exactly that, um, and they’re trying to say what do I do? It’s a guy. Well, well, I mean you said it not me. I did. It’s a basic assumption, not 100%, but so but this is very common that folks are coming and we’re like giving these strategies and they’re like, OK, yeah, great, all that sounds good, but what about this particular person who is always doing this thing? And the reason that agreements are important is because people don’t know how to address that because um. The sort of, uh, what’s being named implicitly is that they don’t desire there to be a confrontation. Like they don’t desire to confront this person about their actions and how their actions are impacting the group and what group agreements do is that they take that pressure off and instead it becomes about we have agreed that this space, um, the expectations in this space are blank blank and blank and so it is not now, you know, Joe was saying to Bob, hey, you’re doing this thing and you need to stop because you’re blah blah blah. It is a person whose responsibility in this shared. Space is to hold us accountable to the agreement, the title is we all agree and you’re not doing that adhering to what we all agree, yes, and so it becomes much more, much less of a personal Tiffany, you wanna speak to that? It depends on the meeting. I think these are important. Yeah, it is gonna be new to folks. It, it can depend on the meeting, um, and it depends on who’s watching. I think there are a lot of like when we talk about inclusive meetings. Uh, what we’re talking about with inclusivity engagement, people who are sort of actively part of the meeting, not people who are hanging back off screen in their kitchen making coffee or doing whatever people do when they’re in virtual meetings. I’m talking about meetings where people are leaning forward. People need to be watching and when you have that kind of engagement, people can see when there’s a person taking up a lot of space. People can feel when there’s a person who hasn’t said anything in a meeting. People can feel when there’s someone who. Can’t quite uh wrap their head around a thing and and and they’re stuck and and that’s the agreement we typically refer to as uh. Except non closure, right? Like sometimes you’re just not gonna get every answer every question answered, so you’ve gotta be able to sit with that and so when you start to see that stuff having group agreements allows you to know that everybody sees it and once everyone sees it, it’s a lot easier if there’s someone appointed or someone who feels. They have uh someone who feels safe to say, hey, I just want a name that it feels like we’ve been hearing a lot from some folks or hey Tony, I really appreciate your contributions, but you have been talking a lot. I wanna make some space for others and then there are some folks who maybe don’t need to call them out by name. Say hey there are a couple folks here we really like to hear your perspective. Maybe the operations team we haven’t heard from you all. We know you’re working on a big project. What are your thoughts? Do is anything coming up for you? And so a lot of the typically because we tend to facilitate meetings we take on that role, but when you’re working in a team where sort of you want to distribute or share responsibility or agency or or power, you want to make sure it’s safe enough for other people to be able to say, hey, we had this agreement and. We, it, it feels like we’re a little off track, yeah, yeah, and I, I, I completely agree that. Everybody senses what’s happening. Everybody feels it, and it, it, I don’t know now I’ll personalize it to me it’s like it builds up attention and I think the person who’s got the authority, whoever that named person is, has a responsibility to ease the tension for anybody because we all feel it. It’s now it’s an elephant in the room, the virtual room, and it’s if it goes unaddressed then that everybody just just leave the meeting tense and and it’s trying to get to your forget about. Like trying to get to your goals for the meeting, everybody’s got this tension that that can be relieved with a couple of firm reminders and and you know what’s happening while no one’s talking about in the meeting, they’re all back chatting, they’re they’re talking about it’s like, oh my God, there they, there she goes again. Oh my God, they don’t shut up. Oh that was so rude. Can you believe? Oh, that person always in in and then that becomes the place where conflict is confronted. And that just builds resentment and that actually begins to erode your culture. You, you, you lose trust, you lose confidence in people, uh, you start to second guess and that’s when, you know, we typically get clients coming to us saying like we, you know, are we’re struggling. People aren’t engaged our culture, you know, we need to take a survey. We don’t know, you know, we, we need better performance management like we, we get clients because we do organizational development consulting. Come to us with a myriad of entry points and one of the first things we like to do is discovery. And typically when we get a chance to sit in on their meetings when we do we can we can start to see what’s going on in the culture you can see people hanging back you can see people off screen you can see whether or not the chat is lively you can see whether or not people who are commenting or commenting from a place of they’re invested or they’re just commenting because they want to break the silence. And that’s, that’s that begins to tell us, OK, there’s something going on here and it’s not about meetings. It is just the, the meeting is just the, the, the, the place that it’s happening but it is not coming from the meeting, yeah, and can, can I add to that that ultimately when we talk about a thriving organizational’s. Uh, so much of it though is about accountability and so, um, part of a thriving organizational culture is, um, having, uh, having an entity to which people feel accountable to and agreements certainly help to do that, but when people are not accountable to one another are not accountable to a shared space um it is difficult to have a. Thriving organizational culture overall people have to feel accountable to something in an organization in order for accountable to the mission, accountable to one another accountable to the agreements that you all have set as an entity in order for an organizational culture to thrive and if that can’t happen at meetings typically have a purpose we are seeking to execute on something that ultimately is seeking to fulfill the aims of the institution in some capacity. And if people feel like we can’t even get certain things done in meetings, there is a trickle effect that happens over time where people just start to disengage. I’m imagining a trickle up at the meetings and then it develops the and then it works its way up, you know, to, uh, you know, we’re ignoring the mission we’re not fulfilling which is why are so important. I was gonna, oh yeah, uh, people who aren’t active in meetings, how do we, Tiffany, you, you kind of either of you for either of you, but you kind of touched on it, you know, there are some folks who are hanging back and you call them out by name, but, but how are the strategies for encouraging participation. Either in the meeting or maybe after the meeting, maybe coaching after the meeting for folks that you know kind of routinely are not participating even though they they have they have they have to contribute, but for some reason, you know, they’re just not comfortable in. Yeah, I think this is where curiosity is really important. Um, and thinking about how the meeting is designed and whether it’s designed in such a way that everyone can participate or the people that need to participate or participating, so some of the things we talk about in the session are sort of what’s the purpose? Is the purpose clear and are the people who are gonna be there the right people. Sometimes like to diagnose why people aren’t engaging it’s a much broader exercise. It’s not just like Tony, you’re here why aren’t you talking? You know it it could be a follow up with Tony with you and say, hey, I noticed we’ve had a few meetings now and I haven’t heard you participate. I just want to learn more about that if, if that’s OK, you know, like making it safe for you to share what your orientation means. That’s one approach curiosity. Another approach is just taking a step back and thinking about whether the meeting is effective. Is it effectively designed for people to engage and participate? Some of that one of the the the tips that we offer in the session is um frame your agenda items as questions. So instead of just saying. Item 1 or item 3 because you wouldn’t do this as the first item. Item 3, nonprofit radio show. You might reframe it as. What’s the best way to leverage our speaking engagement on nonprofit radio, right, so you are prompting people. You’re, you’re not just giving people information, you’re giving them a thing to engage with. So I think there are, you know, OK Kayla can say a lot more about this. It’s agenda. There’s a, yeah, and if, and if you know what that is as a person designing the agenda. Um, then why not just give it to people in advance, you know, don’t just get on and be like, oh yeah, I just threw the unit together. Like, like we have to be real about how we run meetings. Yeah, we’re, we’re talking about preparation. People, people meet their own stuff together, you know, and then they, and then they late and then they’re like, oh yeah, I didn’t, I’m guilty of this like we, we, it’s, it’s not, it’s not. Hard to be guilty of this stuff, and I think these are the types of things that you, if you don’t step back and ask these questions, get very curious then you end up in this weird place where you’re like no one’s engaging. We just had a meeting no one said anything. I don’t understand it wasn’t helpful. And then if you ask people like one of the questions we ask people in the session is turn to your neighbor and and name a a meeting yay or a meeting nay. Is there a meeting you, a virtual meeting you you attended that was, that was fantastic. It it it it was engaging and why was it facil facilitation? Was it structure? Was it content? Or maybe you have an example of a meetingna. It was insufferable. It was long. It was, it was boring. It was a waste of time and a lot of people have examples of the latter. I was gonna say it’s probably more nays than more nays than. All right, well, we’re working to turn that around. OK, um, the, the your description talks about the tools, tools that promote equity. Are there, are there platforms or resources, uh, that you recommend folks use a cable? Um, just to, to go back to how people are engaging, um, and when we say like what do we do when people aren’t participating, another question that we tend to pose is how people were being asked to participate. So yes, the questions are important, but people should be given multiple, um, ways, particularly in virtual. Weanings of engaging with what you are asking of them, um, and so participation isn’t always going to be verbal. Everyone is not going to participate in that way and so when we talk about what it means um for meetings to be inclusive, it is also about meeting people where they are for you to get what you are asking from them. And so what that looks like in real time is making the chat available to people. It looks like putting people in breakout groups and giving them something to respond to. Sometimes people are not getting what they’re looking for for meetings because they’re just talking at people for quite some time and people don’t know what you want them to do. People need something to do for you to get what you’re trying to get usually. And so, um, there are many platforms that that this can, many ways this can take place. You can put people in breakout groups and give them a Google doc and say put your thoughts here and we’re going to come back and chat. You can have them put in the chat. You can indicate for them that there’s going to be, you know, I’m looking to hear from blank person, blank person, blank person on this question and tee them up. You can do a lot of things to get interaction in that way. Zoom. A whiteboard function you love Zoom is doing things, OK, at this point they have realized that people need to engage in different ways and we are not just sitting here trying to do lecture style meetings until the end of time and that white board function is great. It’s really helpful for collaboration um and so yeah, there are plenty of functions that exist out there to polls. Zoom polls are great in order to to get people talking in that way, um, but. Yeah, I, I really do think that part of inclusivity is um allowing people to engage in a way that best suits their needs, and that is not always just gonna be unming themselves and talking out loud. OK you said meeting people where they are to get what you what you’re hoping to get what you need to get from them because there is, there’s a purpose to all this. Otherwise we shouldn’t have be having the meeting Tiffany, you, I think mentioned, uh, you know that evaluate whether this meeting is even necessary. You’re kind of touching on, you know, so there’s worthy scrutiny of the weekly meeting or the biweekly meeting, you know, they may not be needed. It may not be needed every week like maybe weekly is a default, but we all have the option to say, you know, we don’t, we don’t have any agenda items. Let’s not meet. Possibly it, it really depends on what your goal is in a remote culture. Um, I, there was a time when we all used to work in person and when you had a meeting, it was in the conference room and you showed up at 11:30 and you sat in front of a screen and there was either a PowerPoint or someone talking, sitting around a table, um, and the way you participated in that was very straightforward. You listened, you wrote notes, you kind of threw your hand up when you had something to say, or you didn’t say anything. And that was fine, you know, like I, that’s how meetings were they were very static and if someone’s PowerPoint was good or bad, it didn’t really matter if you tuned out or walked out to go to the bathroom it didn’t matter. It was a lot more implicit and when you move to a remote environment in you know in today’s work workforce workplace rather it’s intergenerational. You have people who have never worked in person, so you actually have to be extremely explicit about what meetings are. What the purpose are, what the expectations are, what we’re trying to accomplish together, why it’s important for people to be engaged, and you have to always connect it back to the mission, and I know people might find that oh man, it’s so much. Why don’t people just should know, but why should they know if you’re not talking about it as a as an organization like. What work really is if you take a step back, is getting a bunch of people who don’t know each other from different walks of life who have all different kinds of ideas about what it means to be with people, to work. Some people are there, we’re all there for our livelihoods, so the stakes are high. But we’re also there for different reasons and, and we there’s no singular code of engagement and so what you have to do in a workplace is really design a place that people can come in, have shared values have shared understanding and have shared buy in on why they’re doing anything that they’re doing and if your meaning is not a clear sort of if it’s not clearly correlated to why you’re there. Then people aren’t gonna care. It’s just gonna be a waste of time. Oh, I’m just in that meeting. I’m gonna do a bunch of other stuff. And so for a lot of what we are trying to convey to folks is you, you gotta get explicit, you gotta get intentional. People aren’t just gonna show up and be fantastic. You, you have to give them instructions. You have to give them directions. You have to give them directives and you have to be creative. You know, like, I’m, I’m, I’m a dancer by training. I love to put on the show. So I’m looking for funny pictures, silly songs. I’m looking for visual, visual representations of what we’re talking about to Kayla’s point, like you gotta be able to engage people in different modalities. Um, live polls are also a really great way to engage people like you’ve, you’ve really got to be willing to rethink why you’re bringing people together and what you’re really asking them to do and a lot of times you’re asking people to come together and think about think and do hard stuff and so if you don’t give them enough information, if you don’t create enough safety if you don’t create enough uh sort of clarity, you’re you’re not gonna get people to do what is needed to be done. So if you have a weekly meeting and you’re like. Oh, it’s really unproductive. Maybe you don’t need it. But it also might be an opportunity to rethink what could we use uh team time for every week and maybe it’s not task because a lot of people need to do tasks when people might be listening there like I don’t need to rethink my weekly one on one. We’re just talking about work that’s moving. Well maybe you need to be talking about something else as a team. You know, maybe you need to be talking about culture, maybe you need to be thinking about sort of checking in on the goals. Maybe you need to be thinking about. Talking to the team about what meetings could be helpful with them what a shared agenda could look like, like there’s so many ways to leverage people’s fantastic skills and contributions that whatever you’re doing may not be the right thing to do that, but I, I’m sure that there are ways to leverage people in a meeting format. That’s perfect. Thank you. All right, OK, let me start with you, Tiffany. They’re both from Tiffany Ferguson is principal consultant and Jenkins McIntyre is managing director and principal consultants sings Tony Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 5 sponsored by Heller Consulting. It’s time for Tony’s sake too. Thank you, Kate. Tales from the gym, continue. This week Oh The insufferable. Jim, know it all. One guy asked for his advice. Uh, this was, this is somebody who we know, um, his name is Rob. We, I’ve, I’ve talked about Rob before, former Marine, we talked about semper fi. Uh, I’ve talked about him a few times. So Rob. At the gym often asked a guy who I’ve never seen before. Uh, about, uh, helping his lower back pain. And I’ve heard Rob ask other people because he sees people doing lower back exercises and. I don’t know, he, he, I over here, you know, I’m like I know the guy, I know everything except the guy’s social security number. I got, so I know he works with a personal, uh, he works with a physical train, sorry, he works with a PT, a physical therapist. He has a physical therapist, but he also asks. Strangers in the gym for their advice because he has this chronic lower back pain. So the guy, uh, of course, um, at this point, I don’t know he’s a know it all, but, uh, learning later that he is a know it all, you know, of course, he’s effusive with the advice. Oh yeah, you got to do these stretches. So he showed him a couple of stretches and do them with light weights, lightweights was the point and bands. You gotta work with the band, the band is very important, the band. You know, the stretchy band thing, all right. So that’s fine. Um, and then the know it all. Uh, moves over to somebody who’s doing planks. Thankfully, it wasn’t me, because I do planks. I do a lot of planks. I do regular forward planks, I do 6 of those, and then I do 6 side planks, 3 on each side. Thankfully, uh, the gymno it all did not come over to me. He went over to somebody else who was doing planks. Maybe the other person, uh, looked, I don’t know, looked like a victim, uh, looked like they wanted help. I don’t know, but he goes over and explains, you should do better plank, you can do better planks. This is unsolicited. He’s just walking over to a stranger. You could do better planks. They’re called around the world, and he demonstrates, he’s he’s in a plank position. And around the world, you rotate one leg at a time, and, and then you rotate your torso, so it’s kind of going around the world, you know, around just doing circles with your torso and your legs, uh, one leg at a time and then the torso. And uh he’s, and he’s saying, make your abs burn. You can make your abs burn, right? Totally unsolicited. I mean he just walks up to a stranger. And then there was another one. The same, this is the same, uh, insufferable gym know it all, going up to with a third person now, well, to, second one unsolicited because the first one, Rob did ask, unsolicited. He goes to, and, and it’s all guys, he’s helping. I don’t, you would have thought, well, maybe he’s insufferable, you know, like he’s, he thinks women don’t know how to work out of the gym or something, but no, he was, he was only going to guys. This one, he said, you, you, you should try doing fewer reps with more weights. Uh, on a machine. The guy, the guy was working on a machine. Now, first of all, that is contrary to what I’ve read about free weights and also machines. You’re supposed to, uh, I think it’s better to do more reps and lower weight. That’s what I’ve read, OK, but again, Mr. uh Insufferable, you know, Jim know it all, he didn’t come up to me. So he’s advising this, uh, other stranger now do fewer reps with more weight, uh, and so. You know, the guy is just, he just has to share his unsolicited, probably unwanted advice with strangers loudly, cause I hear him. You know, keep your advice to yourself. OK, fine. Rob asked you, yeah, yeah. Help Rob. Help all Rob all you want. The weights and the bands and the up and the lower back pain, absolutely. But the other people, leave them alone. Leave them alone. That is Tony’s take too. Kate Sounds like a lot of free coaching to me. Yeah, it’s probably worth what you paid for it. I don’t know. Especially the fewer reps with more weight. That, uh, uh, maybe it’s different goals, like if you want to bulk up versus just tone or something, I don’t know, but you know, you just, you just don’t do these things. You just don’t walk up to strangers and start telling them how to, how to exercise any more than you would tell them how to. I don’t know, drive a car, push a shopping cart, uh, take care of their children, you know, but you just, you just keep that, you keep that shit to yourself. Mhm. Yeah. I like um watching the Instagram influencers who go to the gym and yeah, they’re filming themselves, but they have like a, like a base to give tips and whatnot, and they have like their headphones on and that’s like a pretty big like don’t talk to me sign. And like tap on them. Like, do you not see like this on and then I I don’t know such big influencers that people want their autograph or something? Is that why they’re tapping, it’s usually just like, hey, could I hop on your machine or giving unsolicited advice, you know, people are so entitled and like. Exactly, yeah, entitled. Why are you entitled to invade my space with your unsolicited, uh, advice? You’re not, you’re not. We’ve got Boku but loads more time. Here is RFP request for partnership. Excellent. Thank you for moving us along. Hello and welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 25 NTC. You know what that is? It’s a 2025 nonprofit technology conference. You know that we’re at the Baltimore Convention Center. What you don’t know is, oh, you also. So now that we are sponsored by Heller Consulting software services for nonprofits, what you don’t know is that the current topic is request for partnership redefining the RFP process. Now you do. Now you’re in on the secret. With me now are Kylie Aldridge Ogden and Ashley Stag. Kylie and Ashley are both with Image X Media. Kylie is senior portfolio director, nonprofit, and Ashley is sales director. Kylie, welcome. Thank you, pleasure to have you. Have you done your session 3:30, 3:15, 3:15. OK. Uh, OK, it’s a good thing you have the marketing director here, not, not a properly attired. She’s off brand on the pants, but, but she’s keeping you, she’s keeping you organized. Um, Kylie, I’m just gonna fix your, your right headset. You probably can’t hear me in your right ear. Oh, that makes sense. I’ll fix that. OK. I’m OK. Request for partnership redefining the RFP process. Um, let’s see Ashley furthest furthest from the host, just give us an overview of the topic that you’re gonna cover this 3 o’clock. Sure, thanks so it’s as we kind of redefining the RFP process. It’s about the way that you can structure an RFP process to get better outcome, uh, and also from both sides, vendor and the institution better outcomes and also bring humanity into the process, um, because. We feel that if you’re working with someone in a partnership kind of capacity, it’s really important to know not only that they have the technical aptitude but also that they have the humanity and the ability to work with you in a positive way. I know you’re even renaming it’s it’s request for redefining the RFP process that that uh that subtlety was not lost on otherwise lackluster host. um so so uh. How do we, so the, the RFP responsibility lies with the organization, so they have the power initially I, I, I’m sure in a partnership we want to share the power, but, uh, so Kylie, uh, how do we open the minds of those who take the first step with RFP? Yeah, we get a lot Ash gets the great privilege of reading. Through most of the portfolio the RPs that come into the organization and you get to start when you start looking at them, you start to understand which ones are good and which ones are bad or which ones are the the us being the vendor, them being the person pursuing a partner who, what they’re looking for. You get a sense of it. If it’s really well written, if it is if they’re using things like looking for partnerships, looking for longer term engagements, looking for. Um, instead of just things that are like we have a budget, we have a timeline, we have a very set, you know, 34 or 5 features that we want you to build, it takes away sort of the personal nature of what they’re looking for and most people specifically in the nonprofit space need someone they can trust. They need someone who. It’s showing their creativity who’s showing their um imagination and helping them execute their internal goals and their internal dreams so trying to bring that back together and helping because we see so many and because Ashley sees so many of these sort of RFPs that come out into the general world, you start to get the sense of the ones that are. Strongly worded or strongly written in a way that they’re going to solicit the right partnerships versus people who are just either lowballing the estimates or trying to figure it out or just trying to gain additional workers you want a you want a partner in this process, especially if it’s a longer term engagement. Do you resented. We do, because oftentimes that will lead to a conversation and that’s when we can really shine and kind of suss out from both sides what a partnership could look like. We find that there’s often. Unnecessary tension between procurement and say the wants and needs of the organization so they’ll have wants and needs and then by the time that has been communicated and makes makes its way through procurement, it becomes very boilerplate and it again it’s just not an efficient way to pick a true partner. OK, uh, you mentioned the humanity and I, I questioned you’re bringing humanity into the RFP process. um, Kylie kind of touched on some things. What what what else are you? Encouraging those of us who though not us, I don’t run a nonprofit, those folks who hold the power in the uh in the the now renamed request for partnership relationship. What else are you encouraging those folks to do in their R maybe it’s even before they start writing the pre-typing what should we be thinking? You you can you can almost game the RFP process, I would say so. If you are stuck in a more formal procurement kind of cycle, there are certain things you can do to help again bring that humanity back in and make more educated partnership type decisions so you can do things like research um the different marketplace and get an idea about who you would like to potentially respond. So maybe you have a bit of a closed process where you send it to 12 vendors say instead of opening it up to everyone to respond and having to go through all the work and at the end of that still maybe not getting what you need to make an educated decision. So as an example it’s OK to talk to some of the vendors. It’s yeah it’s like you’re gathering. You’re not cheating, you’re not cheating any of the others that you didn’t get a chance to talk to, but to 4 or 5 to get a I guess a way of appropriateness is our budget appropriate. Yes, certainly, and something else that we we do research and it’s it’s often something we see where there’ll be say maybe 50 vendors have the technical aptitude to accomplish what it is you’re looking for, but again you have to remind yourself that you’re working with these people for 9 months, years. You have to, you have to work well together. There’s often because they’re not willing to talk to you. It makes it tricky and you’re not gonna get it. And that’s what we’re talking about where she’s bringing up the concept of humanity is it’s actually elevating that like reach out, talk to people, have a conversation. There’s a process that will sometimes organizations will go through which is they’ll actually like interview a number of different potential vendors and then they’ll take the list of questions and everything and share it across the board to keep it equal among the vendors that they’re interviewing. But how do you know how an organization works? How do you know if the values match? How do you know if the way that they are going to deal with your team is aligned? Project management and project execution is really critical in the completion phase like RFP is one part, but the second part is how that project is then going to be executed and if there’s not a. If it’s all procurement, there’s no conversations. Once it comes into the to the execution side of it, you’re sort of starting from scratch and you don’t know what everybody’s wanting and you’re kind of figuring that out differently. So anytime you can elevate those sort of interview style, you wouldn’t interview you wouldn’t take an employee without interviewing them, also interview your partners. You have a very active uh media is it like snapping 60 pictures already. We’ve been in this for 8 minutes. That’s great. We appreciate you want lots of content and then you use the best of the best, of course. It takes about 6 pictures to get a good one. You’re not doing portrait, are you? You’re not blowing the nonprofit is coming through. OK, thank you thank you. Um, we’re all working together. It’s humanity. It’s a partnership. There we go. She’s grateful that we have the lights. That’s what it is. It’s, it’s the ambient lights. She’s like finally they look good. So now I’ll take all the pictures. Yeah, this is what I’ve been waiting for. You said it. I did not. No, we can be self deprecating on ourselves. Yeah, no, I, from my stand up comedy, I I always recognized you make fun of yourself, no one can be offended. Um, alright, so can we talk a little more about what, what a good RFP looks like? I mean, uh, Kylie, you tipped off a couple of things, um, but what else, what else should we, now we’re like we’ve done our research phase. Now, we are typing. We probably got something off the internet, some boilerplate, and then we’re hopefully we’re extensively modifying it’s for. You’d be surprised how few extensively modify it, to be honest with you, but the piece that you’re starting to look for is, I would say just to add to it that organizational alignment is a big one that you’re gonna start with. So once you’ve kind of got the RFP, you want to make sure internally within your nonprofit, nonprofits I’ve worked with them for 25 years and there are. So many needs fundamentally within every nonprofit and not everybody is wearing so many hats that when the concept comes up of like hey Tony, what do you want the website to do? Well, you have one goal, another person in your organization will have another goal, another person will have another goal and it’s now trying to figure out across the whole organization of these like 60-70 goals that you’ve elevated. What are the top 10 that you’re actually going to achieve in this process. So making sure you have organizational alignment internally and that. Within that organizational alignment, you’re also setting to your internal people like, hey, I respect your goal of whatever this particular feature is, but We aren’t gonna get to that this time we’re gonna deal with these because this is helping us solve this critical issue. So as you kind of go through writing the appropriate business case for the for the goals that you’re trying to achieve internally is a huge portion portion of the process and making sure that you have that internal alignment. OK, anything else that we wanna see an RFP? Sure, well this is, this is almost kind of skipping beyond the writing and more the evaluation stage, but it is all it is all encompassing. It’s gonna sound probably weird for a sales director to say, but be, be careful of people that pitch well because realistically if you win the like if we were to win the partnership, you’re not dealing with me every day, you’re dealing with Kylie and her team, so it’s important to actually get a handle on who it is you’ll be dealing with and make sure there’s alignment in the fit there and and conversations too. I don’t want to talk to the sales when we get it right, as you said to the evaluation phase. Projects that have come in and they’ve never spoken to us like they’ve never spoken to her yeah it’s it’s all. Please submit, here’s the deadline and then you get an email back that’s like, hey, you’ve won. And then when they start coming into Image X, we’re effectively day one. We’ve never. So tell us about yourself. You’re kind of in that level of like welcome to the family, let’s figure this out together um and. Frequently in those cases, the people that she was working with over email communication aren’t even the same people I’m dealing with. They’re completely different. So there’s a it’s incredibly hard. So you’ll you’ll take the work and we’re happy to start from scratch. The piece that I find from a delivery execution side of that is that you always, you often will have struggles. Getting it moving or figuring out because sometimes the people who are executing the project aren’t aware of the priorities that got put into the procurement process. They don’t know what the contract was negotiated. They don’t actually know many cases what was in the RFP that was sent to them. Um, because it was so siloed, so trying to create that’s where Ashley was talking about bringing the humanity and it’s like have the conversations up front, incorporate your project lead into the process, create organizational alignment internally and decide what are the corporations or the organization’s top priorities. Figure that out, have that internal like do your internal homework and then also meet with the partners and figure out what that’s what is going to be the best personal fit for you. OK, very good. Uh, let’s let’s move to the evaluation. Sure, yeah. No, no, no, no, not at all. Um, what, uh, right, well, clearly with the team that’s gonna be doing the work. Don’t undervalue gut feeling again, this probably sounds like I’m banging on the same drum, but that’s where the humanity piece comes in like you don’t. You, you will have a gut feeling about things you’ll you’ll get OK this this person doesn’t communicate well, um, they don’t provide solid answers they didn’t handle conflict well on the on the initial call. They, you know, there’s all these little things that do build up so certainly yes, there’s you say yes pile a no pile, but also have those maybes, those gut feelings, and then use the opportunity to. Actually engage with the vendors and ask follow up questions if the deal looks too good to be true, it probably is. So if the timeline looks really aggressive, it probably is really aggressive and un unable to be executed in that structure. If the budget looks really low, if everybody’s coming in at 1000 and you have this one that’s 23,000, there’s a really good chance that the 23,000 can achieve that budget. Like there’s a certain perspective of. There’s a gut instinct there that’s like that’s not factual, that’s not realistic it’s too much of an outlier and and where the communications can come from people are really good at assessing like do I, do they seem trustworthy does this person seem like they’ve got my best interest at heart do they specialize in my field? Um, ImageX has a dedicated nonprofit channel. We support over 100 nonprofits within our channel of businesses, but we also have education. We also have commercial, so we see a variety of different things, but do they have a specialty in my specific style of work? Do they actually know what they’re getting into? Do they have history? Can they show evidence of their work? These are all excellent excellent things to be asking, right? OK um. And certainly I mean in terms of your, your gut like if there’s a company that won’t won’t give you access to the team or we don’t know who’s gonna we don’t know yet who’s gonna be assigned and that’s kind of that is that a red flag or is that a fair thing to say we don’t know who’s from I’ll just answer from the there may be a case so there’s times where we’re working with contractor with project during the procurement process and I don’t know so I’m responsible for signing resources like that’s my job within one of the within our organization. And I will, she’ll say who’s going to be on the project team and I may not know. It’s because I don’t know their exact timeline. If they signed in 6 weeks, it could be this one. If they sign in 8 weeks it could be this one. If they take 2 years I don’t like it’s a hard sort of space so they may not know the very specific project resources, but they should be able to provide you with some representatives at least, and we can always do that. I can always have myself or a director of design or a director of development. There’s people who can step in that’ll give you a sense of the organization, but you may not know the exact. Project manager you’re working with just because of the way that resources get settled, yes, certainly, and that’s I guess like what Kylie was speaking about for excuse me what Kylie was speaking about um in terms of having the representative have like she’ll come into the calls on not for profit finalists and she is going to be the consistent figurehead. She’s she’s always going to be there so at least. Again through the process, the institution can meet who will actually be delivering and get a feel for the way she works, what she prioritizes, all these different things, and even though the resources that will actually do the work are somewhat interchangeable because again depends on project start dates at least Kylie is there and you know what she’s about and I can talk to our methodologies and anybody you’re meeting should be able to talk through like your your delivery methodologies your process in terms of your execution process. And making sure that there’s alignment there if you’re gonna if you most nonprofits are looking for a partner, they’re looking for somebody because it’s a lot of work internally to set up a new vendor to set up that process to create that relationship for them they don’t have the time or the energy even if they have the money they don’t have the time and the energy most of the time because there’s so many other things in the world that they need to spend their time doing. So wanting to create longer term partnerships, which is what we find with nonprofits, most of our partners within the nonprofit space have been long term 1015 year partners like we’ve been together through the trenches. You wanna know who you’re going to deal with. You wanna understand how they’re going to execute, what’s their delivery requirements? How do they work with you? How are you going to get information from them? What’s the reporting structure? Figure all of that out because once you’ve answered that can they build it? Does the budget work? You want to make sure that there’s partnership alignment. How about you? Pretty easily, truthfully, most of it like everybody is assuming from a project management perspective staying on budget and time is like some sort of mythical concept of how we do it. It’s mostly through conversation and realistic expectation setting. It’s making sure that as you go through the process within Project Manager there’s a if you’ve seen it before there’s we call it the iron triangle which is no that’s fair it’s called the it’s a project management strategy and it’s literally the iron triangle which is scope budget time. Two can move, one cannot. So when you’re having a conversation with an organization, you sort of say like, what is your what is your like most important piece? Yeah, yeah. So if you sort of look at it, otherwise you can move to, but you can you can move one but the con the concept is is like if if to your organization the number one priority within your project is budget like the number one thing of those three that can’t move is budget. Budget is fixed, then the only things that can move are time and scope so to make sure that we stay within the budget process, I can do one of two things. I can either say to you, we to hit your budget we have to move faster so that it’s more efficient. You need to potentially have less scope to hit your budget you might be able to look at things in a different manner to hit your budget, but we’re still talking about the primary goal is to hit your budget if your primary component is time, OK, so how do you want to play this as an organization we can either. You’re gonna take to get it done we have to add more resources we have to do sort of things, then it becomes a budgetary conversation or conversely you reduce scope to get into the time frame. Everything becomes a mechanism of time and budget from a PM and that’s how they sort of navigate their way through it. So to ensure an organization stays on time and budget, we just have to set realistic expectations for scope. And then as long as the company that we’re working that you’re working with and the partner that you’ve assigned so between the vendor um and the client relationship, if everybody’s got an alignment that the scope is manageable, we’ve done our investigation and research you can do it it’s possible but it’s just communication. It’s called. It’s called the angle. I don’t know who gave it that time. It’s like it’s like who named the Venn diagram. We just sort of use it and accepted the name. I’m assuming it’s it’s a triangle. It’s it’s the same concept that you can have something cheap and. Cheap and easy but not quick like it’s that same sort of like analogy, same concept yeah and then this is actually where again to take it back to the RFP process for a second it’s important because in the RFP it it may be indicated that they have a $100,000 budget. It has to be done in 6 months and this is the scope we’re prescribing so it puts us in a rock and a hard place and without. Having that conversation with them, we don’t know like to Kelly’s point, what the most important priorities are like what what what is not moving. OK, final question for you. Do we need an RFP? Maybe we don’t even, no, we should be questioning, you know, do we even need the RFP process? So why might we not. So selfishly I would say no just pick, pick your vendor but I also do understand that a lot of times with budget budgetary constraints and all of the different um stakeholders within an organization, yes, exactly, yeah, yeah, more nimble organization is gonna go through an RFP if they have 5 or 10 employees don’t yeah no it’s the bigger sort of more bureaucracy if there’s federal funding, if there’s there’s some rules that are put in place. Yeah, so we propose. kind of living with the quote unquote necessary evil of the RFPs, but there’s certain things that you can do to make the process more efficient and again have a better outcome for yourself and the vendor. Yeah, we’ve had it and that’s just as a as a concept we’ve had people go to RFP before they submit, they go out to the public in a general RFP process. The way they’ve written the RFP is either not strong enough or is difficult to interpret. They get their 1020, 30, 50 responses back, and they actually have to recall the RFP often in that case it’s because they yeah yeah I think the worst one worst quote unquote again uh was around 70 yeah 70 in the past year and that’s yeah and that’s the other thing they end up doing more work, yeah, you’re giving yourself a ton more work and but. Yeah, certainly. It is, it is a lot. And when they do it, so what ends up happening or what ended up happening in many of these cases where they aren’t like the specificity within the RFP is not sufficient, we end up having, they end up recalling it because either they’re getting just like budgets that are like $400 500,000 dollars and they have a $100,000 budget or the timelines are completely incorrect. So if you’re not like meeting with them, meeting with the potential vendors, which you can’t do if you’re looking for 70 responses. Um, which is where our team for sure would say go out, do your research, investigate different partners that you think would be a good fit, do a directed RFP, get 5 solid responses to people whom you’ve met with you think might be a good fit for your organization, submit it to them, ask them to fill it in. Now you’re getting 5 from people you’ve already vetted versus this open ended 70 responses as Ashley mentioned that somebody is literally grading them on a, you know. Budget minutes, this means that, you know, take a check grades system and now you can take a look at it. Do yourself a favor. Nobody has time for 70 RFPs. um, so Ashley, as the person who uh at at Image Media, who writes these, why don’t you take us out with the, uh, you know, just uh some, some parting thoughts about why this should be a partnership, a request for partnership. I would say again you’re working with these people, the vendor that you choose for 9 months, probably at minimum, and you’ll be talking to them multiple times a week. If you don’t like the person that you’re dealing with, that’s going to be an incredibly painful process. Usually 2 or 3 times a week. Yeah. OK, we’ll leave it there. Yes, yes, always seek partnerships, especially in the nonprofit space but always seek partnerships. You’re gonna have a more fulfilling like working relationship. All right. That was uh Kylie Aldridge Ogden, the senior portfolio director. And uh also with Kylie is Ashley Stagg, sales director both at ImageX Media. So thank you very much. Thank you Ashley, thanks very much thank you for sharing and thank you for being with Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 25 NTC, the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference where we’re sponsored by Heller Consulting. Next week, more 25 NTC coverage with adopt new software and put the fun in fundraising. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Marc Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for August 11, 2025: Congrats, You’re A Manager, Now What? & Facing Feedback

 

Brenna Holmes & Kerry Lenahan: Congrats, You’re A Manager, Now What?

Our panel shares advice for new managers, which can also support established leaders. They bring strategies for employee-centric growth; self and team advocacy; goal setting; coaching; building trust; and more. They’re Brenna Holmes from Brenna Holmes Advisory Consulting, and Kerry Lenahan at Incubate Growth Consulting. (This is part of our coverage of the 2025 Nonprofit Technology Conference.)

Dana James: Facing Feedback

Dana James wants to make feedback a growth opportunity, for both giver and receiver. She has ways to make feedback constructive for both, so you can create a culture of continuous improvement. Dana is with Community Centric Fundraising. (This is also from our #25NTC coverage.)

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

 

 

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d bear the pain of tubuloreexus if you ruptured me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, with what’s going on. Hey Tony, we’ve got much more from our coverage of the 2025 nonprofit technology conference. Congrats, you’re a manager. Now what? Our panel shares advice for new managers, which can also support established leaders. They bring strategies for employee centric growth, self and team advocacy, goal setting, coaching, building trust, and more. They are Brenna Holmes from Brenna Holmes Advisory Consulting, and Carrie Linehan at Incubate Growth Consulting. Then Facing feedback, Donna James wants to make feedback a growth opportunity for both giver and receiver. She has ways to make feedback constructive for both, so you can create a culture of continuous improvement. Donna is with community centric fundraising. On Tony’s take 2. It’s National Make a Will Month. Here is, congrats, you’re a manager. Now what? Hello and welcome back to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio coverage of the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference where we are together in Baltimore, Maryland. Our 25 NTC coverage is sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. With me now are Brenna Holmes and Kerry Lenehan. Brenna Holmes is a principal at Brenna Holmes Advisory Consulting, aptly named. And Cary Linehan is the principal and founder at Incubate Growth Consulting. So welcome, Brenna, Carrie, welcome. Welcome to nonprofit Radio. Thanks, Tony. Happy to be here. Happy to be here. Thank you. Uh, your session topic is congrats. You’re a manager. Now what? Uh, let’s start with you, Brenda. What, what, why did you feel, uh, well, overview of the topic you talk about in your session? Yeah, so it was a workshop, um, which really enabled a lot of peer learning. That was a lot of what we wanted to show, uh, the community is that you don’t have to go this alone. Many managers are, uh, promoted because they’re wonderful individual contributors and they don’t get any management training when they become a manager. Uh, so they have to balance and figure out kind of on their own and feel very isolated often, uh, how to balance their old duties with their new duties and support their team to really coach them to success. OK, OK, um, so why don’t we, uh, well, let’s start with some, uh, some wisdom, Carry. uh, why don’t you start off with, uh, what, what’s. What’s your, what is your uh advice start starting off advice for uh new leaders? Oh gosh, I would say, you know, we learned in our workshop that 70% of people receive no training at their organization on how to manage their teams and so as Brenna said, you’re not alone there are plenty of great resources. Out there and people who could help, I would recommend to go to your manager, go to your HR team and ask them for some best practices and some training and their advice on on how to get started. OK, or if you’re a smaller shop, you maybe like the outsource the HR function is outsourced, you know what, what, uh, you know, get that, that consulting team or that that agency or. I don’t know. I, I feel like we’re kind of at a loss. It was 70% don’t get, don’t get any training. Like on Friday you weren’t leading managing anyone, and now on Monday you are. Now you’re in charge of, let’s say a small team, like 34 people. All right, it’s not huge, but your responsibilities are enormously different on Monday than they were on Friday. Well, give us some more help in our transition. Yeah, so I think one of the first things is to set expectations with your supervisor around what the goals are for that team, whether it’s 1 people, 1 person or 5 people, uh, if you don’t have clear expectations for the roles and responsibilities not only for yourself but each of those team members, people are just gonna make assumptions and. Fill in the gaps on their own, which is usually gonna lead to some sort of upsetness or misunderstanding misunderstanding at the very least right exactly um and and generally you wanna also do a listening tour maybe you knew those people as peers before maybe you didn’t but schedule some time one on one to have some conversations with them around how they view their day to day. What their understanding is of their job duties, their expectations are what their frustrations are, what their points of happiness are, um, and, and figure out what those or align your goals um with the team for for the team in the department with what their strengths are to the much as much as you can, right? So be that way you’re gonna get get them engaged um and not just feel like they’re widget makers in the drudgery of the day to day. What about the potential awkwardness? Suppose they were your peers on Friday, and now you’re managing them. Uh, it’s awkward. I mean, they’ve told you things as a friend, a work friend that maybe they would, they might not have shared if you, if they, if they knew you were gonna be to be their boss on Monday. Um, how do you overcome that? New relationship awkwardness. Yeah, I don’t think there’s a silver bullet. I think it really is just I don’t know I’ll jump in a huge part of leadership is building trust with your team, and I think that trust you build with people exists whether you’re a peer or whether you’re in a position of management and leadership and I think keeping people’s confidence. Um, when that’s necessary is really helpful and as Brenda said, setting expectations of what your new role is, what their role is, but really creating those clear guidelines and maintaining that trust just as you would if they were your personal friend or they were your peer before. What about the, I don’t know, I’m, I’m positioning, imagining myself in a role I’ll never take because I, I would be a terrible employee. Nobody would ever hire me. I would, I would even, I’d show up late for the interview just to prove that I could, you know, I don’t believe you. Yeah, no, I’d be, no, I would be a bad employee, um. Thankfully, I have my own business, so I don’t, I don’t need others employment, uh. So I envisioned myself in the, OK, it’s Monday morning now. Like, what’s the welcome? Like, how do you, do I, do I, do I need to give a speech to the troops, you know, my, my new team of 3 or 4? Do I, or do I I we’re all in this together, uh, and I’m, I’m gonna do my best to, you know, be vulnerable. No, I don’t, you don’t say that obviously you demonstrate you don’t say it, but you know, do I need to give a speech to the troops Monday morning? I think one of the things that comes up and you’re getting to this is communications and setting expectations and it’s Monday morning you walk into the room in your new role and you haven’t really gotten organized yet and you’re not starting yet and so I think being really honest and see where you are in the process and as Brenda said you know maybe. Talking about saying we’re gonna start with goals and setting goals together where they have agency you just said it listening is so much more important at this moment than talking and a book that I love is um is about it’s focused it’s in our notes and it’s focused on asking the right questions and so it’s about. Not necessarily advising in the beginning but just start by asking your team’s questions related to what they need, what they see the goals need to be where they might feel stuck in accomplishing, you know, the goals that were in front of them before. OK, all right, so, alright, so my General MacArthur, uh, speech to the troops moment, not, not, not appropriate on day one, morning one, all right, more, you know, like we’re gonna be meeting together. I’m gonna meet with you. individually there’s there’s a lot I have to learn, right? A little humility. I know what’s best for the team and here’s what we’re gonna do. OK, that’s a failure. I think that, yeah, um, OK, alright, um, what’s more, you know, uh, your principles of employee centric growth strategies. What are, what are some more, what are some more tactics or strategies for this new manager? Yeah, I think we’ve been speaking to. A lot of that already, right? It is putting the employee at the center letting them have agency over their own future with the company um there’s there’s no guarantee no matter the tenure of or seniority of an of an employee that they’re gonna stay, right? So it really is about helping align their goals with the team goals with the organization’s goals so that people see a mutually beneficial future. Uh, together, OK, yeah, exploring like your own professional development goals, you know, maybe someday you’d like to be in my, my role as the manager, or maybe you wouldn’t. Some people, some people don’t want to lead others and manage. They don’t want that headache. OK, um. Alright, well, what else, what other principles you wanted to share, Carrie? You know, I think touching on one thing that we spent a lot of time on in the workshop was all of a sudden as as an individual contributor you’re project managing yourself and the date you know where you’re heading for a goal and you’re doing your day to day tasks all of a sudden you’re a manager. And now you’re managing a team who has goals and are all individually doing different tasks and we spent a lot of time about the importance of managing your team to outcomes versus trying to micromanage the individual tasks that all of your team members are doing so spending a lot of time making sure everyone’s clear on goals. Clear on a general path on how to get there timelines, milestones, expectations but then stepping back and giving your team the space to do the work was a topic we spent a lot of time on that was really important to the people in the room. So let’s flush some of that out. How do you align the individual tasks with the overall team goals? So a lot of times it’s really about making sure that there’s ownership on from your team members on different parts of the tasks, right? So, so some people might be let’s say you’re in a fundraising team and you have people who are focused on acquisition versus people who are focused on retention. You might have an individual, you might have a team goal of raising say a million dollars that year. And each team member might have a part of that goal which might be revenue and a set of relationships that they’re managing so it’s making sure that they’re clear on I would say the sub goals and. Giving them some general direction but letting them really drive the tasks to achieve those goals and just checking in making sure things are on track and that you feel comfortable but not getting into like let me see that email before you send it out right? yeah yeah and we because a lot of the people in the room self identified as being promoted from within. Versus being an external management hire, uh, we spent, I noticed a lot of the groups talking about how to regulate yourself as the manager to let go of the things that you used to have ownership over and be very, very good at, right, because often we get very protective of those things because I did it great, I did it my way and maybe you should do that too. It’s not always the. Right approach, right? So that’s where you fall into a bit of a micromanagement trap. If you can’t just let that go and you know learn strategic delegation of the different tasks that even if it doesn’t happen exactly around the same course that you would have taken before, it still achieves that that outcome that everybody’s agreed to. You’re also giving a team member or members agency. What you call it strategic delegation? Yeah, you’re recognizing that, you know, I’m not the only person on this team who can do this. Um, here’s your, your authority to to proceed. OK, OK. Uh, what else, uh, I mean we only spent like 12 minutes together. Come on. You did, you did a 90 minute session, right, or an hour session session. What what did you teach folks or share with folks. Yeah, it, I mean, the beautiful thing about it is it was a workshop so there was a lot of peer learning. Carrie and I got to float around 8 different super engaged groups, um, and then listen as they reported back out, um, but one of the other topics that came up both in the quiz or like poll that we asked them to share about what they were interested in and then in organically in the conversations was the difference between coaching and correcting um Zakia who wasn’t able to join us for the radio spot today but. Uh, she shared her personal experience at Animal Legal Defense Fund and uh she had that exact, you know, I’m the direct response fundraising manager and I’m really good at that managing vendor relationships but never individual people until she had to manage individual people um and she got a person who um had been with the organization for a while and already had some. Marks against them in their performance record so she had to learn very early on how to correct um while not getting you know becoming defensive herself or causing them to become defensive and then the value of coaching to uplift um and get them to solve their own problems versus having to dictate and correct in a very um. Explicit manner and Carrie had a really great note from the IFC around like what the definition of coaching itself is. Yeah, you know, I think the word coaching today is used so broadly that it almost has no meaning in a lot of spaces and so. The International coaching Federation, one of the examples they use if you go through any of their courses on what coaching is you know you’re consulting or you’re being corrective in a space where you have the answers and people are asking you the questions that’s consulting coaching is when. You are asking questions because you recognize that the power of the team, the collective knowledge of the team or the individuals in front of you have the answers within them or are very capable of finding those answers for themselves and that’s something that as a manager and a leader you really want to do to empower your team you know one of the traps when you become a manager is people. Will look to you for approval. People will look to you. They want you to tell them what to do to some degree, but the trap in that is you create this dependency where now people feel like, oh I can’t do anything without your permission or unless you tell me it’s the email that Brendan said, you know, I can’t send this email before it’s approved exactly that that’s what it would be. Yeah, so, so I love that distinction between coaching. I’ve never thought about that. Coaching and consulting consultants have the answers and coaching is more helping the person or the team find the answers themselves exactly and and and your your job as a leader is to empower your team. It’s the collective power of the team. It is so much more capable than if you are just telling people to go do tasks all day. Also takes an incredible lot of time and puts a lot of pressure on you individually. Yeah, it sounds unsustainable and detrimental to the awesome awesome. Um, what did you learn it was a workshop so as you were patrolling the tables, not patrolling as you were surveying the various groups, what did you all both come away with? Yeah, one of the biggest ones that I did was uh people are really focused on the generational shifts that are happening right now and. Um, I, I try to actually be less focused on that and more focused on who the individual people are in my own coaching practices with my clients, uh, and so thinking having to talk with each of the different groups around making sure that we’re not projecting our own preconceived notions of a generation or a type of people right stereotyping in in so many ways which often happens subconscious. is also a big part of being a good manager because you can’t expect everyone on the team to have the same work style, the same learning style, um, to perceive and project the same level of investment. That word came up a lot is that this new generation doesn’t seem as invested in the mission they pretty much 5 o’clock, you know, my work is done. Gen Z, we were talking about Gen Zoom I learned. I didn’t know that word zoomers to boomers what we maybe I should call that panel that zoomers to boomers that’s a good one. Um, OK, um, but even within those generations, um, or people like personally I don’t. Work I don’t like my life is not just my work, right? I have many facets um to my personality and other things that I enjoy. I’m very passionate about my work um but it’s not the end all be all. I’m very conscious of boundaries. I very much protect my social life my private life and my time for that and have always with client relationships and. Um, and staff relationships made sure that I walk the walk and not just tell them to do things that I don’t do personally, right? So making sure that you’re not responding to emails in the middle of the night or sending them out at odd hours on the weekends that even if your subject line or your email signature which is becoming more common now says, you know, when I send this is not, does not dictate when you should respond. there is a subconscious. Nudge that the recipient says well my boss is working now maybe I should be too um so I’m a much bigger proponent of you know doing the scheduled send using technology to help us be take the onus off the recipient. Because we don’t know how they’re gonna react, how they’re gonna perceive our intentions, um, and be more conscious about how we make those actions. I know that’s Microsoft uh you can do it in Google, you can do it in any email tool from your phone or your desktop, yeah, it’s very simple now, yeah. And you can pick your time, so time zones also come into play, but I think it is, it’s important for the leaders and the managers themselves of people whether again it’s 11 person or 6 or 14, um, to not put the onus on those recipients. To ensure that like to assume that they’re going to read my intentions correctly. I sent it now but still you’re the boss and, and to your point. She’s working maybe I should be too. Carrie, what did you take away come away? Well, first of all I think the room was full and and there were so many people, everyone was there is really committed to being a great leader and a great manager. They care about their people, they care about the organization they work for and that’s a great starting point and I think so. People after our session came up and we’re saying, you know, where, where can I get training or I know you put some resources in the notes, but how do I do this in a way that I know I’m doing it effectively and so there was a real hunger for more information and for more training in this space on how to lead and manage effectively. OK, is that is that. You can share with listeners can, can you email that to me and I’ll yeah it’s the NTC collaborative note, so I sure they’d be willing to say that. I’ll do that. I know that’s good because I know I have your email. So if you don’t do it I know I can follow up. OK, I’m putting Brenna. I’m putting my notes right now. Brenna. OK. All right, so we’ll share that with listeners. Um, good, you know, uh, yeah, support like the managers need support. They also need to be supporting their team. You, you play a little bit of a therapy role, right? Like, um, being there as a confidant for, for both men, you know, people of similar peer group in the organization as well as your individual team members that goes to the trust that you talked about Carrie, I mean breach somebody’s confidence once and then it’ll be all over it’ll be all over the office you’re not a trustworthy person. Forget about it. You may as well change jobs. you have to have your team’s back at all times and sometimes that’s hard if there’s moments where you might not be on the same page as your team member, but you have that moment where you don’t have their back and it’s obvious and that trust goes away an opportunity where you know someone says something in confidence and and then you can say. Can I share this, you know, get their consent. Maybe maybe they came to you not wanting you to share, but if, if you can. Uh, uh, help them see, help them recognize that change is really only gonna happen if I can share it. Can I share it anonymously, maybe, you know, a team member came to me and shared this. Hopefully it’s not something that would be identifiable to that person, you know, but um if I to get their consent to share it. Anonymously or otherwise because that’s really the only way I can help make a change, but you know, at least, at least you’re offering they may say, no, no, you, I don’t want I no don’t share and then of course you don’t, but at least you’re offering that level of support like to elevate their their voice and their concern, yeah and I think I mean managers have the opportunity to. Translate that feedback um that is shared with them to level it up to their own supervisors even if they’re not sharing like the specific anecdote right and I think that is a level of responsibility that the managers have is to be that professional communicator in between the people they manage and the higher ups so depending on what level of mid-level management you are that could be the CEO suite and making sure that there are like really strong. Professional development paths for your team advocating acting as an advocate for your team um or there could be more layers between you and them right but that is a huge role of of an effective manager is making sure that you are that voice for their issues, their concerns, uh, which are yours because you know the the buck stops here with you. Um, and everything, no matter who on the team is res quote unquote responsible for each individual thing, it all rolls up to you. So, uh, that came up a lot in the conversation yesterday is around how maybe you weren’t in a communications-esque role before, you know, you’re a developer, you’re an engineer, you’re a designer, um, and having to become that communicator so that you can be the advocate for your team as well as being able to. Uh, tell the corporate policies in an appropriate way to, uh, in the other direction is, is critical. OK. All right, Carrie, why don’t you leave us with some parting thoughts about for, for new leaders encouragement, encouragement for new leaders. Uh, as we said before, you’re not alone. Find a peer group, find a few formal or informal mentors that you can bounce ideas off of, um, that you can check in with and you know, really check yourself I think. That is one thing that will help you. I will also say like taken straight from Brene Brown’s book about we don’t rise to the level of our goals we fall to the levels of our systems set up systems for yourself that make it easy to manage things like. Standing agendas for your weekly meetings, 90 day check-ins with your team members where you get to go deep with them on how they’re performing and where they need help and what’s going really well, um, those setting up those systems will make your life a lot easier and also create consistent expectations for your team members so I think those are two things that you can do as a new manager to just get off on a confident and good foot. Thank you. Thank you. My pleasure. They are Brenna Holmes, principal at Brenna Holmes Advisory Consulting, and Kerry Linehan, principal and founder at Incubate Growth Consulting. Cool. Kerry, I’m sorry, Brenna, Kerry, thank you very much. Thank you. Thanks, pleasure and thank you for being with Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 25 NTC where our coverage is sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. It’s time for Tony’s take two. Thank you, Kate. It’s the August month of August, and that can only mean one thing. Everyone knows it’s National Make a Will Month. You know that wills are fundamental, foundational to the work that I do, planned giving fundraising. So how could we not be celebrating this August month. When the national fever is, is, it’s, it’s obvious in the streets. The, the revelry, the celebrations, I’m, I’m concerned that, that the, that the nation is going to peak too soon with all the revelry, with all the commotion that’s going on because we’ve got this is a 31 day month. We’re only a couple of weeks in. This is only that this, this is coming out only the 2nd week, so please, please. Pace yourself. Take your time as you’re celebrating National Make a Will Month. Actually, it might even be a good idea to have a buddy so that if you get carried away, your buddy, your designated, uh, driver, so to speak, right? They can, they can bring you back down to earth, calm you, remind you that there are weeks left of National Make a Will Month. So, I don’t want you to peak too soon. Take your time. I’ll share, uh, what I’ve been doing on LinkedIn is sharing my uh 18. The 18 reasons why wills are the way to launch your planned giving fundraising at your nonprofit. So, I certainly can’t do all 18, uh, in one show. That’s just too much and plus we have to space them out so that people do, so that you do pace yourself, pace only a couple at a time. So, like, I only give number one. The number one reason why wills are the way to launch plan giving fundraising at your nonprofit. Because they are the most popular planned gift by far. You’ll see at least 75%, maybe as much as 90% of all the gifts in your complete planned giving program are gonna be simple gifts in wills. They’re the low hanging fruit. So that’s the number one reason. Um, I’m not gonna be able to do all 18 reasons, you know, throughout the month of this show. Uh, because it’s just, you know, it gets a little laborious, but you can read them, if you follow me on LinkedIn, I’ll be doing them throughout the month, uh, there on my LinkedIn page. And um National Make a Will Month, the August month of August. Please, pace yourself. Don’t get carried away. That is Tony’s take too. Kate I was getting excited towards the beginning cause you were saying, oh, you know what this month is? And I’m like, it’s the month I get to go to my uncle’s beach house. I’m still excited for Make a Will Month, but I’m kind of excited to go to my uncle’s beach house. OK. Well, it’s, it’s those are difficult priorities to balance. Uh, we all have our cross to bear. They’re, they’re both revelatory, celebratory. You know, the, the, uh, commotion in the streets. I, I mean, I see it on my street, you know, it’s apparent, it’s a parent. So I can understand your, your conundrum about which, which is, uh, deserves more. Uh, more celebration, more. Are you celebrating? Are you like getting ready, the house ready, and yeah, I’ll be celebrating when you leave. That, that’ll be actually my celebration, so. No, I’m looking forward to you all coming down, of course, of course. I look forward to it every year. Uh, no, I actually clean the house after you leave because you bring two dogs. Now you got 2 dogs coming instead of just one. That’s so exciting twice the fur and, and, uh, make sure it’s twice the number of legs that have to be kept off my sofas. Oh yeah, we are trying to teach him, you know, down. Yes, good, off, off, down, don’t even get started, not even off. It shouldn’t even be off because off suggests that he’s already on. We don’t want, we don’t want, it’s Curtis. We don’t want Curtis on. So not just off, off is not good enough, should be no. No, yeah, that’s a big one. OK. Well, we’ve got book who but loads more time. Here is facing feedback. Hello and welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, my guest loves Podfather. I do. I love it. Welcome to our 2025 nonprofit technology conference coverage. We are sponsored here by Heller Consulting Technology Services for nonprofits. The guest that loves the the podfather thing is Donna James, Systems design and engagement strategist at Community Centric fundraising. Welcome, Donna. Thank you. Thanks for having me. I really pleasure. My pleasure. Absolutely. Your session topic is facing feedback. Adventures in emotional capacity. Yes, give me an overview of uh what you covered in your session. Yeah, it was wonderful, you know, I, I try to give folks some tools, some real like meat and potatoes of the meal, um, but feedback is such a, such a heavy thing sometimes I open it up with, uh, someone told me once that the four most hateful words in the English language are we need to talk. And the work spin of that is I have feedback for you so I ask people just how they feel first when they hear that um and then we walk through like there are true tried and tested frameworks there’s language that’s being shared across the sector now to really. Um, I guess like standardize is maybe a word, but I would say like ground us so that we are having the same conversation when we use these words, um, so I give folks a real overview of a solid feedback loop and those steps, um, and then I try to talk about the weight of it because to your point it, it is. Heavy to receive um but it’s also really vulnerable to give feedback and that human experience is is where the real work is and that I think I I got hip to real early in my career was like how we work together sometimes feels a lot more um the topic that we need to be having versus like what we’re doing. is that because you were a troublesome employee and I’m a lot. I have feedback for you. Did you get that a lot? I think it was because I noticed people didn’t like it. Like I’m, uh, I grew up, uh, singing. I went to Berkeley College of Music. I worked there as well, yeah, yes, in Boston, um, so I’m like oriented to this true what I think is like the artist instinct of this call and response, um, and so for me I was always that. That person who was like, can we get quarterly emails? Can we talk about it this week? Like how do you think I’m doing this week? And I, you know, to her credit, I had this wonderful boss was one of my first bosses who felt the same way and we were sort of the weirdos and um I don’t know I’ve I’ve always sort of been interested in how the audience is receiving. I’ve always been grounded in that and that’s probably because I’m used to holding the microphone and looking at their souls and hope that we’re connecting and. Um, so for me it it feels so natural, but to find that it’s something that feels so, you know, it could be anxiety ridden for so many people. It can feel like such a stopping point and. Um, I think I got very passionate about helping that because I’ve always worked with teams that like I look around and they’re so talented and I know the answers are in this room and to cease collaboration sort of stagnated or or you know my that boss called them bubble ups bubble ups are happening, but there weren’t always work flows to deal with that, right? There wasn’t always a framework or a leader in the room who was like, OK, let’s dig into this um conflict feels like a dirty word and for me, no dissonance is the story, right? That’s how. We get to resolve, we have to have that dissonance we have to have it and in it is the good juicy story that’s gonna make us inspired, make us keep going and it’s an opportunity. I can tell because part of the emotional capacity um background resonating with the audience looking to their soul. How am I being received? How is this performance being received? So how is this feedback being received? All right, um. Uh, how about we, uh, we start with the, uh, the giver of the, of the feedback. Um, this is a weight, right? I mean, for that person as well we should we need to recognize it’s not, uh, very few people I, I believe people are generally good, so I think very few people take pleasure in giving the feedback that’s critical. Um, how can we as the giver. Help I guess help ourselves and be eventually and then we’ll get to helping the recipient because, well, yeah, yeah, how can we be helping ourselves and be helping the recipient because then we’ll talk about what the recipient needs to do to help themselves. All right, so what. We do. Absolutely I think um first is like accepting that it’s gonna feel vulnerable I think sometimes especially for those of us who’ve been in management positions for a long time they’re sort of like I should be able to do this but like. For me the practice of feedback should feel vulnerable because when you are vulnerable you’re connecting, right? If you’re vulnerable you’re open to receive those signals from the other person to think about how it’s landing with them if you’re not feeling vulnerable you’re probably not doing feedback you’re probably like commenting you’re probably not connecting and if there isn’t that two way then for me that’s not the best kind of feedback, right? That’s more evaluative critique and I don’t necessarily consider it the same thing. OK, um, so. It we acknowledge that. You’re a human being, being spoiler alert. If you, if you feel vulnerable about this, if you’re feeling empathy to the person you’re about to have a conversation with, you’re in a good spot you’re in a good spot and like. There’s feedback and feedback you can ask someone how they receive feedback. I have a a lovely little um graphic that I share that actually an audience member contributed from a previous session and now I’ve incorporated it but it’s the um feedback cookies, right? Um we talk about the feedback sandwich a lot. The sandwich’s cover has been blown like we all see it coming, it’s over. The feedback sandwich is good uh they say to say something good, something affirming, and then you give the critique in the middle and then you end it with another affirming right and like that is done, but. It’s such a frame that I think people lock into so easy that like you can smell it coming you’re just like OK what are you trying to like hide in the sandwich you know what is that? Just say the thing um this this piece and I her name is Liz and I can’t remember the last name for the life of me, but. Um, there are like 9 or 10 cookies and it’s like a black and white cookie, like give me the good and the bad or like give me dough like just say it unfiltered, give me the things is it a macaron where you want like elegant wording and like some some good meaty like critical information in the middle um and just giving folks a chance to define and like advise you. On how to work with them is something that not everybody has had the experience to do but it works really well because then that person who’s receiving the feedback knows when to expect it. I feel like we have such a deep relationship with anxiety nowadays that like just allowing people to understand when like the work flow is going to happen and having it be familiar does so much to allow them to receive the feedback as well. Um, the, the, uh, the 10 cookies, can we work in some of the Christmas ones? Like, I like, I like the one that’s filled with the jam, you know, it’s got that cookie that lump or the one with the chocolate kiss in it or the the pinoli nuts, the pine nut pine pine nuts, nuts, cookies. I’m gonna need those in in I don’t know if they’re they’re not in there, but they’re one of people asked yesterday they were like sometimes. Cookie, I’m different, you know, every day I’d like to see the holiday cookie assort. I like it. Yeah, maybe when you’re in the Christmas spirit, this is how you like to this is how I like it. I have some news feedback. I did tell the bonus points for these types of cookies and the people. and then keep the cookie. That’s bonus if you wanna do that. Um, any more from the from the giver’s perspective? Well, what can we do to to uh go beyond just the empathy that we feel. So before we get to the recipient, what, what that person should be doing to take care of themselves, what can we do as the The donor, I don’t know, we’re not really we’re not really donating constructive, but we’re the giver, we’re the speaker. What can we do to help the person we’re about to have a conversation with? Yeah, yeah, I think, um, particularly like in this kind of dynamic where we’re obviously talking about somebody who either has like manager oversight over the person or the project or something like that um so in that way like really grounding it on like what is the goal, what are we working toward together here um so that that collaborative spirit and like. Knowing that this conversation is grounded in this and this only like this is an intentional conversation this is not your whole year’s evaluative right moment in context context is key, right? and and again like letting people know I do think making sure that if you are giving feedback and it’s only critical right, that’s gonna make it challenging to give feedback in the future for those of us that are managers making sure that you are giving an overwhelming amount of like affirming feedback or like. Like I appreciate when you do this or I really noticed that or I wanna celebrate you for this that can help people have a better experience and relationship to feedback in general, right? I think that’s the biggest sort of call to action that I have for all of us is like work on your relationship with feedback regardless of your preciality um regardless of how often you work with it um for me feedback can manifest in the individual relationships but it’s also about our programming, right? Everybody at this space is working on things. And hoping that the audiences and the constituents they serve are like appreciating that effort um but often we try to get things into such a perfect place that we don’t open ourselves up to allow them to have like collaborative insight and ownership in the experience um so in that way if we’re talking with groups letting people process the feedback together, share and dialogue about how they’re receiving it because the way I receive your feedback if it’s about a general thing, not me, right? Um, might be very different than the way the person next to us receives it and sees the insights in it, so really pulling it out and, and making it like a creative project like why not? It’s just relationship building we’re just calling it feedback and we’re all here for the same goal and we’re all here for the same for the same mission, yeah, I want you to like it. Right, right, um, let’s switch then to the recipient. OK, we’ve just heard the words. um, I have feedback for you. Your heart sinks. We internalize, we personalize mistakes. uh, well, internalizing, I mean, you’re gonna take, you’re gonna take responsibility, assuming the conversation is appropriately placed. Let’s assume that we got the right. Yes, let’s assume we have the the right person delivering they’ve done their work. Or what do we, how can we take care of ourselves? Yeah, one of the things I highlight for folks in this session is I believe they’re like barriers to day to day feedback practice um some of those are defensiveness, perfectionism quantity over quality, right? These are familiar things, um, but in particular our defensiveness spikes super hard, right? So what can you do and how are you working on your awareness with like what you bring to the table, right? I’m curious about what people have to offer me because there’s nothing. You can say that’s gonna take away what I know I have, you know, um, and most folks are working on something, right? I would hope that when you’re offering someone specific feedback about the way that they work it’s probably in line with the goal that they shared with you if you’re a manager, right? Maybe I say you know this year I’m really wanting to work on the relationships I have around the office so that I can be more collaborative, right? If I’m gonna get feedback about that later then that feels helpful you’re helping me with my goal and in that way we’re co-creating this like work experience. Together and it feels a little bit more intentional and a little bit more about us and our careers and our relationships and our communities and less about like the numbers and the metrics and things like that um it makes it real we are so mission aligned in the sector right? it’s personal whether or not we want it to be at some point um it it’s deeply meaningful work for us so it’s hard to separate that out so to own that there is a personal attachment and that it is really meaningful and allowing it can let us come at it from a more authentic place I think. We’re, you and I are assuming that the uh the uh giver of this information is, is, uh, doing it humanely. suppose it’s not, it’s suppose it’s more antagonistic. I don’t know, maybe, maybe even threatening or if, but if not threatening, just, you know, it’s uh it’s, it’s uh. Inhumanly, you know, being being conveyed, yeah, but it’s being done harshly, harshly, maybe condescending feedback, OK, I’m getting it the person talking to me and now is condescending and harsh. What do I, what do I do? I guess it depends on the situation right? for for those of us who are doing this with like programs if it’s like the audience right maybe our community is like I don’t know why you’re doing things like this y’all are not being helpful. I know you’re supposed to be here to be helping us you’re not being helpful. I don’t like it. I hate you right? that’s we don’t want that we don’t wanna hear that but. I believe that every engagement is a bit of feedback, right? And even if it is feelings forward there’s something underneath it so when we’re dealing with someone that like we are responsible for um you know I’m highlighting that power dynamic of like are we the org and they’re the audience they’re the community, um, it’s our responsibility to be more curious, right? People are going to have feelings not everybody’s gonna be a feedback practitioner, right? Your manager may not be a feedback practitioner this may not be something that they have really leaned into it may be an area where they could grow, um, whether or not you have the kind of relief. where you can offer feedback to your manager is something that may or may not be um realistic um obviously we would hope for that as an ideal but I think the most important thing that folks can do is remember that feedback offered it’s your prerogative and it’s your artistry to decide what feedback you’re gonna receive what is useful for you and and how you can apply it for your ultimate goals, right? Sometimes we’re getting feedback that. You know, if someone says to me like, hey, I really think that you should dress a little bit more subtle. I think that you’ll blend in a little bit better here. Well, that has never been my goal, Tony. My goal has never been to to fit in. It’s also never been realistic. um, she’s loud, she’s an artist, she loves to make a noise like it’s just not gonna jive with me, so I would say a royal blue and also watermelon fingernails which I thought. Look like Christmas trees. Uh, yeah, it could be maybe I was like you a little bit. Could be Christmas, but it’s watermelon. I knew I knew it wasn’t Christmas, but, uh, yeah, the watermelon. um, yeah, all right, so, but we also, you know, we want to, I think subsumed that what you’re saying is we want to be able to understand what’s being told to us. So, you know, if it’s not coming through because it’s, there’s, there’s this harshness and rhetoric and condescension, you know, I. I just don’t understand what you’re, I, I don’t understand what you’re, what we’re trying to get to what you’re trying to convey. I, I don’t have a full understanding of what it is I need to do differently to support the team. Yeah, I’m not sure what I’m supposed to pull out of this to to shift yeah I think a ton of us have been in that position too. I would say like that it’s it’s always gonna be curiosity, right? I’m curious about what you’re trying to get at. I’m really curious. I really wanna figure it out. And in that way we might have to get good at asking questions and managing up um and I think that’s realistic for a lot of us you know I think there was a wonderful session here not to keep shouting out all the wonderful sessions that have been happening but there was one yesterday around um things I wish I knew before I became a people manager and like. It’s a lot to be in a management position to know that these folks are impacted by the way that you navigate um even if you don’t mean it they’re reacting to the way that you model right it’s such a deep responsibility to be a a people manager and I don’t know that everyone approaches um climbing a corporate ladder or a nonprofit ladder or your consulting growth or whatever it is aware of that um. But our collaboration is such a big part of no matter how we work collaboration is there so if you don’t have a comfort with this feedback how can we build a shared culture together, call and response with them I guess um it’s gonna get in your way no matter what, no matter how you work you can’t move around the workforce in any way and get away from working with people that’s just we’re all we have Tony we’re all we have. I appreciate what you said nothing you can say is. Take away anything that I know I have, yeah, and that’s work, right? I don’t say that lightly, right? she’s still on her journey we’re all gonna do it but hopefully you have that community around you who can mirror back to you, how they see you, um, you know, we have to be developing feedback loops everywhere in our personal lives. We should have that, that sense of belonging in our life to come back to because to your point, someone’s gonna come at you sideways and. Like you get to be mad right? whether or not you blow up in the office I’m gonna say no I’m gonna say I’m gonna say no that’s not a not a tip that I’m gonna offer but like you get to have feelings you’re a person, right? You get to process it, you get to feel some way about it and then you get to come back to the table and figure out like how am I gonna get to like what’s really helpful in what was offered, how am I gonna apply it to benefit me and my growth and this these projects that I care so much about. Um, you have some, you got a story you can share? Yeah, then your, your session description said you had. I tell a little bit of um I give folks reflection around um when I pointed out the barriers to day to day feedback I always ask the audience because you know we trend this way and that way we’re in a different year. I asked them. Um, to reflect on like these barrier things, and I asked them like where do you recognize perfectionism, defensiveness, quality over quantity, either or thinking, um, because often these are the things that stop us from receiving feedback we dismiss it and we have to be really really careful who’s feedback we’re dismissing and why. Um, and so I asked them like, do you recognize these from anything else, and I wanna give super props to N10, um, because this space half the room shouted in unison, these are the tenets of white supremacy culture like they were so aware, um, and that work and that like the pattern of these popping up and realizing that they’re such human experiences is such deep work. So I always ask folks, are there any of these that you don’t um recognize and then we dive into stories of how we’ve seen these things pop up in our work and how kind of funny it can be because um it feels so obvious when we’re all sitting together in reflection mode but when you’re working right often sense of urgency pops up in nonprofit so much right because these are really um inherent needs right like. We’re doing real work, yeah, yeah, especially now, yeah, so we’ll talk about you know ways we’ve seen good intentions show up in ways that are just sometimes frankly hilarious, you know, folks showing up with items or goods thinking that this is the answer and this is what you need and now your capacity is a little bit more drained because you’ve got a piano and 7 broken guitars and. Someone at the staff has to do something with them, you know, um, there’s such a way that these things pop up and if we can for for me what I try to do is like. You know, have your little joker moment laugh a little bit you get to, you have to, um, and if you can bring humor to the ways that we are so humanly fallible, like can we all enjoy this together this sitcom’s hilarious like we’re we’re just meat sacks of emotion clanging up against each other trying to make the world better and if we can bring some of that presence to it like people are joy people are generous people are. Fascinating and and maybe that’s just kind of why I’ve ended up doing the kind of work that I do, but you know an artist is curious the musicians wanna name what’s going on under the surface and um there’s so much under the surface when we’re all really dedicated to good work it’s personal like we said. It’s a beautiful place to live. All right. Donna James, if you want to connect with Donna on LinkedIn, uh, she spells her first name D A N A. Donna James, systems design and engagement strategist at Community Centric fundraising. Thank you for sharing, Donna. Thank you Tony. Great great topic. Oh, thank you. Thank you very much and thank you for being with Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference. Our coverage is sponsored by Heller Consulting. Next week, inclusive and engaging virtual meetings and RFP request for partnership. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out there and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for August 4, 2025: Fundraising Storytelling To Show Your Impact & 5 Common Email Marketing Mistakes And How To Fix Them

 

Megan Castle: Fundraising Storytelling To Show Your Impact

Lots of nonprofits don’t have direct monetary impact to promote their work. If that’s you, Megan Castle has practical tips and strategies to collect and distribute quality, down-to-earth stories from your real supporters. She’ll help you engage your audiences, increase donations and save team time. Megan is CEO of Soapboxx. (This is part of our coverage of the 2025 Nonprofit Technology Conference.)

Patty Breech: 5 Common Email Marketing Mistakes And How To Fix Them

Yes, email performs well. Period. But you want your email campaigns to perform best. Are you making typical mistakes with inducing folks to join your list; welcoming them; bloating your messaging; talking too much about you; and, in who’s sending? Patty Breech explains these common mistakes and how to correct them. She’s founder and CEO of The Purpose Collective. (This is also part of our #25NTC coverage.)

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

 

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I am your aptly named host and I’m the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I hope you loved last week’s show, the 750th. Great fun. Great fun. Hope you’re with us. And I’m glad you’re with us this week. Because I’d suffer with duodnitis if you inflamed me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer Kate with what’s on the menu. Hey Tony, I hope our listeners are hungry for more of our 25 NTC coverage. Fundraising storytelling, to show your impact. Lots of nonprofits don’t have direct monetary impact to promote their work. If that’s you, Meghan Cassle has practical tips and strategies to collect and distribute quality, down to earth stories from your real supporters. She’ll help you engage your audiences, increase donations, and save team time. Megan is CEO of Soapbox. Then 5 common email marketing mistakes and how to fix them. Yes, email performs well, period. But you want your email campaigns to perform best. Are you making typical mistakes with inducing folks to join your list? Welcoming them, bloating your messaging, talking too much about you, and in who’s sending. Patty Bree explains these common mistakes and how to correct them. She is founder and CEO of The Purpose Collective. On Tony’s take too. Beware of this planned giving scam. Here is fundraising storytelling to show your impact. Thanks for being with our 25 NTC coverage. That’s the 2025 nonprofit technology conference. We are all together at the Baltimore Convention Center where our coverage is sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. With me now is Megan Cassle, CEO at Soapbox. Welcome, Megan. Thanks. Excited to be here. You are. I am. I’m glad to hear it. Your session topic is show. Don’t tell your impact using stories as a foundation of your fundraising. Uh, first, before we get into storytelling. Your advice and uh strategies around that. Why don’t you just share what the soapbox about the CEO? Sure, yeah, so is a software platform that was built for nonprofits to help different organizations collect and share stories from their supporters for advocacy purposes, fundraising, marketing, really anything that you would want to use user generated style storytelling for. So our mission is really to help organizations that often have low capacity. Low resources, low budgets, collect stories that are really authentic and not highly produced like a style videos, but people sitting on their own couch in their own living room talking about ways that they’ve been impacted by policies or different things in their own communities and leveraging those stories for nonprofits to be able to use them for a number of different ways. So is your background as software developer or nonprofits or both? Good question. Uh, my background is in journalism and nonprofit marketing. Yeah, so I started off as a journalist, but this has really been an interesting intersection between storytelling and marketing in my current role because we do a lot of storytelling, of course, but with a lot of different nonprofits we’re working with a little over 70 but um it’s a lot of marketing too because once you get the stories, how to get the stories and how to share the stories is all about marketing. Right. Um So you’re um. I guess your your session is about uh helping nonprofits that don’t have a direct uh monetary impact to to share with with folks uh so the easy case, you know, for $5 a day you can buy lunch for children or pay for spay neuter, etc. so folks that don’t have this kind of monetary impact. So what um what types of organizations are you focusing on in your session? Yeah, so it was hard to come up with the learning objectives because I think there’s a lot of different ways that we could go with this, um, but it sounds like you read the description. That is true that it’s excellent work, homework you listen to some of our episodes. I listen to. preparing for each other. Trying to be as eloquent and analytical as the rest of them. Um, but yeah, so we work with a lot of organizations like I said that are doing advocacy work and it’s really hard to show that there’s like a tangible impact to that kind of work which often deincentivizes donors, not only to donate more amounts but also to donate more frequently or become a reoccurring donor, things like that. It feels in a world of instant gratification it’s really easy to want to donate somewhere where you know exactly what essentially product you’re buying for that and when it’s an organization that says that they’re going to work on economic justice or childcare policy and maybe that’s a 15 year fight or something that we’re still fighting for, it’s really hard to prove that those donor dollars actually went to something that’s making a real difference in their own community. And beyond that, even just proving that it’s something that’s going to impact their family as an independent person and not just like the whole of America. I think a lot of these things become very abstract, so being able to tell somebody that. By donating this $20 on a reoccurring level, it’s gonna be something that’s gonna impact your individual family is something that’s really, really difficult for nonprofits to prove and through storytelling I think that’s really the only way to do it is being able to have people that they can relate to and that seem like a real person and a real human kind of show the impacts that they’re actually making on like a daily or yearly or quarterly kind of way. I there any kind of Uh, infrastructure, uh, I don’t mean that technical sense, but like processes that we need to have in place before we can start to get, you know, these down to earth good, good stories, valuable stories. Yeah, I think that there is. I think a lot of organizations often go for quantity over quality in this sense and that. They also because they’re usually the bandwidth of the capacity that these organizations have for marketing or communications is has a big play here. I think a lot of the times when you say you need to be collecting stories, the first thing that nonprofits think is they’re like oh we don’t have a person for that, we don’t have the capacity for that, we don’t have a video crew for that and you really don’t need any of those things. Um, it’s something that a lot of Almost everybody in the world has a smartphone with a camera on it and it could be accessible for them to be able to record something right there that can help your organization make a really big difference, um, but also meeting people where they are I think is really important. So if it’s a written story that comes from email or it’s a comment on Facebook that you can kind of use to turn into a story or potentially contact that person on an individual level to get a video from them later, I think that’s great. Um, that’s really what our tool has done in a lot of ways is just make the storytelling more accessible to people so it doesn’t feel like such a heavy lift to do it, but I think in terms of the idea of like what kind of process we can have, I think like I said, meeting people where they are to make it incredibly easy and being OK with it not being perfect. I think a lot of organizations want the really polished like end of year wrap up video that looks beautiful. And costs like 80 for a 3 minute video that they can use for a bunch of different things, but truly the most impact we’ve seen with the stories that come in are often like I said, like somebody sitting on a couch in their own living room talking about how expensive childcare is and how a specific organization can maybe help that. um. Very low production value, high sincerity, right? People speaking from the heart, genuine, not actors like their hair is messy doesn’t matter what the lighting is. I mean, as long as they can be pretty well and it’ll be. Yeah, maybe they have a cluttered kitchen behind them or kids running around in the background yelling and that’s all the better. Uh, people feel the same way about editing the videos when they come in. There’s gonna be a lot of ums or ahs or any of these things in them, and they’re always like, well, how can we cut these out so it has a higher production value, but in the end that’s how we all talk on a daily basis, so making it seem really conversational and relatable is actually a lot more impactful than having a highly produced video style ad. Um, you just complimented, uh, nonprofit radio without knowing it because I don’t edit out ums and ahs and somebody on a previous panel today said, uh, you know, there are video editors, I mean audio editors, and there are that you can just give your file to and they’ll, they’ll spot the ums and ahs. and I said no, but that’s human. You know that’s the way we talk and I want a conversational show, you know, uh, we’re, it’s not David Muir. And I I think it’s easier for people to follow along if it sounds like a conversation than it is if it’s like perfect. I think, yeah, I don’t you think it’s easier to follow too? I do. I mean if it’s we’re used to dialogue, right? I think that we’re used to having this is we’re having a conversation right now that I could have with valid. I think your podcast is the best podcast. On the market, yeah, but you’re gonna make me sound perfect, right? Yeah, there’s nothing to do. OK. Alright, so we’re talking, the point is it doesn’t have to be high production value, right, to be sincere. I mean you were saying you think it’s more listenable, more approachable it’s more approachable, right? It is, yeah, and I think, um, just to repeat myself again, I think meeting people where they are is really important. I think a lot of nonprofits have the issue also that their donors aren’t always the same people that their organization is impacting. So creating like networking capabilities or just like being in the community and making partnerships with community members that are maybe working on the ground with people that you are impacting is a really good way to connect with people to get stories, but this is also something when we talk about this we want it to feel, especially my session is specifically about fundraising, how to use storytelling to increase your donor dollars and we don’t want this to feel exploitative. It shouldn’t feel like something that’s like we’re gonna use your really personal story about Medicaid or something like that. able to get donor dollars. It should be something that feels really empowering. People are really struggling out there and that’s why nonprofits exist, right, is for the common good of people that are having issues or things in their in their world that they need help with. Um, so empowering people to uplift their voices is Really, I think in a lot of ways empowering to them but it it it works really well for nonprofits as well, but it should feel like something that they’re a part of and we often see that organizations that include their donors or people impacted in their own storytelling um are actually usually going to donate more because now they have an attachment or like a sense of ownership in the organization because now they’re a part of it. It shouldn’t just feel like something that you’re going to use in a fundraising ask but. It’s also something that the staff is listening to when you’re working towards your mission and like creating operating values and all these things of having member voices. All right, so, um, after we’re, uh, conscious and reaching out to folks where they are, we, we see a potential, you see a potential story you mentioned maybe a Facebook post or something or some social post that is a potential story, uh, what’s where, where do we take from there? How, how do we how do we reach out to the person. Again, now from our perspective, sincerely nonexploitatively, but you know we think that there could be something there that would encourage others to to support. Yeah, that’s an interesting question partially because for the the work that I do specifically we work with so many different organizations and they all have a little bit of a different approach for this because their audiences are so different. I think a really common way we see it is people that are already on a list like a marketing list obviously if you have like a really big email list sending out and ask for stories is really helpful. I like to do anybody that’s already taken an action so donors are obviously great. I think giving money is like the highest bar action so even in like a donation receipt email that they receive, you can include an ask for storytelling there, whether it’s a Google for asking. For a written story or a link to something where they can upload a video or something like that. I think that’s a really good way to do it. Same thing with live events. If somebody is willing, especially in our day and age where everything is virtual, if somebody is willing to physically show up at an event for you, they’re for sure going to be willing to record a 20, 32nd story of something that they’re dealing with because they obviously have a deep value or attachment to your organization. In terms of like at the events you could ask them right there. We have a lot of people that do that, absolutely, and it helps just add like a little bit of fun to the event too like I don’t know, you go to a wedding and there’s like a goofy photo thing, you know, like people like to do that kind of stuff and it. There’s a lot of different ways you can do it. It doesn’t even have to be a video. It could just be a photo or something. Um, I think that too is like having a little bit of a user journey is often helpful. You don’t need to go from 0 to 100 right away. It doesn’t have to be like, we heard you have this issue, we want to get a 30 minute interview style story with you. It could be something like we would love for you to even like signing a petition, like, so you sign a petition first. If they sign the petition, you send them an ask for a written story. And then after they sign on a written story, you could even just send them back their written story and ask for a video. Um, that’s actually advice that I got from uh somebody named Felicia at Mom’s Rising. That’s the way that she does user journeys to get videos on soapbox and it’s been really effective for them. So it’s kind of like again meeting them where they’re at and then asking for like a little bit more every time um and getting them into something that they feel really comfortable with. Although the journalism part of me is like if you see a comment on Facebook of somebody saying something, I personally would reach out to them personally and ask them like just in a message or something, we saw that you wrote this, we’d really love for you to get involved and I think that’s a good way to do it. It’s not saying we need a story from you to use for this thing, but saying we would love for you to get involved um with our mission and it will help us in these ways are great strategies gave us like half a dozen. Methods of gathering story whether it’s an event, uh, you know, face to face, uh, or, uh, or virtual, um, other, uh, so this is, you know, I mean this is, I think this is the part where it it may break down like there’s we see potential but we don’t. Take advantage. We don’t, we don’t reach out to the person, not take advantage of the person. We don’t take advantage of the potential that’s there to, to support our mission, you know, we just kind of let it go or, you know, oh that that sounds interesting, and then we’re on to the next post or something, you know, or I’m glad that glad she said that, but then nothing more comes of it, um. So anything else at this at this stage that um yeah I mean I think storytelling has to be intentional like you’re saying, I think people will even like hear the things that I’m saying now and be like, well, maybe we’ll think about it or like it’s gonna take effort. It is something that you have to like consciously think about. It’s kind of like. I, to be honest, I think about this a lot like fundraising. If you, they say on average it takes 7 touch points before somebody will actually donate, it might take a couple of different touch points before somebody’s actually going to give you their story, but if we asked once for donations and they didn’t do it, no fundraiser would stop asking, right? Like you have to come up with other strategies to do it and once you come up with a strategy for storytelling that really works for your specific audience and your organization, it can really help make those asks a lot easier so it is worth the effort. Um, I do think though it shouldn’t feel storytelling shouldn’t feel like something that’s sort of parallel to the work that you’re doing, it really should feel integrated. It shouldn’t feel like, well, I really need a second staff person or something to be doing this. It should be something that feels really in line with the fundraising and the marketing strategy that you already have like for nonprofit to have a marketing strategy that doesn’t include storytelling, I think. a really big loss. Um, it should feel very integrated in that and if you’re doing it correctly, it shouldn’t feel like it’s like the work for 3 people. It should feel like it’s integrated into what you’re already doing. It’s part of the process see something that could be valuable. You talked about the journey, the content provider journey, you didn’t call it that, but uh. I don’t know why I’m using jargon. I have jargon tail on my own show, and I’m, you know, no, but it’s a journey for the person. They may not be a content creator. They are for you, but um. Yeah, no, it’s very like low lift in the beginning. Like it could just be a photograph we just use the post that you just quote the post that you just wrote something like that. You’ve already written it we use it on our website. Can we quote that in an email in a newsletter? That’s a really compelling story. We’d love to put that as a pull out quote in our next newsletter. People love that kind of stuff. Yeah. And people will feel special about it and then they might even share your newsletter on their own social media because they’ll be like, look, I’m quoted little vanity, yeah, we love to brag about ourselves, especially if we’re given a good opportunity. Look how we become validation personal validation now we’re the and there’s no humility on this podcast, um. OK, so now we’re at the right, so we’ve gathered some content. Some folks have said yes. Some said no, but that’s OK because like you said, we wouldn’t stop asking if it was fundraising. So we’ve got some, got some stories, different formats, um, suppose it’s just, well, you suppose it’s just a written story and, uh, we got their authority, their consent to use it in a newsletter. Anything more that we thank them. I just wanted these little mechanics. We thank them before we ask them if they take a further step like write a paragraph or something or a little fuller story. Any anything else we should be doing? Yeah, I think. Not to use the classic, it depends, but I think it does depend a little bit on like. It does kind of a little bit come down to capacity and volume like we have some partners that will be collecting hundreds if not thousands of videos at the same time. So it’s really difficult to be able to have a personal touch with like each of those individuals, right? Um, but I do think having like an auto triggered this is where tech comes in like having an auto triggered email that can go to every person that submits it saying thank you for the the video or the submission and also telling you, telling them what you’re gonna use it for. I think it’s really helpful. um I think a lot of nonprofits fall into abstract when they talk about use cases where they’re like we’re gonna use this for like tech justice or like. You know, fight this economic disparity, um, but that’s not really telling them what you’re actually going to use their story for and what it’s actually going to do and that kind of falls into that impact part is like now they feel like they’re submitting it to a black void that’s never gonna happen, um, so telling them like this is potentially going to be featured on our social media or embedded on our website like do something that’s actually going to tell them where to look for it. I think it’s often really helpful and deeply incentivizing for them to want to submit it and also potentially want to submit again in the future um and to share it, which is helpful. Um, but yeah, otherwise like we see a lot of people that will put stories on, yeah, like embedded on their website or like we work with a lot of member organizations if you’re looking for members, um, have members talk about what they like about your organization and embed a bunch of videos on your website under the membership page or take action page. um, yeah, otherwise. Mechanics, I guess it just it so depends on the on the people. I think if it’s a small group, like if you’re asking 5 volunteers, we have a lot of organizations that will do this even with just volunteers. They just have volunteers talk about different things and ask their friends to submit stories. If it’s like a group of just a few, I think even like a handwritten note thinking them or something would be amazing. I’m a big fan of handwritten notes. I think a handwritten note or like maybe a discount on like an event registration or something or a free event registration or something, a t-shirt, anything like that. I, I, I think it’s important to steer away a little bit from being like here’s compensation for recording a video because I do think once you compensate people will kind of say whatever you want them to say and it does affect the authenticity of it a bit. Um, but providing them a t-shirt with your logo on it, I think it’s a gratitude. It’s like some of these stories that we’re collecting are really personal about people’s use of Medicaid or gun violence or abortion care and so for people. to put themselves out there and really do that for you to be able to make a difference at your organization I think deserves a thank you in some way. And that’s how you’re building engagement, right? Like so you want them to be a donor in the future like you’re just building a relationship with them and they took a really big step so you should take at least a medium sized step to meet them. You got a good story, you can share? Um, let’s see. Yeah, we have, uh, I mean we have lots of places that are using it really effectively right now. I think I keep mentioning Medicaid because it’s so topical that we have 4 or 5 organizations right now doing save Medicaid campaigns um for advocacy purposes. Um, we work with the National Education Association, um, and they’ve been doing a lot of getting a lot of stories from educators about why public education is important, why the Department of Education is important, um, things like that which have been really great. Um, we worked with, trying to think of like volume over over quantity a little or like quantity over quality. Uh, we have some places that like I said, we’ll collect thousands of videos on our platform for something like Color of Change collected thousands of videos after George Floyd’s murder, um, on our platform, basically just saying that they like stand with the family and that things need to change, um, but then on the flip side of that, we have an amazing organization called. Community catalyst that they work on health justice and they’ve been getting a lot of really, really amazing stories about medical debt that have actually like done a lot to impact policy and we talked about personal stories. I mean, medical debt now you’re now you’re saying to the world that you’re suffering financial difficulties, things are challenging for you and that’s, that’s very personal. I mean, a lot of the stuff we’re talking about is we talk about abortion access and that’s also a deeply personal. Um, they specifically do a really good job of, I think you can use storytelling in a really tactful way to distill really difficult information or like policy, right? Like. We’re not, not all of us are really well informed about what certain policies will mean for us on a day to day basis or like for our family and community catalyst in particular I think does a really good job of taking like high level decisions and distilling it down to what it actually means on a human level through storytelling. They did a campaign about nonprofit hospitals and I had no idea like what the impact of nonprofit hospitals were before they did this campaign. Um, it’s something that almost everybody has in their community, but we’re not really aware of, um, so storytelling is a really powerful tool to be able to change those kinds of things. Um, have you done your session yet? I haven’t. You haven’t. It’s coming. OK. OK. I know I’m giving away all my tips. This is not gonna nobody listens to this podcast. Um, no, we have 13,000 listeners. That’s amazing. It’s good. It’s a, I’m grateful to have that many people listening each week. Um, otherwise, yeah, otherwise I would have asked you, uh, some of the questions that you got from the audience, but, um. So, uh, leave us with something that uh we haven’t talked about yet or maybe amplify something we did talk about, but you wanna go a little deeper. Um, with some encouragement. Leave us with something good. Yeah, um, I think a big reason why just like a little bit of my own story I guess like I went to school for journalism and a really big part of that was um making sure that voices are being heard that aren’t normally being heard by the mainstream media or just different things and I think in nonprofits it’s easy to target people that have like a really good story or um are already active or have a community following or things like that but I think some of the most impactful stories are the people who have tried to tell their story a lot of times and felt like it never has gotten heard and so they just stopped telling it. Um, that was a really big part of my sort of like journalistic career was um talking about the um so I’m like stumbling a little bit I just haven’t talked about this story in a minute but. Um, was talking about the healthcare access and like federal funding access on Native American reservations in rural Montana during COVID and they had like absolutely no belief that the federal government was going to be helpful um through IHS funding at that time and they there was no coverage in Montana about what was going on in those areas um through like funding. And it was a really big sort of like catalyst for me to be like I just want there to be a really accessible super easy way for people to not only tell their story but feel like that story is being heard um and like actually get used for something that could be impactful. So that’s sort of really like a big part of why our company is the way that it is now is just feeling like everybody has the same opportunity to tell their story in a meaningful way. Megan Castle, CEO of Soapbox, thanks very much for sharing all your ideas. Yeah, thanks Tony. It’s been. Thank you, my pleasure and thank you for being with Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of the 2025 nonprofit technology conference where we are sponsored by Heller Consulting. It’s time for Tony’s steak too. Thank you, Kate. I have to thank our long time listener and fan of nonprofit radio, Cheryl McCormick. She’s Been with us for many, many years. She’s CEO of the Athens Are Humane Society in Athens, Georgia. And she alerted me to a planned giving scam. That has been run in two charities in Canada. And the exact same thing, storywise and. Document wise happened at. The Athens Are Humane Society. What happens is they’re preying on small charities that would get excited by a $95,000 planned gift. And they promised to send you the check, and, but Cheryl and her team had some suspicion about the, the way the conversations were going and the strange email address was an AOL address, but the person was claiming to be an attorney. And there was no obituary for the person that they claimed had died. There was no will available. So these are the things that raised their suspicion. Uh, the, uh, $95,000 check did arrive. To the Humane Society, but Cheryl and her team had figured out the scam in advance because they found some news coverage of the exact same scam run against two charities in Canada. And I did a LinkedIn post, if you want to go back to my, look at my LinkedIn posts from last week, you’ll find a link to the news coverage of that, uh, that scam against the two Canadian charities. What is the scam? They send you the $95,000 check, then they tell you, oh, you made a terrible mistake. We sent you too much money. We need you to wire back 70 or $75,000. You were only supposed to get 20 or 25. You wire the money back. And after that, the $95,000 check bounces. And you are out the money that you wired them because they’re long gone. So Beware. Uh, it’s people preying on small charities, uh, who would get excited, you know, uh, well, any charity, I think would get excited by a $95,000 gift of any type, planned gift or, uh, lifetime, immediate gift. Take your time. Now you’re aware of this scam, but generally, Trust your intuition. Do your due diligence, research. If you’re not sure about something, don’t say yes. You know, you don’t have to urgently accept a gift. Of any type, whether it’s a lifetime gift or or planned gift. Take your time. Make sure you Do the research. Because there are some folks uh taking advantage of our community, which Boils my blood. It was miserable. We we’re gonna fucking. Scammers picking on our community. Damn you, damn you scammers. That is Tony’s take too. Kate. We hear that scammers would be going after small nonprofits and not like. Rich people, they can do both like Jeff Bezos or something like Amazon and yeah I think they’ve got enough, uh, Bezos, but uh you can do both. It’s not mutually exclusive. So, I want folks to be aware that there are people preying on nonprofits. My favorite scam is the one that dad got, your brother, he got in the, in the mail that. He was like some long lost relative of some prince overseas and he has to like claim money or something and he’s like royalty now. Yeah, yeah. I think he told me about that. He asked me, I think he asked me about that at the time. That was a few years ago. Yeah, I remember we’re we’re descended from royalty or something like that, yeah. Martin Etis. The Martignetti uh science, the uh the. The, the Duke and Duchess. Oh yeah. I, I would be the duke, your dad would be the duchess. Well, we’ve got boo but loads more time. Here are 5 common email marketing mistakes and how to fix them. Hello and welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio coverage of 25 NTC, the 2025 nonprofit Technology Conference. We’re all together in Baltimore, Maryland. Our 25 NTC coverage is sponsored by Heller Consulting technology services for nonprofits. With me now is uh 33 timer back on nonprofit radio, Patty Bree, founder and CEO of the Purpose Collective. Welcome back, Patty Breach. Thank you so much for having me. I’m pretty sure it’s, I think that sounds right, yeah, it is, um, and this year. Your NTC session is uh 5 email marketing mistakes you’re probably making and how to fix them. That’s right. Uh, I think you and I kicked off our uh NTC journey with, with the, uh. The the with with an email journey, your your your email welcome journey, isn’t that what it was called your journey, yeah, that’s right. I’m a little bit obsessed with. OK, yeah, that the previous session attributed the 55 email journey to you and you’ve got exact time frames and first one should look like it came from the CEO or what like it was personally prepared. Yes, we’ve been through that. Um, so, uh, the 5 email marketing mistakes, why don’t you just tick off the 5 and then we’ll be happy to go into detail. Go ahead. What are the 5 you’re probably making mistakes. Yeah, so the first mistake has to do with how you’re collecting emails for your list and that is the mistake that you’re probably making is that you’re just asking people to subscribe to your newsletter. Um, the second mistake is that after you convince someone to subscribe to your newsletter. Um, you do nothing. You answer that with silence. Even just one email would be great, but a lot of people don’t have that. OK. Um, the third mistake is that your your emails are trying to do everything. They’re just they’re way too full. And the 4th mistake is that your emails are talking about you not talking to me. And then the 5th mistake is that your emails are not coming from a person. OK. Uh, some of these sound familiar, like talking about you, you, you like, you like it donor centric, donor focused, not about us, the work, about you, the donor, but we’ll get to that. That’s number 4. I’m jumping ahead, but some, some of these sound familiar, including the, uh, how you’re welcoming the welcome series. OK, but let’s start with number one, how you’re, how you’re collecting what what what’s, what are we probably getting wrong there again? Yeah, so I think um most of us are probably just putting something really simple on our website that says subscribe to our newsletter or join our email list with a little box to put your email in and I argue that that’s not very compelling. Nobody really wakes up in the morning thinking I need some more newsletters today so uh I’m gonna go to this organization’s website to get my fix. I’m so glad they asked me to join an email list I was really hoping to do that today. Um, so I encourage organizations instead to invite people to be a part of a movement, um. You know, include a call to action that’s really inspiring. What is it that you’re offering people like is it that you’re gonna provide stories of hope in their inbox every day which all of us could use a little bit more hope in this day and age? Is it um that I mean politicians are really good at this if you go to their websites and see what their call to action is on their email newsletters, it’s things like you know we’re gonna. We’re gonna dream big, we’re gonna fight hard, we’re gonna put power back in the hands of the people, like really inspiring messages where you read that and you think, yeah, I wanna do that. Absolutely, sign me up. Um, what pop-ups, uh, light boxes, what do you feel about, are, are, are pop-ups and light boxes, are they antiquated? No, pop-ups are still, I think those are good. Can you, can you do those like, well, you said it for like 15 seconds on the site and then it pops up or how do you feel about those? if they’re not good then say, say you’re, I’m out of, I’m out of line. No, I think those are great um I think what you said is really important like wait a little bit before a lightbox shows up so you can either do that with a time delay or you can do it with scroll depth on the page depending on your website so I think something that’s annoying is when you go to a site and you’re trying to read. Whatever it is you came there to read and like almost immediately something’s in your face and you’re like I was trying to read that like get out of here. I came here for a 1015 seconds with the info that I wanted 15 seconds in the world of websites is actually a long time to spend on a page so if you’re delaying something that long, great, like at that point someone if they’ve been there for 15 seconds, they’re probably interested in you enough to sign up for your email. But you want to know what your average time on the. On the site is, I mean, if it’s, if it’s 8 seconds, that’s, that’s pretty bad actually. If people are, people are leaving your site after 8 seconds, that’s bad. Well, now you know what, it it depends on the reason they go though if they, if they, if it was a search and now, now that brings in the Google AI summaries that is that is now reducing organic, uh, organic hits right because we’re getting it from the AI summary we don’t even scroll past that, but if you get past that and people came with a specific question and you’ve got the answer. Um, they might only be 10 seconds. Yeah. Yeah. They might only be 8 seconds on your home page and then click through to a different page. Um, so yeah, I think, I think lightboxes are great. I would just make sure they’re not immediately in your face. OK, OK. Um, right, so you wanna, you’re trying to draw people into your work in inducing them to join you, so not just get a, get a get a weekly. Yeah, you’re inviting them to be part of something bigger than themselves, joining a movement, solving a problem, being a part of the solution, being inspired, that’s really the call to action that I want every nonprofit to have on their website for their email newsletters. I have a good friend. Credit her because I’m gonna use her material, uh, Sherry Quam Taylor. Uh, we spent a lot of time together on LinkedIn. And she says that her advice is that you’re not giving. To us, you’re giving to the cause through us, so it’s 2 versus through. You’re giving to. Uh, solving world hunger through Feeding America or you know, um, etc. you know, do you, do you buy into that or you’re welcome to agree with Sherry disagree or disagree I should say. No, I definitely agree. Yeah, I think that’s that’s totally right. One of the examples I use in the presentation is a. The action that says let’s end malaria. It’s from an organization that’s working and you know it says like we believe this is possible. Join us. Like we’re we’re going to get rid of this disease. Let’s do it. And so the people who are signing up for that email list and donating to that organization. They’re trying to get rid of malaria. They’re like, Oh, is that what you guys are doing? I don’t know who you are. I want to get rid of malaria, you know, that’s the one thing I’ll join your list because, yeah, no, no, absolutely, alright, something bigger, right, something big, the bigger cause. Yeah, right, right, that’s the sort of inducing, uh. An opening relationship, you know, hear from us regularly. OK. OK. Um, so how are you welcoming? Uh, here we are now. 5 email, the, uh, the ubiquitous Patty Breach, uh, purpose collective 5 email welcome journey. Is that, is that what this is? How are you welcoming folks after the first one? I’m sorry, after they say yes, I will, I will, I’ll take your email. Your, I’ll take your newsletter, sorry, yes, I’ll join your newsletter. What should happen first thing. Yeah, so what I like to point out to people is that the journey that it took for someone to give you their email address, that didn’t happen in a minute. They probably, you know, first heard about you through word of mouth or some other means and so they maybe spent some time poking around in your social media. They liked what they saw, so maybe they ended up on your YouTube channel watching some longer form videos, maybe they popped over to your website, read even more about you, looked at your blog, and then decided. Yeah, I like this organization. I like what they’re doing. I wanna be a part of it. Here you can have my email address so that process that might have been days, hours, it was like by the time they give you their email address they are fired up about you. They’re like, yes, I’m in, sign me up, let’s do this let’s end malaria or whatever it is and if we’re not meeting that enthusiasm with our own excitement then it’s a really missed opportunity. So I recommend sending at least one email that just says yay, you’re here, you made a good decision, welcome. OK, OK, uh, that’s at least 1. Let’s let’s review the uh the 5 email welcome journey. You we we’re not gonna go into the 35 minutes that we spent, uh, 2 years ago, uh, no, 3, no 2 years ago. Yeah, this is the 3rd. Um, but you know, remind us what the, what this ubiquitous journey looks like. Yeah, so the idea is to capitalize on the window of opportunity immediately following someone’s action. So I recommend sending 3 to 5 emails starting as close to immediately as possible, so at least within the 1st 24 hours after this action. And going up to 3 or 4 weeks later. So, um. You can send as as many or as few as you like in that window depending on your team’s capacity depending on what you feel like you have to say um but I recommend starting with something simple that’s like congratulations we’re so glad you’re here you made a good decision, welcome to the team, yay um and then from there you can go into um more content that. Talks more about what it is that you do broadly, but we always want to make sure we’re giving someone something of value, so saying like. Um, here’s our most popular piece of content that we put out in the last year. We thought you might like it. Everyone else told us it was really great. Have you seen it? Have you seen this video? I’ve read this blog post, um, you can invite people to come hang out with you if that’s appropriate, like, hey, we have events we’d love to see you at one of them. We have volunteer opportunities we love to meet you, um, something that’s like really drawing them in to the work and making them feel like they’re an important part of what you do. And if you want, you can throw in a donation ask as one of those emails as well. So the, the second one, not certainly not the first one, no ask in the first one that I have your attention, can I have your money? Alright, so 2 or 3 you could put it in. OK. It could be, it could be a different ask too. It could be a volunteer ask, could be a sign, uh, a petition is a ubiquitous one. Survey, maybe you have a survey about your interests that are all valid calls to action, right? Absolutely, yeah, and they’re like I said, they’re very fired up about you at this point, so it’s an excellent time to ask them for something like this. And the second one initially joined 2 to 3 days after that initial action and the first one came within 24 hours. OK. OK, why don’t we suppose we’re we have the capacity for a 555 step. what are we doing in 4 and 5? Yeah, so, um, I would say that the time between emails should basically start doubling so you wanna have one email immediately, a couple days later another 15 days later another one, a week later, another 12 weeks later, the last one. Um, and I think you can’t tell too many stories in these email welcome journeys, so I like to do, um, you know, a simple welcome message for the first one, tell a story of impact meaning here’s the story of lives that are being changed thanks to supporters like you, like this is what the work that you’re making possible now that you’re part of this community. Third email can be some call to action like volunteer with us, come to our events, take our survey, make a donation, whatever it might be. 4th email tell another story, and then that 5th email it could be another call to action like we want you to read this, we want you to watch this video, we want you to donate if you haven’t asked that yet, whatever it might be. OK, thank you. Good overview of the welcome journey. All right, that’s how you should be welcome, but your advice was at least 1. That’s not just the regular newsletter, at least one personalized thank you, yeah, you’re with us. Thanks so much. Yeah, exactly. I mean it can be overwhelming to think about creating a 5 part series, so maybe just start with one, just at least get that going. OK, um, your emails are too full, too much, too dense. What, what does this look like? What’s, what, what are we probably getting wrong here? So, um, it sounds like you could have called this most likely like 90% chance that you’re getting these wrong instead of probably, but you’re being, you’re being thoughtful to to the community. You’re probably getting this wrong, but overwhelmingly likely. All right, what, what’s the matter with our, our dense emails? Yeah, so one of my mentors describes marketing communications as like throwing ping pong balls at people and so if I were to throw 72 ping pong balls at you at once, you might just like cower in fear like what is happening? You probably can’t like focus on catching one of those, um, and I think a lot of times that’s what our. Emails end up being like in the nonprofit world it’s just information overload it’s just this this this this this this this and this and it’s like whoa this is like too much I I don’t know what’s going on in this message and a lot of times also I think they fall into this category that I like to call the phone call to mom which is if you could imagine. You know, a mother figure in your life calling you and saying like, hey, how are you? What did you do today? What did you do yesterday? What did you have for dinner? Where are you going tomorrow? This is a phone call from mom, that’s a better way to describe it. Yeah, but I think it’s better if the rare as that is, we know mothers never pick up the phone. No mother’s phones outgoing calls. They only they only receive calls. Uh, but if you know, but the, the phone call from hell or the phone call from mom. OK. Um. So that type of reporting. Of like this is what our nonprofit has been doing we bought new computers our CEO won an award that is only interesting to your mom. No one else wants to hear those kinds of updates so um I really challenge nonprofits to look hard at what they’re putting in their email newsletters and see if they can cut it down to just things that are relevant to their supporters like a story of impact could be relevant. And saying like you know here’s this wonderful uplifting story that we wanted to share with you it’s so heartwarming, it’s so inspiring and you’re a part of this work with us so thank you for being here and also you know inviting people to come to an event sharing a resource that might be helpful to them. That’s the type of content that I’d like to see more of in these newsletters, and it could be really simple just three pieces of information in an email. You could even just do one. You could have a newsletter where you send one topic, one story. You can do that. OK, yeah, your supporters don’t need to know everything, right? Like you serve a rack. We moved the server rack, uh, out of the ladies’ room. Now the devoted server closet. Thank you for your support. Alright, uh, yeah, see, the audience likes our idea. That’s the, uh, keynote keynote session going on in the background, but we persevere. Um, OK, yeah, so take a deep edit to your, your bloated emails like, so is it. All right, so some info just doesn’t need to be shared, like the, the, the new laptops and the server rack. That doesn’t need to be shared. But if, if, if we feel the information is relevant. Are you saying it’s better to maybe send more frequent emails that are less dense? Exactly, yeah. So if you’re an organization that is frequently updating your constituents, maybe you have a lot of events, maybe you have a lot of free resources there’s a lot going on. I would recommend sending more emails that are shorter. OK, what’s the maximum and maybe there isn’t a hard rule uh maximum number of emails. Let, let’s not even say a week. I mean, in a month. How many, how, how many would be too many, thank you, in a month. Um, that’s a good question. I don’t know that there is a hard and fast rule. You could go weekly, so that would be 4 in a month. Um, you could send 2 a week if you have a lot to say, if there’s a lot to update your supporters on. I wouldn’t do 2 a week if you’re just repeating the same content across those emails. Um, you might get people starting to to tune out, but if there’s a lot going on, yeah, weekly emails I think. All good. What’s your advice on uh resending to non-openers? Um, yeah, great question. That I think um it’s about time. It’s only 18.5 minutes in. You got a decent question. All right. That can be a good strategy, um, that has more to do with your Deliverability like getting people to interact more with your messages, um. My answer to that also I think would depend on like what is the bandwidth of your team’s capabilities and if getting the newsletter out the door is already a lot of work and it doesn’t really feel possible to go back and resend to not like that’s just too much on top of everything then I think you can skip it. OK, I mean, I, I think it’s an auto like just click click a button. Depending on your email provider, yeah, it can be. I use MailChimp. I know it’s, it’s an option. Just tap the button and then they’ll ask when do you, you know, when do you want to resend? OK. Uh, all right, so you’re not opposed to the idea. No, not opposed. OK, all right. Um, but you’re not enthusiastic about it either. Yeah, I mean, I guess. I have mixed feelings on it because I think that. I think that sometimes we can get a little fixated on the people who are not opening our emails, people who are unsubscribing. I hear this a lot from nonprofits they get. Um, they’re hurt by the people who are unsubscribing from their email list like why are these people leaving like look at all these people who don’t want to hear from us anymore like this is hurting our feelings, um, and I really want our attention and energy to go to the people who are opening your emails and are engaging with it like those are your supporters who are happy to hear from you. They’re excited about what you’re doing. And the other people who don’t want to read your messages, don’t wanna open them, don’t wanna be on your list, that’s fine, let them do whatever they want. Let’s focus on the people who are excited. OK, all right, very positive. The positive purpose collective, um, I guess the other thing you could do is look at how the resend does. If it’s very low, then you, then you’re just annoying people a second time. But if it, I don’t know if it does like 20, 20% or more. Of the the non-opener, now we’re now the population is the non-openers of the first one. I don’t know if it does 20% or more. That’s that worthwhile? Yeah it was probably worth sending, but it’s like 2 or 3%, people are, you know, they’re blowing you off a second time. Don’t resend again. I don’t know. How about this thing. 6 months later you’re getting the same email you got. All right, don’t do that. That’s another one you’re definitely doing wrong. If you’re doing that, you’re, that’s definitely a mistake. OK. Um, all right, so that do we cover email density, there’s almost only so much capacity in. Could be just 12 or 3 if you feel it’s necessary, but certainly no more than 3. And same thing with calls to action, right? Are you, you’re you’re a subscriber, I think or believer one call to action per message, right? Yeah, yeah, keep it simple. Um, click rates are, I mean, famously low across email. A good click, an amazing click rate would be 10%, meaning 90% of people are not gonna click on your email. And so I think we can do ourselves a favor by making that one click really count and just have the one call to action. So rather than saying you know you could do this or that or this or that like sometimes that creates decision fatigue and people choose nothing or not even just 2, not even 2 choices. I mean you could, you could definitely do too like um something that’s common is to include a donate button in the footer of every newsletter so maybe your call to action in the body is something different like. You want people to register for an event. That’s your main call to action. I think it’s fine to keep that other donate link in the in the in the body, keep it to one or QR code you like QR codes. Um, yeah, I love QR codes. I don’t know how often QR codes are effective in emails. Sometimes you’re on your phone that’s right. Most emails are opened by phone, right? It’s a very high percentage. Yeah, very true. OK. Right, those are more for social website. Yeah, or paper, you know, if you have like a poster somewhere, if you’re handing out a flyer QR code is a great way to get someone online really quickly. Yeah, you’re absolutely right. The vast majority of emails are on the phone, so you’re welcome to say no. Uh, talking, talking the subject matter, that the pronouns are wrong. Too much us and we and not enough you and us together. All right, expand on your, your thinking there. There’s the team. Here’s the team together. Purpose Collective, all three. Julia and Michelle just joined, uh, watching, watching the CEO. All right, you’re getting content. All right. Digital content. Don’t put too much in those emails though. Don’t fill those emails. All right. I told them, I told them in the previous, I’ll probably run these back to back week one will be probably be them with panel of three with uh, with, uh, Michelle Julia and, um, and Sarah from Brack, um, and then, and then this, this will probably be, will probably follow. I told them. Uh, you’re overexposed. The purpose is overexposed. Like every year now we got 100% of the team is on two different sessions. Next year it’ll be 4 people and you’ll want to bring them all in one sessions, yeah, so you need to sponsor. What you need to do is start sponsoring the podcast. That’s what. That’s what should be, says sponsored by Heller Consulting should be sponsored by the Purpose collector. So put that in the budget for for 2026, or even a spot opening, uh, even this summer. So you don’t have to wait you have to wait till next year. All right, so all three of you have heard it now. Yes, you do. All right, um. we’re we’re looking I think is what we’re probably doing wrong. So you might have heard me say this before. I believe the most important word you can use in any of your marketing is the word you and it’s really understandable how we end up talking too much about ourselves too much we focused language. Um, it makes perfect sense. We, we wanna show our supporters that we’re doing a good job. We wanna. Make a strong case for why our organization matters um we wanna prove that we’re doing what we said we would do with your donations um but unfortunately that can come across as um I mean one it can make it seem like we don’t need any support because look at us, look how great we’re doing we did this and we did that. Um, but the other thing is it doesn’t really invite the reader in to say you have a place here and you’re a part of this. It’s just, I mean it comes across as bragging like look at us, look at what we did, we did this and we did that and we did this other thing and now we’re doing this and we also did that. Aren’t we great? And so it’s a simple shift to just use more you focused language. So you know thanks to your support we’re able to do this um you’re changing lives, you’re helping to make the world a better place, um. I like it that you’re doing the work, not that you’re supporting us in doing the work because they all know that they know they’re not on the ground. They know they’re not visiting the homeless camps. They realize that they don’t do that. They know, but you can see it’s not like lying, you know, you’re, you’re, you’re saving lives, you know, whatever you’re improving the climate in Detroit. You know, it’s it, you don’t have to use the, you know, where you’re helping us do it. Yeah, exactly. And also you know just more gratitude when you when you add more language you end up with more gratitude statements like thank you so much for being someone who cares so deeply about this thank you for for making meaningful steps towards this goal thank you um I think that can really help your emails feel like. They’re relevant to the reader. It’s not just me talking about myself at this organization, it’s me saying to you, you matter, you’re a part of this, you’re really important, couldn’t do it without you. OK, OK. Um, email is not coming from a person. Yeah, so, um, I see this a lot where an organization will put the nonprofit name in the center line and the subject line will say something like spring 2025 newsletter and that just feels very corporate feels very one size fits all it feels like you know we’re just this. Nameless faceless organization that’s sending you an update. I think it’s much better to remind people that they’re humans who work at your organization, so put that, put a person’s name in the center line. You can still include the organization after that name if you want to. Um, but say you know this is from Patty Breach and sign the email as if it was from me, Patty Reach include my photo, you know, put something in there that shows people there are real human beings doing this work and we those real human beings, we want to talk to you are very important supporter and we want to send this message to you from us. Um, I think that personal touch can really help people feel more connected to the work that you’re doing, feel more connected to your team, and in the presentation I I include a screenshot that I pulled from my own inbox a few days ago where it’s just like corporate message after corporate message it’s like a receipt from the parking structure where I left my car to come on this trip and it’s like Toyota sent me. An email and Verizon sends me an email. It’s just like we’re so used to getting these meaningless corporate emails from companies. So if you put a person’s name in the center line, I think you’ll really stand out in the average inbox. I’m sorry, the line. Yes, yes. OK. OK. Yeah, right, right, yeah, Tony Martignetti. I do that. OK, good. I got 1 out of 5. Uh, no, this is not about me. Uh, all right, valuable, yeah, yeah, it’s, it’s the person and then you could say like CEO. I mean I’d be more apt to open a CEO’s email than, you know, if I get maybe I wouldn’t say director of development. I’d probably just leave that out. But yeah, a person, right, that’s a simple one. That’s a simple one. How do you feel about the uh yeah, using the name, you know, like addressing, you know, hello, hello Patty or you know, hey Patty or something like that I think it’s a really good idea, you know, you know, you know, the person didn’t write it personally, safe bet, you know, unless, but hey Patty, you know, hi Patty, you know, you’re into those dear, dear, yeah, yeah, great. OK. Even just even just first name yeah um Seth Godin says that what our supporters want most is to be seen and so to use someone’s name is one way you can say like I see you I remember you, I know who you are glad you’re here. Yeah, right, and now it’s person to person if the sender is a person and uh they’re saying hello yes exactly. How do you feel about uh leaving it there with personalization? That’s great. Is that right? Yeah, OK. Patty breach spelled like uh spelled like breech birth, not like breach, not like breach of contract breach, yes. Founder and CEO of the Purpose Collective. 5 email marketing mistakes you’re probably making and how to fix them. That’s what we just talked about and we are sponsored here by Heller Consulting. Technology services for nonprofits. Um, thank you very much for being with our 25 NTC coverage. Next week. Congrats, you’re a manager. Now what? And facing feedback. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Marignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.