Dr. Jill Baron walks us through her four cornerstones for minimizing stress and maximizing wellness in the New Year: diet, meditation, walking (or other exercise), and sleep. Plus, your mental and emotional resilience. She’s our first medical doctor guest, and her book is “Don’t Mess With Stress.”
Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
Gene Takagi & Amy Sample Ward: Looking To 2025: Is It Paranoia Or Prudence?
Our esteemed contributors share what they’re looking to next year, with the uncertainty of a new president and administration. On the table is HR 9495, which some call the NonprofitKiller; government agencies no longer given deference by the federal courts, with the Supreme Court overruling the long-standing Chevron Doctrine; and, uneasiness around the economy rippling out to preemptive nonprofit budget cuts. Our legal contributor is Gene Takagi at NEO Law Group. Amy Sample Ward, CEO of NTEN, is our technology contributor.
Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite abdominal podcast. This is our last show of the year. I’ll have more to say about that. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d bear the pain of a para nia if you pointed out to me that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate with what’s up this week? Hey, Tony, we have looking to 2025. Is it paranoia or Prudence? Our esteemed contributors share what they’re looking to next year with the uncertainty of a new president and administration on the table is hr 9495, which some call the nonprofit killer government agencies no longer given deference by the federal courts with the Supreme Court overruling of the long-standing Chevron doctrine and uneasiness around the economy rippling out to pre-emptive nonprofit budget cuts. Our legal contributor is Gene Takaki at Neo Law Group, Amy Sample Ward CEO of N 10 is our technology contributor on Tony’s two. Our last show of the year and timely holiday wishes were sponsored by donor box outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor. Box.org here is looking to 2025. Is it paranoia or Prudence? It’s a pleasure to welcome back Gene Takagi and Amy Sample Ward for our final show of 2024. Gene is our legal contributor and principal of Neo, the nonprofit and exempt organization’s Law Group in San Francisco. He edits the wildly popular nonprofit law blog.com and is a part time lecturer at Columbia University. The firm is at Neola group.com and he’s at GTC A AMP award, our technology contributor and CEO of N 10. They were awarded a 2023 Bosch Foundation fellowship and their most recent co-authored book is the tech that comes next about equity and inclusiveness in technology development. They’re at Amy Sample ward.org and at Amy RS Ward Gene and Amy. Thank you for your contributions through the year and welcome to the final show of 2024. We made it sounds like drudgery. No, I’m just saying like it, you know, here we are, we made it all the way to the end of 2020 four. All right, thanks. OK. She says it, they say it with a smile. So thank you. Thank you. It sounded like uh it might have been a laborious chore, but no, hopefully not. I’m I’m sure not. All right. And one thing maybe Tony that, that will spur talking about what we might foresee in the future is that change in social media handles. As many of us are migrating to blue sky and to other. Exactly. But just thought, I chime in with that quickly, we can, we can talk about the, the, the seasonal migration. I, I am slow to adopt new networks. But uh yes, I, I’ve started being active on uh on blue sky as well. Indeed. All right. Uh We wanna start with something that, uh, both of you have seen me post about and has been getting a lot of attention, uh, for months before I joined, before this, uh, came within my ken if you will, uh, which is ho House Resolution hr 9495. Uh, in the Senate. It is, uh, 4136. It is the stop terror financing and tax penalties on American Hostages Act. Uh, J uh, I don’t know, terror financing and not penalizing people who were held hostage for paying their taxes late. I mean, those, those both sound like very worthwhile endeavors for the government to do. Uh, especially I’m thinking of hostages who may not have filed their 1040 on time. I mean, I think, I think being held hostage is, uh, uh, a legitimate reason for not having paid your taxes and then the penalties that would have ensued on top of that. So, II, I think that’s a fair, uh, but it’s the, uh, it’s the stop terror financing part that is, uh, rankling nonprofit organizations, the nonprofit community generally. Um, what, what is it about this house resolution? It passed the house. It’s now in the Senate, I guess I’ll just set up the, the, the, the, uh, timing of the thing. So, uh, it’s unlikely to be taken up in the current Senate. I mean, it’s possible but it’s not likely, uh, having passed the house. Uh, but we have a new Senate, uh, beginning on, um, January 3rd and, uh, that Senate could very well take up hr 9495 Senate 4136. What’s, uh, what, what’s the, uh, what’s the issue here for the nonprofit community? Gene? So, II, I think when we take a look at the name of the bill, this is the game of politics that some of us get frustrated with. Right. So who could be against stop terror financing? Of course, nobody wants to, it’s worthy and it’s worthy and benign. But what does it actually say about how we stop terror financing? What are the checks and balances? Can anybody just say you are supporting terror and that’s it. You are like, shut down. Do you get executed for doing that? I mean, so we, we need to look into the bill and I think the first time this bill came across was actually, um, late last year, Tony, it was under a different name. Uh, it was hr 64 08 in the house and it passed 382 to 11. So I don’t think a lot of the legislators got past the name of the bill and then they decided, hey, we’re going to pass this because how can our constituents see us oppose a bill against supporting terror? Of course, we are, are for, you know, stopping terror financing and the hostages too. Don’t forget the, the, the late, the late filings for the, for the hostages. And that’s the other part of politics, right? Is we bundle things together so that you’re trapped, right? There’s no kiss to, to, to promoting that bill. But here’s, here’s why it’s, it’s scary for, for the nonprofit sector. The addition in the bill, the, the part that’s not to do with hostages is about the Secretary of the Treasury having the discretion alone to strip the tax exempt status of an organization because they feel like they are supporting a terrorist organization, they are providing material support or resources to a terrorist organization. And if they deem that to be the case, they give 90 days notice to the organization, they should supply some evidence of that support um, or resources unless it’s a national secret or it’s not in the best interests of the government to do so. In which case, it could all be done in secret. It could just be, we’re taking away your 501 C three status because we’ve decided that you are supporting terror a terrorist organization, give us 90 days to prove that you’re not in return any money that, that, you know, you sent out to the terrorist organization that we might not really tell you much about. Um, and what is all of that mean? I mean, so now as we sort of dig into how this might be impacted and how, uh, an executive branch might use this particular bill to attack organizations or even if they don’t use it broadly how it will just chill free speech across the sector. There’s already organizations terrified with this bill and afraid to speak up on things like, um, the Palestinian people in Gaza, which is sort of what prompted the bill in the first place. Right. But, you know, now they’re thinking, oh my gosh, can we speak about reproductive rights? Can we speak about other things? Are we going to be called a terrorist organization or a supporter of a terrorist organization? And what if the organization we were supporting wasn’t branded a terrorist organization at the time, but later was declared by some other entity or some other agency to be a terrorist organization. Now, do they go back and do they ding us on that as well? And I won’t go too far down the line. But humanitarian aid is another huge issue to, to talk about later. But let me, let me stop there. Well, even even on the domestic side, suppose you are supporting the, uh, the civil rights or the legal rights of people who protest openly in the streets, uh, about anything that, that we have a right to seek redress from our, from our federal government around. So you’re, then those protesters are perhaps arrested, um, and charged and you give legal support, you give material legal support to those, to those charged. Are, are those, are those folks deemed domestic terrorists? That’s another thing, the bill does not distinguish between federal or domestic, sorry, between domestic or foreign. Uh, are you now giving material support to domestic terrorists who were exercising their first amendment rights of assembly and speech in the streets? And so now you’re, now you, this legal aid society are a, uh, terrorist supporting organization. So there’s an opportunity. Um, it’s just the, the, the bill is vague on standards. In fact, I think it’s, it’s silent on the standards for being deemed a terrorist supporting organization. It’s, it’s at the Secretary of the Treasury’s uh discretion, what is deemed a terrorist supporting organization? And that vagueness is critical. I don’t want to overstate it, Tony, because I’ve seen on various other podcasts. People are making more into this bill than is actually there. So to be a terrorist supporting organization that could be subject to being stripped of tax exempt status. You have to be accused, uh, or, or charged with, um, the designation that you are supporting a terrorist organization. And the terrorist organization is defined in other sections of the bill, the bill is very hard to read because it starts to refer to other places in the code where you could be described as a terrorist organization. So if you give support, material support or resources to that terrorist organization that’s typically been defined by somebody else, some other branch of the government, um, usually with a little bit more, you know, some people have been mistaken about this saying that the legislature had to define you as a terrorist organization. That’s not quite true. There are other sort of members of the executive branch that could still define you as a terrorist organization. If they have, then the secretary of the Treasury has the ability to say you supported them, but they’ve got to be on some list of a terrorist organization. So protesters on the street, if you’re supporting them in their legal aid, unless they are deemed part of a terrorist group that’s been identified as a terrorist organization, then that won’t apply. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money but also supports you in retaining your donors, a partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location. So you can grow your impact faster. That’s donor box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers, just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability. Your organization needs helping you, help others visit donor box.org to learn more. Now, back to looking to 2025 is it paranoia or prudence? Suppose they’re supporting Black Lives Matter in their local city and Black Lives Matter has been deemed a terrorist support, a terrorist organization. I mean, we, we, uh, by some, by some other agency as you’re, as you’re describing, that doesn’t seem outside the realm of possibility. The, the claim could be that Black Lives Matter members as if there’s as if there’s like a, a strict membership list or something. But let’s just use the, the worst possible instincts of uh the federal government uh are, are, you know, they, uh they, they uh they create crime in mayhem and they burn buildings. Well, it sounds like a domestic terror organization to us that other agency has determined. And now the, the uh the legal aid society uh is providing uh material support to a terrorist organization. Doesn’t that, isn’t that within the realm of possibility and plausibility? It kind of is Tony, it’s not really kind of projected right now that this is going to be focused on domestic terrorism. It seems like the executive branch doesn’t actually want to identify domestic organizations as terrorist organizations because many of them support the, the, the current administration, uh those who, who were responsible for the insurrection, for example, on January 6th. So the focus here right now is on foreign terrorism. That’s sort of the identified groups, um, that, um, if you support foreign terrorist organizations that seems to be the focus but it doesn’t mean that they couldn’t go down the route that you’re talking about. Terror. Does the, does the bill? I thought the bill was silent on foreign versus domestic terror. It doesn’t define it except through references to other sections of the code which are focused on foreign terrorist organizations. So, you know, it doesn’t mean they can’t expand it. It doesn’t mean that maybe the Secretary of the Treasury couldn’t interpret terrorist supporting to, to give themselves a little bit more power to say, hey, this is a terrorist group as well. But I, I think that would be something that, that would not be, I, there’s, there’s lots of law already where the executive branch can do far worse than under what they have in 9495. So the first thing to know is 9495 takes away tax exempt status. It does not stop you from operating, it just takes away 501 c three status or 5014 C four, whatever. But doesn’t stop you from operating, they have tools that can stop you from operating. They can criminalize you if they say you’re terror supporting same words, terrorist supporting. There are other laws which is why we go, well, why this law, why did this law come up? There’s already other laws that prevent you from supporting terror and the reason in my mind is they’re going to use this not as the hammer but as the chisel to silence dissent. So they’re gonna chisel away at certain organizations scare everybody else at it. And that’s, that’s gonna be the impact. So rather than like take down all these protesters or like a whole movement of civil rights organizers think they’re going, what they’re going to do is they’re going to the target. Why this bill came about was because of what’s happening in Palestine and Gaza and the support that um some of those organizations have given to the Palestinian cause they’re gonna use that and they’re gonna scare everybody else from, from speaking out on it. And I think that is the danger, the real danger of 9495 because there are other laws where they can strip away your 501 C three status for acting against public policy. There are other laws that say, hey, we can criminalize your leaders for supporting terror. There’s a whole bunch of worse things they can do. This is the lighter touch, which is a terrible light touch, but this is the lighter touch that might be more useful to an administration that wants to attack dissent, prior restraint on speech, self censorship, correct. Amy. What, what are you, what are you thinking? Yeah, I think that we’ve seen a lot of organizations feeling concerned about this. Um Actually for Gene’s point, not necessarily for the, you know, your organization is or eradicated and no longer exists. But what does this mean for how organizations position themselves, talk to their community, who they talk to, you know, the, the feeling that this is kind of um chilling the sector on building power and trying to work together. Versus um as jean said, there’s, there’s already options that if, you know, the government wanted to completely remove an organization, there are already ways that they could do that. Um But this feels both the, the timing where it’s come from, you know, how, how it came in response to organizations really trying to make more visible conversations about um Palestine, even not about Palestine, but even just organizations trying to say, you know, our, our government is complicit in so many harms around the world. Um And that, what does that mean for nonprofit organizations who felt like that is maybe not their explicit mission? Like to your example before they’re not a legal aid organization, they’re not a humanitarian aid organization, but they wanted to be um in the conversation with their community and acknowledging that there’s a lot going on in the world and even trying to acknowledge that maybe feels like it’s risky for them or what does it mean to be in a partnership with a lot of other organizations? Again, even on a different topic? But what does that association mean? And, and are we not able to collaborate across the sector because of perceptions, you know, gene, anything more we wanna say about uh 9495. Maybe, actually, instead of the substance, maybe some things that some of the organizations that are speaking out against the Bill Council on foundations, uh independent sector, the National Council on nonprofits. Those three and one other organization have a joint statement against the Bill. The advice that I’ve seen a lot is contact your senators. Thanks Tony. It’s since it’s passed the house, I think that’s sort of where the immediate fight is, is with the Senate. And um even if the the majority of the Senate changes, um uh next year, as you, as you noted, Tony, um there are, you know, possibilities of a filibuster by the democratic senators if they so feel like this is something that they can stand up on again again, the rhetoric and the naming of the bill. Um and how much constituents are paying attention to the actual details. I know a lot of nonprofit folks are, but, you know, the general population may not be looking past the title of the bill. And so if their representative is saying I’m voting against this when the exact same bill was there before with like a 95 or 97% vote for it, trying to, to explain that um might be hard. So while there’s hope for, you know, for some that the Senate uh might have a filibuster and not approve this, um or listen to the public if there’s enough of an uproar um across party lines, um, that, that, that maybe they don’t do it. So the, the immediate thing is yes, advocate against the bill. The second thing is make sure you’re informed about what this bill does and doesn’t, again, really a lot of misinformation out there right now and people are scrambling, they’re like trying to create subsidiaries, they’re trying to create LLC S to throw, you know, assets in just in case they lose their 501 C three status because they’re thinking that this bill will shut them down completely. Uh Again, not just lose 501 C three status and prevent them from operating, freeze their assets. That’s not what this bill does. Again, there’s other tools that, that the federal government or even state government already have that can do that, but they haven’t used it in the past. So it’s hard to say Tony, we, we may be in for New Times and really just egregious uses of these, these laws. Um but it may be premature to make huge decisions unless you’re really well informed about them. So I, I would say for, for people looking at this bill, don’t just listen to all the sort of the talk that’s out there right now, like sit down and really get well informed about this, listen to nonprofit radio because we will thank you because we will continue talking about it. Of course. Yeah. All right. Um, good, thank you. Context, context understanding. Let’s talk about, uh, something else that’s on your mind for, uh, watching in 2025 something that came out many months ago. Uh, Gene, which was the, uh, overruling of what, what’s commonly called the, the Chevron Doctrine where government agencies get a lot of deference in the courts when the issue is interpretation of regulations, uh, rules, uh, that, that doctrine of, of deference to those government experts uh was overruled by the Supreme Court was the middle of this year or so. Can you uh explain why this is concerning? Yeah, so it doesn’t, it’s kind of this sort of lawyer geeky thing that goes on, but it’s, it’s important to take a step back and say, hey, the legislator makes statutory laws, right? But the laws are full of like empty spaces for there to be, there needs to be regulation about how to implement these laws. And so like the different agencies including like the Treasury Department and the IRS um start to make regulations. Um and these regulations interpret the law in ways to enforce the law in a practical way. And it’s a lot of law uh and agencies like the EPA the Environmental Protection Agency will take kind of the meaning of the law and sort of all of the legislative history behind it and try to create regulations. They put out the regulations for notice and public comment and then they draft final regulations after that, taking into account those comments, hopefully taking those into account. The courts feel like these regulatory agencies use scientists like the EPA or, or experts, policy experts in creating these regulations. Um And now when a company like Chevron wants to sue uh and say these regulations are unfair, the court used to have to defer or provided deference under the Chevron deference doctrine that hey, we are going to defer to the expertise of the agencies when they created those regulations. And that’s why that is the deference. You have to prove to us if you’re the company saying, hey, no, this doesn’t really pollute or this doesn’t really affect our public health. Let’s let’s like con continue to produce this stuff um because we need it for other things. Um So now this deference is lost. So the courts can’t give deference and now they have to just weigh everything out in balance. The courts are not scientists, right? They’re not scientific experts, the scientific experts were consulted with in creating the regulations, which is why you defer to them. Now, we’ve lost that. So this is a big thing. Another reason why people were very concerned about the composition of the Supreme Court because there seems to be more or or less deference to kind of what, what public agencies see and more susceptibility to what corporations and people of wealth have, who can actually fight these and go to court all the way to the Supreme Court because they have a huge litigation war chest to work behind. It’s time for Tony’s take two. Thank you, Kate. Here we are. End of December. It’s the last show of 2024. It, it, I don’t know, it doesn’t creep up. It just, it just comes fast. I think end of the year, I hope your end of the year fundraising all important is, uh going well. Hope you have a bang up last couple of weeks of the year. I hope you get where you need to be fundraising wise. And then I hope you can take time off for family friends and yourself, you need rest. Here comes the finger wag. Take care of yourself. You gotta take care of yourself before you can take care of others. So I hope you will do that over the holidays, whatever that looks like for you, do it, take care of yourself so you can come back refreshed in the new Year this time. Uh Unlike Thanksgiving, good holiday wishes, whatever holiday you celebrate Happy New Year, these holiday wishes come on time. Not uh not the week after like uh like we saw with Thanksgiving. Unbelievable. I hope you enjoy your time off. I hope you enjoy your holidays. Happy New Year and we will see you in 2025 K happy holidays. Everyone spend it with family and we’ll see you in 2025. We’ve got VU but loads more time, here’s the rest of looking to 2025. Is it paranoia or prudence with Gene and Amy? The presumption of expertise in the, in our vast federal agency bureaucracy uh is, is no, is no longer. And so that it’s, it’s interesting, the, the standard uh one standard was, is arbitrary and capricious that uh that the interpretation or that the regulation is arbitrary and it’s so arbitrary that it, it, it uh is contrary to what Congress intended. And so that regulation should be ignored. And you know, we the company challenging it shouldn’t be held to its standards. Now. It seems like arbitrariness is, is welcome because any interpretation uh has potential validity in the courts, if you can persuade a judge and maybe in some cases, a jury, I think a lot of these would be bench trials with Ju ju with judge judges. But whatever, if you can, if you can persuade the finder of fact that uh that your interpretation, however arbitrary it might be is more appropriate than you could prevail. So it’s bringing arbitrariness and capriciousness into it’s welcoming arbitrariness and, and uh fringe theories as having potential merit. Now, they may not prevail but they’ll, they’ll, they’ll at least get a hearing. Now. Think about this too, Tony. The company that wants to bring the lawsuit to challenge the validity of the regulation might get to choose the court in which to file the complaint right. So they often go to Texas, um and they get a court that is favorable to, to maybe to, to corporate powers and, and uh not believers of climate change and, and you know, so they can choose the forum and forum shopping can be really problematic and, you know, with, with the end of Chevron deference, more arbitrariness, you can, you can file your case in any of the federal districts throughout the country that you think would be most favorable. That’s absolutely correct. Amy’s head, their head is bobbing with disbelief and I mean, I can only hit it against the desk so many times per day, you know, without a crude, the bumps aren’t showing a hat on, you know. Well, you have your hat protection but it’s also, it’s early in the pacific time, still several hours left in the day. Like the Grinch right now, Tony. No, there, there’s, there’s cause for concern. Um, the, the, the, uh, the composition of the court, the Supreme Court has enormous sway over, uh, over our, our laws, our culture just, you know, our, our lives. So these are a couple of instances we’re gonna turn to Amy. I’m probably not going to make anything sound better than g, well, it’s not a competition. I know I just, all arbitrary. I thought you were like wanting to pick up the tone, you know, but all arbitrary and capricious opinions are welcome. Your, your opinions are not neither arbitrary nor capricious. Um but uh you are hearing from folks about their concern about the, the, the potential of a, of a, a changed economy, uh marketplace and uh potential fundraising impacts. What, what are you, what are you hearing from folks? You, you have your ear to the ground? Yeah, I mean, you know, I think everyone, at least in the US, I’m sure you have listeners elsewhere thanks to the internet but have spent, I don’t know how much of our lives over the last election cycle. Constantly hearing about the economy, constantly hearing about tariffs, constant, all of these things about the market. And it doesn’t matter if any of them are real or not or have already happened or maybe one day gonna happen, it doesn’t matter. It means there’s now a real air of uncertainty about what’s gonna happen to the economy. And unfortunately, in the nonprofit sector, we know that the winds of the economy shifting also shift philanthropy and how they may have a more conservative view over their own um corpus and, and what they want to spend. And of course, that means then for the nonprofits, you know, are we competing even harder for fewer funds? Are funders kind of back to the first piece of this conversation in 9495 are funders not wanting to be seen resourcing organizations who talk about certain political situations. Um, you know, it just has created a lot of uncertainty and what, you know, we’re hearing from organizations is, um, of course, when there was a lot of uncertainty in 2020 the pandemic was shifting, everything, organizations didn’t, you know, know how to adjust organizations were laying staff off or sh you know, all of those big shifts meant the things that were really quick to go was no professional development spending, no technology spending, no training. And those were also the resources that would have allowed organizations to adjust and to be nimble and to know how to continue moving through these really um confusing or, or unpredictable times. And so I think because folks who already experienced that once they’re starting to feel like, oh my gosh, if funding is uncertain, if how we’re operating is uncertain, we can’t let go of some of our tools and training and resources that allow us to think and adjust and, you know, make really, really maybe quick but strategic choices instead of reactionary choices that maybe we experienced before, you know, and had to learn the hard way that, oh, we don’t just do everything on zoom or whatever it might be, you know. Um And I think coupled with that, with some of these uh talked about threats to a lot of different communities. Organizations are also feeling like, you know, are our system secure. Do we know what data we have and which communities, it might compromise if it was either demanded of us from the government. Or hacked and stolen from us? You know, what, what duties do we have as an organization that serves communities who are in the process of, you know, getting documentation or a path to citizenship? What if we have data on these folks because they’re in our services and in our programs, are we vulnerable as an organization? And also are we maybe making them vulnerable by having their data? And how do we think about that? You know, how do we prepare our systems to be um ready to navigate maybe threats or challenges that come up? So I think it’s a lot, it’s also December and everybody is tired and wants to put up that out of office on their email and just like take a break, which absolutely you should do, you are entitled to, to take that break. But I think folks are feeling really worried about what’s ahead and not totally prepared, you know, to know how to, how to navigate it yet. Yeah, uncertainty. We, we don’t, we don’t, we don’t do well in uncertain environments whether they’re financial, physical, whether, you know, we don’t uh it doesn’t matter. We, we um uncertainty is unsettling. Um I will say some of what you described. I, I don’t, I don’t want to uh promote paranoia, but some of that introspect, introspection and self evaluation, you know, it has value too, 0 100% and data security resilience, right? And those are not new things you know, any day of the year, any year it is. If you came to N 10, we would say, hey, do you know what data you have on your community? And do you know where it’s stored? And do you know if it’s secure, you know, these aren’t new things for us to talk about. But I think they are very new things for some organizations to think about in their systems and actually like put into place, you know, even if they’ve maybe had a more theoretical conversation about, oh, you know, do we wanna answer community questions through Facebook D MS? You know, that’s probably not safe, let’s not do that but didn’t then have the rest of the conversation of OK, well, what data do we have on those folks? What, which systems is it in? Do we know how we’re maintained? You know, and the uncertainty of what’s the common kind of threats to so many different communities that, you know, are maybe part of a lot of different missions is forcing I think folks to think about the whole rest of the equation instead of just that first part that that’s maybe where they focused in the past. I thought a lesson that came from the the pandemic was that we, we not make financial decisions that are short sighted, like, you know, cutting professional development and technology, but rather that we go to our supporters with our needs and how the, how the uh the, the missions may have grown, the, the program work may have expanded because of, in that case, the pandemic. Uh and you know, our need is so much greater rather than making the, the short sighted, you know, cuts. I think that we could say there are a lot of lessons from 2020 that we should still have and that we can point to people on learning investments in racial equity investments in equitable practices, investments in staff. Yes, absolutely. I heard many promises in 2020 about all of these things. I heard many folks say they learned those lessons and here we are folks, you know, one of, one of the biggest job areas that has turned over is any equity related title, right? People have eliminated those positions or eliminated the people in those positions. Like there are lots of lessons that I wish were deeply learned and you’re talking about one of them. But I think what we’re hearing is that organizations haven’t deeply learned that and folks are already feeling the crunch of ok. Well, we probably can’t come to the conference. We probably can’t do that course we pro because we know that’s gonna be what gets eliminated from the budget. What are you, what are you thinking? I would just add kind of on the funding issue. You know, we’ve got um um Lan and Vivek who are supposed to like get rid of $2 trillion of the federal budget, they want to eliminate head, smart head start. Um And uh just so many other programs they want to cut down on Social Security and Medicare. So, you know, there’s a lot of people who um justifiably are scared right now and um and know that their missions will, that are already operating in more demand than they can meet, it will only accelerate. Yeah, and not a lot of answers yet. So, um I, I offer everybody my own. Not that it means anything but a little bit of grace at this period because it’s, it’s, it’s tough times right now and a lot of, lot of fear and I think I don’t have a solution necessarily. I don’t think that Gene or you Tony are trying to say there’s a solution or one right path through all the uncertainty just to acknowledge like if you’re maintaining a lot of plates of anxiety, we see you, we also are spinning those plates and like it’s really difficult that actually the only thing is to wait and see what we need to do with them. You know, there, there isn’t some magic ball that tells us. Oh, actually, this is gonna be the one thing that happens. We just don’t know and that’s not comforting or helpful when we’re trying to be thoughtful in our organizations and anticipate what all of those options might be, you know, OK. Uh uh somber but uh but justified, you know. Um there there is a lot of uncertainty and on the legal side, on the uh economy and fundraising side, uh I mean, you said it, I mean, you know, we, we don’t know but it’s the uncertainty that is uh unsettling. Yeah, we know as a sector we can do hard things. We have faced hard situations, we know that we can do it. The, the real, I think tension in the air for the sector now is that we don’t know what the hard thing is we’re gonna have to do, you know. And so we’re like, you, you’re packing for a trip where you don’t know where you’re gonna go and you’re like, well, do I need a swimsuit? Do I need a hat? Like, I don’t know, I don’t know what resource to put in here because I don’t totally know what’s ahead and I think that’s what makes it really difficult, not that we’re not gonna be able to do it, you know. Yeah, I mean, look at what we have overcome uh September 11th, uh a pandemic. Uh well, before the pandemic was the great recession. And then the next milestone that I can think of is the pandemic. Um And I, I know that we are stronger as a community. If we are United, if we stand up for each other and for the community at large, we, we can overcome whatever uncertainties and challenges are ahead of us when, when we remain united, steadfast you know, all, all for 11, for all that’s uh it, it comes from the three musketeers, but it uh it applies in lots of uh lots of situations and, and this is certainly one of them. Um We’re strong, we’re strong when we’re united. I think community power building is kind of what the my optimistic hope is. Um as we face tough times, um nonprofit leaders and their supporters, um they band together, they, they work through the problems as you mentioned to, we worked through many before. Some of them have been super challenging when we look back generations before us um going through wars and other crises and nonprofits. We’re really like the, the strength and the humanity of the country when they look to the people they served. And hopefully we’re, we’re getting to that again. We’re not making decisions without the community. We’re, we’re making it with the community now. All right. Any other closing thoughts? The last thing I wanted to say because, you know, me, I’m always compelled to have recommendations um for things that people can do. And I too am a human that likes a to do list. Um And I will offer that to others. But yeah, I know we’ve talked about this so many times, Tony, you and I over the years about community committees and you know, ways of building transparency around your technology projects or, you know, having a tech committee that helps you prioritize But to Gene’s point, if you don’t already as an organization have a mechanism, whatever that might be to hear feedback from your community, not like an evaluation for somebody that was in a program or something like that. But I mean, a community committee, a committee of community members that you talk to once a quarter or a town hall event or whatever type of process you might wanna have, this is the time to have it because I think when things are really difficult, we can as staff feel like every single thing that is in the news or every single thing that could be on our community members, minds are on their minds and that they are like judging us for it. But if you have a way to, to really be in conversation with your community directly, you’ll be able to say, ok, the only thing our community wants to know from us is this and we can answer it and we can tell them or hey, our community is really worried about this thing that has nothing to do with us, but they’re really worried about it. So maybe that’s an opportunity for us to partner with an organization that does work on that and show that we’re listening and that we’re part of helping them have access to the resources they care about or whatever it might be, right? Um Because it’s a lot harder to call on a community that doesn’t exist when you’re in need than it is to be in community with people all the time. Um So, you know, if, if there’s anything to put on your January to do list while so much is still uncertain, it’s really to make sure you have some space to be in conversation directly with your community in me. Simple word. They’re at Amy Sample ward.org and at Amy Rs Ward and Jan Takagi, the firm is at Neo Law group.com and he’s at GT and we will convene again. Uh maybe not January, mid February, mid to late February, I think. Uh Well, let’s see what, let’s see what happens in the month of January, but certainly uh latest, you know, February, we will convene and uh and be in community again. Thanks Tony for always making this space. Big hugs Jean. Thank you, Tony right back at you, Amy. Happy New Year. Happy New Year. Happy Holidays. Next week, there’s no show and there’s no show the week after. We’ll be back fresh on January 6th, 2025. Happy New Year. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you find it at Tony martignetti.com. Happy New Year were sponsored by donor box, outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor. Box.org. Happy New Year. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martignetti. The show social media is by Susan Chavez Mark Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. You with us next week. No, you won’t be with us next week. You’re with us in January 2025 for nonprofit radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95% go out and be great. Happy New Year.
James Misner explains what he sees as the right and left brain activities of your nonprofit’s fundraising. There are relationships and data; stories and metrics; motivations and outcomes; emotions and systems; and, more brain interactions. Your objective is to balance the art and the science. James is CEO of The Kipos Group.
Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
Welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite abdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer from neuromyelitis optica if I saw that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate with what’s up? Hey, Tony, this week it’s the Art and science of fundraising. James Meisner explains what he sees as the right and left brain activities of your nonprofits. Fundraising. There are relationships and data, stories and metrics, motivations and outcomes, emotions and systems and more brain interactions. Your objective is to balance the art and the science. James is CEO of the Kebos group. On Tony’s Take Two Tales from the train were sponsored by donor box, outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor box.org. Here is the art and science of fundraising. It’s a pleasure to welcome to nonprofit radio, James Meisner. He is the founder and CEO of the Kos Group over his career. He has facilitated the raising of hundreds of millions of dollars to support nonprofits. He’s a trusted expert in fundraising strategy, staff, culture and implementation. James focuses on small and mid size nonprofits engaged in direct service. That’s our target audience right here, small and mid size listeners. His company is at the Kos group.com. Kos is K IP OS. So they’re at the keep Posts group.com. And you’ll find James on linkedin, James Meisner. Welcome to nonprofit radio, Tony. Thanks so much for having me. I am excited about this conversation and hopefully we get to share some uh good value and wisdom to the other 95% the small and mid size nonprofit executives out there. Thank you for picking up on that. Absolutely. Yes, that’s uh that’s those are our listeners in the small and mid size orgs. So we are talking about the uh the art and science of fundraising. Uh I know you want these two to work together, not be exclusive of each other. Let’s just give a high level overview. What, what do you see as the art and the s versus the science, which they’re not working. Of course, when I say verses, they’re not working against each other. I know that’s key to, to uh what we want to talk about, but just define them for us, the art and the science. Absolutely. Most nonprofits think of this as a problem to solve. We either have to be completely data oriented, scientific buttoned up and rigid. It’s on one side and the other is we have to be free flowing. We have to be passionate, we have to be uh innovative and in tune. Uh and most people think of this as a problem to solve. And instead it’s really just a tension to manage. And I think the magic happens in nonprofits, especially in marketing and fundraising. When you blend both of these things seamlessly together, bring the left side of the brain, the right side of the brain together. uh allow your teams to bring their whole self to work and uh and dive into both. That’s, that’s what I get excited about seeing. Uh people of both sides of this come together to bring their best to their organizations and to their givers. So you want this to be a symbiotic relationship. It has to be not parasitic, not one feeding off the other symbiotic, they’re living together in harmony. It, it 100% has to be OK. Let’s think of the the science side for a second. OK. Science is linear think of the scientific method, right? We all learned that what in first or second grade, my, my my kids are doing it right now. Science starts with questions and observations. So what questions you know, could a small and mid size nonprofit leader be asking, why are my donors lapsing? Why aren’t we raising more money right now? OK. That’s the first step in a scientific process. And then you observe and then you develop a hypothesis and then you set up an experiment to measure that hypothesis. And at the end of that measurement period, you then say, hey, was my hypothesis right wrong. Was it directionally? Right? Directionally wrong? And, and you hone it as you go, I see a lot of nonprofits skipping that entire thing, especially in the small and mid size space where there’s not a lot of capacity, there’s not a lot of staff and maybe the attention span for risk is two weeks and that’s not enough time to develop an actual experiment and to measure. Um And we can dive more into this on the art side. OK. Um The artistic process is messy if anybody tries to linearly create an artistic process, chances are they’re not an actual artist. Um And when you think of art and you think of let’s just use Renaissance art for a second. Most of it comes out of deep seeded pain and struggle. There’s this story. Uh I think Malcolm Gladwell did on a podcast one time that the Swiss created clots which are precise and they created chocolate which is scientific. Uh No great art came out of Switzerland during the Renaissance because was neutral, they were wealthy, there was no pain or struggle but the surrounding countries were full of artists. Most nonprofits, especially those who are doing direct implementation, they are dealing with something that is painful. They see kids that are not living until the age of five, they see refugees on the move from persecution and war, they see kids in the US be it in rural, you know, Appalachia or in urban centers who are just not thriving uh you know, into their high school years and into their adult years, you can’t with science and linear processes, describe that story to another human being without being deeply in touch with emotion. And that’s the art side of this. All right. So let’s dive in a little uh a little deeper on, on how these two work together. Uh I, I think we should, you know, we should probably talk in more detail about each of them and then, and then put them together in this symbiotic uh relationship. You started with the, the science side. So let, let’s approach that, let’s uh let’s drill into some detail. What, what are, what are the elements of the scientific side of fundraising that we’re later gonna put together in this symbiotic relationship with the, with the art side? And we’re gonna, we, we’re gonna see, we’re gonna see fundraising, we, we’re, we’re pushing fundraising nirvana, right? Is that right? Is that where we’re, is that where we’re, is that our objective when we put these two together, let’s just follow it up into the right growth and uh let’s, let’s dive into it. So the first thing you have to have an observation, most people would observe, especially right now in our climate that they are not growing like they would wanna grow. So then let’s ask some questions and develop a hypothesis. I think a reasonable hypothesis for most small and mid size groups would be we need to do better major donor cultivation. OK. Uh So then let’s set up our experiment. What do we believe would lead to better major donor cultivation? It’s not just measuring the number of meetings, it’s not just blasting out emails. We’ve tried that all before. Uh So let’s say it’s a really great donor development process that we then measure. So let’s figure out that process first. You need leads. OK. Uh So how do we find them? Probably three or four main ways we get referrals from our existing major donors or we look in our small and mid size portfolio and do a well screen and say, hey, we think these people could become major donors. So we measure that. How many do we actually have? Well, then what do you need to do after that? You actually need to meet with them and qualify them. So let’s do that, set up those meetings, qualify them. The goal there is to figure out, hey, could they become a major donor or no? If the answer is no, it’s fine, you know, move on. Don’t waste your time. You don’t have that much time. Uh If you’re small and mid size nonprofit. Uh so ask some questions about what they’re passionate about. Don’t just tell your story uh to them uh ask them questions, see how they respond. And at the end of that conversation where they probably talk 80% of the time and you talk 20% of the time. If they’re still in great, they qualify, then let’s journey with them, send them great content, bring them to the site, engage them with other major donors in community. If they’re still there, eventually you earn the right to ask a question. Does it seem good and right to you that I could bring next time we meet together a proposal for how you could deepen and expand this work that you seem to care so much about. You’ve done all that right? Chances are they’re gonna say yes, you bring the proposal and you get to measure each step of that. Uh And this isn’t short, this isn’t a two week experiment. This is a 69, 12 month experiment to see, hey, does measuring this hypothesis actually work. Uh And the end result is dollars go up into the right. They stay flat or they decline. But by measuring it, you get to see each step along the way. Is it the process that’s broken? Is it how we communicate in each step of the process? And you get to dissect it? Uh But if you follow a process like that 89 times out of 10, it’s gonna work. That’s the scientific side of doing it. And you hear a lot of people that say, hey, you can’t measure meetings anymore. That doesn’t work. I say that’s, that’s crazy. You have to measure something instead of just the end result, but you can’t end there. You need to add the art side uh into this uh for the true magic to happen. Let’s do that actually, you know, let, let’s, let’s deal with a couple of different points. Uh Science, art, science, art, instead of what I had proposed a few minutes ago, let’s talk all about the science and then let’s talk all about the art and then put them together. So I think, I think it’s, it’s more, it’s easier to follow. So we, we’re uh, I mean, I, I’ve been doing plans giving fundraising for 27 years, but I want you to explain what you see as the, the art of the, the relationship side. Where, where, where, how do you, we, we talked about the art, the science, some of the science side. How do you, how does that contrast with the, the relation, the, the art side of the, the relationship? Let’s talk about the art side when you’re in that qualifying, meeting with the giver. If you’re only thinking about your numbers and your metrics and you’re not attuned to what that person is feeling and thinking, it doesn’t matter what your numbers show, you’re not gonna make progress with it, you’re gonna have to attune yourself to what painful thing are they dealing with in their life. Did their kid just leave for college and they became an empty nester and their emotions, you know, are all over the place right now. Did a parent uh just pass away? Uh That’s the art side. No amount of numbers and metrics are gonna tell you how to engage with that when you ask them, hey, what do you long to see change in our world? No numbers or metrics are gonna tell you uh how to respond to that. You’re gonna have to be empathetic. You’re gonna have to experience a little bit of that longing of that pain, of that desire to see something changed in the world uh with them uh to be able to engage appropriately in your space. Tony. You’re talking about plan giving. Some people don’t like to have conversations about the end of their life. Not that plan giving is just that, but that’s a big component of it. If you’re not using art, using emotion attuned to, hey, this person is really uncomfortable talking about end of life uh decisions right now, you’re just gonna offend them. Who cares if your numbers are, are in the right space. Uh Another part of this is uh storytelling is so important. People give to a story, uh broad, big narrative stories and storytelling is an art. I don’t care how many meetings you have and how many um you know, conversations you track in your metrics. If you can’t tell a story human to human, either across the zoom call or across the coffee table. Uh You’re never gonna build the, the real human connections that cause people to make big giving decisions. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money but also supports you in retaining your donors, a partner that helps you raise funds, both online and on location, so you can grow your impact faster. That’s Donor box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers, just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability, your organization needs, helping you help others visit donor box.org to learn more. Now, back to the art and science of fundraising. I agree. Uh II I think uh my, my flaw is probably uh I’m, I’m more of the, the art and the, the uh the human side of fundraising and not enough of the metric scientific side. Uh So I, I hear you, we, we do have to measure uh we, we have and you know, with different clients, I have KPIS and things like that that I’m responsible for. Uh But I, I still probably it, it’s just, it’s, it’s the reason I entered nonprofit fundraising and plan giving specifically is because I love the relationship work. So I, I tend to default to, to the more of the art. So this is valuable, this is, this is valuable for me. Um, all right, let’s, let’s talk a little more le let’s go back to the science side now again. Uh, another, you know, um, you, you talk about, uh sustainable revenue engines but, but you know, what, what are we, what are we talking about there? What are we measuring there back on the science side? Yeah. Uh, let’s just talk about the, the most horrible number. I think that exists in the nonprofit fundraising space right now. And that’s retention rates, you know, on average right now, every year, between 40 45% of donors stay year to year with their nonprofit, which means that more than half actually stop giving to a nonprofit. Ok. That on the science side, that should blow people’s mind. That’s like a showstopper right there. We’ve had guests talk, talk about even as high as 75%. We’ve had some clients that have come in to only keep 20% of their donors every year. Ok. What in the world? We need to analyze that and figure out what the heck is going wrong. Ok. So we need to measure that and then figure out how do we fix this. Um And, and see if we can’t get that, if it is, you know, 20% 25%. Let’s get that to 30 let’s get that to 50 let’s get that to 70 because if you’re churning through your donors over and over and over again, uh that is not, that is not helpful, that is not sustainable. So, the science side of that is OK. Well, why are they leaving? What’s the hypothesis? And for most organizations, your hypothesis should come down to. We’re actually not letting these people know where their money is going and what good it’s doing in the world. But I’m engaging with a client right now and I actually got them as a client because my family gave to them. Uh We have an adopted kid. This is a foster care organization, uh foster care adoption organization we gave to them and it wasn’t a small gift. It was a, a good mid size, you know, mid-level gift. I got one letter letting me know where the money was going. Just one and they’re literally two miles down the street from my house. So I, I called them up and said, hey, I would like to keep giving to you, but I need to know what you’re doing with the money. Uh They had other donors hundreds that weren’t professional fundraisers and didn’t have 2025 years in this space. Uh I went in and I analyzed their, their data. They were sending four communication pieces a year or you know how many times my kids, school texts me when they have a half day. So I don’t forget to pick them up. It’s something like 11 or 12. If I can’t remember to pick my kid up after two text messages. How the heck am I gonna remember your nonprofit from four communication pieces a year? Talking about a size major gift too. Yeah, a good for them. It was a, it was a high level mid-level gift, you know, for that organization. And sadly, that is more the norm uh that I think any of us in this space would like. Um So we need to go in and fix that. That’s the science of OK, what’s our communication cadence? How are we uh how are we building this out? What content do people actually desire? Um And you do that through interviews, you do that through asking uh them. Uh And on the art side, some of these people are probably pretty ticked off that they took your 10 grand and didn’t do anything with it. Wait, go back a sec asking them asking them what, what, what, what are, what are we surveying? What are we asking them in conversations? Yeah. So if 80% of your donors or 50% of your donors are leaving, you need to go back and actually have a serious conversation with your high net worth givers. It needs to be face to face if they’re willing uh with your small and mid size donors, probably a survey and saying, hey, we think we goofed, we think we messed up here. We need to, you know, understand how to get better. Can you help us get better because we all care about this thing and ask specific questions. Uh Why did you stop giving? Did we communicate with you enough when we did communicate? Was it the right type of communication? You know, we need to ask that kind of stuff to our donors and own. We don’t always do things right. You’re, you’re even suggesting surveying folks who, who are no longer donors who left a absolutely. How, how scientifically would you figure out what caused them to laugh? Leave unless you ask them and for a person to leave? I do think, and this is the art side that probably an apology is needed. Uh I think we did something wrong here. That’s where you get into the art and the empathy and the pain because people don’t give just because they have spare money lying around. People give because they want to see something changed in the world and they’re deeply passionate about the areas that they give to. So if as a nonprofit, you’ve done something wrong, uh you need to, you need to own that. Uh And that’s art not science in terms of how you own that mistake. You also can uh uh on the science side can be surveying your, your existing donors. You know, how do you wanna be contacted? Uh What, what, what do you want to hear from us from uh about, do you, are you interested in our events or you’re not? Uh can we send you solicitations and how should we do that? Do you prefer postal mail, texting, you know, uh, email, um, or do you just want to do it on your own calendar? You know, or do you want reminders? You know, these are the, these are the things that can also be surveyed and then of course, the all important, uh, not, not just follow up but the, the honoring of the, of the preferences when you ask somebody something and they tell you what they prefer and you don’t do it, you don’t follow through on it. Um You know, talk to your partner or your spouse. Hey, what would you like to do this weekend? And they tell you and then you completely ignore it and go do something else. It’s not a great weekend. Say with your givers, if they say, hey, I wanna be contacted this time, I want one meeting a year, remind me via text message. My email inbox is too crazy. You have to follow through and do it, which means you need to have your systems uh built efficiently in the back end, which is more of a scientific, you know, thing than an artistic thing. And, and then honor what people have told you. I always think of, uh, related to that, uh asking what someone’s birthday is, you know, if they’re gonna share their birthday or you might just ask birth month, you know, but if, if they, if you’re asking for any kind of birthday info, then the presumption is that you’re gonna remember their birthday or their birthday month. So you need to do that. You need to have a system in place that sends you a reminder a week before everybody’s birthday that you’re gonna send a card or the day of that, you’re gonna, you’re gonna call them if, if they’re, if they’re well enough known that you, you can place a happy birthday call. Uh, You know, if you’re gonna, if you’re gonna survey those things that you’re saying, you, you need, you know, you need to, uh you need to, you need to follow through on what you’re asking about. Um It just, it feels empty to ask someone’s birthday and then ignore it, they never do anything with it. That’s right. What was the point? Yeah. All right. Um Let’s, let’s, uh this is, uh I’m enjoying this now, this uh compare and contrast the uh the science with the art. What else to tell us some more about the science side, the, the, as I as, as I, the uh relationship, you know, default guy, the art, default guy would say uh the cold, hard, the cold, hard, scientific uh side, share some more of that side. Let’s talk about um teams. OK? And how teams can, can uh bring the art, art, art and the science together. One of the most important functions that I think as a, you know, chief revenue officer that I’ve ever hired for is, you know, the development coordinator. Ok. Um, people call it different things, but this is kind of the grease at the elbow position that makes sure everybody is putting their information into the CRM that’s giving you your weekly and your monthly reports as a leader, these hires are deeply scientific people. Um, the best one that I ever hired people called him. Uh, I won’t share his name but they, they had a nickname for him that was close to robots. Uh Just because the guy was so, you know, is very robotic in terms of how he, he does stuff. It was the most valuable position that I’ve ever hired for. Uh because like you, Tony, I also, I, I gravitate towards the art side, the relational side, the engagement side with people. Um I needed a development coordinator to show me what true North was scientifically. Um I am horrible in CRM. Si need someone to sit down and, you know, tell me to input my information. Most major gift officers are, uh I needed someone to do the calculations of year, over year fundraising. This is before, you know, every CRM had that automated, you know, into it. Um He needed to be that true North for the rest of the team and to have the, the hard conversations sometimes about, hey, we’re not doing so well. Right now, we’re not actually meeting our metrics every month. We need to figure out how to solve this on the other side because I am more art. Uh like you are, if you, if you leave every donor meeting and you are an artist and you feel, oh my goodness, they’re judging me. I didn’t do that right. And because artists are sometimes you know that way uh you need the data people, the science people to say actually your numbers were trending in the right direction. You’re getting your meetings, you’re asking the right questions, the the gifts are coming in. Uh Hey, it’s not all about you and how you feel right now. Uh On the flip side, the, the art people sometimes need to tell the data people. Hey, I’m with the person. I know we want a big gift right now. Uh But someone passed away in their family or their kids going through an addiction crisis. I need you to lay off me right now on the numbers because I’m dealing with a real human right now and I’m helping them and adding value and guiding them through the situation. Hey, number one, it’s the right thing to do. Number two, it’s gonna pay off but not for a year or two. So I need you to calm down, you know, science guy. Uh when you bring those two things together on the team and there’s mutual respect and the leader facilitates that mutual respect. Uh Really wonderful things start to happen and people begin to appreciate uh different giftings and abilities on a team that are usually kind of, you know, uh, butting heads with each other. I wanna pull on a thread that you, you said it sounds like it was transformational for you that, that you, uh, the development coordinator you hired, helped you find true North. What, what were you looking for in a, in a development coordinator? You when you were making this hire? Oh, this is a great question. Finally, finally, we’re half an hour in finally, a great question. All right. This is great because I was unprepared for it. Numbers when they’re not interpreted by people who are numbers, people can tell you any story you want to tell. We’ve all been there, right? When you’re doing the development meeting, you’re with your staff and all the numbers got pulled the wrong way and uh no one’s entering stuff in the right way and, oh, I didn’t know. So your numbers get messy. Uh I needed someone to cut through all that noise. I could manage the relationships, uh with the team. It was a, you know, 4050 person team at the time, but I needed someone to actually do that back end work so that we sat down to have the real meetings, uh the individual one on one performance meetings, the team debrief meetings that we didn’t spend 90% of the time complaining that the numbers and the data wasn’t right. So I needed a person to come in and, and, and operationalize all of that for me and I often encounter uh heads of fundraising that are, are one or the other. They are the systems people, let’s build the machine or they’re the one that’s out there and they’re managing the top 50 donors. It’s very hard to find a senior leader that has both of those things together. So if you’re the science, data, build a system, build a machine person, you need some really strong high eq people around you who are gonna go out there and deal with the uh the other humans that make the magic happen. If you’re like me and you, Tony and you’re, you like to be out there, you like to be engaging with individuals, you need someone behind the scenes to be building the machines and making sure all the cogs are turning. But at the same time, it’s very hard to find people who can live in both spaces. Usually you can bungee to both spaces for a few hours, but you’re, you’re in one space just because of how you are and how you are created and designed in your upbringing. And you really need to get support uh for yourself. I know that’s hard for our audience, small and mid size people, but it works when you get that right. The introspection is important. You, you need to know where you fall, what your skills are. You know, as you said, how you’re wired and either hire an employee or, or employees or, or get help as a, uh, on a consulting basis with, with the other side that, you know, the, the, the, the scientific, the, the numerical, the analysis, if you are more the relationship side, that’s, that’s 100%. Right. One of my, uh, bosses at one point in time, gosh, I was probably in my twenties, pulled me aside and said, here’s your Achilles heel and you’re gonna have this for the rest of your career. You run really fast and it’s good because we were in the humanitarian space and you need to run fast when things are happening. You need to hire a world class process person to help everybody else catch up with where you’re running as a leader. He was absolutely right. And even in our company, I need that today because I’m still running fast. Uh It’s just who I am and I need a process person, you know, to come behind me. It’s time for Tony’s take two. Thank you, Kate. This week it’s tales from the train because I’ve done some Amtrak travel lately and it reminds me that Amtrak is so much more comfortable uh uh more pleasant travel experience. So if you have the option, I would urge you to look at Amtrak as, as a possibility for travel instead of flying. Now, I know in a lot of parts of the country you can’t, I’m, I’m, I’m near the northeast Corridor. And when I was up in New York and I was traveling from there. So, you know, between Boston and Washington DC, I think that’s 80% of the trips and the revenue that Amtrak gets because it’s the most populated part of the country that they serve. So I know it doesn’t make sense in, in a lot of other parts of the country, but just consider it because when you’re on Amtrak, you always get wide seats like first class, the first class with seats, um, they’re comfortable big. There’s leg room, there’s never a middle seat. Amtrak doesn’t have three seats. Uh on one side, it’s always two and two, there is never a middle seat that you get stuck with. Um, every Amtrak seat has a, a plug power. You don’t have to worry about seatbelts. You don’t have to put a bag under the seat in front of you. All the luggage goes overhead, but you, there is room. If you want to have a bag at your feet, there’s a lot more room than airplanes. Um Some of them, even some cars even have foot rests. That seems to be kind of a on and off. Uh I’m not sure how, you know, but occasionally there’s foot rests that, that fold down. Um The, the aisles on trains are wider than the aisles on planes. You have a cafe car that you can walk to anytime you don’t have to worry about uh, seatbelt signs coming on and you know the pilot saying we’re in turbulence. So now you can’t get up, you can get up any time you like use the bathroom, go to the cafe car. Um, you don’t have to check luggage unless you have really like four or five pieces or something that more than you can carry. But pretty much I, I really don’t even know what the luggage policy is on Amtrak. It seems to me if you can carry it on, you can bring it with you and put it in the overhead. Uh and, and a lot of cars have storage space at the, at the end of uh the car also for extra, but I think it’s pretty much whatever you can carry. You’re welcome to bring it on. So you don’t have to worry about like two bags only. And um and then also arrival when you take Amtrak, you arrive downtown. Think of, think of where the Moynihan train hall is in New York City uh where Union Station is in Washington, 30th Street Station in Philadelphia. Uh the Wilmington station, the Joe Biden station in Wilmington, Delaware. These are the ones I know best. Oh, but also Boston, I’ve been up to Boston. Um not the back bay but Boston Maine, these stations are downtown. So you don’t have to a, a long Lyft or Uber or shuttle to get to where you wanna go. If you’re going downtown, it’s not like you’re 30 miles away because that’s where the airport is. You arrive downtown. So consider it. Ok. That’s a, that’s a long thing on Amtrak, but think about it because especially arriving downtown, you might save time even though trains go slower than planes. But the time you’re gonna, you spend in traffic getting to the airport and then you have time, you wait in the airport because you gotta be there early for security, obviously. And then the travel time back from the airport to where you’re, you might need to go. If it’s in the ci city center of a city, you might actually save time or it be equivalent, uh, on Amtrak and you’ll have a much more comfortable ride. Ok? That’s enough on Amtrak. And that is Tony’s take two. Ok. Frequent Amtrak rider used to take Amtrak all the time from New York City to, uh, down to Wilmington to get home right to get home for Thanksgiving Christmas. And then I think right before our, our spring break. So I took it a good maybe borderline 20 times. Yeah, and that was like a span of two years. So I thought it was awesome. I mean, everyone was really quite too because it was kind of night time when I would ride. Um, and everyone was respectful. It might have been a little bit crowded at some points. Um, when I would take coach, it would be kind of hard to find a spot. But that’s also because I went during the holidays. Um, we talked about that once you have to be, you have to just be a little assertive and ask people, may I sit here when they have their luggage or their pet, you know, sitting on, uh, another, uh, uh, on a seat. But, you know, planes can be crowded. Planes can be crowded too. But, yes, I, I like Amtrak and I like that. My feet. It’s on the ground. I’m not up in the air. Yeah. Ok. You made me think of one other thing. The quiet car, every Amtrak train, at least in the northeast corridor has a quiet car. It’s usually the second to last car from the rear and there you’re not allowed to have cell phone conversations. You, if you’re, if you’re talking to your seat mate, you need to whisper and they’re pretty good about enforcing it too quiet car. But it’s just one car. The whole train, it’s like eight cars or 10 cars in a train. One is the quiet car. So sometimes I opt for the quiet car. If I know I don’t have to make any calls or anything like that. I haven’t been in one yet but I like the concept of it. Well, we gotta get you back on the train. But, yeah. All right, we’ve got Buku but loads more time. Here’s the rest of the art and science of fundraising with James Meisner. Is there more, uh, is there more, uh, science and art that we can, we can compare and contrast? I, I think we can, but let’s talk about how these can come together. Um, would that be ok, Tony? Yeah. Yeah. One of the things I’m always struck by is, uh, in Jim Collins book. Good to Great. Uh, I just listened to an episode of your podcast from November and you guys were talking about Jim Collins in, in Good to great. Uh One of the greatest things he talks about is the power of knee hand and that organizations and companies uh are often saying, hey, we have to choose A or we have to choose B and that is often a false dichotomy. And I think we’re, we’re talking about this in the, in the, in the, in the fundraising space. You get CEO S and heads of fundraising who say we have to be this, we have to be scientific, we have to be buttoned up, it has to be metric driven or do you have people on the other side? Just uh hey, wind me up and let me go tell stories. Those are false choices. And Jim Collins says that leaders who bring out the best of a and leaders who bring out the best in b are the ones who actually uh thrive and they’re the ones that actually grow uh their organizations. And I think in the nonprofit space, uh you see this happen all the time. You have a uh a CEO who comes up to the program side and they bring all the science and the monitoring evaluation and just want to slap that on to, you know, fundraising without bringing out the emotional storytelling, art side. Or you have a CEO come up through, you know, fundraising and marketing, who forgets all the monitoring evaluation and auditing and accounting. Um especially in small and mid size nonprofits. We need to say, let’s get the best of A and the best of B and bring these together. Uh So we’re not making a false choice. We’re managing the tension instead of choosing between two things that are uh uh falsely dichotomies against each other. OK? The, the power of the and the power of the end. All right. Um So let’s, let’s uh this is, this is our, this is our up into the right fundraising objective. This is where this is where we want to be, where the, the two, the two are coming together. Um Le let’s say more about, you know, systems um maybe have some examples of teams that, that are excellent at both. Yeah, there, there’s a team that I’ve gotten to work with for the past uh 1015 years or so on or off. They have mastered this, they’ve mastered it. Um They spent years becoming world class storytellers. How did they do that? You don’t become a world class storyteller by accident. You become a world class storyteller uh by deeply figuring out the emotional hooks in a story that are gonna cause people to respond to it. That was the art side. Well, how did a team of 50 people get really good at it? They brought the science site in, they practiced their storytelling and they still do to this day every single week. No one goes to a major giving meeting without practicing their story and having it evaluated by at least three other people inside the organization. Oh, really? Oh They do this like a role, well, not role playing, but you’re rehearsing, you’re rehearsing, they rehearse, they rehearse and they get that feedback. Um The, the leader of the current leader of that team jokes. I don’t care if you figured out the best wine or the best croissants to bring to that meeting. Uh You can show up with the sunny water for all I care, but you will practice your story before you go in. Um And there’s beauty in that because other people can critique it in a safe environment and say, hey, you forgot to ask AAA powerful question. At the end, you’re gonna have a hard time transitioning from this story into a conversation afterwards. Oh my goodness. You forgot this hook. I heard that story the other day in another meeting and you, you forgot this detail. Uh That’s really gonna um make it, make it s what this team noticed is as they implemented a process to get better at storytelling. Donors started responding, more zeros got added to gifts as they went. Um The art and the science uh coming together. Uh Another great example of this is uh I love mid-level fundraising programs. People forget, you know, they’re mid-level donors. Uh But I think mid-level donors are really fun in the future. Uh of most uh nonprofit uh fundraising programs, the science can tell you what your zone of opportunity is. Hey, we have this many people who we think can give between 1000 and $10,000 normal, you know, mid-level range. Um And there’s nothing there. The art side comes in and figures out what kind of community do these people want uh to come together. There’s another team that I’ve worked with for the past two years. They built a wonderful mid-level program. Um And the interesting thing that happened was their mid-level program has actually stayed flat. It hasn’t increased in revenue, it hasn’t decreased in revenue, but you know what’s happened? Their major gift program is off to the races. Uh They through great art through great questions and conversations figured out exactly what their mid-level audience wanted. And then they built the science side. How do we get our high uh higher annual funds, small donors to be into mid-level? And how do we bump up our mid-level people into major the science? What is some of the, what they did for the mid-level community that they created. They were the most transparent organization I’ve ever seen in their mid-level communication. They told their mid-level donors exactly what they were gonna get. Hey, we built this community for people like you. Here’s what people like us are. You know, you get between 1000 and $10,000 a year. There are this number of you. There’s, I forget the number 792 of us together. We’re gonna report to you more. We’re gonna ask you less. They literally said that we’re gonna tell you where your money’s going. And we’re gonna ask you for money fewer times a year. Within six months, they were off to the races. People just ate it up, they love the transparency. Um And uh we, they did a President’s weekend as part of a capital campaign a while ago and half the room was from their mid-level program. Now graduating from giving 10,000 to, you know, high five figures, low six figure gifts because somebody just said, I’m gonna tell you what’s happening here. I’m gonna tell you exactly what we need. I’m gonna stop bugging you with, you know, annual fund type appeals. And I’m gonna ask you when it really matters and people ate it up, Tony, they ate it up. What was the work of that organization? They were in the humanitarian space. So they were doing, uh you know, global poverty alleviation, conflict zones and refugees All right. So sort of build up that program. They sounds like they asked a lot of questions about, you know, what you would want from the community and what, what do you want as a mid-level donor? How can you know, how can we make this experience more valuable for you more meaningful, make your giving uh not make you giving more impactful for you and, and it sounds like folks came back with, you know, we’d like to know more about where our dollars are going. Yeah, they sent out a very simple, you know, almost um envelope size survey. It was a postcard, it was very low tech um and it was check boxes, mail this back to us. Uh They had something like a 40% response rate to that. It was really wonderful. Um And, and people told them exactly what they wanted to hear about, you know, when you’re working in disaster zones and with refugees in the US, you start to wonder what the people you know, really want to hear about. The donors just told them and they tagged it for him. So these people got refugee stories, these people got, you know, disaster response, conflict zone stories and something like 80%. We’re just like we like all of it, just keep telling us all the stories. Um The other great thing that happened and this is so important for small and mid size organizations is by telling that broad story. People stop designating their gifts. They started giving more money and they started giving it unrestricted or semi restricted, which gave that organization degrees of freedom that they had never imagined before all because they asked and 80% said we like it all. Um ok, so when you give these, you know, three or four things happened, their unrestricted revenue went through the roof. Mm What uh what else, what else can, can we uh can we talk about um AAA about around bringing these two together? Um You know, you mentioned uh the systems using, again, putting the science together with the art, using, using systems to uh move, move donors along in relation, you know, in a, throughout their spectrum of giving. Yeah, let’s, let’s talk about how they got annual fund givers to become mid-level givers and then mid-level givers to become major givers chronicles. The philanthropy actually wrote up a case study two or three years ago on this organization because they were so good at the, at the science side of it. So what chronicle what then, what’s the name of the organization? Shout them out. Oh, yeah. So it’s World Relief uh Global Humanitarian Organization based in the Baltimore, Washington uh region. Uh Karen Bryant at the time was their mid level uh director, she’s moved on and now is at a um climate change organization uh but great, great, great leader. Um what they did was they set up a system, a quarterly system where anybody that gave a single gift of $500 or more uh would be flagged in the system for the mid-level team to actually reach out. And thank because they had a hypothesis that if you’re given a $500 1st time single gift, you probably have more money to give, which, you know, nine times out of 10 is usually true. Um And then what they did every quarter is they actually invited those people to explore and join the mid-level program. They did a direct mail and phone call. A very simple campaign. Um Hey, we have something for people like you, uh that we think that would actually really increase uh your experience with us. And they told him exactly what it was, they invited them to it. But it was the simplest thing in the world and you know what people were like, yes, there were a few things here that made it sing quote unquote. Uh First was it happened quick. The systems in the back end flagged it quickly and you weren’t waiting 69, 10 months till somebody forgot about you to invite them into something. They were thanked really quickly and within 90 days they were invited to the next thing. Ok. Uh That’s really important. If somebody gives you a gift in December of 2024 and you don’t do anything to try to engage them until September of 2025 you’ve already lost them, they’ve moved on to the next thing, uh you need to be quick with this. Um And it worked dramatically. The next thing that they did is they would continually research using donor search and other, you know, well, screen engines, uh their mid-level portfolio and the mid-level team identified the top third of people that they thought had significant future potential for the organization. And they would start to treat them like major donors. They wouldn’t just throw them over to the major donor team, but they would do the birthday calls, the handwrit notes, they would invite them to some special events. Uh So they got used to having one on one attention because many mid-level donors if you go from, hey, uh we’re getting emails, we’re getting newsletters, we love this community and the quarterly, you know, online events and hey, do you wanna have coffee that jump is so hard for them because they don’t think of themselves often of being people of, of, of means of wealth. Uh So they started to condition or train their mid-level daughters to expect that and then what they did and this is the brilliance of this art and science coming together is four times a year. They would identify the people that they were, they thought most likely to become major givers. And they asked them if they wanted to become major givers, they would say, hey, we’re actually looking for 10 or 15 people from this mid-level community to come up and do more with us so that we could do XY and Z in our program space and they let them raise their hands and every time they did it, they had more hands raised than they needed at the time. Wow. What, what else were they enticing them with? What, what was there more of an enticement or was it all just program related? You know, if, if 15 people join us at the, at the major donor level, you know, we can do this with humanitarian. Uh That was the main hook because the, the message for mid level was, hey, uh we’re gonna ask fewer times and tell you more. So these people started really to get uh deeply engaged uh with the organization, but there was also uh a communal enticement. You know, we need 15 you to do this. And hey, when our staff come from overseas, we’re actually gonna get you together either in person or on zoom. So you can meet these people. Hey, when we are in your city, we’re gonna show up and we’re gonna, you know, have lunch and coffee and dinner. This is gonna become a big part of your life. Uh What we do together. So there was that communal aspect, I’ve never been a big fan of some of the um the T chay, you know, type incentives for, for givers a, get a book, join this club, you know, those types of things, uh, get, you know, elbow time with the CEO um, givers like community with other givers is what I found. People like to be with people that care about the same things, uh, that they do and the other things just naturally happen, but you don’t have to sell them on it. You saw them on the impact because people give through your organization to make a difference in the world, they don’t give to your organization. Yeah, through to make the difference that you, you, that they want to see. Absolutely. All right, this is excellent. Um Wrap it all up, you know, leave us with uh inspiration for putting together the uh the art and the science so we can have that, that uh the growth that we’re all looking for. Yeah, I want to end by talking about leadership. OK? I think the nonprofit space has a crisis of leadership. We’ve all talked about the, the great resignation after the pandemic. We’ve talked about burnout a ton. There’s new studies out, you know, even, you know, Q four of 2024 about just the next wave of nonprofit leader resignations. But in the fundraising space, this does not happen by accident. OK? It takes a leader to bring these things together and to create the conditions for team members to bring their best, whether it’s on the art side or the science side, this just won’t happen by accident. A, a leader needs to know, um that they have the responsibility to create the conditions for success for every team method, whether it’s a database and analysts were a front line fundraiser to bring their best every single day. And I see people abdicating that responsibility more and more as the world gets more and more stressful. So in ending teams that grow teams that move up into the right, the, the 2% of nonprofits that eventually break a million dollars in revenue, it doesn’t happen by accident, it happens because a leader says I’m actually gonna do something different. Uh Now, um I’m gonna ask the harder questions. I’m gonna uh invest in my team. I’m gonna create the art side of this organization and storytelling and questions and EQ and I’m gonna create the science side of this organization and invest in data and systems. And I’m gonna make sure through my leadership through how I model this, that these people start working together more. Uh Every year we talk about not enough nonprofits are breaking that million dollar barrier or that $10 million barrier. And I don’t think that bigger is better, Tony. OK? I think that bigger just means that you’re better funded, that you figured the funding side of things out. Uh I see so much innovation happening in the small and mid size space uh that I want this community of people uh to develop those leadership skills to bring the best of art and science together so they can move the needle and change some of these problems that have been plaguing our country and our world. Uh, for decades, if not generations, James Meisner, founder and CEO of the Kos group, tell us what Kos is K IP OS. What, what’s the, what’s the, what’s the? Yeah. What’s the Kos group about? Where’s that from? Yeah. Kebos group is the Greek word for garden during the pandemic. My kids and I planted over 1000 plants in our backyard because we were bored. Uh and we got into, into gardening and within six months, people were stopping by to take pictures uh in our yard, you know. Um And so when I started this company, I wanted to create something that helped uh people grow something beautiful. Uh and gardens are beautiful and they provide, you know, food for you if you, you know, grow vegetables and fruit and stuff. So, uh we want to help people grow beautiful things in their nonprofit. So, um that’s where the key plus group came from, James Meisner. You’ll find the company at the Kos group.com. You’ll find James on linkedin James. Thank you very much. Thanks for sharing your thinking. Thanks, Tony. It was great to be here with you today. Next week, Amy and Gene return to share what they’re looking at for 2025 on our last show of 2024. Can you believe this last show? It’s the next two weeks or after that, uh we have next week and then next two weeks after that, we’re off. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you to find it at Tony martignetti.com were sponsored by donor box. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity. Donor box. Fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor box dot org. Oh, that alliteration, fast, flexible, friendly fundraising forms. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Marinetti. The show social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation. Scotty be with us next week for nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95% go out and be great.
Stacy Palmer & Andrew Simon: The Chronicle of Philanthropy Leaders
Stacy Palmer is CEO of the now nonprofit newspaper, and the editor-in-chief is Andrew Simon. We talk about the transition from privately held to 501(c)(3); their plans for growth; the mission, values and priorities guiding them; new content that’s coming; improving mass media’s coverage of our community; the presidential election; potential threats to the sector; and a good deal more.
Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
And welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite abdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d be stricken with pika if you made me swallow the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate with the highlights. Hey, Tony, here’s what’s up the chronicle of philanthropy leaders. Stacy Palmer is CEO of the now nonprofit newspaper and the editor in chief is Andrew Simon. We talk about the transition from privately held to 501 C three. Their plans for growth, the mission values and priorities, guiding them new content that’s coming, improving mass media’s coverage of our community, potential threats to the sector and a good deal. More on Tony’s take two with a lackluster host. You get a late holiday wish were sponsored by donor box, outdated donation forms, blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor box.org. Here is the chronicle of philanthropy leaders. It’s a pleasure to welcome this week’s guests, Stacy Palmer is CEO of the chronicle of philanthropy. Andrew Simon. Is editor in chief of the chronicle of philanthropy. You’ll find them both on linkedin Stacy Andrew. Welcome to Nonprofit Radio. Thanks for inviting us. Thank you for having us, Tony. Absolute absolute pleasure. Um Stacy, I’d like to start with you. It’s been about 2.5 years. It was June of 2022. We last talked. Uh You had, you were making the transition or had made the transition from privately held company to nonprofit status. I, you were awaiting the IRS approval of the nonprofit status. That was June of 2022. Uh I know you’ve gotten that bring us up to date on the Chronicle of philanthropy as a nonprofit. Yeah. So we’ve been operating for 18 months as a nonprofit and every day we learn something new about what it takes to build an organization. And so I feel much closer to all of our readers and all of the challenges that they face, which I knew would happen as we sort of made this transition. But, you know, we’ve gotten through our first audit, we’re doing our 990 we’re doing all of those kinds of things and we’re really trying to figure out how do we re invent ourselves so that the Chronicle of philanthropy will be something that serves our audiences really well for decades to come. Uh What have you uh especially learned as a, as a CEO of a nonprofit. Go, go a little dive a little deeper into what it’s been, how much closer you feel to the audience now. Yeah. You know, I mean, I’m now actively doing fundraising. I’m working with a board, you know, all of the things that people would tell me, this is a challenge I face. This is something that’s wonderful. This is something that’s difficult. Now, I feel it viscerally every single day. Um, the biggest for us has been technology and how to make sure that we have systems that really help us, you know, show the audience, you know, all the things that they want. We have legacy systems. I think every nonprofit is facing those kinds of problems. Um And we need to make sure that we move as quickly as we can into new ways of serving our audiences. And that part, it’s just taken longer than I would have expected it to just because it’s complicated and it’s expensive. And so you need to figure out ways to do. But, you know, I think the really fun part for us is we often are asking ourselves, how do we think about serving the audience? What do they need without having to worry as much about, you know, what our for profit owners were thinking about and they were very generous and very wonderful, but they definitely needed to make sure we were making a profit. Now, we think about how do we plow that into more services to better serve non profits? That’s extremely freeing and that’s the part of the nonprofit world that I love. So it sounds like uh described as your program work you finding takes longer than you expected. Uh It’s costly, there’s fundraising against it. OK. Uh And you’ve described this as AAA period of transformation and growth. And uh how does, how does uh having hired uh Andrew as editor in chief fit with that? It absolutely enables it. Um Because he brings skills and perspectives that our newsroom didn’t have before. Um So why don’t we let him talk a little bit about his background so that you can all know what he brings to the chronicle of philanthropy? Ok. Let’s do it that way. I was going to actually ask you why did you hire Andrew Simon? But I’ll let him do it in the next Andrew Simon. Why do you believe you were hired? What, what, what, what have you brought? Well, you know, um in some of the early conversations with Stacy, we both talked about how the Chronicle can really serve audience by helping leaders see around the corner, right? Understanding the trends, understanding what’s happening now, philanthropy in the nonprofit world, but making sense of it and really helping to guide readers a little bit with our journalism and our reporting about um what to expect next. And in previous roles, I’ve been fascinated with this idea of how can we help readers and leaders see the future? I at a previous job. I was at a business consulting company. We’re uh doing stories on climate solutions. I, previous to that, I worked at gris.org, a nonprofit news site devoted to climate, climate solutions, climate justice and in both of those roles, it was similar, it was sort of making sense of the news now. And how does that help guide leaders in their decision making going forward? So I think Stacy and I were kind of uh excited about the prospect of doing more of that. The chronicle has certainly done that for years. But the idea of doing more of that and coming into this role is what really excited me. Well, what are some of the trends that you’re looking at? Uh We just, I mean, we just had a presidential election. I mean, that’s a, that’s a, that’s a wide open question. Uh But take, take it where you go and take it where you like. And, uh you know, we’ll, we’ll, we’ll drill down some, I see the post election world on a, on a few levels. There’s certainly helping leaders navigate the changes to tax policy and regulation. There are certainly the missions of many nonprofits um that could be under threat. So there’s that level, I, I also think there’s a, a hovering over all this is just uncertainty, really an unpredicted, potentially unpredictable time for leaders, whether you’re on the grant making side, whether you’re a nonprofit leader, whether you’re a fundraiser. And I’m wondering how we can help our leaders and readers navigate this uncertainty, right? So I feel like there’s uncertainty hovering over all of this, right? So you can raise questions about, well, will this mission be affected? What are the ramification of these tax policies regulation changes? Which is very important? But then how do you navigate the uncertainty going forward? The the chronicle has an interesting role I do. Is it fair to say that it, it’s an advocate for the nonprofit sector community or, or is it, is that, is that inappropriate? And it, it needs to remain neutral about it? It’s, it’s primary readership. Yeah, it’s a great question. And, you know, obviously we believe nonprofits are incredibly important to society or else we wouldn’t be in this business of covering and serving them and helping them do better. But we also raise questions when they’re not doing the kinds of things that society depends on them to do. So, you know, I, somebody once described us as the good friend who tells you when your slip is showing and it’s an awkward expression. But it’s sort of the right way to say, you know, I think, you know, it’s important to say that we care deeply about this sector. We think it’s horribly undercovered. We think that that’s one of the reasons it’s not as effective as it should be. We think people are terribly fragmented and it’s our role to connect people. Um You did an interesting blog post or talking about the fact that everyone needs to come together as a sector in this time when there are really big challenges. And, you know, we see already some of the things going on on Capitol Hill where there’s legislation, you know, that a lot of nonprofits are allied against those kinds of things where people need to come together and defend the rights of nonprofits to free speech and advocacy and those kinds of things. It’s really important for them to see themselves in, you know, the pages of our article so that they all know what’s happening. Some will agree, some will disagree, but at least they should be connected to each other to fact based information. So that’s what we’re trying to do. And I think another thing that we’re thinking a lot about um is how do we fix some of the systems that are broken about the nonprofit world. Um I will say that, you know, there’s been frustration forever about lack of operating support, lack of multi year grants. So we saw some of in the pandemic, we saw some changes there, but it seems like there’s a slide back on the very things nonprofits need. So in those kinds of ways, choosing that we’re going to talk about those things, you might consider that advocacy. But we think it’s just important for us to put a spotlight on things that otherwise wouldn’t get the attention. Like, like your slip is showing. Ok. Um, what about the, the mass media coverage? Um, I, I don’t know who’s better to answer this, but you have, you, have, you had at least maybe still do a fellowship program, training other journalists outside the community that, you know, we don’t exist only when there’s, uh, uh, uh, a $500 million fraud foisted on the people by a Veterans Affairs agency. You know, where do we stand on helping mass media better coverage better cover the sector? That’s a really important part of our mission. So every year we take on four newsrooms that we work with intensively over the year, we partner with people in our newsroom who can help them do an excellent job of learning how to cover the field. And we’re really trying to help them focus on, you know, who are the nonprofits and foundations that are serving their communities, what are they doing, what’s happening, what would happen if they disappeared? Um And to really better understand that. So, you know, to be sure some of the fellows we’ve done have found some fraud and abuse in their communities and they’ve reported on that, but we encourage them to look more deeply about what’s going on. Um And to show that, you know, one out of every 11 Americans works for a nonprofit that means that people who are reading their content listening um to them, if it’s, you know, on broadcast networks, you know, those are the kinds of folks that, you know, really want to understand how nonprofits work with the threat, sorry to them, what the opportunities are. Um And we should cover it just like we cover business or any other sector. So we try to argue that we would love to expand this program. So one of the things we hope as a nonprofit that we can do is draw ever more attention in this time when local journalism is suffering a great way to attract audiences is to cover nonprofits. That’s what readers and listeners and viewers all want to know about is who’s solving problems in their communities. And it’s the nonprofits Andrew then are these fellows working with you uh uh on the editorial side? Right. Well, they’re editor of fellows. So they, they certainly work in their respective newsrooms throughout the country. But what we do is our editors and writers will work with them, mentor them, review their stories, help them bring larger concepts to life. And then we also, as a matter of fact, I think we have one of these sessions today. I’m not mistaken as we record to where we’ll, we’ll have um we’ll share our expertise in a kind of learning session where we’ll, you know, share tips on investigative reporting or collecting data sets. Um and hopefully help guide the fellows in those types of ways I see. All right. So they, they remain in their, in their respective newsrooms Yeah. Ok. Ok. Um Yeah, data, I mean, there’s a, there’s a trove of data about the nonprofit sector that I, I think doesn’t get the attention that uh that, that folks, that journalists need to know uh about what’s out there, what the government collects, what, what some of the agencies collect. Yeah. So one of the fellows is actually working on a project to try to figure out where the most charitable cities are, which is a vexing thing to do. We’ve done those kinds of projects too, but the data is not ideal for being able to ask those questions. But we’re really trying to figure out what makes certain stand out. Why is there more philanthropy in them? And then on the flip side, why are there the philanthropy deserts? Um and what can be done about that? So, you know, that’s one of the ways that we’re training them to use data. And of course, we do the very basics like making sure everybody can, you know, glean information from the nine nineties, you know, make sure they really understand how to read them those very basic things. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money but also supports you in retaining your donors, a partner that helps you raise funds, both online and on location. So you can grow your impact faster. That’s donor box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers, just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability, your organization needs, helping you help others visit donor box.org to learn more. Now, back to the chronicle of philanthropy leaders, Andrew. I’d like to pull on the thread a little more about uh the uh the presidential election project 2025. I mean, there are, there are some nonprofits that are specifically named in the document like uh the like uh national Public Radio, uh public Broadcasting system PBS, you know, named, called out to be defunded. Um That Planned Parenthood should have its, um, it’s, it’s Medicaid funding withdrawn as long as they’re providing abortion care. Uh What, you know, what’s the, what’s the role of the Chronicle in, in making this clear? I don’t know, uh you know, playing the role of the good friend, but, you know, seeing that the, the, some of the, some of the, some of the good friends are uh, are under like explicit threat. Where, where is the Chronicle fit there? Sure. Well, it, it goes a little bit back to this theme of uncertainty and it’s not to say that some of these threats shouldn’t be taken seriously, aren’t real. But again, hard to know if and when some of these changes would happen, I think our role is to try to identify the ways in which nonprofits can stay financially healthy and stable. Again, through, through tough times, you know, it’s why we have multiple reporters dedicated to fundraising. It’s why we have uh multiple writers talking about leadership and, and navigating, you know, hard decisions um in volatile times like this, you know, not to say that is, um this is not perfectly analogous, but certainly there was uh COVID-19, you know, not that, that many years ago. And this was before I got to the Chronicle, but this was the newsroom coming together with our nonprofit intelligence team, which I know that’s a wonky title. But you know, that’s our uh unit that’s really devoted to um you know, helping uh leaders in, in a professional development capacity. So, you know, the team just got together and tried to again, help figure out, ok, under these um unprecedented, really challenging times, what should fundraisers consider, how do leaders navigate and lead their organization? What does the remote place uh workplace look like? So there will be certainly new challenges in this era. And again, it’s not to say that the next era is exactly like the Coronavirus era and yet these could be challenging volatile times. And I think there are certain themes that we can cover that should be able to apply to most nonprofits. Not all, one of my big reflections of this role so far is the variation in size and scope and mission of nonprofits is so vast that we, we do, we are thoughtful and need to continue to be thoughtful about not offering one size all fit solutions that we do need to gear our coverage um around just, you know, as best we can on that huge variation of nonprofits. But nonetheless, we are looking for trends and things that again, we think should be of interest to at least the majority of the readership. Do we have? Uh I’m saying we, I’m a, I’m a, I’m a member of the Chronicle philanthropy. Uh Is there a Washington DC reporter? Are we able to cover what’s, you know, what’s happening around, you know, discussions around the, the, the sector in, in Washington, you know, we started off being based here. Um And so for many, many years when we were under the Chronicle of higher Education, all the reporters worked from the Washington DC area. Um we had a couple that, you know, were able to be in other places, but for the most part, we were all here. So we start with a really strong base of covering Washington. I will say though that there was a point where I had a lot of the reporters focused on Capitol Hill and the White House, the IRS doing all those kinds of things. Um And so there would be different people assigned to all of those things, but as the federal government sort of pulled back on doing very much that was interesting um for nonprofits writ large, some of, and I would assign the best reporters to those tweets and they would come up to me and say there’s not enough to cover. Can I please have something else to cover in addition to covering what’s going on in terms of policy? So, we’re, you know, in one of those pendulum shifts now where we’re going back to the people who had the expertise in covering it. But, and I think now we’re really, you know, given some of the things that, um, you know, the Trump administration that JD Vance has said about, you know, where nonprofits are going to be, you know, in the sights of possible legislation. We’re in a heavy period and I’m thrilled that we have expertise that people cultivated long ago. Um, but it really does come sort of in and out and I think where we also need to pay a lot of attention to is, you know, state and local politics is going to become even more important and that’s an area where, because we’re small, we haven’t spent as much time. So I think that’s one of the areas where we’re going to need to grow. Iiii I see the need. Um, and, yeah, I hadn’t even thought of right state and local. I mean, the, um, so much, you know, is being pushed down to the States. Uh, and, and, and a lot of issues, um, I’m concerned, you know, I’m, I’m, I just personally and professionally, I’m, I’m concerned about our sector and, and, and pieces of it. That have missions that are, uh, in the sights of, you know, and I think it goes beyond 20 25. Yeah, it goes beyond that, you know, so, regardless of what your politics are and what you care about the missions, the fact that we’re talking about pretty serious federal budget cuts of any kind. I mean, nonprofits get more of their revenue from government than they do from anything else. And so, you know, I think that if any of those things go through the sector could be in a pretty difficult period. So that’s especially the way we’re watching it is, you know, um not even just, you know, obviously there are particular missions that are in the target, but really anybody that gets funding from government entities could be at risk financially. So that’s why when Andrew was talking about helping navigate uncertainty, make sure people know how to lead and fundraise. It’s in incredibly important. Um We were founded soon after the Reagan administration was leaving office and that was a time when there was a burst in professional fundraisers being developed because there were all kinds of budget cuts and organizations needed to double down on their private fundraising. So I, and that will never make up for how much the government provides, but it’s going to be crucial in these next few years, I think. Uh So what am I missing Stacy? I mean, uh when I see the giving usa report each year, it’s like, uh individual giving is 75 or 76% of, of overall giving to nonprofits. But you’re saying government, that’s just private giving. If you look at the budgets of nonprofits, you look at like the Urban Institute kind of study. So colleges, hospitals, social service agencies, that overall budget shows that most of the finances um are through some kind of a government subsidy and people don’t think about it that way. We think of nonprofits and we think of the private giving side and that, that’s usually important and some groups, you know, that’s 90% of their income, but for others it’s a much smaller portion. Ok, thank you. All right. All right. Um All right. Maybe a little lighter, uh, a little lighter topic. Uh What about, uh, what, what, what are we gonna be seeing priority wise in terms of, uh, other content? We webinars podcasts? I don’t know, Andrew. Is that on the editorial side or, or is that not? I don’t know, or? Yeah, I, I can certainly speak to multimedia and, you know, Stacey might be able to talk a little bit more about, um, you know, webinars and, and, and in that unit, um, we’re, we’re excited about meeting readers where they are. You know, I think Stacey already alluded to the fact that, you know, yes, there are some challenges as we transition to being an independent nonprofit organization, but with that comes opportunity. So it’s interesting, we had a discussion yesterday among the leadership team. And it’s sort of like we, we know we want to use different multimedia tools and channels to reach our audience. But we also want to become more sophisticated on understanding of, you know, what are the tools that will reach them most effectively? Right. You know, is there a hunger for podcast? Is there a hunger for short social videos? Right. So there’s a sort of a measure of work of saying, yeah, we, we want to meet readers where they are, but how do we do that? And one of the most effective ways we can reach readers in that way. So it is exciting though. We, we do have hopefully, I can say this publicly. We do have a podcast underway which Stacey might be able to talk a little bit more about uh which we’re extremely thrilled about. We have begun experimenting a bit more video, particularly on social media. We have a terrific um social media manager who is really willing to experiment and guide us in those ways. We, we want to do some small things or things that seem small as uh for example, have our writers just, you know, go on camera and talk for 60 seconds about uh the great reporting that they do. It’s something that other publications do. So I think it’s sort of starting kind of seemingly modestly in these ways and experimenting again, seeing what resonates with our audience and then hopefully leaning in more uh to what we learned is effective. I had the honor of uh hosting fundraising fundamentals for the Chronicle for about five years. Uh when back when uh Peter Pena Pinto was your web editor, Stacy. And uh that, that was always fun. A little short form, uh short form podcasting 10 minutes every two weeks or maybe once a month. It’s time for Tony’s take two. Thank you, Kate. You would have thought that last week, I would have said, uh Happy Thanksgiving. That’s a pretty natural thing to say during the week of Thanksgiving. But uh I didn’t, I didn’t say it because I didn’t think of it because we record the week before when you have a lackluster host. This is what you end up with a late Happy Thanksgiving holiday. Wish you deserve better. I, you do. You do iii I wish the host was better. We’re stuck with lackluster. I hope you enjoyed your Thanksgiving took some time for yourself. Time to relax, rejuvenate. So there’s a whole fourth quarter coming up. Well, we’re in the midst of the fourth quarter, the, the tail end of the fourth quarter coming up. I hope you took some time for yourself, your family, your friends, Happy Thanksgiving late. That is Tony’s take two Kate. We hope you enjoy your turkey. Well, we’ve got bookoo, but loads more time. Here’s the rest of the chronicle of philanthropy leaders with Stacy Palmer and Andrew Simon. What about, um you know, professional development opportunities through the, through the chronicle? What, what, what do you see there? Yeah, that’s a really important part of what we do and we see our role as in very much helping nonprofits do their jobs better. A lot of our webinars focus on fundraising, but we’re branching out into doing more things on leadership. The podcast that Andrew mentioned is going to be focused on leadership and gonna talk to terrific leaders about the ways that they overcome the challenges that they face. Um And I’m eager to have listeners of this podcast, um share any ideas and thoughts about both topics and guests and those kinds of things as we feature them. Um So I would say the next big area that we’ll get into, you know, has to do more with leadership. We’re really concerned about the fact that, you know, we did a survey that found that a lot nonprofit leaders love their jobs, but they’re really frustrated in them. And, you know, many of them are planning to leave their roles um in the next two or three years and about a third of them are thinking about leaving the sector altogether. That’s a brain drain we can’t afford right now. We need to groom more leaders. Um I’ve talked to people who say that they offer, you know, co leadership opportunities sometimes to younger colleagues and the younger colleagues. Look at them and I would never want that job. Why would you think that anybody would want that job? It’s not a good job. Um You know, that’s really damaging to the sector when great talent doesn’t even think that leadership um of a nonprofit is the kind of role they want to take. So we see ourselves as helping to deal with that problem. So I think you’ll see a lot more from us on that topic, Andrew, you reported on that the leadership transition. I think it was just earlier this month. Can you uh can you pull on that a little more? Talk about the, the next generation and, and the exodus of uh the uh the, the existing. Sure, absolutely. Yeah, we had a, a writer, Alex Daniels um do a recent cover story on the uh transition at many foundations in leadership and it, it’s, it there, we’re, we’re in a moment of change. It’s, it’s pretty indisputable, right? Whether it’s uh J PB, the Ford Foundation, Hewlett um um foundations of that size. And then, you know, other foundations too that may not be um kind of quite as uh reputable as those, but still um really important foundations in the space. And, yeah, what Alex realized in his reporting is that this next generation of leaders, um they’re often um people coming directly from the nonprofit world, right? They’re not necessarily coming from academia or the corporate sector. So they’ve uh lived the daily lives of what it’s like to lead a nonprofit and work in a nonprofit. Uh They’re often women, they’re often people of color, women of color, um which also represents a shift, um just in the demographic, but also in the ideas. Um and the innovation that they could bring to, to some of these entities. So it really feels like a big moment of change and it, it speaks to something I’m really interested in as I’ve gotten into this role is as we alluded to earlier about kind of seeing to the the future, I think even outside of foundation leadership, you know, what is the future of the sector, who, who’s going to be calling the shots, what, what are the biggest challenges they are facing, right? Where, what are their, what are their work back, work backgrounds look like? As Stacey just mentioned, um how does the sector prevent burnout? Right? How does the sector support these leaders? And again, now going into an era of potentially more unpredictability, um How does this next generation kind of thrive? Um And, and not, you know, meet um some seeming insurmountable challenges. I think the burnout is real and some of the other things that Stacy mentioned. So, um I, I would say it’s personally exciting that that shift is really exciting, but there are real challenges that um these young leaders will have to confront. It’s an interesting tension, you know, with the election is based on, you know, make us great again. We’re going backwards to some, some time that’s undefined and, you know, I don’t know how many decades or generations back, but yet we’re talking about a new generation of leadership, uh you know, looking, looking forward. Uh II, I see some, II, I see a tension there. I don’t know, maybe that’s just a, a general, you know, uh rather concern of the community. But I don’t know. I, I see tension between moving backwards and looking forward. I think there are some nonprofit leaders who having been through the first time Trump was elected and all the, you know, having survived the pandemic, um they were already pretty worn out. And so this idea of going through it again, that’s why I’m really worried about the number of departures that we’re seeing. Um So, you know, one of the things that we found in our survey too is that, you know, the problems of polarization is what’s really hitting nonprofits hard. You know, it used to be that when you ask people what their problems were, it was about, you know, making their budgets, raising enough money, worrying about their staffs and those are still big problems, but now they’re really trying to figure out how to deal with a divided country, sometimes divided workplaces. Um So that’s just added another challenge to a nonprofit leader’s job. What else should we talk about that? I, that I, uh I haven’t asked you about what, what, what does, what do you want to share about, uh the, the chronicle going forward the transition, please? I, I can’t, I can’t anticipate everything. No. You know, I want to go back to a question you asked earlier because I, it, I think it was a two part question. I think you were asking sort of, what do you see coming down the road, both related to the election results and, and maybe not so much. So, I feel like I answered the first part, but not the second part. Um There are trends and shifts in the sector that are really interesting um that we uh we, we’ve been covering already, but we’ll continue to cover. So, and some may be related to the administration but not so much, you know, for example, uh technology and A I and what are nonprofits learning about the technologies? Right? There’s a lot of hope. There’s a lot of promise. There’s a lot of excitement, there’s a lot of really interesting applications uh you know, from fundraising to uh organizational efficiency in operations. Um But then there, there’s fear which is just a um there’s risks. Uh So how do nonprofits navigate A I and other technologies too? For example, cybersecurity, right? So, uh that, that is a thread and a and a story we’ll be covering. Um There’s certainly the, the future of race-based grant making and de I efforts at nonprofits. This one does feel like it could be, you know, tied to again this next e whether or not it’s a threat to the administration or not, but certainly in this, in this new world that we’re in. Um what does that, what does that look like? Right. If, if you’re a nonprofit and you’re say, working specifically uh in a sector where you’re helping uh to uh support um marginalized groups, uh people of color, what does that look like? What if you’re an entity who’s interested in supporting your own de I efforts? And yet it feels like maybe the funding um is starting to dry up from grant makers in that area because of the de I backlash, you know, that, that is a real issue and storyline that um again, I think, you know, multiple nonprofits will be confronting. I also think it’s, and I’m learning more about this as I learn more about the sector, but the effect of Melinda French Gates and Mackenzie Scott, right? This their uh their unrestricted giving. Um I think with Mackenzie Scott a little bit more mystery in terms of um the process there with Melinda French Gates uh really leading into uh gender equity, women leadership. It, it’s all really fascinating to have these two high stakes players who have really burst onto the scene. Uh We know our readers are really interested in their moves. We have the, we have the receipts to show it and it’s for good reason, you know, they’re they’re really two power players in the space right now. So there’s, there’s, there’s, there’s something interesting emerging there both with respect to their approach to giving and how they give and then also following the issue areas and in the missions in terms of where their dollars go. Yeah, I think what’s so exciting about watching them is, you know, for years and years and years we’ve had covers that say, you know, philanthropy is not paying enough attention to women donors, where are the women donors? Are they going to start giving it a big way? Um And so many women have been influenced by what they’re seeing from Mackenzie and Melinda and Melinda Gate. It has also made deliberate attempts to make sure that other women are giving. Um and, you know, doing matching grants and other kinds of things. So I think we’re going to see a really big new era in which women play a much more important role in big philanthropy. So that should shift things um in a really fascinating way for us to watch. That’s interesting, Stacey. So women uh non billionaire women are feeling empowered by the Mackenzie Scott and uh and French Gates work. Absolutely. Um you know, and you know, one of the things that Linda French Gates did was offer some matching grants to women who are affluent. Um and you know, encourage them that if they channeled more of their giving to women’s causes, she would match it. Well, that kind of thing unlocks a lot of interest because all of a sudden women would say, wait a minute, there’s somebody else who thinks that these causes really matter. I think we all know the role model effect is incredibly important in philanthropy. Um So, you know, seeing that people are doing things, seeing how they can change the world through their gifts um is incredibly important. So we shouldn’t look at it just as you know, the billions of dollars that Mackenzie and Melinda have even though they’re huge, but it’s their impact on. There are women that, you know, is incredibly important. And we also know from the research that women influence um more than men, you know, what the Children in the family do and usually men listen to what the women in the family are saying about the causes that they want to give to and those kinds of things. So, you know, I think this movement is going to have a lot of ripple effects. Andrew. Uh Well, first, thank you for answering the second half of my question which I I obliterated and forgot about. So um that’s, I’m, I’m a podcaster and not a journalist. Uh What say, say a little more with you about uh artificial intelligence. We, we’ve had several shows on this. We’ve had folks from uh N 10 like Amy Sample Ward and, but also authors like Afua Bruce. Um You know what, say a little more about what, what, what you’re, what you’re looking at, what, what, what you’re thinking about around, uh, around A I and nonprofits. Sure. Uh, the first thing I would say is, uh, for those who are listening, please do follow the work of Sarah Hian Rashida Childress. They, they are two of our reporters who’ve been, um, covering a, I pretty closely, at least in recent months and I’m sure we’ve had reporters, um, before I got here on that beat as well. Um It’s, you know, it’s been interesting again, in certain cases, some of the technology companies have been directly trying to, you know, I think with seemingly with the right intentions, help, you know, support and underwrite um A I experimentation with nonprofits, right? So that does feed again some hope and optimism that A I can help uh certain nonprofits operate more efficiently, uh innovate. So there’s excitement there. But as I alluded to before there, there are the risks that come with A I, there’s that it, it’s not a perfect technology yet. So I think that’s an interesting tension too, right? That uh where we have technology companies and those who are creating the technology, you know, really uh encouraging it, the use of it for nonprofits and the implications there. And then on the fundraising side, there was a recent story about an A I fundraiser, you know, to the point where there is an avatar that uh a potential donor sees and is interacting with and helps them guide, helps guide them through the note to the donation process. And there’s just something that’s interesting and wacky and even a little scary about that. Right. And yet is this where we’re going with fundraising? Is this where nonprofits are gonna go? Will this be the future? I think it’s a question at this point but a fascinating one as a, as a over the top, uh, relationship uh fundraiser II I it’s, it’s hard. It’s a question. I know you’re, you’re not answering, you’re asking, you’re asking a question, but even the question hurts me. Uh uh And I work, I work in Planned Giving so I work with uh folks in their mostly seventies, eighties and nineties, you know, and uh the thought of them being guided by, uh I don’t know, fundraising avatar is, uh I mean, these are folks writing checks, you know, and not, not even, not even credit, they don’t trust online even, you know, just a simple, putting my credit card in an, in a, in an online form. Um All right. Anything else that uh you wanna leave us with either of you? I would say a word about the commons and that body of work that it’s a, it’s a project that started uh back in April and a lot of credit to Stacy Palmer, senior editor Drew Lindsay and others on the team for getting it off the ground and the intention of the commons. It was really for the chronicle to take a close look at polarization. Philanthropy’s role in it both in uh the solutions that are available. But also has philanthropy been detrimental has been causing and ceding polarization in in any way. So really asking some hard questions around again, Philanthropy’s role in in polarization but also talking about ideas and solutions and what’s happening that is helping to bridge divides. And in this current moment, we’re hoping that it really provides value to our, to our readers, right? That it, I mean, say so you feel free to chime in here back when you launched the commons. I I imagine there was thinking about, well, what does an ex administration like, what does A Y administration look like? And then also the calculus are being we might have been facing polarization regardless of, of the election outcome. And certainly here we are and I’m sure our readers are, are reading about this notion of a resistance. And uh there are really, there are real questions around, you know, will funders support um a resistance. I say that in quotation marks, I mean, some are using that word, some are maybe not using that word will some be a little more hesitant to fund a resistance. I think there’s some emotional drain right now from, from some members of the resistance. So there are just some fascinating questions about democracy efforts, polarization efforts. Will they continue to receive support and yet the the vibe for lack of a better word is that it’s still tense right now. I don’t know that polarization is going away anytime soon. So I I just would encourage readers to not just follow the comments but contribute ideas, you know, write us notes, tell us what you think. We received a, a really interesting letter in our, one of our first post election reaction pieces, which wasn’t so specifically about the comments, but I think it captures the spirit of the comments where our election, one of our election reaction pieces had the terminology was progressive. Nonprofits are, you know, really terrified because of the results and conservative ones are celebrating. And there was this powerful short letter from a nonprofit leader saying, I don’t know, I, I don’t call myself progressive and I don’t call myself um conservative either, right? That there, there are, there are organizations working somewhere in between and what, what does the election mean for us? You know, we, we, we’re, we’re sort of feeling a little nervy too and yet I wouldn’t call our mission progressive per se. So it’s just, it’s a long way of saying that I think polarization it, it’s here. Um It’s vexing for I think both grant makers and nonprofits and we’re here to hopefully help uh leaders, you know, guide them through it. What’s the structure of the commons? I, is that something folks can participate in or I’m not familiar with it. So it’s a special section on our website um that you can see on the navigation bar that collects all of the opinion articles, deeply reported pieces. We do something called linkedin Commons in conversation. You know, right after the election, I talked to Joel Goldman, the head of Democracy Fund who’s working on these issues. Um Right after Thanksgiving, I’ll be talking to Judy Rudoff about the series that she’s been doing America at a crossroads. So, you know, we have all kinds of things happening in the commons focused on this issue of, you know, how can nonprofits play a role in healing divides of all kinds, not just politics, geography, race, gender, age, all of the things that are dividing this country. And when we started the comments, we knew that, you know, it was a little bit dangerous to launch it in April only because we were afraid that it would suggest that it was just a project for the election. We knew this country is so divided that this is going to be a very long term effort. Um And nonprofits and foundations need to work on. So we’re committed to doing that. We very much welcome ideas from the audience. Um There’s a linkedin newsletter that people can sign up for in addition to a special edition once a week that comes out in our philanthropy today newsletter. Um All of that is available free to people to be able to sign up for um and circulate. But that’s, I think an expression of how we see ourselves as a nonprofit now that we’re more actively engaged in tackling some of the big problems that are facing the field and saying here are the tools and solutions to deal with them. So, you know, what we’re looking at too is, you know, what is the next comments? What is the other topics that will go into um with a deep dive? Um So we welcome suggestions on that too. And if our listeners want to make suggestions, where do they do that? Um Best thing is to write to Andrew or to me, um I’ll give my email address first. I’m Stacy dot Palmer at philanthropy.com, Andrew dot Simon at philanthropy.com. And then we also have a, a general letter to the editor type inbox. It’s editor mail at philanthropy.com. So any of those places are great. Ok. We have direct lines to the uh to the CEO and the editor in chief. All right, I want to thank you both. Thanks very much. Thank you so much for your interest. We appreciate it and for all the work you do for the sector. Oh, it’s, it’s, it’s a pleasure. Uh uh a labor of love. Next week, the art and science of fundraising with James Meisner. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you find it at Tony martignetti.com were sponsored by donor box. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor. Box.org. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martignetti. The show social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that Apple mission Scotty be with us next week for nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95% go out and be great.
That’s David Rhode’s new book. “It’s necessary, but not sufficient,” says the author. He brings us his practical advice on building your programs, your board, your brand, your team and your volunteer community. His expertise has value for aspiring, new and experienced nonprofit leaders alike. David is CEO of DotDotOrg.com.
Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
Hello and welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite abdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d suffer the embarrassment of tinnitus if I had to hear that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate with what’s going on this week? Hey, Tony, we’ve got passion isn’t enough. That’s David Rhodes. New book. It’s necessary but not sufficient says the author, he brings us his practical advice on building your programs, your board, your brand, your team and your volunteer community. His expertise has value for aspiring new and experienced nonprofit leaders alike. David is CEO of dot dot org.com on Tony’s Take two tales from the plane, talking to your roommates were sponsored by donor box, outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor. Box.org here is passion isn’t enough. It’s a pleasure to welcome David Rode to nonprofit radio. He is the founder of dot dot org, a nonprofit consulting firm focused on ceo mentoring. He teaches nonprofit branding and nonprofit consulting at the University of Pennsylvania. He’s the author of the book Passion Isn’t enough, a practical guide for nonprofit leaders, which is what brings him to the show today. His company is at dot dot org.com and you’ll find David on linkedin. David. Welcome to nonprofit radio, Tony. I’m delighted to be here. We are both delighted to be at the Serafina Restaurant on the 77th in Columbus because you know, any Schmo podcaster can record his podcast on Zoom as I do week after week. But only the uh exemplary podcast hosts are gonna actually meet the guest. Uh where, where around the corner, uh a block and a half, you came. So, you know, there’s the expression, you meet people where they are, you literally came to meet me where I am. I did it. I’m glad I’m walking the walk. All right. So I’m in New York City. Uh visiting uh doing some work. David lives here on the Upper West side. So we are at Serafina. Cheers, cheers. Congratulations on your book. Thanks so much. We’re excited. We’re both drinking uh sauvignon blanc today. So let’s turn the title of the book into a question. Why isn’t uh passion enough? Passion isn’t enough? Because while passion may be necessary to bring you into the non profit sector or to help you launch an organization, the skills that you need to run this business and nonprofit organizations are businesses. It requires you to have a range of skills covering a range of areas. So passion can be one of the elements that’s necessary to be successful within the non profit sector, but it’s not sufficient. There’s so much more to the role and there’s so much more to being successful long term. OK. So fair to say necessary, necessary because of, because of everything you’re gonna, you’re gonna sacrifice to do this work most likely but, but not sufficient. Ok? Uh Tell the story of, uh, pitching for baseball and softball because a lot of what you share in the book. Uh, you have a lot of advice from others as well, but a lot of your advice, I it sounds like comes from your experience leading pitching for baseball and softball. Yeah, I mean, my, my experience ranges from, from my time there to also all the other client interactions I’ve had. But yes, fundamentally, uh I founded a nonprofit organization in 2005. I had a lot of confidence in myself as a leader, but I was new to the nonprofit sector and pitching for baseball and softball, really sort of blended with my personality. I’m a sports person. I was coaching my two boys in baseball at the time and I realized that, you know, all of the equipment that they would acquire and then grow out of maybe there’s a better use for it than sitting in the corner of our garage or in a closet. So the whole premise of the organization was based on seeing if we could collect and redistribute new and gently used equipment so that kids in under resourced communities, both here and around the world could gain access to the game. And the organization grew and thrived, it thrived for a lot of reasons. We had a really clear idea of who we were a strong brand. We really relied heavily on strategic partnerships with major league baseball teams and equipment manufacturers, all those things for years and years to develop. But at the end of the day, the organization really had a meaningful impact helping over a million kids in over 100 countries around the world. So really proud of the time I spent there. You evolved into disaster relief too because we’re gonna talk a little about uh a little about you. We’re gonna talk a fair amount about programs and maybe expanding programs but, but not getting carried away with that. But you, you did move into disaster relief. Well, the, the organization was actually born right around the time of hurricane Katrina and this is in some of the first work we did not by design, but just the way the world worked. Um Our first board meeting was in late September of 2005 and, and hurricane Katrina struck, I think August 31st of that year. So we found ourselves in a moment where it’s like, well, yes, we envision helping people all around the world. But the people that need the most help right now are in the Gulf coast region of our own country. So we quickly shifted our focus and learned how, what was a very simple idea of providing baseball and softball equipment could be really not just helpful for kids to play but provided this real sense of healing for a community, getting kids back to doing something that they found was normal to do. And that really defied our organization in many ways. Almost 15 years. I was with the organization disaster relief programs, you know, Hurricane Sandy here in the New York area. This is some of the most important work we did and things that we became known for. We were the Red Cross of baseball, one group tabbed us and we wore that Monica really proudly. We were really happy to play our small part in helping communities recover from natural disasters. I’m a little intimidated. Uh, when you say you’re a sports guy because I’m, I’m not well skilled in sports, softball and baseball are those the ones that have field goals? Uh, is that softball and baseball they can, but only, only if things go really poorly. All right. So that’s a, that’s, you’re being, uh, you’re being kind, in other words, no, there’s no field goals. That’s a, that’s a hard, no. All right, we’ll try. All right. Baseball is that the one that has the Super series at the end of the, uh Well, there’s a World Series. It’s not super, what’s the Super Super Bowl is the end of the football season? Oh, it’s not, there’s not who has the Super Series. Nobody? Super Series. Nothing I’m aware of. I mean, I, I can’t speak to every sport, Tony. And again, I’m not from North Carolina. I don’t know what goes on down. I don’t know what. Now, this is a long standing. This is a long standing belief I had, I thought that I thought it to the end of some season. It’s not hockey. It’s the Super series. That’s the Stanley Cup. Oh, the Stanley series. Oh, the Stanley Cup. All right. All right. Well, so, so like I said, I’m intimidated. May. Maybe, maybe we’ll keep the sports metaphors to, uh we should, we’ll just keep doing stick to white wine and, and non blanc and non. All right. No sports. All right. Uh Even though it’s your origin story, uh here I am dismissing it as no sports. No, but you, you told the story. All right. So the book, the book is, uh I found valuable. There are 16 chapters, but we cannot even broach uh half of them, but I wanna give the book its due and I’m not gonna put you on the spot and ask you to recite by memory the 16 chapters because I didn’t, I, you asked me what to bring and I didn’t say bring your book. So I will uh I will give you the uh share with listeners the 16 chapters, they’re all around. It’s building your strategic plan, board, fundraising strategy, partnership, portfolio, financial controls programs, which we’re gonna talk about evidence based brand, which we’re gonna talk about communication strategy A I capabilities team. We’re gonna talk about diverse organization, volunteer, community, building your crisis response, your exit strategy, and then you have advice for new leaders. Does that sound familiar? Does that sound, that sounds like a book that I’ve recently had played a major role? That is the right book for the right? All right. Um Some of these things we have talked about recently, like Strategic Plan. I’ve had guests on two or three guests just in the past month or six weeks talking about strategic plan. So that’s why we’re skipping some of these. And plus we just have so much time together. People want the full value of the book. They’re just, they’re just gonna have to buy the book. Passion isn’t enough. All right, but we are gonna talk about building your programs. You have advice around uh quality over quantity being persistent, flush out your, your thinking around building your programs. Well, I I think there’s a lot of pressure on leaders and organizations to grow and expand. And I think that that’s a, it’s an important dynamic to think about growth but, but measured growth, I think is very important. I think it’s really important to prove what you have to refine what you have before you begin to expand and replicate your model. And sometimes people get, maybe the expression is a little out over their skis. They, they, they try to, they’re so worried about scale and helping more and more people that they, that they don’t focus enough on getting the actual programming, right? And that programming is in part, you know, identifying what you do. And it’s also then the measurement and evaluation that goes along with it, how do you know that your program is working? And so I think it’s really important to kind of know who you are and not spread yourself too thin. And again, we’re talking about organizations maybe in the earlier days, sorting themselves out and, and figuring out what they’re really good at. And so I think quality over quantity just means trying to really understand what is the unique impact you’re gonna have on the community. What is the unique impact you’re gonna have with the target population you’re trying to serve and, and how can you do that? And how can you do it better than everybody else that’s out there, there’s almost 1.8 million nonprofit organizations in the United States. And many of them have similar missions. They’re in the same sector, the same space, same geography. And so it’s important to sort of differentiate yourself and figure out what do you do best, what should people think of when they think of your organization and I think that comes down to your program and we’ll talk about brand in a little while, but, you know, really understanding who you are understanding what you’re good at. So how do you resist the pressure though, to do, to do more? It may come from your board, it may come from the community, uh your staff, you know, wherever, wherever the origin is, how do you resist helping more folks who need help? And it’s just a little bit maybe just an increment from what we, what we, what we originally originally are doing. It’s not that much of a stretch. It’s closely related. How do you avoid that? We’re here in Manhattan. We should be able to go to Brooklyn or we should be able to go to Queens or we should be able to go to wherever these are natural conversations and every board and every organization should have them. And I’m not saying that help more people. I’m saying make sure that you have the infrastructure and the resources and all of your ducks in a row before you start doing that. So it’s a natural progression to help more people. It’s a natural desire to help more people. That’s why most of us got into this business helping people. But, you know, we want to make sure that and organizations typically have very limit resources. So both, both people and money. So you want to make sure that those dollars are being used wisely and this is not meant to say that growth is bad. I’m just saying, make sure that you, you kind of have a smart plan that you know where you’re going, you know why you’re going there and that the programs that you’re and and the dynamics that are present that are making you successful in, in maybe one community or within one program are going to be present as you continue to expand that so that you can deliver the same quality, the same impact that you’ve achieved initially, it’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money but also supports you in retaining your donors, a partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location. So you can grow your impact faster. That’s donor box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs, helping you help others visit donor box.org to learn more. Now, back to passion isn’t enough. Let’s talk about assessment, then you, you mentioned it in passing, but let, let’s let’s drill down on identifying what the metrics are for uh for your, for your program. So you know what kind of success you’re meeting or if you’re not, right? So if you’re not being as successful as you are, so measurement and evaluation is an aspect of the nonprofit sector, which is growing in importance. It’s been on a trend in that direction for years and years and it’s not going to go away and it shouldn’t. Um The reason you want to measure your work is really two fold. One is first and foremost to prove that this, the people that you’re trying to impact are being impacted the way that you intend. How can you demonstrate that? How could you know that if you’re trying to attract a donor or if you’re trying to tell your story, you can’t just say, trust me, we’re doing great work. You need to be able to demonstrate the kids that we’re helping are going to college at a higher rate and we can show you the kids are reading at a higher rate. People are being retrained in their jobs and more successful, more sustained, more independent as a result of whatever, whatever the sector that you’re in. So the good news when it comes to measurement evaluation is, it’s very idiosyncratic. There’s no standard that says you have to measure it this way, you can measure it in a way that really is right for your organization. So there’s a, I’m a big fan of sort of right sizing measurement and evaluation. You may help 5000 kids with your program. You don’t have to measure all 5000 kids to prove that your program is working, choose a cohort, a group that represents the others in some meaningful way and then measure them. So what does measurement look like? Measurement fundamentally means you have to measure this group of individuals before they enter your program. And then you have to use the same device, same measurement device and see how they’re doing along whatever dynamics you’re trying to capture after they’ve been through your program. So it’s a before and after component and therefore you can measure the change that your program uh help, help demonstrate, help create. Uh and so those dynamics of a pre and post measurement and using the same instrument in the beginning and at the end are sort of some of the fundamentals of, of sort of research and research design. Um And then it’s really ties back to your theory of change. Maybe also, let me just insert, maybe also having a control group. Well, a really a similar cohort that does not go through your, didn’t go through your program in an ideal world. Yes. But, but realistically, that’s gonna be difficult to come up with in the nonprofit sector. And again, how are we gonna find a control group? What we’re? And I think there’s a little bit of an understanding that if we can talk to funders and people and say we’ve measured this group of people and this is the way we measure them. They’re not holding us to the standard of a control group. This isn’t the same as some other types of research which require that, let’s say medical, you’re trying, you’re trying to get a new drug through the whatever you’re trying to show some cure rate, you have to have a control group. We’re in the nonprofit sector. People understand that the amount of resources we have to measure and evaluate things is not to that level. So while a control group would be ideal and maybe there are schools in your community that are not part of your program and you’re helping kids in school. B and there’s a school a that’s across the street that draws from the same population. And you can somehow measure college success rates within that school versus your school and, and things of that nature. That would be great. All I’m, I’m being a little too sophisticated. You’re not being too sophisticated. It’s the right thought. But I, I think, I think at the fundamental level, we have to try to measure our people in a thoughtful way and we should tie it back to our theory of change. So your listeners are sophisticated nonprofit professionals. But in your theory of change, you’re trying to say, you know, we want people to become more resilient so that they can do X and Y and Z. OK. So then you have to measure resilience um or you’re trying to increase reading levels so that this and then you have to measure reading levels. So like each of the, each of the organizations are, are, have the freedom to measure what is necessary for them. Not just in terms of outputs, we, we’re reading at a better level, but then long term impact would be things like are able to attend college at a higher rate and things of that nature. So it’s, it’s important for people to be rigorous about measurement. Um And think about it from day one, not, not after I’ve been in this nonprofit sector for years and years, I really encourage people to begin to think about measurement. You know, at the earliest moments of the organization, how are we going to prove to others that our organization is having the desired impact? And it’s very challenging. Most organizations really struggle with this but start at the outset so that you can, you can see progress, you know, year one metrics are not gonna presumably not going to be as strong and positive as your year two. That’s right. And if you’ve been working with a group of kids for a number of years, starting to measure them in year three really is not a deal. So maybe that you’ve figured out your programs. But now instead of being in school one, you’ve added schools two and three to your program. Great. Now those schools are new to your program, measure those kids before they start with your program and track them along because the kids that are in school one, they’ve already been with you for a couple of years. They’ve already been seeing the positive effects of your program and, and you’re not getting a pure read on, on how you’ve been able to alter their trajectory, whatever their origin. That’s right. So it’s really important to kind of identify a group of people and be able to measure them before they come into contact with your programs and then measure them after they’ve had whatever that cycle of programming is. And, and ideally, you measure them longitudinally meaning over time. So it’s not just six months after, but maybe 12 months after or two years after three years after. So you can continue to measure their progress and see the long term effect. Anything else you want to share about the programs before we move on? Let’s keep rolling. OK, we’re good. All right, I’m gonna take a sip. I’m, I’m a little ahead of you with the wine. You wanna, you wanna take a sip? You’re all right. I’m gonna catch out. OK. OK. No pressure. All right. Building your brand. This is um as I said, one of the many chapters building, building your, building your brand. Let’s identify it first. Ho how do you define brand? A brand is sort of the totality of the thoughts, feelings, emotions that you might have when you think about something. So if you think about Starbucks, you might think about the music, you might think about the pricing, you might think about the coffee, you might think about the the, the service or the amount of time it takes for you or the noise or you might think about their position on a social issue, like fair trade for acquiring their coffee beans or you might think about their green sign. So it’s the mistake people make when they think about the brand is they tend to equate it with the logo of the organization and the, the visual identity of an organization is part of your, it’s, it’s a part of it, but it’s, it’s a small part of it. And in the nonprofit sector, it’s an increasing and that’s just the visual identity too. The brand is your, your values are part of your brand. That’s exactly right. So in the nonprofit, we’re not Coca Cola, we don’t have, we don’t have hundreds of millions of dollars that we’re spending on, on marketing for the typical nonprofit organization. In fact, most of the smaller organizations will spend zero on marketing. So, you know, your visual identity, they might see it on, on your website or they may see it on a T shirt, but they’re not, they’re not being blasted with it. So it has it, it’s kind of a smaller piece of the puzzle. So the brand is really, you know how people think about you and, and, and this is really, it’s sort of the essence of your organization and it’s not easy to always put your finger on it. The mistake organizations can sometimes make is, they think they, as maybe the executive director or a board member knows what the brand is and they, they, they have a sense of what the brand is. But the, the people that you’re affecting the constituents within your program, they can tell you what your brand is and the people that volunteer with your organization, they should be telling you what your brand is and your donors should be telling what your brand is. And then you’re looking for patterns and alignment and you’re trying to see if I imagine a word cloud, that sort of is the totality of what people are telling you their impressions and feelings about your organization. It could be everything from responsive to, in our case, baseball equipment to whatever. And then you start really feeling like you understand what your brand is or if there’s this huge diffusion of how people think about your, your, your organization and you realize we don’t really have a very well defined brand and that’s not really a great problem. That’s not a great, um I mean, getting the information is really helpful. It may not be the answer you were looking for. But so brand is really this totality of everything. It’s, it’s, you know, how, how you communicate the tone of the organization, the way you share the impact so that people understand what your organization is all about the, the consistency and quality of their communications, you know, branding is really the long game branding is about how do I want people to think about my organization? Five or 10 years from now. It’s not a campaign that we run on giving Tuesday, that’s not your brand, that’s a communication strategy, that’s tactical. The brand is really sort of more amorphous a little bit elevated. Maybe how you approach your Tuesday and you have more fun with it, maybe you’re more formal, all of those things should be consistent with who you are. You know, brands have personality, brands have personalities. So, you know, if you take a nonprofit organization, I don’t want to do this in the wrong way. But there are certain organizations which are maybe a little bit more abrasive and there’s other organizations that you said are more formal and then there’s other organizations that are more inclusive and welcoming and there’s organizations which are youthful and there’s organizations which deal with older populations. So all of those entities have to really think about how they communicate where they communicate all of those things so that the people that are the consumers of their organization experience, the organization in way that’s sort of right and appropriate for them. And then you could build and shape the perception of your organization into a brand over time, right? And appropriate and, and consistent, consistent, you know, what you expect is go to an event with you, they have a meeting with you, they uh I don’t know, they engage with you even, you know, just commenting on, on social posts or something. They, they know they know what the vibe is, they know what to expect if you’re lighthearted, you know, they, they, they know they can make a, you know, maybe make a uh ha have some fun in a social comment or something. That’s right. It’s a, it’s a consistency, right? So branding is one of those things and, and, and one of the references in the book is to uh Jim Collins and his book Good To Great. And he talks about branding is, is sort of like turning the fly wheel. So if you’ve ever been to a spin class or something like that, and you get on the bike for the first time and the resistance is kind of hard. You put a lot of effort in and, and the wheel hardly moves at all. And then, but if you keep applying the same effort and you keep communicating consistently, then the wheel turns a little bit more easily and the wheel turns a little bit more easily. And brand building is, is a little bit like that. The amount of effort it takes to establish your brand up front is enormous and you’re not going to see very much progress in the early months and even maybe years. But then there’s going to be a moment when the wheel is going to turn a lot more easily. And that’s because you’ve been applying this consistent pressure, this consistent messaging this consistent theme over time. So now finally, people are registering that messaging that you have been saying all along, but it just took a little while for it to sink in. And, and I think that that that sort of picture is really helpful for people to understand. It’s not a quick fix. Branding is not A B I go over the sports again. I I I’m, I’m outside me. Maybe I had a long term when you, when you mentioned, when you mentioned sports thing, you might have to take the, it’ll get, it’ll get much worse. Uh It’s a long term. That’s correct. Ok. Ok. Uh You, you sort of, you’ve alluded to this a little bit, but you, you make the distinction in the book about marketing versus branding. You wanna flush that out a bit. Yeah. And it’s, and sometimes it’s easy and I, I’ll find myself. I mean, I teach nonprofit branding at the University of Pennsylvania. I started my career, Proctor and Gamble. I’m a branding person. Um But the way you work with brands that we would know, I work with the Tide brand. I work with the Dawn brand. I use the Tide Free and clear. There you go. You were you there when in the free and clear days or I may have been there a little bit before lemon scent. I used to be in lemon scent, but now I’m purely uh free and clear for years, I’ve been, I’ve been committed to free and clear. I’m not gonna tell you when I was there, but it was before that. But anyway, that’s, that’s big business. So the, the thing about marketing is marketing is sort of how you carry your branding messages forward. So, um marketing is sort of the how and the what and, and so that, that’s decisions about, you know, which, which platforms you’re gonna be on, which communication channels, the types of messages when you do things, things of that nature. So marketing is much more tactical. Um It’s you really think marketing about who your target audiences are and how you’re going to reach them with specific messages, but all of them should tie back to this bigger notion of who you are as a brand and, and everything should still fall under that umbrella. If, if you got some marketing ideas that are really inconsistent with this big idea of what you think is your brand, then there are the wrong marketing ideas, you know, you got to rethink them, they should, there should be an alignment there that should make sense. Um So the marketing is really the tactics that of how you carry your brand and your planning forward. It’s time for Tony’s take two. Thank you, Kate, talking about talking to roommates. Uh I’ve been in a center seat for a past couple of flights. Now this is a touchy one. it’s a little dodgy. Uh, you know, everybody’s, uh, everybody comes in, they sit down and of course they’re, uh, glued to their phone. So now I’m not saying you have to talk to you or, or even try, but if you want to, if you wanna be a friendly outgoing person and maybe have a conversation, uh, first of all, you’d have to be off your phone. Yeah. And this is as the person enters the row, uh, and I’m envisioning you being the first person in your row we take on if, if you’re joining a row and everybody is already on their phones already. You know, this, this might work but not as well. So I’m thinking, um, you’re the first one in it doesn’t matter a row of two or three, doesn’t matter where you’re seated. Somebody comes in, you, you open the conversation. So what I’m suggesting is start with, hey, how are you or? Hello? You know, how are you a little more, something more than just, hi. Hello? Ask a question and see what you get back if you get back. Hi. You know. Ok. That’s that person. Probably not interested in talking. I wouldn’t push it any further, wouldn’t pursue it. But if you get back, uh, hello. Uh, I’m good. Ok, that’s, that’s pretty good or I’m good. I’m doing well. How are you? Oh, now, now they’ve asked you a question. So that’s my, and then you can go from there, you know, and then into are you, are you going home or you know, traveling, what, what’s, what’s at the destination, you know, wherever you all are headed, is that where you live, et cetera? So that, that’s the easy part going from there. The the more challenging part is opening the conversation and doing the uh call it, doing the assessment work. What kind of person are you dealing with? Or are they just, you know, it’s no comment on them as a person. Just they may not feel like talking, right? So by no means saying, am I saying, you know, push it or something? But it can be fun. Me, I’ve met folks, I’ve exchanged business cards, people. 62 years old sometimes. II I still carry business cards and other people do too sometimes. So it can be fun and you can learn about the city you’re going to, if you haven’t been there before, you can tell them about the city if you’ve been there and they haven’t. So, you know, it can be fun but you just gotta do your assessment work at the uh, at the outset. All right, good luck. Let me know, let me know how it goes out there talking to your roommates on the plane. And that is Tony take two Kate. So Tony, I think you can do that with just about anyone anywhere. Like even when you’re in like the supermarket and I love to do it when I’m getting my Dunkan order and I see, you know, the driver worker and maybe she has a new set of nails or her makeup looks great today. Compliments go a long way and just checking in on people. I think you can do that anywhere. Not even just on the plane. That’s excellent. I’m glad to hear you say that Kate. Really? Um uh I mean, I, I’m like, genuinely impressed that you would, that you’re doing that already for workers, you know, workers that just, people just don’t pay a lot of attention to, like, the drive through line at Duncan. Absolutely. Like, give me my order. Here’s the money I’m going. Oh, don’t you hate that? That’s so like you’re not connecting with the person and you can connect fast. I mean, on a plane you could have an hour, you could have a plane, you could have four or five hours together, you know. So all the more reason to try to strike up a conversation. But, yeah, but, but absolutely no, I’m, I’m glad to hear you say that because there are so many workers, service workers who are just really ignored. People just want their service and they don’t need, they don’t feel the need to be civil or polite even sometimes. Yeah, that, um, that gets me and then, you know, like if I’m behind the person who’s the uncivil one, you know, I’ll give an eye roll or if the uncivil person has left the area. I’ll say, you know, sorry you had to, sorry, you had to go through that. But yes, civility, humanity, politeness, sincerity. I mean, these go a long way, a long, long way. So I admire you doing it at the Duncan line and you’re right. There’s lots of places it could be done. Absolutely. Well, we’ve got f but loads more time. Here’s the rest of passion isn’t enough with David Rode. Can you talk about, uh the seven PS in your, in, in the building? The brand chapter? Now, we’re not gonna go through all seven. There are traditional ones. I don’t want to put you on the spot again. Maybe you can name the seven. Would you have been able to name the 16 chapters? No, probably not. Not in order. Well, not, certainly not. In order you think you could have gotten them all? I could have gotten them all. You could. All right, I’m not gonna hold you through. All right. Well, these are seven P. So we, we’re gonna take a little shortcut with that. So you, you distinguish between uh, the traditional 44 PS and then some additional add ons for, for nonprofit. So the traditional are the, are your price, product, place and promotion. But then the nonprofit add ons, that’s where I want to focus on the people proof and the process, right? So when we look at the nonprofit world, what are the tools that we have in our toolbox that can help us build our brand and carry out our marketing efforts. Um And the ones that I found to be the most important and relevant and really what separates the for profit and the non profit sector are people proof and process. So why do we talk about people, people in a nonprofit organization? You know, we don’t talk about who’s on the board of directors at, at, at mcdonald’s or who’s on the sales force or who’s doing this or who’s doing that. These people are totally unknown to it, unless, unless they do something outrageous to make a headline, then you’ll know them for the wrong reason. But in a nonprofit organization, the people are, are very important to carrying out our message. You know, it’s marketing, um, is very decentralized in the nonprofit sector. If you are a fan of my organization, you might talk about the work we do. So the challenge is as a person, whether you’re a volunteer or a board member or donor or whatever, my job is somebody that’s a senior staff member is to kind of make sure that I give you the right talking points. If you were going to explain my organization, you probably would not have had me on the baseball and softball board. That, that would have been, I would have had a tough time getting you through the nominating committee. But, but I mean, you’re a heck of a guy. What is baseball? But, but let’s start with a common understanding of what is baseball people as an example are important to people. It’s a remote hypothetical people help us fundraise people carry our message forward. People know other people. So we’re not buying, we’re not buying paid media. All of most of our communication is word of mouth. So it’s the people play a huge role in the nonprofit sector in terms of how we build our brand. And then we talk about proof. So proof goes back to this notion of measurement and evaluation. And so it’s really, it doesn’t have to be 53 different statistics about how your organization is making a difference. It could be one or two key numbers. Um It could be really even the proof could even be in stories, it could be storytelling, it could be a story about a family or a child or whatever that was positively impacted by the work that you’re doing. So that proof element is really necessary because you’re trying to say, we know that we’re having the impact that we’ve hoped. And I can tell you about this individual case or I can tell you about this data set and I can, I can demonstrate that our organization is making, it’s, it’s its impact in the way that we hope not every organization can do that uh equally. So the ones that are more successful about demonstrating proof are the ones that are maybe going to get a greater share of funding dollars and attract other resources. So proof is really important and then process might be not on the same level as, as people improve. But process is the way you go about doing the things that you do. You might have um special type of way that you do programming, whether it’s coming into the community in a certain way or the way that you serve meals or how your, how your shelter is organized or how your volunteers go into the home of people that are seniors and help them use technology or help them feel a reduced sense of isolation. So the process of how you go about your work sometimes is very interesting. I cite an example in the book of an organization that I um I know a little about here called Bloom Again, Brooklyn and, and, and, you know, they are taking upcycled flowers and then they’re using those to help reduce social isolation. So if you can imagine, you can’t imagine a more perishable item in some ways than flowers. So they’ve been used at a we or a party and then they get donated to Bloom again, Brooklyn. And then they, with their volunteers have to very quickly turn these back around and use them in a way that can be gifted and shared with people that are maybe not feeling a sense of connection in their communities for whatever reason. Um, but that process that they go through once you kind of see the care they put into that you’re like, huh, these guys really have their act together. So, you know, it’s the process can also be a way that we build our brand in the nonprofit sector, how you make laundry detergent or how you do this, that and the other thing in the for profit sector, the process isn’t really all that important. You know, we, we think in a different level in the nonprofit world, people proof and process can help define who we are and help us build our brands. I’ve had a little word about uh potentially rebranding. If we’re, why, why might we, why might we uh engage in a rebranding exercise? Well, rebranding is common. Um It’s common sometimes for the right reasons and it’s common sometimes for not as many right reasons. So a lot of times you’ll see a change of leadership in an organization, maybe a new executive director comes into the seat and they wanna, they wanna prove to the, to the community that they’re having a big impact on the organization right away. The first thing they’re gonna do is they’re going to rebrand the organization and that’s a very common dynamic. Um And rebranding can, I mean, rebranding can mean a lot of things in the best case scenario, what rebranding does is it maybe better aligns with the current version of your organization is with the current work that you’re doing, an organization could have been started 1020 3070 years ago, called itself a certain thing and, and, and was, was understood in a certain way, but then maybe it evolved over time and now it, it’s sort of a disconnect between the work they’re doing and, and how the organization may be understood by people. So in those situations, a rebrand is completely appropriate or you decide to be the upper West side something, something. And then you realize you’re going to expand your work to other boroughs in Manhattan. So you can no longer be the upper West side something or other. You have to be the New York something or other to make it more, make more sense in those situations. Rebranding is, is, is logical and necessary. Rebranding is not easy, it takes time, it takes money, it takes more time and more money than people think. And as we mentioned earlier, this is not a quick fix just because you changed the name of the organization and maybe tweak your programming. It doesn’t mean that people that have been living out in the real world or have the donors or supporters of the organization are gonna understand that and digest that right away, it might take a few years before the full effect of a rebrand really takes place. So I, I just, I want, I would want to encourage people to understand that while branding is the long game rebranding is also part of the long game. If it’s the right thing to do, that’s fine. But don’t expect it to somehow be some kind of a magic wand for your organization, your branding chapters where you, uh, on, um, Sarah Trump Peter from, uh Big Duck. She and Sarah have both been guests through the years. Uh, smart, smart folks, good smart agency. Uh, I think they’re in Brooklyn. Are they in Brooklyn, New York? They’re here in New York. And you know, Farrow is one of 22 subject matter experts that I interviewed in the creation of the book. And so while you get a lot of David Rode in the book, you also hear from some folks that have been in this sector for quite some time. I think that, that I, I did some back of the envelope math. It was like 450 years of experience or more in the group of people that I that I spoke with. So, you know, you, you not only get my insights that somebody’s been a practitioner and a founder and a consultant and an educator, but you get this compilation of all of their collective wisdom and knowledge baked into the book as well. So I was really delighted to speak with far and so many of the other folks that contributed meaningfully to the book. Next on one I I’d like to talk about is uh building your team and you break this into hiring on boarding, performance management and retention, uh hiring, you say, uh higher, slow fire, fast. Well, I mean, sometimes these are, there’s cliches and sometimes they’re cliches that you’re backing away from your own book. No, I’m just saying these, these, these expressions come about for a reason. Um I think we sometimes we can spot a problem, somebody that’s not working out, but we, we form a personal connection to them or we, we, we, we try to rationalize the ways that they could be helpful or might be helpful or have been helpful in the past. So we keep them around. We keep them around for 369, 1224 36 months longer than we should. So sometimes when you spot a problem, I’m not talking about being, you know, a maniac about this, but, you know, making the decision to get rid of somebody, there are a lot of talented people out there and if somebody is not the right fit for what reasons move on and you have to be willing to have made the mistake, whether you or somebody else made the mistake. It’s, it’s, it’s better to everybody else on your staff already knows that they’re not the right person. This is not gonna surprise anyone. So if you keep them around, you’re some in some way sending the wrong message. Now, how quickly you bring in that right person? You know, I, I just say you know, people are so um important getting the right people are so important that this is the higher, the higher part time. It’s, it’s so much better to have taken, taken a little extra time or significant time to get the right person because we all know how much effort it takes to on board train, you know, in, in incorporate somebody into our culture. Um And then if you get the wrong person, you just have to start all over and redo that again. Um And so I, I just think it’s really, you know, being thoughtful about this, uh trying to, trying to um take advantage of references, take advantage, use a hiring r do whatever you need to do. There’s a birthday and there’s a birthday the next day, there’s a birthday the next day, which is, that’s OK. This is, this is live podcasting. This is, this is, this is the beauty of the thing. Any smo can have a podcast without a, without a happy birthday message, but without a happy birthday singer, a full experience. Any J, is that what you said? J AJ? It could be a smoke or a jam. Sure could, could have a podcast episode without a happy birthday singing. So, but this is the next level. This is next level. So I, I think it’s important to really think about that. And one of the things I emphasize in the hiring chapter is to not just look at what somebody is like as a candidate on paper is really think about your culture, the kind of people that have been successful in your organization in the past and see what characteristics they are. You can train somebody how to do some specific tasks. It’s not that critical that they come in with skills ABC and D, but what kind of person are they are? How do they solve problems? Where, where are they in terms of their resilience and how empathetic are they? How, how good are they going to be as a teammate to work with others, et cetera. You want to begin to try to measure those things as best, you can assess those things so that you can, you can, you can direct somebody as to the specifics of your program once you have the right person. But if you have the wrong person just because they’re good at Excel or they’re good at working your, your database, they’re good on some specific element of social media. If they’re no fun to work with and, and they’re, and they’re not really, you know, committed to the, the core passionate mission of the organization, then, you know, maybe it’s just a job to them. And at the end of the day, you people need to believe in the work you’re doing in order for them to stay around because they’re not gonna get rich mostly in the nonprofit sector. And that’s, that’s a bit of a reality when I see, you know, skilled in razor’s edge or something, you know, you can send them to a course for that. Uh, that, that just because the last person was a whiz at razor’s edge doesn’t mean that the new person can’t learn it. There, there’s, I mean, there are all these other factors that you’re, that you, you just describe that are, that are so much more valuable than your, your querying, You’re querying acumen in razor’s edge, right? I mean, what is the, how is that person? What’s at that person’s core? What is somebody I’d like to have lunch with somebody? Exactly. Our donors, the board, they’re gonna be in front of your constituents, they’re gonna be in front of board members, they’re gonna be in front of donors. How comfortable would you feel? Yeah. And when they’re alone, you know, what, what’s their judgment you mentioned? How did they, how did they solve problems? Tell us about a few instances where you solved the problem uh overcame a, a, a AAA bad relationship. A relationship went sour. How did you overcome that? You know, these are the kinds of things that show reason and judgment and whether you can place. All right, let’s jump to uh retention, compensation, things like that. Right? Le let’s how do we, now we’ve, we’ve taken the time to hire the right people that are, that we do trust and they fit well in our culture. How do we treat them well. So that they’re less likely you can never prevent, of course, but less likely to leave, especially leave soon, like within two years. Well, I, I think it’s, I think many organizations have challenges. I was, I was speaking with an organization today where a lot of smaller leaner organizations, there’s not a lot of clear pathways for advancement. When I started my, you were talking about something about that I was making, I’m not really just today. And so, so Procter and gamble, you start at this level if you get promoted to this level and there’s 15 levels all the way to the top of the company. And you could, you could, you could imagine how your career will progress. But nonprofit organizations, there might be an executive director and then there might be director level people and then there might be people on the front lines with programs, et cetera. But there’s not all these levels that exist where you can become a VP or a senior VP and a this that and the other big nonprofits have that kind of structure because they’re just like any other major corporation. But, you know, I think the statistic was 92% of the nonprofit organizations have budgets of a million dollars or less. And if that’s the case, you’re talking about 456 employees or something of that nature. So it’s not this complex structure where they can really see how they’re going to advance. So I think one of the ways that you retain people is first and this sounds simplistic and I apologize. It’s, it’s a Friday afternoon. I’m gonna try to keep it simple for myself, but like, maybe you wanna ask them, what are they hoping to accomplish with their career? And just what are they looking to do is this, is this skill based? Is this something you know, how can you build a professional development plan with them? So they feel that they’re not only having an immediate impact on the work they’re doing for the organization now, but they’re helping themselves grow at the same time. So people, if people are growing and advancing and, and and becoming a better version of themselves professionally, then they might be more inclined to stay. They feel like the company is making an investment in me. I’m not just giving to them, they’re giving back to me and this is we’re in it together kind of a thing. So I think that the challenge that executive directors have is having line items in their budget for professional development so that when somebody needs to understand and learn more about certain things that you have the ability to send them to seminars, workshops, trainings, get them coaches, whatever is needed, so they can grow class and whatever that new technology is that comes out. So you really do need to ask them what success would look like for themselves where are they trying to be a year or two or three from now and see if you can chart a path together to get them from where they are now to where they want to be. And if you can do that successfully, then they’re going to think this person’s got my back. And even that you’re just taking the time, the fact that you’re there to ask and, and as well. Yeah, now you in the walking, you know, the talk part of part of that equation, then you have to do the thing. You can’t just say, oh, we really care about, you know, you have to, you have to come up with a plan you have or maybe you put it back on the person. Listen, I’m willing to send you to some of these seminars you’re describing, but I’m going to ask you to do the research on finding the ones that you would think would be the best fit for you. That’s OK. That’s a shared responsibility. But when they come back with the answer, you can’t say $400 or whatever that need. You gotta, you gotta be willing to or maybe give them a budget up front. Listen, this is what we have set aside. Can you, can you try to see if there’s something available that we, but, but have an open honest conversation with them and to find out what, what would be their career path, what would be, what do they want to accomplish in the, in the near and maybe if they know this much the long term of their career and see how you can play an active role in helping them get from where they are to where they want to be. And if you do that, I think you’re well on your way to people staying and having this listening culture I think is, is part of that. Uh Well, it helps people see a future too with the organization. That’s right that you’re, you’re, you’re, you’re working this plan that we’ve developed together and they see potential for themselves. Not that they’re in a dead end that they were hired as a development associate or AAA director and there’s nothing, there’s no, there’s no future for them beyond that. That’s right. They’re working in events to retire or die or move up. Sure. They’re working in events now, but they wanna, they wanna get into major gifts. They know that major gifts is the place to be or, or, or whatever as an example. So how can you transition them from where they are over time? They get more exposure to major gifts, maybe they’re not gonna become a major gifts officer or whatever. But like, hey, we’re gonna have you sit in with or we’re gonna have you learn how to do this and, and begin to kind of get them exposed. You have a small portfolio, we’ll start with a little portfolio of 15 or 20. And then you have more redundancy in the organization. Maybe your major gift person decides to walk out the door or they get hit by a bus or who knows what happens. Then you got somebody in your organization that could step in. So, but again, you’re not gonna know these things until you talk to folks and, and, and that’s the, that’s the end of the day. You’ve got to have quality time. You’ve got to have open dialogue. You can’t just tell them come to work and work hard. You got to figure out like, why are you coming to work? What are you hoping to accomplish? What do you want to learn? Where do you want to be? And I think if you can do that and then support people along the way, you’ll, you’ll, you’ll find your retention numbers moving in the right direction. The premise of the book is that it’s for new nonprofit leaders. And I think most of this that we’re talking about, if not, everything applies to uh uh applies to well, you know, well positioned long standing nonprofit CEO S as well. So I think some of this, you know, they, they may have heard it before, but it’s, it’s valuable to hear valuable advice, you know, uh repeated, you’re reminded of it. Um And sometimes, you know, I think your book transcends. Thank you. It’s, it’s purpose. Thank you. I appreciate that. I mean, II, I had a few people in mind when I wrote the book, some of the people that I’ve mentored along the way and it was sort of helpful for me to have a picture of them. When I was writing this book, this book is written in some ways as a conversation with them. But yes, I hope it applies more broadly. I hope it applies to board members. I think you’d be a much better board member having read this book knowing both the broader sense of how the nonprofit organizations function, but also having a better appreciation of what the executive director is going through so you can partner with them and support them. So there’s a lot of, there’s a lot of benefits to, to people that are other than just young nonprofit leaders reading the book. Let’s talk a little about building your volunteer community. Uh You make the point that volunteers, you know, the, the obvious advantage is they’re doing work, they’re not being paid for it and that can help you expand your, your capacity, uh maybe expand your programs if that’s appropriate based on what we, we talked about a few minutes ago. Um But also, you know, what, what do they get you? It’s a, it’s a value share. What’s their value proposition or what’s your, how do you say it? What’s your value proposition to your volunteers? That’s right. I think, I think you have to look at any relationship from both sides. And I think I try to, you know, provide that perspective in the partnership development chapter in this volunteer management chapter. You know, why are they coming to your organization and what do they hope to get out of it? Sometimes they are hoping to get out of it, special opportunities. You know, maybe they get to work with animals in a way that they could never work with animals otherwise. Or maybe they get to travel because you have a trip with your organization to some part of the world where they otherwise wouldn’t have exposure to that. So you have to understand and ask people, why do they, why do they decide to volunteer their time? And then, you know, think about how you can amplify their work. You know, whether it’s profiling your volunteers and some of your communications, whether it’s again, thinking about the volunteers sometimes are the best brand ambassadors. So make sure they understand what the organization really is. Maybe how they fit into their, how they fit into it. They might have come into the organization in one specific moment. Maybe it’s, you know, let’s, let’s say it’s um an organization working in food and security and they’re helping serve lunch one day that doesn’t give them a complete picture of what the organization is all about. So if you, if you can educate them on what the organization’s broader impact is, then they could tell story versus just, yeah, I made a sandwich for somebody and they, they didn’t go hungry on Friday. So, and I think volunteers have enormous potential. Volunteers can be converted into donors. Volunteers can be converted into board members. Volunteers can attract other people to your community. Um And, and so it’s important that we think about all the ways volunteers can be helpful, but it’s also important for us to understand all the myriad reasons that somebody might come to your organization and for you to, you know, be very intentional about creating uh opportunities for them to experience whatever they’re looking to experience. And so you’re, again, you’re only going to get that by, you know, it’s sort of like the managed by walking around thing, but going to your programs and interfacing with your volunteers talking to them. Why did you come today? Why did you choose? I love these? You know, you have some very basic questions to ask. What, what is it that you love about our work? Why did you come? Why do you spend your time here? People love to talk and, and so give them a couple of open end questions and, and learn to do something. I’m not particularly good at which is be quiet and listen. And um and then, but if you can do that, you’re gonna learn an incredible amount. And so give people the opportunity to talk, donors, volunteers, et cetera and they will tell you why your organization has meaning. And then you as the leader can figure out how to, how to bottle that up and, and use it to the best advantage of the organization so that you can grow the impact and help even more people. You wanna make sure also that you have the bandwidth, the capacity to uh train you train the volunteers, manage them appropriately. Um schedule follow up. You can’t just, you can’t just put out a call for volunteers without knowing that you can manage a volunteer. Ca That’s right. I mean, what is their experience going to be like when they show up? Are you organized or not? You know, did they get there and they spent an hour waiting around while somebody told them what to do or did you have a whole thought out approach for what was going to happen from the moment they got there because again, they’re forming an impression of your organization. The brand is being translated through that volunteer experience. And so you to engage volunteers takes a lot of work. By the way, in some situations, you can do the work more easily on your own because you know how to do it inside that you’ve been doing it for so long. But you realize if I had 20 people helping me, I could probably get more done. So how can I somehow systematize and train people effectively so they can come to my warehouse and you know, an organization like cradles to crayons, which provides, you know, clothing and necessary stuff for, for, for Children and young families, you know, they have volunteers that come and sort clothing by size and by gender and by this and by that, well, you’ve got to teach them your system in a short amount of time so that when they come to help do the work that you’re doing that they do it right. You don’t want to have to do their work nine times over. Otherwise it’s just rework and it’s not helpful. So what can you do? How much resources is it going to take from your organization? Do you need a full time staff person as a volunteer coordinator? Many organizations have that uh and sometimes it’s hard to justify that expense up front. But if you think about the, the impact that volunteers can have, again, this is very organization specific if volunteers are the right match for you. But in many organizations, that is the case that volunteers can be really helpful. The question is, can you make their experience positive for both the organization and for them, follow up with them appropriately, capture their information so that you can thank them so that you can communicate in the future when there’s another volunteer opportunity or, or what or when giving Tuesday comes up, you might want to ask your volunteers to help, support your work so that you can continue to grow and, and, and help even more folks. I like what I’m just gonna amplify something you mentioned. Um It struck me in the book that they, they’re your brand ambassadors from, from their first impression, the, the, their first half hour with you through multiple times that they come the way they’re treated, the way they’re followed up with. They, they can be very effective um evangelists and ambassadors for, for your work in the community. That’s right. And, and so that’s why you have to be very thoughtful about it. I’d like to move to um your, your final chapter is uh advice for new leaders, which as I said earlier, I think applies to all leaders. Um Share some of your own advice. Uh You know, I had some things I wanted to touch on but uh I’m feeling like less of a, a general manager now and more of a uh uh uh a more, more open approach. The general manager, that’s a sports thing. I was gonna have teams have managers, they do, the general manager usually decides, uh and, and figures out who’s gonna be on the team, they recruit the players to sign the contract and then who decides who’s gonna play full back or third day? Oh my God. Here you go. I mean, full back as a football person and third base as a baseball person. But yes, absolutely. So, advice for new leaders. What would you like to talk about? Well, it’s, you know, I, I asked the same question of all, each of the 22 folks that were uh subject matter experts were generous enough with their time to, to help me on this project. Um And so, while I talk to them about some very specific things in terms of their background, I asked them each this question about what advice would you give to somebody that’s either a new leader or new to an organization? Um And, and the most common answer was this notion of a listening tour, figuring out how to go around thoughtfully first to staff, to board, to donors, to partners and ask them some of these open ended questions. We just talked about, what does our organization do? Well, why are you, why do you support us in the way that you do? Do you think there’s anything that we could do better? Um, and really just get them talking and, and that’s how you can establish? First of all, that’s how you learn. Like, what’s the culture of the organization where, where the blind spots? What do you do? How are we perceived? How are you perceived? Maybe, maybe it’s inconsistent what we do, what we do hire, you’ve been hired somebody in the hiring committee, you were interviewed, you, you your way through that and now they gave you the job and now you’re like, well, now, why? And so the thing is you got to go find out what you just got yourself into because invariably you want have learned the true organization through that interview process unless you have been with the organization for 10 years and you just got promoted up from, you know, one level up to the executive director, let’s say you’re new um in that role or new to the organization. So these listening tours are fundamental um they’re vital and, and it enables you to learn about the organization and enables people to begin to develop a relationship with you to get a sense for who you are as a person. You’re coming to them without an agenda other than to learn and listen, you’re not telling them what your plan is. You may have a plan and they may even ask you what your plan is and you can tell them I have some of my own ideas and let me give you a couple of things, I’m thinking about them. But the reason I’m here today is to learn from you, you, you’ve been with the organization much longer than I have. So, you know, my thoughts might be preliminary. I’m here today to learn more about what you think. So turn it right back around as quickly as you can, right? Because you are here to listen. That’s right. All right. Um Self care CEO it’s lonely, it’s lonely at the top. It is. I mean, I’ve heard this theme over and over again that being a leader of a nonprofit organization could be a lonely job and there’s a couple of things that were suggestions that I think make a lot of sense, which is finding the cohort of other nonprofit leaders. Maybe it’s somebody that’s in your same community. Um Maybe it’s somebody need at a conference or something else. People that you can talk to about, maybe the struggles you’re having it. It’s a little bit of a therapy session. Sure. You do it over a glass of sauvignon blanc or you do it over coffee or you do it virtually doesn’t matter, but build time into your schedule to talk to other people that are kind of in the same role that you’re in. And what you might find is that some of the problems that you’re experiencing are also problems that they’re experiencing. And then you don’t feel like that somehow you’ve created this disaster and you’re the only one that’s been in it. I know it’s common and that gives you a sense of community and, and, and feeling a little bit better maybe. And then you’re also going to get potentially some really practical suggestions for how to move through that challenge. So that’s one particular suggestion, patience, patience for leaders. Well, and maybe this ties back in a little bit to, you know, this listening tour and being will may be willing to take a step back and learn before you might come up with an agenda and preset ideas of how you’re gonna put your plans in place and, and make the organization turn in one direction or another from the minute you hit the ground. But I think you need a certain level of patience to build relationships. You need a certain level of relationships to understand what the organization is good at and not good at. And then you need a willingness to understand that when you put changes in place that you may not see the immediate effects. But if they’re the right decisions for the long term, then you need to be willing to just let it take its natural force, setting up your successors, you’re setting up the organization and your successors and everyone for success and, and trying to get the fundamentally the right pieces in place. So where would you like to leave it? David? Uh spent a good amount of time. You uh I, I’m feeling egalitarian again. What would you like to leave us with? I, I’m just, I’m just delighted by the fact that, you know, people have responded well, that have read advanced copies of the book and I’m hopeful that I’m, I’m really excited to hear from people that read the book. I, I’m really hoping that this book has the effect that I’m intending. Um You know, this has been a really writing, a book is kind of a very vulnerable. Um There’s, there’s some big time impostor syndrome moments that come into play when you’re writing a book. Like, why am I, why am I writing this book. But as people have read the book and, and given me really good feedback, like, no, you were the exact right person to write this book, conversational, a bit of a sense of humor, a lot of experience, a lot of perspective. And so, um I, I don’t know, sometimes we have to get out of our comfort zone personally and professionally in order to grow. And I think writing this book was um that and um but I’m delighted that it’s, you know, the book is being released as we speak. And um I’m really excited to see what’s gonna happen because I don’t know, it’s a lot of unknowns, but I’m excited about the. Congratulations on the book. I, I appreciate that. And as far as I can tell, well, the book is excellent. Uh As far as I can tell, you’re, uh you know, a Stanley super series, uh celebrity star uh in all, whatever many sports that covers. Exactly Bravo and, and thank you. Thanks for taking time. My pleasure. The book is passion isn’t enough, a practical guide for nonprofit leaders. David’s company is dot dot org, which you’ll find at dot dot org.com and you’ll find David on linkedin David. I thank you very much again. Thanks for coming out to Serafina, sharing a glass of wine and uh your wisdom. It was a great pleasure. Thanks. Thank you. I’m glad next week, Stacy Palmer and Andrew Simon, the leaders of the chronicle of philanthropy. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you find it at Tony martignetti.com were sponsored by donor box. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor. Box.org. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martinetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation. Scotty be with us next week for nonprofit radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95% go out and be great.