Tag Archives: fundraising

Nonprofit Radio for February 17, 2025: The 4 Mindsets

Dan JohnsonThe 4 Mindsets

Over his years working with nonprofits, Dan Johnson has developed four mindsets, or principles, which he encourages leaders to embrace, and spread throughout their teams. He invites us to get comfortable with: The point is impact; the sustainable impact cycle; donors are partners, and, how volunteers get paid. He shares the touching story of his friend, Christina, who was murdered, doing the work she loved. Dan is chief consultant at Next Level Nonprofits.

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. If your host wasn’t so damn lackluster, he would have acknowledged Valentine’s Day last week. Just like last week, I had forgotten to acknowledge the 725th show the previous week. You would, you would think that this is, you might think these are planned, but they’re not. I, I just don’t, I don’t look ahead. So I hope you had a Valentine or more in your life last week and I will try to be more scrupulous about looking at the calendar for the coming week. But still, I’m glad you’re with us. Because I’d suffer the effects of African trippanosomiasis. If you bit me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, to introduce it. Hey Tony, I’m on it. The 4 mindsets. Over his years working with nonprofits, Dan Johnson has developed 4 mindsets or principles which he encourages leaders to embrace and spread throughout their teams. He invites us to get comfortable with the point is impact, the sustainable impact cycle. Donors are partners, and how volunteers get paid. He shares the touching story of his friend Christina, who was murdered, doing the work she loved. Dan is chief consultant at Next Level nonprofits. On Tony’s take 2. The kindness of a stranger. We’re sponsored by DonorBox, outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. Here is the 4 mindsets. It’s a pleasure to welcome Dan Johnson to nonprofit Radio. He is chief consultant at Next Level nonprofits. He’s a 4-time nonprofit founder, former impact evaluator, and nonprofit coach. He grew his first nonprofit to 10,000 volunteers nationwide in 3 years and has created federal and state policy changes on numerous issues. He’s on YouTube at Next Level nonprofits and his company is atexlevel nonprofits.us. Dan, welcome to nonprofit radio. Thank you so much for having me, Tony. It’s a genuine pleasure. Let’s jump in. these four mindsets you have. What’s the evolution of these mindsets, you know, give us sort of a high level overview before you start the, uh, the indoctrination and uh uh uh uh uh uh process of of changing our mindsets. It does, it probably does qualify for the dictionary definition of indoctrination. I’m I’m being fair then. Not an overstatement. Alright. So I think that to put it simply, uh, the wrong mindsets keep small nonprofits small. That in all of my time, both in nonprofits, you know, having some of the wrong mindsets myself and founding my own and struggling through that, um, and working with other nonprofit founders. Um, I have found that if we skip the mindset portion. And we just jump into the skills, and we teach new nonprofit leaders, you know, certain skill sets, you know, fundraising, marketing, whatever. Then it actually doesn’t have the transformative effect it needs to have on their organization. But if we start with mindset and we spend some time in how people should think about their own nonprofit, how people should think about donors, how people should think about volunteers, things change. And a good example of that is uh one of my first clients since I launched my firm, um, is Christa at Battle to be. Which is an organization that helps first responders and members of the military who are struggling with PTSD. And uh uh when we started working together, Krista had about a $50,000 revenue per year, so considered a small nonprofit, and she was fearful of talking to donors like, heck, I even stutter when I’m reaching out to people I’ve been doing this for a long time. Um, but, uh, we worked together probably for about a month and a half or so, and a lot of that was on mindset, on her nonprofit being worthwhile on how to think about donors. And uh we did a little bit of vision work too, and, and those two elements took her nonprofit to $200,000 in revenue the next year. That’s all we did. And uh I just think that any conversation around what it takes to take your small nonprofit and make it a bigger nonprofit or make it a legacy nonprofit or make it a high impact nonprofit has to start with mindset and that’s why I suggested that as a show. OK, all right. There are 4 mindsets. Uh, let’s, uh, I’ll just reveal them quickly and then of course, you know, we have plenty of time. The, the point is impact. The sustainable impact cycle. Donors are partners. And how volunteers get paid. So let’s begin with, uh, the point is impact. What’s, what’s your, what’s your message here? How do you wanna revise our thinking, uh, so we, we are, we are on beginning our journey to the, uh, cult of Johnson, uh, for mindsets. Uh, does that sound? It’s it’s a self-help book or it’s Kool-Aid at the end. Yeah, it’s a little ethereal, but we’re gonna break it down so people know that there is a genuine there is substance here. All right. The point is. Share your message Let’s start with a charity that pretty much everybody knows, the Salvation Army and the Red Bells, that represents how charity, Salvation Army probably represents the best of how charity uh has primarily worked up until the 2000s. When you have the red buckets, the red buckets and the bell ring the bells are typically brass, I believe, brass bells just like it takes brass balls to start and grow a sustainable and fruitful nonprofit. All right, so the brass bells and the and the red buckets, yes, we’re we’re all well acquainted. rass bells and brass balls. I like it so. Uh, let me ask you a question, Tony. I generally don’t like uh guest questions this early, but go ahead, anarchist. All right, most cult leaders are, you know, are not anarchists. Well, I guess they are. They just don’t, they don’t prefer anarchy within the membership. But yes, go ahead. You’re welcome to ask a question, of course, please, anarchist, go ahead. OK, so uh when you walk out of Walmart. And you give your change to the bell ringer. Let me ask you, let’s make it my Food Lion. I’m not. I’m not much of a Walmart shopper. Yeah, works for me. Food Lion down here. So you walk out of your local Food Lion and you see the Salvation Army bell ringer around Christmas time. And uh he asks you for your change and you give him that change. Do you primarily think about the impact that that’s going to make? Or do you just think, I really hope that does some good. Yeah, I’m, yeah, I’m not even sure I’m giving it either of those. I’m just, you know, I, I got a couple of singles, so I put them in the bucket. Uh, you know, I’m not thinking about the salva, you know, I just know overall they have a good reputation. You know, we see them every year. It’s purely for me, that’s, that’s purely a transactional charity. I see them in holiday time. That, that, that’s as deep as it goes. And that is how most nonprofits run their charity. Their donors give because they have extra money. Their people give them extra stuff that is garbage, that is leftover. I don’t have any use for this, so I’m going to give it to this nonprofit. Volunteers volunteer for the organization because uh they have extra time and they want to donate to somebody and that happens to be a nonprofit or they have a friend there that they like. For the vast majority of charities and absolutely the vast majority of small ones. They have a charity mindset. We are the source, we make uh gems out of everyone else’s garbage. That would be the way to put it. And uh this is how nonprofit leaders of new nonprofits usually think. They’re thinking primarily about how you hear them all the time in fundraising calls or in conversations, talk about how frugal they are, how little they spend, how, you know, much they push their team to do more than they possibly can do. You hear them talk about all of this stuff from what I would consider to be a charity mindset that the primary thing that they are out to do. Is make people feel good. And that is also the mindset that holds them back in pretty much every area of becoming a bigger nonprofit. Say a little more about that. They, they, they want to make people feel good. Expand on that. So for a lot of nonprofits, you know, I’ll use an example, um, a guy helped out uh in Texas, uh, he started a nonprofit to help homeless individuals, um, and the way he started it was, uh, him and his mom don’t like anything at Thanksgiving dinner. They’re just not a fan of the spread at Thanksgiving. So, they started taking when they would be invited to these dinners, they started taking the dinners to the local homeless encampment. And they felt really good about it. And so they did it again, and they felt really good about it, and they did it again. And this is how the majority of nonprofits start is I have some extra time or have some extra something um or I feel really good when I help this person or when I do something for this person and I want to do that more, and I want more people to get involved with me doing that. So it actually starts with the founder and how they, they looked at it. And everyone else around them is just used to nonprofits being like this. You volunteer for a nonprofit because it makes you feel good. You donate money to a nonprofit. What did the thing we always talk about with donors is uh uh you know, they, we want to reach their heart, want to make them feel good. All of this is about feel good, right? And there’s nothing wrong with that, right? There’s, there’s nothing that is bad about the the local bridge club and making people feel good and have community. There’s nothing bad about making donors, um, you know, feel like they’re, they’re making a difference and, you know, sharing stories and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with any of that. But the thing is, when we do things to feel good. We only put our extras there. And when we don’t have extras, we don’t use it to feel good. And that I think is really important for nonprofit leaders to understand. If you run an organization like many do, like a charity, that is primarily based on making people feel good, then you will accept impact that makes you feel good but isn’t actually helping the people you serve. You will accept donors who primarily want to give to your organization because of how it makes them feel. Your volunteers will choose to show up or not show up. Everybody talks about how flaky volunteers are. They’ll choose to show up or not show up because they do it because it makes them feel good. And that pins a nonprofit in a basically impossible to grow stage because you’re constantly relying on everybody’s feelings about the organization. Instead, what I encourage a nonprofit leader to do. I think about the difference. Why is it that people can should start a nonprofit. As opposed to a for-profit or go work for the government. And the reason is simple. The government is very, very good. At requiring people to do things. If there is a problem that needs to be solved by requiring someone to do something about it. The government is where you should go. The for-profit sector is very good at meeting the needs of people who can afford it. If you are serving people who can afford all of the food as a nonprofit, you might not be in the right area. You might start that as a for-profit. What nonprofits are uniquely good at. Is making an impact on the lives of people. Who requiring them to be better is not going to help. And having them pay for a service is something they cannot afford. That is the niche, if you will, that nonprofits do well. That is different and better than just making people feel good. Nonprofits change lives. They change lives, they change communities, they change cities where they can, and that is worth something. And this is not only valuable for uh startups or people launching nonprofits but also well established. You, you want people investing in your work because of the impact you create in the community, your state, your province, the nation. The environment, the globe, however you define your community, may be the oceans, or it may be your small town. Uh, so, yeah, I, I just, I don’t want folks to be astray that this is only for, uh, you know, launching. This is, this is, and this, so this kind of, you know, these, these mindsets, I think are just generally gonna have to come from. The top down, I mean we need our CEO to be speaking often about the impact that we make in the community, not that we just want people to, uh, feel good because we’re so we’re frugal, so that makes people feel good that. We, we save money instead of investing in the community, we’re saving expenses. So, so this is gonna trickle down from all these mindsets that you want to inculcate in us, uh, uh, or inculcate us to. No, inculcate in us, I think. Uh, you have to be from the CEO level down. Absolutely, they absolutely have to be from the top, because if the top is saying. That, uh, you know, it’s about no like and trust and it’s about uh saving money and you know, look at all the money that we, you know, spend on our program and we never spend anything on our staff and we never grow our organizations the organization is not worth growing. If that attitude comes from the top, everybody else will immediately buy into it because that’s the normal attitude of nonprofits. In fact, nonprofits are so used to. Operating on a lack mentality and who you are not that it’s literally in the name. Nonprofit. Yeah, yeah, yeah, so if I can. Let me give an actionable step for anyone listening to this as to what it takes. And then we’ll move to the to our mindset. But yeah, actionable steps are very, very welcome. I don’t mean to give short shrift at all. Yeah, good. So what does it take for you to realize the impact your organization is making and what that’s worth? Start implementing this mindset at your organization. I want you to sit down and determine the economic value of what you provide. Start there, right? Give you an example. Um, a lot of people who I work with, they are running like youth entrepreneurial organizations. Um, so they’re helping you understand how to be entrepreneurs and start their own businesses, including one recently in the, um, in the global South, actually lost a friend, uh, who was taken by the violence there who was doing this. In what country? In Honduras. But I work with a lot of uh organizations doing this. And uh you know, I asked him, OK, I want you, you’re you’re concerned about asking for money, you’re, you’re concerned about, you know, talking to donors about what you offer and a lot of that, it’s not all, but a lot of the fear of asking for money is just lack of confidence in your product. You’re talking to people about what you’re doing. I want you to think about the value of what you provide. Let’s say that you help 100 young people learn to be entrepreneurs, right? And let’s say that out of them, only 20 of those young people actually go out and start their own business, decent success rate for that kind of program. And out of those 20, only 6 create companies in the area that provide 10 or more jobs. Well, at a very minimum, a company that’s providing 10 or more jobs is probably bringing in a million a year. So your work with 100 kids is worth $6 million. Isn’t it worth asking for 1000? Isn’t it worth asking for 20,000? Isn’t it worth asking for 5000? Sit down with your team. And ask yourself, what is the economic impact of what we do and that’s just direct economic impact. That’s not talking about the values you teach them, the people, the employees, how they’re furthering their lives and their children’s lives, etc. and and the economic impact that they each have because they have a regular income. Yeah, order effects, but. Uh, I want to keep us moving because I don’t wanna, I don’t wanna end up giving our last mindset, you know, 30 seconds, short trips. I, I, I, I’m not being cruel. I, I want everybody to get the full value of all, all four of the, uh, All four pillars of the. The, the mindsets, the, I was gonna, I was gonna go back to the cult, the cult metaphor, but we’ll, we’ll pass on that this time. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s Donor Box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services, and resources that gives fundraisers just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs, helping you, help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now back to The 4 mindsets. Uh, your next one is the sustainable impact cycle. You make a difference between Uh, corporate, uh, commercial selling and nonprofit revenue generation. Go ahead. The quarter, quarter in the slot here. Go ahead. Yeah, absolutely. So this was a probably a little bit easier to, to wrap your mind around, but it’s something important, so. In my experience, and I don’t know how this relates in the data, um, I think I saw a statistic recently that 79% of nonprofit leadership reported being burnt out. Um, and, uh, it might be higher than that, particularly among small nonprofits, because what you guys are doing, this is your passion project, this is the impact, the legacy you want to leave on the world. There is no such thing as too much time spent on the legacy that you want to make on the world. The people you want to help, right? Um, but it is also the number one cause in my experience of nonprofit failure. Absolutely it is the founder, particularly in the 1st 3 years of the organization. The founder gets burnt out. They give their all, everything they’ve got, everybody loves it and then they realize it’s not sustainable and they keep it going until something breaks, their health, their relationship with their, you know, kids, their relationship with their partner, um, and then when that thing breaks, the nonprofit dies. And I, I’d always ask myself, why is this? Why, why do we keep running into this? And uh I’m the kind of person who always looks for the fundamentals and so I, I. Determined that I think the reason for this is. People who come into nonprofits typically only have experience in for-profits prior, whether as an employee or a business owner or whatever with an organization. And uh uh they know what works there. In fact, a lot of these are just, they have a for profit mindset and they don’t understand the nonprofit side. Um, And in for profits, you have a single phase revenue cycle. Sell transactional sales, that is your revenue cycle because every new sale you make means more money for your organization. In fact, most new clients that you serve mean more money for the company, which you can then invest in getting more clients. You have a one track revenue cycle that millions of books have been written on sales. And uh in nonprofits, you have a two phase revenue cycle. You not only have to make an impact because with the nonprofit, every new client you serve is actually less money for the organization than more. So, every single time you serve more people, you actually have to then go fundraise to raise that money in order to make that sustainable. And when someone doesn’t understand that when they, you know, how do, how do most new nonprofit leaders and maybe even existing nonprofit leaders select a project, they go, I see a need, you know, we need a food pantry in this area. There’s no food pantry in this area. I see a need, let’s figure out what it takes to put the food pantry together, let’s put the project plan together, let’s, you know, figure out how we’re going to do this. Let’s go implement the food pantry. But they didn’t ask the question. Is it sustainable? Will donors fund it? Because as a nonprofit, if you want to make the impact you have in your head as a nonprofit leader, you have to make it a sustainable impact. So every single so the the sustainable impact mindset is going from. I want to make this impact, so we’re going to figure out how to make this impact. 2, I want to make this impact. So we’re going to figure out how to make this impact and if it can be funded. And it sucks that you have to do both sometimes because there are some ideas you have that would be really helpful for people you serve and you can’t find the funding for it. But what that means is you will get 65% of the way into making the impact you want to make and then it will die. And if your organization is based on that, the organization will die. You have to figure out as a nonprofit founder, not just how to sell, how to make impact in nonprofits. You have to figure out how to get it funded and every single time you go to make an impact, you should be thinking impact funding impact funding. They are pairs, they work together. If you have too much impact and not enough funding, you will start losing your impact. If you have too much funding and not enough impact, you will start losing your funding. The sustainable impact cycle is 2 phases and everything you do as an organization leader, you need to think about both the impact it will make and how you’re going to fund it. In established nonprofits, that means uh new programs. What everything you just said would apply to a subset of your work rather than your, you know, your, your, your full mission. Exactly. All right. Uh, Yeah, you know, I see a lot of strategic planning. That is, is, is very widely often unfunded. So we have this 3 to 5 year plan. And the, the funding for it is like an afterthought. Well, we’ll, we’ll just have to ask the, well after the development often it’s the development person, not even the team, we’ll have to ask the development person to just, you know, she’ll have to take on a little more, she have to do more. Well, we need, we need more grant applications because we had to fund this. So rather than funding being an integral part of a strategic plan, so you know, I’m, I’m positing a, a more established nonprofit. Uh, but same, same principle. We have a, we have a plan. How are we going to fund the plan? The funding is, is an integral part of the plan, not an afterthought. Well, then we can take this a step deeper too. You need an organization to make impact. End of story. Well, that’s number one. The point is if you could do it by yourself. You would start your own podcast. You, you would just be doing it. You would just go out and do it. Exactly. And so this. Part of the sustainable impact cycle is understanding. That I have to have an organization to make this work, which means I need to be willing to spend money. I need to be willing to hire the right people. I need to be willing to spend on infrastructure. Your lack of technology at your organization is killing you in your ability to make an impact. Because you’re not investing in the organization along with investing in the impact. If you want to make social change, social change is hard. If it were easy, everybody would do it. I know because I was in politics for 10 years prior to uh with nonprofit work, but prior to working with community nonprofits, and everybody in politics thinks they can fix everything in 2 years and that’s why so many of the solutions suck. A social change is hard. When you are going and making your impact, build out your organization with it. Invest in that team, invest in your organization, find those donors, bring in that funding, because that’s what it’s going to take to change the lives of the homeless people that you’re serving of the children you’re serving of the women you’re serving. What ended up happening with the, uh, was it mother and son, the anti-turkey, anti cranberry sauce, anti-stuffing, was it a mother and son team? It was the anti-ryptophan or what uh, what happened with that mother son enterprise just briefly go, did it, did, did it expand or it just ended up delivering 6 meals each year? Yeah, it was a bit more than 6 meals each year, but they never really got Mindset one. That was one of the ones where we jumped to tactics, they never really understood Mindset one and so what happened was the founder got really successful in his business and decided to focus on that and the nonprofit died out, because again, there wasn’t that impact value, right? I assume his business was not turkey farming. It was not. Or cranberry bogs. He did not own a cranberry bog. Did not grow green beans. No, all right, potatoes for stuffing. No, not. All right. OK. Um, all right, so before, so we’re halfway through the, the, uh, indoctrination, uh, uh, the mindsets, um, let’s spend a couple of minutes, uh, can we honor your, your friend in Honduras? What, what happened there? What was that situation? Thank you. I appreciate that. Um, I could tell it was poignant for you or is still. Yeah, um, so her name was Christina Palmer. And uh she was a corporate executive at a fairly big um tech firm. Who decided to quit her job. And moved down to Honduras. Because her husband her um her husband is Honduran and as is her son. And she saw the plight of the kids there and she had this incredible idea. To create instead of all the other organizations there that were offering pieces and piecemeal, you know, we’ll teach you how to start your own tortilla business or whatever, because she worked at in big tech, she had access to all of these resources for high tech tools. And she was developing an innovation center in Honduras, where we bring all of this tech from the United States to Honduras, whether it was AI drones, windmill technology, and introduce these young people to this tech, so that they could learn it, they could, you know, get jobs elsewhere they could improve their economic situation, they could build a business in Honduras and help overcome that economic situation there. And um she. Uh She died doing what she loved. She lost her life from one of the same people that she was trying to help. Um, she was robbed and she was killed, uh, on the day. The day before Christmas Eve. Um, And It It brings home the. Importance Of what we do, um, I. She ignored mindset too. It’s all I can say. She ignored mindset too, and she kept digging herself into a desperate situation. And not being sustainable in what she did. And it put her in a position where that could happen. And what? And that’s that’s part of why some of this stuff is so important to me. this is real work. Like I don’t, I’m not involved in not, you know, I could go work for for-profits. I have a branding and marketing background. I could go work for a bunch of different for-profits, but I’m not doing that. Because this is real work. That we’re doing here. These are lives we’re transforming, we’re developing methods for solving some of the most challenging social problems in this country. I talk about we as the nonprofit sector, right? as nonprofit. This is why we do what we do. And this stuff matters. And uh Yeah, we’re I, I’m so glad you gave me the opportunity to bring her up because uh her her vision for. What young people could achieve that they couldn’t in in the global South, what young people could achieve that it wasn’t just, you know. They can have their own tortilla shop or or they can um. You know, create cute little Honduran art things, but that young people, no matter where they were in the world. Had the ability to be. Uh, incredible players in industry and in technology and uh you know. They had the ability to compete with young people from anywhere else. That was, that was her vision, that was her dream and. Um, Well, we, yeah. I’m sorry that happened to you, your friend, to you and and to your friend Christina, you know, it, it shows the desperation. Of the folks that she was helping, she whose lives she wanted to improve. It sounds like that person was just so desperate, um, but she was doing the right thing, just. I didn’t, I just didn’t quite manage her safety and I, I’m sorry, I, I, I think that if she were watching me right now, she would probably, you know, slap me a little bit and be like, get to the point. Um, and, uh, I think the point is. It’s OK to quit your nonprofit for a little while sometimes. The problems that we take on in this world as nonprofit leaders are really hard to solve, really hard. This is not easy work that we do. That’s why it’s worth so much. It’s not easy. The, the, everybody thinks you can solve homelessness in like two months and give them a shelter. The most effective program I know is in San Diego, California called Solutions for Change. They deal with family homelessness. It takes them 5 years. To get a family out of homelessness, like permanently. It’s hard work that we do. And I think the lesson that she would want me to pass on to you guys is It’s just OK to recognize you didn’t do it right the first time. It’s OK to go back, it’s OK to get a job. It’s OK to get paid. It’s OK to put yourself in a better position all the while researching, talking to the people that you’re, you’re looking to serve, figuring out how you do this again. It’s OK to stop. So that you can start again, so that you can be better, so that there’s so much more impact you can do. But if you’re driving yourself to the point of financial desperation, if you’re driving yourself to the point of not being able to do this work anymore, where you’re mentally not able to do this, where you’re burning yourself, if you’re doing that. It’s OK to just walk. And then come back when you’re better, when you’ve learned more, and the sector could use more of that. And there’s so many more people who will be helped because you took care of yourself. And then came back and pursued your dream with the new knowledge that you had. I think that would probably be the lesson that She’d want me to pass on. Very worthy, it is essential to take care of yourself before you can take care of others. And if that means stepping aside, Whether you’re CEO or or further down, you know, uh employee in, in nonprofits and you, you’re You know, you know, you’re not, you’re not feeling right. Right. Sustained. Healthy in, in, in practices uh or or just your own, your own being, um. It’s, it’s so much smarter to step aside. And maintain your passion and, and hopefully come back, or maybe not. But either way it’ll be it’ll be better for you and better for the people who that institution is, is serving. Um, it almost seems trite now, but I have to ask, uh, do you, it does seem trite. Uh, is there an action step for our sustainable impact cycle mindset before we move on? Identify how you are not currently sustainable. So you know what you need to do. So look at a couple key areas. That’s some deep introspection. Look at your volunteers. Do you have enough volunteers to do the work you’re doing? If not, stop growing. Stop. Go get volunteers to help you fill those roles. Do you have enough staff? Do you need more than volunteers in some of those roles? If, if you need more than volunteers, stop, go get them. Where are you at as far as revenue? Are you skimping and buying the freest software in existence and you know, everybody’s using OpenOffice on their Nokia, uh, and is that harming your ability to actually carry out your program? And in a lot of cases, it is, you know, talk to people how frustrated and how difficult that is. So many nonprofits I know are still using paper, not even using anything electronic. No millennials, that’s super weird to me. But uh regardless, evaluate your personnel, evaluate your funding, and evaluate your marketing. If you’re not doing anything as it relates to marketing and getting your word out there and you need new people. That’s part of being sustainable. People have to know you exist. To know you exist is know what you do. Sit down and think, what does it take to get us to be sustainable? And go focus on that before you grow again. So this is something that you can still be doing and be passionate about and be excited about and your family can be excited about in 5, in 10, in 20 years. It’s time for Tony’s Take two. Thank you, Kate. I have a story about the kindness of a stranger. This was uh just a month or so ago, I got back to my car in a hotel parking lot. And there was a note on the windshield, which I thought was a ticket at first, but I was like, it’s, it’s a hotel parking lot. I can’t, how can I get a ticket. Uh, so, um, take a look at the note and it says, I am very sorry, my eight year old son flew our car door open and dented your rear passenger door. And, and she left her name, her email and her phone number, and, you know, very sorry. And sure enough, you know, there was a, there was a dent. It was uh like 1 inch and a half or so, and the paint was, uh, was scraped off, but it’s something that I never would have noticed. It would have taken many, many months cause I don’t have passengers and I certainly don’t have passengers getting in the, the, the passenger side in the rear seat, right? Any passenger I might have, which is like, I don’t know, 3 a year or something, they sit up front with me. So I never, it would have been a long, long time. And I was just so grateful that she did the right thing when nobody was looking, you know, it was probably her and her eight year old son. So as a parent, she taught her son the right thing to do. And with no other adults around looking, she certainly could have got away with it. She could have just ignored it. But she didn’t. She offered to pay for all the repairs, which she did. I offered to thank her by reducing the cost of the repair for her, taking $200 off. And she said thank you, but no, she, she uh sell me the full amount of the repair. So, very thoughtful woman. Did the right thing when nobody else was looking, so I’m very grateful to her. And that is Tony’s take too. OK. Yeah, that’s really sweet, and that’s also like, you know, teaching. To take accountability. Teaching their son, yeah. There was, there was one just reminds me real quick. I. I’m a really bad driver and I I don’t feel very confident parking. I was pulling into my university parking lot next to someone. I went to go get out of my car and I didn’t realize how um. They were crooked in the spot. And over into my line, but I didn’t realize pulling in and so I dinged their door. I was like, oh my god, it’s a really nice car. So I got out. I went to my passenger side to go see if like I had like a napkin or something cause I had to go to class. And then as soon as I open up my passenger side door I’m on the other side, they pull out their spot and they zoom away and then so I never got to, you know, like I’m sorry, I didn’t know to do the right thing. You didn’t even see them. You didn’t see them get in their car. No, they were in the car and their windows were, they had one of those like tinted cars. It was a really nice car and there was or anything, but like I still felt bad for, you know, dinging them a little bit. But they sped off, so I’m guessing they heard that I hit them and they were just like, ah, then they drove away. Wow, well, you were gonna do the right thing. That’s the point. That’s the point you’re going to do the right thing, didn’t. We’ve got Boou but loads more time. Here’s the rest of the Four Mindsets with Dan Johnson. Mindset number 3, why don’t you uh introduce this one, please. I have two posters on my wall. One you can see in this video, I know it’s mostly audio, but when you can see over your right shoulder, it says charity. Charity is crossed out and charity. Charity is crossed out and is beneath it. Yes, all right, thank you. And I have another poster on the other side over there. That crosses out donor and replaces it with partner. Why? Because I need nonprofit leaders to understand. That uh because the point is impact. And because you need both money and impact to survive. You provide the impact and your donors provide the money. They’re partners in what you do. Everybody says, oh well, I don’t want to go sell to donors, so it’s easier to sell to somebody when you’re selling them something that they could use. And my response to that. Is uh you think the donors aren’t getting anything out of this? Really? You, you, you think you, if you truly think that donors to your organization aren’t getting anything out of it, shut down the organization because you’re a waste of funds and there are 1.7 million other nonprofits working on things that could be funded instead, and I’m dead serious about that. The reason that we I think that our organizations are not delivering to our donors as we have not sat in their shoes. Why do donors give? There was a, there’s one of my favorite books, the, um, it’s by William Sturdivant, and it is the Artful journey. And it goes through the process of developing a major donor, major gift donors written in the 90s. You sound a little unsure about the book and the title. Are you sure this is a book you’ve read? It is. It sounds a little unclear. OK, I was, I was unsure about the title. Yeah, I yeah, I was just a little fog, but this is a legitimate that you have. Yes, I believe you. So, uh, the artful journey, one of the things in it is he has a study where they asked donors, why do you give? Why do you support nonprofits? And unsurprisingly, if you’ve been in the nonprofit expert space for a while, the top answers were not the tax deduction and because I feel guilty. So, you know. But the top answer was not the team. It was not no like and trust. That is a bad model. The top answer was the vision. I give to the organization because of. What I believe they will achieve. See the donors who give you, particularly donors who give you any amount of money with a comma in it. They kind of wish they were in your shoes. What I mean by that is they kind of wish they were on the front lines, helping people that you help. They wish they were there and able to serve the people that you serve, but they can’t be. Hm, interesting. And uh and that’s why stories work so well, by the way, like, quick aside, that’s why stories in donor conversations work so well. You are telling them what it’s like to be there. Yeah, you’re, you’re drawing them into the work. Right? They they can almost envision themselves. Hm, yeah, exactly. So the way they can be there, quote unquote is with their money. That is what they can provide in this relationship. And what that means is uh. Nonprofits primarily treat their donors like ATMs. I go to you when I need money, and we all know you got to thank them and you got to reach back out to them and and whatever. But I want you to think of them instead. As partners, as people who are essential in helping you do this work. So the primary way they support you is their money, but they also have a lot of knowledge, and they also have a lot of connections, and they also might even want to volunteer sometimes to, you know, help out the organization. And don’t our partners offer all of those back to us besides their money. It’s also their influence and their networks. Uh, and their own values and yeah, so, uh, uh, a, a, a real partnership. Is, is more much deeper than just financial. Exactly. And that’s how I want organizations to start treating their donors. If you are linking up with a business partner, are you pitching them before you even know whether they would be a good partner for you? No. You’re having a conversation. Hey, what do you, what do you invest in? What’s your mission? What, what, what are you trying to do with your money? Why do you like my organization? Why do you want to talk to us? Why do you give us money? If you have partners after they give you a contribution or they contribute, do you like never talk to them for 36 months, a year, whatever, or are you consistently reaching out up what’s going on, giving them advice, you know, getting advice from them, uh, seeing if they have ideas. If you treat your donors like they fund our mission and that’s what we do, that’s what you’ll get, and then you won’t even get that. But if you treat your donors like partners, like people who wish they could be on the ground with you and want to do everything they can to help you make this work. Your donor retention rate will go through the roof. And you will spend a lot less time and money and effort, prospecting and trying to bring in new donors to fund what you’re doing. I spend a lot more time and effort just getting a whole lot more money from the people that you’re working with. We know that the donor attrition rate is very high. Over 75% of first year donors don’t come back to a second gift, and that, and it’s so much more costly to attract a new donor than it is to retain an existing one. It, it’s a it’s also more fun. It is, it is, absolutely. It’s not just sales all the time. It’s relationships and every relationship can’t be a personal one, but it can, it can feel, you know, if, if, if you’re embracing this mindset number 3 that your donors are your partners. It’s a, it’s a different way of looking at the relationship. It’s a different way of messaging to folks, you know, again, everybody can’t be someone that, that you have a handshake and a hug with and a lunch every month. That’s not sustainable, but it’s the way you think about folks. The way you bring them to you, the way you message to them will be very different if you’re thinking of them as, as the kind of partnership that that you’re proposing. Exactly. Is there an action step for donors or partners? Yes, there is. I want you to reform your, this, this should be fairly quick. Um, and I do have a uh tool to do this. It’s at the very bottom of my website at Next Level nonprofits.us. There is a link to the, I think it’s called the Donor Progress packet. Um, but if you click on that, it’ll take you to Google Drive and it actually has templates in it, but what I want you to do. I want you to uh implement. Um, a 4 star donor thank you system. This comes from Trevor Bragdon’s seven figure fundraising. See, I remember the name of that book. That was that that sounds much more credible than Sturdivant. So the 4 star thank you system is I just want you to think about. These donors are used to getting, especially your bigger ones, are used to getting really high tier customer service. Um, you know, they’re platinum at Delta, they are gold at Marriott, they are whatever. So what would it look like to give a donor top tier customer service when they give a donation to your organization? And there are at least 4 things to look at. One is a thank you call. Immediately as soon as possible. Another is a thank you letter. Another is a thank you text. And uh the final is the donor acknowledgement letter. You do at least those four things, at the very minimum for every donor who comes into your space. I love pick up the call, pick up the phone for effusive thanks. And I’m also a big proponent of handwritten notes. Absolutely. There’s there’s 2 of 24, yep. All right. So the resources, uh, is at the bottom of the page, bottom of the home at next nonprofits. Implementing something. Uh, high touch for your, your, your larger donors, your major, however you define major donors, some organizations, $150 may be a major gift. Others may be $10,000. That’s right. And actually, I, one correction, this is for all your donors, you implement this for every single donor because the mindset is donors are partners. The, the, um, Charity Water, which is a very famous uh nonprofit for those in the space. Um, they found that the vast majority of their kind of inner giving circle of their top donors started by giving them a $25 donation. Do not forget that your donors are your partners, treat them all to the extent you can like that, and you will see how they level up. Mindset number 4, we’re focused on our volunteers. So, so we’ve, we’ve just talked about how donors benefit, how our donor partners benefit. Now we’re looking at how our volunteers benefit and, and you frame it as Uh, how volunteers get paid. Understanding the volunteer paycheck. So please carry on. So uh. There are 3 kinds of organizations and how they treat their volunteers. Actually, there’s really only 2 major ones. We’ll talk about the 2 major ones. Top down and bottom up. And everybody thinks the latter one is better. So you have top down, top down is I tell you what to do, where to stand, how to do it, you know, when to do it, and you have to get approval from me in order to do that, right? Um, and that is how a lot of corporate America works. So that is the framework that a lot of us are used to using. And then you have another model, which is bottom up. And bottom up looks a little bit different. So instead of all the ideas and everything coming from the top. You have a lot of ideas and things coming from the bottom. But Bottom up always has a feature where the top has to approve it. So even if the bottom comes up with the idea, so you have your, uh, you know, line worker at the pantry, so I think we really need to have better boxes or whatever, that goes up to their volunteer chief who passes it to the department head, who eventually gets it approved by whoever needs to be at the top. Um, and both of them suffer from the same problem in managing volunteers, which is Volunteers look to you to be told what to do. And uh when you are a nonprofit leader, I’m willing to bet you don’t have a ton of extra time. Uh, there’s not exactly free spots in your calendar laying around for everything and everyone talks about volunteers like herding cats. If you adopt a top down or bottom up model. You are going to be herding cats. Because both of those are hierarchies. Where you called me an anarchist earlier, you might not realize how close to that I am. Both of those are hierarchies. Where volunteers are just kind of waiting on somebody else to tell them what to do. And as long as they’re doing that. You will struggle with volunteers. You will have to, they won’t show up, you have to call them to get to do the thing, to follow up all the time, yada yada, etc. That is the failure of providing volunteer ownership. I prefer a 3rd model. Uh, which was outlined, uh, in Working swarm wise by Rick Falkvier. Now Rick Falkvia is, if you’ve never heard of him, is the founder of the Swedish Pirate Party. Which became the largest third party in the world in 8 years. In fact, it was so large that they took a majority in Swedish parliament. And all of their positions were adopted by every major party in Europe. The he developed the concept of the swarm, which is we’re going to trust our volunteers to do what needs to be done. And then we’ll check on it. That is one of the 3 keys to the volunteer paycheck, and the one that nonprofits miss the most. So here’s your volunteer paycheck because I know we’re running out of time. Volunteers don’t get paid money. But they do get paid in 3 different ways. Purpose, ownership, and mastery. Volunteers get paid because they are contributing to what? the impact that you’re making. They see themselves being a part of that impact and they want to be part of something bigger. Volunteers get paid the second way and they are a part of that impact. Any person who tells you they don’t want the credit on your team doesn’t want to be seen getting the credit. They do actually want to know they individually are making a difference and that is why they must own the area that they operate in. And 3rd is mastery. Volunteers want to get better at a particular task. I’m volunteering for organization because I want to get better at web design, and I’m going to start by working with you. I’m volunteering your organization because I want to get better at X, I want to get better. If you are constantly delivering to your volunteers, purpose, ownership, and mastery, they will work for you like employees. And they will be thrilled about it. I had volunteers in my organization. Move states and moves scaled, but your first nonprofit 10,000 volunteers nationally in 3 years. Yes. Uh, I had my volunteers move states and move their entire family to a different state to be more effective at what we did. Wow, you had volunteers change residences, moves, moved to continue volunteering for you? Yes, your work, not the cult, not you, the cult leader. This is where I got everybody moved to Courd’Alene, Idaho. Uh no one fact, it was actually Idaho they moved to, but that’s hilarious. Coeur d’Alene has a rich history and uh and uh I think it’s white supremacy actually, but um it’s unfortunate. OK, yeah, uh. All right, so, all right, say a little more, you know, we can, we, we saw a few minutes. I, I don’t wanna, again, I don’t want to give a short trip to the volunteers, but you know, this purpose ownership man is like Palm POM like Palm I’m thinking of the palm that you’re the, uh, this is the pomegranate juice, uh, that’s a good analogy. OK, yeah, the POM, the company, the right, the pomegranate juice, uh, volunteer management strategy you have. All right, so say some more. Go ahead. So, uh, you had people move, you had people changing their homes to continue volunteering for the organization? Yes, go ahead, I interrupted you twice. No, it’s OK. It actually sometimes creates a bit of a burden to have people believe that much in the organization, but anyway. It’s a responsibility. It is, it is a responsibility, um, and it won’t always go your way. So the Volunteer paycheck. How you implement this with your volunteers. I, you know, first of all, you understand what of these are they most interested in when they come into your organization. Most volunteers want all three, but for every volunteer, not every paycheck is the same. Some people are more interested in getting better at a skill set than they are in, you know, owning that area or whatever. Some people are more interested in. Um, having being a part of your purpose, than they are in, you know, learning a skill set. So the first thing I want you to do. I, I want you to ask every single person who volunteers for your organization, why? They want to volunteer. That is not already a part of your process, implement that in your onboarding process now. Because you need to know if you just like employees aren’t gonna show back up at your company, if you’re not paying them, at least not usually. Volunteers aren’t gonna show back up. If you’re not paying them. So you need to know what’s your volunteer salary. And that question will help you understand what is that volunteer’s salary. Now you and your volunteer coordinator, whoever manages your volunteers, what they want from their volunteer work. Correct. What is their volunteer paycheck? So that’s number one. And number 2, I include all three in a volunteer onboarding. How do you do that? One Every single volunteer who comes on board, by the way, I always do a 20 to 45 minute onboarding with every new volunteer, always. Nonprofits bring on people too fast. They hire too quickly and they fire too slowly, put it that way and the wrong volunteer who doesn’t fit your culture can wreck it. They can drive 1020 volunteers away, right? So, number one. is we’re gonna talk about the organization’s vision. Ideally a transformational vision. We’re gonna talk about the organization’s vision, the impact we’re looking to make, and what our values are. Every volunteer gets that. Number 2 is, uh, I have a couple areas in mind that I want that I think you’d be good at as a volunteer, you know, whether they you indicated on the form, I’m interested in admin, I’m interested in helping out on the ground, I’m interested in whatever. I have a couple ideas in mind of where you can own in this organization. And uh are we still on because you froze on me. Oh, there we go. You’re just frozen like a statue. I’m captivated it’s. So anyway, it’s valuable. um, so I have a couple of areas in mind that I think that they might be interested in helping out with, let’s say, you know, website and you know, sending emails, they’re marketing persons website, sending emails and uh you know, designing our physical newsletter in graphic design. And I asked them, which of those would they be most interested in. Which a lot of people do. OK, fine. And then they they pick one that they they want to do. And then I do something different. I say uh awesome. So, uh, I’m gonna give you uh a task to do in that area. This is the thing we’re looking for. And um what I’d like from you is to carry that out, but also bring me a little bit of a plan of how you think this area could be better. In our organization because the way we work after you spent some time doing the work, yes, I’d like to meet with like I’d like to meet with you again in 6 or 8 weeks. Yeah, I usually let them pick because uh they have their own time still, right? So 2 weeks. OK, great, meet in 2 weeks. Um, and what I tell them is because we’re the kind of organization where, uh, we. Uh, won’t really tell you all that much what to do. Um, but we will hold you responsible for the outcome of your role, and we will provide support to you as much as we can. Instead of this being an organization that you contribute to, we are an organization that supports you in your volunteer work. And that will both tell you, are they a potential leader in any way, shape or form if they come back with that plan? And are they actually going to do anything at your organization if they come back with a task done. They don’t, it’s a filtering mechanism to filter out bad volunteers and it is a powerful mechanism for reframing the volunteer relationship. Where you own your area and you make decisions on your area and if I don’t like the decisions that you’re making and I think they’re bad for the organization, I will remove you rather than removing your decision ability because volunteers have to be able to own what they do or they will just be sitting ducks and wait for you to come tell them. And the last thing I asked them What would you like to get better at? Is there anything you want to learn while you’re here? Right, that mastery element. And, oh, you know, I’ve always wanted to learn grant writing. I don’t know why, but I’ve always wanted to learn grant writing. OK, cool. Um, and you know, somewhere down the line, we’re gonna have a grant writer come and speak to our volunteer team. And they’re going to learn about grant writing, and it’s gonna take me 30 minutes to set up and it’s going to make their day for 3 months. Whenever volunteers do not work, this is the mindset, volunteers do not work for your organization for free, period. They don’t work for your organization because they like you. They might do that for a little bit of time. They don’t work for your organization just because they feel good if they’re going to be committed. They work for your organization because they get a paycheck. You know what that paycheck is when you bring those volunteers on and you need to deliver on that paycheck. And then. You will stop having as many complaints of, oh, they didn’t show up. oh volunteers are unreliable, oh this, oh that, pay your volunteers with their paycheck and they will work for you like you pay them and that is really intensely valuable for organizations who can’t yet do that with the full staff. And the action step for identifying the paycheck, the purpose, ownership or or mastery is asking these questions in the onboarding process. That’s right. Hi, Dan, uh, this, it’s pretty, yeah, this is the first time someone thought I froze on them when I, when I hadn’t, uh, but no, you, I mean, you really captured me, uh, talking about the volunteer paycheck. Uh, we haven’t spent a lot of time. And, uh, we, we’ve had guests through the years to talk about volunteer management, but not so much the, you know, making sure they get out of it what they want and asking them what it is they, what it is they want. All right, that valuable. So that’s why I froze on you. Uh, I was just I was just listening patiently, that’s all. Um, it’s very good. It’s an interesting moment. All right, valuable, valuable shit, really. Um, why don’t you wrap it all up? I, I’ll give you, you know, take a moment, wrap it all up before, uh, the before mindsets. Well, first of all, uh thank you to everyone for listening to this. Um, it has been a long time since I have been on the podcast circuit. So Tony, you were one of my uh first uh usually, usually everything leads to nonprofit radio. We are the, we’re the pinnacle that everyone is working there the denouement is nonprofit radio. Since you’re an avid reader, you’re, well, you, you only you cited nonfiction books, but Uh, you, you, you understand what I’m talking about. So we’re just getting you started now. I’m, I’m a little disappointed at that. You might just cut it off. Now you’ve already, you’ve reached the pinnacle. You just didn’t know it. That’s fair. Maybe this is the last show. Maybe this should be for the next, yeah, until the next, you know, wait 18 months. Take a, take a step aside as we, as we suggested might be appropriate in, uh, mindset number one, it might be time for you to move aside and then bring yourself back, you know, starting again. All right. Well, at the very least, I have a habdominal. I now know what that means. Um, so, uh, but I want to thank everyone for, for listening to this, and if you do have feedback on the mindsets, because it’s my first podcast back after, after several years, it’s been like 2017, um, uh, then I would appreciate that. That would be awesome. Maybe you can send it to Tony and he can pass it on to me. That would be great. Um, I want to end with what I think would be most valuable for any organization that feels like they are not sustainable. So you do that assessment and you’re like, oh man, we don’t really have enough money, we’re pushing our people too hard. You know, we’re we’re just not in a place where. You know, your kind of test is, does this organization run normally or does it feel like you are burning the candle at both ends all the time to do this and to make it work and people aren’t listening to you and they’re not getting on board, whatever, right? That’s the first phase of nonprofit growth. If you’re struggling in that area. One of the things that we’ve developed over the past couple of years with our clients is the 5 steps, or the 5 levels of sustainability as a roadmap for how do you actually get a nonprofit? That has the money that has the, you know, everything you need to run one program and make an impact. How do you do that? Um, and we’ve broken down those five steps on my website, so I have a giveaway that is the sustainable nonprofit Roadmap on my Next Level nonprofits.us website. It’s the 5 steps that take you from where you are to being a sustainable organization. And uh uh if you put in the reference, nonprofit radio, I’ll know you came from here, and uh uh you can get, you can also get on my calendar in addition to just getting that roadmap, but I want to make sure you guys have that roadmap, so you’re not sitting there, you’re not wondering what does it take to make this nonprofit work, man? Why doesn’t it actually work? Why am I putting in all this effort and time and energy and it’s just, I feel like I’m burning a candle at both ends all the time. This is your roadmap to get out of that, so you can focus on making an impact instead of just making the nonprofit work. It’s on my website, Next Level nonprofits.us. Put a nonprofit radio in the reference. I know you came from here. If you do that, then I’ll also send you a link to my calendar. We can hop on and kind of diagnose where you’re at and see if I can give you some, some helpful tips to walk away with. Well, thank you for that generous offer for our listeners. Thank you. Thank you, Dan. Dan Johnson, uh, who now realizes that his, uh, podcast gusting is all gonna be downhill from here. It can only get worse Because you’re at the pinnacle. Uh, Chief consultant at Next Level nonprofits, again, Next Level nonprofits. and you will find him on YouTube also at Next Level nonprofits. Dan, thank you very much. Thank you for sharing and, and the story of Christina and, and your thinking on the, on the mindsets. Thanks so much for sharing all of this. Thank you for having me on, Tony. Next week, Jean and Amy return for a light chat about the devastations facing our nonprofit community. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by DonorBox. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guide, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for January 27, 2025: Storytelling

Sarah Wood: Storytelling

Sarah Wood reminds us of the value in telling good stories to your stakeholders. Also, how do you tell them? Where do you tell them? Which ones are worth telling? What’s ethical storytelling? And, what’s the right engagement or call to action? We pull some lessons from her children’s favorite stories, the “Narwhal and Jelly” series and “Dandelion Magic.” She graciously shares her own story of solo motherhood by choice. Sarah’s company is Sarah Wood Communication.

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

Welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the podfather of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d be thrown into dextrogastria if you upset my stomach with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, to tell us what’s going on this week. Hey, Tony, I’ll be happy to. Storytelling. Sarah Wood reminds us of the value in telling good stories to your stakeholders. Also, how do you tell them? Where do you tell them? Which ones are worth telling, and what’s the right engagement or call to action? We pull some lessons from her children’s favorite stories, the Narwhal and Jelly series and dandelion magic. She graciously shares her own story of solo motherhood by choice. Sarah’s company is Sarah Wood Communication. On Tony’s take 2. Thank the folks who nobody thanks. We’re sponsored by Donor Box. Outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, DonorBox.org. Here is storytelling. It’s a pleasure to welcome Sarah Wood. She is the founder and chief communication consultant at Sara Wood Communication LLC. A lifelong voracious reader, Sarah has been helping individuals and organizations identify and effectively share the stories of their good work for her entire professional career, and she still loves a good story. We’re gonna talk all about stories and storytelling. You’ll find Sarah on LinkedIn and her company is at Sarah with an H Wood communication. Dot com. Sara Woodcommunication.com. Sarah Wood, welcome to nonprofit Radio. Thank you for having me. I’m excited to be here today. Oh, I’m glad, pleasure. Storytelling. You’ve been doing this for a long time. Why, uh, why are, why are we still talking about storytelling? We’ve been talking about storytelling for years now. What, what brings this, what makes this so timely for us? Well, storytelling has become the the term, right, that we’re using now, uh, and people are very into, you know, they talk about storytelling, they talk about narrative, they talk about all that. In reality we’ve been doing this. The entire human existence, right? Uh, I mean, you can go back to caveman days, um, before we even had a written language. People were telling stories, sitting around the campfire, telling stories, uh, and that was how they were teaching people. It was how they were remembering things. It was how they were communicating with each other. Um, and so in some ways, nothing has changed, right? Uh, we still know that there’s a lot of research out there that shows that’s one of the best ways for humans to pass on information. It’s what we do with small children, right? We read to them, we tell them stories. If they’re getting ready to do something new, we talk about like, oh, here’s a children’s book for it, that’s gonna help them kind of like understand and process and go through it. And the same is true for adults, and we still love a story, even those of us who don’t get to read that often. I used to be a voracious reader. I still have that in my bio, but I’ve got two small kids and, you know, a business and everything else, and so I don’t read as much as I would like to anymore. You’re reading. I am. I’ve read so many of them. You’re a voracious reader of children’s stories. What age are your children? Um, they’re 2 and 6. Oh, the 22 year old, do you? I don’t have children. Do you read the 2 year olds or is that too early? You you when they’re like newborns. It’s a it’s a good thing I don’t grow up illiterate because I wouldn’t know I wouldn’t know. Hopefully somebody would have told me. Uh, OK, so you start at, uh, at birth or, you know, we’re hearing our whole lives, right? Whether they’re books, whether it’s radio, whether it’s television, whether it’s, you know, just some story that your parent made up to help you go to sleep at night, you know, we’re telling stories the entire time and we’re listening and we’re learning and that’s how. We learn about humans and we feel connected to each other. So we’ve been, we’ve been doing it the entire time, but there’s a rise of interest in it as far as nonprofits go recently. All right, but before we get to nonprofits, so give a shout out to your six year old’s favorite book. That’s a tough one. You know, he really likes the, um, trying to think of the name of it, Narwhal and Jelly series. It’s a kind of comic graphic novel type thing, and the main characters are a narwhal and a jellyfish. Um, and so there’s all these different titles in the series, and, and he really loves those. OK. So there are, so they may they may be sympathetic or maybe they’re in need of a title or. To, to, to broaden their own voracious reading children’s books. Yeah, and I mean the good thing, good thing they’re they’re kind of out of the, I want to read the exact same thing like over and over and over again. My 2 year old, you know, we’re definitely like, we can read the same book like 10 times in a row and she’s still fascinated. have a favorite? Uh, she likes it. It’s right here next to me. It’s called Dandelion Magic, and she likes it because it instructs you to like blow on the magic dandelion. So, you know, she gets to like, and, and blow, um, and make magic things happens. It’s an engaging. There’s some, there’s some engagement that we may talk about, uh, hopefully we’ll be talking about donor engagement with their stories. So she likes the act of blowing on blowing on the dandelion. Yes, she does, she does. She’s a big fan of that. All right, so we can pivot back to the less interesting but maybe more relevant nonprofit storytelling. All right. Well, some of the same things apply, right? You still want to make it interesting and ideally you’re making it interactive in some sort of way. Um, you know, a son and daughter, you know. Uh, what about feedback or or volunteer feedback or just whoever readers reader feedback on our stories? How do we get feedback? How do we know which is the favorite stories? Well, it depends on how you’re presenting the stories, what stats you have available, right? Different platforms are gonna have different ways for you to measure kind of what’s happening, who, who’s interacting with it and, and who’s not. Um, I mean, you also have kind of Behind the scenes ways of doing that, you know, you can kind of set up some separate URLs or landing pages, you know, so that you can kind of track specific interests of like, you know, who’s coming from this place and who’s coming from that place. Um, so it really kind of depends on what your setup is and kind of how you’re presenting your story. OK, if you’re, if you’re presenting it to a list and if you’re, I guess if your list is big enough, uh, you could test, you could test different stories, right? If you, if you have a large enough list to have a valid test or a simple AB test of different stories, OK. All right, I’m making you jump around, but, uh, I, I know, I wanted to launch off the uh the children’s children’s reading because that’s what you’re a voracious reader of children’s stories. So, yes. Well, and you know, I mean, some, some storytelling does happen in person, right? So if you’re at an in-person event, if you’re at an event for your donors or an event with uh potential donors, right, you can kind of catch up on all the cues, right, of are they interested or not, you know, you’ve got the nonverbals then. Um, but you know, it really depends on kind of how you’re presenting it. That’s, that’s a very interesting ones on that thread a little bit. The in storytelling, like having your cache of, uh, I don’t know, one program or, you know, whatever, you know, you’ve got some stories in mind that when people say, you know, oh I love your Uh, the hospice work you do really moves me, you know, then maybe you’ve got a hospice story or it’s the, uh, you know, it’s the fact that you’re a no-kill shelter. Oh, that really, now I’ve pivoted now. Now that’s not a human no-kill shelter. That’s an animal I’ve pivoted from human to human uh hospice, although you get a pet hospice too, but I wasn’t thinking of that. So we’re not talking about animal urine you’re a no kill shelter. I love that, you know, that aspect because you’re the only one in our state that’s a no-kill shelter or something like that, so. You know, so yeah, I mean I I never thought of in storytelling. Yeah, I always encourage anyone. I mean this is any organization doesn’t have to do with what industry you’re in, but you have to have your elevator speech down first, right? What is your organization? What’s the main thing that you do? Why should people care? You know, you need that kind of one minute spiel, right? Um, that you can give to anyone. And I always tell people, listen, don’t just get your executive director who’s able to do that. Every single. Employee in your organization should be able to give a one minute elevator speech about your organization, what it is, what it does, and why it’s important. Uh, if not, you’re just missing so many potential opportunities because think about how many more people every single staff person of yours interacts with on a daily basis than just, you know, your executive or your C-suite or or what have you. You know, you really wanna make sure that everyone’s on the same page. Um, so that’s one. But also, yes, absolutely, you should have like your back pocket full of like. Pack full stories. I mean, people want to do business with people. We know that there are companies, we know there’s organizations, but the more we can humanize and personalize those and we can put a face to what we’re doing and why it’s important, the more successful a nonprofit’s gonna be. I mean, it’s, it really lays the foundation for anything that you might want to ask those people later, right? Because if you just come up to someone and you say, hey, give me some money to do X, they’re gonna be like. Why? You know, like, what, what impact is this gonna have? Like, and people love other people, right? So, I mean, and it is not, even if your nonprofit doesn’t work with people, like you were just saying, like, the, the dogs, right? Or the no-kill shelter, you know, the dogs or the cats. We wanna like personalize and humanize the dogs and the cats, so that people feel close to them. They feel connected. The more connected someone feels, the more likely they are to. Invest in your organization and in your mission. Right. Now, how about uh disseminating these stories to, let’s say board members or volunteers it could be, could be non board member volunteers, you know, they’re, they’re great spokespeople because they, they devote time. They give several hours a week or whatever, you know, time, time is great value, especially now, time and attention. So. So volunteers could be great storytellers and as well as your board, but how would you, how do you pass these stories on to them? Like, so let’s take, um, let’s take the harder case first, like volunteers. So these folks are spending maybe 45, I don’t know, 10 hours a week or something. How would you arm them with stories about your work? I think volunteers are going to have their own stories, so it’s more about helping them share them in a way that is helpful to the organization they’re gonna share what their work is right, they’re gonna talk about their personal experiences, um, and, and their personal interactions or or and you know what they get out of it and what they feel like they’re doing. Um, so like I said, it’s more about helping them learn how to share that in a way that is effective, um, and that helps the organization overall. So how do you, how do you help them effectively? I think you have to arm them with the facts, right? You want them not just to have their personal experience, but to give them the the bigger picture, right? of how does their personal experience fit in with the bigger picture. I think if they have a particular thing that they want to talk about and they let you know that, I think that you can provide them with the background. Yeah, I mean, if you’re a big enough organization, you can even do media training for your volunteers, um. And you can pitch them as speakers as kind of ambassadors and out into the community, uh, that does take, you know, some, uh, staff effort on the, on, on the inside, but I think take advantage of the opportunities, you know, if you have a volunteer, particularly if you have a volunteer that is very well connected in the community, make sure that they have the information that you want them to have. And if they want to take that opportunity to kind of like practice what it is they want to say, give them that opportunity. OK. All right. And uh board members, that’s a little easier. I mean you could, you could write some story, you could write some anecdotes, you could share, have people come and tell their own personal story at board meetings, right? How important your work is not to the community, but to me, me, my family, my child, me personally, my spouse, whatever, right? And board members and the same thing with volunteers like that are already there if they’re already there. They’re already kind of committed, right? They already know about your organization. They are, they’ve already drank the Kool-Aid to, you know, throw an adage in there, um, you know, they’re, they’re already on board with what you’re doing. You don’t have to convince them. It’s not a hard sell, right? It’s just about showcasing the impact that you are having and nonprofits do so many good things and if they don’t talk about them. They’re just kind of lost, right? I mean you might impact a few people, a handful of people that directly know what happened, right? But if you can’t share those stories and amplify them and put them out into the world, you’re gonna hit a plateau for your organization where you’re not able to get the volunteers or to get the donations or to expand the programming or bring people in that that you could help, right? Because they don’t know about you, they don’t know about what’s happening so the more you can tell your stories, the more you can put it out into the. World, the better off your organization is gonna be because you’re gonna be able to have this foundation of support you’re gonna have this relationship with your audiences because you’ve been consistently telling them what you’re doing so that way when you ask them for money or you come out with big news, they’re already primed to listen to what you have to say because they’ve already decided, OK, this is a valid source and this is a source that is doing important things and so I’m gonna pay attention when they are saying something to me. Right, get good folks out. Um, let’s get folks out storytelling and finish, finish my thought. Um. Yeah, don’t overlook your ambassadors. Any, you know, anyone who is willing to be an ambassador for you and to talk you up, you know, give them the tools to do that. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money, but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location so you can grow your impact faster. That’s Donor Box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs, helping you help others. Visit donorbox.org to learn more. Now back to storytelling. How about engagement? We, we, we, we talked about uh your daughter’s engagement with the dandelion, dandelion story. She loves to blow on the little on the dandelion pages, I guess you can blow on the pages. Yes, OK. Like they can’t still be dandelion seeds. There’s nothing really blowing. It’s not a dandelion, it sounds like she’s so many times. I mean she does really blow and of course, you know, like you know it is not a slot like dandelions in the book. OK. What’s the name of the book. And magic magic, OK. So let’s let’s continue there. So what about engagement with your stories? Is there, is there a parallel for for nonprofits, folks engaging not so much, yeah, not so much the metrics, but the engagement. The old mode of communication was much more one way communication, right? It was kind of we say it. You hear it, and there wasn’t really an an ability to interact, certainly not in real time, right? I mean, you could conceivably like write a letter and mail it, you know, and, and all those kind of things. Um, but there wasn’t really the ability to interact in real time that we have now, right? And so now we have much more ability to get instant responses or instant reactions, and we can do, we can even do live things, right? Um, and we can get them like right away. Um, so I think. Things that your audience is interested in and that they want to interact with are very important because you don’t want it, you don’t want people to feel like they’re being lectured to, right? You want them to feel like part of the community, part of the conversation. And part of the way you do that is just having interest interesting content, right? But and humanizing it and personalizing it and all the other things that we’ve talked about, um, because that makes people feel more involved. But other ways you do it is, you know, you ask them questions, you give them ways to get involved. You don’t just kind of like put it there. And then drop off the face of the earth, like, um, what do they want to see? You know, what does this make them feel like? Are they going to take action? Here’s the actions we’d like you to take. Would you do any of these things? Like, I think all that kind of engagement is, is important, and It depends on where your audience is, how you’re going to interact with them the most, you know, maybe, maybe your main audience is on email, maybe it’s on social media, maybe it is these in-person events, maybe you do a lot of local in-person meet and greet type things. I mean, it, it really is gonna depend on. The organization and the specific people that they are trying to reach. Um, but yeah, you, I mean, you have to be engaging. I mean, I think we’ve, there are so many people trying to catch your attention. That you have to be engaging or. You’re you’re forgetful, right? I’m not forgetful, you’re forgotten, um. And it’s, it’s hard to catch people’s attention. I, you’re forgotten or you’re forgettable. Yes, yes. And you know, I feel like there was that old adage that You know, you have to hear things 3 times before you would take an action. And I was like, well, that’s very outdated, right? You have to hear things way more than 3 times now. I was on a webinar the other day and someone dropped it, it’s now 25 times. And I was like, well, they didn’t actually cite that. So I don’t know if that’s research based, but it kind of feels true, right? It feels like it, it passes the smell test, right? Because there is just so much information out there and we’re bombarded with it, like all the time. So it’s an and everyone can sell their story now, right? That’s the main thing that’s different about storytelling in the past versus storytelling today. The storytelling in the past was, you know, you kind of had a few people who were able to tell the stories and able to get that out and it was like your major national television networks, you know, your radio channels, that kind of thing, and now everybody has a platform, right? authors, journalists, yes, yes, there was kind of like gatekeepers, right? There were people you had to go through and now everybody can tell their story. It’s really been democratized, you know, we can all tell our story. It’s a what’s important now is being able to choose the stories and determine how to present them in the ways that best reach and resonate with your audience. And another thing that’s come to light is not a lot of, I won’t say just nonprofits, a lot of organizations in general. I feel like back in the 90s we’re doing this a lot and it was kind of the um poverty porn, um for lack of a better term, stories, right? Where you were putting these kind of sob stories of these people that were in this terrible situation and you know, the organization came in and they really like changed their lives, right? And, and up and did it. And, and that may very well have been true. um. But I think there’s more of a recognition today of the importance of telling stories ethically, right? And part of that ethical storytelling is really making sure that telling the story benefits everyone involved, you know, and that we’re not taking advantage of someone who we were able to help in order to kind of. You know, make ourselves look better or to to get more for that, right? We have to be very careful about how we tell these stories, particularly, you know, when people are involved, um, not exploiting a situation or, you know, a tragedy. Exactly and making them aware kind of of the the potential repercussions of sharing their story that maybe they haven’t thought through um because particularly, you know, you might have someone, you know, maybe they’re maybe they’re young and you know they haven’t necessarily thought through that they can tell the story and they can literally follow them their entire lives, right? Um, because of the internet, because of social media, because of the ability to like find information now in, in ways that were not present, you know, in past, in past areas. Um, so I think just making sure that you’re telling the story in a way that benefits everyone, and that might involve, you know, being anonymous, it might involve, you know, changing the way that you’re doing it. It certainly involves making sure that you have The appropriate releases, you know, to, to tell the story and making sure that you’re kind of educating people who may be, who are doing you a solid, right? We’re doing you a solid by sharing the story of how your organization impacted them, that, that they’re actually getting something out of it as well, and that they’re not gonna get negative repercussions from doing so. Let’s talk about what makes a good story, uh, a good ethical story, of course, and uh I wanna use the uh the Norwhal and jellyfish example. What, what do you think makes that a good story? For your, for your son, is that why is that you said it’s a, yeah, what is it what is it about the uh the Norfish that we can, we can extrapolate for good storytelling nonprofits? Well, one, it’s very visual, right? It, it is a graphic novels. I don’t even know. I don’t know if there’s a length to be called a graphic novel because they’re not super long, but I’m going to say they’re graphic novels. OK. Children’s graphic children’s novel. Right. And like most children’s books, right? Most children’s books are super visual. So I think, um, you know, you have to catch people’s attention, you know, and it’s not always visual, but you have to think about what is it that’s gonna catch and keep people’s attention. So that’s not only the story itself, right? So it’s the actual storyline and that being interesting and these particular books have a lot of comedy, right? They’re, they’re funny and they’re cute, um, and there’s a lot of puns. He’s very into word puns, um. So, you know, there’s the things that make the content itself engaging, so the words themselves are engaging. Also the visuals, right? It it’s very visually engaging, there’s lots of pictures for him to look at, um. In his case, there’s not a huge amount of words per page, that’s important when you’re 6, right? Because you’re you’re kind of done with it and you’re ready to move on. But aren’t we supposed to do we supposed to do like we’re like grass grade or something? I, ideally, yes, I mean. You don’t know everyone’s education level, right? And particularly depending on your audience, you know, or if it English as their first language or anything along those lines, right? So, um, you need to keep it easy for that, but also people don’t want to work that hard, right? Um, don’t make people work for it. Make it easy for them to do what it is that you want them to do, you know, and if that’s be invested in your organization in whichever way, if it’s volunteering, if it’s donating, if it’s doing whatever. Make it easy for them to do it, and don’t make them work hard to understand the story and what you’re saying. There’s a lot of industries that jargon is very common, and they tend to throw around acronyms or terms that make a lot of sense to the people involved, you know, like inside baseball, if you will, right? Um, but don’t mean anything to the general audience, and I think that’s one thing we have to try to catch. It’s like, you know, you aren’t speaking to yourself, you aren’t speaking to someone who has the same background and the same details and the same information that you do, uh, and you need to recognize that and you need to use a conversational manner and you need to use language that people are familiar with and that doesn’t mean. You know, you don’t co-opt, you know, you don’t need to kind of co-opt something and be someone who you are not. Still be who your organization is and have that consistent voice. But, you know, you don’t need to speak at like PhD level. I’m writing a dissertation style way to, you know, Joe from down the block, right? Uh, you need to speak in a way that your audience reacts well to and that they understand. You reminded me of, uh, when I was in law school, first year of law school. I hate, I, I, I, I hated practicing law, by the way. I don’t do it anymore, but I was very glad that I went to law school. I still am very glad I went, but your first year of law school, uh, now I went in, uh, 1989, so you, you’d be reading cases and I had literally my dictionary. My Black’s Law Dictionary by my side because every, you know, every paragraph there’s a word I don’t understand. There’s, you know, Latin phrase or something, you know, you don’t, you don’t want need people to be going, going to an online dictionary to get, you know, you don’t need to show off your extraordinarily literate vocabulary in your professional. Storytelling. Keep that to your friends. Because we, we kind of train people to do one thing in school and then you need another thing in real life, right? So in school, we kind of train people over time. You write longer, you use bigger words, you, you know, you do this, this, this, and so you start off, you know, I mean, my kid is in kindergarten, right? He’s writing like I saw. Sue run, you know, like that’s what he’s working on writing, you know, and then by the time you know you’re in college or you’re in grad school or law school or whatever it is, you know, you’re writing these long papers, right? You’re writing a dissertation, you know, and you use the, the big words and use the academic language and you use the insider terms because you have to do, you have to, that’s what you’re trained to do. That’s right. And then once you get out into like the real world. And I was like, I haven’t written anything that’s more than like 4 pages and I don’t even know how long, right? Because nobody wants to read all that. Like people want it short, succinct, like get to the point, what’s the summary, you know, if, if we do write something along, we always have that one page executive summary in the front, right? Because a lot of people are just like they don’t have the time for it and they don’t have the interest and their capability they don’t, you know, they’re not that invested in it that they’re gonna spend all this time. Digging through to find the gem that they need, right? They really need, they need some bullet points. They needed an executive summary. They need a story that they can remember and that sticks with them and makes sense, you know. And I mean, sure, you could do, I mean, when we talk about storytelling, there’s so many formats, right? I mean, you could really do a really long term, you could write, you could write a book, you could do a long term. Documentary, you know, those type of things. But most of the time when we’re talking about storytelling in this context, we’re talking about, you know, short hits, right? We’re talking about things that are, you know, like under 3 minute video, you know, that you can read in less than 10 minutes, a podcast, right, that you can listen to in a half hour. I mean, we’re really talking about shorter, more succinct, getting to the point. Stories. So you have to kind of like capture someone’s interest from the beginning, and keep it. I mean, the good thing is, I feel like that that is easier to do in a shorter time frame, right? But you have to get to the point faster. You don’t have a lot of runway to kind of meander around the point. I hope there’s still a place for longer form podcasting because we run like 45 minutes to an hour. But uh the good thing about podcasts to podcasts, people are frequently multitasking, you know, so I feel like you get a little more leeway for. Yeah, I hope. You know, I hope they’re not, I hope they’re not doing crossword puzzles or sudoku while they’re listening to Tony Martin and nonprofit radio because then you’re not gonna get the, you’re not gonna get the, the genius of Sarah Wood and other guests if you’re, if you’re too engaged in you’re multitask. So, you know, let’s dumb down the other, the, uh, the, the other part of the, the other tasks while you’re listening to. Nonprofit, you know, if you digest of the impressive. I bet there’s somebody out there who’s done it. I hope so. Oh, if there is, I’d love to know. Well listens to it. That’s what we should do a picture of your nonprofit and you can be a star. I’ll I’ll listener of the pages. Um, let’s talk, you know, the narwhal and the jellyfish. What’s the relationship between those two? Let’s talk about relationships. They are. OK. OK, BFF. It’s time for Tony’s Take 2. Thank you, Kate. The people who nobody thanks, you know, they kind of. silently breathe by us, and they are ignored by most people. I am encouraging you to give a simple thank you, a simple, have a good day. You know, it costs nothing, it’s, it’s, it’s a second. Um, and I’ve been trying to be conscious of this in my own. Mostly, mostly in traveling, uh, so, you know, I’m thinking about. Airport bathroom attendants. They’re keeping these bathrooms clean and like I said, they just come silently in and out, nobody gives them any mind. Say a quick thank you. That’s it. Just, thanks. They’ll get it, they’ll get it. Um, in hotels where you, when you get the, the free breakfasts, now this is not the breakfast that’s served to you, but, you know, I’m thinking of like the, uh, I use Marriott a lot. So like Fairfield, Resident Inn, Spring Hill Suites, you know, they have the free breakfasts, uh little tiny buffets. The folks that put that food out for you, thank you for breakfast. I, I, they’re so grateful to be thanked. Um, flight attendants, you know, flight, I, I, flight attendants, um, they come around and they offer you something and Lots of people don’t even remove their headsets or their AirPods, whatever, earbud, whatever, you know, whatever you got in your ear. And then, and then, and then you, you gotta ask the person, what did you say again, you know, you see them coming like remove the device from your ears so they don’t have to repeat themselves and then, and even some people don’t even give them the courtesy of that, they just They just kind of guess what’s being said, you know, you can usually tell if the court is there with, with the beverages, obviously, you know, it’s time for beverages and snacks, so they, they don’t really even hear and give the person the courtesy of Being listened to. Because they won’t, you know, the passengers won’t remove their devices. So you have a little courtesy, like pause your music or your movie and and actually listen to the person, hear them. Another one, restaurant, um, in restaurants now I think servers are, you know, waitresses, waiters, they’re, they’re generally thanked, I think. What about the people who fill your water in your coffee? They come around sometimes, it’s not the server that you’re, that you’re tipping. And we ignore them, you know, I see this when I see it with friends, I see it with donor lunches, but nobody says thank you for the, for the coffee refill or the water refill. A simple thank you, you know, like the arm is extended in, you know, and it’s just, it’s like it’s not even a person, it’s just an arm reaching in with a pitcher of water. These are people, say thanks and then carry on your conversation. It’s, it’s just that simple. Um, and also in restaurants, uh, the bus staff, people take your plates away. You know, again, it’s an arm, a couple of arms reach in and and and disappearing. They’re not disembodied. These are people. Thank you. Thanks for taking my plate. So, I’m being more conscious of this. Uh, I’m encouraging you to be. Maybe there are folks in your lives who come in and out and, you know, we’re treating them almost like they’re not human, like they don’t even exist, but they do. But you know, so it’s, it’s it’s uh, it’s not very thoughtful, it’s not at all generous to. They giving to to people who. You don’t have to say anything to, but I, I, I think we should. That’s Tony’s take too. Kate, I’m just gonna add a few to the list from my own life, um, Boston guards, we live near a school and you know they’re out there. Uh, making sure our kids are safe. Now, give them a very good one, right, and especially now, freezing out there for an hour or so. Crossing guards, excellent. Wait, you got others. And then also I was thinking shuttle staff, whether that’s like your buses, your trains, that also kind of has to do with your flight attendants, but the people transporting you to and from, give them a little wave. Yeah, yeah. My shuttle driver was actually really nice yesterday because I got off at the wrong stop, or I was going to get off at the wrong stop, but then I stayed on with her. She was like, you got off at the wrong stop, but you can stay with me and I’ll recircle. So she was really nice. See, they, they were people, yes, people are generally thoughtful and helpful and Uh, see, there, there was a very generous thing she did. So there you go, yeah, those are excellent, thank you. Excellent additions. Well, we’ve got Bou butt loads more time. Here’s the rest of Storytelling with Sarah Wood. Relationships, so, you know, how do we? How do we make sure these stories aren’t, you know, so complex? Like you’re, you’re, you were just talking about the length, you know, but. How do we make sure that we’re not including so much detail that the important things get buried? I mean, they’re in there, but they’re not coming out because we’ve got detail about the make another human story, you know, the person’s background or something we need to, we need to edit down, right? Absolutely, yeah, uh, I mean, I am a I always start with more than what I need, right? Um, because I’m like, I’m gonna have everything that I could possibly need when I’m, when I’m kind of crafting this and when I’m thinking about this. And also because I tend to be, even when I tell, even when I tell my stories, right? I, my personal stories, you know, I’m always putting too much information in too many details, and then sidetracking and be like, well, let me explain this part, you know, um, and so it really is, it really is the editing process, and you really do have to have a A standard process, I think for doing that. Um, and you can set that up in lots of different ways depending on your organization, but I think, you know, you can’t necessarily just have your first cut be a final product. Now, sometimes you can, sometimes you can catch some candid, you know, I mean, that’s become very popular now, right? Candid kind of just like impromptu, put your, put your phone up and, and grab a, a quick snippet of something. Um, so I’m not saying that you can’t do that, but I’m saying when you come to your more formal stories and the things you’re gonna be using for a longer period of time. That you’re gonna want us to kind of think that through, right? You might want to storyboard it out, um, you know, think about what your goals are going in, what are, what are the goals, what are the key topics that you want to hit, and then, you know, think further about how are you gonna do that, you know, what’s what best exemplifies what you were trying to share. You know, I mean, you also can, you can start from the story. You can have a great story, and then you can figure out how to use it. But I personally feel like it’s easier if you kind of start with your goals and then think through, OK, what kind of story best fits this? Who would be the best spokesperson, what is it that we want them to talk about? What are the key points that we want to get across. I think if you know that going in, it’s, it’s easier than kind of going back after the facts, um, and kind of shaping it, but it is possible to do it after the fact as well. All right, I’m gonna take a chance here because you said you, you, you tend to wander in your own storytelling, but you have something in your bio that’s very interesting that uh that you’re a single parent. So I’ve never seen that. chose to have children on their own. Um, so both of my children were conceived using donor sperm. Um, and they, they do not have a, a father in their life. Um, I have other family members, obviously, who kind of step up and friends and whoever and lots of loving people in their life. But, um, you know, I was a person who, I mean, this has something to do with communication, but I was a person who always I felt like my life would be unfulfilled without having children, and I did not feel that way about a relationship and or marriage or, or anything along those lines. Um, and so I opted to have them, you know, on my own and and raise them on my own. Um, and they are amazing little humans, and it was the best decision of my life because like they are the best thing I have, I have done, you know, I’ve created these amazing humans to kind of go out and make the world a better place. Um, and so that’s an, that’s an awesome experience. I mean, I was gonna say, I was gonna say, you know, I don’t try to talk people into doing things, right? But I will say if you are interested in in potentially doing it, I would advise you to explore it, right? And to look into your options because science is great. I, I work with a lot of health. Science nonprofits. And 11 of the reasons is I just like really think that there’s so many neat things that are happening now, right? That you couldn’t even potentially do years ago. I mean, I think the first, I think the first IVF baby was born around the time I was born. Um, so that’s give or take 40 years ago. Um, so it’s only potentially, I mean, my kids were not born through IVF. I used IUI, um, which is insider term, right? But because we have jargon jail on nonprofit, yes, but it doesn’t matter we’ll just say it’s less medically invasive. IUI IUI is interuterine insemination, um, and so it’s not as, uh, it’s not as technical. I didn’t have to have eggs frozen and retrieved and, and, and all of that. It just, you know, it’s kind of. They put some sperm on up there and right, right, yeah, yeah. And you double down on this now, so you have two children, 2 and 6. I do, I do. Yes. So one was one was not fulfilling your first, your son was not fulfilling enough. Well, I wouldn’t say it that way, right? I mean, if I had been unable to have another child, then yes, I would have been fulfilled with my son. But, uh, I had always wanted two children, and, um, I was at a spot where I could do that or try to do that. And Was able to be successful with that and so yeah, they. They’re awesome and I’m I’m like traditional spouse or partner is not a, I mean, I hope they would say I’m successful. I feel like I’m doing all right. I’m sure, yeah, we can’t yeah yeah yeah you know it’s interesting. I’ve never seen anyone that way as a Yeah, there’s a growing, there’s a growing community of us. There’s a growing community, you know, I think times are changing, right? And, and you can do things now that you couldn’t do in the past both with technology but also kind of being more socially accepted and you know, being a more tolerant society and. To, to families that are shaped differently and created differently. Um, and I think that’s an amazing thing. Um, I mean, you know, um, my sister is, um, married to a woman, and, uh, they obviously had to use sperm to, to have their child as well, use donor sperm, and, um, you know, they actually had to use a surrogate as well, uh, for health reasons. And so, you know, the. It’s just amazing that we get to have these children in our lives in these in these ways that, like I said, would not have been possible. You know, a couple decades ago, so in the adoption process, did, did you see any bias against a single parent? Well, I didn’t do adoption. I am saying? Oh no, no, I’m sorry. So in the, uh, yes, of course, of course. I’m sorry, that’s embarrassing. Um, but in so in the, in the, in the the process of being approved as a As a parent, whatever that requires, was, did you see any bias against being a single parent or we are in the fertility industry are are kind of well aware of, um, you know, kind of the single mom by choice, you know, it’s not, it’s not new to them. Uh, uh, they’re like they’re probably the in in the in group. I, you know, I will say, you know, it. You have to kind of be clear at like medical appointments and things like that, that you’re the only legal parent, you know, um, and all those kind of things, but I, I don’t think that’s really any different than Anyone who say had had, you know, a spouse pass away or, um, you know, otherwise was like not available in their life, um. But yeah, I mean, I don’t know. I don’t know what people are thinking in their head, but I will say that, you know, I haven’t felt bad about it and I haven’t had anyone like try actively try to make me feel bad about it. So I think that’s a plus, right? I mean, people might have their own thoughts, but if so, you know, if you don’t have anything nice to say, keep it to yourself, right? Yes, I was. I was wondering about like institutional bias or something, but it sounds like we’re past that. We’re we’re we’re past that. Well, I wouldn’t say that we are past that. I would say I have not personally experienced it or knowingly experienced it. Um, I think that, you know, it, I would not go so far to say that it does not exist. I mean, I think it certainly still exists and, uh, you know, probably maybe more dependent on, you know, the areas that you were in and your, and your localities and kind of, uh, their perspectives there, um. May play in a bigger part yeah. Um, so let’s let’s go back. Thank you for sharing the story. I thought that was a poignant part of your, right? Right. Well, you might say, well, I only third party, not my own, but it’s harder to tell, right? I mean, I think, you know, People tell stories all the time and I, it’s easy for me to look at someone else and think, OK, here’s the angle, here’s what makes you different, unique, here’s what we can kind of, you know, talk about, here’s what we can, you know, get some leverage, here’s, you know, all of that kind of thing. And when you try to apply it like to my own business, right? It’s, it’s much more complicated to do it with your own business and yourself, right? Because you, you kind of overthink it and. And impostor syndrome kind of pops up and, and also you kind of think like, oh, well, I can’t do it unless I’m really good at it, because, you know, I am in the field, like I feel like there, you know, there’s a benchmark that you kind of have to get over, right? You have to be like at least X is good about and really it’s not. Like you can try things out the same as anybody else and and do things in a different way, but it’s really getting out of your own way and getting out of your own head, um, and having enough mental energy left after you serve your clients to kind of apply the same principles to your own business. And you even you devolved into jargon in your own story. I did you spotted it. You did, you did self-identify too, but I, I would, I would have called you out because we do have jargon jail, but I didn’t, I didn’t need to. Um, so you, something you mentioned, uh. We we were earlier, uh, consistency, messaging consistency, like I think like tone of your stories, you, you know, you said the, uh, the narwhal and the jellyfish, like they have, there’s clearly a pattern. You, you expect the puns, etc. Let’s talk about the value and, and, and how you ensure consistency in, in nonprofit messaging. Yeah, I always tell people, you need to know who you are first, right? And you need to decide as an organization, this is who we are, this is what we do, and this is how we talk about it, um, because it’s gonna be confusing for your audience if your emails are written in one way in one tone, and then your website is a copy is in a completely different tone and your social media is in, in, in, you know, a third one, and just, you need to pick one which is realistic, which feels like it. Works for you, which feels honest, um, and also want a voice that resonates with your audiences, and then you need to stick with it, um, because you don’t want to have mismatch between what you’re saying in one place versus another. And also you need to. When we talk about consistency, it’s not just being the same but it’s consistency and kind of the cadence, right? It’s I we’re consistently telling our stories we’re consistently talking about what we’re doing we’re consistently, you know, emphasizing what are the most important parts for us. So it’s both how often you’re doing it, and it’s making sure that it’s kind of similar, that there’s a similar vein, right? Of course you’re gonna alter things depending on like what format you’re doing it in. If you’re writing a case study, it’s gonna be different than, you know, if you’re doing. And Instagram reel, right? Uh, you’re not gonna do those the same way. They’re not gonna exactly have the same vibe and the same language and and all of that because they’re very different styles for different audiences, but you want overall your voice to be consistent. Your key messages across the board should be consistent. Your values should be evident and consistent across wherever you happen to be. And then like I said, you know, telling people. You have to tell people over and over and over again what you do. It is really hard to overcommunicate with people as a nonprofit organization. I mean, you’re inside, you’re embedded in it, you’re you may be tired of talking about it, right? You may be like, oh, we’ve done this so many times or, or we’ve told this story and so many times in so many ways and and all of that, but the reality is, you know, you see every message your audience does not. They’re gonna miss a lot of the messages that you’re putting out. Yes, that’s a very good point. They’re not seeing every message that you send. Exactly. And they’re not seeing it kind of the way you are, right, where, you know, it shows up like, you know, back to back to back to back, right? All the message you might send, like, here’s, here’s all your emails in a row of what you’ve sent or here’s all your, like, you know, when you’re looking at the back end of it, they don’t see it like that, right? It’s, it’s all this other stuff in between, you know, that they’re seeing. So I, I try to tell people I I feel like. Nonprofit organizations in particular, they’re worried about like annoying people, right? They’re worried about, um, kind of irritating them and then, oh, they’re just gonna like, you know, unsubscribe or unfollow us or they’re not gonna wanna do this, that and whatever. And I was like, it is really hard to annoy someone so much that they’re gonna opt out unless you are really just spamming, right? And like you’re, but if you’re providing content that is of value, and you, I mean, they might. See 1 in 10 of the things you do, right? I mean, I, I don’t have the actual data on that, right? Like, you know, but they, they are certainly not gonna see every single message that you send out. And then if they do, great. I mean, and if they are seeing every single message and they come to you and they say, you’re sending too many. I’ve seen all of these or whatever, like, let’s figure out a way so that that that particular individual, you know, doesn’t maybe doesn’t get quite so much of it. But I mean, I think that’s, it’s hard to do and. That’s something that nonprofits kind of have to get out of their own way on, is they’re worried, like, oh, we’re gonna annoy them, they’re gonna unsubscribe. If, if they’re gonna unsubscribe because, you know, they got Or end of year email like fundraising ask, then they weren’t someone who should have been on your list in the first place, right? Because they aren’t someone who’s like regularly invested in your organization. If they’re gonna be, you know, I mean how many emails does Target send me? Like how much like I haven’t unsubscribed from them yet, you know, like, I mean, now, do I delete most of them without opening them? Yes. But I mean, I, most nonprofits are not saying anywhere near the volume, right? That, you know, a target or or someone along those lines is sending. That’s consistent with uh advice around boards and utilizing your board, being afraid that you’re asking your board to do too much. If, if that happens, they’ll they’ll let you know. But odds are you’re not asking them to do enough and they’re feeling like they’re, you know, kind of a lackluster board member because they’re, they’re not engaged enough with. hopefully the right kinds of tasks you know they don’t know what to do, right? I mean, I think, I think that’s common, right, is that, you know, when someone joins a board and they’re very, or a volunteer or or or however they’re joining, however they’re, you know, being involved with the organization, they want to help, but they don’t necessarily like know how to go about that or they don’t want to step on someone’s toes, you know. And, or kind of take over what someone else is doing. And so I think the more information that you can provide internally as well, right? Not just externally, um, about what is most helpful, like, you know, don’t just leave people hanging. Like, ask them for what you need. And I know it feels awkward. We all hate, like, you know, we all hate asking for things and, um, That’s why some people who are like, you know, major fundraisers who really are OK with it, get, get paid more, right? Um, but it can feel awkward until you get used to it, right? And once you do it, and you see like, OK, you see the reaction, you see that it is a positive reaction. You know, you’re not getting the negativity that you thought you were gonna get. Um, I think that it’s easier to do it the next time, right? And, and it becomes, it becomes routine, and it’s no longer hard for you to do. Don’t be afraid of your board members. Don’t be afraid of your, your volunteers, your donors, whether they’re your major donors or your audience in general, right? Don’t, don’t be afraid of them and don’t be afraid to talk to them and to ask them things and you know, you might get crickets, they might not respond back, but, um, give them the opportunity, you know, give them the opportunity to engage and and to connect with you and to communicate and to let you know what it is they’re most interested in. Um, and, and not hearing back doesn’t mean that they don’t like you, means that they, they’re time constrained and, you know, they didn’t, they didn’t read that particular ask or they didn’t, they didn’t have the time to respond to it or they just chose not to. You know, it doesn’t mean that they don’t like you when, when they start unsubscribing, that’s when they don’t like you. Yeah, so they don’t, don’t default to thinking negatively, right? You know, um, if no one responded, then it’s just as just as likely that they responded positively as they did negatively, right? Probably more likely because I think people are more likely to actually let you know if they have a negative reaction to something than if they have a positive reaction to something. Um, I mean, we see that in online reviews all the time, right? Uh, the people who leave the review a lot of times are the people who have like a really bad experience for whatever reason, um, because most people who have like an OK or positive, you know, experience are just kind of like going about with their day. What else do you want to talk about around storytelling that uh either I haven’t asked you or we didn’t go deep enough. What else is out there? What’s on your mind? What’s on your mind? We’ve covered a lot of, um. I think maybe talking a little bit about kind of like how you pick the stories. I mean, we touched on this a little bit about how You know, how it’s important to kind of go in knowing what you want to get out of it. Um, but you may, if you aren’t used to storytelling, you may kind of be looking at your organization. I’m like, well, I don’t have any stories to tell, and that is like. Oh, that’s, that’s definitely wrong. You shouldn’t be, you shouldn’t be in business if you don’t, if you can’t come up with half a dozen stories, like sort of off the top of your head. Well, I mean, let’s not say it like that because for some people, you know, they just haven’t learned how to see it in that way yet, right? It’s the, the stories are there. You have, maybe I was being harsh, but you have. You just have to identify them. All right, so help us, help us, help us do that. All right. So I think you, I think you’re gonna, like I said, you can start with your kind of the goals of like, you know, this is what I really would like to have a story talking about or this is what I would like to have a story that there’s an example of. Um, and having that in mind can kind of help you when you’re looking at it can kind of like frame it and kind of shape how you’re looking at what you’re doing. Um, so that’s one way to go about it. I think another way to go about it is, um, to kind of train yourself and your staff to think about things through the lens of a story, right? So, so many times we’ll have, uh, you know, people they’re like, Oh, I don’t have enough, I don’t have enough content for social media, or I don’t have this. And I was like, OK, well, What does your staff say? You know, what is your staff doing like day to day, you know, are you asking them like, OK, what is there we could take a picture of? What is there we could take a video of? Could we do a behind the scenes of like what their day is like, you know, um, when someone comes in, have you asked them like what to give a testimonial of some sort? Have you asked them for their feedback, you know, those are always That you can kind of gather things that can kind of turn into stories. Uh, I think, uh, I worked for an organization for a while and they had been around like 90 years, right? And they’ve been running these programs for like 90 years. And, you know, so in all that time, there’s so many people that had been involved with it, right? And we really had to kind of create a program where they were like reaching out to like alumni of this program, right? Um, and kind of talking to them and doing blogs, a blog series and, you know, using that to then spin off and repurpose into like other, other storytelling content, right? But they just hadn’t thought about it, right? Like no one had just sat and thought like, OK, well, we should reach out to, you know, it’s been this amount of time, like they’ve done all these like different things. Like, it’s not like they’re still in high school. This was particular program was aimed at like middle and high school kids, um, you know, and, and some of them were like famous. So, you know, it was a matter of just like letting people know to think about it in that way, you know, because the stories are there. That’s one of the reasons I really like working with nonprofit organizations is because there are so many good stories that are just like right there for the bank, right? It’s not like you’re having to like create it. Anything else that you want to share? I don’t want you to give uh give nonprofit radio listeners, you know, like short shrift, I would want to just encourage everyone that everyone can be a storyteller and that the and that everyone has a story, right? So when you’re looking at your organization, think about what stories would be most effective for you, um, and how you can share them in a way that will resonate with your audience the most. And that’s the way I think you can best approach it, because otherwise it can feel overwhelming, and you want it to feel approachable, and you want it to feel like something that you can accomplish. Sarah Wood Founder and chief communication consultant Sarah Wood Communication, you’ll find Sarah on LinkedIn. You’ll find her practice at Sarah with an H, Sara Woodcommunication.com. Thank you very much, Sarah. Thanks for sharing your own personal story as well as all the uh valuable advice on. Nonprofit storytelling. Thank you very much. I hope somebody goes out and tells a story because of this. Many folks will, I’m sure. Next week, your grant maker relationships. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you. Find it at Tony Martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by DonorBox, outdated donation forms blocking your supporters’ generosity. Donor box, fast, flexible, and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit, Donorbox.org. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer Kate Martignetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit Radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Come out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for December 16, 2024: Looking To 2025: Is It Paranoia Or Prudence?

Gene Takagi & Amy Sample Ward: Looking To 2025: Is It Paranoia Or Prudence?

Our esteemed contributors share what they’re looking to next year, with the uncertainty of a new president and administration. On the table is HR 9495, which some call the NonprofitKiller; government agencies no longer given deference by the federal courts, with the Supreme Court overruling the long-standing Chevron Doctrine; and, uneasiness around the economy rippling out to preemptive nonprofit budget cuts. Our legal contributor is Gene Takagi at NEO Law Group. Amy Sample Ward, CEO of NTEN, is our technology contributor.

Gene Takagi

 

 

 

 

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite abdominal podcast. This is our last show of the year. I’ll have more to say about that. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d bear the pain of a para nia if you pointed out to me that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate with what’s up this week? Hey, Tony, we have looking to 2025. Is it paranoia or Prudence? Our esteemed contributors share what they’re looking to next year with the uncertainty of a new president and administration on the table is hr 9495, which some call the nonprofit killer government agencies no longer given deference by the federal courts with the Supreme Court overruling of the long-standing Chevron doctrine and uneasiness around the economy rippling out to pre-emptive nonprofit budget cuts. Our legal contributor is Gene Takaki at Neo Law Group, Amy Sample Ward CEO of N 10 is our technology contributor on Tony’s two. Our last show of the year and timely holiday wishes were sponsored by donor box outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor. Box.org here is looking to 2025. Is it paranoia or Prudence? It’s a pleasure to welcome back Gene Takagi and Amy Sample Ward for our final show of 2024. Gene is our legal contributor and principal of Neo, the nonprofit and exempt organization’s Law Group in San Francisco. He edits the wildly popular nonprofit law blog.com and is a part time lecturer at Columbia University. The firm is at Neola group.com and he’s at GTC A AMP award, our technology contributor and CEO of N 10. They were awarded a 2023 Bosch Foundation fellowship and their most recent co-authored book is the tech that comes next about equity and inclusiveness in technology development. They’re at Amy Sample ward.org and at Amy RS Ward Gene and Amy. Thank you for your contributions through the year and welcome to the final show of 2024. We made it sounds like drudgery. No, I’m just saying like it, you know, here we are, we made it all the way to the end of 2020 four. All right, thanks. OK. She says it, they say it with a smile. So thank you. Thank you. It sounded like uh it might have been a laborious chore, but no, hopefully not. I’m I’m sure not. All right. And one thing maybe Tony that, that will spur talking about what we might foresee in the future is that change in social media handles. As many of us are migrating to blue sky and to other. Exactly. But just thought, I chime in with that quickly, we can, we can talk about the, the, the seasonal migration. I, I am slow to adopt new networks. But uh yes, I, I’ve started being active on uh on blue sky as well. Indeed. All right. Uh We wanna start with something that, uh, both of you have seen me post about and has been getting a lot of attention, uh, for months before I joined, before this, uh, came within my ken if you will, uh, which is ho House Resolution hr 9495. Uh, in the Senate. It is, uh, 4136. It is the stop terror financing and tax penalties on American Hostages Act. Uh, J uh, I don’t know, terror financing and not penalizing people who were held hostage for paying their taxes late. I mean, those, those both sound like very worthwhile endeavors for the government to do. Uh, especially I’m thinking of hostages who may not have filed their 1040 on time. I mean, I think, I think being held hostage is, uh, uh, a legitimate reason for not having paid your taxes and then the penalties that would have ensued on top of that. So, II, I think that’s a fair, uh, but it’s the, uh, it’s the stop terror financing part that is, uh, rankling nonprofit organizations, the nonprofit community generally. Um, what, what is it about this house resolution? It passed the house. It’s now in the Senate, I guess I’ll just set up the, the, the, the, uh, timing of the thing. So, uh, it’s unlikely to be taken up in the current Senate. I mean, it’s possible but it’s not likely, uh, having passed the house. Uh, but we have a new Senate, uh, beginning on, um, January 3rd and, uh, that Senate could very well take up hr 9495 Senate 4136. What’s, uh, what, what’s the, uh, what’s the issue here for the nonprofit community? Gene? So, II, I think when we take a look at the name of the bill, this is the game of politics that some of us get frustrated with. Right. So who could be against stop terror financing? Of course, nobody wants to, it’s worthy and it’s worthy and benign. But what does it actually say about how we stop terror financing? What are the checks and balances? Can anybody just say you are supporting terror and that’s it. You are like, shut down. Do you get executed for doing that? I mean, so we, we need to look into the bill and I think the first time this bill came across was actually, um, late last year, Tony, it was under a different name. Uh, it was hr 64 08 in the house and it passed 382 to 11. So I don’t think a lot of the legislators got past the name of the bill and then they decided, hey, we’re going to pass this because how can our constituents see us oppose a bill against supporting terror? Of course, we are, are for, you know, stopping terror financing and the hostages too. Don’t forget the, the, the late, the late filings for the, for the hostages. And that’s the other part of politics, right? Is we bundle things together so that you’re trapped, right? There’s no kiss to, to, to promoting that bill. But here’s, here’s why it’s, it’s scary for, for the nonprofit sector. The addition in the bill, the, the part that’s not to do with hostages is about the Secretary of the Treasury having the discretion alone to strip the tax exempt status of an organization because they feel like they are supporting a terrorist organization, they are providing material support or resources to a terrorist organization. And if they deem that to be the case, they give 90 days notice to the organization, they should supply some evidence of that support um, or resources unless it’s a national secret or it’s not in the best interests of the government to do so. In which case, it could all be done in secret. It could just be, we’re taking away your 501 C three status because we’ve decided that you are supporting terror a terrorist organization, give us 90 days to prove that you’re not in return any money that, that, you know, you sent out to the terrorist organization that we might not really tell you much about. Um, and what is all of that mean? I mean, so now as we sort of dig into how this might be impacted and how, uh, an executive branch might use this particular bill to attack organizations or even if they don’t use it broadly how it will just chill free speech across the sector. There’s already organizations terrified with this bill and afraid to speak up on things like, um, the Palestinian people in Gaza, which is sort of what prompted the bill in the first place. Right. But, you know, now they’re thinking, oh my gosh, can we speak about reproductive rights? Can we speak about other things? Are we going to be called a terrorist organization or a supporter of a terrorist organization? And what if the organization we were supporting wasn’t branded a terrorist organization at the time, but later was declared by some other entity or some other agency to be a terrorist organization. Now, do they go back and do they ding us on that as well? And I won’t go too far down the line. But humanitarian aid is another huge issue to, to talk about later. But let me, let me stop there. Well, even even on the domestic side, suppose you are supporting the, uh, the civil rights or the legal rights of people who protest openly in the streets, uh, about anything that, that we have a right to seek redress from our, from our federal government around. So you’re, then those protesters are perhaps arrested, um, and charged and you give legal support, you give material legal support to those, to those charged. Are, are those, are those folks deemed domestic terrorists? That’s another thing, the bill does not distinguish between federal or domestic, sorry, between domestic or foreign. Uh, are you now giving material support to domestic terrorists who were exercising their first amendment rights of assembly and speech in the streets? And so now you’re, now you, this legal aid society are a, uh, terrorist supporting organization. So there’s an opportunity. Um, it’s just the, the, the bill is vague on standards. In fact, I think it’s, it’s silent on the standards for being deemed a terrorist supporting organization. It’s, it’s at the Secretary of the Treasury’s uh discretion, what is deemed a terrorist supporting organization? And that vagueness is critical. I don’t want to overstate it, Tony, because I’ve seen on various other podcasts. People are making more into this bill than is actually there. So to be a terrorist supporting organization that could be subject to being stripped of tax exempt status. You have to be accused, uh, or, or charged with, um, the designation that you are supporting a terrorist organization. And the terrorist organization is defined in other sections of the bill, the bill is very hard to read because it starts to refer to other places in the code where you could be described as a terrorist organization. So if you give support, material support or resources to that terrorist organization that’s typically been defined by somebody else, some other branch of the government, um, usually with a little bit more, you know, some people have been mistaken about this saying that the legislature had to define you as a terrorist organization. That’s not quite true. There are other sort of members of the executive branch that could still define you as a terrorist organization. If they have, then the secretary of the Treasury has the ability to say you supported them, but they’ve got to be on some list of a terrorist organization. So protesters on the street, if you’re supporting them in their legal aid, unless they are deemed part of a terrorist group that’s been identified as a terrorist organization, then that won’t apply. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money but also supports you in retaining your donors, a partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location. So you can grow your impact faster. That’s donor box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers, just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability. Your organization needs helping you, help others visit donor box.org to learn more. Now, back to looking to 2025 is it paranoia or prudence? Suppose they’re supporting Black Lives Matter in their local city and Black Lives Matter has been deemed a terrorist support, a terrorist organization. I mean, we, we, uh, by some, by some other agency as you’re, as you’re describing, that doesn’t seem outside the realm of possibility. The, the claim could be that Black Lives Matter members as if there’s as if there’s like a, a strict membership list or something. But let’s just use the, the worst possible instincts of uh the federal government uh are, are, you know, they, uh they, they uh they create crime in mayhem and they burn buildings. Well, it sounds like a domestic terror organization to us that other agency has determined. And now the, the uh the legal aid society uh is providing uh material support to a terrorist organization. Doesn’t that, isn’t that within the realm of possibility and plausibility? It kind of is Tony, it’s not really kind of projected right now that this is going to be focused on domestic terrorism. It seems like the executive branch doesn’t actually want to identify domestic organizations as terrorist organizations because many of them support the, the, the current administration, uh those who, who were responsible for the insurrection, for example, on January 6th. So the focus here right now is on foreign terrorism. That’s sort of the identified groups, um, that, um, if you support foreign terrorist organizations that seems to be the focus but it doesn’t mean that they couldn’t go down the route that you’re talking about. Terror. Does the, does the bill? I thought the bill was silent on foreign versus domestic terror. It doesn’t define it except through references to other sections of the code which are focused on foreign terrorist organizations. So, you know, it doesn’t mean they can’t expand it. It doesn’t mean that maybe the Secretary of the Treasury couldn’t interpret terrorist supporting to, to give themselves a little bit more power to say, hey, this is a terrorist group as well. But I, I think that would be something that, that would not be, I, there’s, there’s lots of law already where the executive branch can do far worse than under what they have in 9495. So the first thing to know is 9495 takes away tax exempt status. It does not stop you from operating, it just takes away 501 c three status or 5014 C four, whatever. But doesn’t stop you from operating, they have tools that can stop you from operating. They can criminalize you if they say you’re terror supporting same words, terrorist supporting. There are other laws which is why we go, well, why this law, why did this law come up? There’s already other laws that prevent you from supporting terror and the reason in my mind is they’re going to use this not as the hammer but as the chisel to silence dissent. So they’re gonna chisel away at certain organizations scare everybody else at it. And that’s, that’s gonna be the impact. So rather than like take down all these protesters or like a whole movement of civil rights organizers think they’re going, what they’re going to do is they’re going to the target. Why this bill came about was because of what’s happening in Palestine and Gaza and the support that um some of those organizations have given to the Palestinian cause they’re gonna use that and they’re gonna scare everybody else from, from speaking out on it. And I think that is the danger, the real danger of 9495 because there are other laws where they can strip away your 501 C three status for acting against public policy. There are other laws that say, hey, we can criminalize your leaders for supporting terror. There’s a whole bunch of worse things they can do. This is the lighter touch, which is a terrible light touch, but this is the lighter touch that might be more useful to an administration that wants to attack dissent, prior restraint on speech, self censorship, correct. Amy. What, what are you, what are you thinking? Yeah, I think that we’ve seen a lot of organizations feeling concerned about this. Um Actually for Gene’s point, not necessarily for the, you know, your organization is or eradicated and no longer exists. But what does this mean for how organizations position themselves, talk to their community, who they talk to, you know, the, the feeling that this is kind of um chilling the sector on building power and trying to work together. Versus um as jean said, there’s, there’s already options that if, you know, the government wanted to completely remove an organization, there are already ways that they could do that. Um But this feels both the, the timing where it’s come from, you know, how, how it came in response to organizations really trying to make more visible conversations about um Palestine, even not about Palestine, but even just organizations trying to say, you know, our, our government is complicit in so many harms around the world. Um And that, what does that mean for nonprofit organizations who felt like that is maybe not their explicit mission? Like to your example before they’re not a legal aid organization, they’re not a humanitarian aid organization, but they wanted to be um in the conversation with their community and acknowledging that there’s a lot going on in the world and even trying to acknowledge that maybe feels like it’s risky for them or what does it mean to be in a partnership with a lot of other organizations? Again, even on a different topic? But what does that association mean? And, and are we not able to collaborate across the sector because of perceptions, you know, gene, anything more we wanna say about uh 9495. Maybe, actually, instead of the substance, maybe some things that some of the organizations that are speaking out against the Bill Council on foundations, uh independent sector, the National Council on nonprofits. Those three and one other organization have a joint statement against the Bill. The advice that I’ve seen a lot is contact your senators. Thanks Tony. It’s since it’s passed the house, I think that’s sort of where the immediate fight is, is with the Senate. And um even if the the majority of the Senate changes, um uh next year, as you, as you noted, Tony, um there are, you know, possibilities of a filibuster by the democratic senators if they so feel like this is something that they can stand up on again again, the rhetoric and the naming of the bill. Um and how much constituents are paying attention to the actual details. I know a lot of nonprofit folks are, but, you know, the general population may not be looking past the title of the bill. And so if their representative is saying I’m voting against this when the exact same bill was there before with like a 95 or 97% vote for it, trying to, to explain that um might be hard. So while there’s hope for, you know, for some that the Senate uh might have a filibuster and not approve this, um or listen to the public if there’s enough of an uproar um across party lines, um, that, that, that maybe they don’t do it. So the, the immediate thing is yes, advocate against the bill. The second thing is make sure you’re informed about what this bill does and doesn’t, again, really a lot of misinformation out there right now and people are scrambling, they’re like trying to create subsidiaries, they’re trying to create LLC S to throw, you know, assets in just in case they lose their 501 C three status because they’re thinking that this bill will shut them down completely. Uh Again, not just lose 501 C three status and prevent them from operating, freeze their assets. That’s not what this bill does. Again, there’s other tools that, that the federal government or even state government already have that can do that, but they haven’t used it in the past. So it’s hard to say Tony, we, we may be in for New Times and really just egregious uses of these, these laws. Um but it may be premature to make huge decisions unless you’re really well informed about them. So I, I would say for, for people looking at this bill, don’t just listen to all the sort of the talk that’s out there right now, like sit down and really get well informed about this, listen to nonprofit radio because we will thank you because we will continue talking about it. Of course. Yeah. All right. Um, good, thank you. Context, context understanding. Let’s talk about, uh, something else that’s on your mind for, uh, watching in 2025 something that came out many months ago. Uh, Gene, which was the, uh, overruling of what, what’s commonly called the, the Chevron Doctrine where government agencies get a lot of deference in the courts when the issue is interpretation of regulations, uh, rules, uh, that, that doctrine of, of deference to those government experts uh was overruled by the Supreme Court was the middle of this year or so. Can you uh explain why this is concerning? Yeah, so it doesn’t, it’s kind of this sort of lawyer geeky thing that goes on, but it’s, it’s important to take a step back and say, hey, the legislator makes statutory laws, right? But the laws are full of like empty spaces for there to be, there needs to be regulation about how to implement these laws. And so like the different agencies including like the Treasury Department and the IRS um start to make regulations. Um and these regulations interpret the law in ways to enforce the law in a practical way. And it’s a lot of law uh and agencies like the EPA the Environmental Protection Agency will take kind of the meaning of the law and sort of all of the legislative history behind it and try to create regulations. They put out the regulations for notice and public comment and then they draft final regulations after that, taking into account those comments, hopefully taking those into account. The courts feel like these regulatory agencies use scientists like the EPA or, or experts, policy experts in creating these regulations. Um And now when a company like Chevron wants to sue uh and say these regulations are unfair, the court used to have to defer or provided deference under the Chevron deference doctrine that hey, we are going to defer to the expertise of the agencies when they created those regulations. And that’s why that is the deference. You have to prove to us if you’re the company saying, hey, no, this doesn’t really pollute or this doesn’t really affect our public health. Let’s let’s like con continue to produce this stuff um because we need it for other things. Um So now this deference is lost. So the courts can’t give deference and now they have to just weigh everything out in balance. The courts are not scientists, right? They’re not scientific experts, the scientific experts were consulted with in creating the regulations, which is why you defer to them. Now, we’ve lost that. So this is a big thing. Another reason why people were very concerned about the composition of the Supreme Court because there seems to be more or or less deference to kind of what, what public agencies see and more susceptibility to what corporations and people of wealth have, who can actually fight these and go to court all the way to the Supreme Court because they have a huge litigation war chest to work behind. It’s time for Tony’s take two. Thank you, Kate. Here we are. End of December. It’s the last show of 2024. It, it, I don’t know, it doesn’t creep up. It just, it just comes fast. I think end of the year, I hope your end of the year fundraising all important is, uh going well. Hope you have a bang up last couple of weeks of the year. I hope you get where you need to be fundraising wise. And then I hope you can take time off for family friends and yourself, you need rest. Here comes the finger wag. Take care of yourself. You gotta take care of yourself before you can take care of others. So I hope you will do that over the holidays, whatever that looks like for you, do it, take care of yourself so you can come back refreshed in the new Year this time. Uh Unlike Thanksgiving, good holiday wishes, whatever holiday you celebrate Happy New Year, these holiday wishes come on time. Not uh not the week after like uh like we saw with Thanksgiving. Unbelievable. I hope you enjoy your time off. I hope you enjoy your holidays. Happy New Year and we will see you in 2025 K happy holidays. Everyone spend it with family and we’ll see you in 2025. We’ve got VU but loads more time, here’s the rest of looking to 2025. Is it paranoia or prudence with Gene and Amy? The presumption of expertise in the, in our vast federal agency bureaucracy uh is, is no, is no longer. And so that it’s, it’s interesting, the, the standard uh one standard was, is arbitrary and capricious that uh that the interpretation or that the regulation is arbitrary and it’s so arbitrary that it, it, it uh is contrary to what Congress intended. And so that regulation should be ignored. And you know, we the company challenging it shouldn’t be held to its standards. Now. It seems like arbitrariness is, is welcome because any interpretation uh has potential validity in the courts, if you can persuade a judge and maybe in some cases, a jury, I think a lot of these would be bench trials with Ju ju with judge judges. But whatever, if you can, if you can persuade the finder of fact that uh that your interpretation, however arbitrary it might be is more appropriate than you could prevail. So it’s bringing arbitrariness and capriciousness into it’s welcoming arbitrariness and, and uh fringe theories as having potential merit. Now, they may not prevail but they’ll, they’ll, they’ll at least get a hearing. Now. Think about this too, Tony. The company that wants to bring the lawsuit to challenge the validity of the regulation might get to choose the court in which to file the complaint right. So they often go to Texas, um and they get a court that is favorable to, to maybe to, to corporate powers and, and uh not believers of climate change and, and you know, so they can choose the forum and forum shopping can be really problematic and, you know, with, with the end of Chevron deference, more arbitrariness, you can, you can file your case in any of the federal districts throughout the country that you think would be most favorable. That’s absolutely correct. Amy’s head, their head is bobbing with disbelief and I mean, I can only hit it against the desk so many times per day, you know, without a crude, the bumps aren’t showing a hat on, you know. Well, you have your hat protection but it’s also, it’s early in the pacific time, still several hours left in the day. Like the Grinch right now, Tony. No, there, there’s, there’s cause for concern. Um, the, the, the, uh, the composition of the court, the Supreme Court has enormous sway over, uh, over our, our laws, our culture just, you know, our, our lives. So these are a couple of instances we’re gonna turn to Amy. I’m probably not going to make anything sound better than g, well, it’s not a competition. I know I just, all arbitrary. I thought you were like wanting to pick up the tone, you know, but all arbitrary and capricious opinions are welcome. Your, your opinions are not neither arbitrary nor capricious. Um but uh you are hearing from folks about their concern about the, the, the potential of a, of a, a changed economy, uh marketplace and uh potential fundraising impacts. What, what are you, what are you hearing from folks? You, you have your ear to the ground? Yeah, I mean, you know, I think everyone, at least in the US, I’m sure you have listeners elsewhere thanks to the internet but have spent, I don’t know how much of our lives over the last election cycle. Constantly hearing about the economy, constantly hearing about tariffs, constant, all of these things about the market. And it doesn’t matter if any of them are real or not or have already happened or maybe one day gonna happen, it doesn’t matter. It means there’s now a real air of uncertainty about what’s gonna happen to the economy. And unfortunately, in the nonprofit sector, we know that the winds of the economy shifting also shift philanthropy and how they may have a more conservative view over their own um corpus and, and what they want to spend. And of course, that means then for the nonprofits, you know, are we competing even harder for fewer funds? Are funders kind of back to the first piece of this conversation in 9495 are funders not wanting to be seen resourcing organizations who talk about certain political situations. Um, you know, it just has created a lot of uncertainty and what, you know, we’re hearing from organizations is, um, of course, when there was a lot of uncertainty in 2020 the pandemic was shifting, everything, organizations didn’t, you know, know how to adjust organizations were laying staff off or sh you know, all of those big shifts meant the things that were really quick to go was no professional development spending, no technology spending, no training. And those were also the resources that would have allowed organizations to adjust and to be nimble and to know how to continue moving through these really um confusing or, or unpredictable times. And so I think because folks who already experienced that once they’re starting to feel like, oh my gosh, if funding is uncertain, if how we’re operating is uncertain, we can’t let go of some of our tools and training and resources that allow us to think and adjust and, you know, make really, really maybe quick but strategic choices instead of reactionary choices that maybe we experienced before, you know, and had to learn the hard way that, oh, we don’t just do everything on zoom or whatever it might be, you know. Um And I think coupled with that, with some of these uh talked about threats to a lot of different communities. Organizations are also feeling like, you know, are our system secure. Do we know what data we have and which communities, it might compromise if it was either demanded of us from the government. Or hacked and stolen from us? You know, what, what duties do we have as an organization that serves communities who are in the process of, you know, getting documentation or a path to citizenship? What if we have data on these folks because they’re in our services and in our programs, are we vulnerable as an organization? And also are we maybe making them vulnerable by having their data? And how do we think about that? You know, how do we prepare our systems to be um ready to navigate maybe threats or challenges that come up? So I think it’s a lot, it’s also December and everybody is tired and wants to put up that out of office on their email and just like take a break, which absolutely you should do, you are entitled to, to take that break. But I think folks are feeling really worried about what’s ahead and not totally prepared, you know, to know how to, how to navigate it yet. Yeah, uncertainty. We, we don’t, we don’t, we don’t do well in uncertain environments whether they’re financial, physical, whether, you know, we don’t uh it doesn’t matter. We, we um uncertainty is unsettling. Um I will say some of what you described. I, I don’t, I don’t want to uh promote paranoia, but some of that introspect, introspection and self evaluation, you know, it has value too, 0 100% and data security resilience, right? And those are not new things you know, any day of the year, any year it is. If you came to N 10, we would say, hey, do you know what data you have on your community? And do you know where it’s stored? And do you know if it’s secure, you know, these aren’t new things for us to talk about. But I think they are very new things for some organizations to think about in their systems and actually like put into place, you know, even if they’ve maybe had a more theoretical conversation about, oh, you know, do we wanna answer community questions through Facebook D MS? You know, that’s probably not safe, let’s not do that but didn’t then have the rest of the conversation of OK, well, what data do we have on those folks? What, which systems is it in? Do we know how we’re maintained? You know, and the uncertainty of what’s the common kind of threats to so many different communities that, you know, are maybe part of a lot of different missions is forcing I think folks to think about the whole rest of the equation instead of just that first part that that’s maybe where they focused in the past. I thought a lesson that came from the the pandemic was that we, we not make financial decisions that are short sighted, like, you know, cutting professional development and technology, but rather that we go to our supporters with our needs and how the, how the uh the, the missions may have grown, the, the program work may have expanded because of, in that case, the pandemic. Uh and you know, our need is so much greater rather than making the, the short sighted, you know, cuts. I think that we could say there are a lot of lessons from 2020 that we should still have and that we can point to people on learning investments in racial equity investments in equitable practices, investments in staff. Yes, absolutely. I heard many promises in 2020 about all of these things. I heard many folks say they learned those lessons and here we are folks, you know, one of, one of the biggest job areas that has turned over is any equity related title, right? People have eliminated those positions or eliminated the people in those positions. Like there are lots of lessons that I wish were deeply learned and you’re talking about one of them. But I think what we’re hearing is that organizations haven’t deeply learned that and folks are already feeling the crunch of ok. Well, we probably can’t come to the conference. We probably can’t do that course we pro because we know that’s gonna be what gets eliminated from the budget. What are you, what are you thinking? I would just add kind of on the funding issue. You know, we’ve got um um Lan and Vivek who are supposed to like get rid of $2 trillion of the federal budget, they want to eliminate head, smart head start. Um And uh just so many other programs they want to cut down on Social Security and Medicare. So, you know, there’s a lot of people who um justifiably are scared right now and um and know that their missions will, that are already operating in more demand than they can meet, it will only accelerate. Yeah, and not a lot of answers yet. So, um I, I offer everybody my own. Not that it means anything but a little bit of grace at this period because it’s, it’s, it’s tough times right now and a lot of, lot of fear and I think I don’t have a solution necessarily. I don’t think that Gene or you Tony are trying to say there’s a solution or one right path through all the uncertainty just to acknowledge like if you’re maintaining a lot of plates of anxiety, we see you, we also are spinning those plates and like it’s really difficult that actually the only thing is to wait and see what we need to do with them. You know, there, there isn’t some magic ball that tells us. Oh, actually, this is gonna be the one thing that happens. We just don’t know and that’s not comforting or helpful when we’re trying to be thoughtful in our organizations and anticipate what all of those options might be, you know, OK. Uh uh somber but uh but justified, you know. Um there there is a lot of uncertainty and on the legal side, on the uh economy and fundraising side, uh I mean, you said it, I mean, you know, we, we don’t know but it’s the uncertainty that is uh unsettling. Yeah, we know as a sector we can do hard things. We have faced hard situations, we know that we can do it. The, the real, I think tension in the air for the sector now is that we don’t know what the hard thing is we’re gonna have to do, you know. And so we’re like, you, you’re packing for a trip where you don’t know where you’re gonna go and you’re like, well, do I need a swimsuit? Do I need a hat? Like, I don’t know, I don’t know what resource to put in here because I don’t totally know what’s ahead and I think that’s what makes it really difficult, not that we’re not gonna be able to do it, you know. Yeah, I mean, look at what we have overcome uh September 11th, uh a pandemic. Uh well, before the pandemic was the great recession. And then the next milestone that I can think of is the pandemic. Um And I, I know that we are stronger as a community. If we are United, if we stand up for each other and for the community at large, we, we can overcome whatever uncertainties and challenges are ahead of us when, when we remain united, steadfast you know, all, all for 11, for all that’s uh it, it comes from the three musketeers, but it uh it applies in lots of uh lots of situations and, and this is certainly one of them. Um We’re strong, we’re strong when we’re united. I think community power building is kind of what the my optimistic hope is. Um as we face tough times, um nonprofit leaders and their supporters, um they band together, they, they work through the problems as you mentioned to, we worked through many before. Some of them have been super challenging when we look back generations before us um going through wars and other crises and nonprofits. We’re really like the, the strength and the humanity of the country when they look to the people they served. And hopefully we’re, we’re getting to that again. We’re not making decisions without the community. We’re, we’re making it with the community now. All right. Any other closing thoughts? The last thing I wanted to say because, you know, me, I’m always compelled to have recommendations um for things that people can do. And I too am a human that likes a to do list. Um And I will offer that to others. But yeah, I know we’ve talked about this so many times, Tony, you and I over the years about community committees and you know, ways of building transparency around your technology projects or, you know, having a tech committee that helps you prioritize But to Gene’s point, if you don’t already as an organization have a mechanism, whatever that might be to hear feedback from your community, not like an evaluation for somebody that was in a program or something like that. But I mean, a community committee, a committee of community members that you talk to once a quarter or a town hall event or whatever type of process you might wanna have, this is the time to have it because I think when things are really difficult, we can as staff feel like every single thing that is in the news or every single thing that could be on our community members, minds are on their minds and that they are like judging us for it. But if you have a way to, to really be in conversation with your community directly, you’ll be able to say, ok, the only thing our community wants to know from us is this and we can answer it and we can tell them or hey, our community is really worried about this thing that has nothing to do with us, but they’re really worried about it. So maybe that’s an opportunity for us to partner with an organization that does work on that and show that we’re listening and that we’re part of helping them have access to the resources they care about or whatever it might be, right? Um Because it’s a lot harder to call on a community that doesn’t exist when you’re in need than it is to be in community with people all the time. Um So, you know, if, if there’s anything to put on your January to do list while so much is still uncertain, it’s really to make sure you have some space to be in conversation directly with your community in me. Simple word. They’re at Amy Sample ward.org and at Amy Rs Ward and Jan Takagi, the firm is at Neo Law group.com and he’s at GT and we will convene again. Uh maybe not January, mid February, mid to late February, I think. Uh Well, let’s see what, let’s see what happens in the month of January, but certainly uh latest, you know, February, we will convene and uh and be in community again. Thanks Tony for always making this space. Big hugs Jean. Thank you, Tony right back at you, Amy. Happy New Year. Happy New Year. Happy Holidays. Next week, there’s no show and there’s no show the week after. We’ll be back fresh on January 6th, 2025. Happy New Year. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you find it at Tony martignetti.com. Happy New Year were sponsored by donor box, outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor. Box.org. Happy New Year. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martignetti. The show social media is by Susan Chavez Mark Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. You with us next week. No, you won’t be with us next week. You’re with us in January 2025 for nonprofit radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95% go out and be great. Happy New Year.

Nonprofit Radio for November 18, 2024: Scaling Altruism

Donald SummersScaling Altruism

That’s Donald Summers’ new book, where he introduces the seven phases of nonprofit growth derived from his research and practice. He walks us through assess, align, plan, test, fund, execute, and lead, so your nonprofit scales to meet the demands of your mission and vision. He’s the CEO of Altruist Partners.

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

 

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite abdominal podcast. I’m traveling this week and a couple more weeks. So my sound quality won’t be up to what you’re used to. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us though. I’d suffer the effects of osteochondrosis if you inflamed me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate with usual high quality sound and what’s on the menu this week? Hey, Tony, I hope our listeners are hungry for scaling altruism. That’s Donald Summer’s new book where he introduces the seven phases of nonprofit growth derived from his research and practice. He walks us through, assess align plan, test, fund, execute and lead. So your nonprofit scales to meet the demands of your mission and vision. He’s the CEO of altruist partners on Tony’s take Two Tales from the plane. A savvy survey were sponsored by donor box, outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor box.org here is scaling altruism. It’s a pleasure to Welcome Donald Summers to nonprofit radio. He is the author of the book Scaling Altruism, a proven pathway for accelerating nonprofit growth and impact. He’s the founder and CEO of Altruist partners, an advisory boutique firm with over $1 billion in new revenue and program growth for nonprofits around the world. You’ll find the company at Altruist partners.com and you’ll find Donald on linkedin Donald Summers. Welcome to Nonprofit Radio. So happy to be here, Tony. Uh And the first thing I wanna say is thank you for all the work you do to make the world a better place. It’s always an honor to, to chat with, with leaders like you. Well, thank you. I’m glad that you are with us. Uh You have particular poignance for uh nonprofit radio because we are big, as I said, uh in the introduction, as I always do big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. And you uh make some very clear distinction between the 95% who are listening to nonprofit radio and the other 5% or roughly 35,000 nonprofits that have, that have figured out scaling growth, acceleration, uh efficiencies. So we’re gonna uh I, I don’t want people to leave nonprofit radio, but we’re gonna help people move from being uh their nonprofit being among the 95% to the uh to the wealthier and higher scaled 5%. I think that’s uh that, that I, I think we can achieve that, but I don’t want to lose listeners in the process either. I don’t want listeners to leave nonprofit radio when they go from the 95 to the five, there’s a whole new set of challenges. We can talk about those. But we, we all, we all aspire to better problems. All right. Let’s start with the basics. Why this book Scaling Altruism? What’s the, uh, genesis of it goes back into your practice. There’s research around the, the work we’re gonna talk about. What’s it all about? Well, there’s a tremendous barrier to nonprofit growth and, and as you’ve accurately um pointed out, you know, we’ve got over a million nonprofits stuck below a million dollars a year in the have, it’s a have and have not landscape and they’re struggling to stay afloat. They can’t access the, the, the money and the resources and, you know, Tony, this is a fixable problem and it is so exciting and, and simultaneously frustrating because there’s so much snake oil out there. There’s so many people saying, hey, they’ve got the solutions. Uh but those solutions are often not backed by evidence. So we’ve spent uh 20 years translating the best practices from the high growth, high performing uh nonprofit and the entrepreneurial space, hybridizing everything and putting it in an operating system into which any nonprofit program can fit. And just recently, we’ve, we got the book and we’ve got an accelerator. We’ve got a low cost support program. So I’m just delighted to be here today to talk about uh while it’s still not easy, it’s clear and it’s doable. So any nonprofit founder or executive with courage and grit and tenacity and focus and discipline, which there’s so many out there, if we can just get them away from those subsistence tactics, those survival strategies and get them into the growth strategies with all the tools and the processes and the support we can un unleash a wave of social impact that this country has never seen. And I truly believe that we have the evidence basis. Now, all we have to do is get the word out uh because there isn’t any barrier to, to learning and executing. And, and I’m just again, delighted to share with you today, you lament. Uh And I’m, this is the only time. Uh I think I’ll probably quote the book is that uh the nonprofit sector is decades behind the for profit sector in the rigorous use of organizational growth methodology. And you have this methodology, we’re gonna talk about the seven practices tested, researched uh evidence based, right? So we’re trying to, you’re trying to fill this gap between the for profit and not for profit knowledge basis. And, and it’s problematic to say we want for pro we want nonprofits to run like for profits. And that’s not my message. We want, we want to give nonprofits access to the same tools that everybody else has when you look at MB A programs, you’ve got venture capital markets, you’ve got 350 accelerators you’ve got in incubators, you’ve got mentor programs, the ecosystem for, for profits is incredibly wealthy and it’s incredibly rich and founders can find all these resources. There’s a culture and a practice gap that’s holding back nonprofits. They use different language, different terms, different processes and all it does is create barriers and it makes them hard to understand and, you know, we call it the myth of uniqueness. Yes. Thank you. I was, I was, I’m glad you got there because I was gonna lead you to it if you didn’t. Yes, me. But I’m a, I’m a nonprofit or my, you know, my, our work is hard to quantify. It’s, it’s an after school program, you know, we, we can’t track the Children after they leave or we’re feeding or we’re sheltering. We’re, we, we can’t use business practices because we’re working in, in social, social good. And as, as uh you know, we say whether you think you can or think you can’t, you’re probably right as Eleanor Roosevelt says, um you can measure, I’ve never met, you know, having worked with hundreds and, and touched thousands of nonprofits around the world never run into a program that can’t be rigorously quantified and measured either with, with qualitative or quantitative data. Everything is provable. Everything has an evidentiary basis. So, um it just has to be, you have to be creative. Um, you know, and again, it’s a cultural barrier. So if you have, you don’t, you don’t buy this uniqueness. Uh No, it’s a myth of uniqueness. And I’m, I’m working on getting this article um uh published and it’s propagated by very respected people. Jim Collins who wrote Good To Great, which is this massively successful and, and tectonic piece of literature about what are the best practices driving growth in the for profit space completely uh with great respect to him. But he lost his mind and says these practices don’t apply to the social sector. And he wrote this book uh Good For Great for the social sector. That’s flatly, it’s flat wrong. And he, he’s misguided. Uh He’s well meaning individual. Uh But there’s other people that say, oh, you don’t understand business dynamics because they don’t apply, that’s not the case. And you know, and we don’t say we gotta get out of this distinction between four and nonprofit because it’s a, it’s a false dichotomy. You’re talking about when you need to solve a problem, not just nibble around the edges if you want to accomplish something and you need to put teams of people together and you need to capture the resources and you need to execute with efficiency and effectiveness. There’s a single unitary body of practices and tools that work your corporate, your tax status, your, your corporate tool that doesn’t, that’s just a tool and people get stuck on their tax status and what they, there’s these false labels and they miss the forest for the trees, you know, this in your daily practice. Uh, but, you know, we, we’ve got a, there’s a very small movement and I don’t even like to call them nonprofits. These are social impact organizations for impact, you know, these linguistic frameworks themselves are prisons. So when you free yourself and say, hey, I want to accomplish this. What’s the tool? You know, I just did an interview with Fortune talking about, you know, uh open A is challenges with their fort nonprofit status and, and even the smartest people in the world um often don’t understand what it means to be a nonprofit and what the power is. And the fact that you can have a nonprofit, you can have a for profit, you can have an LC three. You can have a public benefit corporation now. And, and, and again, the revenue in the nonprofit sector is crazy complex. You’ve got individuals, foundations, corporations, government agencies in the US. It’s a $2.5 trillion sector. Half of the money is earned nonprofits earn hundreds of billions of dollars every year, just like any other business. And it’s, it’s gifted, it’s earned, it’s invested, they can take on debt. You can, we have nonprofit clients, we’ve started up for profit subsidiaries. So what you need is good guidance that says, all right, if you have a goal, understand your strategies and then understand your revenue, your execution, your KPIS, the team you need and get out of this nonprofit mindset. Because chances are, uh you know, the social proof. Oh, all these nonprofits are doing galas, everybody’s doing a give big, everybody’s doing end of year appeals. They’re all small and look what’s happened to individual support for the sector. So we’ve got to break out, we’ve got to establish new paradigm and it’s got to be clear, it’s gotta be practical and it’s got to be actionable. It can’t be just this hazy, you know, academic, you know, here’s what to do. We need, how to do it and in what order and, and that’s what we try to do, Tony. Well, you do, you uh a lot of people are trying, you’ve succeeded because the book is enormously actionable. Um And it’s not only look what’s happened to individual giving, look what’s also happened, you know, we at to the scale of the problems that we’ve, some of these that we’ve been working on for generations, not just decades, generations. And we’re still tackling uh poverty, homelessness, uh uh uh uh clean air and water and we’ve been at these things for generations. So we’re not scaling to meet the, the needs. All right. So, so let, let’s get to the, can we get to the, the practice? Let’s start 100%. And I’ll say we have examples where we have scaled solution. It’s, it’s amazing. We just got to get it out. We got to break through the information, overload, break through the noise. So, again, that’s why I’m grateful for this opportunity to try to do just that. Yeah, there are organizations that have scaled. You’re right. Uh, and they’re the, they’re the 5% that they’re the ones, they’re the, uh, future, uh, nonprofit radio former listeners because they’re gonna, they’re gonna, they’re gonna leave here and they’re gonna move into the over a million dollar and they’ll scale to the $50 million and the elite, you know, 1/10 of 1%. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money but also supports you in retaining your donors, a partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location. So you can grow your impact faster. That’s donor box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability your organization needs, helping you help others visit donor box.org to learn more. Now, back to scaling altruism, you’ve got seven phases, phases. The book is all about the seven phases. Why don’t you just step us through, you know, quickly, each one and then we’re gonna come back. Can we do? You don’t look 100%? You look like you have consternation on your face, you. Ok. Ok. Good. All right, you look. All right. So you’re brief, you know, just brief on each of the seven and then we will come back to each of the seven in more detail after 30 years as a fundraiser nonprofit, executive foundation CEO and, and catalyst for the growth of dozens and dozens of, of nonprofits around the world. We, we built this methodology which says do it in order you first need to understand that what the capabilities and assets and skills drive growth and impact many are known, many are not known. So the first part of the book is assessment here are the questions to ask you and your team do. We are do, where do we, where do we line up on a set of benchmarks? Two, you’ve got to align your board and your team around a clear goal, a clear strategy and KPIS so many organizations have these watered down missions and lack a goal because they haven’t had the hard conversations. They let everybody have their own individual version of the truth and they sort of muddle along so that you’ve got before you can write a good plan. You’ve got to nail a couple the tips of the waves and get it done well. And we do that in a one page, what we call a business framework. Thirdly throw out theory of change, grow out your logic models. That is just woo woo I’m tired of that stuff. It doesn’t work you need a goal, you need Kpis, you need a strategy, you need metrics, you need a market analysis. You have to have a clear um compelling uh crisp statement of your value proposition. There’s 15 elements of what comprises what we call a world class investment grade business plan that will allow the organization to have a clear road map for its staff, an actionable guide for governance for its board and a compelling investment prospectus for sophisticated uh wealthy individuals, agencies, corporations and earned income clients. So number three is plan number or you do your best with it and then you test it in the marketplace. You don’t mistake your confidence for actual knowledge. You test and align it with your stakeholders. There’s a process for that. Then we get to funding so many nonprofits are moving ahead with fundraising efforts before they’ve got all the tools in place. And that describes why they’re struggling with growth and trying, you know, surviving on these galas when they’re unable to capture the growth capital. So defining the mix of earned contributed and invested income from those six sources, individuals, foundations, corporations and so forth that strategy, you got to nail the strategy. You have to understand the staffing, how to monitor pay and improve the team. Yep, then, so finance, then you have execution. So all that’s the easy part, then you get to execution, which is hard. How do you actually track? You have to score your strategies and continuously improve them. So we help organizations set up dashboards leading you love, you love your dashboards. Then after all of that, so you’ve got assessment, alignment, planning, funding, right? Execution, right? And then you’ve got lead in the middle. What does it mean to lead? How do you build equitable? Um uh Well, compensated teams. What’s the role of the board? There’s so much information out there. A lot of it’s confusing. It’s very verbose. So you put all these pieces together. It’s a circular process, it builds a flywheel and it’s proven to drive. And this is the one thing I want your listeners to, to, to really focus in on when you apply this tool kit. It typically takes anywhere from 6 to 12 months with a median adoption uh time of about nine months when you apply it. The median annual growth rate of organizations who execute this methodology with fidelity is 25% a year in their revenue and their social impact. These are organizations that were either declining or flat growth. They do the hard work they invest in, in, in adopting and using this operating system. And you know, anywhere from 6 to 12 months afterwards, they get a growth, hockey stick that we have many, many data points. There’s a lot of variants in there. Some organizations take off and get 50 100% growth, others, 5 to 10% growth. But that median of 25% is real. That’s the value of doing this work and it’s not just a pop and drop capital campaign. It’s not a one time win. This is gained growth over time. This is an iterative process which we’re gonna talk through in detail. All right. So let’s go back now to uh number one assessment. The what what grabbed me here is that you’re uh the, the, well, let’s just assure people there’s a lot of detail that we’re not gonna be able to cover you. Just if you want, if you want to scale, if you want to be a former nonprofit radio listener, you gotta get the book because we can’t go through the 50 or so practices in the remaining, you know, 30 or 40 minutes together. So, uh but we will hit the highlights. So assessment number one assess, what I liked to hear was that you, you don’t just say benchmark, but you say benchmark against robust standards. I mean, so you’re already sitting up, you’re already setting the bar high for, for just the, the threshold benchmarking. I like, I like robust standards. You’re competing against the, you know, people. Well, what’s our market rate compared to other nonprofits? Well, guess what? You’re already starting, you know, why don’t you, you have to compete against everybody for top talent, for top people, for top funding. It’s a competitive world. You need benchmarks that are realistic. We’re not trying to, we’re not playing life on easy here, right? You have to understand what it takes to succeed, not survive. And Tony, I want to say this whole process is only for the most ambitious nonprofits. You make the point in the book that it’s, this is not easy, it’s not, you’re not pollyannaish about, about it taking time. I actually, this is, this is not for social impact tourists or people who want to make themselves feel better because they work at a nonprofit. These are people that want to have the courage of their convictions, get their skin in the game and execute and, and there’s a lot of them out there that haven’t been served. All right. So say a little more about assessment before we move on. But uh you have to have top pay, you have to have a, a robust, you have to have KPIS, you have to have board members who have grown companies before the number of nonprofits with nothing but subject matter expertise on their board. You know, we see these um healthcare associations with nothing but doctors on their board. You know, things like that. There’s so many. Uh and again, there’s 50 known drivers and the book allows uh people to walk through and say, do we have these or not? And it’s very factual and clear. So there’s none of this. We, we try to eliminate the ambiguity. And you know, we also give throughout the book, people um can distribute this form, we have the assessment online so people can take it and they can have these conversations that are actually productive and get organizations focused on the right things. So many assessments are, are long, they produce these narratives, nobody can focus on it. So we, we try to keep it short and sweet on the stuff that counts. Number two, let’s move to alignment. You uh you talk about a growth mindset, powerful language, hit these, you know, hit these highlights for, for, for our listeners. Again, you know, I’ve got a, we’re launching a national initiative with, with clients right now. And the core cap, the core capability of organizations that succeed is optimism and courage. And you know, some people, whether through their own past experience or their own trauma, just don’t believe they can succeed, right? And they have a poverty mindset and you know, those are understandable, but if those folks are on your executive team or your board game over, right? And again, choose powerful language. If you want to create confusion with people outside the sector, used words, use or, or even suspicion, use words like charity and gift and logic model and theory of change. Why don’t we all use words that everybody knows like investment, right? Like business plan. So, you know, these are examples, these are uh two practices of many in the alignment sector in the alignment chapter that help give people these traction points. And whether you agree or not. I don’t expect everybody to agree with these and there’s cultural uh and, and historical barriers against using this language in the sector which I acknowledge. Uh again, it’s not for everybody, but for the folks that want to go big, there’s also a set of organizations like you sit down and ask people, hey, imagine Warren Buffett’s gonna write us a check for as big a dollar amount that, that we want all the money we need. How are we gonna spend it? You’ll get folks saying, well, we need a new copy machine. We’ve got to hire an executive assistant and you get other folks saying, well, we want a 500 million endowment. We want offices in every major metropolitan area. And when you do these exercises among people on your board and your staff, you start to understand the enormous practical variance among the, the visions. So it’s exercises like this, you’ve got to do the hard work, you gotta stop and do the work and get people aligned on the big goals and how you measure it and how you’re gonna get there. And you know, these organizations say, well, we don’t have time to do that. Well, you know what? You get to pick your hard, you get to pick your challenge. You want your challenge to be doing the doggy paddle and, and barely staying above water for the rest of your career. Go ahead and do what you’re doing. And until you carve out the time to get these traction points and build a team, uh you’re not gonna succeeded. So, um we don’t make an apology for the investments and the focus that these alignment practices require. And if folks can’t focus and can’t get aligned, they shouldn’t be on your team. Right? So these are hard choices that every organization has to make. But you’ve got to get the building to getting at people on the team. So many board members are supervisory, we’re all, you know, they’re just there to be critics and we all know the problem with the space. But again, clear concise, concrete, comprehensive, very actionable steps for getting your team aligned and agreed on just a one pager breaking through the information overload. And once you have that one pager, then you can get to creating a business plan, which is uh which is the next piece. Yes, we’ll get to three planning. But I wanna uh flesh out uh what’s a b hag bhag this again. I thank Jim Collins, a tremendous scholar in the world of entrepreneurialism. Uh a professor at Stanford uh Management School of Business who studied the stock market. And he, he looked at all the positive outliers and distilled their uh behaviors that drive growth, right? And he settled and he and his research team settled on a set of practices is defined in good to great and great by choice. I’ve learned a ton from those books and be hag having a big hairy audacious goal. You know, you’ve got to have that North Star and you have to have the courage of your convictions and so many organizations aren’t, it’s called audacious for a reason. Right. They don’t want to. And this is what kills me. I don’t care. I like the hairy part. Big, big, hairy. Yeah. It’s, and scaring. They’re not just o, they’re hairy goals. It’s not supposed to be delusional, right? But you’re supposed to stretch yourself if you’re working on behalf of the vulnerable, if you’re working on behalf of those without a voice, if you’re working on behalf of, of creatures or trees, you know, you owe it to your mission to try some, to do something big and so many organizations fundamentally lack the ambition that their mission deserves. Right? And they think that’s because, well, we’ll look bad. Actually, you look worse if you’re behaving safe and you’ve got these wishy washy goals, big dollars follow big visions. So you start with a big vision now, you have to have a credible plan to execute on that vision. But getting that B hag and getting this is what, why we want entrepreneurs on the board. We don’t want risk, averse, you know, people that are worried about taking risks. I mean, yeah, you’ve got to have some of those folks, you’ve got to have a balanced team, but you got to have people that are willing to put it out there for the mission and that’s what a be hag is all about. Not all doctors and lawyers on the board or, or, you know, and you know, and CPA si don’t want to leave out CPA S. They’re, they’re wonderful. You’ve got to have them. You’ve got plenty of entrepreneurial doctor, lawyers and CPA S, it’s more of a personality than a profession. Um And we know what personalities cause that. So when you get into the leadership chapter later, we’ll talk about where that entrepreneurial gene comes from and how to create what we call neuro balanced teams because you can’t have just aggressive entrepreneurs. Otherwise you get out over your skis and things blow up, you need the risk uh managers, you need the administrators and the integrators. So there’s a whole methodology there. But we talk about that later in chapter seven under leadership. All right, you’re the balanced, right? The balanced board of advisors. All right. Uh So the plan number three, the, the, it’s, it’s a business plan, but it’s, but it’s more than just your average business plan. Flush it out, please. Well, you know, you, you Google business plan templates and the variety that comes up is amazing. It all over the road. Small business association. You have nonprofits, the templates that I, that I found early as a practitioner. II, I was a fundraiser um for nonprofit organizations for the early part of my career. And I got uh tons of practice, thousands of meetings with high net worth, sophisticated individuals about passing due diligence, about earning their credibility that we would use their dollars. Well, and having done that all over the world with from everywhere, from modest investors to billionaires and looking at all the templates, we came up with our own that we think is the best because it works. It’s got 15 pieces to it. It’s clear, it’s got lots of examples. So there’s 15 sections to a business plan. It’s all backed up in the literature. It’s a template and we provide nonprofits with not just the template and the explanation of each pieces. There’s a case study in the book, we talk about how we walked uh a wonderful agency for foster Children tree house through the business planning process. We took them from analyzing 22 pages of data per child to under to analyzing only four KPIS. We took them from spray and pray financing to focused targeted strategy. We took them from seven layers of management down to three. You know, the business plan is, you know, really it takes that business framework and builds it out into all the aspects you need to succeed. And here’s the thing. No brochures. I, I had the, the, the great honor of working with Connie Kravis, the Vice President of Advancement for the University of Washington who raised billions of dollars and like many geniuses who I think you say they, they raise $2 million a day on average every day of the calendar year, the UW and major universities raise millions of dollars and, and he asked Connie, hey ho, Connie, how’d you do it? He says, well, I make insiders out of outsiders, right? You establish trust and transparency, no brochures, no videos. None of these tear jerking events. You show them how you’re gonna succeed with a credible concrete, very, very clear plan. These are hard to write, which is why we break it into a bite size chunks, right? Most strategic plans, totally, they’re not strategic and they’re not plans. And this is true, not just in the for profit sector. It’s true anywhere. Very few people understand how to really write an action plan that lines up your staff and will attract investment. We know exactly how to do it. And it’s a very prescriptive process you put your content in but do it the way that this plan says because we know it works. It guides. We iii I published an excerpt in the Stanford Social Innovation Review and I said, look, a good business plan is a Swiss army knife for nonprofit leadership. It’s a guide. It’s a clear roadmap for your staff. It’s a governance guide for your board. It’s a prospectus for investors. It’s, it’s a, it’s a recruiting tool, right? It it captures all your marketing and communication language. It really should be the center, the access of your organization and so many people as you know, produce these plans and sit on shelves, we produce plans that are continuously updated and, and again, the devil’s in the details. Um Not everyone has the focus to really learn all of these uh uh particular steps and really engage in the level of rigor and discipline that’s required to, to achieve a world class business plan. But again, you know, anything hard, how do you eat an elephant one bite at a time? So again, if you’re, you don’t have to be brilliant, you just have to be tenacious. We show people how to bite it off one piece at a time. And guess what? When you’re done with chapter three, you got a completed business plan, it ain’t complete, you got to go to chapter four and test it and refine it so that process can take months, but it will be transformational. It gets you out of the legacy, you know, soft folk, you know, kind of in, you know, not credible, you know, woo woo, you know, strategic plan model, that’s the dominant paradigm and into something far more uh useful and, and able to catalyze organizational performance and growth. And you’re talking about the testing, uh you know, you want us to identify the key constituents who we’re gonna be testing this with and we’re gonna get feedback from, say more, say more there about the, these, you gotta start with your team. So the executive team writes the plan, build it, you know, get the feedback from your staff. These are peers, these are not serfs, they’re not, you know, robots, you’ve got to get alignment among your team. You’ve got to get your board members bought off on the plan. They’ve got to understand what their swim lane is. They stay at the high level. So, testing that plan and revising it just with your team and moving quickly, time is money. You don’t have 69, 12 months, these nonprofit strategic planning processes that take, you know, more if it’s more than, you know, 60 days, it’s broken process. So moving with precision and quickly and creating this alignment, that’s the trick and that’s what we show with these exercises. If you do that alignment piece first, we can produce the business plan quickly. So you do your internal constituents, then you do the next phase. Who are your stakeholders? They could be agency partners, they could be your closest funders. It could be peer NGO S. Um It could be the people obviously needs to be. If you’re serving people, you should review the plan and it’s key elements for the people you’re proposing to serve, right? And make sure you’re getting the the their input, then you can go and test it with prospective partners perspective funders. So there’s a, there’s four or five questions you can ask, you get your board involved. And again, you really practice using the plan and getting feedback. Um, really new. You, you collect new knowledge, you correct, you, you get a lot of practice, you get comfortable uh, with what the plan contains and you get a better document as a result. It’s time for Tony’s take two. Thank you, Kate. We’re back to Tales from the plane. This one isn’t exactly on a plane. Uh, it’s a company that owns a lot of planes, Delta Airlines. I had to change a ticket. I did it over the phone and they gave me a very smart, just s simple one question survey after the call. Ordinarily, I reject the, the customer service surveys. Uh, whether it’s whether I get a link by email or, you know, phone, I just say I, I usually skip them. But I thought, ok, one question they say, you know, will you accept a one question survey at the end of the call? So I said, ok, one question. So, uh, the agent took care of me. She was excellent, made the changes I needed. And the very simple savvy, one question survey at the end of the call, would you hire the last person you just spoke to if you were the CEO of a customer service company? End of quote? And I thought that’s just really brilliant. Like all of a sudden I’ve been elevated. I, I, I’m, I’m, I’m, I’ve got a promotion. I’m not just, uh, you know, uh, I don’t just work at a customer service uh company. I’m the CEO of one and now I’m called on to make a hiring decision and I just thought that was a really, it’s obviously a simple one and I thought it was a smart, uh just survey gets right to the point and just asking about that one person. Really simple. Simple. The last person you spoke to, would you hire them one through five? One? Definitely not. And five. Definitely you would. I pressed a five and that was it. So I wanted to share the simplicity of that survey with you. Maybe it can inspire simplicity for your own surveys. You know, which some of which, right? I don’t mean your surveys are too long, but we all have experienced the customer service surveys that uh you know, they promise it’ll take like 3 to 5 minutes. That OK, that means 15. So um maybe some inspiration for simple savvy surveys by you for you. And that is Tony’s take two. OK. That is so smart. That’s a better way to get feedback. Just something so simple. I think so. Yeah, absolutely. It worked on me one question. Other companies should start doing it. Well, maybe some of our listeners will do it for their nonprofits. Well, we’ve got Buku but loads more time. Here’s the rest of scaling altruism with Donald Summers. What about including these stakeholders, especially the internal ones in the plan development process that happens in phase two that happens in, in phase two, the alignment, it again, but you can’t just write a business plan from scratch. You got to get the, the right alignment. And so you start that in chapter two, gives that one pager that’s got, that’s got executive team and that’s got staff and it’s got board input for and just pieces of it and do it again. You go deeper. So the trick is Tony and it took us many years to figure this out and, and many missteps, how do we create a business plan that people own? That’s not the lowest common denominator. We, you know, you, you’re not gonna, most plans are written so that anybody can believe that they got their piece in there, right? They’re so ambiguous. They don’t mean anything. How do you get something that’s really clear and audacious and courageous and very, very crisp yet everybody’s bought into it. That’s why we spend two chapters on the planning. OK. So it, it all right. Yeah, the, the buy in is included. OK? It’s, I want folks to understand it’s not AAA C Suite developed plan and then you’re bringing it to, then you’re showing it to your staff after, after it’s been brought down from on high, right? It’s not that, no, it’s, it’s got to be inclusive and democratic and at the same time, if there are people like no, I don’t agree. You say goodbye. God bless you and good luck. You’re forming a team here. This is not something where we’re going to have critics and people serving as sea anchors on our sailboat ain’t gonna happen. So also in that planning process, you’ve got to get the right people on the bus and if people don’t believe in your plan and you keep them on your team, what you’re asking for problems and that goes for board members and it goes for staff. So it’s when we talk about alignment and planning, you’ve got to have people that really believe that this can happen and anything short of that will kill your execution. And you know, you have to decide, are we running an organization to keep our, our own people happy and keep everybody in a comfortable space where we’re not going to have any conflict, right? Which is a lot of nonprofits, right? Or are we going to have a team that’s gonna change the world? And we got to get the right people on the bus and we got to make some hard decisions. It’s not a family, it’s a professional sports team. You don’t choose your family, right? You love and you, you, you, you respect whomever is in your family but a sports team. Hey, you don’t have somebody that’s able to pass the ball or doesn’t wanna, you know, adopt your strategy, you cut them. So it’s like what paradigm are you in? You’re not a family high performing organ and this is uh I’m, I’m, I’m quoting from a famous uh uh deck, a Netflix deck that, that set these paradigms many years ago, everything I’ve learned, I’ve, I’ve read somebody else has figured it out. Uh I’m just putting the pieces together. So think of sports teams, not families when it comes to planning. Awesome. Uh I just wanna make sure everybody understands that each chapter has the resources that are talked about in that chapter. So for instance, when you’re, you know, you have, uh when you’re going back to step three, developing the business plan, you have a template business plan at the end of the chapter, it’s all, it’s all on the, it’s all on the website. Oh, it, it, it goes, it goes even deeper than that. Tony, you know, uh nonprofits have spent millions of dollars hiring my firm and we’ve generated many, many multiples of those millions of back. We’ve, we’ve generated over a billion, right? And the whole point of writing this book is to democratize access to these tools. I’ve always been frustrated by books that tell you what to do and not how to do it. So I said, I’m gonna go big on this. I’m gonna say, not just what to do, how to do it. I’m gonna say here are the tools, here are the practices, here’s the exercise, here’s a case study with organizations that went through the same process and we can talk about this later. I, I spent years building an online community that’s now active. It launched in August where nonprofits can join for incredibly low sum of 79 bucks a month and get support from me and my partners and our expert affiliates and from other nonprofits to say, ok, what practice are you on? Here’s what it means. Here’s a tool, here’s a template and you can get feedback from the experts who’ve been to the movie before. So you have all of the depth of resources that you have all at very little cost. Um So there’s no excuse not to do this other than the fact that it requires hard work discipline and focus good old grit. So we go, the book is a portal and every chapter says, hey, go to Altruist accelerator.org and you go to that website and you’ll see a landing page that describes the Accelerator and there’s a sign up and a free trial for the online, for the online accelerator community. It’s based on a platform called Circle. It’s a learning management community and it’s now staffed by about, you’ve got about 15 nonprofits on there now, some really, really cool ones, they’re already showing they can march their way through the practices. Now, many nonprofits, particularly those that are more resourced, are hiring us because, you know, they just don’t have the time and they have the resources and they can bring us in. But for the nonprofits below a million dollars a year, uh this is the fastest and best way uh that, that we’ve been able to see uh to, to adopting this methodology. So it’s a lot more than a book. It’s a, it’s a community and what I really want to do, Tony, if my own bag is to create a movement, right? My friend and, and the chair of the advisory uh of the, of the Accelerators Akhtar Bods Shaw, he’s a brilliant man who is the former head of uh Microsoft Philanthropy. And he’s now a professor of social impact at the University of Washington. And you know, he says something that I’ve taken years to understand. He says, don’t try to scale your organization, try to create a movement, right? Try to create a movement and the movement. I’m trying to catalyze here is empowering social impact leaders with the best tools and practices so they can do their best work. There’s no barriers, they don’t have to struggle and they can, they can share and they can bring these tools and practices to others and we can form communities around this and we, we want to see this, this activate. So hopefully, the, the book is just the, the the entry point. Let’s continue in the book uh with funding which you are careful not to call fundraising you like uh in I MP investment and partnerships. Let’s talk about the funding phase. Oh, gosh, there’s so much to talk about now. All right, let’s start with All right. Yeah, there is. All right. So let’s start with the sources. You, you teased them earlier. Uh you identified six sources, individuals, corporations, et cetera. So let’s, let’s name the, let’s name the six sources that are potential uh for funding before we start that there needs to be a reckoning in the sector. 999 out of 100 small nonprofits identify fundraising as their number one concern and they all know it. But there’s for some reason, it’s like, hey, definition of insanity is, you know, repeating some the same thing and expecting different outcomes. So we’ve got to get out of serial grant writing, begging for money via events, uh uh sending appeal letters, uh you know, tear jerking videos, emotional appeals, uh individual contributions of the sector have plummeted, have plummeted. You know, my uh uh we’ve got a book called The Generosity Crisis. So if you’re a small to mid size nonprofit, you know, we the first thing, whatever you see whenever a small nonprofits that you see zig, you need to zag, you need to do something different. Ok? So the first thing is there’s no pro tips, there’s no quick fix. You need to get your head into a completely different space when it comes to a building a revenue engine and you have to learn the entire funding stack. It’s earned, contributed and invested. It comes from five sources via three means, contributed, earned and invested. There’s a lot to learn here. Five sources uh name the five sourcess, individuals, foundations, government agencies, right? There’s earned income and impact capital investors. There’s debt, corporations and corporations and corporations. So 666 buckets they, and they give, give you money a charitable gift which, which we prefer to call charitable investments or charitable contributions. I don’t like the word gift. It’s got terrible associations, right? Um You have a contribution then you have, right? You earn income, half the money in the sector is earned. These are entrepreneurial businesses who happen to be C threes. They’re getting, they’re, they’re running for profit subsidiaries. They have uh grants and they have contracts, right? They’re, they’re running a typical business, right? And then you have invested income, you can take on debt, you can get peer to peer loans, you can get risk and rate adjusted capital. Um There’s all this money sitting on the sidelines that nonprofits can capture if they have the sophistication and the tools to get it. So, you know, sorting out what a nonprofit should be going for and shouldn’t be going for, requires expertise and experience. We go through the strategies and we go through the high performing and the low performing strategies. If you’re earning money through events, if you’re running a gala or an auction, you might as well commit yourself to a life of poverty and mission, you know, forget, forget scaling your mission. And this is just standard operating procedure. Everybody does it. So everybody thinks they do it. And transitioning organizations away from this is like getting them to quit a heroin addiction. It’s terribly hard. Don’t know any better. You know. You read, I think the reason people don’t know any better is we grew up with the, uh, boy scouts, girl scouts and, and cheerleading squad model of fundraising, which was, which was right. We sell, we sell, I mean, cookies. I mean, I do love, uh, the girl scout cookies. The thin mints especially. And then the Samosas are my number two. But, you know, but in terms of scaling, you know, that’s, that’s, well, that’s right. But that’s, that’s, those are, you know, those are youth activities. That’s a troop level. Yeah. No, that’s fine. If you’re a, if you’re teaching a girl scout how to sell cookies, that’s awesome. But we, but we carry these things, we carry these processes over like the girl, like the cheerleading squad. Uh, you know, Saturday car wash, we carry these into adulthood and then we remember, oh, well, back in the PT A days, we had a bake sale. So why don’t we scale the bake sale and have a gala and, and, and then we end up and, and if you have, if you had spent that the amount of time on the gala, uh uh, instead talking to individual investors about investment level, uh, investment level. Well, I, I do call them gifts but, uh, investment investment level contributions to the, to the contributions to the organization. You, you would have had a lot more, you, you, you end up with a lot more profit and you wouldn’t have the headache over whether the flowers match the bunting and the, the second course came out 12 minutes late. So now, now the, now the chili, the chili course is cold. Yeah. But we, my point is we carry our childhood fundraising activities into adulthood. And then we, we scale that to like galas and auto, you know, car shows instead of instead of building deep relationships. And you do have a lot of strategies and tactics around relationships with individual investors who are gonna partner with you for the long term and give you 567 figure gifts, you know, regularly and the greatest source of money comes from individuals comes from your very, very desperately needed line of expertise, which is planned giving. Yeah, but we got to start in the lifetime giving and those folks become so deeply invested that they want to put you alongside their husband, wife, Children and tell you how many charities I’ve seen nonprofits. They’ve been in business for 40 50 60 years, the millions, the hundreds of millions of dollars they they’re leaving on the table because they’re not cultivating these major investments and these, these these legacy commitments, you know, this, I’m not going to please, you know, refer them to me, refer them because that’s what I keep a 100%. That’s the difference. That’s the difference between a survival tactic, which is immediate gratification money right now for a little transaction. And this is the distinguished, this is, this differentiates the, the the organizations that struggle from the organizations that succeed. Leaders who struggle are oriented towards immediate gratification transactions. Give it to me right now. I gotta have it now. Now, now they’re like Children. They don’t invest in the future. The the adults understand they delay gratification to get a bigger return down the road, right? They in that, that’s what the principle of investment is. They put in focused, intelligent time and effort now for many multiples of return later, right? So you want to be a hunter gatherer running around, grabbing, you know, grabbing hands and your nonprofit will stay small. If you follow you, you’re not able to raise this type of money until you have the business plan and the financial projection and the alignment of your organization that’s critical. The order of operations is essential. You can’t do this high, you know, high value fundraising with tools that don’t pay past due diligence that aren’t comprehensive and and incredibly well written. But once you have those tools, it takes time 69, 12 months, not forever, but you can start capturing six and seven figure investments. If you show how you’re going to allocate that capital to drive your mission. So it’s not again, Tony, I can’t say it enough. This is not for everybody, but I’m telling you, there’s tens of thousands of nonprofit leaders out there that really are ready for this stuff. And, and once they see the light and they get their first six and figure first seven figure investment and I’ve done that so many times in my career, gotten organizations, their first million dollar gift, gotten their organizations, their first multimillion dollar corporate partnership or their first multimillion dollar, you know, plan giving or their first when that happens, then they get it. Let’s move to uh executing you. Love uh executive dashboards. Let’s talk about the, the value we’re on steps. We’re on phase phase six, the, the executing, but talk about the value of solid dashboards. Well, it breaks through the information overload in the clutter. We’re all information overload victims and you know, again, we’re in a paradigm, a space where you wanna do analysis and reporting. Well, we’re gonna, we’re gonna produce a long annual report and we’re gonna look at it once a year that ain’t gonna fly. That dog does not hunt if you want to grow up. If you want to create a high performing high growth organization, you have to have frequent what we call short cycle analysis. On a very small set of key performance indicators. You need to know the outcomes you’re gonna create and the activities that you need to execute on to drive those outcomes. Those are called lagging and leading indicators. And you need to have them at the program level and you need to have them at the organizational level and you need to track them on what’s known as the cadence of accountability. There’s a book written by a brilliant guy and his colleagues called the four disciplines of execution. When I read that it was like the lights coming on, like the heavens opened up and saying, here’s what success looks like for high performing organizations. Once they have their resources and they want to succeed, they might not get it right first, but it’s continuous improvement. And so programs, your finance, your hiring, your governance, your, your, the the scale, the quality, everything that uh an organization needs to measure and communicate both to its staff, its board and its funders and its stakeholders can be wrapped up in a very concise dashboard, takes work to build it. What it does is you think of it is we have a plan instead of sticking that plan on a shelf. Let’s score the plan. Let’s see how we’re performing against the plan. Strategies are meaningless unless they are scored and we collect data and we can’t collect very much data. So many were like treehouse. My famous example of my book was looking at 22 pages of data for each kid. They had all these fancy phd S and all these consultants coming in, bunch of academics going look at all the data, we can analyze everybody was so too much data. You might as well not have not anything at all because you’re drowning in it. You boil it down key performance indicators in the book. They’re very, there’s, there, there are very few of them. They’re not, you can’t subvert them. Everyone knows what they mean. So again, you gotta understand what a KP I is. You gotta understand how to collect the data. You got to nail the workflow, you gotta have good visualizations. Again, a lot of stuff here around creating a dashboard. Um We’ve seen, we’ve tried to help many organizations and they couldn’t get to the dashboarding phase. They didn’t have the focus and the discipline they couldn’t get themselves over the hump of getting out of, you know, uh those organizations, we, we failed to help them. It’s critical, you know, planning is easy, executions, 95% of it. And, you know, until you actually get into starting that we’re going to be really gonna sacrifice what we want to talk about and focus on these core sets of measures when you get there and you do it regularly two weeks for the staff, one month for the board members, quarterly, for your partners and investors have the right cadence of accountability and you have the right KPIS, you’re gonna know real quick if your plan is good or not and you’re gonna know what to adjust and you’re gonna have your strategy, your data is gonna drive your organizational improvement and you do it with fundraising, you do it with programs, you do it with everything and when you get that culture and you get that tool sky is the limit dashboards executing. All right, practice uh practice seven of seven leading leading talk, a little talk some again, more than we can go into here, talk about psychological safety in the workplace. Oh gosh. Hit that. Please explain it very well known again. This is a, this is a, you know, it’s another uh uh the, the, the, the author of the article, I quote, the Harvard business Professor, you got to have an organization where people are, are comfortable telling each other the truth about what they’re thinking, you know, and the nonprofit sector is full of top down uh tyrants just like the for profit sector, right? It’s full of people that are, that are poorly trained, that are insecure, that don’t want to hear bad news again just because you’re a nonprofit doesn’t mean you don’t suffer the same challenges of any other type of organization. It also includes permission to take risks 100%. So psychological safety and this is something that the executive team and the board needs to hold themselves responsible for. And I hear so few organizations talk about it. What risks are we to take? And you know, Jim Collins talks about confronting your brutal reality. What challenges are we really facing and can we talk about them without getting, you know, caught up in this, you know, emotional grip of, oh my God. I don’t want to talk about it. I, I’m anxious. Psychological safety is a fundament of, of if you don’t have that, there’s again, there’s 50 practices in the book. You take out one, forget it, you got to have them all. And psychological safety is a great example of that. Let’s talk about another one, investing in great people money. We we martyrdom should not be part of your compensation strategy. And you know, we talked about the, the great Dan Paata wrote about this in 2006 or seven with uncharitable that we’ve inherited this puritanical impulse to, you know, be unemployed ministers in the space. So we put out job descriptions for our clients with six figure salaries and incentive plans. I just wrote a job description today offering uh um AAA chief ac suite officer of my fast growing nonprofit client equity in their for profit subsidiary. You got to compete with the best brains right there. There’s no, there’s no sacrificing. So um and, and oh my God, what if we pay our people? You know, the highest paid nonprofit staff in, in every state are Tony. This is I do because you have it in the book. But go ahead if the f football coaches, football coach, nobody complains about paying football coaches. 2030 40 some guy down in Texas got like A 70. These are nonprofit guys. Now, the IRS doesn’t want, you know, excess, you know, compensation. There is a ceiling, right? And you’ve, you’ve got, but, but there are procedures around, there are procedures. Again, it’s a mindset thing. People get the right people on the bus. There’s ways to structure it. You know, you can have incentive pay for fundraisers that are still in, in line with the A FP ethical guidelines. Again, there’s a lot, there’s lots of specifics and nonprofit executives need to understand all of them. There is a lot in the leadership chapter uh uh for that practice, the uh you open the, well, you in each chapter with a quote and that the one to that chapter is we manage things we lead people. Oh, you know, I have a, another uh uh uh uh uh great thinker, you know, there’s a, there’s a small set of books that have helped me, you know, deliver catalyze growth to our, our many clients and, you know, another, you know, um I shock a de uh the, the great um and, you know, thinker, it, it uh uh understands, you know, one of the founders of Bank of America pointed me out to him, one of the, one of the old time executives, he’s been long past and he said you need to read this book to if you’re going to be a management consultant and he shows how people are either pro some combination of producers, um, entrepreneurs, administrators or um integrators and it was a light grow going off, you know, so many empathetic people from nonprofits get together and if they’re all integrators, they’re, they, they’re all worrying about how each other is feeling and nothing ever gets done. If they’re all entrepreneurs, there’s nothing but arsonists, then there’s fires getting put out. So, and, and there’s nothing but drivers, they can end up being lone wolves, flush this out in, in, in regard to something you said earlier. Uh the board, you the, the balance, you know, the, the balance on the board and then we’ll, we’ll, we’ll wrap up again. So again, I don’t write about everything that nonprofit leaders need to know about leadership. There’s a lot of resources out there and I’m, I’m pointing out these are the tools that you must pay attention to. If you do. If you’re ignorant of these tools, you risk um organizational, you know, constant struggle. So it’s not trying to be everything that’s ever been written about governance. There’s a lot of books and there’s, there’s more information that you need. No, no, but I want, I want you to hit, I Donald, I want you to hit on uh flesh out uh the balanced board, you know, getting, getting that, that getting that personality as well as skills and right. So everyone knows you’ve got to have diverse skills. I hope everyone knows you need, you need people that know technology that no law that no finance that no operations, that hr advertising. So you want to get diverse skills, right? Obviously, you want diverse backgrounds, ethnicities, gender and so forth. But the other thing that people don’t talk about is diverse thinking styles. You need people who are entrepreneurial, who are risk takers. You need um risk mitigators, right? And you need people that are uh do this the structuring piece and the same holds for boards and executive teams. So again, we give a, a very shorthand uh uh introduction to the concepts. And again, there’s tools and there’s, there’s a whole set on the accelerator website on how to identify folks and help them talk across their differences. So many organizations are in conflict because people don’t recognize is that someone else has a different neurological style that they’re born with and I don’t know how to talk to them. Now, you probably wouldn’t be surprised to understand that I’m a driver and an entrepreneur and I’m terrible with details and I’m not much of an integrator. I’m the guy who’s driving out head making stuff. I’m a founder, my team, my firm will struggle if I don’t have strong administrators and strong integrators and it has, I’ve made this mistake myself. So, and I’m going to naturally uh cause the hairs to go up on the back of the neck of an integrator because I’m outspoken and I’m ambitious and executive and I’m not worried about their feelings and that integrator needs to know that they’re not gonna succeed without me in the organization. And I need to know that I’m not gonna succeed without them. And we better understand each other. And that is, and it took me years to learn this lesson and it’s just one of seven practices in the leadership piece that it’s hopefully it’ll, it’ll turn the lights on for leaders so they can create what we call neuro balanced teams, not just on the board but on their staff c street also. And staff and below. All right, the book is scaling altruism, a proven pathway for accelerating nonprofit growth and impact. Where do folks go if they want to join the Accelerator program online, which the book is integrated into where, where just where do we go? You go to scaling altru, excuse me. Uh Let me start over Altruist accelerator.org has a landing page and a link to the platform where you can altruist accelerator.org read the book before you start the Accelerator, right? You got to read the book and then the Accelerator goes through and reviews each practice. There’s short videos and a full library of tools and you’ll find people like you in different nonprofits that are working their way through the tools and there’s no barrier to entry, there’s no application and you expect to spend an hour or two a week. That’s all it’s needed. Low dose, high frequency. It’s like getting a gym membership, you, you’re gonna get out of it, what you put into it. And I’m there along with my colleagues, my affiliates and our partners to answer questions and guide people. So no cost, all you have to do is have the ambition to join. And if it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. Right. It’s month to month and it’s 79 bucks. It’s about the price of a cell phone. Altruist accelerator.org. All right. That’s it, Donald. Thank you very much for sharing all this. Thank you. Thank you for all the work that you’re doing to help me share and for all the help you’re already delivering to nonprofits and helping them capture um plan giving, which is so critical. It’s such a big piece of this next week. Another author David Rode with his new book, passion isn’t enough. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you find it at Tony martignetti.com were sponsored by donor box, outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor. Box.org. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martinetti. The show social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation. Scotty be with us next week for nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95% go out and be great.

Nonprofit Radio for November 11, 2024: Accepting Cryptocurrency Gifts

Pat DuffyAccepting Cryptocurrency Gifts

Code. Blockchain. Proofs. Wallets. Exchanges. Coins. If foreign words like these keep you from accepting a gift that tens of millions of Gen Z and Millennials invest in and gift, Pat Duffy will set your mind at ease. He defines the terms in plain language and explains why crypto giving belongs on your donation page. He’s co-founder of The Giving Block.

 

Listen to the podcast

Get Nonprofit Radio insider alerts

 

I love our sponsor!

Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.

Apple Podcast button

 

 

 

We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners

Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.

Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.
View Full Transcript

And welcome to Tony Martignetti nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I am your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite abdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d be forced to endure the pain of kyphosis. If you twisted me around the idea that you missed this week’s show, here’s our associate producer, Kate to introduce it. Hey, Tony, here’s what’s up accepting Cryptocurrency gifts, code, Blockchain, proofs, wallets, exchanges, coins. If foreign words like these keep you from accepting a gift that tens of millions of gen Z and millennials invest in and gift. Pat Duffy will set your mind at ease. He defines the terms in plain language and explains why crypto giving belongs on your donation page. He’s co founder of the giving block on Tony’s Steak too. We have a new president were sponsored by donor box, outdated donation forms blocking your supporters, generosity, donor box, fast, flexible and friendly fundraising forums for your nonprofit donor box.org here is accepting Cryptocurrency gifts. It’s a pleasure to welcome Pat Duffy to nonprofit radio. Pat co-founded the giving block, creating the new fundraising category, crypto philanthropy. The giving block helps thousands of nonprofits, fundraise cryptocurrencies, stocks and donor advised fund grants. He was a Forbes 30 under 30 in social impact in 2022. You’ll find the company at the Giving block.com and you’ll find Pat Duffy on linkedin. Pat. Welcome to nonprofit radio. Yeah. Thanks so much for having me. It’s a pleasure. I’m glad you’re with us. Uh, ok, let’s start with basics le let’s make sure everybody understands the, just the essentials, the basics of what Cryptocurrency is before we start talking about how your nonprofit can benefit from it. Yeah, definitely people overcomplicate it a lot. So in very simple terms, it’s a digital form of asset. It’s kind of like money in the sense that you can move it anywhere in the world really quickly. You can sit in an account. Um, it’s fungible divisible. Um But it kind of plays the role of a stock um or of gold kind of stores, the value in the sense that a lot of these cryptocurrencies have a set, um number of units that can’t be increased. The code is written that way. So there’s a scarcity element where you can buy into something and know that it won’t be um manufactured and won’t be creative of it. Uh And then it’s kind of like stocks and that a lot of these cryptocurrencies have speculative values where people are kind of betting on whether or not they’ll go up or down. Um But all of them for the most part are built off of Blockchain. And that is just uh kind of computer riddles, cryptographic uh proofs that are solving uh problems. And when they all um agree on the solution to that proof, a transaction is authorized and money moves so really secure way to store value, to move value. Um super cost efficient, just kind of a really effective version of digital money. Ok. Now it has been with us for years in, in, in the mainstream uh are fairly mainstream. There’s probably argument about that but it would be generous, you know, say mainstream at least or at least fairly mainstream. OK? But when you uh when you start to say, all right, so it’s, it’s sort of like you mentioned gold but then there’s code and you talk about scarcity and some people for some people, it’s speculative and it’s on the Blockchain and you talk about proofs, this is the stuff, this is the stuff that I think makes people like what the what are we talking about here? So, so, all right, that is an overview but we gotta, we gotta drill down what you know, like code and scarcity and speculative and Blockchain proofs uh reassure our listeners that this is something that is safe. Uh you mentioned safe, but you got to explain why the Blockchain and the proofs make it safe. Like why? OK, why is this something that we should just think about before we even start about how to get into it. We’re not there yet. Why should we consider bringing this to our board? Uh you know, with scarcity and speculative and Blockchain and proofs? Yeah, definitely. So every technology that you’re interfacing with sounds like this if you dig into it. So it’s just at a super high level. If you think about Bluetooth and Wi Fi, I even say like if you’re going to buy a car, like most people aren’t really in tune with the fact that like pistons are firing and like, what is the transmission? Like there’s all these things, it would sound infinitely more complicated than it needs to with every technology. Eventually you get to a place of like, why should I care? Do I need to use it? Has it been made easy for me? Um Those sorts of questions when it comes to crypto are important, we’ll get into those to answer the question first about like the complexity of it, like the Blockchain and the proofs and everything else. Like why do we even need something like this? We had money, we have gold, we have stocks. Like what’s the point? Um When you are sending money from one place to another, there’s no real system for it. Like ultimately what’s kind of happening is people are updating numbers and spreadsheets and there are automated processes for it. But like there’s no formalized system that’s authorizing that like there are lawyers authorizing whether or not an agreement is actually legitimate, right? Or that both parties have agreed to it. There are banks authorizing whether or not funds are in one place or another, right? There are people who are initiating transactions and kind of choosing where to park their money. Um When you think about stores of value, you can’t really store value with something like cash. Um you have to have something like gold and gold isn’t fungible, right? You can’t take a piece of gold and divide it and send it on the internet real quick. What do you think about something like stocks? You’re speculating on these assets that are tied to a company but doesn’t really function like money. You can’t move stocks between individual will or try to like stake your stock somewhere and earn interest very conveniently because it’s not technologically driven. There’s a lot of inefficiency in all these different types of money and stocks and gold. So what these cryptographers were trying to figure out is like, can we create a more um useful financial instrument? And in doing so, could we make it so that it’s infinitely more scalable than something like dollars in terms of where the dollars come from? In terms of how difficult it is to move money to one place versus another. Like ultimately, the money isn’t actually moving. We have something called fractional reserve banking where a bank is kind of pretending there’s more money in the bank than there is when you wire money to a bank, they’re not actually getting a bag of cash from somewhere else to kind of back it. Um So what you have with Cryptocurrency in short is you write this code and the code is formalized and it can’t be changed and it says it’s gonna do a few things. We’ll take Bitcoin as an example. So with Bitcoin, they go, there’s only ever gonna be this many Bitcoin and we write the code in a way where it can’t ever be altered. So people will know for sure in the way that when you have dollars sitting in the bank, the Federal Reserve during COVID, for instance, could print a bunch of money devaluing your uh savings. That can’t happen with Bitcoin if people go. But that’s great. There’s a 0% chance that more supply will be injected, but I can still have this asset. It’s easy to move around. Ok? I like that. And then people go, well, if I wanna send it to somebody else, how do I know it’s gonna get there? Right. Or if I have it, how can I prove that? I actually have it and someone can’t just take it away or say it isn’t sitting in my account. Um The code is again written with the cryptography where you would have to get more than half of the computers involved in Bitcoin to all simultaneously agree on the false premise that it isn’t your Bitcoin or the false premise that you send it somewhere else? You’d have to orchestrate what is an impossible level of scale and it packing all of these devices at once, maybe the most secure way and the most provable way to say, I actually have a thing or it’s actually gone where I said, I’d like it to. So you go, ok. So I have a more guaranteed way of saying I own something and a more guaranteed way of saying I’ve moved it somewhere else and people say I like that too and then there’s an efficiency component. So because it’s all code based, you don’t need banks to code is what authorized the transactions. You don’t need banks to prove that you have the asset or to say I moved it to someone else. It’s so much more cost effective and um you don’t have to spend as much money moving it from one place to the other. So you go, oh I could move a billion dollars instantaneously, you know, within a matter of seconds at the lowest cost possible without all these middle men and infrastructural components. So you’re writing code more or less to replace what are a bunch of inefficiencies in the asset types from like cash to stock gold and then the institutions necessary to move those asset types or prove that they’re in a particular position or pretend that they’re in a particular position with a lot of finance So it’s just a really efficient alternate financial system that solves for a lot of problems that cash had, the stocks had that gold had. So people are betting on it when people hold something like Bitcoin, they’re kind of betting on it as if you had a share of stock. Like cell phones are gonna be used more often because they’re so much more convenient than a landline. People are holding Bitcoin oftentimes as a correlated asset saying, I think this cryptography in finance, this uh cryptographic proof of work system. These blockchains, I think these tools are gonna be used more and that companies are gonna use uh these crypto assets to make their systems more efficient. Uh So that’s explaining the technology. Second half of your question was why should nonprofits take it seriously? Well, ok. All right. Before we get there, we, we will, we will, we gotta, we gotta tick off a few things. Um You, well, first of all, let’s reassure people, you said you’re writing code, but let’s just reassure people they’re not writing code, you’re not, you’re not profit is not writing the, the code is written in, in such a well, the code is already written for cryptocurrencies, right? I just wanna make that like when you’re on Google, when you’re using your iphone, when you’re using your tax software, the code is serving a particular purpose. Definitely, you’re just clicking buttons. There’s just making sure that somebody doesn’t say, well, wait, I have to write code. No. OK. If there was a listener who didn’t quite understand. OK. Um You, you said it’s uh now you said it’s scalable, but then you also said there’s a, there’s a finite amount. Those, those two, those two sound incongruous to me. So what am I not? What am I not getting about your explanation? No, great question. So, scalability in terms of the infrastructure, like how much money you can move over a particular period of time or how effectively it can solve different problems. And like if 100,000 people send the transaction or one person sends a transaction, it doesn’t become more difficult, right? You can fit more of these transactions into one block and have them approved. It actually becomes more energy efficient. The more transactions that happen in the sense that if you’re doing one transaction, you’re cracking all these codes to solve it, it kind of takes a lot of energy. This is one of the complaints of something like Bitcoin, but the more people who end up using the technology is actually uh authorizing more transactions at less cost. So it’s scalable in the sense that it allows for, if you wanted to scale the traditional financial ecosystem, you would need skyscrapers, you would need human employees, you would need a bunch of cars, taking them to buildings, you would need more lawyers, more agreements. Um When you do that off of a code base you can make an infinitely larger financial system to offer infinitely more transactions um at infinitely lower cost and more uh effectiveness. So, not scalable in the sense that you create more of the assets themselves. Um but scalable in the sense that more people can participate in that network at lower cost. Ok. Lower cost, greater efficiency, right. So, I mean, comparing it to uh you know, checks, you know, there’s a lot of, if there’s a heavy mail volume in the week, let’s say it’s the final week of December and is a heavy mail volume. You have to wait longer for your check to get to the nonprofit. You have to wait longer during certain periods for your broker to make a stock transfer for you. Even if it’s, to me, it’s just, it seems like it’s only a couple of keystrokes. But sometimes you say, well, it takes up to 3 to 3 business days to, well, it’s like you, you, you, you’re typing a couple of keys. What, what is the three business days? But anyway, uh but brokers, brokers can be all right, broke. All right. So, and to your point, you know, you made the same point. You’d have to build, build a bigger buildings and have more bank employees to scale, you know, billions of transactions or something. All right, I see. I understand. Thank you. Explain the scale up. Um Another one, you talk about, uh you know, security, you’d have to convince more than half of the servers that are, that are part of the chain that you own, the asset that you’re claiming that you own or you’re owning the, uh, we’re not talking about dozens. Reassure people. How many, what’s the scale of the server, the servers that are involved in? You know, let’s just stick with Bitcoin. That was your example for the, for the currency so far. Oh, yeah, I’d have to look up the number but I mean, there’s millions. It could be tens, hundreds. I, I’d have to look at what it is. Um, but in short, when you, when I say I’m gonna send Tony, you know, $100 in Bitcoin, what it does is it wraps it in a cryptographic riddle more or less that these miners. When you hear about like Bitcoin mining, you have all these computers that are waiting to crack riddles. These are riddles that like humans can’t solve it. A computer needs to figure it out and the faster they solve it and by getting it correct, they get a little reward that’s like released on the network. So they, they get a little bit of money off that. So they’re all university incentivized to solve it correctly. You would have to hack into all of these individual computers and get them to simultaneously, uh, agree that an incorrect proof is actually a correct proof that says instead of your wallet is the endpoint someone else’s wallet is the end point, which was impossible. More or less when there were even like 50 of these computers doing it. You’d have to orchestrate and crack into everyone’s system which all has their own security protocols. Um, it just becomes infinitely more impossible over time. So at a bank you can log into one bank uh computer and you can change the records on the spreadsheet or you could push money out of an account to another person. You’d actually have to convince, um, you know, millions of these super computers more or less that the money isn’t actually an Tony’s accounts in someone else’s. And then the same thing is true for changing a transaction record, which is why law enforcement um prefers crypto transactions to cash. Why they think it’s so much more traceable and safe. Um If you’re a criminal who’s moved Bitcoin, let’s say, from one wallet to another, you could never change the record or cook the books like it has moved from a wallet to another wallet. You would need that same level of computer takeover to just pretend you didn’t move money or you took it somewhere. So at an individual level, it allows for its privacy if I send it to you and we’re not being investigated by the FBI. If you’re a company, I could transfer funds without having to go through all the protocols. But if law enforcement were to try to investigate, did you do something you weren’t supposed to do. There’s no way for me to pretend I didn’t commit a crime or move money to that other person. It’s permanently locked in and traceable. All right. Reassuring. It’s time for a break. Imagine a fundraising partner that not only helps you raise more money but also supports you in retaining your donors. A partner that helps you raise funds both online and on location. So you can grow your impact faster. That’s Donor box, a comprehensive suite of tools, services and resources that gives fundraisers. Just like you a custom solution to tackle your unique challenges, helping you achieve the growth and sustainability, your organization needs, helping you help others visit donor box.org to learn more. Now back to accepting Cryptocurrency gifts. All right. So let’s let’s move to um the value, you know, why, why should, why should nonprofits pay attention to this? I mean, I let’s talk a little about like giving trends a bit to, I’m sure this skews by age younger, I I happen to be a baby boomer, young, young, very young, very very young, baby boomer, very young baby, boomer uh mathematic. No, but mathematical proof by, by, by birth year. Uh I, I’m very young baby boomer. Um in case I hadn’t mentioned that I am young baby, but you know, I’m sure there are not many boomers uh giving crypto donation. So let’s talk a little about the giving trends but, but also just, you know, generally why, look, why bother. We’ve been doing this fine with checks, stocks, wire transfers. Why, why should we bother? Oh, it’s a great question. So, if, if the methods of payment you accept as a charity were driven by the nonprofit trying to solve a payments problem, you wouldn’t really have to adapt at all. Right. The nonprofit gets cash through a check the same way they would from a credit card. But you take credit cards as a nonprofit because eventually there are so many people using them and they’re so much more convenient to the ability to get that donor and convert that donor and have them pay in a way where they’ll actually send you the money. Once credit cards become their thing, you eventually have to just adjust to it. Right. The same reason nonprofits take stocks, you don’t take stocks because it’s easier than a credit card. You take stocks because it’s so much more tax efficient for a US donor. If they’re gonna send this appreciated stock to the charity and it’s a million bucks or they send a million in their bank account, they might be erasing an extra 150 grand in capital gains tax liability because the donor doesn’t pay capital gains tax on the donate stuff and neither doesn’t charity. So the example I use is like, think about credit cards, merged with stocks. Credit cards are used because people move money using credit cards and actually there’s so many people doing that, that if you don’t have that option on your site, a lot of people come there to look for it. You ask for bank details or a check instead and they just drop off. They go, this isn’t the way I like to move money. Um And there is a conversion issue with that and then people take stocks again because if you’re gonna get a big donation, 5 to $15,000 average gift size, plenty of them, a lot higher than that. Donors who get into those types of gift sizes. They’re thinking about the numbers, they’re thinking about the math. And if I can give 100 grand to one charity and save $20,000 more, I’m gonna consider that nonprofit. Um, a lot more often than a charity I can always send the cash to. So there’s a sort of a supply side push. That’s right. You can say the donors, there are donors, the supply side of the charities being on the demand side. There’s a, there’s a, there’s a push among don’t when checks became popular, when stocks became popular, when credit cards became popular. Absolutely. Right. Ok. That’s right. So there’s, there’s tens of millions of people in the US who use Cryptocurrency and there’s about 600 million worldwide. So it’s, it’s at a size and scale in terms of the user count and people participating in these systems that it’s not, you can’t not have it as an option at a certain point. So like there’s more users on Coinbase than there are on fidelity or Charles Schwab at this. Like it’s, it’s at a scale that most people who don’t participate in. It aren’t really aware of. Like Gen Zs are more likely to trade crypto than trade stocks, like more likely. And then millennials, 90% of millennial millionaires are crypto traders. Like it’s if you are a millennial or gen Z, that cares seriously about investing in any capacity, it’s a part of your world. It’s part of your portfolio and it’s part of the way you think about money. So when it comes to giving, it’s the same thing. So there’s that element of just the widespread uptake and then there’s the element of it’s so tax efficient. So when something appreciates again, you don’t pay capital against tax on it. So if I have a million dollars in Bitcoin, that’s gone up a lot. And I have a million dollars sitting in the bank, I can move the million dollars in Bitcoin to the charity if I want to make that kind of a donation. And let’s say the 150,000, 200,000 that I owed in state and federal capital gains tax on the appreciation of that investment that evaporates the charity gets the full million. I give them the full million to get the full million dollar write off. And that $200,000 tax burden disappears. And then I, as the donor can even take the million I had in the bank and buy more Bitcoin or whatever crypto I’m donating and now I have a million dollars of Bitcoins if I gave the cash. But it’s at today’s cost basis. I don’t know any taxes on it yet. So it’s this magical tax liability eraser that people have always dealt with stocks, especially older donors, younger donors never really did it because it’s inconvenient. We need to work with the broker. But with crypto, you can send the transfer as easily as you said it with a credit card with this enormous additional tax benefit. And the more of these younger donors who keep their cash in crypto to interest and then move out of those stable cryptocurrencies into investments like Bitcoin, the more of their money that’s parked there, the more convenient it is for them to send it that way, the more tax efficient it is because crypto has outperformed all the other asset classes for the last 10 years. All of those things compound to the point where if you want younger donors in particular young donors to consider that major gift pathway. So you can kind of future proof that donor base for the great wealth transfer and beyond, they’re becoming this larger and larger swap of what that world looks like. Now, what about the charitable uh federal income tax uh deduction? Is there, is there that for a Bitcoin gift. Is there a charitable deduction? Yep. You get the same deductions if you gave anything else, you the tax liability and it’s really convenient. Ok. So you avoid the capital gains and there is a charitable deduction which would be at your, whatever your marginal tax rate is. Ok. And that’s been locked in by the IRS year after year over and over. It’s not going anywhere. Ok. Just making it, making sure the basics are covered. Ok. OK. What more, what more do you want to say uh about uh value, importance, relevance, anything? II, I didn’t wanna, I didn’t wanna end your, your explanation. I just wanted to make uh I wanted to make sure people understand the basics. No, that was it. I was out of important things to say, I guess. Uh the only other thing I would say is um for nonprofits to understand the uptake. So like the majority of the Forbes top 100 nonprofits in the US already have crypto fundraising programs. So it’s, it’s more common than not the bigger and more established. The nonprofit is, it’s becoming pretty much universal for small and mid size nonprofits. Um It’s less common in the same way that they tend to lag on other technology adoption, but it’s, it’s not like a fringe thing from the charity side either. Right. Billions of dollars have been donated. Um Nonprofits actively present this to donors in particular younger donors and it generates revenue, increased average gift size. Like it’s, it’s pretty well adopted over the last 67 years. All right. How do we reassure folks about the headlines that they see, you know, a Bitcoin dropped from? Yeah, I don’t, I don’t really know what the numbers are. I know, like at the low end it went down to $30,000 but it had been as high as, I don’t remember how much, you know, per per coin. How do we reassure folks who read headlines about crypto, Bitcoin? Well, they’re not synonymous. Bitcoin is a, is a, is a coin, one of many cryptocurrencies, but people read headlines about Bitcoin the floor dropping out. How do we reassure people about that? That’s a great question. So there’s um in short, there are several considerations that matter a lot for folks involved in crypto that don’t matter for nonprofits depending on how you’re using it. So, one of the big misconceptions charities think about with crypto is that they have to hold crypto to accept it. So like one of the first things we built into our tool is it immediately liquidates any balances instantaneously. So it’s just a program that scans you have a crypto exchange account on a heavily regulated crypto exchange platform tied to your institutions. Ein it sits there and as soon as crypto hits any wallet in that account, it says automatically sell for the US dollar going rate value instantaneously. So from a volatility standpoint, as an investor or as a nonprofit who wants to add crypto, let’s say to your endowment. Um and invest in it long term price volatility is a concern for sure if you’re investing and you’re not interested in things that are that volatile. Um Or you worry about the, the risk of losing value on the funds that you’re holding and the idea of holding crypto or investing in it as a, a donor or a nonprofit isn’t for you. But for 99% of nonprofits, they use that auto liquidation feature. Even the nonprofits who hold it for the most part liquidate the crypto that comes in and they’ll invest in more stable cryptocurrencies like a Bitcoin Ethereum. They’ll make sure that if there’s some of these smaller all cryptocurrencies that are extra volatile, they don’t hold those things. So as a nonprofit, you can accept the fact that let’s just say us, for example, that there’s 60 ish million people trading this stuff, they have decided to participate in the system. Despite the volatility, this is how they’d like to invest and potentially give to us when it’s up. We’ll probably get more when it’s down. We’ll probably get a little bit less. But ultimately, that volatility is not something we have to endure because it hits our account and it automatically liquidates. So the price volatility thing is optional for charities, whereas it’s not optional for investors. Ok. Right. You’re making a distinction between accepting it and investing in it. Uh, and there’s also price volatility in the stock market. Absolutely. And that’s why stocks, stocks are quickly liquidated. It’s so, it’s, it’s identical. Nonprofits don’t hold stocks that are, that are donated. They, uh, they liquidate that day usually and, and then they can decide to invest or, or spend, you know, what, whatever and if they’re gonna invest in stock it, it’s, it’s obviously a decision that they make independent of the, the, the stock that was donated. That’s right. And it’s probably for the best because there are a lot of, a lot of our nonprofits, like, around this time, like Bitcoin almost hit a new all time high yesterday. Like, cryptocurrencies has been doing really, really well. It’s up like 100 and 50% over the last year. It’s, it’s like, tripled since the bottom of the last Bear market. Um, a lot of nonprofits. I mean, dozens in the last couple weeks have been, like, turn off the auto conversion and I’m like, let’s have a meeting and let’s talk about it. It’s just bad. It’s just natural. You see a thing go up for 12 months and you’re like, it’s gonna keep going up forever. I feel like an idiot. I’m not a sucker like I know. And it’s like, well, let’s just, let’s say let’s not time the crypto market anymore than we’re gonna try to time the, uh, the New York Stock Exchange or you know, or the S and P, we’re not, we’re not gonna be able to, let’s not time these things. Let’s not get carried away either. All right. So now that not only that, not only accepting it, but let’s keep it, let’s hold it. So, so our general, we cannot give financial advice back. We can’t tell anyone not to do. But like, usually after a conversation it’s very rare that any of our nonprofits ever don’t have auto conversion on. And some people get annoyed about that because we’ve been doing this for seven years. So the nonprofits who haven’t had auto conversion on have actually made uh an extraordinary amount of money. If they actually held it through, they didn’t pan excel at different points. It’s gone up a lot over the last seven years, of course. Um But there’s a lot of volatility. So like we said, ever, it’s just like you could turn it on today or turn it off tomorrow and easily lose money. Like there’s a lot of risk in investing and a lot of no in particular, let’s just say if you don’t have an endowment making, the only asset you’re deciding to hold and invest in Cryptocurrency is I don’t think reasonable. And even if you have an endowment, it should be a very small percentage if you’re even considering it just because of like you’re saying, there’s some volatility there, you mentioned different kinds of coins. Uh Let, let’s do we, we’ve used Bitcoin as an example. You mentioned a couple of others. What do, how, how does all that? And there are many right, there’s, there’s hundreds, hundreds, aren’t there maybe thousands? Thousands? All right, thousands of different coins. How does that play into uh what we accept? Uh do we need to accept certain coins? Only ex explain that the basics there? Yeah. So there are some cryptocurrencies that solved really important problems just from a technological standpoint that made it really easy to write codes called smart contracts that like automate processes and allow people to build these kind of applications that tie into the networks. And then there are some cryptocurrencies that are, it’s like open source code related to some other crypto and you make kind of a copy and paste version of it. Like you hear about these meme coins where it’s just kind of um you’ll see a Cryptocurrency and it’s got like a picture of a dog and there’s like $30 billion invested in it. And that’s sort of like baseball cards or certain types of art where it’s like people are investing in it because they’re trying to catch a wave and there’s like momentum and timing and it’s not really doing anything that’s fundamentally changing anyone’s life. It’s just like people want it because other people want it and those tend to muddy the water in terms of people understanding the value because they’re like, oh all cryptos kind of feel like this. But in short, um there’s probably uh you know, a few 100 that are doing unique technological things and those tend to be the top Cryptocurrency. So even if you get down into the top 2030 5080 these are very high market cap um assets, like more than most other types of investments. Like I think on the stock market with the Bitcoin ETF S for instance, like I think the Bitcoin ETF S have well surpassed silver. Like there’s a lot of interest in some of these technologies. But if you made an ETF O one of these like Doge coins, um you probably wouldn’t necessarily see the same level of interest. Um What a nonprofit needs to understand is similar to what we said about the auto conversion. This doesn’t need to be a consideration of yours because again, you’re not investing in these cryptocurrencies or choosing which ones to invest in. You just wanna make sure that whatever is being sent to you isn’t like a scam or something that like the SEC or some other regulatory agency would consider. Um not OK, or maybe classify as a unregistered security. And then you want to make sure that there’s enough liquidity on the order books to accept this and not get caught, hold in the bag you don’t want because we’ve heard these horror stories of very small cap crypto gets donated to charity. It’s $100 million type donation and then they try to move it to an exchange and sell it and they lose 80% of the value because again, the volatility. So that is solved for by using an exchange on the back end instead of just a wallet. So these exchange accounts that we use through Gemini, it’s just like Coinbase, it’s like fidelity. It’s like e trade. It’s a uh exchange with a ton of order book liquidity. Um millions of users people trading into and out of assets and the uh assets that get listed on that exchange. These cryptocurrencies are ones that, that exchange and their legal team in uh relationship to all of these regulators that they interface with have decided are OK to list and have enough interest in market activity um where they can easily liquidate, um buy and sell orders. So when you’re taking crypto through the giving block, it’s only the assets that GM and I the most regulated Cryptocurrency exchange in the US has listed. And then if a donor came to you trying to send you something else, we have something called private donor services where we have a, a lawyer on our team and we can talk to the exchange and other partners to decide like is this a legitimate asset to accept from that donor? But those cases are very rare. So you should almost never. And for pretty much every nonprofit work with the answer is never um be in a situation where you’re deciding, should I accept a particular crypto or not? That should be handled by this exchange with a giant legal team and strong relationships with all the regulators. It’s time for Tony’s Steak Two. Thank you, Kate. We will have a new president. My thinking is around our national nonprofit community. Um And I feel that there’s potential for some of our work to be uh defunded or threatened or, or just minimized. And if we see any of that, we all, all of us have to speak out against it. We can’t only support our, our lane, our mission. We all need to stand together as a nonprofit community. So, like I’m thinking, there’s the potential for nonprofits that do work for uh immigrants rights. LGBT Q plus rights people who fight climate change, those who product uh protect uh reproductive rights and women’s health. Those of us who are advancing public education, fight for uh uh fighting for economic justice and equality and equity, protecting vulnerable populations. Those who work for safer gun laws, advancing social justice and the rule of law. Those of us who champion first amendment rights of speech, assembly and religion, the folks who promote a free press, those who assure ethics in government. Those are the ones I have so far that you may very well think of others. It might be your work or the work of other nonprofits. But the point is that we need to stand up for the work of each of our nation’s nonprofits, not just as I said, not just our own lane. Um, and I’m very willing to say, you know, if these things don’t happen, you know, if, if agencies, uh, aren’t threatened, if, if there, if there isn’t that kind of trouble then, uh, you can call me, uh, an alarmist. I’ll, I’ll accept it six months a year from now. If it’s not happening, Tony, you’re an alarmist. But I do think it’s more likely now than it was before the election. Um, and some of the things I’m thinking of potentially, um, maybe a tax on the, uh charitable deduction, maybe carving out some nonprofits that are no longer considered 501 C three and, and eligible for the federal charitable income tax deduction. That would be enormous that some people, some nonprofits donors can’t get a deduction anymore for giving. Um, it could be rhetoric, you know, it could just be talk whether it’s official or it’s just some random asshole or so it could be some official asshole. Uh, you know, or it could be some random official. You know, if, if we’re talking, if we’re hearing, talking down missions or even specific agencies, we need to all call that out it. We, we, we have to stand together. Um, maybe, maybe the federal government starts unfairly favoring some nonprofits over others in, in some other way, you know, beyond the charitable deduction or rhetoric. We have to all stand up for each other, please. Because if we’re divided, then our community is weakened. We all need to stand for each other. And I do think the potential is there because the country did vote for big change and we’re gonna see it. I also want to salute my fellow veterans, Monday where the show is being published on Monday the 11th Veteran’s Day. I admire your service. You made enormous sacrifices to serve the country in any of our military branches. So I admire that service. I salute you on Veterans Day and those are the issues. Those are the things for Tony’s take two, Kate. A lot of things might change. But what will never change is the love for our veterans. Thank you guys. That is very well said, Kate, you’re right. We can never waiver our support for our veterans and, and our admiration for their service. Well said, well, we’ve got bookoo but loads more time. Here’s the rest of accepting Cryptocurrency gifts with Pat Duffy contrast in exchange which you just explained very well with wallet wallets, which you’ve, you’ve mentioned a couple of times. Uh, what, what, what’s the difference here? Well, well, first, what is a wallet? What is a wallet? And then how does it differ from an exchange? Yeah, this is why nonprofits should be set up with some even if it’s not us. But like a solution that has an exchange account and everything else because donors will often tell nonprofits just pop open a wallet. So for each of these cryptocurrencies, you can participate in them and move value back and forth by having what’s called a wallet. So, like we talked about with Bitcoin, there’s an end point where the Bitcoin we’re sending needs to go and there’s an end point where the Bitcoin was originally sitting. So those are referred to as wallets. So exchanges when you’re holding, um, Bitcoin on exchange, for instance, they have the Bitcoin wallets and they’re holding on to the keys to those wallets. Um You’re kind of giving over the security component to them similar to when you’re buying and selling stocks on a lot of these exchanges. You don’t actually have like a paper stock sitting in a safe somewhere. Um This would be the equivalent of that paper stock example, but digital. So you can actually have Bitcoin sitting in a wallet that you have and it’s your own wallet that you can open up, not a wallet held by the exchange and you can take that Bitcoin keep it in a wallet. Um, that only you have like a private code phrase to get into. So that was the original idea behind the technology. This, when you hear it decentralized and disintermediating, like part of what’s really cool about something like Bitcoin or theorem is you can, if it was just you and I, and we were working on some deal, I was building you a fence and I wanted to send you money. I could send you that full amount of value using something like Bitcoin for my wallet years without ever needing to use an exchange or a lawyer or someone else as a middleman. And the code is written to allow for that. And, and if II, I remember this about wallets too. If, if you lose your, if you lose the key to your wallet, that’s it. You’ve lost, it’s like a 16 digit code or something like that or maybe it’s even longer. I don’t know. Maybe, but if you lose the key, you’ve lost what, everything that’s in your wallet, you can’t prove, you can no longer prove that, that you owned what, what was in, what is in your wallet that you can no longer access. Yeah. And that’s the trade off. There’s a lot of misinformation on this or I wouldn’t even say misinformation. But misunderstandings like, um, the only way that can happen to you is if you lose the information, right. So on, there’s nothing, there’s no security issue with the technology when you hear, like this person lost $100 million of Bitcoin. It’s like, well, it’s like losing your email password but you can’t get another, like, be careful with it is what a lot of people say. Like, if you’re gonna do that, like, then if you have $100 million and you lose the information you wrote down about it, like it’s kind of on you is done. And then the, there’s an inverse to that too, which is sometimes exchanges that you’re trusting with that money. Um, they get hacked and now people think about that as a Cryptocurrency hack. But it’s actually the opposite. What the crypto people will tell you is like, well, if you had your Bitcoin sitting in a wallet and you had the private keys to no one could have ever taken it. So in both scenarios, people think about it as a, uh, Cryptocurrency and security issue, but it’s actually the opposite. There’s a 0% chance you will ever lose your money if you have it in a wallet in your own private keys unless you lose the password. Now, if you’re, and like my parents and other folks, like they will lose that password. I know it just put it on the exchange because the odds of an exchange being hacked for crypto is still less than even traditional banks and find it. Like, it’s, they’re very regulated, they’re very secure. It’s the same as having money in a bank. And a lot of the like cash that you have there is FDIC insured as well, just like you would in a bank. So like there’s a lot of reasons to use an exchange for institutions like a nonprofit. You should definitely be using exchange, not a wallet because if you put in the wrong code and you send it somewhere. It’s not supposed to go, you can’t get it back and if you lose the code that you wrote down to get into that wallet, you can’t get it back. So if you’re very careful and pretty libertarian in nature, it’s an amazing technology for actually having stuff, but being able to move it, um, online, it’s like having gold in the safety, you can actually use to buy goods. Um, but if you’re not that specific person just use an exchange. It’s, it’s like having a bank account. OK. OK. Let’s move forward then to w what we, what we uh like we wanna bring this to our board or our, you know, we’re not, we’re not the CEO we’re gonna bring it to our vice president. Help folks. Um uh We’ve done a lot, we, we’ve, we’ve done a lot of that already. I was gonna say help folks make the argument. But what, what would be steps that we would take? I mean, II I think is there, I think we’ve helped folks understand what it is. Why it’s valuable to accept. Uh Are, are, are you ready to move to? How would we, how would we start to implement a AAA crypto acceptance platform? Yeah, absolutely. So if I were a non bro, let’s say I’m, I’m talking to the board, I’ll just like hit the key points here both in terms of the why and the implementation. I would say there’s trillions of dollars invested in it. There are Bitcoin theory, ETF s. Now on the actual stock market, every hedge fund has it or is moving money into it. Every millennial or gen Z has some invest this way if we want to grow our major gift program, which generally speaking, probably has an average donor age of like mid sixties um and not slowly have that eaten away if we want to win out the Great Wall Transfer. Um We want to get a a younger, more robust uh donor base that actually has major giving potential. Like we wanna grow this nonprofit and kind of not get left behind by a very serious financial trend. Like this is a donation method. We need to accept kind of point blank period like it just needs to be an option for our donors. Um Now, in terms of how we implement it, there’s a couple of really important things we need to do. One. We need to make sure that it’s easily discoverable on our website. Um This mistake has been made with stocks, with donor advice funds, sometimes even with bank transfers where it’s really hard to find alternative giving options. Um which is why platforms like ours, in addition to this donation form that we give to nonprofits, um We aggregate all of our charities on the giving block.com with a search bar where donors go search for charities that take crypto and give and we get tens of millions of dollars donated through that channel because donors look on the nonprofit site, they don’t see it and then they just go to Google, Google take this donation. It’s too, there’s too many tax implications for me to not give it directly. We don’t want to be that charity because like every day so it goes to the giving block looking for some heart related charity, they don’t see it. So they give this giant crypto donation to American Heart Association instead, like our donors need to know we take this. So I would take seriously like our ways to give menu and then like the donate button on our site where it takes you to this giving interface. Like I wanna make sure that I’ve got a very clear other ways to give type options, crypto stop donor avi funds a bank transfer. Like let’s get that infrastructure right? So when donors are on our site looking for a way to give, they’ll find this if they’re looking for it. Um Then two, I would say in terms of how we integrate it on our site, I would remind the board and it’s a copy and paste donation form, just like anything else. There’s nothing crypto technological involved here. All of that is built into the code on the back end, we are just pasting a giving form on our site where donors select which crypto they wanna give, enter their details and then send uh money. What happens for us is that crypto hits an account, it cashes out, it swept to a bank account. We get cash as if they use the credit card or anything else. But the donor gets the crypto giving journey they’re looking for. So to explain that we are accommodating the best in class crypto donor journey. They can send money from any of the major exchanges or wallets, etcetera. It’s fully accommodating. And for us, we’re just getting cash. This price volatility concerns which cryptos we take, how do we hold it? When do we hold it? All of that is off the table. These things have been solved for. Um And then the real conversation from there is like, how do we fundraise it? And that final step is one that a lot of nonprofits missed our 1st 30 clients that we signed for the giving block were charities that already took crypto that we signed over to our product instead. Not even because our product was so much better. It had a lot of features that were good. Um But because we knew how to fundraise it and we helped them do some basic stuff like talk about the fact that they take it on social and add in other ways to give button in their capital campaign emails. We added QR codes to the direct mailers people were sending out and people started ho their phone over a piece of paper and sending $50,000 in Bitcoin because so it’s available for them. Um, those sorts of considerations often get missed and then you could still do all of those other things. Right. And end up being one of these great nonprofits with a donate Bitcoin button that just sits somewhere collecting dust because you never really told your donors about it. Um That’s the final consideration. Do you have any more fundraising tips? Oh, yeah, I mean, sure. All right. Well, uh infinite. Uh That’s a lot. But uh we could, we could do with AAA very small, finite number like two, just another couple more fundraising tips because it’s very analogous to gifts we’ve been taking for, for decades and generations. I mean, you, you mentioned, you know, talking about it on social, uh adding a button making it clear on your ways to give, drop down menu. Yeah. So to reassure folks that this is not so something esoteric and uh, I don’t know, forbidden or, you know, whatever nuanced share, share a couple more simple, you know, fundraising methods. It’s, it’s probably an overstatement anyway. I’ve probably got, I’ve probably got three good ones and then a bunch of share a few more. But yeah, so to your point, I feel like this is, it’s, it is fundraising advice. It’s, it’s like a bit more um high level but like just pretend it stocks is like a really important thing for every fundraiser to think about for at the organization. They just pretend it stocks. What would you do. And unfortunately, for a lot of nonprofits, when you make that list of what you would do for stock, what you realize is everything you’re writing down you’re not doing for stocks. You know, like, well, I’d make it really easy to find on my website when I am having a major gift meeting. I would of course, bring it up as an option with the donors because maybe they don’t think of their stocks as a donation method. They think of it as an investment. And maybe this donor who gives us 10-K a year is like, well, the S and P is up 25%. Like I would, can I fulfill my $100,000.10 year pledge right now because I have a huge tax incentive to do it at this. It’s like I would have it featured there. I would make it really easy. Again, I put a QR code that opens up this giving page slash form so younger people could send this stuff from their phones. I would make sure that if I’m sending a capital campaign email that like this is such an important giving option with a way higher average gift size, like let’s make sure it’s easy to find. So think about it like a stocks is what I would say first and foremost. And then the second piece I would say is blended with stocks and with donor advised funds, right? And with these other tax efficient giving options, if you take real estate, whatever that is, blend it all together. Because what that solves for is one of the biggest sticking points for nonprofits donor segmentation and strategy. They’re like, who is a crypto donor? How do I know when to ask for crypto versus something else? How do I find a crypto donor in my database? Like, how do I know for sure that I should be asked for crypto and not these other things. It’s really hard to figure that out and it takes time and depending on the quality of your data and Wealth engine tools, like not every charity has availability um or access to those things. If you just take crypto and you mix it in with stock and that whatever other things you take. Now, suddenly every email you send makes sense. It could be going to every donor you have at every agent just goes, hey, we take tax efficient options like stock d crypto, et cetera, right? It’s, it’s all directly analogous to forms of giving that you just named. I mean, how do you know if somebody has a donor advice fund? You don’t? So you could just mention in your, in your, in your over your lunch that, you know, you know, donor advice funds are, are, are a great way to give. Stocks are a great way to give. We accept Cryptocurrency, you know, and there’s something resonates with somebody then they’ll say, oh, crypto, crypto, oh, I have a donor advice fund. So, you know, you don’t need to know, you know, just like you don’t need to know someone’s wealth necessarily to ask for a gift. You can look at their giving history and you can just promote, promote it in the same breath that you’re promoting stocks and stocks and donor advised funds. And we accept, we accept crypto as well. 100%. No, you nailed it and it, it’s helpful to know. It’s nice to know. And even then it’s a lot less complicated. People think leave cryptos up a lot in a particular year. And you have these donors who gave crypto the last year, like my version of stewardship is like, we just email donors and we’re like, hey, cryptos up a lot like you feeling generous and if crypto is down a lot, sometimes we’re like, hey, we know crypto is down a lot. Like we’re not gonna ask you for money right now because it’s the way you like to give. But maybe you could introduce us to some friends or run a fundraising for us, maybe some like, like maybe there’s other kind of crypto things we could be doing. Like it’s helpful as an indicator, but it’s to your point, it’s not necessary you can just open up the options. And I guess the last thing I’ll say is that if you’re trying to get them to come out of the woodwork. A match is so powerful for all these giving options. I, until we started this company, like it’s, it was seven years ago and still throughout this period, I’ve never found a nonprofit who independent of us did a crypto specific match, a stock specific match. A da A specific match. And das was always the one that blew my mind the most. I’m like, there’s $260 billion sitting in accounts earmarked for charity. It’s the only money these donors have that they can’t spend anywhere else. It’s already sitting in, it can only ever go to a charity and what they’ll probably do, especially if they’re in their thirties or forties, they’ll let it sit there for decades and they’ll add it to an estate plan eventually. Like there’s no urgency they got the taxes out of when they parked it there. So how do you get the money out? Like if a donor gave me 25 grand tomorrow, I go. Can I use this as a match? They always say yes, you’re like, yeah, but why not help you fund raise? And I would just put an email out and be like if you have a DA account will match the next 25 grand in given. And I wanna know who in my donor base, who has the debt, how much will they send? And once I get 1000 bucks for someone who has one of those like now when I’m steering that donor, like how much money do they have in that account? Can we block it in as a commitment to us? Like, you wouldn’t even have that conversation without prompting it? So, in short matching the specific giving options occasionally, especially with the targeted email to particular high value donors, let’s say really nice way to get people coming out of the woodwork in addition to just sprinkling it in as a passive option. Let’s talk a little about something you you mentioned in passing like to flush it out a bit. Uh mining energy consumption. Uh The popular press uh explains that uh these, these mining operations can be very energy intensive. Let’s uh can you flush that out? I don’t know if you can reassure folks, but at least explain what it is. We’re explain what it is that I’m talking about. I’m explain, explain, explain to the listeners what I’m talking about because I don’t, I don’t fully understand it, but I know there’s a lot of energy behind all these calculations and proofs and they have uh they have an energy, they have an impact on our energy infrastructure. No, 100%. So there’s like there’s warehouses with these computers, like thousands of them sometimes and they’re like running these computers that are trying to solve um these proofs to authorize transactions um for a network like Bitcoin in particular, like it requires the most they use crypt or cryptographic proof of work is what it’s called. And there’s a lot of value in it that other types of um networks don’t have in terms of like the utmost security and traceability and everything. Like it’s, it does a lot of really powerful things, but it uses more energy than it should. However, it’s exponentially less than is reported. Um because a weird thing happened, like the, the media more or less than it came from a Columbia research thing that was like quickly debunked, but no one seemed to care. Um They confuse what’s called a block with a transaction. So we talked about it earlier. You could have one transaction like one Bitcoin transaction that goes out to the network. And if it was the only one, that’s all that would be in one of those blocks on a Blockchain. So once uh once the system gets a block, then the computers all fight to try to figure it out as fast as possible and it cracks the code. But when there’s a lot of transactions happening in each of these blocks, there’s usually between like 1000 and 2500, they took a number like the amount of dollars per Bitcoin transaction. And I think they said it’s like 100 and 5 to 100 and $35 worth of energy per transaction. One, if that were the case, no one would do it. Obviously, just everyone would be losing a ton of money all. Like it just mathematically, people should have seen that number. But like, well, that’s impossible. Obviously, people wouldn’t spend more than what they’re sending hundreds of thousands of times a day. Like, it’s just not a thing. Um But you, when, once you divide it down, it’s like a few sets of transaction for the most energy intensive. So like Bitcoin and a zillion zeros and ultimately a decimal like fractions of a cent for every other Cryptocurrency that uses proof of work with these more efficient systems. So even at that scale, it’s a ton of energy for something like Bitcoin and people are always trying to find ways to make it more efficient. Um but it’s exponentially less than what’s reported. And I think it’s inarguable that Bitcoin is still more efficient than the traditional financial system. Like no one runs numbers saying like, well, if we want to use banks, like we said, we have infinite skyscrapers and commuters and like lawyer, like there’s just an infinite amount of waste and energy and like little sheets of plastic getting dumped into landfills to like make traditional finance work. Like the Bitcoin ecosystem is not nearly as significant as I feel like people reported on. Um However, it’s definitely the least energy efficient of the cryptocurrencies and it’s like, it’s a good thing that people are like, let’s make it a lot more efficient because it’s using more energy than it should over time. I’m just kind of like you said about the postal service. I’m betting on Cryptocurrency even something like Bitcoin over the next five years in particular to become exponentially more efficient. In the same way, I would bet on emails over time being a less energy intensive way to move mail than like the post office. Like, just having code versus infinite, like actual physical infrastructure and commuting. Like, it just, it’s a better bet from an ecological standpoint even though it started off, I think, pretty inefficient. OK. And, and that’s where a lot of the press came from. All right. Plus this, plus this misunderstanding that you said was debunked. But you know, the that rarely sees, sees a lot. It gets anywhere near the number of eyes as the original reporting does. OK? All right. Um What, what proportion of all the crypto transactions is Bitcoin? Is it, is it an enormous proportion? Is it, is it, is it as outsized as it seems uh to, to AAA non crypto investor or, or do you know what? It’s a great question. I don’t know if there are more versus all of the other cryptocurrencies out of all the transactions as the denominator. How many are, are Bitcoin in the numerator? I’d have to look usually not a lot. So what’s interesting is a lot of people because um Bitcoin requires more energy like this is what happens, right? It requires more energy to send a Bitcoin transaction. It costs more to the users. Um They tend to move their funds using different networks. Um So even people have like Ethereum, which is more efficient than um Bitcoin. It gets kind of technologically. It’s, it’s, it’s not extraordinarily complicated. But what happens is like, you can take a Cryptocurrency like Ethereum and you can what’s called rapid. So you can have a asset that’s sitting on a different chain. So like, let’s call it solana totally different Cryptocurrency. Um You can have a asset sitting on the Salana chain that’s just pegged to the value of Ethereum. But you can move it across their network at which point you can then move it back on to like a the, you cash out the salon and you exchange it for a theorem. So people do that kind of stuff all the time, um where they’ll move Ethereum or they’ll move Bitcoin or other assets, but they’re moving it across other chains that use less energy because it saves everybody money. So I’d have to see the actual number. I think it’s a Bitcoin is, I think more than half the total crypto market cap. But I’d be shocked if it was more than like 10% of the overall network activity. Like I think a lot of people tend to move value on some of these newer cryptos that, that got a bit more efficient. But in terms of the total value, it, it’s, you’re saying a little more than half yeah, a lot of people park it, they treat it like a lot of people call it digital gold. Um It’s the least um the least volatile versus some of these other cryptos that just have smaller user bases and more kind of uh speculation on it. Um So a lot of people will kind of invest in other cryptocurrencies and they rotate back into Bitcoin in the same way. Some people rotate back into like cash or gold uh store value type thing. It’s valuable. You make all these analogies to the, the traditional, you know, the longest established um stores of value methods of exchange. No, because I think it’s comforting for folks. You know, it’s, it’s just like, you know, you promote stock gifts. You, you accepted, you decided to accept credit cards 40 years ago, et cetera, right? You know, there’s, there’s value in these analogies that are based on known understood uh exchanges of value. Oh, definitely. I mean, I wouldn’t understand. I have a political science degree. And the other guy that I found the company with was the crypto guy. Like he got me into it and like it took a lot of these types of analogies for me because I was like, it’s sounds like vaporware, it’s backed by nothing. It’s just like code based money. Like I don’t. And then he was like, no, it’s the double spend problem. It’s like, wait, this is the only kind of money you can’t counterfeit. He was like, yeah, I’m like, that’s very valuable. That’s interesting. And you can’t make more of it. Yeah. So it’s like, cool. But you could actually move it like you can move it like, instantly anywhere, like, yeah, and then you can write code that moves it around and it’s all, like I say, yeah, I’m like, this is ok, I get it. This is kind of cool. This does a lot of things that nothing else does. He’s like, yeah, that’s why people are buying it. They’re not just dumb. I was like, OK, it makes more sense. I, I, one quick thing on this, I listened to a podcast before starting the company maybe six months before where I’ve gotten into trading crypto at all. And I went on a trip with friends and which, you know, we drank beers and we were at the beach and I talked about 10 people out of ever buying crypto because I listened to this podcast and I was like, backed by nothing. It’s paper and I told everybody about it. Just traditional financial guys I was listening to and then eventually got into it and invested and like, never circled back with some of those people. And then they saw that we had started the company and the stuff we were doing and I tried to like, what the hell dude, why didn’t you tell me to buy this? It’s like quadrupled. And I was like, I was being gen, I wasn’t trying to trick you. I just didn’t get it yet. Not only why didn’t you tell us to buy it? Why did you tell us not to buy it? I was adamant before six months before you co-founded a company based on the, the exact, the exact store of value that you told people to avoid. All right, I needed to do some research. You’re a hypocrite. You’re a hypocrite. All right. All right. Leave us, leave us with some closing thoughts. Pat or, or maybe there’s something we haven’t talked about that. You want folks to know, I’ll throw that out first before closing thoughts. Anything, anything I didn’t ask you, maybe that you want, you want to talk about? Uh I touched on it lightly but it’s a timing thing. So, uh Bitcoin almost hit a new all time high yesterday, like the market’s done really well this year. So in a year where crypto is down, you have significantly less people who have appreciated assets uh to donate for that tax incentive. Like this year is uniquely good for that. Like we’ve had a huge recovery and are looking at new all time highs. Um And then the other piece is the end of year giving for crypto similar to stocks, um is even more extraordinary than um the end of your search we see for things like cash because they’re trying to get up against that end of your tax deadline. So a lot of these transfers happen in November and December. So the main thing is like, if you’re a nonprofit who isn’t taking crypto now is definitely the time to consider it seriously. Um You don’t wanna be like, we’ll look at this in February of next year just from a timing standpoint. Like it’s a really, if you’re at all thinking about it now is the time to like have a conversation and do a bit of research. Uh Just cause like for us, generally speaking, in that end of year window, it’s like 60% of our donation volume um in just a couple of months versus the rest of the year. So it’s a significant um fundraising opportunity. Ok. That’s a good place to wrap, I think because we’ve talked a lot about why do it, what, what the value is? Thank you. All right. This is the, this is the time, it’s the fourth quarter and values are very high. Pat Duffy co-founder of the Giving block at the giving block.com. You’ll find Pat on linkedin. Pat. Thanks for sharing your, your wisdom, your uh your expertise on this and uh your hopefulness. Thank you. Yeah. Thank you so much for having me. This is great pleasure next week, scaling altruism with Donald Summers. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you find it at Tony martignetti.com. We’re sponsored by donor box, outdated donation forms, blocking your supporters, generosity. Donor box fast flexible and friendly fundraising forms for your nonprofit donor. Box.org. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martignetti. The show social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation. Scotty be with us next week for nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95% go out and be great.