Renee Rubin Ross: Your 5-Step Inclusive Strategic Plan
The author of the book “Inclusive Strategic Planning for Nonprofits,” talks you through her strategy of kickoff; discovery; prioritization; planning; and, implementation. She makes your plan a valuable, living resource, rather than a dusty volume sitting on your shelf. Renee Rubin Ross is CEO of The Ross Collective.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
And welcome to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host and the pod father of your favorite hebdominal podcast. Oh, I’m glad you’re with us. I’d bear the pain of chromycosis if you infected me with the idea that you missed this week’s show. Here’s our associate producer, Kate, with what’s coming. Hey Tony, here’s what’s coming. Your five-step inclusive strategic plan. The author of the book, Inclusive Strategic Planning for Nonprofits, talks you through her strategy of kickoff, discovery, prioritization, planning, and implementation. She makes your plan a valuable living resource, rather than a dusty volume sitting on your shelf. Renee Rubin Ross is CEO of the Ross Collective. On Tony’s take 2. We’re at 26 NTC. Here is your five-step inclusive strategic plan. It’s a pleasure to welcome back to nonprofit radio, a recognized leader on board and organizational development and strategy. Doctor Renee Ruben Ross is the founder and CEO of the Ross Collective Consulting Practice. Her new book is Inclusive Strategic Planning for Nonprofits, a five-step Process to expand Energy, alignment and Opportunity. Her company is at the Ross Collective.com. And Renee is on LinkedIn. Renee, Ruben Ross, welcome back to Nonprofit Radio. So good to be here. Last time we met, it was, we were in person at NTC a couple of years ago. It was the one of the NTCs a couple of years ago. Um, this is less hectic and, uh, and longer. We have more time together. Congratulations on the new book. Oh, it’s so exciting. Yeah, thank you. I know it’s a huge undertaking. Congratulations. Congratulations. Lots of people have books in mind that that never get written. Yours, yours as. Well, it took a few, it took some time and lots of, lots of support, which we could talk about, but, um, lots of, it was an inclusive process actually to, to write this book. Yeah, Outstanding. Then you’re, then you’re walking your walk. Very good, very good. Um, I don’t know if I called this out when you. And I were at NTC together, but, you know, I’m a huge fan of alliteration. And you are Renee Ruben Ross. I just love that your family was able to put it together and then, and then you, yeah, did you marry someone named Ross and Ruben is, yes, my partner is is, yes, your partner Ross. So I, yeah, I love it. I love it. It all came together, Renee, Ruben, Ross. I like our three. Triple R R 3, you’re like, you could be a ranch or to, uh, to do, you know, make that happen really besides, you know, no, I’m sure, but good fortune. I wish my family, I’d like, I, I, I, I wouldn’t be mine like Matthew Martinetti or I don’t know, I don’t, I don’t wanna change my surname, but maybe the first name. But no, I, I’ve, you know, I’m a big, I’m just a big fan of alliterations, so. So let’s talk about inclusive strategic planning. Why don’t you, why don’t you, uh, I mean, just high-level view. What is inclusive strategic planning? Yeah thanks for the question so um so one of the one of the key ideas in the book is there are different people who participate in planning and what what I was trying to get at is there’s a lot of books that are about the the tools and the process and all of that and um I you know refer to some of those but what we’re talking about what I’m talking about in this book is really about who is in the room doing the visioning and building. The goals and the importance of making that an inclusive process so I have this one graphic which is this idea of um deciders, builders and sharers and a lot of processes have deciders that’s pretty obvious what that is a lot of processes have sharers those are the people doing focus groups interviews, all of that sharing their perspective it’s really the builders that make this unique and that is having a wider group who’s going. To be weighing in on their own future and I think that in these times more than ever we need people we need to incorporate people’s perspectives in whatever’s gonna happen next we need people to feel like my voice matters, my, my perspective matters and and that’s what an inclusive process is. So this is not a strategic planning process that the board goes off onto a retreat at a country club for, for a weekend. And comes back, uh, they’ve met with the CEO and maybe the chief development officer and the CFO, and then they, and then at the end of the weekend, we foist on the nonprofit, the 3 to 5 year strategic plan, the 5-year strategic plan. That that’s not, this is not that. I teach a class. I teach a class through Cal State East Bay in strategic planning, and I have a lot of people that come to my, I have some people that have come to my class. Who have experienced strategic planning trauma exactly what you’re describing where it’s like wait we got this thing we don’t know where it came from we don’t know who thought of this this doesn’t make sense to us we don’t feel invested in it and all of that and so this is this really from the beginning it is designed in to say. Um, who are the people who are, who first of all, who, for example, um, I’m doing a retreat tomorrow and the many of the staff members will be there talking about their perspective on the on this organization’s work. Uh, talking about, you know, their experience working with the young people that the organization serves, and then they get to then the staff and the and some of the board members as well get to build that final plan and and set their goals, all of that and that really um it creates a plan that people feel like yeah this is doable we wanna do this these are the right next steps for our organization. Well, you’re getting the buy-in from the people. You’re saying like the builders, to me, the builders sounds like, uh, uh, I’m making an analogy to, to middle management. It sounds like it’s the middle managers. You’re getting buy-in from the folks who the plan. Largely impacts because they’re the ones carrying out the strategic plan. Yeah, and by the way, I mean that, thank you for that point. Um, so one of the things that, that I did in writing this book, I actually, I had a manuscript, and then I, um, I did, I opened it up to a lot of beta readers, and I got a lot of, um, a lot of feedback. And one of the pieces of feedback was, well, who is this book for? And originally, I, like, in my mind, originally it was like, oh, I’ll just, this is a book that I’ll just give to prospective clients and they’ll understand. And our work better. But then people said, no, you know, these processes can be used by a lot of people. So I think that the builders could be every, if it’s a small organization and you have a working board, it might be that the whole board, and there’s one staff person, the whole board and what that one staff person, that those are the builders. It may be that the board and staff together are builders and it also might be like we work with with an organization. Um, recently or a couple of years ago that they had 55 people who came to the retreat and worked together with us to say, you know, what do you, what do we, we have this question, what do we, this visioning question, what do we want to see in place in the next 3 years as a result of our actions, so it’s a practical vision and. Everyone in the staff got to, got to, you know, based on our the work that we’re doing every day, here’s what we want to make happen so it doesn’t have to just be, I mean, I think it depends on the size of the organization, obviously, um, we just heard from an. Organization that has over 100 employees, it’s really difficult to, you know, you are gonna, not every, not everyone’s going to be able to be in the room in that kind of case. Yeah, I just meant it as an analogy like it’s, it’s the, it’s the middle management of strategic plan implementation. Like these, these are the folks who are gonna be doing the work to carry out the plan. So you’re, so you’re getting the buy-in of the, you know, the builders. You, you call them the builders. Um, you, you, so you’re, you’re including them in the process. Obviously, if they’re included, they’re, I, I think it’s obvious, they’re more likely to be enthusiastic about it. Rather than what I laid out, you know, the country club plan after a weekend with the board, and, and, and half the strategic plan was developed over, over glasses of wine, right? Or, OK, someone says that we’re supposed to raise $3 million but that’s not very realistic for, you know, the fact that we have the, the development staff that we have now, you know, so do a year fundraising operation, the $3 million is not realistic in the next 3 years. All right, all right. Um, OK, so, you know, you, you’re bringing people in, it’s, it’s, it’s equitable, um, inclusive. How do we know? When we’re ready for. A strategic planning initiative. What do we need to have in place? What do we need to think through? What do we need to maybe do for the year before leading up to, you know, what, what, like, how do we get our head around, like, if we feel like we, we, we, we, we, we could use a vision for a 3 to 5 year plan, what, what do we need to have in place first? Yeah, and so this is such an important question. Um, I think that there is a lot of information about strategic planning out there. And so sometimes we hear. From people who will say, oh, I’m, you know, I’m starting on my organization. I want to build a strategic plan and no, you do not need if you’re about to create what you if you’re creating an organization, what you need to do at that point is actually start building your organization. You don’t need to, you don’t have enough complexity and actually, you know, time under your your time and time of running the organization to start doing a real. Deep strategy work, um, so I have a, a little grid in the book. It’s also on I’ve written about this in the past where you can look at two questions, uh, what is our programmatic stability and what is our financial stability, and you want both of those to be, uh, you want at least one of those to be high and hopefully both of them, uh, before you start to do some strategic planning. So if you’re not there yet, there are things you can do you can, uh, do an action plan for the year and think about, OK, we know that right now our fundraising is a little wobbly. What do we want? What are some steps we can take in the next year? Who’s gonna do those steps? And I do have a section in the book about action planning. Um, and so either both looking at your financial stability and also your programmatic stability, do we have a sense of our core programs and how well they’re working? OK, I was just gonna pull on that a little bit. What, what does programmatic strength look like? Yeah, I think, uh, a track record of success basically like if um you want to be able to say, um, we know this is working, it is, uh, wrecking we’re getting some funding for it from the community we have some client, you know, we, we have some client feedback that this works, all of that and so, uh, we can keep building on it basically, OK, and financial stability, what does that, what, what is that? Is that the x axis or the y axis? Programmatic, right, which it doesn’t really matter. You can do either one. They’re, they’re both got the two axes, exactly, and you got, so you got 4 quadrants. OK, it doesn’t matter as long as you got the 4 quadrants. All right, what is financial stability is really, um, we have a sense of where our funding is coming from, um, that, uh, we have some, you know, whatever our funding model is, it’s been worked out versus we have no idea where we’re gonna get funding. For next year that’s not the time to do strategic planning if that’s your situation, the first thing you really want to do is shore up your finances and then OK then let’s come back and um strategy is much more about what choices are we gonna make now you know OK we have we have a couple different programs maybe we’re gonna need to um stop doing something because our work is getting complex and there’s a lot of demand for it. And both of these would Suggest that, well, not suggest, demand that a new organization like you were, you were suggesting, you know, hypothesizing new organization wants to start strategic planning. They have no programmatic stability. They don’t know if their programs work. They have no outcomes yet, and they don’t have financial stability because they’re a new organization. They don’t, they don’t know where their funding is gonna come from. They don’t even know if they’re gonna get funding. So, like a, you know, a, a 1 or 2 year old nonprofit shouldn’t be engaged in strategic planning. Right, um, I mentioned this, um, this case in the book of a couple of years ago working with SOS Meals on Wheels, uh, here in Northern California and the challenge that they had was that, uh, the executive director had a lot of conversations with the board, a lot of conversations with the staff, and people hadn’t really come together to figure out what. Focus on um and one of one of the things that emerged in in the plan was, OK, we need a bigger kitchen and that will allow us to do more, you know, more deliveries per week and then we won’t have to be, or I guess it’s actually fewer deliveries per week so we won’t have to be driving our trucks all around. Just by coming together and agreeing on this, they were able to make it happen within a year and it’s really kind of amazing and it wasn’t like something that no one had ever thought of it was just getting that alignment of getting everyone in the room to get that focus. And that’s really what, what, uh, strategic planning is, but just going back to, you know, what we were talking about when you’re just starting out, you don’t, you don’t necessarily need to get everyone aligned. You kind of just need to start doing your work and prove that it works. Yeah, right, get out there, and, and, and meet folks and do the and do the work. OK. What are the, what are the deliverables of a strategic plan? What, what kind of, what are we looking for from this? Yeah, usually, um, a this kind of practical vision, uh, we will look at the mission statement and look at some often look at mission statements from comparable organizations think about what kind of language are people using now and does that need to, you know, does so does the mission statement need to be revised and then we’ll, we’ll create some strategies and goals. And we go to a one year implementation plan and really uh often we’ll be working with organizations to take that implementation plan and put get it into the work plan of the organization so you’re going from 3 to really mostly 3, a 3 year plan, 3 years to 1 year to quarters to what is the uh weekly work of the, of, you know, of people on the staff. OK, OK. And I, I know implementation is the, the 5th of your 5 steps, but it’s so critical because there’s so many plans that just get written and created and then, I don’t know, just put on a shelf. I mean, they’re not, they’re not referenced. You know, that’s a, that to me that’s that that that was just a wasted exercise like check mark, check mark, check box. OK, we’ve got a strategic plan we could, we could tell the funders we have a strategic plan, right. And so I, so that’s where, so a couple things. So one thing is we talk a lot about this is process and product. So as you’re Going along you want to think about uh what is important to me? Why do I care about this and that that really goes in the plan and so by the time you have a plan created that um it’s something that makes sense right? that there is that that energy and alignment but at the same time. Yes, you’re absolutely right that and I think that um people are, it’s like, OK, we’re going to get to the destination and then in our and then we’re going to stop there. It’s like, mm, well, and in my book, I actually talk about this thing, this phenomenon of the place where our problems are solved, right? Yeah, this is not it. We, we may have in mind, you know, maybe if I just, I don’t know, you know, if I just, uh, found a partner, if I just whatever, had children, if I just, uh, you know, got a certain education, wrote a book, right, or created a strategic plan, all problems would be solved. And I, I would be the first to, I wish life worked that way, you know. And and it doesn’t and you need to know that you need to know that you will have your plan but then new questions will emerge and and some of them are around um are there things we need to stop because that actually is being strategic to say we can’t do everything um that we’re we’re a great organization there’s a lot of demand from the community we cannot do everything. Um, and then the other piece is, yeah, how do we slow down and really, um, if we’ve been always reactive, can we start to think about where, how do we, um, determine what we’re focusing on and find, create a system to put that into our, you know, to, to our work plan and that and it’s not easy. I, I, you know, it’s not easy, yeah, I’m glad we spent some time on, on the implementation even though it’s the final step. I, I. Yeah, it, it, it deserves a lot of focus because there, this is a big undertaking. Uh, it can be expensive in time and money. Um, and it, it takes a lot of thought. You know, it’s not something you can task somebody. I mean, you know, task in a half an hour, I need your contribution to the strategic plan, please. It’s 1 o’clock. I, I, I need it before you go to lunch. You know, it doesn’t, it’s not like that. So, we’re investing a lot into the process. It has to be, it has to be carried through. In, in, and, and implemented and used and relied on and, and looked back to and, and counted on. Right, right, right. And, and, and by the way, I mean, oh my gosh, so many things to say about this by the staff as well as the board. And so that is, you know, when, when I talk with an organization, I will say, well, how often is the staff referring to the strategic plan? Um, how often is the board, you know, what is the board responsible for in this plan and how are they doing on that and what else? Is there to talk? I mean, there should be, and I do talk about that in the book too. There should be sections for the, for the board as well. Maybe that’s around fundraising or oversight or whatever it is, um, connecting, you know, making connections for the organization, being that serving in that ambassador role, um, but the other piece is that it is important to sketch out. OK, now that we know what our, our goals are, who’s gonna be responsible for those goals and how and do we have the capacity to, to do this? So we had an organization that created, you know, there are different tools you can use as an RACI, which is responsible accountable, and there’s a couple of different, I don’t know if you’ve heard of that RACI chart, I think it’s called Rock Rocky or something. And um, you gotta watch that, you gotta watch jargon jail. I gotta, I gotta, I gotta lock you up in jargon jail. If you, if you can’t, if you can’t define the acronym, you can’t use it. Uh oh, OK, well, um, I hadn’t heard of this before, but our client was using this, and it’s, so it’s like different people have different roles in project management, basically. That’s what this is about. And so what they found out was that this poor executive director was going to be responsible for. 15 new initiatives, you know, and there was just no way that that was one or two, right. And so, so what they had to do was, again, slow down and say, all right, this person, they, we want to implement the strategic plan, we’re going to need to hire somebody who’s going to be, who’s going to be working on some of these pieces because we don’t have it in our current configuration. So thank you. I, I, I wanted to spend time on the the value of the strategic plan, uh, uh, that, that we’re investing all this time and money into and, and how it needs to be, you know, the, it is, it’s the plan. So follow the plan. All right. But let’s go to the five steps, which are, I’m just gonna tick them off quick. Uh, kickoff, discovery, prioritization, planning, and implementation. What’s our, what’s our kickoff step? What is that, so now we decided we are ready. We’ve done the, we’ve done the, the groundwork to, uh, to make sure that we are financially and programmatically. Stable, uh, we, we did have a lot of discussion around which is the X axis and which is the Y axis, but we were able to overcome, we were able to overcome that, that, uh, dissension within the organization. No, no, no, program is the ground. It belongs on the ground. Program should be the X, and the finances should be raising. All right, so we overcame, we overcame that, uh, that, that conflict within the organization, and we, we decide we’re ready. So what is our, what is kickoff. Yeah, kickoff is, is really, um, is to set it up to try to, so if this is an inclusive process, then being more open and transparent about information. Uh, what are, what is planning? Some people may have done a lot of strategic planning in the past. Some people are very new to it. What is the step? What are the steps gonna be? People have questions around, um, how much time is this gonna take? And, and so, and then also starting to figure out who’s gonna be, uh, who will be those sharers, right? Who’s gonna be consulted in interviews and focus groups. Possibly a survey and uh you know, is there gonna be some we usually do a day or a day and a half retreat when is that gonna be? um and even being transparent about about decision making again is a way to say OK these are the final deciders is this group all this this other larger group is gonna be the builders and. These other people are going to be sharing their perspective. Um, so really that kickoff is really just setting it up and um trying to help people, you know, have this be a fun learning experience, decreasing some of the feelings of, oh, I don’t know what this is, and so I feel worried that it’s not going to go well, you know. So you, you said, uh, you usually do a day and a half retreat. So now we’re now going back to the, we’re going back to the country club. Somebody sponsors us. They got a room at the country club. It’s probably got a nice fireplace. Uh, maybe it overlooks a golf course or tennis courts. Maybe it’s a tennis, could be a tennis club. It doesn’t have to be a golf club. I, I like tennis. So, uh, maybe so it overlooks the tennis courts. Uh, you know, there’s, there’s catering coming in. Are the are the builders and the sharers, they’re invited to the day and a half to bring their builders are the builders are coming to that. The builders are, yeah, our retreats are often at the, I don’t know, the, the park, you know, like the park, uh, parks can be great. Oh yeah, I’m doing the stereotype a little hot in the park, you know, but, but OK, here we’re. California, you know, or, or we’ve had, you know, hotel, hotel boardroom, conference room, all of that, but you do make a really good point which is it is way easier if possible, if possible, not always possible, but try to have that retreat somewhere that is not your office and really set the expectation that you are, you know, you’re out of. Office, you’re not having meetings, you’re and please order the food ahead of time. Oh my gosh. Um, I can’t tell you how many, it’s a few times early on where some, you know, they have the executive director. It’s like, OK, what is your vision for the future? And the executive director says, I’m sorry, I need to go figure out what we’re having for lunch. It’s like, no, no, you know. So, um, so yeah, so plan your future, not, you know, plan your lunch the day before. This is all about, uh, you know. Timing. If you’re at the park, maybe you could grill, you know, if there’s open grilling, maybe, maybe you could grill or, or, or have it delivered to the park. All right. Um, all right, so the sharers, well then how do the sharers share their, their contribution if they’re not invited to the. Lots of ways so it might be um sometimes um if we’re the you know we’re the consultants we will do interviews and focus groups you can also if you’re doing this project this process yourself it’s so easy to set up a Google form and just and put some questions in there and then. Uh, you, uh, would say, OK, we have, I don’t know, we have 10 staff people or 5 staff people, we’re each gonna do 4 or 5 interviews, we’re gonna put them in the Google form and then we’re gonna spend some time at the retreat sharing what we learned from those sharers. It’s time for Tony’s take 2. Thank you, Kate. All this week, nonprofit Radio is at the 2026 nonprofit Technology Conference. In Detroit, Michigan. I’ve never been to Detroit, so I’m looking forward to that very much. Should be some fun, have some, uh, some meals at a couple of nice places, hopefully in, uh, in Detroit. We are, of course, as we do every year at NTC we’re capturing lots of interviews for future shows, interviews with people who are leading sessions at NTC. These are smart technology people, helping you use technology better, more efficiently, more productively, choosing the right technology in some cases. All for, uh, you know, for efficiency, mission improvement. I love taking the show to NTC year after year, and this is our 12th year going to a nonprofit technology conference. Um, I love it because N10, the host of NTC is just very generous with space and working with us to get the interviews all set up in advance. Um, They’re just, you know, they’re, they’re just great partners. You know, it’s, it’s a pleasure to work with people who want to work with you, you know, who see your value, you see their value as well. It’s a pleasure. So that’s why 12 years running, and I’m sure we’ll go 13, uh, this time next year. I don’t know where next year’s is though. I think it’ll be West Coast cause they go. East Coast, Central, west, and then back to east. Last year was Baltimore, this year’s Detroit. So somewhere on the West Coast next year. Doesn’t matter. Nonprofit radio will be, will be with them there. So that’s where we are. Look forward to all those interviews coming up. In future shows with all these smart technology folks at the nonprofit technology conference. That is Tony’s take 2. Kate, Safe travels. Thank you. We’re recording in advance, of course. So thank you. Thank you. She’s, you know, here I say this week and then she blows it saying, you know, gives it away that, no, I think people know that, uh, the show must be recorded in advance because it gets published every Monday, so. We’re not, we’re not a live stream, so no, you didn’t, you didn’t blow it. You didn’t blow it. Thank you very much. We’ve got Beu butt loads more time. Here’s the rest of your five-step inclusive strategic plan with Renee Rubin Ross. Part of the kickoff, you know, you’re laying it out, what’s it gonna look like. Some folks have never done it before, or the, or, or our process may be very different than what they participated in at some other nonprofit or the same nonprofit 10 years ago. So how do we describe it? What, what is it gonna look like? Um, so a couple different things we, we will share, um, some of the meetings that we’re gonna be holding and talk about, um, some of the, um, some of the conversations we’re gonna hold as well that we are gonna be doing some visioning, uh, and that. Strategic planning really focuses on how is our organization adding value? What’s the most valuable thing that we’re doing right now, and how do we do more of that, uh, you know, yeah, I mean there’s a lot of different ways to say that, but I think that is the essence of it and um. That is, it’s not a, it’s a subjective question. It’s actually what do the people in the room who are doing the work feel is the most valuable part of the work. So there’s no pure answer to what’s most valuable. It’s actually what do we care most deeply about and that is what we’re gonna build a strategy around, you know, and, and obviously that’s informed by donors. That’s informed by um by what by what’s that data by data that’s informed by you know what we’re learning from yeah from our from working with clients from working in the community all of that but ultimately it isn’t it is what do those the people who are building the plan feel is most important and needed to focus on. OK, OK. Does, does, does this process include small groups? Like, can you, do, do we, do we ever send off a small group to think about this and a small group to think about that and then we come back together, or, or no, is it all, is it all a collective? No. No, um, so, so actually, although you just mentioned kickoff, so we’ve really actually talked about and we’ve already talked about almost all the stages of this because you kick off a lackluster that’s the problem. That’s the problem. It’s they’re all connected. They’re all connected. OK, well, they’re interconnected. OK, good. So we’ll, we’ll still go, we’ll still go through them, but, but, so, yeah, so can you have small groups working and then coming back and reporting and OK. So one of the things that we do at the retreat, which is a part of like planning and prioritization, which is those 3rd and 4th stages, is to start to reflect on what was learned in um in the discovery work and and that we usually do that in small groups. And we’ll have, you know, we’ll do a kind of, we’ll do a SWAT that is a kind of breakout, you know, like where you’ll say, OK, one group needs to talk about strengths, and one group needs to talk about challenges, one group can talk about opportunities and so you put that all on these, you know, you have people define, let’s define SWAT for folks. You have, you have a big jargon jail problem. Big, big, I mean, you’re still in jail from, uh, OCR or ROCR RACI ACI. So, all right, SWAT is, uh, you’re, you’re evaluating strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, something like that. It’s a little SWAT, isn’t it? Isn’t that, isn’t that SWAT? Yes, that is, yes, that is a SWAT. OT SW you don’t really talk about threats. Our process, but we, but we do talk about strengths. We do, so we sometimes call it a sorry, now you’re really going to send me to jail because we call it a sore where you have some, it’s more of a positive, uh, positive 10 really? Oh, that’s interesting. Wait, so I mean there are threats. I mean threats is not a bad word. There are, there are potential threats like that you know we look at weaknesses. Weaknesses or concerns, risks attrition, staff attrition, maybe staff attrition has been a problem. That’s a threat. All right, weakness. All right, well, or weaknesses or risks, weaknesses or risks or threats. All right, all right. So we got like sore road, whatever. All right, yeah, all right, I think it’s strengths, opportunities. Yeah, it’s funny. I don’t know what all these stand for. But it’s, it is a positive based type of, um, type of, you know, conversation where people come together and, and think about it though there are different tables, each table is working on one of these questions, so that is one way that we do. Um, we do breakout rooms and the, the, you know, breakout groups. The, the really fun part of that is at the table you might get somebody who joined the staff last year and then another person who has been on the staff for 10 years and, and so it’s a chance to not only talk about uh what are the strengths but also to hear from each other about how the organization has changed and some of what’s happened over time. So it’s really pretty cool. I’m, I’m curious about, uh, Renee Rubin Ross, uh, Triple R. Have, have you always been a, a planner, like as a child? Were you a, a planner, organizer type? Oh, that’s so interesting. I think that um what what I um what really interests me is, is frameworks and um thinking about and that’s actually a reason why it has been really fun to write my blog over the past, you know, about 5 years now and now make turn it into a book and think about, OK, uh, each time we do this, we get. I, we get better at explaining it and sharing content, sharing um like how do you go from um the vision to strategies and we have a step by step. So, um, so yeah, so creating, I’m very interested in creating that clarity for people around what’s going to happen next. And was that you in childhood, like your teen years? Were you, were you helping friends understand? What’s coming? Like, take it step by step. Were you that, that, uh, huh, that’s a good question. You’re that kind of kid. Um, I think that I do have a lot of curiosity and I like explaining things and so I was at one point interested in being a journalist, um, and so, yeah, so it’s like asking questions and creating clarity, uh, so. That people feel more comfortable and I think that is a lot about what this process is is being um showing how the process is gonna go so even what we talked about kick off so that people are feeling less of a sense of um concern you know if they’re if they’re new to strategic so you you like were you a comforter you comfort your. In childhood, did you comfort your friends, say, you know, here’s what’s coming, it’s gonna be OK. Are you a comforter? I think that, I think that, um, I, and I write about this in the book a little bit too, is, um, I personally as a kid did not feel so included. And so I think a lot about what is it, what does it mean to be included in something? What does it mean to feel like my perspective is valued and is honored and how for myself, how do I build spaces where people feel that way and for now it’s really around all different kinds of identity whether that’s, you know, me as a white person in in allyship with people of color or you know so around uh race disability. Uh, LGBT, all kinds of identity. How do we build spaces where everybody is honored and respected, and man, that is more needed than ever in, in these times. Yeah. Were you, were you like me, like the last person chosen for the, uh, pickup basketball team or something? I mean, are you kidding? I was hiding on the other side of the, oh, you, you weren’t even, you didn’t want, you didn’t want to play. Alright, I, I, I was definitely, I was definitely geeky, but I could see things that other people, you know, it was like very insightful, and I think like that, like what, what did you see that other kids didn’t see? Um, I guess, you know, power dynamics, who, who is talking, who’s not talking, um, how are people being treated, um, even, but also what, um, what’s the step to find a solution to something, but so you need to find that solution, but you also need the influence, right? to implement, yeah, I’ve got the solution, but I’m not, I’m not one of the cool kids. So people, so people don’t listen to me. All right, we’re very simpatico. I’m mean, like I was a backstage, I was a backstage geek, you know, uh, lighting, audio, worked the, worked the backstage console, cameras, things like that, AVA audio visual, which was, uh, disparagingly in, in, no, I was in high school from 80. What, 74, 76 to 80. Yeah. So, right, 76 to 80. So, I was in AVA, the audiovisual AIDS, but, you know, to, to, uh, to, uh, to make fun of, we, we were, to make fun of us, we were, we were called gay VA, you know, because it was in, in the, in the early 80s, you know, oh, you’re gay, you’re gay, you know, of course. You gotta, you gotta recognize the time, the time that I’m explaining this. So, you know, I was the backstage. So, so you’re saying, you know, you were like, uh, you were, you were not in the, in the, in the cool click either. Like, not like smoking in the girls’ room. That wasn’t you. Um, no. No, and I wasn’t even, I was too shy to even, you know, be the, be one of the theater kids as well, you know. Well, yeah, I was in theater, but I was, I was behind the stage. I was backstage, right? I was, I was too shy to even do that, you know, but I have, I mean, I have a lot of empathy, and I really think about in these times, how to design and so that everybody has a voice, and that is in a very, you know, that’s again, we, we use technology to part. Participation is a structured way of designing conversation so that we truly if we’re sitting in a large group there’s ways where you sometimes you, you break it down and people can talk in their small groups sometimes you make sure that you, you can talk to everybody in the room that has a, you know, way of weighing in and um people feel that their voices matter and to me that matters and that’s interesting. See that came from you feeling voiceless. Uh, as, and unincluded as a child. So it’s, it’s wonderful that you’re, you’re developing systems and processes that are inclusive. I mean, inclusive is the first word of your book. Right, and I think, right, and I think, I think you know that’s, that’s very common, right? People say they, they’re finding healing in something that was hard for them. And so that’s a real spot of, wow, I want to make, I want to build a different kind of world going forward. Yeah. How about step two discovery, even though, we’ve blended them all together because I keep asking you questions that make you digress, but I’m curious about, I’m curious about these things. How about discovery? What is that? What’s that phase? Yeah, it’s really so as we talked about a little already, that is those those interviews and um and focus groups, um, and sometimes the survey, um, it’s really and there’s a lot of different reasons for doing this. I think like that’s. Something that is important to be clear about is that um you, you get a lot of information, it’s not always actionable, right? And, and that is part of the process and you, you, you need to again, just be transparent about that. Uh sometimes. We’ve had the experience of doing some amazing focus groups where people were thrilled with the organization. We’ve also had some really hard ones where people were not thrilled with the organization. And in either case, you just say, OK, we’re going to be, we’re sharing this back anonymously. We are gonna take this under consideration. Not everything is actionable, um, and that’s kind of what you have to, what you have to do if, uh, if the leadership is, you know, is doing a good job, they will, uh, work on some of the hard stuff that comes up, but it might, they might be working on it already and it also might take some time, you know. OK, and that, that leads to step 3 which is prioritization. Mhm mhm. can’t be everything can’t be the first the first priority of course. Yeah, and I think this question, so this idea in um in top facilitation we do the practical vision there’s different kinds of visioning. One is like what would we need to, what would the world need to look like in order for us to close down, you know, and you sometimes hear these we want a world where every person has enough water. You know, has food to eat and da da that’s great. That’s very inspiring. The problem is like, wait, OK, how do we get from here to that? So the practical vision is much more, um, just what’s going to happen in the next 3, what are we going to do as a result of our actions and, you know, what do we want to see in place as a result of our actions and it’s, it’s powerful. It’s powerful. And what do we want to see in place like over the next 3 years? Correct. What do we want to see in place over the next 3 years? Sometimes 5, and sometimes we will go through the whole thing and then people will say, well, this is really inspiring, and we said 3 years, but it’s actually more like 10, you know, and that’s OK. I mean, but at least you kind of know where you’re going and you know. So the kinds of things that come out, it would be like um more funding sources, um, um, serving, you know, another serving additional clients in X area, um, a very satisfied staff with higher salaries and different kinds of things. Those are some like just on one hand I mean there’s there’s many different things that come out of this but um basically that the organization is um has more sustainability and stability and that people feel good about working there and feel good about the work. What about the funding of the strategic plan? Should that shouldn’t that be a part of the strategic plan? How are we going to fund the, the increased salaries, the additional, the additional positions? Shouldn’t, shouldn’t fundraising, funding it, just how we’re gonna pay, how are we gonna pay for the strategic plan? Shouldn’t that be a part of the strategic plan? Yes, and you just reminded me, um, that, um, so a couple things. So first of all, when we do this work, one of the things we do in discovery is we do a fiscal review, and that is. Looking at the past 3 years, um, what are the, what are the budget trends and it’s reflective, like a small small group conversation with often with like the board, treasurer and CFO, executive director, we create a report that we then talk about at the retreat. So, um, so that planning is like the foundation of planning is understanding the finances of the organization. Uh, you’re not understanding every line item, but you know what is the general trend for this organization? OK, so that’s one thing and then yes, we, there’s, there always needs to be um part of the plan that is that focuses on, uh, on funding when that doesn’t. Occasionally that won’t come up and I will say, OK, as a good, you know, consultant, I feel my responsibility is to tell you that you need to make sure that this plan includes some, some goals around funding just to, to be, this is not just program, this is how exactly what you said, Tony, how are we going to fund, um, the, the work that we want to do otherwise implementation is gonna fall flat if we don’t have the money to fund the plan. Then what’s the point of having the plan because we can’t execute it because it requires more money than we can, than we have a plan to raise. All right, I feel like, all right, well, we’re gonna, we’re gonna persevere with the 12345, even though I brought you in all kinds of different directions. Um, I think we’ve been more like 5132, you know, that’s OK, but that’s why it’s a spiral because each, it’s an iterative process. I saw it is, it is a spiral. Yes, it is a spiral, um, so planning, planning is your 4th, planning is your 4th step. Is there anything that we haven’t said about plan? I mean, this is, is this the creation of the plan. Um, that is where you start to get into your goals. Is this a day and a half retreat basically. Um, I would say, yeah, the retreat is, is about, is focuses on prioritization and planning, OK? And, and, and then the planning, which is planning is really, um, starting to work on those goals. That it continues through, um, that continues after the retreat as well because you usually draft your goals in the in the retreat, but like a lot of things you they may need some work, um, some additional work. Do you drill down to, uh, either OKRs. Which is objectives and key results or KPIs. Notice how I define everything, key performance indicators. Do you drill down to OKRs or KPIs, sometimes not, not at the retreat, but yes, we do have, we have worked with organizations that that’s the way they work and that’s what they want, in other words, I think dashboards are, I think. OK, so what overall you need a system that you are going to implement. Don’t make it too complicated. If you have a 20, if you have a 50 page document that you are not gonna, that’s just gonna sit on your shelf, it’s not the right system, OK. However, if you have a dashboard that where you can, um, easily say. Uh, yellow, green, or red, and you know what that means for each goal, that’s great. That is, you know, then you can see how you’re doing on your plan and what you need to work on next. So it’s, it’s really what is the. Culture of your organization, what kinds of things do you track? Do you need to strengthen your systems that may be something that comes out of the plan, right? And, and what’s gonna be useful for you that isn’t gonna feel so bur you plural, that isn’t gonna feel so burdensome. Yeah, I mean, I don’t know. Do you have a thought about OKRs and KPIs and, and all of that? I have, I have clients who have worked with both. I, I’m agnostic between OKRs and KPIs. I mean, I, I go along with whatever the, whatever the client wants to implement or whatever, you know, because I’m, I’m a narrow niche. I’m just doing planned giving fundraising in, in most cases. In most cases, that’s it. So, you know, I’m happy to contribute OKRs and KPIs if, or, or I should say or instead of and. If that’s what the system they work in, then I’ll be happy to contribute. Yeah, I don’t, uh, it, I mean, uh. Yeah, I, I can’t say that I have a choice. I mean, not that, not that I don’t have a choice in what they do. I don’t, I can’t make a choice between the two. I don’t see one being better than the other. My estimation, my limited role in participating in these with clients. Yeah, and I think it sounds like you have a similar approach which is all right, how do we build on in, you know, as a consultant, how do I build on what you already have and make, you know, what we’ve created make sense to in terms of the, the way your system is set up. So yeah, I just want, you know what, I just want to get out and start talking to folks about planned gifts for the, for the, for the for the organization. That’s whatever we could do to get start conversations. And, and reduce the, reduce the lead time and the lead burden, the better. So whatever I need to contribute to, yeah, I’m, I’m, uh, well, I’m either building on what they have. It’s usually very little because I’m usually inaugurating a planned giving program. So I’m helping them start from scratch. We’re identifying top prospects and what the plan is gonna be for each of those, and then the tier two prospects and what the plan is for that group. So, uh, there’s usually very little to build on. OK. In, in their planned giving. All right. OK. That brings us to our 5th step, implementation, which we covered in the 1st step. Is there anything more you want to say about how this needs to be a living document or maybe you just wanna re-emphasize that it does? Have to be, yeah, yeah, yeah, I think that, um, I, that’s great. I do want to emphasize that that it does need to be a living and I think that the, the idea that um This is gonna, you know, I think going back to what I said before, which is like knowing at the beginning that um that you’re not going to go to the place where all problems are solved, right? That there will be that new questions will come up. On the other hand, um, the positive of this is you you may have a lot more focus in your work and just going back to Um, SOS Meals on Wheels, when I was finishing the book, I reached out to them again to say how, you know, it’s been a few years, how did things go, and the executive director shared, well, what happened was that he started to get in this through doing this process, he started to think more about strategic opportunities and so in 2024 he had someone who came to him and was applying for a different. Different role and ended up being the director of advocacy and was really really excited about that and then with everything that happened in 2025 this person became invaluable in uh in make in fun making sure that funding sources were um were secured or were saved and you know he said that some of the some of what happened with this role was. Actually just preventing it wasn’t getting new funding it was just preventing funding from being lost but that all that never would have happened if he hadn’t been thinking about what is gonna happen next and how can I start to look ahead versus being so reactive um so that so there’s some shifting in thinking that happens just by going through the process. Triple R. Renee Rubin Ross. That’s her. That’s her. You’ll find her company at the Ross Collective.com. Connect with Renee on LinkedIn. Renee, thank you very much for sharing. It was perfect. Great, great explanation so much. This is so fun to talk about. I, I can talk about it forever. Unfortunately, we only have 49 minutes, but, uh, but no, I love, no, but your enthusiasm and the way your eyes light up sometimes when you, your eyes get big when you’re making some bold points like, yeah, that’s right. I love it. I love it. Love it. No, your, your, your passion for the subject comes out. It’s, it’s a pleasure. Thank, thank you. All right. Next week, sell your nonprofit. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you, find it at Tony Martignetti.com. Our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. I’m your associate producer, Kate Martinetti. The show’s social media is by Susan Chavez. Mark Silverman is our web guy, and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation, Scotty. Be with us next week for nonprofit radio, big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. Go out and be great.
Amy Sample Ward kicks off our coverage of the 2023 Nonprofit Technology Conference, hosted by NTEN. They cover the Conference details, and delve into weighing the benefits and risks of the fast-moving technology, artificial intelligence. They are the CEO of NTEN and our technology and social media contributor.
Renee Rubin Ross: Building An Inclusive Board Culture
Let us explore the signs and symptoms of your board’s current culture, and strategies to be more inclusive and equitable, if that’s something your nonprofit needs to pursue. Let us also dive into how to manage toxic people on your board. Renee Rubin Ross is founder and CEO of The Ross Collective.
Donorbox: Powerful fundraising features made refreshingly easy.
We’re the #1 Podcast for Nonprofits, With 13,000+ Weekly Listeners
Board relations. Fundraising. Volunteer management. Prospect research. Legal compliance. Accounting. Finance. Investments. Donor relations. Public relations. Marketing. Technology. Social media.
Every nonprofit struggles with these issues. Big nonprofits hire experts. The other 95% listen to Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. Trusted experts and leading thinkers join me each week to tackle the tough issues. If you have big dreams but a small budget, you have a home at Tony Martignetti Nonprofit Radio. View Full Transcript
Transcript for 636_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20230417.mp3
Processed on: 2023-04-18T04:51:48.972Z
S3 bucket containing transcription results: transcript.results
Link to bucket: s3.console.aws.amazon.com/s3/buckets/transcript.results
Path to JSON: 2023…04…636_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20230417.mp3.38847090.json
Path to text: transcripts/2023/04/636_tony_martignetti_nonprofit_radio_20230417.txt
[00:00:11.08] spk_0:
Hello and welcome to tony-martignetti
[00:00:13.08] spk_1:
non profit radio.
[00:02:02.99] spk_0:
Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95%. I’m your aptly named host of your favorite abdominal podcast. We’re beginning our 23 N TC coverage this week. And, oh, I’m glad you’re with me. I’d have to undergo counter immuno electrophoresis if you opposed me because you missed this week’s show. 23 N T C Amy Sample Ward kicks off our coverage of the 2023 nonprofit technology conference hosted by N 10. They cover the conference details and delve into weighing the benefits and risks of the fast moving technology, artificial intelligence. They are the C E O of N 10 and our technology and social media contributor also building an inclusive board culture. Let us explore the signs and symptoms of your board’s current culture and strategies to be more inclusive and equitable. If that’s something you’re non profit needs to pursue. Let us also dive into how to manage toxic people on your board. Renee Reuben Ross is founder and CEO of the Ross Collective on Tony’s take 2 23 N T C. Thanks. We’re sponsored by Donor box with intuitive fundraising software from donor box, your donors give four times faster helping you help others. Donor box dot org. And I’m sorry, my voice is a little horse because I did spend so much time capturing interviews at 23 N T C. Here is 23 T C with Amy Sample Ward.
[00:03:08.83] spk_1:
Welcome back to tony-martignetti, non profit radio coverage of 23 N T C. You know that it’s the nonprofit technology conference hosted by N 10. This is not our first interview today, but I’m sure that this is going to be the kickoff of nonprofit radio’s coverage of 23 N T C where we and you’ll find out why very shortly where we are sponsored by Heller consulting to technology strategy and implementation for nonprofits. The reason that we’re going to do this interview first of the many 20 to be exact interviews from 23 NTC is because with me now is Amy Sample Ward. You know who they are, the CEO of N 10 and our technology and social media contributor, which makes them the grand imperial wizard and Grand Poobah of the 2023 nonprofit technology conference. Amy Sample Ward. It’s a real pleasure to see you in person. It
[00:03:25.91] spk_2:
is wild to get to see you in person after all this time. I know I, I am touching you and I think I need to update my, my business card. The uh I have a whole string of titles now, I guess
[00:03:28.75] spk_1:
well, to the extent you’re willing to put on your business card.
[00:03:33.04] spk_2:
This was all a
[00:03:43.27] spk_1:
joke. But nobody uses business cards anymore. So I’m not offended. Although there’s this little stack of cards, I’m trying to get rid of. Still some people take them. Yeah, there are some, maybe,
[00:03:45.35] spk_2:
maybe they’re really helpful. Maybe
[00:03:47.33] spk_1:
they’re all boomers. I don’t know. But somebody, somebody’s, there are people who would rather not just scan a code, would rather take a physical card. So I have
[00:03:57.10] spk_2:
actually don’t even have business cards. You don’t, I don’t have business cards no longer if I wanted to
[00:04:06.11] spk_1:
no longer. Okay. That’s fine. Well, then don’t add it to your business card. Um We’re at 23 NTC. Congratulations.
[00:04:11.57] spk_2:
Congratulations happening. We are looking around at a big old hall. There are booths, there are people, there are snacks.
[00:04:21.96] spk_1:
How many people, how many people are here with us in Denver? We
[00:04:30.14] spk_2:
have 1600 people here in Denver. 400. That’s a lot of people online. Four
[00:04:33.31] spk_1:
104 100 virtual 1600 in person. Yes, we’re feeding 1600 people toilet ng for 1600 people. Yes, we have, we
[00:04:43.17] spk_2:
have lounges, we have many parks. We have everything.
[00:04:47.19] spk_1:
Yes, there’s, there’s a quiet room, there’s birds of a feather rooms. There’s yoga. There’s,
[00:05:18.21] spk_2:
did you see the, the everybody yoga out downstairs earlier? It was beautiful. It was like 50 people and it was yoga. You don’t need to have ever done. Yoga before you don’t need experience for everybody. You know, there were folks who were in chairs versus sitting on the floor, you know, and everybody was just doing it all together out in that big foyer downstairs. Yeah. Yeah, it was, it was beautiful
[00:05:23.26] spk_1:
wall of windows.
[00:05:42.24] spk_2:
Yeah. I mean, we can be at a technology conference but I think, you know, we’ve talked about this lots of times whether it’s the NTC or, or just how we think about technology in general. It’s actually not about the technology, right? It’s about people and people being able to meet the needs they have and honoring that those needs are different for different people. You know, like there have to be a lot of different lounges because you maybe want a different lounge that I want, right? Like somebody wants to not be talking. Tony-martignetti wants to be talking, you know, like to
[00:06:08.22] spk_1:
talk. Yes, indeed. Right. So you, yeah, you take care of the whole person, you the NTC collective, the collective. Yes, the collective. Absolutely. Um Today’s keynote. Yeah, I don’t know which of the three I was interviewing
[00:06:13.50] spk_2:
this morning was no ball.
[00:06:15.34] spk_1:
Okay. What was, what was their message?
[00:07:16.99] spk_2:
She had so many different things to talk about. And one thing that I want to call out and that encourage people to maybe think about themselves and go follow, go find she’s written books. She has lots of ways that you can follow her content. But this morning, we talked a lot about technology as a social economic and political practice. It is it is happening, you know, it’s not static, it isn’t just there. These are, these are ways that certain economic issues, classes dynamics are, are, are actively being managed. These tech through technology power, social dynamics are being managed, right? Like those things have been baked in from the beginning. So when we think of and we’ve certainly talked about this before, like bias that gets built into a tool. It isn’t just I like orange and you like blue or something, right? It’s biased that some people will forever be able to better use that tool. It’s bias that some people maybe never access that tool. That um the, the idea that we are in surveillance systems all of the time and we are kind of being told these are utilities, we must all use these tools right there. Their convenience, they’re making our lives better
[00:07:45.95] spk_1:
safety and security are often uh just justifications. Yes.
[00:08:51.14] spk_2:
Yes. And even if, even if it does feel this is this is the point that made this morning, maybe it does feel kind of casually better that the ads you’re getting are things maybe that you actually would consider buying versus something that’s totally unrelated to you that is not worth you. Your data being sold, used, misused and deciding who you are, right? Some of some of our data being sold um and being used by other, other. Well, anyone that isn’t us is deciding, can you get alone? Right? Can you do? Are we even gonna, like, actually believe that you can graduate from college? Are we gonna let you in? Are we gonna hire you for this job? Right. Um, so it isn’t just this like, I think we kind of, um, anim eyes it or make it, make it so generic that it loses a little bit of its harsh reality when we think, oh, the data is out there but whatever, it’s like my purchase history and I like that they recommended a good product, right.
[00:09:05.44] spk_1:
Right.
[00:09:56.03] spk_2:
But, but that same data set is determining if you know, like Sophia said in the UK, banks are looking at social media to decide if they’re going to give you a loan. Does it look like all the people that you’re connected to our, like historically separated from any access to wealth? Well, we’re not going to give you a loan. Well, then that means we’re not using, we’re not predicting anything we are deciding with that technology, right? This isn’t predictive analytics, this is restrictive analytics, right? We’re using this to gate keep and to continue to oppress people. Um And I think a really big part of that conversation too was we everybody here at the NTC and folks that are listening to non profit radio are folks who are both the users impacted by that and organizations in a position to maybe not realize they’re playing a part in that, you know, like, maybe you’re sending all of your users into those tools because it was easier. Or you thought they were already on Facebook or even if it’s not social media, you’re using a certain product and you didn’t realize that
[00:10:23.67] spk_1:
because you didn’t do your due diligence around exactly their privacy rules. Jeez. You gave me chills. I’m getting my synesthesia kicked in and I’m sure it’s not the air conditioning, that’s it. We need to show about this remarkable
[00:10:34.23] spk_2:
this,
[00:10:34.53] spk_1:
right? We could be contributing ourselves, right? Uh innocuous, unknowingly
[00:12:18.15] spk_2:
unknowingly, right? Um And she works um and as a faculty and leading a department at U C L A and brought up an example from the academic world of years ago when there was the tool that was being sold marketed to professors and universities that you could upload all of your students papers into it. And then it would tell you if they had plagiarized from the internet, you know, oh, that’s something else that already exists. And she and her colleagues immediately said, oh, this is not good. This is actually not good. And a lot of other folks like, what do you mean this means like we’re catching the students who were trying to plagiarize. Of course, we all know that means that small successful company got bought by a bigger company who knew what they could do with a big old data set. Right. So what just think if you wrote a paper in college when you’re still trying to, like, figure out your ideas and you’re still learning, like, the paper is meant to be a learning practice. It’s, it’s not meant to be published for the world. And now 15 years later you’re applying for a job and that shows up, you know, as part of your data record. Right. And maybe it has ideas that you fundamentally don’t believe now or even ever, but didn’t really know what you were saying and now you can’t get a job because people see this and say, oh, you wrote this paper. So as organizations, when we think we’re saving time or we think that we’re doing something by, by letting the robots do it so that we ourselves are not subjectively making decisions, right? We might actually be making even harder subjective decisions down the line for those people, right? We might be setting them up into systems where their data and their issues are.
[00:14:14.62] spk_1:
This is so enormously timely with, with all the talk about artificial intelligence, chat, chat GPT. The other ones I can’t name off the top of my head and, and our use our use of them. Look, there was a guest on maybe an hour and a half ago. He said we’re not going to know it was Maureen will be off. I think we’re not, we can’t stop this. It’s like trying to stop the the, the innovation around automobiles, you know, or the phone or trying to stop airlines, airplane, airplane flight, it’s not possible but are smart use of it and, you know, are constrained use of it. So I shared with this another thing you and I, you and Gene and I need to talk about this, the three of us together, informed, informed and, and thoughtful and, you know, I’m concerned about the, the more the likely less the due diligence, but just the thought that goes into it. My concern is that I shared this with Maureen and um the advice, a lot of the advice that I see is use artificial intelligence as a first draft. And then so you’re not, you’re no longer facing the blank page, put a pin, I’ll come back to that in a second and then you put your own tone to it, your own language. That’s exactly my concern. You’re reducing yourself from creative thinker working from a blank blank screen to, to relegate it to copy editor. And I don’t mean to insult any copy editors
[00:14:21.63] spk_2:
very valuable
[00:14:22.73] spk_1:
but not nearly as creative process as looking at a blank screen working from
[00:15:28.53] spk_2:
nothing. I think the really big piece of that is we have seen plenty of evidence. We do not need more evidence to know that what these artificial intelligence tools are providing to us is misinformation. The tool is not only giving us quote unquote facts, right? So it isn’t even that you need to add a copy editing layer. If you were to do that, you would need to go back and actually say, is any of this real like Sophia Sophia said this morning, they had received um you know, that other people in academia are making this point of, you know, oh, this is leveling the playing field, right? Because now folks who maybe aren’t naturally confident or comfortable writing and they communicate better in other ways. Now they could use artificial intelligence to help them get a jump start on the paper and then they edited and you know, whatever, but they have reviewed papers written in this way. All of the footnotes are not real articles, they’re not real books, right? Because artificial intelligence made up a book to reference. So
[00:15:38.17] spk_1:
the footnotes are not
[00:16:02.10] spk_2:
real, right? Because artificial intelligence was told to make a footnote. So it notated words in the format that it learned online is what a footnote looks like, right? So the idea that it is there, I like I like you’re saying, you know, the idea that gets us started and then we go in and like we judge it up. No, I mean, unless you’re using it for the outline structure of, I want an intro paragraph and then I want, you know, but what, what then is left that is viable. We are not helping people get a jump start. We are actively creating more in misinformation in in content.
[00:17:14.98] spk_0:
It’s time for a break. Stop the drop with donor box there. The online donation platform. How many possible donors drop off before they finish making the donation on your website? You can stop that drop and break that cycle with donor boxes. Ultimate donation form you added to your website in minutes. There’s no coding required when you stop the drop, the possible donors become donors. It’s four times faster. Checkout easier payment processing, no setup fees, no monthly fees, no contract required. You’ll be joining over 40,000 us non profits that use donor box, donor box helping you help others at donor box dot org. Now back to 23 N T C.
[00:17:24.69] spk_1:
There’s another layer on top of that because you mentioned the footnote specifically uh linkedin Post someone I I follow a lot on linkedin. He follows me. Um I think I can George Weiner at the whole whale whole whale. Um
[00:17:33.94] spk_2:
Who’s maybe here
[00:17:35.73] spk_1:
is George here, George,
[00:17:37.74] spk_2:
I don’t want to be part of this information, but I think that George might be
[00:18:11.92] spk_1:
here. His concern was he did a search of something that whole whale is very well known for. I guess it was, I think it was S C O basic seo basically. And um he did a search in artificial intelligence. He was using an AI tool for search and it came up with a top result that was taken from Whole Whales resource page or something. And it credited Hole, it did credit Whole Whale. His concern was that the next step would be, it would take from Whole Whales resource page and not credit Whole Whale, right? There was no requirement for it. So in this case, it was a legitimate footnote, but his concern is that it’s gonna be stealing his intellectual property and not crediting him in whole
[00:19:24.95] spk_2:
Whale. Because if you think about what artificial intelligence is doing is like at scale able to read all of the internet, right? We’re not able to read all the internet. It’s reading, not technically all of it, but like, you know, so much more of it than we could read without the kind of human context that we’re able to put on something. I know that on the nonprofit radio website, there are pieces of content where you’ve said, Amy said, quote blah, de blah, de blah, right? I work at N 10. My name is Amy Sample Ward. The idea that artificial intelligence would know to read the next sentence to know that I said the thing when that thing is all that mattered because it was relevant to what it was trying to create. And even if it did create a footnote, it would likely be non profit radio, right? But the radio show doesn’t talk, right? It wouldn’t be crediting you. So it’s already set up to fail.
[00:19:35.14] spk_1:
But even the greater likelihood is that it’s not going to credit anyone. It’s just going to take the it’s going to take the intellectual property,
[00:20:08.19] spk_2:
right? Of course. And so, you know, I think we’re over estimating what it could do and putting human expectations onto artificial intelligence that it can’t and shouldn’t, it doesn’t need to be human, right? But we are we are blurring the lines of what is best for humans to do and what is best for a data crunching tool to do, right? We did talk about things I
[00:20:26.90] spk_1:
feel like I’m drowning, drowning in the ocean that I live across the street from. Look. Um Alright, so we know we need to talk about this again, but I mean, I guess you know what we’re talking about is thoughtful use, but I’m not, I’m not convinced that humans are thoughtful enough to to to to thoughtfully use this wave. That’s the tsunami that that’s gathering such speed that even Elon Musk said, signed something that said, let’s take a six month pause, which
[00:20:45.04] spk_2:
which, which is ridiculous. Well,
[00:20:48.70] spk_1:
but, but the idea that there be a pause and artificial pause in in technological growth is absurd.
[00:20:56.52] spk_2:
So this thing, what we know of is not actually accurate to what has currently been developed that just hasn’t been released.
[00:21:02.62] spk_1:
I don’t know it’s happening nefariously and, and the Washington Post will uncover it in, in six months or something when it’s already too late.
[00:21:13.26] spk_2:
And I think
[00:21:14.47] spk_1:
the point is it’s not stopping and no, we need to be thoughtful, but I’m not, I don’t have a lot of confidence that were thoughtful enough beings to not take advantage of this
[00:23:18.18] spk_2:
about necessarily that were not thoughtful and we need to be more thoughtful. I think what, what I see at least, and here in the community is that folks feel like there wasn’t a choice. This was the only tool that was available and we’re sitting in the middle of a giant exhibit hall, right? With like 100 and 20 people. And there are people in here that do the same things as each other. You know, there’s no other nonprofit radio in here. But, but there are people, you know who do the same thing and the the illusion that we don’t have a choice as individual nonprofit organizations or as individual users of technology is a myth that is being over and over and over told to us so that we don’t go looking right? That we don’t unsubscribe that we don’t opt out that we don’t say no, you cannot have my data, right? Because that’s the say it’s the same story of you need this, this is useful to you. This is improving your life is also and don’t look behind the curtain. There’s nowhere else to go. There’s no one else, you know, because that’s, that’s the power that is the that is that political, social, economic practice that’s happening by technology to keep us as we are, right? And so breaking out of that is not okay. Everybody here has to go make their own tools. That’s not what I’m saying either. Even just knowing that there are options, pushes you into thoughtfulness because now you’re saying, oh, well, how would I decide between these? Let me ask some questions, right? And when we think there’s no choice, we don’t bother asking the questions. We don’t know what they’re gonna do when we sign up for their product. Right? So even just thinking, well, let me like, shop around already sets us up to be so much more mindful of what we’re doing with technology, the decision, the investments we’re making, you know, what products were putting our communities data into, you know,
[00:23:22.21] spk_1:
your consciousness, right?
[00:23:40.59] spk_2:
So I don’t think it’s hard to like turn that to go over that hump. And it’s not like we’re asking everyone to become enlightened on a topic that they’ve never heard about were saying just ask questions. I know that there is more than one option, right? Um And that already gets you moving the power back on to your side, right? They are answering to you now versus you feeling like, well, I just signed up and now now we’re using this tool, you know, you have
[00:24:08.84] spk_1:
options, you have options. NTC is one place to find out what those options are. 10 is thoughtful use of technology and 10 the courses and you can do them for certification for God’s sake. If you need certification diploma, they have them. Uh 24. Yes,
[00:25:07.14] spk_2:
Portland, Oregon. We really thought when we had the NTC in Portland in 2019. Um and we thought, oh, everybody loved it. We just got so much great feedback from the community that the city was fun and accessible, that restaurants were good, you know. Um People had a great time and we’re like, okay, well, we can come back to Portland. Let’s really put this a long time from now and now it will be, you know, we just had Denver and then we’re back in Portland because we had three years of not being on offline. So, yes, back in Portland, everyone on the team is super excited just to be back in a place we’ve been before and it makes all the decisions easier. Um We already have ideas for making it better. So, and, you know, we’re in Denver here, but we’re also online and there are sessions that are only in Denver, their sessions that are only online and then there are sessions that are simultaneously in both places. And let me tell you, we are learning a lot.
[00:25:20.41] spk_1:
There’s a lot of that takes a lot of technology support, especially the, the ones that are here and virtual.
[00:25:31.86] spk_2:
Yes, I would say in person stuff, you know, fine under control, you know, regular snap,
[00:25:36.15] spk_1:
totally
[00:25:54.20] spk_2:
online stuff also totally fine, you know, every once in a while somebody logs in the wrong zoom or, you know, whatever, but that’s fine. It’s the hybrid sessions where we have really asked a lot of technology and technology seems to still be deciding how it feels about us. What does it
[00:25:59.14] spk_1:
look like in those rooms? Can camera, can we see the the audience members who are virtual screen with all of them?
[00:26:35.76] spk_2:
Both places can see, you know, back between and we have and 10 staff person or one of our trained volunteers is a host on both sides so that there’s somebody who’s not the speakers or the attendees themselves trying to say somebody has a question or the questions over here or you know, like those two hosts can talk 1 to 1 and like own their side, right? So we have those two house, we have the actual like zoom and then we have all of the technology that needs to be in the Denver room to make sure that the microphones are sinking in real time to the stream to the video, to everything else.
[00:26:55.46] spk_1:
Yeah.
[00:27:59.56] spk_2:
And honestly, so far, knock on wood, I think we had a snafu this morning where, you know, and it’s like the perfect worst thing to happen. You know, the bad thing that happened was volunteers wanted to make sure that their sessions were great and tried to log in early to set them up early. And so they booted the session that was already happening. So it wasn’t like nobody came or nothing ever happened. You know, the caption ear’s have all been there and it’s the normal caption team we work with who are just so great and consistent. All the volunteers have been early, if not on time, you know. So the pro and then we realized, oh, the problem is that, that volunteer logged in? Oh, that’s why we all got booted. Oh, they were able to figure it out. Send a message to everyone and say if your shift starts at 9 15, we mean 9 15, we do not mean 9 13. Yes. So it wasn’t easy to fix challenge,
[00:28:02.27] spk_1:
conscientious volunteers. Not
[00:28:20.38] spk_2:
so we’re learning a lot about like what prep do the folks on both sides really need to pull that off. Like maybe maybe, you know, Ash and Jeremy and Drew have a session with you in the summer and talk about doing hybrid virtual events and how to make them really successful. You know, people are still doing. I mean so many folks fundraising gala have kept the hybrid piece where they’re like, oh, we could have 100 people at home donating that we didn’t buy food for. Yes, please, you know. Um so I think I think we’re really gonna see hybrid stay around. People are gonna want to keep doing that. Um and you know us, we’re happy to share all of our mistakes so that you can learn from them. Yes.
[00:29:30.55] spk_1:
Alright. Alright. So 24. So I would expect 24 NTC is also going to be a hybrid. It sounds you wouldn’t abandon that. All the learnings. Yeah, all the, all the problems next year, it’ll be 800 virtual. Alright, thank you. All right, we’re looking forward to 20 well, we’re loving 23 NTC here in Denver. Looking forward to next year. You and Gene and I, I think we just picked, identified probably three different subjects that the three of us could spend an hour talking about. I’m glad, you know, I’m glad I’m not the only one who’s concerned, even George wegner kinda, you know, he was more leaning towards, well, the risks aren’t, you know, I don’t, I don’t think that, that, that had great. Yeah, but I, I need George to be more and more thoughtful before he comes down on one side or the other.
[00:29:42.55] spk_2:
And I think that from, from any position
[00:29:44.61] spk_1:
Georges, let me just not put it on George wegner. I need the Georges Georges to be more
[00:30:56.77] spk_2:
thoughtful. I think it’s important to also remember that when we’re thinking of what are those risks, we’re filtering that through. What do I think those risks are? And, and I, or you and who you as the listener, whoever the one asking that question cannot be the one assessing risk for everyone. You have not experienced the same harm that everyone has experienced from tech in Ology. You maybe don’t have the same view of what you need that technology to do so, the idea that any one of us could say, oh, the risks aren’t that bad or these are the definitive list of risks. We just can’t, you know, it’s too dynamic of a constantly changing situation to say that the risks, the risk list stops or that it is or is not too much to care about, right? Because for some folks, there are people who are not online because of these risks, right? They are choosing to not even have access to some of the utilities that we all can benefit from working remotely, having access to education remotely because these risks are too harmful, right? So I just want to caution any of us from saying this is it or this is the view, right? The view is changing every day when all the people in this room release a new version of their product, right? Or by each other and decide to do different things and it’s
[00:31:12.82] spk_1:
also very personal. Yes, it has to be personal, organizational
[00:31:37.77] spk_2:
and that’s the that’s the place from which I want everybody here to take their duty, right? Is that it is personal and you have a duty as an organization to honor that personal level of choice and risk for every community member that you are expecting to give you their data, right? That you’re expecting to trust you. And that that’s kind of an entry point to to that mindfulness around technology is like it’s not yours. It is theirs. And are you allowing them to have choice? Are you allowing folks to decide how much data to give you a knot or what you can do with their data? Like it just opens up a whole five more shows of what we talk about, right?
[00:32:02.44] spk_1:
Alright, good. This is not, this is not there, this is not their last appearance.
[00:32:06.97] spk_2:
Let’s talk about Jean about the legal piece of that too, right? Because there’s a social conscience of what you do with your community members, data and there’s actual legal.
[00:32:46.00] spk_1:
We will, we will. All right, Amy Sample Ward, the C E O of N 10 grand high exalted mystic ruler of 23 NTC. Um I was surprised to see them walking on the street today. I thought I’d see them in a chauffeured limousine. You bring 1600 people in the city of Denver. I thought you get the penthouse suite concierge Bellman. Okay. Thank you very much. So. Good to see you. Thank you and thank you for being with our 23 NTC coverage where we are sponsored by Heller consulting, sharing the booth with us doing technology strategy and implementation for nonprofits. Thank you.
[00:33:04.34] spk_0:
It’s time for Tony’s take two first. I need to thank Heller consulting. So thank you Heller consulting for your sponsorship of tony-martignetti non profit radio at the 2023 nonprofit technology conference.
[00:33:21.78] spk_1:
Very
[00:34:52.37] spk_0:
grateful that we shared a large booth together that I was able to make lots of interviews to Heller after each interview, bringing folks over to meet the Heller team that was Kaya and Paige and Jet. And I also met the CEO Keith Heller. Uh Thank you. Thank you. Hello, consulting for partnering with me, sponsoring nonprofit radio at the 23 N T C. Thanks so much. Thanks to the listeners who came by, but a bunch of folks come over say, oh, you’re the, you that radio got, you know, the nonprofit radio guy, one guy said in the bathroom. But in any case, I got a chance to meet lots of listeners. So that’s very gratifying. Thank you to those folks came over. I’m not gonna name who came over in the men’s room. We’ll just leave that uh to lay right there. But thanks listeners who, who joined us at 23 N T C and thank U N 10 N 10 supporting nonprofit radio. I’m grateful for our partnership. Thank you to the team at N 10. Congratulations to the staff for a successful fun valuable conference. My thanks, my congratulations out to end 10. That is Tony’s take two. We’ve got boo koo, but loads more time here is building an inclusive board culture.
[00:35:28.60] spk_1:
Welcome to tony-martignetti, non profit radio coverage of 23 N T C. The 2023 nonprofit technology conference were at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver, Colorado where we are sponsored by Heller consulting technology strategy. And implementation for nonprofits with me now is Renee Reuben Ross. She is founder and CEO of the Ross Collective. Renee Reuben Ross. Welcome to nonprofit radio.
[00:35:35.60] spk_3:
Thanks so much. Great to be here.
[00:35:39.78] spk_1:
Absolute pleasure to have you. Your topic is building an inclusive culture on nonprofit boards. Right. Right. I think I have some sense, but I’m gonna let you articulate because you’ll do it better. Why we need this session?
[00:36:51.10] spk_3:
Oh, wow. Well, so many things. But, um, I think that I do a lot of different things. I do strategic planning and board development facilitation. And I also teach board development at Cal State University, East Bay. And so I’ve had so many, I identify as a white person and consultant. I’ve had so many people come up to me who are on board saying, wow, we are really struggling to build a positive culture and what do we need to do? How can we make things different? And I mean, I would say people of all different racial backgrounds, people who are, you know, people who might just be joining the board, who don’t know what’s going on. And so in, in, in having these conversations, I’ve developed a way of thinking about all right, what are some practices that support boards to do better work? Because I think that many of us, you probably know someone who’s joy. You know, it seems like everybody else knows what’s going on here and I’m trying to catch up, but I just don’t feel like I’m part of this and that might be around information. It might be around the culture in terms of racial equity, it might be around relationships. So, really thinking about what are some great practices that boards can keep in mind gender equity as well
[00:37:18.08] spk_1:
as a board. And there are two women and one’s a woman of color and, and we, you know, we feel minimized. Yes, I’ve heard things like, you know, we feel patronized, minimized. All the power is in the middle aged white guys.
[00:37:45.07] spk_3:
I start with the assumption that we all that we each have something to contribute. And going back to this idea of equity that the people who are closest to the problem should be weighing in on the solutions so that we really need to do consciously design boards and organizations in a way where all voices are heard and affirmed. And that that’s a good thing. That’s not, that’s not anybody losing anything that’s actually all of us getting to do better work that supports everybody. Yeah,
[00:38:01.01] spk_1:
the zero sum game where, well, if, if she has a voice than I’m losing that much of mine. But it’s, it’s, it’s, it’s
[00:38:12.05] spk_3:
ludicrous. Right. Right.
[00:38:12.78] spk_1:
Power is, power is infinite. Power, infinite. So you’ve got some signs and symptoms, indicators of, of what your current culture
[00:39:55.78] spk_3:
is. Right. Well, I am going to have a story that I’m going to share stories. So I was on a board and I had a colleague who came and joined that board. And at the beginning, she was pretty quiet. But then over time, what happened, which I had not expected was she started to come to the board meetings and there was always something bothering her and she was really angry and she, she became sadly this, this angry person in our meetings. And I didn’t expect this. She was someone that I knew she had some good things to contribute. But I started to think about what can I do? And I know that many of my students, many of the clients that I work with have the same issue which we’re going to talk about tomorrow in my session, which is what do you do about somebody who, who has, what do you do about somebody who has become a toxic board member? And so I suggested this kind of, this is really what happens. This is not like, oh, we’ve never met this person before. Usually people who come on board, somebody knows them ahead of time. But what ended up happening was I did my, I did my checklist, which is our, the board procedures. Good. Yes. Are we generally building positive relationships? Yes. Are we honoring equity and listening to all voices? Yes. And then it was like, what I ended up doing was counseling Micah colleague off the board. And I just said to her, you know what I’ve noticed is, it doesn’t seem like it makes you happy to be on this
[00:40:03.54] spk_1:
board. She probably realized it herself.
[00:40:21.46] spk_3:
She realized it herself. I’m somebody who’s not afraid to have the tough conversations. I wasn’t, I wasn’t angry with her. I was stating the truth in a courageous way and it got her to reflect on her participation and to leave the board. What
[00:40:23.47] spk_1:
do you think? Was, was there anything having to do with the, with the organization? Was it was, it was, it was some
[00:40:47.30] spk_3:
other things that were going on. And so many of us have a lot of things that are happening in our homes and with our families that maybe we are bringing to board meetings, right? So it’s really a matter of how can board members act courageous and proactively so that the board so that everybody feels, everybody feels like, wow, when I come to this meeting, things are going in a positive direction because what I’ve heard about boards these days is people really need to feel like their time is worthwhile and if they don’t, they want to do something else, especially now in this post pandemic time, my time is really valuable.
[00:41:13.58] spk_1:
Take off your three little three questions that you ask.
[00:41:16.68] spk_3:
Right. So, so I, so I have this framework that I share with my students, with my clients and my blog. It’s all about, are you utilizing formal practices? So that the first one is formal practices, goals agendas, agreements, term limits. We could just have a
[00:41:34.43] spk_1:
whole bylaws,
[00:41:39.98] spk_3:
bylaws, right? And, and I have, I have encountered or that will say, oh, no, we don’t have term limits. We have people on our board have been here for 20 years. You need to tighten that up. That is not responsible.
[00:41:51.17] spk_1:
You’re saying, I notice you’re saying not just have procedures. Are you following the bylaws may have two consecutive three year terms as the max and you’ve got this 20 year board member. So great,
[00:43:25.55] spk_3:
you got to enforce this and have a way of being in conversation. So first of all, for good, good meeting agendas that are aligned with the goals of the organization. Second of all informal procedures and this is really the relationship building peace. And I think that in these days, if anything, people want more than ever to feel that they feel connected to other board members, they feel a sense of belonging on the board that there’s compassion understanding that, you know, that it isn’t just get the work done, but they’re really that there’s some sort of positive team feeling. And I will say that I share this on a podcast on a webinar and someone said, well, how much does it cost to build? It doesn’t we’re talking a Starbucks coffee. Yes, presence, right? So, so first, so formal practices, informal practice and informal practices given attention, given, given attention really accounting for the fact that people process information differently, learn differently. That’s another informal practice that can really support good, good culture and good
[00:43:33.49] spk_1:
meetings on this, on this one before we move to the third, can other social events for the board which don’t have to be expensive. The person who’s concerned about spending too much money, you can, you can bring everybody into witness, witness some of the work you’re doing if you have that type of work.
[00:45:15.15] spk_3:
But you know what you just is, there was a board that I was invited to join and they said we want to have, we want to have, we’re having all of our meetings at seven a.m. And I was like, I know that I’m a working parent that’s seven a.m. is a horrible time for me. And, and so it is also a matter of being aware of how are, how, how can these practices of, of the board be as inclusive as possible. Um So, so then, and then going on to equity and the reason that so, and I define equity as being committed to shifting systems and sharing power as we talked about before. And the reason that I mentioned equity is that sometimes and I do some work as part of a cross race team where I’m leading along with my colleague, Crystal Cherry. We lead conversations for, for mostly historically white boards around racial equity. Sometimes there is the one person who one person who may be black or who may have something really, really important to say. And that person, even if it’s one person, that person needs to be hurt. Uh And so there’s some, some stepping back that needs to happen on behalf of, you know, by white people sometimes and some real perspective taking to focus more on equity
[00:45:16.30] spk_1:
sharing, power sharing. Uh
[00:45:32.37] spk_3:
And, and this is, we’re all on a learning journey, but it’s like start the journey, the train is going and, and again, if you, when we leave these conversations, we talk a lot about how does this align with the mission of the organization? So we had an arts organization that had their location in a primarily white neighborhood. Um Alright, how do you, what are you going to do in terms of outreach? Given that 45% of your city are people of color. You are not serving the mission to serve the whole community
[00:45:53.92] spk_1:
perceived in the community as a white elitist organization. So you’re not, you’re not attracting new supporters of any type volunteers, donors, board members, whatever is really
[00:46:04.04] spk_3:
about how does this work of um shifting systems of listening to more perspectives, deepen and strengthen the work of the organization?
[00:46:16.29] spk_1:
Anything else on the on the culture? Before we talk about dealing with your toxic person personages?
[00:46:26.56] spk_3:
I think that what I would say is I when I do this work, I encourage, I’m sure you do the same kind of thing. The first step is really assessment. How are you doing right now? And so as people are listening, I would say, put your podcast on pause for a second.
[00:46:52.19] spk_1:
Okay, come back. So, so,
[00:47:17.83] spk_3:
so, and, and these are questions for, for not just for one person, for the whole board. Um I will say that, that we had, we did one conversation with a potential client and it was this man, white man. And we said to him, well, are you building belonging on your board? And, and he said, of course, I am so and we said, well, how do you know? He’s like, well, I’ve asked my three best friends and they all feel a sense of belonging, you know, it’s like, okay, you got to go beyond beyond who you hear from. And maybe that means you survey your whole board or do you have a consultant come in and do interviews, whatever the way that you’re, you’re gathering data, you need to be more comprehensive in, in your learning and perspective taking.
[00:47:44.26] spk_1:
Can we go to toxic, toxic folks had to deal with? I mean, you had a good sample of a good story about your friend, your friend did the board experience.
[00:48:50.06] spk_3:
She’s still my friend because I spoke in a caring way. I wasn’t angry with her. I can see I do that. This is how I approach any kind of service or work, you know, and the same thing that I um that I would suggest for clients, positive or negative. In her case, there was she was having more of a negative experience. So it wasn’t the right fit for her. Other times, sometimes the situation comes up where somebody is on the board, they had a really strong relationship with the previous executive director with the previous staff. And then those people have left, the organization is going in a new direction and this person’s really frustrated. That is a pretty common scenario, right? And so what do you do? It’s up to the new leadership to say yes, we affirm the direction that we’re taking. We’re, we’re sorry that you, that you are not with us, but we are going forward. That’s okay. Again, it’s sometimes leaders, some of the leaders that I meet need just more courage to take this kind of action.
[00:49:10.61] spk_1:
Yeah, other other advice about approaching someone who’s, who’s toxic on a board.
[00:49:17.22] spk_3:
I think that’s just
[00:49:27.99] spk_1:
straightforward factual, you know, conversation. What about, what about in the moment in the, in the, in the heat of a meeting? Someone is dominating the conversation or, or just belittling someone else’s idea? That’s a good, that’s a better example, belittling someone else’s ideas were in the board meeting right now. Thank you for
[00:49:56.99] spk_3:
that. So, some of the practices that I do. So, one of the things that I do when I lead a meeting, I always use meeting agreements and meeting agreements are how it takes a minute or two. How do we want to be together? I have a list of meeting agreements around listening to one another. Curiosity respect
[00:50:03.32] spk_1:
before you joined the board meeting, at
[00:50:06.02] spk_3:
the beginning of each meeting for a minute. And then, and then it’s a matter of depending on how the meeting that helps frame
[00:50:14.81] spk_1:
things. How do we,
[00:50:55.00] spk_3:
is there anything you need to add? Um But I do think that this is where this is where some of this goes back to the framework that I’m a before. Because if, if there is, you want to start with a good agenda and you want, and it is possible to say, all right, well, we’ve been talking about this for 30 minutes. We said we would talk about it for 15. We’re going to cut it off here because we have other things that we need to accomplish and we’re gonna need to talk about this in committee. But so two different things. So one is if somebody is sort of going off, you can use some of those kinds of moves. But then the next part of it is is if someone is belittling somebody, I think that goes back to how do we want to be together and
[00:51:03.86] spk_1:
remind them of what we all agree half an hour
[00:51:06.90] spk_3:
ago and, and have maybe it’s the board president, maybe it’s executive director again, going back to that person. It should be the
[00:51:13.84] spk_1:
board chair in the, in the heat. Of the men in the heat of the meeting. It should be the board chair. It’s their job to run the job to run the meeting.
[00:51:24.00] spk_3:
But it may be that, that person, you want to talk to that person offline, find out what’s
[00:51:27.98] spk_1:
going on. But I’m putting you right in the, in the battle right now. We got to defuse the situation right now because someone is feeling someone has been hurt and, and minimized and someone else’s trotting over them. I think I would like, what do we all agree at the beginning of the meeting? This is not appropriate
[00:51:53.00] spk_3:
and I would go and what I would do would be to go back to them. Like I went back to my colleague and just said, you seem really angry in these meetings were all trying. We’re all working to get more meals to seniors what’s going on. You know, this is really a little bit beyond hear what they have to say and then see what the next step for them is. But, but really, but really again, courage, directness and, and I want to say, protecting everybody in the meeting by, by keeping a safe and caring environment.
[00:52:23.02] spk_1:
It’s also gonna depend on how the person reacts. I think in that moment with apology, you know, I’m I’m sorry, I got carried away versus
[00:52:34.27] spk_3:
okay. Fine. Yeah, that’s true. You’re right, you’re right.
[00:52:36.24] spk_1:
But this possible responses in between those but you know, apology a public apology in the moment goes a long way.
[00:54:03.20] spk_3:
Right. I had, I had another person who reached out to me and said, you know, we have one person who’s hijacking our meetings and he just won’t stop. And so then that was where I went back to my framework. And all right, do you have term limits? Do you have a structured agenda? Do you know what the purpose of these meetings is? I’ll use your checklist to have that structure. Have you talked with other board members to get clarity on what you want and how, how you want to be together and once you can get that, oh and adding the equity piece, are you, can you confirm that this person doesn’t have a perspective that are you sure that this person doesn’t have a perspective that needs to be listened to because I don’t want to, I don’t want to take that off the table. It may be that, that they do. In this case, the person did not. And when, when I talked to this client, it gave her the permission to say, alright, we understand that you want to do blah, blah, blah, but the nine of us don’t. And so we’re going forward over here and it seems like maybe this board isn’t right for you anymore. That’s okay. And that actually kept, it’s that it’s that 2020% of the people or 5% of the people taking up, you know, so much of your time and, and then the board got back on track through that. Okay.
[00:54:05.24] spk_1:
Um What else? What else? We’ve only spent like 20 minutes together? What else are you going to share with folks tomorrow that we haven’t talked
[00:54:12.14] spk_3:
about yet? Yeah, I think that. So I just, this is my first NTC to see how it is. I would say that, that, that
[00:54:23.47] spk_1:
congratulations on being selected as a speaker community, the community voted and chose you.
[00:55:55.14] spk_3:
It’s exciting. Um What I’m trying to do now is create a lot of spaciousness in the meetings that I lead in these presentations. And by spaciousness, I mean, spaciousness, interactivity you’re really giving because people more than ever want to talk, want to have the opportunity to talk. So how I’m, how I lead this conversation, so how I recommend board members should lead these conversations really to say we want to hear from you, we want time for us to talk it through and sometimes there may not be enough time in um in the meetings themselves that may mean that you need to go off and you know, have committee meetings so that you can be more expansive in exploring a certain topic. But really understanding that with everything going on in the world, people are holding a lot and there is a need for more processing of all of this and that needs to go into the design and to just come into you don’t want to come into a room and say, let’s, we’re just getting down to work. It’s really the opposite of that. It’s really what’s here in the room right now. Um, I, I have, there’s a book called Permission To Feel by Marc Brackett. Don’t know if you’ve ever heard of it. And there’s an app to that and it’s really about how you’re feeling right now and it’s such a simple question, but just to say as a check in with your board members, how are you feeling right now? And again, it doesn’t cost very much, but it’s a way to say we’re all here together. But what do you need to leave behind? So you can be here in the room and that creates a lot better work.
[00:56:25.24] spk_1:
You’re promising the folks who attend tomorrow that you’ll, you’ll leave them with a take away the next the next step, next step for building a healthier board. How do you help them identify that next step?
[00:57:33.26] spk_3:
So my, my theory of learning is what you care about. What you embrace. What you notice is what you’re going to start working on. So the reason that I am handing them my hand out with the Venn diagram of these three areas and sorry, I’m being technical, formal practices, informal practices, equity is because I, I don’t, I want each person in the room to reflect on what is working and, and what they want to do next. And to commit to something, right? Something that they want to change in the organization. And it might just be, um, I’m gonna go back to my board and I’m gonna share this with them and we’re gonna have, uh, you know, group conversation about this understanding that we are doing really well in terms of informal practices because we all get along really well. But we actually, we don’t have term limits and that’s hurting us because we’re not getting new people involved with our organization. So a
[00:57:39.50] spk_1:
lot of his internalized what you believe should be a next step where you believe you should work first.
[00:58:17.40] spk_3:
I have a longtime background in education, doctorate in education and studied adult education. Truly believe that we are building our own knowledge and motivation from what we care about and boards are too. What are you giving your attention to? So give my goal for the session is that people give their attention to these three different areas and think. Okay, I’m going to share many practices, but which ones do you need to pay more attention to? Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Can we leave it there? What do you think? Sure. Feel good.
[00:58:20.02] spk_1:
Yeah. Alright. You know, feeling like there’s something else we didn’t talk about. He didn’t ask me.
[00:58:46.44] spk_3:
Um I think we’re, I think we’re good. It’s really exciting to, you know, it’s really, I’m very curious about who’s going to come to this session and the challenges they’re bringing and I was, it’s very energizing to see okay room full of people, most of them I haven’t met before. And what will they, you know, what questions do they have about this and what, what’s working for them most? And where do they find, where do they feel like they need to do more fine tuning? What are you excited
[00:58:57.59] spk_1:
about that? What drew you to the nonprofit technology conference? This is your first one, but you’ve obviously been working with nonprofits a long time. What brought you to an NTC?
[00:59:07.30] spk_3:
I was, I was interested in, you know, in meeting all kinds of people and connecting and, you know, learning about some of the ideas that are out there and how this conference works. You
[00:59:17.40] spk_1:
just have never heard of it
[00:59:34.55] spk_3:
before. I have heard of it before. Yeah. And I mean, what I’ve noticed in my work is I have a lot of referral partners who are fundraising consultants who are sending me work and I’m sending them work and I’m guessing that I’ll connect with some new people, you know, who could be potential referral partners. So, yeah, you know, it’s funny because I did have a friend who said, wait, your, your facilitator, why are you going to the technology conference? But I was like, well, there’s a leadership track and so it’s not
[00:59:48.62] spk_1:
only for technical techies I T directors, we all know
[00:59:52.41] spk_3:
that. Right. Right. Right.
[01:00:02.14] spk_1:
Great, Renee Ruben. My pleasure. Thanks for Thanks for sharing a Reuben Ross founder and CEO at the Ross Collective. Thank you for being with tony-martignetti non profit radio coverage of 23 N T C where we are sponsored by Heller consulting technology strategy and implementation for nonprofits. Thanks for being my pleasure, Renee. Thank you. You’re welcome. And thank you
[01:01:16.37] spk_0:
next week. Technology Governance for Accidental Taxis as as accidental taxis, technology governance for accidental techies. If you missed any part of this week’s show, I beseech you find it at tony-martignetti dot com. I’m not sure you’d want to do that though. Actually, this week were sponsored by Donor box with intuitive fundraising software from donor box. Your donors give four times faster helping you help others. Donor box dot org. I’m sure my voice will sound better. Next week, our creative producer is Claire Meyerhoff. The shows social media is by Susan Chavez Marc Silverman is our web guy and this music is by Scott Stein. Thank you for that affirmation. Scotty B with me next week for nonprofit radio. Big nonprofit ideas for the other 95% go out and be great.