Tag Archives: philanthropy

Unheralded Giving

circa 1962:  Promotional headshot portrait of American comedian and talk show host Johnny Carson, for the talk show 'The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson. He is wearing a striped blazer. Carson began his thirty-year run as host of the late-night series in 1962.  (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

We learned last week that Johnny Carson directed over $150 million from his estate to his foundation. The transfer was only discovered through research by The Smoking Gun. The gifts of securities and royalties were never announced by Carson or those affiliated with him or his foundation.

In the Jewish tradition, based on Maimonides’ degrees of charity, anonymous giving is among the most admired. A few years subsequent to Maimonides, in 2009, The Chronicle of Philanthropy reported increased anonymous giving.

This reminds me of the high calling of quiet, unheralded giving. How refreshing and admirable it is to see a 9-figure unannounced donation. There are surely others that never get exposed and they are equally worthy of respect. I know there are many much smaller anonymous gifts and I hope you have been privileged to work on a couple of them.

Carson’s giving isn’t strictly anonymous, because the John W. Carson Foundation is (I’m guessing) widely known to be his, and that’s where the grants to charities come from. But his silent funding of his foundation with an enormous gift reminds me how revered the anonymous donor is.

Nonprofit Radio for August 6, 2010: Social Media for Nonprofits and Using Social Networks for Fundraising.

Big Nonprofit Ideas for the Other 95%

You can subscribe on iTunes and listen anytime, anyplace on the device of your choice.

Tony’s Guests:

Regina Walton, Principal of Organic Social Media, on whether you should, where to start and what to do with social media.

John Murcott, Vice President, Karma411, on using social networks for fund-raising.

Here is a link to the podcast: 004: Social Media & Online Fundraising

This Friday from 1-2pm this week and every week!


Also, there is contest for my show!

Name the Number!

The call-in number for my show is 877-480-4120. It’s toll free, but not very memorable. Give my number a name. Create an acronym or acrostic sentence, using the letters on the phone that correspond to those digits. We need something clever and memorable, so listeners can call quickly when you have a burning nonprofit question.

Hint: 0 and 1 don’t have letters. Be clever and imaginative, for you will be rewarded.

The prize is winner’s choice: 1 complimentary hour of Planned Giving consulting, or a free copy of my book, “Charity Registration: State-by-State Guidelines for Compliance.” The prize goes to the winner’s favorite nonprofit.

I’ll judge the entries based on adherence to the number/letter scheme and cleverness. I’ll announce the winner on the show on August 20th. Send your entry to me by FB message, Twitter DM, LinkedIn message or email.


Top Trends. Sound Advice. Lively Conversation.

You’re on the air and on target as I delve into the big issues facing your nonprofit—and your career.

If you have big dreams but an average budget, tune in to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.

I interview the best in the business on every topic from board relations, fundraising, social media and compliance, to technology, accounting, volunteer management, finance, marketing and beyond. Always with you in mind.

When and where: Talking Alternative Radio, Fridays, 1-2PM Eastern

Sign-up for show alerts!
View Full Transcript

Nonprofit Radio for July 30, 2010: Relationship Building and Fundraising & Risk management and Insurance strategies

Big Nonprofit Ideas for the Other 95%

You can subscribe on iTunes and listen anytime, anyplace on the device of your choice.

Tony’s Guests:

John Hicks, President & CEO of J.C. Geever, on foundation relationship building and fundraising.

Brian Flood, Vice President of The Flood Group, on risk management and insurance strategies.

There will be a link to the podcast posted here after the show.

This Friday from 1-2pm this week and every week!


Top Trends. Sound Advice. Lively Conversation.

You’re on the air and on target as I delve into the big issues facing your nonprofit—and your career.

If you have big dreams but an average budget, tune in to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio.

I interview the best in the business on every topic from board relations, fundraising, social media and compliance, to technology, accounting, volunteer management, finance, marketing and beyond. Always with you in mind.

When and where: Talking Alternative Radio, Fridays, 1-2PM Eastern

Sign-up for show alerts!
View Full Transcript

Steinbrenner’s Yankees Spending As Philanthropy

381058 13: New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, right, talks with New York Yankees owner George Steinbrenner October 30, 2000 after the Yankees'' victory parade in New York City. The Yankees defeated the New York Mets four-games-to-one last week in the city's first Subway Series since 1956. It was the Yankees'' third consecutive World Series Championship. (Photo by Chris Hondros/Getty Images)

George Steinbrenner was widely known as a philanthropist, especially in Tampa, where he lived much of his life. That was the usual brand of philanthropy and his reputation is well deserved.

I’m positing something different.

Could his lavish spending on the Yankees franchise be a form of philanthropy? It benefited the public and philanthropy is a public good. His Yankees spending brought all kinds of division and World Series titles to New York City and gave fans enormous boasting rights.

Is that not a public good? Especially considering the team’s miserable condition when he bought it in 1973, when it was more a reason for embarrassment than a source of pride.

I don’t mean, “was it legally philanthropy,” or “charitable” as in the Internal Revenue Code. I’m not suggesting his expenses were deductible, or anything of the sort.

But since his money brought so much joy and pride to a city’s people, can we say his private spending was philanthropic? Weigh in and let me know what you think.

The Corporatization of U.S. Nonprofits

Courtesy of TW Collins on Flickr.
Our country’s nonprofits are swiftly becoming more like their for-profit corporate counterparts.

Recently, Reuters told us nonprofits mimic the language of Wall Street, but for years donors have demanded to be treated as investors, and the institutions have obliged, referring to “returns on investment” and negotiating gift arrangements as contracts.  More recently, foundations and individual donors have insisted on outcome metrics, best practices, benchmarking, social impact and performance standards.  All of this was unheard of 7 to 10 years ago in nonprofit communities.

Donors and grantors are not alone in creating this change in culture and enterprise organization.  Federal and state governments also unite our nonprofit and profit-making corporations.  Since Sarbanes-Oxley reforms were levied against the profiteers in 2002, serious talk about identical improvements has trickled down to those with a calling higher than profit.  (I’m uncertain what tone to take about this: lamentation; resignation; pride; excitement; exhilaration.)

To my recollection, “board development” didn’t exist 10 years ago.  At the least, it wasn’t nearly as much a part of the nonprofit lexicon as today.

Our Internal Revenue Service, through its agents and tax-exempt commissioners, measures, and pronounces about good governance, accountability, financial integrity, transparency and oversight.

State Charity Registration laws, which I study, write and speak about a lot, have been enforced more in the last 18 months than anybody I know can remember.  The IRS stepped in here, too, probing more directly in its heavily-revised Form 990, an unusual instance of a federal agency asking about compliance with purely state laws.

Even the legal form of the nonprofit enterprise is becoming indistinguishable from its counterpart.  Several states have adopted the Low-profit Limited Liability Company, or L3C.    Profit is allowed but must not be the primary objective.  (By the way, you should pay attention to Gene Takagi, publisher of the blog at that last link.)

Nonprofits are becoming more like companies.

Part of me longs for the charming days, when do-gooders came together, appointed their parents and friends to boards, raised money, and did their best with heart and head to make a difference in their community.  We cannot return to that time, and we shouldn’t.  But I partly miss it.  It was so much easier.

I’m between resignation and excitement, closer to the latter.  Funders and governments demand change and nonprofits are complying, looking more like for-profits, at a pace that is accelerating and will not reverse.

This brings enormous, promising opportunity for smarter, more efficient execution of charitable missions, which should mean better service to those in need throughout the world.  (That sentence hits on several subjects debated by bigger thinkers and more august personages than me.)  Look at organizations like charity: water and The Center for High Impact Philanthropy to discover the possibilities.  (At The Center, I commend Autumn Walden to your attention.)

What examples do you see of the corporatization of nonprofits?  Are you excited by what we’re witnessing?  Do you miss the old days, or am I alone?